Churg-Strauss Disease

Back

Background

Churg-Strauss disease (CSD) is one of three important fibrinoid, necrotizing, inflammatory leukocytoclastic systemic small-vessel vasculitides that are associated with antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCAs). Of these three conditions, Churg-Strauss disease is the least commonly encountered. The others are Wegener granulomatosis (WG) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Although these conditions are not thought to be directly infectious, microbial superantigens may play a role in provoking the onset of the dysregulated immune response that gives rise to these conditions.[1]

Sir William Osler possibly described the clinical aspects of Churg-Strauss disease in 1900. However, it was not until 1951 that Jacob Churg and Lotte Strauss of Sweden clearly identified the clinical and pathological findings as representative of a distinct entity, setting it apart from polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). They reported 13 individuals who initially manifested severe asthma and subsequently developed fever, eosinophilia, cardiac and renal failure, and peripheral neuropathy.[2] Most also developed pulmonary infiltrates, sinusitis, hypertension, abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, and skin changes including purpura and subcutaneous nodules. That 11 of the 13 individuals described by Churg and Strauss in their 1951 paper had died of Churg-Strauss disease is not surprising since corticosteroids were only introduced into medical practice in 1951 and did not become readily available for use in medicine until suitable synthetic preparations were prepared.

Because most of the individuals they described had died, Churg and Strauss concentrated particular attention on the distinctive histologic features of CSD. Chumbley and associates used the criteria of Churg and Strauss in their Mayo Clinic series.[3]

Subsequent attempts to refine diagnostic criteria have incorporated more clinical features.[4, 5, 6] The fact that 3 or more sets of criteria are in existence reflect the fact that no single clinical feature is pathognomonic and no discrete measurable biological marker has been identified for this condition. As noted, histologic distinction of Churg-Strauss from a condition that it closely resembled clinically, polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), was particularly important in establishing CSD as a discrete entity. Pathological investigation has established that PAN predominantly affects both medium-sized blood vessels and some small arteries, though it tends to spare capillaries, arterioles, and venules. This tendency is shared with Kawasaki disease.

Churg-Strauss disease chiefly affects small vessels (capillaries, venules, arterioles) by the development of eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation of the respiratory tract and small vessels.[6] However, Lie[7] has emphasized the fact that Churg-Strauss disease (and for that matter WG and MPA) may not be restricted to small-vessel vasculitis, a histological fact that is also acknowledged in the Jennette et al[6] "international consensus criteria", which state that CSD, WG, and MPA may involve the medium-sized vessels that are more characteristic targets of PAN.

The identification of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)[1] provided a sensitive, although nonspecific, marker for a particular group of systemic vasculitides including CSD. ANCA with a cytoplasmic staining pattern (cANCA), largely specific for the immunogenic epitopes of antiproteinase 3, was shown to have 98% sensitivity and high specificity for active clinically identified cases of Wegener granulomatosis.[8] ANCA with a perinuclear staining pattern (pANCA) was also identified and shown to have antigenic specificity for epitopes expressed by myeloperoxidase (MPO) as well as other possible epitopes. pANCA is an important marker for CSD,[9, 10] though not as specific as cANCA is for WG. pANCA may also be found in WG, MPA, and PAN.[8, 9, 11, 10]

ANCA provides considerable value in supporting the diagnosis of clinically classified ANCA-related illnesses. Thus, for example, the finding of pANCA in a systemic vasculitic condition arising initially as an asthmatic condition and found to also manifest tissue and blood eosinophilia makes a strong case for the diagnosis of CSD (which invariably involves the lungs).

CSD also has a reasonably characteristic disease evolution, and histologic demonstration of the distinctive pattern of eosinophilic vasculitis of small and some medium-sized vessels results in an even more secure diagnosis. Nonetheless, note that occasional examples of diseases that straddle the boundaries between PAN, WG, MPA, and Churg-Strauss disease are encountered for which it is difficult with certainty which label is most appropriate. For this reason, a recent classification system by Watts and Scott combined these particular entities under the general heading primary systemic vasculitides.[12]

ANCA assays have an even more definitive role in distinguishing the ANCA-related vasculitides from non-ANCA immune complex–associated small-vessel vasculitides such as Schönlein-Henoch purpura (SHP), essential cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (ECV), lupus vasculitis, serum sickness vasculitis, and infection-induced immune complex vasculitis. Churg-Strauss disease also has considerable overlap with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. In such instances, the distinction of Churg-Strauss from these various other conditions, particularly those that share ANCA positivity, is usually made on the basis of prodromal asthma indicative of Churg-Strauss disease. In instances where the kidney is involved, ANCA-positive vasculitides also share, in distinction to other small-vessel vasculitides, the presence of pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis.

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) closely resembles Churg-Strauss disease, differing particularly in that the prodromal asthmatic phase is absent. IHES is defined by (1) peripheral eosinophil count greater than 1500/µL for at least 6 months, (2) evidence of characteristic organ involvement, and (3) absence of other known cause. It affects men aged 20-50 years.

The initial manifestations of IHES are cardiac, consisting of eosinophilic myocarditis with endocardial damage and confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy. Restrictive cardiomyopathy may ensue as thrombosis develops, promoted by the damaged endocardial surface. Fibrosis then occurs. Mitral or tricuspid incompetence may develop as a result of fibrotic degeneration of the chordae tendineae. In some instances, dilated cardiomyopathy develops.

Cardioembolic disease in IHES may produce neurologic manifestations, but a primary encephalopathy has also been described. Sensory or mixed sensorimotor peripheral polyneuropathy, closely resembling that found in Churg-Strauss disease, may develop in a symmetrical or asymmetrical distribution. Mononeuropathy multiplex may also develop. Although prodromal asthma is not a feature, as many as 40% of patients with IHES manifest a persistent, dry cough at some stage of illness. Pulmonary dysfunction may result from cardiac failure or cardiogenic pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary infiltrates may be found in as many as 30% of cases of IHES, tending not to be peripheral. Parenchymal eosinophilic infiltration may be found and, rarely, eosinophilic pleural effusions develop. Diarrhea complicates about 20% of cases, while eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, or colitis occasionally has been reported. Dermatologic manifestations may include urticaria, angioedema, or erythematous pruritic papules and nodules. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgias, or joint effusions are occasional complications.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of Churg-Strauss disease, particularly the triggering circumstances, is not well understood. In their original description of ANCAs, Daives and associates[1] suggested that arboviral infection-related superantigens might stimulate the production of ANCAs that attacked host tissues because of molecular mimicry or some other abnormality of immune tolerance. Triggering of these vasculitides by infection has remained a pathophysiological consideration.[13] ANCAs in part mediate vascular endothelial injury in Churg-Strauss disease, as they do in PAN, MPA, and WG. In these various conditions, ANCAs may promote polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell adherence to vascular endothelial cells, with ensuing lytic vascular endothelial injury. An independent or adjuvant role in this activation may be played by tumor necrosis factor (TNF).

Studies of affected peripheral nerve tissues show that once the stage of epineural necrotic vasculitis has been achieved, activated cytotoxic T-lymphocyte clones (CD8+ suppressor and cytotoxic and CD4+ helper cells) begin to outnumber eosinophils and predominate in the inflammatory exudate. Occasionally, CD20+ B lymphocytes are found in the inflammatory exudate, and less prominent deposits of immunoglobulin (IgG), immunoglobulin E (IgE), and C3d antibodies may also be detected.

Cytokines undoubtedly participate in this autoimmune process. Patients with CSD have markedly increased serum levels of interferon alpha and interleukin 2 (IL-2) and moderate increases of TNF-alpha and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1beta) similar to those observed in PAN. Elevations of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations have been shown to precede the rise in serum rheumatoid factors that may accompany the onset of an exacerbation of Churg-Strauss vasculitis. Thus, IL-6 may be an important triggering factor. The rheumatoid factors are chiefly of IgG and immunoglobulin M (IgM) classes, rather than immunoglobulin A (IgA) or IgE.[14]

Typically (approximately 70% of clinically ascertained cases), pANCAs (directed against myeloperoxidase) are found in patients with Churg-Strauss disease. These perinuclear deposits appear as azurophilic granules. pANCA titers in individuals with CSD have been shown to correlate with disease severity; falling titers have been used as indicators of the success or failure of immunosuppressive treatments and, conversely, rising titers have been regarded as indicative of disease exacerbation.[15]

Antibodies with this pattern of staining and similar antigenic specificity are also found in the uncertainly classified entity microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Recent work suggests that a mutation in exon 11 of the CD18 gene may be permissive of the elaboration of antimyeloperoxidase antibodies in either of these 2 conditions.

In Wegener granulomatosis, on the other hand, the presence of cANCAs with antigenic specificity for proteinase-3 is characteristic. A case of one patient with pANCAs directed against myeloperoxidase and cANCAs against proteinase-3 has been reported; the patient manifested a combination of clinical characteristics suggesting both Churg-Strauss disease and temporal arteritis.

These immunologic disturbances may provoke the translocation of proteinase-3 from within the azurophilic granules of PMN cells to the surface of the cell membrane. The attachment of PMN cells to the endothelial surface likely is enhanced by cytokine-mediated induction of adhesion molecules (eg, lymphocyte function-associated protein 1, IL adhesion molecule 1, endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule 1). Anti-endothelial cell antibodies, detectable in many different primary vasculitic conditions as well as in systemic autoimmune disease with a vasculitic component, may play a role in Churg-Strauss disease.

Abnormal expression of CD95 cellular receptors (producing a soluble splice variant rather than the usual membrane-bound isoform) may participate in the pathogenesis of Churg-Strauss disease. The result is impairment of normal apoptotic processes whereby lymphocytes and eosinophils are eliminated. This permits abnormal oligoclonal expansion of specific T-cell clones, which may mediate cellular injury. The soluble CD95 isoform has been termed eosinophil survival factor.

CSD onset has been associated with immunotherapy for asthma in epidemiologic studies. Immunization with allergen extracts has been suggested to provoke onset of CSD. A particularly important form of immunotherapy in asthma has been the use of drugs designed to reduce leukotriene-mediated airway obstruction.[16, 17, 18] Onset of CSD after the use of antileukotrienes for the treatment of asthma has suggested that these agents may provoke an idiosyncratic drug-induced form of CSD. In particular, an association has been detected with the use of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor type-1 (CysLT1) antagonists (eg, zafirlukast, pranlukast, montelukast) and onset of CSD.[19] However, some authorities appear to regard this association as the result of the "unmasking" of preexisting CSD, as the introduction of leukotriene inhibitors permits corticosteroid doses to be reduced.[20, 19, 21, 18, 22, 23]

On the other hand, zafirlukast treatment has been associated with idiosyncratic development of drug-induced lupus; hence, a primary role for such agents in induction of CSD must also be considered.[24] Despite some continued degree of etiologic uncertainty, it can be said that it remains particularly important to consider unmasked CSD as the underlying cause of CSD-related deterioration in patients with severe asthma undergoing steroid dosage-reduction during a period of antileukotriene therapy–associated improvement in pulmonary disease.

Antiasthmatic agents, such as beclomethasone, cromolyn sodium, or other drugs, may provoke pulmonary eosinophilia. However, it is important to carefully distinguish pulmonary eosinophilia from CSD. Pulmonary disease with eosinophilia has been associated with the use of crack-cocaine.[25, 26]

Pathology

Unlike most noninfectious vasculitides, Churg-Strauss disease is fairly distinctive in its pathology, owing to the abundance of eosinophils in the inflammatory perivenular exudate. However, CSD is a condition with a wide variety of presentations and associated signs and symptoms and other entities may provoke eosinophilic vasculitis. Therefore, CSD remains a clinicopathologic rather than a histopathologic entity.

Eosinophilic infiltration of the upper respiratory tracts and lungs is the most common finding in CSD, while similar infiltrative pathology is also often found in the gastrointestinal tract. The infiltrative appearance may change into eosinophilic vasculitis with worsening disease. Such clinical manifestations as weight loss, fever, and myalgia are common diagnostic clues to the possibility that CSD is in evolution. These manifestations are found in more than half of all individuals with CSD. Sinusitis has similar prevalence. The characteristic vasculopathy of CSD is predominantly an arteriopathy, tending to affect small- and medium-sized arteries much more than arterioles, veins, or capillaries. This predilection is also found in PAN and some other conditions. However, the predominance of eosinophils sets CSD apart from these other conditions. Epithelioid and giant cells are also found in the inflammatory exudate of patients with CSD.

The inflammatory arteriopathy evolves into granulomatous fibrinoid necrosis of the vascular media. The result of this process includes the development of collagenolytic or necrobiotic noninfectious granulomata. The granulomatous material surrounds altered vascular elastic fibers and collagen as well as acellular pigmented debris, which is helpful in pathologically distinguishing one form of granulomatous vasculitis from another. CSD is associated with "red" collagenolytic granulomas.

The lungs are the chief organs involved in patients with Churg-Strauss vasculopathy, and they almost invariably develop regions of angiopathy as the disease progresses. In a series of 96 individuals with CSD, asthma was the first evidence of CSD in 92%; one third developed asthma severe enough to require oral corticosteroid administration.[27] Typical manifestations include granuloma formation, which occurs within vascular walls and in adjacent pulmonary tissues. Similar angiopathic changes develop in the heart (approximately 85%), skin (70%), peripheral nervous system (66%), central nervous system (60%), kidneys (40%), gastrointestinal tract (40%), and musculoskeletal system (20%).

Vasculitic involvement of the heart was found in as many as 85% of cases described in early reports, typically manifesting as low-output congestive cardiac failure. However, myocardial involvement (which was associated with poor prognosis) was identified in only 14% of the large series of patients with CSD reported by Guillevin et al.[27] Churg-Straus disease should be considered in adults with asthma and eosinophilia who develop chest pain, shortness of breath, and cardiogenic shock.[28]

Skin and nervous tissues are the systems next most commonly involved in patients with Churg-Strauss disease.

Approximately 60% of adults with Churg-Strauss disease develop CNS vasculitis. This is unlike PAN, in which CNS manifestations are rare. However, CNS vasculitis has not been reported in children with Churg-Strauss disease. It does occur in adolescents, albeit rarely.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction develops in 30-60% of individuals with CSD (prevalence higher in earlier series than in more recent case series). Most commonly, this takes the form of mesenteric vasculitis, similar to that seen in PAN. The most common manifestations are bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain.

Arteritis of medium-sized blood vessels of the kidneys develops in 20-50% of cases. However, hypertension is less common in Churg-Strauss disease than in PAN.

Testicular pain, with or without epididymitis, may occur in men with Churg-Strauss disease.

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Churg-Strauss disease is said to account for slightly more than 2% of all vasculitic illnesses. The various primary systemic vasculitides (Churg-Strauss disease, PAN, microscopic polyangiitis, Wegener granulomatosis) together are estimated by Watts et al to affect 15-25 individuals per million individuals in North America annually.[12]

International

Little information is available concerning international variation in the prevalence or incidence of Churg-Strauss disease.

Mortality/Morbidity

See the list below:

Race

Few data are available regarding racial variations in occurrence or severity of Churg-Strauss disease. In some studies, no racial predilection has been suggested; in others, without clear documentation, it has been suggested that Churg-Strauss disease shares with other systemic vasculitides (eg, Wegener granulomatosis) a tendency toward greater prevalence in whites or individuals of Nordic ancestry.[31] Clearly additional data are necessary, using data of greater refinement entailing the casting of a wide socioeconomic and geographic net and greater precision in characterizing populations at risk than what may be based upon such tentative and possibly irrelevant indirect genetic markers as skin pigmentation. Nonetheless, there is some support in selected diseases for the notion that disease prevalence or severity for certain autoimmune conditions may be greater in individuals with heavier skin pigmentation.

Sex

As with a number of other primary systemic vasculitides, males are slightly more likely than females to develop Churg-Strauss disease. The male-to-female ratio for Churg-Strauss disease is estimated by some to be approximately 1.4:1, similar to the sex-related risk ratio for the combined class of Churg-Strauss disease, PAN, microscopic polyangiitis, and Wegener granulomatosis.

A higher risk ratio for males is found for one of the important differential considerations, hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). HES is likely a heterogeneous collection of very severe diseases that are very rare and tend to occur in persons aged 20-50 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 9:1. It is not linked with asthma, but pulmonary disease may be found particularly on the basis of cardiac disease or pulmonary embolization.

Age

Most individuals with Churg-Strauss disease experience the onset of disease in the age range of 15-69 years. Peak risk for vasculitic manifestations is in the middle of the fourth decade of life. Thus, the vasculitic stages of Churg-Strauss disease tend to develop at earlier ages than other primary systemic vasculitides, for which the average age of occurrence is about 60-65 years.

History

Lanham divided the clinical evolution of Churg-Strauss disease into 3 phases.[4]

First phase

The first phase is prodromal to the 2 subsequent vasculitic phases. Bronchial asthma is the initial disease manifestation in as many as 80-90% of cases of Churg-Strauss disease.[27] The asthma is severe in as many as one third of all patients. An additional 6% will develop asthma within a year of onset of manifestations in other organ systems. In most series, bronchial asthma is the first clinical feature and is the nearly constant finding of the first phase, preceding fever or eosinophilia. Some authorities have estimated that less than 3% of all individuals who develop CSD have no asthma as an element of their CSD.

Second phase

See the list below:

Third phase

Months to many years of such intermittent bouts precede the third phase, that of systemic vasculitis. Patients with continued reactive airway manifestations may experience remission, often to a remarkable extent, at the onset of this third phase of Churg-Strauss disease. As vasculitis develops and worsens, weight loss may be noted.

Physical

See the list below:

Causes

See the list below:

Laboratory Studies

See the list below:

Imaging Studies

See the list below:

Other Tests

See the list below:

Procedures

See the list below:

Histologic Findings

See the list below:

Medical Care

Medical management of cardiovascular, cardiac, renal, and gastrointestinal complications of Churg-Strauss disease falls under the purview of subspecialty consultation. Drugs used in the treatment of Churg-Strauss disease are described in Medication.

Surgical Care

See the list below:

Consultations

See the list below:

Diet

No dietary factors are clearly known to assist in the management of Churg-Strauss disease, except as are related to the management of congestive heart failure, renal failure, or gastrointestinal complications. The management of these factors falls under the purview of subspecialists involved in the care of these organ systems.

Activity

No clear evidence suggests that particular activities influence the course of the illness once it is established. Environmental exposures and medical treatment of asthma that may influence the chances for development of Churg-Strauss disease are discussed in Causes.

Medication Summary

For most patients, Churg-Strauss disease (CSD) is a readily treatable illness, and reports over the past few decades have shown better outcomes than were demonstrated in earlier case series. In part, this may be due to the inclusion of milder cases due to improved recognition. In particular, diagnostic sensitivity has been greatest for individuals whose initial presentation is with asthma (90% of cases in some case series). However, a major factor has been the availability of corticosteroids. Milder CSD may respond well to orally administered corticosteroids.

The recommended initial medications for treatment of severe manifestations of CSD, including patients with CSD–related peripheral neuritis, are corticosteroids, which are administered at high doses. Intravenous administration of methylprednisolone at doses of 15 mg/kg on 1-3 successive mornings is one of the most common initial approaches to severe cases. Rapid correction of eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and elevations of sedimentation rate and LDH are characteristic of CSD. Failure to provoke such corrections early in the course of therapy is associated with elevated risk for poor long-term outcome.

Intravenous treatment is followed by oral prednisone at a dose of approximately 1 mg/kg/d (usual, but absolute maximal daily dose should not exceed 80 mg/d), with ensuing taper once clinical improvement is noted.

Many patients with CSD manifest a favorable response to this monotherapeutic approach within a few days; however, in many cases, persistence of asthma prevents oral prednisone from being tapered to doses lower than 10-15 mg/d. In milder cases, initial treatment can be undertaken with the administration of oral corticosteroids at doses of 1 mg/kg/d (60 mg/d is the usual but not absolute maximal dose).

Corticosteroid treatment, whether oral or intravenous, has been combined with plasma exchange or plasmapheresis for cases that were difficult to treat. This combination appears to have conferred benefit in some patients. Some patients have demonstrated marked clinical improvement, accompanied by declining circulating pANCA titers, after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Some patients have been treated, either initially or during a subsequent phase of therapy, with the combination of daily oral prednisone and cyclophosphamide. This approach may enhance disease control and may have a sparing effect upon steroid dosage, thus diminishing steroid-related adverse effects. Prednisone taper in patients responding to the combined therapy can be undertaken after approximately 2 weeks.

The combination of high-dose corticosteroids and dapsone has been used in patients with severe Churg-Strauss disease and has proven effective in instances of Churg-Strauss myocarditis.[28] Corticosteroid doses may be reduced after improvement in myocarditis is achieved.

Cyclophosphamide treatment (titrated to the neutrophil count) generally is continued for 6-12 months after remission is established. Pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in combination with corticosteroids appears to diminish the risk for various adverse effects seen in patients receiving oral cyclophosphamide daily. This form of therapy is also considered in patients whose disease responds poorly to corticosteroids. Dose, frequency, and total number of cyclophosphamide pulses are adjusted to disease response, blood counts, and renal function. Efficacy of this form of therapy is not, as yet, fully established.

Usually, collaborating with physicians specializing in renal medicine is the best way to undertake this form of therapy. Protocols must be utilized to ensure that renal function is preserved with regard to additionally administered medications and hydration. These protocols entail intense hydration and coadministration of 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna). Some studies have used initial pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide at doses as high as 0.6 g/m2 of body surface, but this dose must be reduced in accordance with the degree of impairment of renal function exhibited by the patient.

Azathioprine, methotrexate, or ribavirin have possible roles in the treatment of CSD, but these drugs require additional study and should not be used without the participation of a subspecialist who can provide recommendations concerning dosage, anticipated benefits, and adverse effects.

The suggestion has been made that males with CSD might attain some benefit from treatment with thalidomide. This approach requires considerable additional study and the participation of an expert who can provide information concerning appropriate dosage, anticipated benefits, and adverse effects. The use of thalidomide is contraindicated in women of childbearing age. None of the drugs noted in this paragraph should be used without the collaboration of subspecialists skilled in their use and familiar with the relative indications, dosage adjustments, potential benefits, and adverse effects. Therefore, none of these agents are reviewed in the following Medication section because the complex issues entailed with their use fall beyond the scope of this article.

Methylprednisolone (Medrol, Solu-Medrol, Depo-Medrol)

Clinical Context:  Moderate or severe cases often treated for 1-3 d with IV methylprednisolone (or equivalent dose of some other anti-inflammatory corticosteroid). Administer initial dose under close supervision, since rare instances of anaphylaxis after initial dose have been reported.

Prednisone (Sterapred)

Clinical Context:  Useful in initial management of mild cases (especially for asthma) and in taper and maintenance phases of therapy for Churg-Strauss disease.

Class Summary

These medications decrease the activity of the immune system in inflammatory reactions. The immune system is of critical importance in the pathophysiology of this disease.

Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan)

Clinical Context:  Synthetic drug, chemically related to nitrogen mustards, developed as antineoplastic agent. Biotransformed in liver, where constituent alkylating metabolites activated. These activated compounds interfere with growth of susceptible rapidly proliferating cells. Mechanism of action with regard to tumor cells may involve cross-linking of tumor cell DNA.

Class Summary

These agents inhibit cell growth and proliferation, reducing the activity of the immune system.

Further Outpatient Care

See the list below:

Further Inpatient Care

See the list below:

Deterrence/Prevention

See the list below:

Complications

See the list below:

Prognosis

See the list below:

Author

Robert Stanley Rust, Jr, MD, MA, Former Thomas E Worrell Jr Professor of Epileptology and Neurology, Co-Director of FE Dreifuss Child Neurology and Epilepsy Clinics, Director, Child Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine; Chair-Elect, Child Neurology Section, American Academy of Neurology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Kenneth J Mack, MD, PhD, Senior Associate Consultant, Department of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Mayo Clinic

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Amy Kao, MD, Attending Neurologist, Children's National Medical Center

Disclosure: Have stock (managed by a financial services company) in healthcare companies including Allergan, Cellectar Biosciences, CVS Health, Danaher Corp, Johnson & Johnson.

Additional Contributors

Robert J Baumann, MD, Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Davies DJ, Moran JE. Segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis with antineutrophil antibody: possible arbovirus aetiology?. BMJ. 1982. 285:606.
  2. Churg J, Strauss L. Allergic granulomatosis, allergic angiitis, and periarteritis nodosa. Am J Pathol. 1951 Mar-Apr. 27(2):277-301. [View Abstract]
  3. Chumbley LC, Harrison EG Jr, DeRemee RA. Allergic granulomatosis and angiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome). Report and analysis of 30 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Aug. 52(8):477-84. [View Abstract]
  4. Lanham JG. Churg-Strauss syndrome. Br J Hosp Med. 1992 May 6-19. 47(9):667-73. [View Abstract]
  5. Masi AT, Hunder GG, Lie JT, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Churg-Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and angiitis). Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug. 33(8):1094-100. [View Abstract]
  6. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Feb. 37(2):187-92. [View Abstract]
  7. Lie JT. Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis: plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Feb. 37(2):181-6. [View Abstract]
  8. Kallenberg CG, Brouwer E, Weening JJ, Tervaert JW. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: current diagnostic and pathophysiological potential. Kidney Int. 1994 Jul. 46(1):1-15. [View Abstract]
  9. Cohen P, Guillevin L, Baril L, Lhote F, Noel LH, Lesavre P. Persistence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in asymptomatic patients with systemic polyarteritis nodosa or Churg-Strauss syndrome: follow-up of 53 patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1995 Mar-Apr. 13(2):193-8. [View Abstract]
  10. Tervaert JW, Goldschmeding R, Elema JD, von dem Borne AE, Kallenberg CG. Antimyeloperoxidase antibodies in the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Thorax. 1991 Jan. 46(1):70-1. [View Abstract]
  11. Tervaert JW, Goldschmeding R, Elema JD, et al. Association of autoantibodies to myeloperoxidase with different forms of vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug. 33(8):1264-72. [View Abstract]
  12. Watts RA, Scott DG. Classification and epidemiology of the vasculitides. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1997 May. 11(2):191-217. [View Abstract]
  13. Capizzi SA, Specks U. Does infection play a role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary vasculitis?. Semin Respir Infect. 2003 Mar. 18(1):17-22. [View Abstract]
  14. Ramentol-Sintas M, Martínez-Valle F, Solans-Laqué R. Churg-Strauss Syndrome: An evolving paradigm. Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec. 12(2):235-40. [View Abstract]
  15. Wiik A. Autoantibodies in vasculitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003. 5(3):147-52. [View Abstract]
  16. Arm JP, Lee TH. Sulphidopeptide leukotrienes in asthma. Clin Sci (Lond). 1993 May. 84(5):501-10. [View Abstract]
  17. Drazen JM, Israel E. Should antileukotriene therapies be used instead of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma? Yes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec. 158(6):1697-8. [View Abstract]
  18. Drazen JM, Israel E, O'Byrne PM. Treatment of asthma with drugs modifying the leukotriene pathway. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 21. 340(3):197-206. [View Abstract]
  19. Wechsler ME, Garpestad E, Flier SR, et al. Pulmonary infiltrates, eosinophilia, and cardiomyopathy following corticosteroid withdrawal in patients with asthma receiving zafirlukast. JAMA. 1998 Feb 11. 279(6):455-7. [View Abstract]
  20. Churg A, Brallas M, Cronin SR, Churg J. Formes frustes of Churg-Strauss syndrome. Chest. 1995 Aug. 108(2):320-3. [View Abstract]
  21. D'Cruz DP, Barnes NC, Lockwood CM. Difficult asthma or Churg-Strauss syndrome?. BMJ. 1999 Feb 20. 318(7182):475-6. [View Abstract]
  22. Garcia-Marcos L, Schuster A, Perez-Yarza EG. Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma. Drug Saf. 2003. 26(7):483-518. [View Abstract]
  23. Kemp JP. Recent advances in the management of asthma using leukotriene modifiers. Am J Respir Med. 2003. 2(2):139-56. [View Abstract]
  24. Finkel TH, Hunter DJ, Paisley JE, Finkel RS, Larsen GL. Drug-induced lupus in a child after treatment with zafirlukast (Accolate). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar. 103(3 Pt 1):533-4. [View Abstract]
  25. Haim DY, Lippmann ML, Goldberg SK, Walkenstein MD. The pulmonary complications of crack cocaine. A comprehensive review. Chest. 1995 Jan. 107(1):233-40. [View Abstract]
  26. Orriols R, Munoz X, Ferrer J, Huget P, Morell F. Cocaine-induced Churg-Strauss vasculitis. Eur Respir J. 1996 Jan. 9(1):175-7. [View Abstract]
  27. Guillevin L, Cohen P, Gayraud M, Lhote F, Jarrousse B, Casassus P. Churg-Strauss syndrome. Clinical study and long-term follow-up of 96 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999 Jan. 78(1):26-37. [View Abstract]
  28. Shanks M, Ignaszewski AP, Chan SY, Allard MF. Churg-Strauss syndrome with myocarditis manifesting as acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: case report and review of the literature. Can J Cardiol. 2003 Sep. 19(10):1184-8. [View Abstract]
  29. Lin YC, Oliveira GH, Villa-Forte A. Churg-Strauss syndrome and persistent heart failure: active disease or damage?. J Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Oct. 19(7):390-2; discussion 419. [View Abstract]
  30. Tatsukawa H, Nagano S, Umeno Y, Oribe M. Churg-strauss syndrome with cholecystitis and renal involvement. Intern Med. 2003 Sep. 42(9):893-6. [View Abstract]
  31. Lane SE, Watts R, Scott DG. Epidemiology of systemic vasculitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Aug. 7(4):270-5. [View Abstract]
  32. Booth AD, Almond MK, Burns A, et al. Outcome of ANCA-associated renal vasculitis: a 5-year retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Apr. 41(4):776-84. [View Abstract]
  33. Kawakami T, Soma Y, Kawasaki K, Kawase A, Mizoguchi M. Initial cutaneous manifestations consistent with mononeuropathy multiplex in Churg-Strauss syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 2005 Jul. 141(7):873-8. [View Abstract]
  34. Eyler AE, Ahmad FA, Jahangir E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiac manifestations of Churg-Strauss. JRSM Open. 2014 Apr. 5(4):2054270414525370. [View Abstract]
  35. Abril A, Calamia KT, Cohen MD. The Churg Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatous angiitis): review and update. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct. 33(2):106-14. [View Abstract]
  36. Azzopardi C, Montefort S, Mallia C. Cardiac involvement and left ventricular failure in a patient with the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999. 455:547-9. [View Abstract]
  37. Barry C, Davis S, Garrard P, Ferguson IT. Churg-Strauss disease: deterioration in a twin pregnancy. Successful outcome following treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jun. 104(6):746-7. [View Abstract]
  38. Berger JR, Wei T, Wilson D. Idiopathic granulomatous angiitis of the CNS manifesting as diffuse white matter disease. Neurology. 1998 Dec. 51(6):1774-5. [View Abstract]
  39. Bili A, Condemi JJ, Bottone SM, Ryan CK. Seven cases of complete and incomplete forms of Churg-Strauss syndrome not related to leukotriene receptor antagonists. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Nov. 104(5):1060-5. [View Abstract]
  40. Boggi U, Mosca M, Giulianotti PC, Naccarato AG, Bombardieri S, Mosca F. Surviving catastrophic gastrointestinal involvement due to Churg-Strauss syndrome: report of a case. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Jul-Aug. 44(16):1169-71. [View Abstract]
  41. Brooklyn TN, Prouse P, Portmann B, Ramage JK. Churg-Strauss syndrome and granulomatous cholangiopathy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Jul. 12(7):809-11. [View Abstract]
  42. Bruce IN, Bell AL. A comparison of two nomenclature systems for primary systemic vasculitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr. 36(4):453-8. [View Abstract]
  43. Burke AP, Sobin LH, Virmani R. Localized vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995 Mar. 19(3):338-49. [View Abstract]
  44. Caballero J, Zayas R, Arana R, Cano L, Berruezo A, Pinero C. [Churg-Strauss syndrome with pericardial and myocardial involvement]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1999 Sep. 52(9):745-7. [View Abstract]
  45. Chen KR, Su WP, Pittelkow MR, Leiferman KM. Eosinophilic vasculitis syndrome: recurrent cutaneous eosinophilic necrotizing vasculitis. Semin Dermatol. 1995 Jun. 14(2):106-10. [View Abstract]
  46. Cho KH, Kim YG, Yang SG, Lee DY, Chung JH. Inflammatory nodules of the lower legs: a clinical and histological analysis of 134 cases in Korea. J Dermatol. 1997 Aug. 24(8):522-9. [View Abstract]
  47. Davis MD, Daoud MS, McEvoy MT, Su WP. Cutaneous manifestations of Churg-Strauss syndrome: a clinicopathologic correlation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Aug. 37(2 Pt 1):199-203. [View Abstract]
  48. Dietz A, Hubner C, Andrassy K. [Macrolide antibiotic-induced vasculitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome)]. Laryngorhinootologie. 1998 Feb. 77(2):111-4. [View Abstract]
  49. Dillon MJ. Childhood vasculitis. Lupus. 1998. 7(4):259-65. [View Abstract]
  50. Dinç A, Soy M, Pay S, Simsek I, Erdem H, Sobaci G. A case of Churg-Strauss syndrome presenting with cortical blindness. Clin Rheumatol. 2000. 19(4):318-20. [View Abstract]
  51. Eustace JA, Nadasdy T, Choi M. Disease of the month. The Churg Strauss Syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Sep. 10(9):2048-55. [View Abstract]
  52. Falk RJ, Nachman PH, Hogan SL, Jennette JC. ANCA glomerulonephritis and vasculitis: a Chapel Hill perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2000 May. 20(3):233-43. [View Abstract]
  53. Ferro JM. Vasculitis of the central nervous system. J Neurol. 1998 Dec. 245(12):766-76. [View Abstract]
  54. Gross WL, Csernok E. Immunodiagnostic and pathophysiologic aspects of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1995 Jan. 7(1):11-9. [View Abstract]
  55. Guillevin L, Fain O, Lhote F, et al. Lack of superiority of steroids plus plasma exchange to steroids alone in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and Churg-Strauss syndrome. A prospective, randomized trial in 78 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Feb. 35(2):208-15. [View Abstract]
  56. Hagen EC, Andrassy K, Csernok E, et al. Development and standardization of solid phase assays for the detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). A report on the second phase of an international cooperative study on the standardization of ANCA assays. J Immunol Methods. 1996 Sep 13. 196(1):1-15. [View Abstract]
  57. Hauschild S, Csernok E, Schmitt WH, Gross WL. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic polyarteritis nodosa with and without hepatitis B virus infection and Churg-Strauss syndrome--62 patients. J Rheumatol. 1994 Jun. 21(6):1173-4. [View Abstract]
  58. Hellemans S, Dens J, Knockaert D. Coronary involvement in the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Heart. 1997 Jun. 77(6):576-8. [View Abstract]
  59. Hellmich B, Csernok E, Gross WL. Proinflammatory cytokines and autoimmunity in Churg-Strauss syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun. 1051:121-31. [View Abstract]
  60. Hellmich B, Ehlers S, Csernok E, Gross WL. Update on the pathogenesis of Churg-Strauss syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003 Nov-Dec. 21(6 Suppl 32):S69-77. [View Abstract]
  61. Hellmich B, Gross WL. Recent progress in the pharmacotherapy of Churg-Strauss syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Jan. 5(1):25-35. [View Abstract]
  62. Hoffman PM, Godfrey T, Stawell RJ. A case of Churg-Strauss syndrome with visual loss following central retinal artery occlusion. Lupus. 2005. 14(2):174-5. [View Abstract]
  63. Jennette JC, Wilkman AS, Falk RJ. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. Am J Pathol. 1989 Nov. 135(5):921-30. [View Abstract]
  64. Kim Y, Lee KS, Choi DC, Primack SL, Im JG. The spectrum of eosinophilic lung disease: radiologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Nov-Dec. 21(6):920-30. [View Abstract]
  65. Klemmer PJ, Chalermskulrat W, Reif MS, Hogan SL, Henke DC, Falk RJ. Plasmapheresis therapy for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in patients with small-vessel vasculitis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Dec. 42(6):1149-53. [View Abstract]
  66. Lamprecht P. Off balance: T-cells in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005 Aug. 141(2):201-10. [View Abstract]
  67. Lamprecht P. TNF-alpha inhibitors in systemic vasculitides and connective tissue diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2005 Jan. 4(1):28-34. [View Abstract]
  68. Langford CA, Sneller MC. New developments in the treatment of Wegener's granulomatosis, polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997 Jan. 9(1):26-30. [View Abstract]
  69. Lhote F, Cohen P, Genereau T, Gayraud M, Guillevin L. Microscopic polyangiitis: clinical aspects and treatment. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1996. 147(3):165-77. [View Abstract]
  70. Lie JT. Histopathologic specificity of systemic vasculitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1995 Nov. 21(4):883-909. [View Abstract]
  71. Marmursztejn J, Guillevin L, Trebossen R, Cohen P, Guilpain P, Pagnoux C, et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome cardiac involvement evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography: a prospective study on 20 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug 29. [View Abstract]
  72. Martin-Suarez I, D'Cruz D, Mansoor M, Fernandes AP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Immunosuppressive treatment in severe connective tissue diseases: effects of low dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Aug. 56(8):481-7. [View Abstract]
  73. Matsuo K, Tomioka T, Tajima Y, et al. Allergic granulomatous angitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome) with multiple intestinal fistulas. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Oct. 92(10):1937-8. [View Abstract]
  74. Metzler C, Lamprecht P, Hellmich B, Reuter M, Arlt AC, Gross WL. Leucoencephalopathy after treatment of Churg-Strauss syndrome with interferon {alpha}. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Aug. 64(8):1242-3. [View Abstract]
  75. Moosig F, Bremer JP, Hellmich B, Holle JU, Holl-Ulrich K, Laudien M, et al. A vasculitis centre based management strategy leads to improved outcome in eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss, EGPA): monocentric experiences in 150 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug 11. [View Abstract]
  76. Muschen M, Warskulat U, Perniok A, et al. Involvement of soluble CD95 in Churg-Strauss syndrome. Am J Pathol. 1999 Sep. 155(3):915-25. [View Abstract]
  77. Niles JL. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in the classification of vasculitis. Annu Rev Med. 1996. 47:303-13. [View Abstract]
  78. Pellissier JF, Figarella-Branger D, Serratrice G. [Neuromuscular diseases with eosinophilia]. Med Trop (Mars). 1998. 58(4 Suppl):471-6. [View Abstract]
  79. Primack SL, Müller NL. Radiologic manifestations of the systemic autoimmune diseases. Clin Chest Med. 1998 Dec. 19(4):573-86, vii. [View Abstract]
  80. Reid AJC, Harrison RA, Watkin SW, McCann BG, and Scott DGI. Churg-Strauss syndrome in a district hospital. Q J Med. 1998. 91:219-229.
  81. Rutgers A, Heeringa P, Tervaert JW. The role of myeloperoxidase in the pathogenesis of systemic vasculitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003 Nov-Dec. 21(6 Suppl 32):S55-63.
  82. Sable-Fourtassou R, Cohen P, Mahr A, et al. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 1. 143(9):632-8. [View Abstract]
  83. Sakamoto S, Ohba S, Eguchi K, et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured dissecting aneurysm of the intracranial vertebral artery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005 Aug. 107(5):428-31. [View Abstract]
  84. Sanders JS, Stegeman CA, Kallenberg CG. The Th1 and Th2 paradigm in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2003. 26(4):215-20. [View Abstract]
  85. Sharma BK, Daga MK, Sharma M. A limited form of Churg-Strauss syndrome presenting without asthma and eosinophilia. Med J Aust. 2004 Nov 1. 181(9):498-9. [View Abstract]
  86. Somogyi A, Muzes G, Molnar J, Tulassay Z. Drug-related Churg-Strauss syndrome?. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev. 1998 Jun-Sep. 17(2-3):63-74. [View Abstract]
  87. Sonneville R, Lagrange M, Guidoux C, et al. [The association of cardiac involvement and ischemic stroke in Churg Strauss syndrome]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2006 Feb. 162(2):229-32. [View Abstract]
  88. Steinfeld S, Golstein M, De Vuyst P. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) as a presenting feature of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). Eur Respir J. 1994 Nov. 7(11):2098. [View Abstract]
  89. Sudo K, Tashiro K. Idiopathic granulomatous angiitis of the CNS manifesting as diffuse white matter disease. Neurology. 1998 Dec. 51(6):1774; author reply 1775. [View Abstract]
  90. Sullivan EJ, Hoffman GS. Pulmonary vasculitis. Clin Chest Med. 1998 Dec. 19(4):759-76, ix. [View Abstract]
  91. Tatsis E, Schnabel A, Gross WL. Interferon-alpha treatment of four patients with the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1. 129(5):370-4. [View Abstract]
  92. Terasaki F, Hayashi T, Hirota Y, et al. Evolution to dilated cardiomyopathy from acute eosinophilic pancarditis in Churg-Strauss syndrome. Heart Vessels. 1997. 12(1):43-8. [View Abstract]
  93. Thuy GN, Cuguilliere A, Arteaga C, Miltgen J, Bonnet D. [Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia]. Med Trop (Mars). 1998. 58(4 Suppl):455-8. [View Abstract]
  94. Vital C, Vital A, Canron MH, et al. Combined nerve and muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy. A 16-year retrospective study of 202 cases. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2006 Mar. 11(1):20-9. [View Abstract]
  95. Watts RA, Lane SE, Bentham G, Scott DG. Epidemiology of systemic vasculitis: a ten-year study in the United Kingdom. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Feb. 43(2):414-9. [View Abstract]
  96. Weissler JC. Syndromes of severe asthma. Am J Med Sci. 2000 Mar. 319(3):166-76. [View Abstract]
  97. Wolf M, Rose H, Smith RN. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 28-2005. A 42-year-old man with weight loss, weakness, and a rash. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 15. 353(11):1148-57. [View Abstract]
  98. Yoshihara K, Arimura Y, Kobayashi O, et al. [Clinical study on five myeloperoxidase specific anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA) positive Churg-Strauss syndrome cases]. Ryumachi. 1998 Oct. 38(5):696-704. [View Abstract]
  99. Zhao MH, Short AK, Lockwood CM. Antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies and vasculitis. Curr Opin Hematol. 1995 Jan. 2(1):96-102. [View Abstract]