Toxic Shock Syndrome

Back

Background

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a toxin-mediated acute life-threatening illness, usually precipitated by infection with either Staphylococcus aureus or group A Streptococcus (GAS), also called Streptococcus pyogenes. It is characterized by high fever, rash, hypotension, multiorgan failure (involving at least 3 or more organ systems), and desquamation, typically of the palms and soles, 1-2 weeks after the onset of acute illness. The clinical syndrome can also include severe myalgia, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and nonfocal neurologic abnormalities.

See the image below.



View Image

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteris....

TSS was first described in children in 1978.[1] Subsequent reports identified an association with tampon use by menstruating women.[2, 3, 4] Menstrual TSS is more likely in women using highly absorbent tampons, using tampons for more days of their cycle, and keeping a single tampon in place for a longer period of time. Over the past two decades, the number of cases of menstrual TSS (1 case per 100,000) has steadily declined; this is thought to be due to the withdrawal of highly absorbent tampons from the market.

Notably, 50% of cases of TSS are not associated with menstruation. Nonmenstrual cases of TSS usually complicate the use of barrier contraceptives, surgical and postpartum wound infections, burns, cutaneous lesions, osteomyelitis, and arthritis. Although most cases of TSS occur in women, about 25% of nonmenstrual cases occur in men.

In the 1980s, Cone initially reported and Stevens subsequently characterized GAS as a pathogen responsible for invasive soft tissue infection ushered by toxic shock–like syndrome.[5, 6] The streptococcal TSS is identical to staphylococcal TSS (STSS), except that the blood cultures usually are positive for staphylococci in STSS. Toxin-producing strains of S aureus infect or colonize people who have risk factors for the development of the syndrome. Most cases are related to the staphylococcal toxin, now called TSS toxin-1 (TSST-1).

GAS is an aerobic gram-positive organism that forms chains and is an important cause of soft tissue infections. Diabetes, alcoholism, varicella infections, and surgical procedures all increase the risk of severe GAS infections and hence may potentially increase the risk of GAS TSS. Severe, invasive GAS infections can cause necrotizing fasciitis and spontaneous gangrenous myositis. An increasing number of severe GAS infections associated with shock and organ failure have been reported. These infections are termed streptococcal TSS.[7] See the image below.



View Image

Description of M proteins and streptococcal toxins.

Pathophysiology

Bacteriology

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is caused from intoxication by one of several related Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins. The most commonly implicated toxins include TSS toxin type-1 (TSST-1) and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B.

Almost all cases of menstrual TSS and half of all the nonmenstrual cases are caused by TSST-1. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B is the second leading cause of TSS. Other exotoxins such as enterotoxins A, C, D, E, and H contribute to a small number of cases. Seventy to 80% of individuals develop antibody to TSST-1 by adolescence, and 90-95% have such antibody by adulthood. Apart from host immunity status, host-pathogen interaction, local factors (pH, glucose level, magnesium level), and age all have a direct impact on the clinical expression of this toxin-mediated illness.

M protein is an important virulent determinant of GAS; strains lacking M protein are less virulent. M protein is a filamentous protein anchored to the cell membrane, which has antiphagocyte properties. M types 1, 3, 12, and 28 are the most common isolates found in patients with shock and multiorgan failure; furthermore, 3 distinct streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins (ie, A, B, C) also have been identified. These toxins induce cytotoxicity and pyrogenicity and enhance the lethal effects of endotoxins. Recently, the streptococcal super antigen, a pyrogenic exotoxin, has been isolated from an M-3 strain. In some studies, strains producing exotoxins B and C have been implicated in this syndrome, to a lesser extent.

Mechanism of shock and tissue destruction

Colonization or infection with certain strains of S aureus and GAS is followed by the production of 1 or more toxins. These toxins are absorbed systemically and produce the systemic manifestations of TSS in people who lack a protective antitoxin antibody. Possible mediators of the effects of the toxins are cytokines, such as interleukin 1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Pyrogenic exotoxins induce human mononuclear cells to synthesize TNF-alpha, IL-1-beta, and interleukin 6 (IL-6).

TSS likely relates to the ability of pyrogenic exotoxins of GAS and enterotoxins of S aureus to act as super antigens. Superantigens are molecules that interact with the T-cell receptor in a domain outside of the antigen recognition site and hence are able to activate large numbers of T cells resulting in massive cytokine production. Normally, an antigen has to be taken up, processed by an antigen-presenting cell and expressed at the cell-surface along with class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC). By contrast, superantigens do not require processing by antigen-presenting cells but instead interact directly with the class II MHC molecule. The superantigen-MHC complex then interacts with the T-cell receptor and stimulates large numbers of T cells to cause an exaggerated, dysregulated cytokine response.

In the case of TSS, the implicated exotoxins and several staphylococcal toxins (eg, TSST-1) can stimulate T-cell responses through their ability to bind to both the class II major histocompatibility complex of antigen-presenting cells and T-cell receptors. These toxins simultaneously bind to the beta chain variable region (V-beta) elements on T-cell receptors and the class II major histocompatability antigen-processing cells. This mechanism bypasses the classical antigen-processing procedures and results in excessive T-cell proliferation.

The conventional antigens activate only about 0.01-0.1% of the T-cell population, whereas, the superantigens set in motion 5-30% of the entire T-cell population. The net effect is massive production of cytokines that are capable of mediating shock and tissue injury. As part of this T cell response, interferon–gamma is also produced, which subsequently inhibits polyclonal immunoglobulin production. This failure to develop antibodies may explain why some patients are predisposed to relapse after a first episode of TSS.

Etiology

Acquisition of infection

Risk factors for the development of STSS are tampon use, vaginal colonization with toxin-producing S aureus, and lack of serum antibody to the staphylococcal toxin.[13] STSS also has occurred following use of nasal tampons for procedures of the ears, nose, and throat.

The portal of entry for streptococci is unknown in almost one half of the cases. Procedures such as suction lipectomy, hysterectomy, vaginal delivery, and bone pinning have been identified as the portal of entry in many cases. Most commonly, infection begins at a site of minor local trauma, which may be nonpenetrating. Viral infections, such as varicella and influenza, also have provided a portal of entry.

Epidemiology

US frequency

Estimates from population-based studies have documented an incidence of invasive GAS infection of 1.5-5.2 cases per 100,000 people annually.[8] Approximately 8-14% of these patients also will develop TSS.[9] A history of recent varicella infection markedly increases the risk of infection with GAS to 62.7 cases per 100,000 people per year. Severe soft tissue infections, including necrotizing fasciitis, myositis, or cellulitis, were present in approximately half of the patients.

STSS is much more common, although data on prevalence do not exist. In the United States, from 1979-1996, 5296 cases of STSS were reported. The number of cases of menstrual STSS is estimated at 1 per 100,000. The incidence of nonmenstrual STSS now exceeds menstrual STSS after the hyperabsorbable tampons were removed from the market.

Race

TSS has occurred in all races, although most cases have been reported from North America and Europe.

Sex

STSS most commonly occurs in women, usually those who are using tampons.

Age

Some studies have shown no predilection for any particular age for either the streptococcal TSS or STSS. However, other studies have reported STSS to be more common in older individuals with underlying medical problems. In a Canadian survey, STSS accounted for 6% of cases in individuals younger than 10 years compared with 21% in people older than 60 years.[8] Furthermore, menstruation-associated STSS occurred in younger women who were using tampons.

Prognosis

Mortality rates for streptococcal TSS are 30-70%.[10, 11] Morbidity also is high; in one series, 13 of 20 patients underwent major surgical procedures, such as fasciotomy, surgical debridement, laparotomy, amputation, or hysterectomy.[6, 10]

The case fatality rates for menstrual-related STSS have declined from 5.5% in 1980 to 1.8% in 1996.

Patient Education

Patient education about early signs and symptoms, risk factors and avoidance of tampon use may help prevent relapses. For patient education resources, visit the Women's Health Center. Also, see the patient education article Toxic Shock Syndrome.

History

Although the clinical manifestations of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) can be diverse, the possibility of toxic shock should be considered in any individual who presents with sudden onset of fever, rash, hypotension, renal or respiratory failure, and changes in mental status.[12]

Staphylococcal TSS (STSS) most commonly occurs in women, usually those who are using tampons, TSS develops within 5 days after the onset of menstruation. The other clinical settings where STSS has been reported include the following:

Soft tissue infections from group A Streptococcus (GAS) include necrotizing fasciitis, myositis, or cellulitis. The most common initial symptom of patients with streptococcal TSS is diffuse or localized pain that is abrupt and severe. Other manifestations include the following:

Approximately 20% of patients with STSS have an influenzalike syndrome characterized by the following:

The other reported types of infection are pneumonia, unidentified bacteremia, surgical site infection, septic arthritis, thrombophlebitis, meningitis, pelvic infection, and endophthalmitis.

Common presenting symptoms and frequency of STTS are as follows[10] :

The following risk factors have been reported to be associated with STSS:

Physical Examination

Fever is the most common presenting sign, although patients in shock may present with hypothermia. Shock is apparent at the time of hospitalization or within 4-8 hours for all patients. Patients become severely hypotensive and do not respond to intravenous fluid administration. Renal dysfunction progresses or persists in all patients, precedes shock in many patients, and is apparent early. Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurs in 55% of patients and requires mechanical ventilation.

A thorough search for possible sites of streptococcal and staphylococcal infection is a must. The surgical wounds should be carefully examined even if no signs of infection are apparent. Vaginal examination and removal of tampon or other foreign body should be done diligently.

Confusion is present in 55% of patients, and coma or agitation may occur. Alteration in mental status disproportionate to the degree of hypotension can occur with or without seizures. Persistent neuropsychiatric sequelae manifested by memory loss, and poor concentration have been reported.

Nearly 50% of patients are normotensive on presentation but become hypotensive within 4 hours.

Approximately 80% of patients have clinical signs of soft tissue infection (eg, localized swelling, erythema), which usually progresses to necrotizing fasciitis or myositis.

Approximately 20% of patients have various clinical presentations, including the following:

Diffuse scarlatinalike erythema occurs in 10% of patients. Skin manifestations of streptococcal infection include the following (also see images below):

Mucosal involvement includes conjunctival/scleral hemorrhage and hyperemia of the vaginal and oropharyngeal mucosa. Petechial hemorrhages (“strawberry tongue”) and ulcerations of mucosal membranes can occur in severe cases. The possibility of STSS should be entertained in any patient who presents with a sudden onset of fever, rash, hypotension, and systemic evidence of toxicity. Five categories of clinical features are needed for the diagnosis (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1990).

The five categories are (1) fever; (2) rash (diffuse macular erythroderma); (3) desquamation (1-2 wk after illness onset, involving palms and soles); (4) hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, orthostatic drop in diastolic blood pressure < 15 mm Hg, orthostatic syncope, and dizziness); and (5) evidence of multisystem involvement in 3 or more of the following systems:

Common presenting symptoms and frequency of STTS are as follows[6] :

The case definition of streptococcal TSS involves the isolation of GAS, hypotension, and multisystem involvement.[14]

The presence of hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mm Hg in adults or less than fifth percentile for children) is required, along with either (1) the isolation of GAS (S pyogenes) from a normally sterile site (eg, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid) for a definite case or (2) the isolation of GAS (S pyogenes) from a nonsterile site for a probable case.

Additionally, multiorgan involvement, as evidenced by at least 2 of the following, is required for either definite or probable cases:

Complications

Severe complications from STTS include the following[6] :

STSS carries a mortality rate of 3%, and streptococcal TSS has a mortality rate of 30%.

TSS may recur in patients who are not treated with beta-lactamase–resistant antimicrobial drugs.

Some patients with streptococcal TSS have respiratory symptoms and develop lobar consolidation and empyema. This condition may need to be distinguished from overwhelming Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis.

Laboratory Studies

CBC count with differential should be performed to determine the following:

Urinalysis should be performed to determine the following:

Prolonged prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times should be performed.

Serum biochemistry should be performed to determine the following:

Blood cultures should be performed to determine the following:

Gram stain and cultures should be performed to determine the following:

Common laboratory abnormalities in patients with streptococcal TSS include the following[10] :

The case definition of streptococcal  toxic shock syndrome (TSS) involves (1) the isolation of group A Streptococcus (GAS) from either a sterile body site or a nonsterile body site and (2) a determination the clinical severity based on whether hypotension is present and the presence/absence of the following clinical and laboratory abnormalities:

A definite case of TSS is defined as isolation of GAS from a sterile site and hypotension plus two or more of the clinical and laboratory abnormalities.

A probable case of TSS is defined as isolation of GAS from a nonsterile body site and hypotension plus two or more of the clinical and laboratory abnormalities.

Imaging Studies

With regard to chest radiography, patients who develop multiorgan dysfunction have bilateral airspace infiltrates consistent with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Medical Care

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) has a rapid, dramatic, and fulminant onset. Quick recognition of the syndrome is important for enabling appropriate and prompt treatment. S pyogenes continues to be susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics. Although very effective in treating pharyngitis and other superficial infections, aggressive group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections do not respond well to penicillin and continue to be associated with high mortality rates and extensive morbidity.

The principles in the management of septic shock in general must be instituted as soon as possible (see Septic Shock). These include the following components:

In experimental models of S pyogenes infection, penicillin proved to be inferior to clindamycin. The physiologic state of the organism attributed to the inoculum effects is suggested as the mechanism of failure.

Penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics are most efficacious against rapidly growing bacteria; therefore, these antibiotics have the greatest efficacy when organisms are growing rapidly during the early stages of infection or in mild infections. When higher concentrations of GAS accumulate (eg, deep-seeded infections), the effectiveness of beta-lactam antibiotics decreases because the bacterial growth slows (stationary phase).

Penicillin mediates its antibacterial action against GAS by interacting with penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Experimentally, the binding of penicillin has been shown to decrease in stationary cells, related to cells in the logarithmic growth phase; thus, the loss of certain PBPs during the stationary growth phase may be secondary to the inoculum effect and may account for penicillin failure.

Clindamycin has multiple effects against GAS infection. The efficacy of clindamycin is not affected by inoculum size or growth stage; furthermore, this agent is a potent suppressor of bacterial toxin synthesis. Clindamycin facilitates phagocytosis of S pyogenes by inhibiting M protein synthesis. Clindamycin suppresses synthesis of PBPs, which also are enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis. Clindamycin has a longer postantibiotic effect than penicillin. Clindamycin causes suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced monocyte synthesis of TNF.[15]

Dixit et al reported successful treatment of a case of recurrent menstrual TSS after tampons were discontinued with rifampicin and clindamycin.[16]

The FDA approved three newer antibiotics, oritavancin (Orbactiv), dalbavancin (Dalvance), and tedizolid (Sivextro), for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. These agents are active against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S aureus [MSSA, MRSA] isolates), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus anginosus group (includes Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus constellatus), among others. For complete drug information, including dosing, see the following monographs:

Most patients who develop TSS are critically ill and should be transferred to an intensive care unit of an institution capable of caring for these patients.

Recommended antibiotic therapy

For patients with GAS infection, the administration of clindamycin (600-900 mg IV q8h) is recommended. Other clinicians recommend combined therapy, in which penicillin G (4 million U IV q4h) is combined with clindamycin.

Because differentiating between STSS and streptococcal TSS on clinical grounds alone is difficult, intravenous penicillin also should be administered in addition to a beta-lactamase resistant antibiotic until a bacteriologic diagnosis is confirmed by culture. Alternatively, a first-generation cephalosporin or vancomycin can be used.

Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome

Large doses of a beta-lactamase–resistant, antistaphylococcal, antimicrobial agent should be administered intravenously to patients with staphylococcal infections. The usually prescribed antibiotics are nafcillin, oxacillin, and first generation cephalosporin. Nafcillin or oxacillin (2 g q4h) is generally recommended. Vancomycin can be used in penicillin-allergic patients.

These agents have been known to increase TSST-1 in culture possibly by cell lysis. Therefore, clindamycin may be used in combination for the first few days to reduce synthesis of TSST-1.

The antibiotic treatment is continued for 10-14 days in absence of a complication.

Intravenous fluids

TSS causes intractable hypotension and diffuse capillary leak; therefore, massive amounts of intravenous fluids (10-15 L/d) often are necessary. Patients in shock may require central venous monitoring or right heart catheterization to guide fluid management.

The patient's blood pressure may improve with administration of fluids alone; otherwise, mild vasopressors (eg, dopamine) or even more potent vasoconstrictors (eg, norepinephrine) are required. Norepinephrine with or without dobutamine may be more effective than high-dose dopamine or epinephrine to preserve splanchnic perfusion.

Patients with TSS will require supportive measures, including intubation and mechanical ventilation, dialysis in patients who have developed renal failure, and adequate nutritional support.

Other treatment measures

Intravenous immunoglobulin

Several anecdotal reports, one large series of 21 patients and a case control study, reported lower mortality rates for patients with streptococcal TSS (STSS) treated with intravenous immunoglobulins.[11, 17, 18] Intravenous immunoglobulins also have been reported to be beneficial in severe cases of Staphylococcal TSS. A single dose of IVIG (400 mg/kg), generates protective levels of antibody to TSST-1 that persist for week. The recommended initial dosage is 2 g/kg, followed by 0.4 g/kg for as long as 5 days.

The mechanism responsible for the efficacy of gamma-globulin therapy may be neutralization of the circulating toxins, inhabitation of TNF-alpha production via nonspecific inhabitation of monocyte or T-cell activation, or inhibition of other streptococcal virulence factors. The contraindications include a history of anaphylaxis from immune globulin in past, immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency, and circulating anti-IgA antibodies.[19]

One case series described seven patients with severe soft tissue infection caused by GAS and TSS. All were treated with effective antimicrobials and high-dose intravenous immune serum globulin (IVIG). Surgery was either not performed or only limited exploration was carried out. Six of the patients had toxic shock syndrome. The study suggests that the use of a medical regimen including IVIG in patients with severe GAS soft tissue infections may allow a minimally invasive approach. This can limit the need to perform immediate wide debridements and amputations in unstable patients.[20]

Another prospective, randomized, controlled study included patients with severe sepsis and septic shock of intra-abdominal origin admitted to the ICU. Polyvalent IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (Ig) (Pentaglobin; IVIG group) at a dosage of 7 mL/kg/day for 5 days or an equal amount of 5% human albumin (control group) was randomized. Fifty-six patients were enrolled. The overall mortality rate was 37.5%. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mortality rate was reduced from 48.1% in patients treated with antibiotic plus albumin to 27.5% for patients with antibiotic plus IVIG. IVIG administration in combination with adequate antibiotics improved the survival of surgical ICU patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.[21]

Others

Hyperbaric oxygen has been used anecdotally in few patients, but whether this treatment is useful is not clear.

High-dose corticosteroid therapy has not been shown to be beneficial; stress-dose steroids (hydrocortisone 50 mg IV every 6 hours) should be considered in patients with refractory shock despite adequate antimicrobial theory and source control.

In recent years, research is continuing to develop either monoclonal antibodies against TSST-1 or other peptides to block the ability of bacterial toxins to activate T cells, therefore blocking the toxicity cascade.[22] Most of this research presently is focused on in vitro and animal models of toxic shock.

Surgical Care

Prompt, aggressive exploration and debridement of patients thought to have deep-seeded pyogenic infection constitutes a surgical emergency. Surgical exploration through a small incision with visualization of the muscle and fascia may provide an early and definitive diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. Infection often is more extensive than is apparent from external examination. Surgical debridement of infected tissue is extremely important and often requires re-exploration to ensure adequacy of resection.

See the images below.



View Image

Extensive debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.



View Image

The hand is healing following aggressive surgical debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.

Consultations

Consultation with a surgeon should occur early.

A consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is mandatory, and a consultation with an intensivist also is required for management of these patients in an intensive care unit.

Prevention

Patients who recover from TSS are at risk of recurrent episodes of STSS. Consider or recommend preventive therapy (eg, discontinuation of tampon usage, administration of antistaphylococcal antibiotics) before and during each menstrual period for several months.

Chemoprophylaxis of household contacts of STSS patients: Household contacts of people with STSS have a higher risk of invasive GAS infection compared to the general population. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have not made definite recommendations; some authors have recommended a 10-day course of cephalosporin.

Guideline Summary

The Infectious Diseases Society of America updated their guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections. For the full guidelines, see Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.[23, 24]

Additional guides from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Committee have also been updated. See Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.[25]

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity, prevent complications, and eradicate the infection. The FDA approved three newer antibiotics, oritavancin (Orbactiv), dalbavancin (Dalvance), and tedizolid (Sivextro), for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. These agents are active against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S aureus [MSSA, MRSA] isolates), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus anginosus group (includes Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus constellatus), among others. For complete drug information, including dosing, see the following monographs:

Clindamycin (Cleocin)

Clinical Context:  Clindamycin is a lincosamide indicated for serious skin and soft tissue staphylococcal infections. It is also effective against aerobic and anaerobic streptococci (except enterococci). As much as 20% of group B streptococci may be resistant. Clindamycin inhibits bacterial growth, possibly by blocking dissociation of peptidyl tRNA from ribosomes, causing RNA-dependent protein synthesis to arrest.

Aqueous penicillin G (Pfizerpen)

Clinical Context:  Aqueous penicillin G interferes with the synthesis of cell wall mucopeptide during active multiplication, resulting in bactericidal activity against susceptible microorganisms.

Nafcillin (Nalipen in dextrose)

Clinical Context:  Nafcillin is initial therapy for suspected penicillin G–resistant staphylococcal infections. Use parenteral therapy initially in severe infections. Owing to thrombophlebitis, particularly in elderly patients, administer parenterally only for the short term (1-2 d); change to oral route as clinically indicated.

Vancomycin

Clinical Context:  Vancomycin is a potent antibiotic directed against gram-positive organisms and active against Enterococcus species. Vancomycin is useful in the treatment of patients with septicemia and skin structure infections. It is indicated for patients who cannot receive or have failed to respond to penicillins and cephalosporins or who have infections with resistant staphylococci (eg, MRSA). For abdominal penetrating injuries, combine with an agent active against enteric flora and/or anaerobes.

Use creatinine clearance to adjust dose in patients with renal impairment.

Oxacillin (Bactocill in Dextrose)

Clinical Context:  Oxacillin is a bactericidal antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis. It is used in the treatment of infections caused by penicillinase-producing staphylococci. Oxacillin may be used to initiate therapy when staphylococcal infection is suspected.

Tedizolid (Sivextro)

Clinical Context:  Tedizolid is an oxazolidione antibiotic; its action is mediated by binding to the 50S subunit of the bacterial ribosome, resulting in inhibition of protein synthesis.

Oritavancin (Orbactiv)

Clinical Context:  Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that exerts concentration-dependent bactericidal activity.

Dalbavancin (Dalvance)

Clinical Context:  Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic; it interferes with cell wall synthesis by binding to D-alanyl-D-alanine terminus of the stem pentapeptide in nascent cell wall peptidoglycan, thus preventing cross-linking.

Dalbavancin is bactericidal in vitro against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes at concentrations observed in humans at recommended doses.

Class Summary

Antimicrobial therapy must cover all likely pathogens in the context of the clinical setting.

What is toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What causes toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the pathophysiology of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the mechanism of shock and tissue destruction in the pathophysiology of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the risk factors for the development of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the prevalence of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) in the US?What are the racial predilections of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?How does the prevalence of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) vary by sex?Which age groups have the highest prevalence of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the prognosis of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What should be included in patient education about toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the clinical presentations of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which conditions are associated with toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the signs and symptoms of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the symptoms of influenza-like syndrome in patients with toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What types of infections have been reported in patients with in toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the most common presenting symptoms of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which patient groups are at higher risk for toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which physical findings are characteristic of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are cutaneous and mucosal signs and symptoms of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the diagnostic criteria toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the most common presenting symptoms of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which multiorgan involvement is required for diagnosis of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are severe complications from toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the differential diagnoses for Toxic Shock Syndrome?What is the role of complete blood count (CBC) test in the workup of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of urinalysis in the workup of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of serum biochemistry in the workup of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of blood cultures in the workup of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of gram stain and cultures in the workup of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which lab abnormalities suggest toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?How is streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) diagnosed?What is the role of imaging studies in the evaluation of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of medications in the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What can reduce the risk of mortality from toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What are the principles in the management of septic shock, used in the treatment of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which new antibiotics are used in the treatment of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the recommended antibiotic therapy for group A Streptococcus (GAS)-related toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the recommended antibiotic therapy for staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of IV fluids for the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of IV immunoglobulins in the treatment of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of hyperbaric oxygen and high-dose corticosteroid therapy in the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of monoclonal antibodies in the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of surgery in the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which specialists should be consulted in the treatment of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?How is toxic shock syndrome (TSS) prevented?Which guidelines are available for the management of toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?What is the role of drug treatment for toxic shock syndrome (TSS)?Which medications in the drug class Antibiotics are used in the treatment of Toxic Shock Syndrome?

Author

Ramesh Venkataraman, MBBS, Consultant, Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, India

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba Faculty of Medicine; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St Boniface General Hospital, Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Richard B Brown, MD, FACP, Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baystate Medical Center; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, Dr(HC), FCCP, FAPS, MCCM, Professor of Critical Care Medicine, Bioengineering, Cardiovascular Disease, Clinical and Translational Science and Anesthesiology, Vice-Chair of Academic Affairs, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Masimo, Edwards Lifesciences, Cheetah Medical, Exostat<br/>Received honoraria from LiDCO Ltd for consulting; Received intellectual property rights from iNTELOMED for board membership; Received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences for consulting; Received honoraria from Masimo, Inc for board membership.

Additional Contributors

Cory Franklin, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science; Director, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cook County Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthors Godfrey Harding, MD, FRCP(C), and Ken Dolynchuk, MD, PhD, FRCSC, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Todd J, Fishaut M, Kapral F, Welch T. Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci. Lancet. 1978 Nov 25. 2 (8100):1116-8. [View Abstract]
  2. Shands KN, Schmid GP, Dan BB. Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: association with tampon use and Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features in 52 cases. N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 18. 303(25):1436-42. [View Abstract]
  3. Davis JP, Chesney PJ, Wand PJ. Toxic-shock syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 18. 303(25):1429-35. [View Abstract]
  4. Ellies E, Vallée F, Mari A, Silva S, Bauriaud R, Fourcade O, et al. [Toxic shock syndrome consecutive to the presence of vaginal tampon for menstruation regressive after early haemodynamic optimization and activated protein C infusion]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Jan. 28(1):91-5. [View Abstract]
  5. Cone LA, Woodard DR, Schlievert PM. Clinical and bacteriologic observations of a toxic shock-like syndrome due to Streptococcus pyogenes. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16. 317(3):146-9. [View Abstract]
  6. Stevens DL, Tanner MH, Winship J. Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a toxic shock- like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 6. 321(1):1-7. [View Abstract]
  7. Lappin E, Ferguson AJ. Gram-positive toxic shock syndromes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 May. 9(5):281-90. [View Abstract]
  8. Davies HD, McGeer A, Schwartz B. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 22. 335(8):547-54. [View Abstract]
  9. Eriksson BK, Andersson J, Holm SE. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of invasive group A streptococcal infections and the streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Dec. 27(6):1428-36. [View Abstract]
  10. Stevens DL. Invasive group A streptococcus infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jan. 14(1):2-11. [View Abstract]
  11. Demers B, Simor AE, Vellend H. Severe invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada: 1987-1991. Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun. 16(6):792-800; discussion 801-2. [View Abstract]
  12. Matsuda Y, Kato H, Ono E, Kikuchi K, Muraoka M, Takagi K, et al. Diagnosis of toxic shock syndrome by two different systems; clinical criteria and monitoring of TSST-1-reactive T cells. Microbiol Immunol. 2008 Nov. 52(11):513-21. [View Abstract]
  13. Park JS, Kim JS, Yi J, Kim EC. [Production and characterization of anti-staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 monoclonal antibody]. Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Dec. 28(6):449-56. [View Abstract]
  14. The Working Group on Severe Streptococcal Infections. Defining the group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Rationale and consensus definition. JAMA. 1993 Jan 20. 269(3):390-1. [View Abstract]
  15. Kalyan S, Chow AW. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 induces the translocation and secretion of high mobility group-1 protein from both activated T cells and monocytes. Mediators Inflamm. 2008. 2008:512196. [View Abstract]
  16. Dixit S, Fischer G, Wittekind C. Recurrent menstrual toxic shock syndrome despite discontinuation of tampon use: is menstrual toxic shock syndrome really caused by tampons?. Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Nov. 54 (4):283-6. [View Abstract]
  17. Kaul R, McGeer A, Norrby-Teglund A. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome--a comparative observational study. The Canadian Streptococcal Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Apr. 28(4):800-7. [View Abstract]
  18. Stevens DL. The flesh-eating bacterium: what's next?. J Infect Dis. 1999 Mar. 179 Suppl 2:S366-74. [View Abstract]
  19. Breshears LM, Schlievert PM, Peterson ML. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM17) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling drive the epithelial response to Staphylococcus aureus toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1). J Biol Chem. 2012 Sep 21. 287(39):32578-87. [View Abstract]
  20. Norrby-Teglund A, Muller MP, Mcgeer A. Successful management of severe group A streptococcal soft tissue infections using an aggressive medical regimen including intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin together with a conservative surgical approach. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005. 37(3):166-72. [View Abstract]
  21. Rodríguez A, Rello J, Neira J, Maskin B, Ceraso D, Vasta L. Effects of high-dose of intravenous immunoglobulin and antibiotics on survival for severe sepsis undergoing surgery. Shock. 2005 Apr. 23(4):298-304. [View Abstract]
  22. Karauzum H, Chen G, Abaandou L, et al. Synthetic human monoclonal antibodies toward staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) protective against toxic shock syndrome. J Biol Chem. 2012 Jul 20. 287(30):25203-15. [View Abstract]
  23. [Guideline] Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15. 59(2):147-59. [View Abstract]
  24. Barclay L. IDSA: skin and soft tissue infections guidelines updated. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/827399. Accessed: August 22, 2014.
  25. [Guideline] Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb. 41(2):580-637. [View Abstract]

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. The patient improved with antibiotics and intravenous gammaglobulin therapy. Several days later, a characteristic desquamation of the skin occurred over palms and soles. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

Description of M proteins and streptococcal toxins.

Progression of soft tissue swelling to vesicle or bullous formation is an ominous sign and suggests streptococcal shock syndrome. Courtesy of S. Manocha.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. This patient also had streptococcal pharyngitis. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

Extensive debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.

The hand is healing following aggressive surgical debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.

Description of M proteins and streptococcal toxins.

Group A streptococci cause beta hemolysis on blood agar.

Group A streptococci on Gram stain of blood isolated from a patient who developed toxic shock syndrome. Courtesy of T. Matthews.

This schematic shows interaction among T-cell receptor, superantigen, and class II major histocompatability complex. The binding of superantigen to class II molecules and T-cell receptors is not limited by antigen specificity and lies outside the normal antigen binding sites.

Progression of soft tissue swelling to vesicle or bullous formation is an ominous sign and suggests streptococcal shock syndrome. Courtesy of S. Manocha.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The leg was incised to exclude underlying necrotizing infection. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. This patient also had streptococcal pharyngitis. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. The patient improved with antibiotics and intravenous gammaglobulin therapy. Several days later, a characteristic desquamation of the skin occurred over palms and soles. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.

A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.

A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.

A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.

Necrotizing cellulitis of toxic shock syndrome.

Soft-tissue infection secondary to group A streptococci, leading to toxic shock syndrome.

Extensive debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.

The hand is healing following aggressive surgical debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.

Necrosis of the little toe of the right foot and cellulitis of the foot secondary to group A streptococci.