Acute Management of Stroke

Back

Initial Treatment

The goal for the acute management of patients with stroke is to stabilize the patient and to complete initial evaluation and assessment, including imaging and laboratory studies, within 60 minutes of patient arrival.[1] (See Table 1, below.) Critical decisions focus on the need for intubation, blood pressure control, and determination of risk/benefit for thrombolytic intervention.

Table 1. NINDS* and ACLS** Recommended Stroke Evaluation Time Benchmarks for Potential Thrombolysis Candidate



View Table

See Table

Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia need to be identified and treated early in the evaluation. Not only can both produce symptoms that mimic ischemic stroke, but they can also aggravate ongoing neuronal ischemia. Administration of glucose in hypoglycemia produces profound and prompt improvement, while insulin should be started for patients with stroke and hyperglycemia. Ongoing studies will help to determine the optimal level of glycemic control.[2]

Hyperthermia is infrequently associated with stroke but can increase morbidity. Administration of acetaminophen, by mouth or per rectum, is indicated in the presence of fever (temperature >100.4° F [38° C]).

Supplemental oxygen is recommended when the patient has a documented oxygen requirement. To date, there is conflicting evidence whether supernormal oxygenation improves outcome.

Optimal blood pressure targets remain to be determined. Many patients are hypertensive on arrival. American Stroke Association guidelines have reinforced the need for caution in lowering blood pressures acutely.

In the small proportion of patients with stroke who are relatively hypotensive, pharmacologically increasing blood pressure may improve flow through critical stenoses.

Serial monitoring and interventions when necessary early in the clinical course and eventual stroke rehabilitation and physical and occupational therapy are the ideals of management. (See Table 2, below.)

In patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), failure to recognize the potential for near- term stroke, failure to perform a timely assessment for stroke risk factors, and failure to initiate primary and secondary stroke prevention exposes the patient to undue risk of stroke and exposes clinicians to potential litigation. TIAs confer a 10% risk of stroke within 30 days, and one half of the strokes occurring after a TIA, occurred within 48 hours.[3]

Table 2. General Management of Patients With Acute Stroke[1, 4]



View Table

See Table

Thrombolytic Therapy

Current treatments for acute ischemic stroke include IV thrombolytic therapy with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and endovascular therapies using stent retriever devices.[5] .  A 2015 update of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke recommends that patients eligible for intravenous t-PA should receive intravenous t-PA even if endovascular treatments are being considered and that patients should receive endovascular therapy with a stent retriever if they meet criteria.[5]

Newer stroke trials have explored the benefit of using neuroimaging to select patients who are most likely to benefit from thrombolytic therapy and the potential benefits of extending the window for thrombolytic therapy beyond the guideline of 3 hours with t-PA and newer agents. CT angiography may demonstrate the location of vascular occlusion. CT perfusion studies are capable of producing perfusion images and together with CT angiography are becoming more available and utilized in the acute evaluation of stroke patients.[6]

The Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) trial suggested that there might be benefit of administering IV t-PA within 3-6 hours of stroke onset in patients with small ischemic cores on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and larger perfusion abnormalities (large ischemic penumbras).[7]

The Desmoteplase In Acute Ischemic Stroke (DIAS) trial sought to show the benefit of administering desmoteplase in patients within 3-9 hours of onset of acute stroke with a significant mismatch (>20%) between perfusion abnormalities and ischemic core on diffusion-weighted MRI[8] .  Larger randomized trials of desmoteplase were negative.[9]

Muchada et al performed a study on 581 consecutive patients treated with alteplase to identify the impact of time-to-treatment according to stroke severity on functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. They found that the window for favorable outcome was 120 minutes or less for moderate strokes, but time-to-treatment seemed unrelated to functional outcome in mild and severe stroke.[10]

In a study of 285 patients who received intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, revascularization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction scores, 2b and 3) occurred in 73.9%; 5.6% developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages; 43.3% achieved good functional outcome; and 22.2% died within 90 days. According to the authors, adjusted comparisons by subgroups (age ≤ or >80 yr; onset-to-groin puncture ≤ or >6 hr; anterior or posterior strokes; previous IV recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator or isolated endovascular treatment/therapy; revascularization or no revascularization) systematically favored revascularization (lower proportion of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages and death rates and higher proportion of good outcome), and multivariate analyses confirmed the independent protective effect of revascularization.[11]

A study by Jovin et al showed successful endovascular therapy beyond 8 hours from time last seen well in patients selected for treatment based on MRI or CT perfusion imaging. Revascularization was successful in about 73% of patients.[12]

Advanced neuroimaging with diffusion and perfusion imaging may then serve an important role in identifying potentially salvageable tissue at risk and guiding clinical decision making regarding therapy.[8, 13, 14, 15, 16]

The iScore may also be used in patients with an acute ischemic stroke to predict clinical response and risk of hemorrhagic complications following IV thrombolytic therapy.[17]

Stabilization of Airway and Breathing

Patients presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less, rapidly decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale scores, or inadequate airway protection or ventilation require emergent airway control via rapid sequence intubation.

When increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is suspected, rapid sequence induction should be directed at minimizing the potentially adverse effects of intubation.

In unusual cases of potential imminent brain herniation, where the goal of mechanical ventilation is hyperventilation to decrease ICP by decreasing cerebral blood flow, the recommended endpoint is an arterial pCO2 of 32-36 mm Hg. IV mannitol can be considered as well.

Supplemental oxygen use should be guided by pulse oximetry. Patients should receive supplemental oxygen if their pulse oximetry reading or arterial blood gas measurement reveals that they are hypoxic (SaO 2 < 94%). The most common causes of hypoxia in the patient with acute stroke are partial airway obstruction, hypoventilation, atelectasis, or aspiration of stomach or oropharyngeal contents.[18, 19]

Intravenous Access and Cardiac Monitoring

Patients with acute stroke require IV access and cardiac monitoring in the emergency department (ED). Patients with acute stroke are at risk for cardiac arrhythmias. In addition, atrial fibrillation may be associated with acute stroke as either the cause (embolic disease) or as a complication.

Blood Glucose Control

Severe hyperglycemia appears to be independently associated with poor outcome and reduced reperfusion in thrombolysis, as well as extension of the infarcted territory.[20, 21, 22] Additionally, normoglycemic patients should not be given excessive glucose-containing IV fluids, as this may lead to hyperglycemia and may exacerbate ischemic cerebral injury.

Blood sugar control should be tightly maintained with insulin therapy, with the goal of establishing normoglycemia (90-140 mg/dL). Additionally, close monitoring of blood sugar level should continue throughout hospitalization to avoid hypoglycemia.[1]

Patient Positioning

Studies have previously shown that cerebral perfusion pressure is maximized when patients are maintained in a supine position. However, lying flat may serve to increase ICP.  A cluster-randomized crossover trial in patients with acute stroke (85% ischemic) showed that disability outcomes after acute stroke did not differ significantly between patients assigned to a lying-flat position for 24 hours and patients assigned to a sitting-up position with the head elevated to at least 30 degrees for 24 hours.[23]   Because prolonged immobilization may lead to its own complications, including deep venous thrombosis, pressure ulcer aspiration, and pneumonia, patients should not be kept flat for longer than 24 hours.[24]

Blood Pressure Control

In poor flow states―which occur with thrombotic and embolic ischemic stroke, as well as with increased ICP due to cerebral edema―the cerebral vasculature loses vasoregulatory capability and thus relies directly on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output for maintenance of cerebral blood flow. Therefore, aggressive efforts to lower blood pressure may decrease perfusion pressure and may prolong or worsen ischemia. Rapid reduction of blood pressure, no matter the degree of hypertension, may in fact be harmful. Both elevated and low blood pressures are associated with poor outcomes in patients with acute stroke.[25] (See Table 3, below.)

Studies have demonstrated that blood pressure typically drops in the first 24 hours after acute stroke, whether or not antihypertensives are administered. Furthermore, studies have revealed poorer outcomes in patients with lower blood pressures, with these outcomes correlating with the degree of pressure decline.[25, 26]

In a 2012 analysis of data from The Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial, acute stroke patients with a large decrease or increase or no change in systolic blood pressure experienced an increased risk of early adverse events compared with patients with a small decrease, and patients with an increase or no change in systolic blood pressure had an increased risk of poor neurological outcome compared with other patients. Routine attempts to lower blood pressure in the acute phase of stroke should probably be avoided.[27]

The consensus recommendation is to lower blood pressure only if systolic pressure is in excess of 220 mm Hg or if diastolic pressure is greater than 120 mm Hg.[19] However, a systolic blood pressure greater than 185 mm Hg or a diastolic pressure greater than 110 mm Hg is a contraindication to the use of thrombolytics. Therefore, the management of elevated blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke may vary, depending on whether the patient is a candidate for thrombolytic therapy.

Hypertension control in non–rt-PA candidates

For patients who are not candidates for thrombolysis with recombinant t-PA (rt-PA) and who have a systolic blood pressure of less than 220 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg in the absence of evidence of end-organ involvement (ie, pulmonary edema, aortic dissection, hypertensive encephalopathy), blood pressure should be monitored (without acute intervention) and stroke symptoms and complications (eg, increased ICP, seizures) should be treated.

For patients with a systolic blood pressure above 220 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mm Hg, labetalol (10-20 mg IV for 1-2 min) should be the initial drug of choice, unless a contraindication to its use exists. Dosing may be repeated or doubled every 10 minutes to a maximum dose of 300 mg.

Alternatively, nicardipine may be used for blood pressure control. Nicardipine is given intravenously at an initial rate of 5 mg/h and titrated to effect by increasing the infusion rate 2.5 mg/h every 5 minutes, to a maximum of 15 mg/h. Lastly, nitroprusside at 0.5 mcg/kg/min IV infusion may be used in the setting of continuous blood pressure monitoring. The goal of intervention is a reduction in blood pressure of 10-15%.

Hypertension control in rt-PA candidates

For patients who will be receiving rt-PA, systolic blood pressure greater than 185 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure greater than 110 mm Hg require intervention. Monitoring and control of blood pressure during and after thrombolytic administration are vital, because uncontrolled hypertension is associated with hemorrhagic complication.[28]

The initial drug of choice, labetalol (10-20 mg IV for 1-2 min), may be repeated (maximum dose 300 mg). One to 2 inches of transdermal nitropaste (see nitroglycerin topical) may also be used. As an alternative to these choices, nicardipine infusion at 5 mg/h, titrated up to a maximum dose of 15 mg/h, can be used.[19]

Monitoring of blood pressure is crucial; for the first 2 hours, blood pressure should be checked every 15 minutes, then every 30 minutes for 6 hours, and finally, every hour for 16 hours. The goal of therapy should be to reduce blood pressure by 15-25% in the first day, with continued blood pressure control during hospitalization.

For patients with systolic blood pressure of 185-230 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 110-120 mm Hg, labetalol is given at a dose of 10-20 mg IV over 1-2 minutes; the dose may be repeated every 10-20 minutes, up to 300 mg total, or an infusion rate of up to 2-8 mg/min may be used.[1]

For systolic blood pressure of greater than 230 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 121-140 mm Hg, labetalol at the above doses can be considered. However, nicardipine infusion administered at a rate of 5 mg/h, to a maximum of 15 mg/h, might be a better first choice. For difficult-to-control blood pressure, sodium nitroprusside can be considered.[1]

The use of sublingual nifedipine to lower blood pressure in the ED is discouraged, since extreme hypotension may result. Trials of nimodipine, initially thought to be beneficial given its vasodilatory effect as a calcium-channel blocker, have failed to demonstrate any beneficial outcome in comparison with placebo.[18]

Consensus agreement is that these blood pressure guidelines should be maintained in the face of other interventions to restore perfusion, such as intra-arterial thrombolysis.[1]

Table 3. Blood Pressure Management in Patients With Stroke*



View Table

See Table

Control of hypotension

Given the need to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow, severe hypotension should be managed in standard fashion with aggressive fluid resuscitation, a search for the etiology of hypotension, and, if necessary, vasopressor support. Evidence suggests that baseline systolic blood pressure below 100 mg Hg and diastolic blood pressure below 70 mm Hg correlate with a worse outcome.[25]

Further Outpatient Care

Poststroke outpatient care largely focuses on rehabilitation and prevention of recurrent stroke. Rehabilitation planning and initiation begins within the first day of the acute stroke. Recent research has demonstrated the benefits of early and aggressive mobilization.[29]

Additional Care

Referral to a physician with a special interest in stroke is ideal. Stroke care units with specially trained personnel exist and are said to show improved outcomes Comorbid medical problems need to be addressed. Assessments of swallow function prior to the reinstitution of oral feeding is recommended.[1] Patients should receive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, although the timing of institution of this therapy is unknown.

Medical/Legal Pitfalls

In patients with transient ischemic attacks, failure to recognize the potential for near term stroke, failure to perform a timely assessment for stroke risk factors, and failure to initiate primary and secondary stroke prevention exposes the patient to undue risk of stroke and exposes clinicians to potential litigation.[3]

What is the primary goal for the acute management of stroke?What is the role of glucose management in the acute management of stroke?How is hyperthermia treated during a stroke?What is the indication for supplemental oxygen in the acute management of stroke?What are optimal blood pressure targets during the acute management of stroke?What is the approach to acute management of stroke?What is the indication for thrombolytic therapy in the acute management of stroke?What are the options for thrombolytic therapy in acute management of stroke?When is rapid sequence intubation indicated in acute management of stroke?What should guide supplemental oxygen use in acute management of stroke?When is IV access and cardiac monitoring indicated in acute management of stroke?How is blood glucose controlled in acute management of stroke?What is the importance of patient positioning in the acute management of stroke?How is blood pressure controlled in acute management of stroke?How is hypertension controlled in the acute management of stroke when thrombolysis is contraindicated?How is hypertension controlled in patients receiving rt-PA for the acute management of stroke?How is hypotension controlled in acute management of stroke?What is the focus of outpatient care following the acute management of stroke?What referrals are indicated following the acute management of stroke?What are the medical and legal pitfalls in the acute management of stroke?

Author

Edward C Jauch, MD, MS, FAHA, FACEP, Chief of System Research, Mission Research Institute, Mission Health; Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University

Disclosure: Received grant/research funds from Genentech for site pi.

Coauthor(s)

Brett Kissela, MD, MS, Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Disclosure: Received honoraria from Medscape Education for an educational activity; Received fees for adjudication of adverse events for clinical trial, payment per event reviewed from AbbVie and Janssen. Work performed as anindependent contractor.

Brian Stettler, MD, Assistant Professor, Program Director, Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, and Faculty Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Team, University of Cincinnati

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Helmi L Lutsep, MD, Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine; Associate Director, OHSU Stroke Center

Disclosure: Medscape Neurology Editorial Advisory Board for: Stroke Adjudication Committee, CREST2; Physician Advisory Board for Coherex Medical; National Leader and Steering Committee Clinical Trial, Bristol Myers Squibb; Consultant, Abbott Vascular, Inc. .

Acknowledgements

Thomas A Kent, MD Professor and Director of Stroke Research and Education, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine; Chief of Neurology, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Thomas A Kent, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, New York Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Medicine, Sigma Xi, and Stroke Council of the American Heart Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Howard S Kirshner, MD Professor of Neurology, Psychiatry and Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vice Chairman, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Director, Vanderbilt Stroke Center; Program Director, Stroke Service, Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital; Consulting Staff, Department of Neurology, Nashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Howard S Kirshner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Neurological Association, American Society of Neurorehabilitation, National Stroke Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jennifer Franklin for her assistance in the updating of this article.

References

  1. [Guideline] Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007 May. 38(5):1655-711. [View Abstract]
  2. Bruno A, Kent TA, Coull BM, Shankar RR, Saha C, Becker KJ, et al. Treatment of hyperglycemia in ischemic stroke (THIS): a randomized pilot trial. Stroke. 2008 Feb. 39(2):384-9. [View Abstract]
  3. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2011 Jan. 42(1):227-76. [View Abstract]
  4. Adams H, Adams R, Del Zoppo G, Goldstein LB. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: 2005 guidelines update a scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2005 Apr. 36(4):916-23. [View Abstract]
  5. [Guideline] Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC, et al. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015 Oct. 46 (10):3020-35. [View Abstract]
  6. Obach V, Oleaga L, Urra X, Macho J, Amaro S, Capurro S, et al. Multimodal CT-Assisted Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Cohort Study. Stroke. 2011 Apr. 42(4):1129-31. [View Abstract]
  7. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, Kemp S, Schlaug G, Skalabrin E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006 Nov. 60(5):508-17. [View Abstract]
  8. Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. Stroke. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with IV desmoteplase. 2005. 36:66 -73.
  9. Albers GW, von Kummer R, Truelsen T, Jensen JK, Ravn GM, Grønning BA, et al. Safety and efficacy of desmoteplase given 3-9 h after ischaemic stroke in patients with occlusion or high-grade stenosis in major cerebral arteries (DIAS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun. 14 (6):575-84. [View Abstract]
  10. Muchada M, Rubiera M, Rodriguez-Luna D, Pagola J, Flores A, Kallas J, et al. Baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale-adjusted time window for intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014 Apr. 45(4):1059-63. [View Abstract]
  11. Abilleira S, Cardona P, Ribó M, Millán M, Obach V, Roquer J, et al. Outcomes of a contemporary cohort of 536 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Stroke. 2014 Apr. 45(4):1046-52. [View Abstract]
  12. Jovin TG, Liebeskind DS, Gupta R, Rymer M, Rai A, Zaidat OO, et al. Imaging-Based Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Proximal Intracranial Anterior Circulation Occlusion Treated Beyond 8 Hours From Time Last Seen Well: Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of 237 Consecutive Patients. Stroke. 2011 Aug. 42(8):2206-11. [View Abstract]
  13. González RG. Imaging-guided acute ischemic stroke therapy: From "time is brain" to "physiology is brain". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr. 27(4):728-35. [View Abstract]
  14. Ingall TJ, O'Fallon WM, Asplund K, Goldfrank LR, Hertzberg VS, Louis TA, et al. Findings from the reanalysis of the NINDS tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke treatment trial. Stroke. 2004 Oct. 35(10):2418-24. [View Abstract]
  15. Sims JR, Rordorf G, Smith EE, Koroshetz WJ, Lev MH, Buonanno F, et al. Arterial occlusion revealed by CT angiography predicts NIH stroke score and acute outcomes after IV tPA treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Feb. 26(2):246-51. [View Abstract]
  16. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick JP, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 2004 Mar 6. 363(9411):768-74. [View Abstract]
  17. Saposnik G, Fang J, Kapral MK, Tu JV, Mamdani M, Austin P, et al. The iScore predicts effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012 May. 43(5):1315-22. [View Abstract]
  18. Milhaud D, Popp J, Thouvenot E, Heroum C, Bonafé A. Mechanical ventilation in ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004 Jul-Aug. 13(4):183-8. [View Abstract]
  19. Krieger D, Hacke W. The intensive care of the stroke patient. In: Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.
  20. Bruno A, Levine SR, Frankel MR, Brott TG, Lin Y, Tilley BC, et al. Admission glucose level and clinical outcomes in the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial. Neurology. 2002 Sep 10. 59(5):669-74. [View Abstract]
  21. Bruno A, Biller J, Adams HP Jr, Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Williams LS, et al. Acute blood glucose level and outcome from ischemic stroke. Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. Neurology. 1999 Jan 15. 52(2):280-4. [View Abstract]
  22. Baird TA, Parsons MW, Phanh T, Butcher KS, Desmond PM, Tress BM, et al. Persistent poststroke hyperglycemia is independently associated with infarct expansion and worse clinical outcome. Stroke. 2003 Sep. 34(9):2208-14. [View Abstract]
  23. Anderson CS, Arima H, Lavados P, Billot L, Hackett ML, Olavarría VV, et al. Cluster-Randomized, Crossover Trial of Head Positioning in Acute Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22. 376 (25):2437-2447. [View Abstract]
  24. Wojner-Alexander AW, Garami Z, Chernyshev OY, Alexandrov AV. Heads down: flat positioning improves blood flow velocity in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005 Apr 26. 64(8):1354-7. [View Abstract]
  25. Castillo J, Leira R, García MM, Serena J, Blanco M, Dávalos A. Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. Stroke. 2004 Feb. 35(2):520-6. [View Abstract]
  26. Sandset EC, Bath PM, Boysen G, Jatuzis D, Kõrv J, Lüders S, et al. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2011 Feb 26. 377(9767):741-50. [View Abstract]
  27. Sandset EC, Murray GD, Bath PM, Kjeldsen SE, Berge E. Relation between change in blood pressure in acute stroke and risk of early adverse events and poor outcome. Stroke. 2012 Aug. 43(8):2108-14. [View Abstract]
  28. The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14. 333(24):1581-7. [View Abstract]
  29. Cumming TB, Thrift AG, Collier JM, Churilov L, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, et al. Very early mobilization after stroke fast-tracks return to walking: further results from the phase II AVERT randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2011 Jan. 42(1):153-8. [View Abstract]
  30. Baker WL, Colby JA, Tongbram V, Talati R, Silverman IE, White CM, et al. Neurothrombectomy devices for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: state of the evidence. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 15. 154(4):243-52. [View Abstract]
  31. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008 May 10. 371(9624):1612-23. [View Abstract]
  32. Derex L, Tomsick TA, Brott TG, Lewandowski CA, Frankel MR, Clark W, et al. Outcome of stroke patients without angiographically revealed arterial occlusion within four hours of symptom onset. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Apr. 22(4):685-90. [View Abstract]
Time Interval Time Target
Door to doctor10 min
Access to neurologic expertise15 min
Door to CT scan completion25 min
Door to CT scan interpretation45 min
Door to treatment60 min
Admission to stroke unit or ICU3 h
*National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke



**Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines



Blood glucose Treat hypoglycemia with D50



Treat hyperglycemia with insulin if serum glucose >200 mg/dL



Blood pressureSee recommendations for thrombolysis candidates and noncandidates (Table 3)
Cardiac monitorContinuous monitoring for ischemic changes or atrial fibrillation
Intravenous fluidsAvoid D5W and excessive fluid administration



IV isotonic sodium chloride solution at 50 mL/h unless otherwise indicated



Oral intakeNPO initially; aspiration risk is great, avoid oral intake until swallowing assessed
OxygenSupplement if indicated (Sa02< 94%)
TemperatureAvoid hyperthermia; use oral or rectal acetaminophen and cooling blankets as needed
  Blood Pressure Treatment
Candidates for fibrinolysis Pretreatment:



SBP >185 or DBP >110 mm Hg



Labetalol 10-20 mg IVP repeated every 10-20 minutes



or



Nicardipine 5 mg/h, titrate by 2.5 mg/h every 5-15 min, maximum 15 mg/h; when desired blood pressure reached, lower to 3 mg/h or



Enalapril 1.25 mg IVP



 Posttreatment:



DBP >140 mm Hg



SBP >230 mm Hg or



DBP 121-140 mm Hg



SBP 180-230 mm Hg or DBP 105-120 mm Hg



Sodium nitroprusside (0.5 mcg/kg/min)



Labetalol 10-20 mg IVP and consider labetalol infusion at 1-2 mg/min or nicardipine 5 mg/h IV infusion and titrate



or



Nicardipine 5 mg/h, titrate by 2.5 mg/h every 5-15 min, maximum 15 mg/h; when desired blood pressure reached, lower to 3 mg/h or



Labetalol 10 mg IVP, may repeat and double every 10 min up to maximum dose of 300 mg



Noncandidates for fibrinolysis DBP >140 mm Hg



SBP >220 or



DBP 121-140 mm Hg or



MAP >130 mm Hg



SBP < 220 mm Hg or



DBP 105-120 mm Hg or



MAP < 130 mm Hg



Sodium nitroprusside 0.5 mcg/kg/min; may reduce approximately 10-20%



Labetalol 10-20 mg IVP over 1-2 min; may repeat and double every 10 min up to maximum dose of 150 mg or nicardipine 5 mg/h IV infusion and titrate



or



Nicardipine 5 mg/h, titrate by 2.5 mg/h every 5-15 min, maximum 15 mg/h; when desired blood pressure reached, lower to 3 mg/h



Antihypertensive therapy indicated only if acute myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, severe CHF, or hypertensive encephalopathy present



*Adapted from 2005 Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines and 2007 American Stroke Association Scientific Statement



Abbreviations: SBP - systolic blood pressure; DBP - diastolic blood pressure; IVP - IV push; MAP - mean arterial pressure