Cutaneous Pseudolymphoma

Back

Background

Pseudolymphoma is not a specific disease but rather an inflammatory response to known or unknown stimuli that results in a lymphomatous-appearing but benign accumulation of inflammatory cells.[1] In cutaneous pseudolymphoma, resemblance to lymphoma is usually most apparent histologically, but some examples may also mimic lymphoma clinically. When known, the inciting agent should be included along with the diagnosis of cutaneous pseudolymphoma. The term pseudolymphoma without modification should be reserved for idiopathic cases.

Localized, nodular pseudolymphomas are more common and typically mimic B-cell lymphoma. A variety of specific diseases are sometimes referred to as pseudolymphomas simply because they may resemble lymphoma. These disorders often show broad patches and plaques and often mimic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Examples include actinic reticuloid, lymphomatoid contact dermatitis, and lymphomatoid drug eruptions.[2] Note the images below.


View Image

Pseudolymphomatous drug eruption due to captopril, marked by erythematous to purple papules, patches, and plaques.


View Image

This erythrodermic pseudolymphoma (T-cell pattern) typifies drug-induced pseudolymphoma, which is most often secondary to anticonvulsant therapy.


View Image

This example of lymphocytoma cutis shows a localized, erythematous-to-brown, ill-defined plaque.


View Image

Lymphocytoma cutis of the shoulder, composed of flesh-colored or erythematous nodules in small groups.


View Image

This photograph of lymphocytoma cutis caused by an arthropod bite shows an erythematous scaling patch of the scalp with localized secondary alopecia.

Related Medscape Reference articles include Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphoma and Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.

Drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome

Drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome refers to a benign, drug-induced lymphocytic infiltrate in the skin that mimics cutaneous lymphoma histologically, clinically, or both.[3, 4, 5] While the clinical presentation can be highly variable, typically patients present with the insidious development of an asymptomatic singular lesion (papule, nodule, or plaque) following weeks to months of a drug exposure (see the image below).


View Image

This localized example of pseudolymphoma shows an ill-defined, thin, erythematous plaque.

Less often, multiple lesions or widespread skin involvement (erythroderma) is seen. The skin lesions typically resolve within several months of withdrawal of the offending agent[3, 4, 5, 6] and may recur with reinitiation of the implicated drug.

Since its initial report as a reaction to phenytoin more than 50 years ago,[6, 7, 8] more than a dozen additional drugs have been implicated. Clinicians should consider this diagnosis in patients with the appropriate clinical presentation and a history of drug therapy with one or more of the implicated agents.

Drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome is a subtype of cutaneous pseudolymphoma, a heterogenous group of benign T- or B-cell cutaneous lymphoproliferative processes with histologic features of malignancy but benign clinical behavior.[3] In most cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma, the cause is unknown. When the cause is known, most experts suggest the inciting agent be stated in the diagnosis. Along with medications, other reported causes of cutaneous pseudolymphoma include photosensitivity, trauma, folliculitis, foreign agents (eg, tattoo dyes, insect bites, scabies, arthropod venom, vaccinations, hyposensitization injections, gold, acupuncture), and infections (eg, HIV, varicella-zoster virus, Borreliaburgdorferi).[3, 9, 10]

Nomenclature

The heterogenous clinical, histological, and etiologic nature of cutaneous pseudolymphoma along with the association of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions has resulted in many different classification schemes and potentially confusing nomenclature.[3, 11, 12] The term drug-induced pseudolymphoma has been used to describe 2 kinds of adverse cutaneous drug reactions. The first is a subacute disease confined to the skin, which is the focus of this article. The second is an acute syndrome with a cutaneous eruption and associated systemic symptoms, also referred to as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome.

The confusion is furthered because the prototypic drug stimulus in both is phenytoin. Bocquet et al proposed the acronym DRESS (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) in 1996 to decrease the ambiguity of the term hypersensitivity syndrome.[11] The hypersensitivity syndrome has been postulated to represent a distinct clinical entity with a distinct biologic mechanism; however, the significant clinical overlap (ie, implicated drugs, symptomatology, and presentation) and histologic overlap make the nosologic distinction of these entities difficult to resolve.[2, 11, 12]

Pathophysiology

In persons with pseudolymphoma, lymphocytes and other inflammatory cells are recruited to the skin in response to known or unknown stimuli. Most cases are idiopathic. Lymphocytoma cutis is not considered a lymphocytic response to malignancy. Cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma with known etiology include reactions to tattoo dyes, jewelry (especially gold), insect bites, medications,[3] folliculitis, trauma, infections, vaccinations,[13] acupuncture, and contactants. A discrete subset of pseudolymphoma, borrelial lymphocytoma, primarily occurs in Europe in areas endemic for the tick Ixodes ricinus. Borrelial lymphocytoma is a response to infection by Borrelia burgdorferi subsp afzelius conferred by a tick bite. Another subset of pseudolymphoma is the result of an unusual systemic response to medications, typically anticonvulsants.

In contrast to classic drug eruptions, which develop minutes to days from drug ingestion and quickly resolve with drug discontinuation, the time course of drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome is prolonged and suggests a distinct biologic mechanism. Some postulate that drug-induced immunodysregulation results in the lymphoproliferative process.[5, 9] Abnormally functioning lymphocytes may proliferate in response to an antigen from the drug itself, an antigen unmasked by drug metabolism, or another nonpharmacologic antigen. Supporting this theory, alterations in immune function have been demonstrated in vivo or in vitro for many of the causative agents.[4, 5]

Usually, drug-induced cutaneous pseudolymphoma is a T-cell proliferation, but occasional B-cell–predominant forms have been reported. In general, evidence of T- or B-cell clonality (by polymerase chain reaction analysis of T-cell receptor or immunoglobulin H gene rearrangement or immunohistochemical light chain analysis) supports true lymphoma, whereas polyclonality supports a pseudolymphomatous proliferation; however, both polyclonal lymphomas and monoclonal pseudolymphomatous infiltrates have been well documented in the literature. Alone, clonality is insufficient to predict clinical behavior.

The emerging consensus is that pseudolymphomatous and lymphomatous proliferations represent 2 ends of a spectrum.[3, 9] Supporting this theory are examples of antigen-driven lymphoproliferation and progression to lymphoma in other organ systems (eg, Helicobacter pylori –related gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue [MALT] lymphoma). Transformation of drug-induced cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrates to malignant lymphoma has been reported with phenytoin; however, many of these cases predate the availability of current diagnostic standards and may have represented cases that would now be classified as hypersensitivity syndrome.[3]

Some authors believe the reported cases of transformation may have actually represented diagnostically challenging indolent B-cell cutaneous lymphomas.[3, 8] Similar cases involving pseudolymphomatous T-cell infiltrates progressing to true T-cell cutaneous lymphoma may potentially occur, but theses cases are less well-documented in the literature.

Individuals with a slow acetylator phenotype may be more susceptible to developing atypical lymphoid dyscrasias, owing to differences in drug metabolism kinetics, which may allow a pharmacologic antigen more opportunity to elicit an immune response or allow toxic drug metabolites to alter lymphocyte function.[11] This proposed pathophysiology pertains primarily to drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. Thus, the details are not discussed extensively here; however, similar mechanisms of immunodysregulation have been suggested for drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome.

The articles Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphoma and Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma may be of interest.

Etiology

Most cases are idiopathic. Known inciting agents include tattoo dyes,[14] jewelry (eg, gold earrings), insect bites, medications, folliculitis, trauma, vaccinations,[15] other injectables (eg, liquid silicone[16] ), irritants, and infection (eg, varicella-zoster virus, Borrelia species, molluscum contagiosum).

Known inciting agents for lymphocytoma cutis include the following:

Drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome

Anticonvulsants, typically phenytoin and carbamazepine, are the most frequent cause of drug-induced pseudolymphoma. Nevertheless, the number of implicated agents reported to cause either drug-induced pseudolymphoma or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome is expanding.

Drug classes and the reported subclasses and agents are as follows:

Epidemiology

United States statistics

No data on US prevalence or incidence of lymphocytoma cutis are available.

Although drug-induced pseudolymphoma remains a rare disorder, more than 100 individual cases have been reported in the literature worldwide.

International statistics

No frequency data are available. Lymphocytoma cutis is uncommon but not rare. A discrete subset of lymphocytoma cutis, borrelial lymphocytoma, occurs primarily in Europe, in areas in which the I ricinus tick is endemic.

Racial differences in incidence

Although 90% of reported patients with pseudolymphoma are white, racial predilection has not been established.

No racial predilection is apparent for drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndromes may affect black patients more frequently than white patients.[11, 12] The familial aggregation seen may be due to inherited defects in drug metabolism, making some patients more susceptible.

Sexual differences in incidence

In reported cases of localized pseudolymphoma, the female-to-male ratio is approximately 2:1. No significant epidemiologic data are available regarding entities in the T-cell pattern pseudolymphoma spectrum.

Age-related differences in incidence

Individuals of any age may be affected, but localized, nodular pseudolymphoma is most common in early life. The mean age of onset is 34 years. Two thirds of patients are younger than 40 years at the time of biopsy. Approximately 8% of cases involve patients younger than 18 years. Borrelial pseudolymphoma is more common in children than in adults.

In the largest published series, the average patient age was 61 years. Individual cases have been reported to range from childhood to the ninth decade of life.

Prognosis

If the offending agent is removed, resolution of cutaneous pseudolymphoma is achieved. Idiopathic examples of cutaneous pseudolymphoma tend to be chronic and indolent. Spontaneous regression of cutaneous pseudolymphoma may occur over the course of months or a few years. Recurrence has been noted.

Following cessation of the implicated medications, complete clearance of drug-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome is usually noted within 1-3 months. However, a few patients may require surgical excision or external radiation of one or more lesions. Recurrence following complete excision has not been reported.

Complications

Occasional case reports of cutaneous pseudolymphoma have described evolution to lymphoma. A significant percentage of these cases may have represented histologically subtle lymphoma from the outset.

In rare instances, malignant lymphoma has appeared following apparent resolution of phenytoin- and carbamazepine-induced pseudolymphomas. These cases have been termed pseudo-pseudolymphomas.[11]

Mortality/morbidity

Pseudolymphoma is not associated with mortality. Localized variants rarely result in morbidity other than minor pain or pruritus. Rare cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma have been described in which the pseudolymphoma has evolved into cutaneous lymphoma.

In most cases, drug-induced pseudolymphoma regresses spontaneously following withdrawal of the offending agent. Misdiagnosis of these lesions as a malignant entity could lead to inappropriate chemotherapeutic treatment.

Little is understood about the natural course of these lesions if drug exposure is allowed to continue. As discussed, transformation into malignant lymphoma has been reported in the literature, but many of these cases predate current diagnostic standards. Progression from a benign lymphocytic cutaneous infiltrate to cutaneous lymphoma remains poorly defined; however, close clinical follow up is prudent to monitor for such an event.

Mortality rates associated with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome can reach as high as 10%, and the condition requires specific therapy.[11]

Patient Education

If the inciting stimulus of the cutaneous pseudolymphoma is known, it should be subsequently avoided.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicineHealth's patient education articles Drug Allergy and Molluscum Contagiosum.

History

Patients with B-cell pattern pseudolymphoma present with a nodule or a group of discrete nodules, usually with minimal associated symptoms. Occasionally, patients present with pruritus or pain. Patients with a T-cell pattern of cutaneous pseudolymphoma usually present with broader patches, which are often asymptomatic.

The onset of drug-induced pseudolymphoma is insidious. Most patients present with a single slowly enlarging papular, nodular, or plaquelike lesion several weeks following the initiation of implicated medications. However, several patients have demonstrated drug-induced pseudolymphoma after more than 5 years of therapy.

In the drug hypersensitivity syndrome, patients frequently report intermittent low-grade fever and local or diffuse lymphadenopathy. Constitutional symptoms may include headache, nausea, malaise, arthralgias, conjunctivitis, and pharyngitis.

Physical Examination

Examination of patients with a B-cell pattern of pseudolymphoma usually reveals a single nodule, from one to several centimeters in diameter. Although the lesions may be soft, they are more often firm. Typically, the lesions are red to purple in color, but they may show no coloration. Approximately three quarters of cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma are localized. The remaining cases usually show grouped papules in a single defined region. More disseminated cases are rare. The most common site of involvement in cutaneous pseudolymphoma is the face (70%), followed by the chest and the upper extremities. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma lesions are infrequent below the waist.

Sites of predilection for borrelial pseudolymphoma include the earlobe, the nipple, the areola, the nose, and the scrotum (sites of low skin temperature).

Patients with T-cell pattern pseudolymphoma typically present with broad, erythematous patches and/or plaques, as shown in the image below. Pseudolymphomatous actinic reticuloid affects sun-exposed areas. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis demonstrates lesions in areas where the inciting agent has come in contact with the skin.[20]


View Image

This localized example of pseudolymphoma shows an ill-defined, thin, erythematous plaque.

Erythematous patches, similar to mycosis fungoides (MF), may be seen, but, in contrast to MF, they may be more localized and not restricted to sun-protected sites.[3] Frequently, a small number of erythematous indurated papules, plaques, or nodules are seen. Rarely, a solitary tumor may appear.

In the drug hypersensitivity syndrome, patients may present with features of Sézary syndrome. Other physical findings associated with the hypersensitivity syndrome include splenomegaly, marked localized or diffuse lymphadenopathy, and high-grade fever.[12]

Approach Considerations

Immunohistochemical stains are usually required to facilitate differentiation between pseudolymphomatous eruptions and lymphoma. Although none of these tests is perfectly specific or diagnostic alone, they may be particularly helpful in supporting or refuting a diagnosis of lymphoma in the appropriate clinicopathologic context.

Before advances in immunophenotyping and gene rearrangement analysis, the diagnosis was based on histologic findings and benign clinical behavior. Clinical follow up for 5 years following initial skin biopsy had been accepted as confirmation of the diagnosis[9] ; however, both drug-induced pseudolymphoma and variants of cutaneous B-cell lymphoma, such as marginal zone, may have a similar indolent course.

In patients with borrelial pseudolymphoma, antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi may be identified in 50% of cases. Additionally, the organism may be identified in tissue via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

Routine laboratory results most often remain within the reference ranges and play a limited role in diagnosis.[11]

CBC count

Leukocytosis with eosinophilia may occur in severe cases.

Liver-associated enzymes

Transaminitis has been reported; however, it is more prevalent in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and, when present, confers a worse prognosis, with one study reporting 10-50% mortality with severe hepatitis.[2]

Cell surface marker analysis

True MF typically has a CD3+ CD4+ CD7- immunophenotype. Most drug-induced pseudolymphomas also contain CD3+ CD4+ T cells; however, CD7 is often retained. Because CD7 is lost in some pseudolymphomas and because it is not universally absent in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), the CD3+ CD4+ CD7+ phenotype is not 100% specific for pseudolymphoma.[5, 8, 9] Loss of CD5 and restriction of the epidermotropic cells to a CD4 phenotype favors MF.

T-cell receptor gene rearrangement studies

PCR-based assessment of T-cell receptor gamma genes may be used to reveal a dominant clone of T-cells within a population. Because T-cell pseudolymphomas are most often polyclonal, demonstration of such a dominant clone favors a diagnosis of CTCL. Unfortunately, both rare monoclonal T-cell pseudolymphomas and polyclonal CTCL cases have been reported, thus decreasing the specificity of this assay.[8, 21] Thus far, the identification of clonality in pseudolymphoma lesions has not been predictive of lymphomatous transformation.[3, 6, 21]

Immunoglobulin light-chain analysis

Some subsets of B-cell lymphoma exhibit a monoclonal restriction to either kappa or lambda light chains. Because B-cell pseudolymphomas tend to be polyclonal, detection of such a light-chain clone by immunohistochemistry favors true B-cell lymphoma.[12]

Biopsy

Biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis of pseudolymphoma. An adequate sample extending well into the subcutis with avoidance of crush artifact is essential.

Histologic Findings

Lymphocytoma cutis must be differentiated from lymphoma. Most examples simulate B-cell lymphoma and show a nodular inflammatory infiltrate in the dermis. The key histologic features that favor pseudolymphoma over lymphoma include the presence of a mixed infiltrate that includes histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells, in addition to lymphocytes, as shown in the image below.[22]


View Image

Well-developed lymphoid follicles in a background of mixed inflammatory cells with small lymphocytes are typical of lymphocytoma cutis.

The infiltrate in lymphocytoma cutis tends to be more top-heavy, while most lymphomas are centered in the deep dermis or the subcutis. Samples of lymphocytoma cutis typically have germinal centers and tingible body macrophages, as shown in the images below. Occasional large lymphoid cells may be present; however, they rarely dominate the histologic picture.


View Image

A mixed inflammatory infiltrate with germinal centers is indicative of lymphocytoma cutis.

Immunohistochemical staining may also be useful and generally shows a mixed B- and T-cell population with a high MIB-1–positive proliferative fraction.[23] Staining for kappa and lambda light chains shows a polyclonal pattern of staining. Fresh, unfixed tissue may be required for adequate assessment of kappa/lambda labeling.

Some cases show a T-cell histologic pattern with a bandlike infiltrate in the papillary dermis, predominantly of small lymphocytes, with variable epidermotropism. Although these features mimic CTCL/MF, the clinical presentation is often characteristic.[9]

Drug-induced pseudolymphoma most often resembles the bandlike T-cell infiltrate of MF.[3, 11] Less frequently, a nodular T- or B-cell infiltrate is seen. In all subtypes, frequent mitoses with nuclear and architectural atypia may occur, truly simulating their malignant counterparts.

In the most common variant, MF-like drug-induced T-cell pseudolymphoma, bands of small T lymphocytes invade the papillary dermis and disrupt the dermoepidermal junction. Epidermotropism, if present, is mild and generally lacks Pautrier microabscesses. Deep perivascular and periadnexal infiltrates may be observed. Dermal edema, acanthosis, and spongiosis may help to differentiate this condition from true CTCL. While similar in overall appearance, CTCL typically displays conspicuous epidermotropism and papillary dermal fibroplasia and exhibits minimal spongiosis. Close inspection of the lymphocytes to identify cerebriform cells is important because the predominance of these atypical cells in the epidermis favors MF.

In nodular drug-induced T-cell pseudolymphoma, nodular T-cell infiltrates may be either isolated or may appear concomitantly with MF-like lesions. They consist of small lymphocytes admixed with variable histiocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils. Nuclear atypia, when present, is generally mild.[3]

Nodular drug-induced B-cell pseudolymphoma is infrequently encountered.[9] The nodules contain mildly atypical lymphocytes interspersed with a variety of mononuclear cells. An infiltrate containing well-formed germinal centers limited to the papillary and upper reticular dermis (top-heavy) favors pseudolymphoma,[3] although much more overlap exists between true cutaneous lymphoma (especially marginal zone type) and drug-induced cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia.[7]

Approach Considerations

When the offending agent is known, its removal results in resolution of the cutaneous pseudolymphoma. Cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma documented to occur as a result of infection should be appropriately treated. In idiopathic cases of cutaneous pseudolymphoma, treatment is not mandatory. Cures may be effected via surgical removal, cryosurgery, or local irradiation. Some reports have noted a response to topical or injected corticosteroids and topical immunomodulators such as tacrolimus. In severe cases of lymphocytoma cutis, local radiation therapy can be effective.

Medical Care

Patients with presumed pseudolymphoma in whom the possibility of lymphoma cannot be excluded should be evaluated for the possibility of concurrent extracutaneous disease and followed for possible emergence of lymphoma.

When the diagnosis of pseudolymphoma is suspected, all implicated drugs should be discontinued. Because lesions are typically asymptomatic, no additional medical treatment is required. A short course of topical or intralesional steroids may be attempted to hasten regression. The time course for lesion regression can range from 1-3 months. Careful follow up is prudent because a nonresolving lesion should prompt concern for a malignant process.

The Medscape Skin Cancer Resource Center may be of interest.

Surgical Care

In cutaneous pseudolymphoma, simple excision of the involved site can be curative in some cases.

Surgical removal or cryosurgery may be effective in some cases of lymphocytoma cutis.

Lesions that interfere with function or are cosmetically undesirable may be surgically removed. No recurrence of excised lesions has been seen after withdrawal of the causative drugs. In cases of incomplete regression, external radiation therapy has also been reported to be successful.

The Medscape Dermatologic Surgery Resource Center may be of interest.

Long-Term Monitoring

Because malignant lymphomas have been reported following clearance of pseudolymphoma, patients should be continually monitored for constitutional signs of lymphoma.

Deterrence/Prevention

In most cases, drug-induced pseudolymphoma regresses spontaneously following withdrawal of the offending agent.

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy for cutaneous pseudolymphoma are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications.

Hydrocortisone valerate 0.2% (Ala Cort, HydroSKIN, Locoid, Pandel, NuZon, Dermasorb, NuCort, Rederm, Westcort)

Clinical Context:  Hydrocortisone valerate is an adrenocorticosteroid derivative suitable for application to skin or external mucous membranes. It has mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid effects, resulting in anti-inflammatory activity. It is used to treat inflammatory dermatosis responsive to steroids. Hydrocortisone valerate decreases inflammation by suppressing the migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reversing capillary permeability.

Betamethasone (Diprolene, Luxiq, Alphatrex)

Clinical Context:  Betamethasone is for inflammatory dermatosis responsive to steroids. It decreases inflammation by suppressing the migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reversing capillary permeability.

Clobetasol (Temovate, Clobex, Clux)

Clinical Context:  Clobetasol is a class I superpotent topical steroid; it suppresses mitosis and increases the synthesis of proteins that decrease inflammation and cause vasoconstriction.

Fluocinonide (Vanos)

Clinical Context:  Fluocinonide is a high-potency topical corticosteroid that inhibits cell proliferation; it is immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory.

Desonide (DesOwen, Verdeso, LoKara)

Clinical Context:  Desonide stimulates the synthesis of enzymes that decrease inflammation. It suppresses mitotic activity and causes vasoconstriction.

Fluocinolone (Capex, Derma-Smoothe/FS, Synalar)

Clinical Context:  Fluocinolone is a fluorinated corticosteroid of moderate potency at the 0.025% concentration and low potency at the 0.01% concentration (class 6). It has anti-inflammatory, antipruritic, and vasoconstrictive properties.

Class Summary

These agents have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. In addition, these agents modify the body’s immune response to diverse stimuli.

Author

Christine J Ko, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Earl J Glusac, MD, Professor, Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Inbal Braunstein, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jon H Meyerle, MD, Assistant Professor, Department Dermatology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Chief, Immunodermatology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD, Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, Vice-Chairman, Residency Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Donald Belsito, MD Professor of Clinical Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center

Donald Belsito, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Contact Dermatitis Society, Dermatology Foundation, New York County Medical Society, New York Dermatological Society, Noah Worcester Dermatological Society, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Inbal Braunstein University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Günter Burg, MD Professor and Chairman Emeritus, Department of Dermatology, University of Zürich School of Medicine; Delegate of The Foundation for Modern Teaching and Learning in Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Switzerland

Günter Burg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Dermatological Association, International Society for Dermatologic Surgery, North American Clinical Dermatologic Society, and Pacific Dermatologic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dirk M Elston, MD Director, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York

Dirk M Elston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jacqueline M Junkins-Hopkins, MD Associate Professor, Director, Division of Dermatopathology and Oral Pathology, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

Jacqueline M Junkins-Hopkins, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and American Society of Dermatopathology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Michael S Lehrer, MD Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania

Michael S Lehrer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, and American Society for Dermatologic Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Daniel S Loo, MD Associate Professor of Dermatology, Residency Program Director, Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center

Daniel S Loo, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and Association of Professors of Dermatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard P Vinson, MD Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Brodell RT, Santa Cruz DJ. Cutaneous pseudolymphomas. Dermatol Clin. Oct 1985;3(4):719-34. [View Abstract]
  2. Choi TS, Doh KS, Kim SH, Jang MS, Suh KS, Kim ST. Clinicopathological and genotypic aspects of anticonvulsant-induced pseudolymphoma syndrome. Br J Dermatol. Apr 2003;148(4):730-6. [View Abstract]
  3. Albrecht J, Fine LA, Piette W. Drug-associated lymphoma and pseudolymphoma: recognition and management. Dermatol Clin. Apr 2007;25(2):233-44, vii. [View Abstract]
  4. Magro CM, Crowson AN. Drug-induced immune dysregulation as a cause of atypical cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates: a hypothesis. Hum Pathol. Feb 1996;27(2):125-32. [View Abstract]
  5. Magro CM, Crowson AN, Kovatich AJ, Burns F. Drug-induced reversible lymphoid dyscrasia: a clonal lymphomatoid dermatitis of memory and activated T cells. Hum Pathol. Feb 2003;34(2):119-29. [View Abstract]
  6. Bouloc A, Delfau-Larue MH, Lenormand B, Meunier F, Wechsler J, Thomine E, et al. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasias. French Study Group for Cutaneous Lymphomas. Arch Dermatol. Feb 1999;135(2):168-72. [View Abstract]
  7. Baldassano MF, Bailey EM, Ferry JA, Harris NL, Duncan LM. Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia and cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma: comparison of morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Am J Surg Pathol. Jan 1999;23(1):88-96. [View Abstract]
  8. Cerroni L, Kerl H. Diagnostic immunohistology: cutaneous lymphomas and pseudolymphomas. Semin Cutan Med Surg. Mar 1999;18(1):64-70. [View Abstract]
  9. Ploysangam T, Breneman DL, Mutasim DF. Cutaneous pseudolymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1998;38(6 Pt 1):877-95; quiz 896-7. [View Abstract]
  10. Camilot D, Arnez ZM, Luzar B, Pizem J, Zgavec B, Falconieri G. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma following tattoo application: report of two new cases of a potential lymphoma mimicker. Int J Surg Pathol. Jun 2012;20(3):311-5. [View Abstract]
  11. Bocquet H, Bagot M, Roujeau JC. Drug-induced pseudolymphoma and drug hypersensitivity syndrome (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: DRESS). Semin Cutan Med Surg. Dec 1996;15(4):250-7. [View Abstract]
  12. Callot V, Roujeau JC, Bagot M, Wechsler J, Chosidow O, Souteyrand P, et al. Drug-induced pseudolymphoma and hypersensitivity syndrome. Two different clinical entities. Arch Dermatol. Nov 1996;132(11):1315-21. [View Abstract]
  13. Maubec E, Pinquier L, Viguier M, et al. Vaccination-induced cutaneous pseudolymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr 2005;52(4):623-9. [View Abstract]
  14. Kluger N, Vermeulen C, Moguelet P, et al. Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia (pseudolymphoma) in tattoos: a case series of seven patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Feb 2010;24(2):208-13. [View Abstract]
  15. Porto DA, Comfere NI, Myers LM, Abbott JJ. Pseudolymphomatous reaction to varicella zoster virus vaccination: role of viral in situ hybridization. J Cutan Pathol. Nov 4 2009;[View Abstract]
  16. Michaels B, Michaels J, Mobini N. Prominent lymphoid infiltrate with a pseudolymphoma-like morphology: a new histological finding of injectable liquid silicone. J Cutan Pathol. Nov 2009;36(11):1224-6. [View Abstract]
  17. Kazandjieva J, Tsankov N. Tattoos: dermatological complications. Clin Dermatol. Jul-Aug 2007;25(4):375-82. [View Abstract]
  18. Welsh JP, Ko C, Hsu WT. Lymphomatoid drug reaction secondary to methylphenidate hydrochloride. Cutis. Jan 2008;81(1):61-4. [View Abstract]
  19. Addeo R, Montella L, Baldi A, Cennamo G, Guarrasi R, Faiola V, et al. Atypical cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia induced by chemotherapy in a patient with advanced colon carcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer. Nov 2007;6(10):728-30. [View Abstract]
  20. Braun RP, French LE, Feldmann R, Chavaz P, Saurat JH. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma, lymphomatoid contact dermatitis type, as an unusual cause of symmetrical upper eyelid nodules. Br J Dermatol. Aug 2000;143(2):411-4. [View Abstract]
  21. Bachelez H. The clinical use of molecular analysis of clonality in cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrates. Arch Dermatol. Feb 1999;135(2):200-2. [View Abstract]
  22. Burg G, Kerl H, Schmoeckel C. Differentiation between malignant B-cell lymphomas and pseudolymphomas of the skin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Apr 1984;10(4):271-5. [View Abstract]
  23. Geerts ML, Kaiserling E. A morphologic study of lymphadenosis benigna cutis. Dermatologica. 1985;170(3):121-7. [View Abstract]

Pseudolymphomatous drug eruption due to captopril, marked by erythematous to purple papules, patches, and plaques.

This erythrodermic pseudolymphoma (T-cell pattern) typifies drug-induced pseudolymphoma, which is most often secondary to anticonvulsant therapy.

This example of lymphocytoma cutis shows a localized, erythematous-to-brown, ill-defined plaque.

Lymphocytoma cutis of the shoulder, composed of flesh-colored or erythematous nodules in small groups.

This photograph of lymphocytoma cutis caused by an arthropod bite shows an erythematous scaling patch of the scalp with localized secondary alopecia.

This localized example of pseudolymphoma shows an ill-defined, thin, erythematous plaque.

This localized example of pseudolymphoma shows an ill-defined, thin, erythematous plaque.

Well-developed lymphoid follicles in a background of mixed inflammatory cells with small lymphocytes are typical of lymphocytoma cutis.

A mixed inflammatory infiltrate with germinal centers is indicative of lymphocytoma cutis.

This localized example of pseudolymphoma shows an ill-defined, thin, erythematous plaque.

Pseudolymphomatous drug eruption due to captopril, marked by erythematous to purple papules, patches, and plaques.

This erythrodermic pseudolymphoma (T-cell pattern) typifies drug-induced pseudolymphoma, which is most often secondary to anticonvulsant therapy.

Biopsy specimens of pseudolymphoma vary substantially, but they most often exhibit a mixed inflammatory infiltrate with prominent lymphoid follicle formation.

This example of lymphocytoma cutis shows a localized, erythematous-to-brown, ill-defined plaque.

Lymphocytoma cutis of the shoulder, composed of flesh-colored or erythematous nodules in small groups.

This photograph of lymphocytoma cutis caused by an arthropod bite shows an erythematous scaling patch of the scalp with localized secondary alopecia.

A mixed inflammatory infiltrate with germinal centers is indicative of lymphocytoma cutis.

Well-developed lymphoid follicles in a background of mixed inflammatory cells with small lymphocytes are typical of lymphocytoma cutis.