Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic disease caused by a dysregulated immune response to host intestinal microflora. The two major types of inflammatory bowel disease are ulcerative colitis (UC), which is limited to the colonic mucosa, and Crohn disease (CD), which can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus, involves "skip lesions," and is transmural. There is a genetic predisposition for IBD, and patients with this condition are more prone to the development of malignancy. See the image below.
View Image | Severe colitis noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The mucosa is grossly denuded, with active bleeding noted. The p.... |
Generally, the manifestations of IBD depend on the area of the intestinal tract involved. The symptoms, however, are not specific for this disease. They are as follows:
The World Gastroenterology Organization indicates the following symptoms may be associated with inflammatory damage of the digestive tract[1] :
See Clinical Presentation for more detail.
Examination in patients with IBD may include the following findings, which are directly related to the severity of the attack:
Testing
Although several laboratory studies may aid in the management of IBD and provide supporting information, no laboratory test is specific enough to adequately and definitively establish the diagnosis, including the following:
Imaging studies
The following imaging studies may be used to assess patients with IBD:
See Workup for more detail.
The medical approach for patients with IBD is symptomatic care (ie, relief of symptoms) and mucosal healing following a stepwise approach to medication, with escalation of the medical regimen until a response is achieved (“step-up” or “stepwise” approach), such as the following:
Pharmacotherapy
The following medications may be used in patients with IBD:
Surgery
UC is surgically curable. However, surgical resection is not curative in CD, with recurrence being the norm. Consider early consultation with a surgeon in the setting of severe colitis or bowel obstruction and in cases of suspected toxic megacolon.
Surgical intervention in IBD includes the following:
See Treatment and Medication for more detail.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic disease caused by a dysregulated immune response to host intestinal microflora. The 2 major types of IBD are ulcerative colitis (UC), which is limited to the colon, and Crohn disease (CD), which can involve any segment of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from the mouth to the anus, involves "skip lesions," and is transmural (see the images below). There is a genetic predisposition for IBD (see Etiology), and patients with this condition are more prone to the development of malignancy (see Prognosis).
View Image | Severe colitis noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The mucosa is grossly denuded, with active bleeding noted. The p.... |
View Image | Stricture in the terminal ileum noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. This image depicts a narrowed segment visible u.... |
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease share many extraintestinal manifestations, although some of these tend to occur more commonly with either condition (see the image below). Eye-skin-mouth-joint extraintestinal manifestations (eg, oral aphthae, erythema nodosum, large-joint arthritis, and episcleritis) reflect active disease, whereas pyoderma gangrenosum, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), ankylosing spondylitis, uveitis, kidney stones, and gallstones may occur in quiescent disease.[5]
Although both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease have distinct pathologic findings, approximately 10%-15% of patients cannot be classified definitively into either type; in such patients, the disease is labeled as indeterminate colitis. Systemic symptoms are common in IBD and include fever, sweats, malaise, and arthralgias.
View Image | Distinguishing features of Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). |
The rectum is always involved in ulcerative colitis, and the disease primarily involves continuous lesions of the mucosa and the submucosa. Both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease usually have waxing and waning intensity and severity. When the patient is symptomatic due to active inflammation, the disease is considered to be in an active stage (the patient is having a flare of the IBD). (See Presentation.)
In many cases, symptoms correspond well to the degree of inflammation present for either disease, although this is not universally true. In some patients, objective evidence linking active disease to ongoing inflammation should be sought before administering medications with significant adverse effects (see Medication), because patients with IBD can have other reasons for their gastrointestinal symptoms unrelated to their IBD, including coexisting irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), celiac disease, or other confounding diagnoses, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) effects and ischemic or infectious colitis.
Although ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease have significant differences, many, but not all, of the treatments available for one condition are also effective for the other. Surgical intervention for ulcerative colitis is curative for colonic disease and potential colonic malignancy, but it is not curative for Crohn disease. (See Treatment.)
The common end pathway of ulcerative colitis is inflammation of the mucosa of the intestinal tract, causing ulceration, edema, bleeding, and fluid and electrolyte loss.[6] In several studies, genetic factors appeared to influence the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by causing a disruption of epithelial barrier integrity, deficits in autophagy,[7] deficiencies in innate pattern recognition receptors, and problems with lymphocyte differentiation, especially in Crohn disease.[8]
Inflammatory mediators have been identified in IBD, and considerable evidence suggests that these mediators play an important role in the pathologic and clinical characteristics of these disorders. Cytokines, which are released by macrophages in response to various antigenic stimuli, bind to different receptors and produce autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine effects. Cytokines differentiate lymphocytes into different types of T cells. Helper T cells, type 1 (Th-1), are associated principally with Crohn disease, whereas Th-2 cells are associated principally with ulcerative colitis. The immune response disrupts the intestinal mucosa and leads to a chronic inflammatory process.[9]
In animal studies, a local irritant (eg, acetic acid, trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid) can be inserted via an enema into the colon of rats or rabbits to induce a chemical colitis. An interleukin-10 (IL-10) knockout mouse has been genetically engineered to have some characteristics similar to those of a human with IBD. The cotton-top marmoset, a South American primate, develops colitis very similar to ulcerative colitis when the animal is subjected to stress.
In ulcerative colitis, the inflammation begins in the rectum and extends proximally in an uninterrupted fashion to the proximal colon and could eventually involve the entire length of the large intestine. The rectum is always involved in ulcerative colitis; and unlike in Crohn disease, there are no "skip areas" (ie, normal areas of the bowel interspersed with diseased areas), unless pretreated with topical rectal therapy (ie, a steroid or 5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] enema).
The disease remains confined to the rectum in approximately 25% of cases, and in the remainder of cases, ulcerative colitis spreads proximally and contiguously. Pancolitis occurs in 10% of patients. The distal terminal ileum may become inflamed in a superficial manner, referred to as backwash ileitis. Even with less than total colonic involvement, the disease is strikingly and uniformly continuous. As ulcerative colitis becomes chronic, the colon becomes a rigid foreshortened tube that lacks its usual haustral markings, leading to the lead-pipe appearance observed on barium enema. (See the images below.)
View Image | Inflamed colonic mucosa demonstrating pseudopolyps in a patient with ulcerative colitis. |
View Image | Double-contrast barium enema study shows pseudopolyposis of the descending colon in a patient with ulcerative colitis. |
Crohn disease can affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus, and causes 3 patterns of involvement: inflammatory disease, strictures, and fistulas. This disease consists of segmental involvement by a nonspecific granulomatous inflammatory process. The most important pathologic feature of Crohn disease is that it is transmural, involving all layers of the bowel, not just the mucosa and the submucosa, which is characteristic of ulcerative colitis. Furthermore, Crohn disease is discontinuous, with skip areas interspersed between 2 or more involved areas.
Late in the disease, the mucosa develops a cobblestone appearance, which results from deep, longitudinal ulcerations interlaced with intervening normal mucosa (see the images below). In 35% of cases, Crohn disease occurs in the ileum and colon; in 32%, solely in the colon; in 28%, in the small bowel; and in 5%, in the gastroduodenal region.[10] Diarrhea, cramping, and abdominal pain are common symptoms of Crohn disease in all of the above locations, except for the gastroduodenal region, in which anorexia, nausea, and vomiting are more common.[10]
Rectal sparing is a typical but not constant feature of Crohn disease. However, anorectal complications (eg, fistulas, abscesses) are common. Much less commonly, Crohn disease involves the more proximal parts of the GI tract, including the mouth, tongue, esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.
View Image | Cobblestone change of the mucosa of the terminal ileum in a patient with Crohn disease. Communicating fissures and crevices in the mucosa separate isl.... |
View Image | This computed tomography scan from a patient with terminal ileal Crohn disease shows an enteroenteral fistula (arrow) between loops of diseased small .... |
View Image | Deep, fissuring ulcer in a patient with Crohn disease. Note the increase in submucosal inflammation and scattered lymphoid aggregates. |
Cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis
The incidence of gallstones and kidney stones is increased in Crohn disease because of malabsorption of fat and bile salts. Gallstones are formed because of increased cholesterol concentration in the bile, which is caused by a reduced bile salt pool.
Patients who have Crohn disease with ileal disease or ileal resection are also likely to form calcium oxalate kidney stones. With the fat malabsorption, unabsorbed long-chain fatty acids bind calcium in the lumen. Oxalate in the lumen is normally bound to calcium. Calcium oxalate is poorly soluble and poorly absorbed; however, if calcium is bound to malabsorbed fatty acids, oxalate combines with sodium to form sodium oxalate, which is soluble and is absorbed in the colon (enteric hyperoxaluria). The development of calcium oxalate stones in Crohn disease requires an intact colon to absorb oxalate. Patients with ileostomies generally do not develop calcium oxalate stones, but they may develop uric acid or mixed stones.[11]
Three characteristics define the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): (1) genetic predisposition; (2) an altered, dysregulated immune response; and (3) an altered response to gut microorganisms. However, the triggering event for the activation of the immune response in IBD has yet to be identified. Possible factors related to this event include a pathogenic organism (as yet unidentified) or an inappropriate response (ie, failure to downgrade the inflammatory response to an antigen, such as an alteration in barrier function).
No mechanism has been implicated as the primary cause, but many are postulated. The lymphocyte population in persons with IBD is polyclonal, making the search for a single precipitating cause difficult. In any case, an inappropriate activation of the immune system leads to continued inflammation of the intestinal tract, with both an acute (neutrophilic) and chronic (lymphocytic, histiocytic) inflammatory response.
Several environmental risk factors have been proposed as contributing to the IBD pathogenesis, but the results are inconsistent, and the limitations of the studies preclude drawing firm conclusions. The most consistent association described has been smoking, which increases the risk of Crohn disease. However, current smoking protects against ulcerative colitis, whereas former smoking increases the risk of ulcerative colitis. Dietary factors have also been inconsistently described. In some studies, high fiber intake and high intake of fruits and vegetables appear protective against IBD.[12] The E3N prospective study found that high animal protein intake (meat or fish) carried a higher risk of IBD.[13]
Persons with IBD have a genetic susceptibility for the disease,[14] and considerable research over the past decade has improved our understanding of the role of these genes. Note that these genes appear to be permissive (ie, allow IBD to occur), but they are not causative (ie, just because the gene is present does not necessarily mean the disease will develop).
First-degree relatives have a 5- to 20-fold increased risk of developing IBD, as compared with persons from unaffected families.[6, 8] The child of a parent with IBD has a 5% risk of developing IBD. Twin studies show a concordance of approximately 70% in identical twins, versus 5%-10% in nonidentical twins. Of patients with IBD, 10%-25% are estimated to have a first-degree relative with the disease. Monozygous twin studies show a high concordance for Crohn disease but less so for ulcerative colitis.
Crohn disease
An early discovery on chromosome 16 (IBD1 gene) led to the identification of 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (2 missense, 1 frameshift) in the NOD2 gene (now called CARD15) as the first gene (CARD15) clearly associated with IBD (as a susceptibility gene for Crohn disease). CARD15 is a polymorphic gene involved in the innate immune system. The gene has more than 60 variations, of which 3 play a role in 27% of patients with Crohn disease, primarily in patients with ileal disease.
Subsequent studies have suggested that the CARD15 genotype is associated not only with the onset of the disease but also with its natural history. A study on a German and Norwegian cohort showed that patients with 1 of the 3 identified risk alleles for CARD15 were more likely to have either ileal or right colonic disease.[15, 16] These gene products appear to be involved in the intracellular innate immune pathways that recognize microbial products in the cytoplasm.
Another early genome-wide association study looked at Jewish and non-Jewish case-control cohorts and identified 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IL23R gene, which encodes 1 subunit of the interleukin-23 receptor protein.[17] Interestingly, this study also described the promising nature of certain therapies that block the function of IL-23. Further research suggested that one particular polymorphism in the IL23R gene showed the strongest association in a German population.[18] However, another study found that the Arg381Gln substitution is associated with childhood onset of IBD in Scotland.[19] These gene products appear to be involved in regulating adaptive immunity.
Numerous other loci have been identified as conferring susceptibility to Crohn disease, including several large meta-analyses that found multiple novel susceptibility loci and confirmed earlier findings. In one meta-analysis of 3 genome-wide association scans, 526 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 74 distinct genomic loci were found.[20] In sorting out loci that have been previously discussed, there were 21 new loci that were associated with an increased risk of developing Crohn Disease and have functional implications, including the genes CCR6, IL12B, STAT3, JAK2, LRRK2, CDKAL1, and PTPN22.[20] Most of these genes are involved in signal transduction in the immune function.
The interlectin gene (ITLN1) is expressed in the small bowel and colon, and it is also involved in the recognition of certain microorganisms in the intestine. Other genome-wide association studies have found associations between susceptibility to Crohn disease and polymorphisms in genes that are associated with the intestinal milieu. One such study examined nearly 20,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 735 individuals with Crohn disease.[21] An association was found with the ATG16L1 gene, which encodes the autophagy-related 16-like protein, which is involved in the autophagosome pathway that processes intracellular bacteria.[21]
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in other autophagy genes have also shown association with susceptibility to Crohn disease, such as 2 polymorphisms that flanked the IRGM gene and may exert regulatory control for the gene.[22] Subsequently, there have been a number of other loci implicated in the autophagy pathway that have been associated with Crohn disease.[7]
There is strong support for IBD-susceptibility genes on chromosome 5p13.1, which is a gene desert but does modulate expression of the PTGER4 gene. A murine PTGER4 knockout model has significant susceptibility to severe colitis.[23] A large genomic study of multiple diseases confirmed many of the findings that were found in earlier studies, as well as several additional loci of interest for Crohn disease.[24]
Disruption of a homologous gene in a murine model resulted in defective development of the intestine.[25] It was hypothesized that changes in the expression of this gene could alter the migration of lymphocytes in the intestine and change its inflammatory response. The last locus discussed in this model is immediately upstream of the PTPN2 on chromosome 18p11 and encodes a T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase, which is a negative regulator of inflammation.[25]
Ulcerative colitis
The genetic predisposition for ulcerative colitis appears to be lesser in magnitude than Crohn disease but consists of a set of genetic susceptibilities that shows significant overlap with Crohn disease. One genome-wide association study found a previously unknown susceptibility locus at ECM1 and also showed several risk loci that were common to both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease.[26] Genes that confer risk for both diseases appear to influence the immune milieu of the intestine, whereas the genes that influence only Crohn disease appear to be involved mainly in autophagy.[26, 27]
Additional susceptibility loci for ulcerative colitis have been found on 1p36 and 12q15. The 1p36 single nucleotide polymorphism is near the PLA2G2E gene, which is involved in releasing arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids, leading to other proinflammatory lipids. The first 12q15 signal is located near the interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-26, and IL-22 genes, whereas the second 12q15 signal is located in IL-26 gene. These genes play roles in the immune response to pathogens as well as the tissue inflammation processes.[28]
Data suggest that genetic influences increase the risk for one form of IBD while decreasing the risk for another. In a Japanese population, the HLA-Cw*1202-B*5201-DRB1*1502 haplotype increases the risk for ulcerative colitis but reduces the risk for Crohn disease.[29] This finding has not been replicated in other ethnic groups. However, as the authors noted, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type in question in this study is relatively common in the Japanese population but relatively rare in European populations. They suggest that the HLA type will favor a T-helper immune response, predisposing toward ulcerative colitis, as opposed to an IFN-predominant response, predisposing more toward Crohn disease.[29]
The risk of developing ulcerative colitis is higher in nonsmokers and former smokers than in current smokers. The onset of ulcerative colitis occasionally appears to coincide with smoking cessation; however, this does not imply that smoking would improve the symptoms of ulcerative colitis. There has been limited success with the use of nicotine patches. Crohn disease patients have a higher incidence of smoking than the general population, and smoking appears to lessen the response to medical therapy.
Before 1960, the incidence of ulcerative colitis was several times higher than that of Crohn disease. More recent data suggest that the incidence of Crohn disease is approaching that of ulcerative colitis.
Annually, an estimated 700,000 physician visits and 100,000 hospitalizations are due to IBD.[30] Approximately 1-2 million people in the United States have ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease, with an incidence of 70-150 cases per 100,000 individuals.[31, 32] In persons of European descent in Olmstead County, Minnesota, the incidence of ulcerative colitis was 7.3 cases per 100,000 people per year, with a prevalence of 116 cases per 100,000 people; the incidence of Crohn disease was 5.8 cases per 100,000 people per year, with a prevalence of 133 cases per 100,000 people.[33, 34]
Racial, sexual, and age-related differences
The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among Americans of African descent is estimated to be the same as the prevalence among Americans of European descent, with the highest rates in the Jewish populations of middle European extraction.[35] There is a higher prevalence along a north-south axis in the United States[36] and in Europe,[37] although trends show that the gap is narrowing.
The male-to-female ratio is approximately 1:1 for ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease, with females having a slightly greater incidence. Both diseases are most commonly diagnosed in young adults (ie, late adolescence to the third decade of life).
The age distribution of newly diagnosed IBD cases is bell-shaped; the peak incidence occurs in people in the early part of the second decade of life, with the vast majority of new diagnoses made in people aged 15-40 years. A second, smaller peak in incidence occurs in patients aged 55-65 years and is increasing. Approximately 10% of IBD patients are younger than 18 years.
The highest rates of IBD are assumed to be in developed countries, and the lowest are considered to be in developing regions; colder-climate regions and urban areas have a greater rate of IBD than those of warmer climates and rural areas. Internationally, the incidence of IBD is approximately 0.5-24.5 cases per 100,000 person-years for ulcerative colitis and 0.1-16 cases per 100,000 person-years for Crohn disease.[30] Overall, the prevalence for IBD is 396 cases per 100,000 persons annually.[30]
A review of IBD reported that the prevalence of Crohn disease in North America was 319 per 100,000 persons, whereas in Europe, it was 322 per 100,000 persons.[31] Prevalence rates for ulcerative colitis were 249 per 100,000 persons in North America and 505 per 100,000 persons in Europe. The annual incidence of Crohn disease was 20.2 per 100,000 person-years in North America, 12.7 per 100,000 person-years in Europe, and 5.0 per 100,000 person-years in Asia and the Middle East, whereas incidence rates of ulcerative colitis were 19.2 per 100,000 person-years in North America, 24.3 per 100,000 person-years in Europe, and 6.3 per 100,000 person-years in Asia and the Middle East. Time-trend analyses showed statistically significant increases in the incidence of IBD over time.[31]
The standardized mortality ratio for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) ranges from approximately 1.4 times the general population (Sweden) to 5 times the general population (Spain). Most of this increase appears to be in the Crohn disease population; the ulcerative colitis population appears to have the same mortality rate as the general population.[38]
The majority of studies indicate a small but significant increase in mortality associated with IBD.[39] A frequent cause of death in persons with IBD is the primary disease[40] ; infections and COPD/respiratory illness are other major causes of death.[41] IBD is not a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality.[42]
Patients with IBD are more prone to the development of malignancy. Persons with Crohn disease have a higher rate of small bowel malignancy. Patients with pancolitis, particularly ulcerative colitis, are at a higher risk of developing colonic malignancy after 8-10 years of disease. The current standard of practice is to screen patients with colonoscopy at 1-2 year intervals once they have had the disease for greater than 10 years.
A comprehensive discussion regarding the diagnosis, management, and surveillance of colorectal cancer in patients with IBD is beyond the scope of this article. For more information, see the following 2 guidelines:
In addition to long-term, disease-related complications, patients can also experience morbidity from prolonged medical therapy, particularly as a consequence of steroid exposure.
There also appears to be an increased risk for IBD in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a population-based retrospective cohort study of 136,178 individuals with asthma and 143,904 individuals with COPD, Brassard and colleagues found a significantly increased incidence of IBD. The average incidences of CD and UC in asthma patients were 23.1 and 8.8/100,000 person-years, respectively. Corresponding figures in COPD patients were 26.2 CD and 17 UC cases/100,000 person-years, respectively.[46, 47]
Compared with the general population, the incidence of CD in asthma and COPD patients was 27% and 55% higher, and the incidence of UC was 30% higher among those with COPD. Among children up to 10 years old in the asthma group and adults aged 50 to 59 in the COPD group, the incidence of CD was more than twice that seen in the general population.[46, 47]
Psychologic morbidity affects patients with IBD, especially younger patients, and are typically associated with depression and anxiety symptoms but also exhibit externalizing behaviors.[48] Risk factors for psychologic morbidity appear to include increased disease severity, lower socioeconomic status, use of corticosteroids, parental stress, and older age at diagnosis.[48]
The average patient with ulcerative colitis has a 50% probability of having another flare during the next 2 years; however, patients may have only one flare over 25 years, and others may have almost persistently active disease. A small percentage of patients with ulcerative colitis have a single attack and no recurrence. Typically, remissions and exacerbations are characteristic of this disease, with acute attacks lasting weeks to months.
Patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum and sigmoid have a 50% chance of progressing to more extensive disease over 10 years[49] and a 7.5% rate of colectomy over 5 years.[50] Approximately 10% of patients presenting with proctitis will develop a pancolitis.[49, 50]
Surgical resection for ulcerative colitis is considered “curative” for this disease, although patients may experience symptoms related to the ileal pouch (J-pouch), including acute and chronic pouchitis. Pouchitis is far more common in patients who have had a colectomy for ulcerative colitis than in those who have had a colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.
Beyond 8-10 years after diagnosis, the risk of colorectal cancer increases by 0.5%-1.0% per year. Surveillance colonoscopies with random biopsies reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis by allowing the detection of low- or high-grade dysplasia and early stage carcinoma.
The clinical course of Crohn disease is much more variable than that of ulcerative colitis, and it is dependent on the anatomic location and extent of the disease. Periodic remissions and exacerbations are the rule in Crohn disease. The relapse rate over 10 years is 90%, and the cumulative probability of requiring surgery over 10 years is approximately 38%. Terminal ileum location, fistulizing, and structuring disease are all independent risk factors for subsequent surgery.[51]
A review of the literature indicates that approximately 80% of patients who are in remission for 1 year will remain in remission over subsequent years.[52] Patients with active disease in the past year have a 70% chance of having clinical disease activity in the following year. Approximately 20% of patients will have annual relapses, and 13% will have a course free of relapses. Less than 5% of patients with Crohn disease will have continually active disease.[52]
Surgery for Crohn disease is generally performed for complications (eg, stricture, stenosis, obstruction, fistula, bleeding, or abscess). Surgical intervention is an important treatment option for Crohn disease, but patients should be aware that it is not curative and that disease recurrence after surgery is high, mimicking the original disease pattern at the site of the surgical anastomosis.
Recurrence of perianal fistulas after medical or surgical treatment is common (59%-82%).[52] In one study, one year after surgery for Crohn disease, 20%-37% of patients had symptoms suggestive of clinical recurrence, and endoscopic evidence of recurrent inflammation was in the neoterminal ileum in 48%-93% of patients.[53]
Overall, the patient's quality of life with Crohn disease is generally lower than that of individuals with ulcerative colitis. Data suggest that in persons with Crohn colitis involving the entire colon, the risk of developing malignancy is equal to that in persons with ulcerative colitis; however, the risk is much smaller (albeit poorly quantified) in most patients with Crohn disease primarily involving the small bowel. Intestinal cancer may become a more important long-term complication in patients with Crohn disease because of longer survival.
Studies support evidence that specific CARD15 mutations are associated with the intestinal location of the disease, as well as course and prognosis,[8] and are correlated with the propensity for developing ileal strictures and with an early onset of disease.
Intestinal complications
IBD can be associated with several gastrointestinal complications, including risk of hemorrhage, perforation, strictures, and fistulas—as well as perianal disease and related complications, such as perianal or pelvic abscesses, toxic megacolon (complicating acute severe colitis), and malignancy (colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis).
Extraintestinal complications
Extraintestinal complications occur in approximately 20%-25% of patients with IBD.[1] In some cases, they may be more symptomatic than the bowel disease itself. These include osteoporosis (usually a consequence of prolonged corticosteroid use), hypercoagulability resulting in venous thromboembolism, anemia, gallstones, primary sclerosing cholangitis, aphthous ulcers, arthritis, iritis (uveitis) and episcleritis, and skin complications (pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum).
Table 1, below, summarizes the rates of the most common extraintestinal complications in patients with IBD the United States and Europe.
Table 1. Common Extraintestinal Complications of IBD in US and Europe[54]
View Table | See Table |
The Swiss National IBD Cohort Study also demonstrated the risks of extraintestinal complications of IBD; their results are summarized in Table 2, below.[55] The risk factors of having complications included family history and active disease observed for Crohn disease only; no significant risk factors were noted in patients with ulcerative colitis.[55]
Table 2. Extraintestinal Complications of IBD in Swiss Patients[55]
View Table | See Table |
Because inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, often lifelong disease that is frequently diagnosed in young adulthood, increasing patient knowledge improves medical compliance and assists in the management of symptoms.
Encourage the patient to join an IBD support group, such as the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America. This foundation can provide educational materials for patients and educational brochures for physicians.
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America
733 Third Avenue
Suite 510
New York, NY 10017
Phone: 800-932-2423
E-mail: info@ccfa.org
The manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) generally depend on the area of the intestinal tract involved. The commonly experienced symptoms of Crohn disease include recurrent abdominal pain and diarrhea. Sometimes, the diagnosis may be delayed by several months to a few years, as these symptoms are not specific for IBD. Patients with IBD may have symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with cramping, irregular bowel habits, and passage of mucus without blood or pus.
Systemic symptoms are common in IBD and include weight loss, fever, sweats, malaise, and arthralgias. A low-grade fever may be the first warning sign of a flare. Patients are commonly fatigued, which is often related to the pain, inflammation, and anemia that accompany disease activity. Recurrences may occur with emotional stress, infections or other acute illnesses, pregnancy, dietary problems, use of cathartics or antibiotics, or nonadherence to therapy. Children may present with growth retardation and delayed or failed sexual maturation. In 10%-20% of cases, patients present with extraintestinal manifestations, including arthritis, uveitis, or liver disease (see Complications).
Grossly bloody stools, occasionally with tenesmus, although typical of ulcerative colitis, are less common in Crohn disease. Stools may be formed, but loose stools predominate if the colon or the terminal ileum is involved extensively. Fifty percent of patients with Crohn disease may present with perianal disease (eg, fistulas, abscesses). Occasionally, acute right lower quadrant pain and fever, mimicking appendicitis or intestinal obstruction, may be noted. Weight loss is observed more commonly in Crohn disease than in ulcerative colitis because of the malabsorption associated with small bowel disease, or small bowel disease may act as an appetite deterrent. In addition, patients may reduce their food intake in an effort to control their symptoms.
The World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) indicates the following symptoms may be associated with inflammatory damage in the digestive tract[1] :
Other considerations include a family history of IBD, celiac disease, or colorectal cancer; the use of medications such as antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); the presence of mood disorders; the use of tobacco; and recent travel.[1]
Fever, tachycardia, dehydration, and toxicity may occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pallor may also be noted, reflecting anemia. The prevalence of these factors is directly related to the severity of the attack.
Toxic megacolon is a medical emergency. Patients appear septic; have high fever, lethargy, chills, and tachycardia; and have increasing abdominal pain, tenderness, and distention.
Patients with Crohn disease may develop a mass in the right lower quadrant. Perianal complications (eg, perianal fissures or fistulas, abscesses, rectal prolapse) may be observed in up to 90% of patients with this disease.[2] Common presenting signs include occult blood loss and low-grade fever, weight loss, and anemia. The rectal examination often reveals bloody stool or a positive Hemoccult stool test.
Growth retardation may be the only presenting sign of IBD in young patients. The physical examination should also include a search for extraintestinal manifestations, such as iritis, episcleritis, arthritis, and dermatologic involvement. (see Complications.)
Several laboratory studies are of value in assisting with the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and provide supporting information. However, no laboratory test is specific enough to adequately and definitively establish the diagnosis of IBD. Laboratory values may be used as surrogate markers for inflammation and nutritional status and to look for deficiencies of necessary vitamins and minerals. Serologic studies have been proposed to help diagnose IBD and to differentiate Crohn disease from ulcerative colitis, but such studies are not recommended for routine diagnosis of Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis.
In individuals who are immunosuppressed, are from third world countries, or have a history of travel, intestinal tuberculosis (TB) may need to be excluded. In such cases, tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) or interferon-gamma assays (eg, QuantiFERON-TB, T-SPOT, TB test) may be indicated, as well as culture for amebiasis, giardiasis, Strongyloides infection, and studies for histoplasmosis and coccidioidomycosis.[1] Chest radiography may exclude pulmonary TB, but this imaging modality does not exclude extrapulmonary TB.[1]
Complete blood cell count
The components of the complete blood cell (CBC) count can be useful indicators of disease activity and iron or vitamin deficiency. An elevated white blood cell (WBC) count is common in patients with active inflammatory disease and does not necessarily indicate infection.
Anemia is common and may be either an anemia of chronic disease (usually normal mean corpuscular volume [MCV]) or an iron deficiency anemia (MCV is often low). Anemia may result from acute or chronic blood loss, malabsorption (iron, folate, and vitamin B12) or may reflect the chronic disease state. Note that the MCV can be elevated in patients taking azathioprine (Imuran) or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). Generally, the platelet count is normal, or it may be elevated in the setting of active inflammation.
Nutritional evaluation: Vitamin B12 evaluation, iron studies, RBC folate, nutritional markers
Vitamin B12 deficiency can occur in patients with Crohn disease who have significant terminal ileum disease or in patients who have had terminal ileum resection. The standard replacement dose of vitamin B12 is 1000 mg subcutaneously (SC) every month, because oral replacement is often insufficient.
Serum iron studies should be obtained at the time of diagnosis, because active IBD is a source for GI blood loss, making iron deficiency common. A microcytic hypochromic anemia suggests iron deficiency; if confirmed with serum iron/total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), iron should be replaced either enterally or parenterally. For parenteral replacement, intravenous (IV) iron sucrose can be used, and dosing is based on the table in the package insert, with a maximum of 30 mL (1500 mg) at once.
Although folate deficiency is not common in persons with IBD, several concerns have been raised regarding this vitamin. Sulfasalazine (Azulfidine) is a folate reductase inhibitor and may inhibit normal uptake of folate; thus, many practitioners commonly administer folate supplements in patients taking sulfasalazine. Folate supplements are indicated in all women who are pregnant to help prevent neural tube defects; this is particularly true for patients with IBD, and supplementation with 2 mg/day or more (rather than the usual 1 mg/day) should be considered in those on sulfasalazine.
Nutritional status can be assessed by serum albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin levels. However, note that transferrin is an acute-phase reactant that can be falsely elevated in persons with active IBD. Hypoalbuminemia may reflect malnutrition because of poor oral intake or because of protein-losing enteropathy that can coexist with active IBD.
ESR and CRP levels
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level are often used as serologic markers for inflammation, but they are not specific for IBD. However, measuring such inflammatory markers also aids in monitoring disease activity and response to treatment. A small but significant number of patients with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis may not have elevated ESR or CRP levels even in the setting of significant active inflammation. In addition, inflammatory markers may be elevated in the setting of superimposed intestinal or extraintestinal infections.
Fecal calprotectin levels
Fecal calprotectin has been proposed as a noninvasive surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD.[57] As colorectal neoplasia and gastrointestinal infection also increase fecal calprotectin, this marker is not in widespread use. Note that relatives of patients with IBD may also have elevated levels of fecal calprotectin (with unknown degrees of inflammation).[57]
A study by Henderson et al indicated that fecal calprotectin has a high sensitivity and modest specificity for diagnosing IBD in children. The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 studies including 394 pediatric IBD cases and 321 non-IBD controls.[58, 59] The use of fecal calprotectin during the investigation of suspected pediatric IBD was associated with a pooled sensitivity of 97.8%, a pooled specificity of 68.2%, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.07, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.03.
Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) have been identified in some patients with ulcerative colitis, and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) have been found in patients with Crohn disease. The combination of positive pANCA and negative ASCA has high specificity for ulcerative colitis, whereas the inverse pattern—positive ASCA, negative pANCA—is more specific for Crohn disease.[1] However, false-positive (and false-negative) results are not uncommon; therefore, at this time, serologic markers cannot be used to definitively rule in or exclude inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Note that a variant of Crohn disease particularly involving the colon may result in a positive pANCA test, which may complicate the diagnosis. Serum response to anti-CBir1, an antibody associated with the presence of IBD, has been shown to differentiate pANCA-positive results in ulcerative colitis versus ulcerative colitis–like Crohn disease.[60]
Patients with Crohn disease who have a greater number of positive ASCA may be at a greater risk for complications such as strictures and fistulas, and they may also be at a higher risk for surgery. However, serologic markers do not appear to predict response to medical therapy, and there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of antibody testing to predict responses to medical treatment or surgery in patients with IBD.[60]
Before making a definitive diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), perform a stool culture, ova and parasite studies, bacterial pathogens culture, and evaluation for Clostridium difficile infection.[3] At a minimum, a C difficile toxin assay should be performed on any patient hospitalized with a flare of colitis, because pseudomembranous colitis is commonly superimposed on IBD colitis. Note that the level of the inflammatory marker calprotectin in feces correlates significantly with colonic inflammation in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease.[61]
Assessment for Cytomegalovirus colitis should be performed in cases refractory to steroids.[1] Amebiasis can be difficult to identify from the stool; therefore, consider serologic testing.
As many as 50-80% of cases of acute terminal ileitis may be due to Yersinia enterocolitis infections. This produces a picture of pseudoappendicitis. As with IBD, yersiniosis has a high frequency of secondary manifestations, such as erythema nodosum and monoarticular arthritis. Thus, in the right clinical setting, a suspicion for Yersinia should be considered.
Abdominal radiography may allow for assessment of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder for nephrolithiasis and the vertebral bodies for osteopenia or osteoporosis and sacroileitis. If severe fulminant colitis is present, abdominal radiography may reveal an edematous, irregular colon with thumbprinting (see the first image below). Occasionally, pneumatosis coli (air in the colonic wall) may be present. Free air and evidence of toxic megacolon, which appears as a long continuous segment of air-filled colon greater than 6 cm in diameter, indicates a surgical emergency. (See the images below.)
View Image | Plain abdominal radiograph of a patient with known ulcerative colitis who presented with an acute exacerbation of his symptoms. This image shows thumb.... |
View Image | Plain abdominal radiograph in a 26-year-old with a 10-year history of ulcerative colitis shows a long stricture/spasm of the ascending colon/cecum (<i.... |
View Image | Toxic megacolon. Courtesy of Dr. Pauline Chu. |
Toxic megacolon is a life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis and requires urgent surgical intervention. This condition occurs predominantly in the transverse colon, probably because air collects there in the supine position. The transverse colon is dilated, usually more than 8 cm (dilation more than 6 cm is considered abnormal). A colectomy is required if no improvement occurs within 24-48 hours. Repeat radiographs are required at 12- to 24-hour intervals to monitor the course of dilatation and to assess the need for emergency colectomy.
The barium enema imaging technique was one of the first studies that allowed characterization of the typical findings associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Barium enemas may be useful in cases of limited or no access to endoscopy, in cases of incomplete colonoscopy, or to measure stricture length.[1]
Several terms have been used to describe abnormalities found after barium studies of the colon, including the following:
View Image | Double-contrast barium enema study shows pseudopolyposis of the descending colon in a patient with ulcerative colitis. |
Barium can be refluxed into the terminal ileum in many cases (see the first image below), which can assist in the diagnosis of Crohn disease. The string sign (a narrow band of barium flowing through an inflamed or scarred area) in the terminal ileum is typical of one form of ileal Crohn disease observed on radiographs (see the first image below). Barium enema is contraindicated in patients with moderate to severe colitis, because it risks perforation or precipitation of a toxic megacolon (see the second image below).
View Image | Crohn disease involving the terminal ileum. Note the "string sign" in the right lower quadrant (viewer's left). |
View Image | Toxic megacolon. Courtesy of Dr. Pauline Chu. |
In Crohn disease, areas of segmental narrowing with loss of normal mucosa, fistula formation, and the string sign (a narrow band of barium flowing through an inflamed or scarred area) in the terminal ileum are typically observed on radiographs (see the images below). Some patients with ulcerative colitis also demonstrate inflammatory changes in the terminal ileum (ileitis), but these findings lack the skip pattern that is characteristic of Crohn disease.
View Image | Enteroenteric fistula noted on small bowel series of x-ray films in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The narrow-appearing segments filled ou.... |
The small bowel series, or small bowel follow-through (see the image below), can reveal inflammation, can assist in the assessment of stricture length and severity, and can help determine the most appropriate surgical approach. Fistulas may be demonstrated on films from a small bowel series, even if they are not suggested on the basis of the clinical evaluation.
View Image | Cobblestoning in Crohn disease. Spot views of the terminal ileum from a small bowel follow-through study demonstrates linear longitudinal and transver.... |
Although radiologists may remark on the abnormalities suggested in the cecum or ascending colon when the barium from a small bowel series enters the colon, independent confirmation must be sought because the presence of stool and dilution of the barium may make proper interpretation of colon findings difficult.
The small bowel series is usually sufficient for the evaluation of small intestine Crohn disease; however, in rare cases, it may not provide an adequate view of the terminal ileum, necessitating an enteroclysis.
Small bowel enteroclysis differs from a small bowel series in that a nasoenteric or oroenteric tube is placed and contrast material is instilled directly into the small intestine. This is usually performed when fine detail of the intestinal mucosa is required or the distal small intestine is not adequately seen on the small bowel series owing to dilution of the contrast agent as it passes through the (usually dilated) small bowel.
In fistulographic studies, contrast can also be inserted directly into an enterocutaneous fistula in order to help determine the course of the fistula in anticipation of surgical correction and to assist in guiding the surgical approach.
Ultrasonography (US) is a non-invasive technique in diagnosing Crohn disease. Although this technique has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 92%, it has less accuracy when disease is located proximal to the terminal ilium.[62] Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scanning have similar accuracy for the entire bowel and are reliable in identifying fistulas, abscesses, and stenosis; however, US may lead to false positives for abscesses. US and MRI are often preferred over CT scanning because of the lack of radiation risk, especially in younger patients.[62]
Findings on computed tomography (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis may be very suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Bowel wall thickening on CT scans is nonspecific and may occur from smooth muscle contraction alone, especially in the absence of other extraintestinal inflammatory changes; however, the presence of inflammatory changes (eg, mesenteric fat stranding, wall enhancement, increased vascularity ["comb sign"]) significantly increases the predictive value of the CT scan.
CT scanning is the ideal study to determine if the patient has abscesses, and it can be used to guide percutaneous drainage of these abscesses. Fistulas may also be detected on CT scans. CT scanning is best for demonstrating intra-abdominal abscesses, mesenteric inflammation, and fistulas. (See the following images.)
View Image | This computed tomography scan from a patient with terminal ileal Crohn disease shows an enteroenteral fistula (arrow) between loops of diseased small .... |
View Image | A teenaged patient with Crohn disease underwent a contrast-enhanced upper gastrointestinal computed tomography study with small-bowel follow-through. .... |
View Image | Computed tomography scan depicting Crohn disease in the fundus of the stomach. |
The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was validated in a prospective study that compared this imaging modality to the standard Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS).[63] MRI accurately assessed intestinal wall thickness, the presence and degree of edema, and ulcers in patients with Crohn disease. This study confirmed that through relative contrast enhancement (RCE), MRI can play an essential role in predicting disease activity and severity in Crohn disease.[63] In addition, pelvic MRI has a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of perirectal complications of Crohn disease.
A newer CT technique (called CT enterography) is a contrast CT technique in which larger than normal amounts of oral contrast are ingested by the patient. This technique, which requires a skilled radiologist, allows for better visualization of the small bowel mucosa and is considered by some to be superior to the small bowel x-ray series because of its ability to identify extraintestinal lesions; for diagnosing intestinal disease, it compares favorably with capsule enterography, ileocolonoscopy, and small bowel follow-through x-ray. In situations where repeated studies are needed, MR enterography may be considered in order to avoid excess radiation exposure.[64, 65, 66]
Colonoscopy is one of the most valuable tools available to the physician for the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), although its limitations must be recognized. Foremost, not all mucosal inflammation is idiopathic IBD. Infectious causes of inflammation must always be considered, as should diverticulitis and ischemia (which are far more common as new diagnoses in an elderly population than IBD, despite the similar colonoscopic and histologic appearance).
When used appropriately, colonoscopy can help determine the extent and severity of colitis, assist in guiding treatment, and provide tissue to assist in the diagnosis. In skilled hands, the colonoscope can frequently reach the terminal ileum and permit assessment of inflammation to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of Crohn disease. Inflammation may occasionally occur in the terminal ileum in patients with ulcerative colitis; this is referred to as a backwash ileitis and is mild, is nonulcerating, and may occur when a widely patent ileocecal valve is present. (See the following images.)
View Image | Severe colitis noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The mucosa is grossly denuded, with active bleeding noted. The p.... |
View Image | Stricture in the terminal ileum noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. This image depicts a narrowed segment visible u.... |
Colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy reveals that the rectum is almost always involved in ulcerative colitis, but it is frequently spared in Crohn disease. The disease can be limited to the rectum (proctitis); to the rectum, sigmoid, and descending colon (left-sided colitis); or to the entire colon (pancolitis). Ulcerative colitis does not involve any other segment of the GI tract. Colectomy is curative.
Colonoscopy with ileoscopy in the assessment of Crohn disease has a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 100%, leading to a positive predictive value of 100% as a diagnostic test.[67] When paired with small bowel follow-through, the sensitivity of this pair of diagnostic tests is increased to 78%, with a continued positive predictive value of 100%.[67]
Colonoscopy can also be used for therapeutic intervention in patients with IBD. The most common therapeutic use is stricture dilation in persons with Crohn disease. Colonic, anastomotic, and even small bowel strictures can often be dilated using pneumatic through-the-scope dilators. Intralesional injection of steroids (eg, triamcinolone at 5 mg in 4 quadrants) may help, but it is usually of transient value and has yet to be assessed in controlled trials.
Patients with IBD who are undergoing endoscopic procedures may have higher complication rates than the general population. The risks of colonoscopy apply (eg, reaction to medication, bleeding, perforation), and the risk of bleeding is increased in the presence of inflammation. The risk of perforation is also increased, particularly in patients taking high doses of steroids long term or who have severe colitis.
Colonoscopy also plays an important role in surveillance for colorectal cancer in patients with IBD. The utility of endoscopic surveillance can be further optimized by autofluorescence plus high-resolution endoscopy, chromoendoscopy-guided confocal laser microscopy, and confocal laser microscopy in combination with narrow-band imaging and high-resolution endoscopy, as well as chromoendoscopy with methylene-blue dye and spray-targeted biopsies.[68]
Flexible sigmoidoscopy is useful for a preliminary diagnosis in patients with chronic diarrhea or rectal bleeding; however, because of the limited length of the scope (60 cm), it can only help diagnose distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis. Rarely, Crohn colitis can be diagnosed based on flexible sigmoidoscopy findings. Note that sigmoid inflammation, particularly in older patients, may be confused with diverticulitis or ischemia.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is used for the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms, particularly in patients with Crohn disease. Aphthous ulceration occurs in the stomach and duodenum in 5%-10% of patients with Crohn disease. The diagnosis of Crohn disease may be made after gastric or duodenal ulcers fail to heal with acid suppression alone but is usually accompanied by ileal or ileocolonic Crohn disease.
Guidelines on the use of endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of IBD are available from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.[69]
In capsule enteroscopy, the patient swallows an encapsulated video camera that transmits images to a receiver outside the patient. It is most commonly used for finding obscure sources of gastrointestinal (GI) blood loss, the images can find ulcerations associated with Crohn disease if upper endoscopy and colonoscopy are unrevealing. In one study, the detection rate of abnormalities was 70.5% for patients with suspected small bowel disease, and the diagnostic yield for patients with obscure GI bleeding was higher (85.7%) than that for patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea (53.3%).[70]
Capsule enteroscopy may also aid in the diagnosis of small bowel Crohn disease when the standard diagnostic workup with colonoscopy and upper endoscopy is negative.[1]
However, not all small intestinal ulcerations represent manifestations of Crohn disease. The major risk is the potential for the camera to become lodged at the point of a stricture, which may necessitate operative intervention for removal. The risk of the standard capsule can be avoided with a preliminary exam by using a patency capsule that disintegrates if a stricture is encountered or by performing an alternative small bowel imaging study to first exclude such strictures in patients with suspicious symptoms.
Double balloon enteroscopy, or deep small bowel enteroscopy, is a technique whereby a long enteroscope is passed into the intestine using an overtube. Both the endoscope and the overtube have balloons that can be inflated and deflated sequentially as the endoscope is advanced in an "inchworm" fashion. Successful evaluation of the entire small intestine with this technique is reported to be as high as 86% to as low as 23%.[71, 72, 73, 74] However, patients who have had previous surgery have a higher complication rate (perforation) with this technique relative to other small bowel imaging techniques.
Ulcerative colitis is a superficial inflammation of the bowel wall almost entirely limited to the large bowel (when the cecum is involved, there may be some inflammation in the distal-most ileum, the so-called "backwash ileitis"). Only in complicated cases such as evolution into toxic megacolon are the deeper layers of the bowel wall involved with the inflammatory process.
Ulcerative colitis primarily involves the mucosa and the submucosa, with the formation of crypt abscesses and mucosal ulceration. The mucosa typically appears granular and friable. In more severe cases, pseudopolyps form, consisting of areas of hyperplastic growth with swollen mucosa surrounded by inflamed mucosa with shallow ulcers. In severe ulcerative colitis, inflammation and necrosis can extend below the lamina propria to involve the submucosa and the circular and longitudinal muscles.
Inflammation in ulcerative colitis almost always involves the rectum and is contiguous, regardless of the extent of the colon involved. The exception to this rule is that the initial inflammation may appear patchy during colonoscopy that is performed very early in the ulcerative colitis process, although biopsy specimens of the intervening normal-appearing mucosa often do reveal inflammation. The intestinal inflammation of ulcerative colitis only involves the colon. Biopsy specimens demonstrate neutrophilic infiltrate along with crypt abscesses and crypt distortion. Granulomas do not occur in ulcerative colitis. (See the following images.)
View Image | Chronic architectural changes in ulcerative colitis. Note the crypt branching and irregularity of size and shape, with an increase in chronic inflamma.... |
View Image | Low-power image of a colon biopsy specimen in a patient with ulcerative colitis illustrates changes limited to the mucosa. These changes include chron.... |
View Image | Chronic architectural changes in ulcerative colitis. Note the trifid crypt. |
The typical histologic findings of ulcerative colitis include expansion of chronic inflammation in the mucosa and, in active cases, the presence of acute inflammation. In mildly active cases, there is an acute cryptitis that progresses to crypt abscesses in moderately active cases. In severe cases, mucosal ulcers develop as a result of the ongoing acute inflammatory process. Areas of relatively preserved mucosa between ulcerated areas may have a polypoid appearance grossly and are referred to as "pseudopolyps." In cases of many years’ duration, dysplasia of the large bowel mucosa may develop and signifies an increased risk for the development of colorectal adenocarcinoma. (See the images below.)
View Image | High-power view of a crypt abscess in ulcerative colitis shows the crypt to be dilated and filled with neutrophils and debris. |
View Image | This is an example of low-grade glandular dysplasia in a patient with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Note the loss of mucin, nuclear hyperchromasia,.... |
View Image | High-grade dysplasia in the same patient as the previous image. There is significant cytologic atypia, with rounding of the nuclei and a greater degre.... |
View Image | Histologic section from another location in the same patient as the previous image. This field shows glands that are suspicious for invasive carcinoma.... |
The entire intestinal wall is involved with inflammation in Crohn disease. Biopsy specimens may demonstrate granulomas (approximately 50% of the time). The presence of granulomas is often helpful in making the diagnosis but is not necessary.
Because biopsy specimens obtained at colonoscopy are generally superficial mucosal samples, the pathologist may have difficulty making a definitive diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease based on histologic findings alone. However, histology also helps rule out other causes of inflammation, including infectious colitis and ischemic colitis. The characteristic pattern of inflammation in Crohn disease is a transmural involvement of the bowel wall by lymphoid infiltrates that contains sarcoidlike granulomas in about half of the cases (most commonly in the submucosa). Also characteristic are proliferative changes in the muscularis mucosa and in the nerves scattered in the bowel wall and myenteric plexus. In the involved foci of the small and large bowel, Paneth cell hyperplasia is frequent and areas of pyloric metaplasia may be seen. In full-blown cases, long and deep fissurelike ulcers form. (See the following images.)
View Image | Deep knifelike, fissuring, transmural ulcer in Crohn disease. |
View Image | Granuloma in the mucosa in a Crohn disease patient. |
View Image | Colonic granuloma in a patient with Crohn disease (arrow). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Courtesy of Dr E. Ruchelli. |
View Image | A crypt abscess demonstrating active, neutrophilic inflammation in Crohn disease. |
The two goals of therapy are the achievement of remission (induction) and the prevention of disease flares (maintenance). Note that a top-down approach, with earlier introduction of biologics and immunomodulators, is frequently advocated to forestall complications.[75]
The care of a patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be either medical or surgical in nature or, in many patients, a combination of both. The management algorithm is also dependent on whether the diagnosis is Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis. The medical approach for patients with IBD is both symptomatic care (ie, relief of symptoms) and mucosal healing following a stepwise approach to medication, with escalation of the medical regimen until a response is achieved.
The concept of deep mucosal healing, particularly in Crohn disease, is becoming increasingly advocated. There are several studies, primarily involving anti-TNF agents (and occasionally immune modifiers); that have shown that the elimination of inflammation (as demonstrated by endoscopic and histologic criteria) results in a decrease in the rate of surgery, the use of corticosteroids, and the rate of hospitalization.[76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82] This supports the use of immune-modifying agents (mercaptopurine or azathioprine) or one of the anti-TNF agents earlier in the course of IBD.[76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82]
In addition to treatment of the underlying inflammation, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may require symptomatic therapy, particularly when their symptoms are not related to active inflammation. Treatment with antidiarrheal agents such as loperamide or diphenoxylate/atropine should generally be avoided in patients with active inflammation, as these drugs can precipitate toxic megacolon in individuals with significant colonic inflammation. Similarly, other agents that may have anticholinergic effects should be avoided, although antispasmodic medications may sometimes be useful for symptomatic relief. In patients with Crohn disease who have significant ileal disease or who have had an ileal resection, diarrhea may sometimes be due to bile salt malabsorption. In such patients, treatment with bile-binding resins, such as cholestyramine, may be helpful in managing the diarrhea.
IBD flares in patients with mild to moderate disease are usually managed in an outpatient setting. However, an important and sometimes overlooked concern in the management of IBD is the dosing and duration of the use of corticosteroid therapy. For a flare of moderate severity, a dose of prednisone of 20-40 mg/day or equivalent is often sufficient to treat the flares. Once symptoms are controlled, a dedicated tapering of the steroid dose follows.
Patients are candidates for immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate) or anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) and biologic agents if flares are frequent (>1-2 times), if the duration of steroid use is prolonged (more than a few weeks per year), if reduction of the steroid dose causes recurrence of symptoms (steroid dependent), or if steroids do not appear to be working (steroid refractory).
A health maintenance issue of particular importance to patients with IBD is a reduction in bone density because of decreased calcium absorption (due to the underlying disease process) or corticosteroid use. Osteoporosis is a very serious complication, involving 40% of patients with IBD, and increases the risk for fractures. All patients who have been using steroids for longer than 3 months, as well as postmenopausal women, should undergo testing with bone-density studies; treatment with bisphosphonates and calcium supplements can be initiated in patients with significantly low bone density.
A stepwise approach (now generally referred to as the step-up approach), such as outlined in the following sections, may be taken in mild to moderate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
The first step in medication therapy for IBD is usually aminosalicylates. There are several different aminosalicylates, but none have been consistently demonstrated to be superior to the others for all patients. These agents appear to have greater efficacy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis than for Crohn disease, for which efficacy data are limited. For Crohn disease, metronidazole or ciprofloxacin is occasionally used, particularly for perianal disease or an inflammatory mass.
If the patient's condition fails to respond to an adequate dose of aminosalicylates, the second step is often corticosteroids, which tend to provide rapid relief of symptoms and a significant decrease in inflammation.[83] The most common range for moderate flares of IBD is oral prednisone at 10-40 mg/day; for more severe flares, the higher end of the range is used (occasionally doses up to 60 mg/day). Once a clinical response is seen, the dose is tapered. Most patients who use oral corticosteroids can tolerate a relatively rapid taper after a response is achieved; occasionally, a very prolonged steroid taper is necessary to prevent relapse in patients who have had prolonged exposure to steroids in the past. Inability to taper down the steroids without recurrence of symptoms should trigger discussion regarding the use of alternative drugs (immunomodulators or anti-TNF therapy).
The immune-modifying agents are step III drugs and are used if corticosteroids fail or are required for prolonged periods. Anti-TNF monoclonal antibody therapies are also step III drugs that are effective in both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis; some studies have demonstrated that they have a greater efficacy than azathioprine. Traditionally, anti-TNF agents have been administered when Crohn disease has been unresponsive to steroids and immunosuppressants; however, the early introduction of these agents in conjunction with immunosuppressants in those with an increased risk of a complicated, severe, or possibly aggressive IBD has the potential to modify the disease course.[75]
Drugs from different therapeutic classes may be used additively. In some patients with high-risk disease, a step-down approach with early introduction of stronger agents such as the anti-TNF agents has been advocated to prevent complications and improve patient outcomes. There are many situations, especially in patients with more severe disease, where the step-down approach is clearly in the patient’s best interest.
In general, one major goal is to wean the patient off steroids as soon as possible to prevent long-term adverse effects from these agents. Ardizzone et al suggest that a lack of mucosal healing after corticosteroid therapy is the only factor associated with negative outcomes at 5 years.[84]
The five oral aminosalicylate preparations available for use in the United States are sulfasalazine (Azulfidine), mesalamine (Asacol, Asacol HD, Pentasa, Lialda, Apriso), balsalazide (Colazal), and olsalazine (Dipentum). Enema and suppository formulations are also available. All of these are derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA); the major differences are in the mechanism and site of delivery. Some of these agents also have unique adverse effects lacking in other agents of this class.
All of the aminosalicylates are useful for treating flares of IBD and for maintaining remission. None of the aminosalicylates has been proven to have greater efficacy than any of the others for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. As a class, these agents appear to be more effective in persons with ulcerative colitis than in persons with Crohn disease; in persons with mild Crohn disease, the primary utility is for colonic disease (as is the case with sulfasalazine[1] ; administer folic acid if sulfasalazine is used). Aminosalicylates have only a weak effect in preventing recurrence after surgery in patients with Crohn disease.[85]
For patients in remission from distal ulcerative colitis, oral or rectal 5-ASA can be used to manage this disease, as well as a combination regimen of oral and topical 5-ASA.[1] In treating rectal disease, rectal 5-ASA is preferred over rectal steroids.[1] A dose response has been described regarding the use of these agents for ulcerative colitis. For moderate disease, a dose of 4.8 g/day of mesalamine has been shown to be more efficacious than 2.4 g/day.[86]
Supplementation of the high-potency probiotic mixtures (eg, VSL#3[24, 87, 88] ) have been shown in some reports to reduce ulcerative colitis disease activity index scores in patients with mild to moderate relapsing ulcerative colitis who are being treated with 5-ASA. Studies in patients with Crohn disease have been much less promising.
The antibiotics metronidazole and ciprofloxacin are the most commonly used antibiotics in persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). According to a systemic review, antituberculosis therapy, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, 5-nitroimidazoles, and rifaximin (alone or in combination) have not consistently been shown to induce remission in selective active Crohn disease and have rarely been shown to induce remission in ulcerative colitis.[89]
Antibiotics are used only sparingly in persons with ulcerative colitis because of limited treatment efficacy and because of an increased risk of developing antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. In persons with Crohn disease, antibiotics are used for various indications, most commonly for perianal disease, fistulas, and intra-abdominal inflammatory masses.
Antibiotics have potential adverse effects, including nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, and monilial (candidal) infections. Peripheral neuropathy can be observed in association with metronidazole and, when present, requires discontinuation of therapy with that drug. Finally, antibiotics can also increase the risk of Clostridium difficile colitis.
Corticosteroids are rapid-acting anti-inflammatory agents used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These drugs are indicated for acute flares of disease only and have no role in the maintenance of remission.
Corticosteroids may be administered by various routes depending on the location and severity of disease; they may be administered intravenously (ie, methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone), orally (ie, prednisone, prednisolone, budesonide, dexamethasone), or topically (ie, enema, suppository, or foam preparations).Corticosteroids are limited by their adverse effects, particularly with prolonged use.
The potential complications of corticosteroid use include fluid and electrolyte abnormalities, osteoporosis, avascular bone necrosis, peptic ulcers, cataracts, glaucoma, neurologic and endocrine dysfunctions, infectious complications, and occasional psychiatric disorders (including psychosis).
The consensus regarding treatment with these agents is that they should be tapered once remission has been induced. (see Surgical Intervention, below, for information on Tapering corticosteroids in the postoperative setting). Corticosteroids do not have a role in maintaining remission.
Patients who are concerned about immunosuppressive therapies, including immunomodulators or anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, should be educated about the potential greater incidence of complications occurring with long-term steroid use and with undertreated disease. Patients with prolonged use of steroids may also require ophthalmologic examination because of the risk of development of glaucoma and cataracts.
Periodic assessment of bone mineral density is recommended for patients taking steroids for more than 3 months.[90] Agents used for osteoporosis prevention and treatment (eg, the bisphosphonates) are useful for preventing the bone loss associated with corticosteroid use.
Intravenous corticosteroids are often used in patients who are severely ill and hospitalized; few data have been published on the optimum dosage of IV or oral corticosteroids. The upper end of dosing generally includes IV methylprednisolone at 20 mg every 6 hours or IV hydrocortisone at 100 mg every 8 hours. Typically, once a clinical response is observed (usually within 3-5 days), the dose of the IV corticosteroid can be tapered. Before hospital discharge, conversion to an oral corticosteroid is made with dosage tapering in an outpatient setting.
When oral corticosteroids are used, dosing is variable, and few data have been published to guide optimal dosing. The most common range for moderate flares of IBD is prednisone at 10-40 mg/day. For more severe flares, doses up to 60 mg/day may be used, but there are no supportive data. Once a clinical response is seen, the dose is tapered. Most patients who use oral corticosteroids can occasionally tolerate a relatively rapid taper after a response is achieved; a prolonged steroid taper is rarely necessary to prevent relapse. When the latter situation occurs, consider escalation of therapy with the use of alternative drugs (immune modifiers or anti-TNF therapy).
Budesonide (Entocort EC), a synthetic corticosteroid, is available for Crohn disease with ileal or ileocecal involvement.[70] Budesonide has extensive first-pass metabolism, which limits systemic adverse effects.[90] However, some absorption occurs over a prolonged period of exposure. Budesonide is also less effective than other standard glucocorticosteroids for the treatment of ileal Crohn disease and has not demonstrated efficacy in maintaining therapy beyond 12 months.[89]
According to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines, ileal-release preparations of budesonide are indicated for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate ileal and right-sided colonic Crohn disease.[90] These preparations have not been demonstrated to be effective in patients with ulcerative colitis, but clinical trials in this setting are under way.[90]
Topical corticosteroids are used in persons with distal colonic disease in a manner similar to that of topical mesalamine; the major difference is that even though topical mesalamine may be used to help maintain remission, topical corticosteroids are used for active disease and have only a small role in the maintenance of remission. According to AGA guidelines, topical therapy with either hydrocortisone (grade A recommendation) or budesonide (grade B recommendation) is effective for distal colonic inflammation in patients with mild to moderate IBD.[90]
Patients with ulcerative colitis with predominantly distal disease may be treated with topical budesonide, a synthetic steroid which has local anti-inflammatory effects and limited systemic effects.[91] Although topical budesonide is effective, novel oral controlled-release formulations have been developed to enable treatment of the entire colon.[91]
Cortenema, Cortifoam, and Anusol-HC suppositories are useful in treating distal disease (proctitis and proctosigmoiditis).
Immune modifiers have a slower onset of action (typically, a 2- to 3-month lag) and, consequently, are not used for induction of remission. However, these agents have shown effectiveness for their steroid-sparing action in persons with refractory disease; they are also used as primary treatment for fistulas and maintenance of remission in patients intolerant of or not responsive to aminosalicylates.
The immunomodulators 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine (AZA) are used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in whom remission is difficult to maintain with the aminosalicylates alone. Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporin A (CSA) and tacrolimus, as well as methotrexate (MTX), are also immune-modifying agents[1] ; CSA is almost exclusively limited to acute severe colitis, whereas tacrolimus has been used in both perianal Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.[1]
Data on MTX support the use of intramuscular MTX in Crohn disease, but such data are lacking in ulcerative colitis. The only trial of MTX in ulcerative colitis used a low-dose oral therapy[92] ; whether a higher-dose oral MTX or parenteral MTX (IM or SQ) may be effective in ulcerative colitis has not been studied. Several clinical trials showed that AZA continuation in patients with ulcerative colitis prevented relapse, as compared to those who discontinued the medication. However, other trials have shown trends but no statistically significant benefit of AZA in ulcerative colitis.[93]
The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), recommends that patients undergo assessment of the thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype or phenotype before starting therapy with AZA or 6-MP.[90] Individuals who have low enzyme activity or are homozygous deficient in the TPMT mutation are at risk of very severe leukopenia, with potential septic complications, and may not be good candidates for therapy with these drugs.[90]
About 11% of individuals with heterozygous TPMT activity respond well to therapy but are prone to myelotoxicity, although this can be minimized with the use of lower doses. These patients, as well as those with wild-type TPMT activity, require monitoring for complications.[90]
Adverse effects and monitoring
Use of immune modifiers mandates monitoring of blood parameters; they can cause significant neutropenia or pancytopenia that warrants a dose reduction or discontinuation. Routine complete blood cell (CBC) counts with differentials and platelet counts are checked monthly, and liver function tests (LFTs) can be performed intermittently. After a year of stable dosing with no difficulties with blood counts (except the expected lymphopenia), the interval between blood count monitoring can be increased.
The cytopenic effect is typically dose dependent, although some patients are more sensitive than others. The typical AZA dose is 2-2.5 mg/kg/day, whereas the dose of 6-MP is 1-1.5 mg/kg/day. In some studies, blood levels of 6-thioguanine has been shown to guide dosing, but such tests offer little advantage, at a much greater cost for routine monitoring and dose adjustment, over CBC counts and liver function tests. In independent studies, metabolite levels have not shown any correlation with clinical efficacy, but they may help in monitoring compliance.
Other adverse effects of the immune modifiers include fever, rash, infectious complications, hepatitis, pancreatitis, and bone marrow depression. The most common reason for discontinuing the immune modifiers within the first few weeks is the development of abdominal pain; occasionally, a biochemically demonstrable pancreatitis occurs.
Concerns have been raised about the development of malignancy in patients taking 6-MP and azathioprine. These agents have been associated with a 2- to 4-fold greater incidence of lymphoma and an increase in nonmelanoma skin cancers, but curiously, there is a 3.5-fold decrease in colorectal carcinoma.
Infliximab
Infliximab (Remicade) is an anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody that is administered by infusion for the treatment of Crohn disease. Infliximab is FDA approved for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease; it appears to have a higher efficacy rate in Crohn disease. Infliximab is generally administered as 3 separate infusions of 5 mg/kg for the induction of remission of moderate to severe IBD at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by infusions every 8 weeks for maintenance of remission. Vande Casteele et al found that targeting the trough concentrations of infliximab to levels of 3-7 μg/mL results in a more efficient use of this agent in patients with IBD.[94]
A systemic review of the efficacy of biologic therapies in IBD confirmed that anti-TNF-alpha agents and natalizumab were effective in inducing remission of active Crohn disease.[95] For Crohn disease, the response rate may be as high as 80% (the usual response rate to natalizumab is about 60%), and the induction of remission rate is 30%-50% after a single dose; with multiple dosing, higher rates of remission are attained. For ulcerative colitis, the response rates may be as high as 50%-70%.
Patients with moderate to severe Crohn disease who have documented active inflammation, dependence on corticosteroids and an inability to taper these agents, or disease refractory to steroids are most likely to benefit from anti-TNF therapy.[96] Before anti-TNF agents are administered, screening should be done for coexistent infection with perianal and abdominal abscess (including Mycobacterium tuberculosis), and caution is advised if a patient is a carrier for the hepatitis B virus.[96]
Cessation of infliximab therapy, even in patients who are in prolonged remission, is associated with high rates of disease flare. In a study of 115 patients with Crohn disease who were treated for a minimum of 1 year with infliximab and an antimetabolite, who had at least 6 months of corticosteroid-free remission, and who subsequently stopped infliximab therapy, 45% (52/115) had a relapse at a median of 28 months’ follow-up, with a 1-year relapse rate of 43.9%.[97] Risk factors for relapse included male sex, leukocyte count greater than 6.0 × 109/L, C-reactive protein level of 5.0 mg/L or greater, and a fecal calprotectin level of 300 µg/g or more. Re-treatment with infliximab was successful in 88% of patients who had a relapse.[97]
Infliximab is also indicated for the treatment of fistulizing Crohn disease. For this indication, the fistula responds (closes) in 68% of patients treated with infliximab, although 12% may develop an abscess. The response can be maintained by continuing regular dosing (ie, every 8 weeks) after the induction dose.
Adverse effects of infliximab
The adverse effects of infliximab are uncommon but can include hypersensitivity and flulike symptoms; the latter can often be avoided by pretreatment with acetaminophen and diphenhydramine. There have been rare reports of lupus-like reactions and lymphoproliferative malignancies, although whether the malignancies are related to the drug or to the underlying disease process remains uncertain; they are more likely to be due to the concomitant use of immunomodulators.
Adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab
Other anti-TNF agents include adalimumab (Humira), which is given by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks after a loading dose of 6 injections over 4 weeks[98] ; certolizumab pegol (Cimzia), which is given by SC injection every 4 weeks (only approved for Crohn diesase); and golimumab (Simponi), which is given by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks after two loading doses (only approved for ulcerative colitis).
Natalizumab
Natalizumab (Tysabri), an agent aimed at preventing the accumulation of lymphocytes in the diseased bowel by blocking the effects of both α4β7 integrin (gut specific) and α4β1 integrin (CNS specific), has been approved by the FDA, but it is only available through a restricted distribution program. Natalizumab is an intravenous medication that has shown efficacy in Crohn disease, but there have been 3 reports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a potentially fatal opportunistic viral infection. Risk is typically apparent in those with prior immunosuppressant exposure or with a duration of infusion for longer than 2 years.[99]
Vedolizumab
Vedolizumab (Entyvio), another integrin antagonist, is approved for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.[100] It is specific for α4β7 integrin. Approval was based on several phase 3 clinical trials that simultaneously evaluated vedolizumab for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease and involved patients in nearly 40 countries. Among patients with Crohn disease who had a response to induction therapy with vedolizumab, 39.0% of those assigned to vedolizumab every 8 weeks were in clinical remission at week 52, compared with 21.6% assigned to placebo.
In patients with ulcerative colitis who had a response to vedolizumab induction, 41.8% continued to be in clinical remission at 52 weeks compared with 15.9% of patient taking placebo.
Clinical trial agents tend to be disease-specific (ie, an agent works for Crohn disease but not for ulcerative colitis, or vice versa). These include anti-adhesion molecules and anticytokine therapies.[1] In Crohn disease, additional agents include T-cell marker therapies and mesenchymal stem cells; in ulcerative colitis, anti-inflammatory proteins have also been studied.[1]
Experimental agents used in persons with Crohn disease include thalidomide (50-300 mg/day PO) and interleukin (IL)-11 (1 mg/wk SC). Experimental agents used in persons with ulcerative colitis include nicotine patch (14-21 mg/day via topical patch), butyrate enema (100 mL per rectum twice daily), and heparin (10,000 U SC twice daily). Multiple contraindications, interactions, and precautions are associated with these drugs.
Patients should be admitted to the hospital if surgical intervention is anticipated or if their condition does not respond to outpatient treatment, if they are dehydrated, or if they have uncontrolled pain or diarrhea. Start IV hydration. If indicated, obtain an abdominal flat-plate image to exclude obstruction or megacolon. If the patient is nauseous or vomiting or has evidence of obstruction or megacolon, nasogastric intubation may be helpful. Consider early consultation with a surgeon in the setting of severe colitis or bowel obstruction.
If the patient has active colitis, send a stool sample for Clostridium difficile toxin assay and routine microbiologic culture. Laboratory studies to be considered include a complete blood cell (CBC) count with differential; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; levels of albumin, glucose, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, and BUN/creatinine; electrolyte status; and a pregnancy test in females of childbearing age.
Patients with acute severe colitis are treated with IV corticosteroids. Antibiotics are not routinely used but may be indicated in select patients. Electrolyte correction and, potentially, blood transfusion can be administered if indicated on the basis of laboratory findings. The IBD Sydney Organisation and the Australian Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Consensus Working Group recommendations include the following for patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis[101] :
Author information
Patients with suspected bowel obstruction should be given nothing by mouth (NPO), except for medications. Most patients with ulcerative colitis may maintain a regular (or low-fiber) diet, unless megacolon is present or surgery is being contemplated.
Although a colonoscopic evaluation may also be contemplated, consider the increased risk of perforation in persons with acute colitis. Assess and correct the posthydration CBC count and electrolyte levels, as indicated. Depending on the response to the initial interventions, advancement of the diet may be considered.
By the second or third hospital day, most patients should be showing clear evidence of clinical improvement with IV steroids. Assess the electrolyte status if IV fluids are still being administered. Consider advancement of the diet. The corticosteroid dose can be tapered. If the patient is not improving, consider other treatment options; these may include hyperalimentation, other medical therapies, surgical intervention, or transfer to a tertiary care facility.
Continue to advance the diet, as tolerated, on hospital day 4. Continue the switch to oral medications. Many patients with a flare of Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis may be discharged by this time (occasionally even sooner); some may require another day of IV therapy.
If no progress has been made in the patient's condition since admission, additional treatments are necessary, including surgery (see Surgical Intervention, below) or more aggressive medical treatments. Again, consider transfer to a tertiary care facility. If the patient has been unable to tolerate an oral diet, initiate hyperalimentation and/or reconsider surgical intervention.
Most patients should be able to be discharged on or before the fifth hospital day. A regular diet should be tolerated, with some restrictions if strictures are present. An ESR level may be obtained to assist in future disease assessment, but its result is unlikely to alter current management.
Discharge the patient on oral medications, with appropriate follow-up as an outpatient, typically within a few weeks.
Step-down therapy should be considered early in the management of patients with difficult or refractory disease. This approach uses immune modifiers or anti-TNF agents earlier in the treatment of the IBD patient than the step-up approach described earlier (see Overview of Stepwise Therapy, above).
If it is difficult to reduce the dose of corticosteroids, if the disease is refractory to corticosteroid therapy, or if patients are corticosteroid dependent, the use of immune modifiers 6-MP or azathioprine should be used. The typical dosing of 6-MP or azathioprine is 1-2 mg/kg/day. At higher doses, closer monitoring is warranted, including measurement of the thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme; obtaining 6-TG and 6-MMP levels; doing a CBC; and determining liver, kidney, pancreatic functions.
These agents are not used for acute flares, because the time from the initiation of treatment to the onset of significant action may be as long as 2-3 months. Response to immune modifiers may be dose dependent; monitoring of blood counts is required to protect the patient from the hematologic toxicity associated with these agents.
An alternative agent is infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha. The FDA approved infliximab for the treatment of Crohn disease in July 2005 and for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in August 2005. To be effective for maintaining remission, this medication is generally administered in 3 doses of 5 mg/kg over 6 weeks (at weeks 0, 2, and 6), with maintenance doses every 8 weeks.
A randomized, controlled trial demonstrated that adalimumab can induce remission in patients with Crohn disease that is refractory to treatment with infliximab.[102] This therapy led to mucosal healing and a reduction in hospitalization and surgical intervention. The rate of serious infection was 2%-4%, which was no greater than the rate in patients receiving placebo.[102]
Note that in September 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a notification regarding updates to the Black Box Warning for the entire class of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blockers.[103] The advisory included the risk of Legionella and Listeria infections, as well as consistency of the information in the Boxed Warning and the Warnings and Precautions sections regarding the risk of serious infections and the associated disease-causing organisms.[103]
A lifestyle change that may benefit patients with Crohn disease is smoking cessation. Tobacco use has been linked to increases in the number and severity of flares of Crohn disease, and smoking cessation alone is occasionally sufficient to achieve remission of refractory Crohn disease.
The top-down approach (ie, earlier use of immunomodulators and biologics) includes the need for steroid-enhanced mucosal healing and achieves an earlier and more complete remission than step-up therapy. A general rule of thumb is that once remission is achieved, the medications used to achieve remission should be continued, except steroids, which should be tapered off, because they have no role in maintaining remission[104] and their use may lead to debilitating illness, particularly after long-term use. Home infusion of IV hyperalimentation is becoming increasingly available for those rare patients with Crohn disease in whom prolonged bowel rest is necessary (eg, cases of severe fistulizing disease). Patients with a short bowel may require prolonged hyperalimentation.
Diseases of the lung (primarily chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) in Crohn disease are common comorbidities, primarily because of smoking; however, cardiovascular disease, although common in the older patient, does not have any direct link with IBD. IBD may also be a factor in the treatment of prostate cancer (to avoid rectal injury), but is generally not a factor in breast cancer.
Most of the concerns regarding the interaction of other disease processes and IBD revolve around the medications used to treat various conditions; therefore, the physician treating the older patient must continually be aware of the potential for medication interactions. Although the advent of electronic medical records makes it easier to check for such interactions, it remains up to the physician to determine which interactions are clinically significant.
Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used for cardiovascular and rheumatologic disorders; these agents and cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2) inhibitors are known to cause flares in IBD (not universally, but often enough to be clinically important).[105]
Most aminosalicylates do not have substantial interactions with non-IBD agents. The side effects of corticosteroids may be exacerbated in the older population, particularly in those with diabetes, accelerated bone loss, and cataract formation. The anti-TNF agents are generally contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) but can be used once the CHF is controlled. The immune-modifying agents have a clinically important interaction with allopurinol, as allopurinol tremendously increases the serum levels of mercaptopurine and azathioprine to the point where these agents can quickly manifest toxicity.
Ulcerative colitis is a surgically curable disease. However, Crohn disease can involve any segment of the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus; surgical resection is not curative, as recurrence is the norm. In addition, repeated need for surgery and bowel resection may result in short gut syndrome and dependence on parenteral nutrition.
Consider surgical intervention for patients in whom medical therapy fails, as it is curative for colonic disease, and for those with colonic dysplasia or malignancy.[3] Approximately 25%-30% of patients may require operative management.[1] The indications for colectomy are the following:
The surgical options for ulcerative colitis vary. Currently, the 2 most common choices are proctocolectomy with ileostomy and total proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.
The most common operation performed to treat ulcerative colitis is ileal pouch/anal anastomosis (IPAA). In this multistage procedure, a diverting ileostomy is performed and an ileal pouch is created and anastomosed directly to the anus, with complete removal of the rectal mucosa. After the ileoanal anastomosis is healed, the ileostomy is taken down, and flow through the anus is reestablished.
The major complication of this procedure is postoperative development of acute or chronic pouchitis. Very rarely, particularly in those with a preoperative diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, Crohn disease of the pouch may develop. IPAA offers an excellent option for younger patients with ulcerative colitis and those with concerns with body image. However, IPAA is also associated with a substantial rate of infertility (due to pelvic dissection).
Elective surgery can sometimes be performed laparoscopically. For fulminant colitis, the surgical procedure of choice consists of a subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy and creation of a Hartmann pouch.
A population-based study by de Silva et al showed that the primary predictors of severe postoperative complications are age and multiple comorbidities. Furthermore, the worst outcomes occurred when surgery was performed 14 or more days after hospital admission under emergency conditions in patients who had no response to medical treatment.[106]
For patients who plan to become pregnant, a subtotal colectomy is preferred to avoid the 48% decrease in fecundity with the IPAA procedure.
Surgery for Crohn disease is most commonly performed in patients with complications of the disease (ie, strictures, fistulas). Approximately 70% of patients with ileocolonic Crohn disease require surgical intervention.[1] In general, conservative resection is advocated (including potential stricturoplasty, as opposed to resective surgery) to preserve bowel length in case additional surgery is needed in the future.[4]
Although surgery is an important treatment option for Crohn disease, patients should be aware that it is not curative and that disease recurrence after surgery is the rule. Disease recurrence generally mimics the original disease pattern at the surgical anastomosis. Endoscopic evidence of recurrent inflammation is present in 93% of patients 1 year after surgery.
In segmental resection, a segment of intestine with active Crohn disease or a stricture is resected, and the remaining bowel is reanastomosed. In general, as little bowel as possible is resected, because the risk of disease recurrence is significant.[107]
In patients with a very short cicatrix stricture, a bowel-sparing stricturoplasty can be performed. In this procedure, a longitudinal incision is made across the stricture, and then the incision is repaired with a horizontal suture. All mucosa is spared, and the obstruction is relieved. As many as 6-8 stricturoplasties can be performed in a single operative session.
Stricturoplasty is associated with a 6%-8% rate of septic complications (2%-3% of patients require reoperation); this may be prevented with optimal preoperative management to control the inflammatory component of the stricture before surgical intervention.
Ileorectal or ileocolonic anastomosis is an option available to some patients who have distal ileal or proximal colonic disease. In patients with severe perianal fistulas, a diverting ileostomy or colostomy is an option. In this procedure, the distal colon is defunctionalized and a temporary ileostomy or colostomy is created. The ileostomy or colostomy is then taken down after 6 months or longer. Many patients who pursue this option choose to forego reanastomosis after placement of a stoma and a consequent improvement in quality of life. Approximately 50% of patients who have the reanastomosis performed have recurrences of perianal disease.
Symptomatic enteroenteric fistulas are generally resected, although recurrence is common. Postoperative medical therapy often prevents recurrence, although data are lacking regarding efficacy. A meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials suggested that 5-ASA preparations provide a very modest benefit for maintenance.[85] The preferred program of prevention varies between immunomodulators and biologic therapy.
Before undergoing major elective surgery, women with IBD should stop using combined oral contraception for a minimum of 4 weeks before the surgery, and alternative methods of contraception should be used.[108] Advise each patient when oral contraception can be restarted.
If a woman with IBD is considering sterilization, counsel her and her partner regarding alternative contraceptive methods (eg, long-acting reversible contraception, vasectomy). Note that in women with a history of pelvic or abdominal surgery, laparoscopic sterilization may not be considered an appropriate contraceptive method.[108]
If possible, the use of corticosteroids should be minimized before surgery. Poor postoperative outcomes have been associated with prednisone doses greater than 30 mg/day.[1]
The World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) recommendations for tapering corticosteroids depend on the duration of corticosteroid use, as follows[1] :
No known dietary or lifestyle changes prevent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and no known dietary substances have been consistently shown to cause activation of IBD. Tobacco use has been linked to increases in the number and severity of flares of Crohn disease, and smoking cessation can help achieve remission in patients with Crohn disease. Lactose intolerance is common in persons with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis and can mimic symptoms of IBD.
Although diet has been well demonstrated to have little or no influence on inflammatory activity in persons with ulcerative colitis, it may influence symptoms. For this reason, patients are often advised to make a variety of dietary modifications, especially adaptation of a low-residue diet, although the evidence does not support a low-residue diet as beneficial in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Such a diet, however, might decrease the frequency of bowel movements.
Unlike in patients with ulcerative colitis, diet can influence inflammatory activity in persons with Crohn disease. Nothing by mouth (NPO) can hasten the reduction of inflammation, as may the use of a liquid or predigested formula for enteral feeding. Although a meta-analysis in 1995 demonstrated that steroids were superior to liquid diet alone for Crohn disease, a liquid diet seemed superior to a regular diet for reducing inflammation. The problem with using enteral liquid diets, especially the predigested formulations, is that palatability limits the intake of adequate energy (calories) to meet patient requirements. Parenteral alimentation may be needed.
In a prospective study of 56 patients with quiescent Crohn disease on maintenance infliximab therapy (5 mg/kg, q 8 wk), Yamamoto et al found that concomitant enteral nutrition did not significantly improve the maintenance rate of clinical remission in patients with Crohn disease.[109] In the study, 32 patients received concomitant enteral nutrition (elemental diet infusion at night; a low-fat diet during the day), and 24 patients did not receive enteral nutrition and had no dietary restrictions.[109]
Multivitamin supplementation is recommended in patients with IBD.[1] For patients with vitamins B12 or vitamin D deficiency, supplementation of these vitamins should be given. The results of 2 studies suggest that the link between vitamin D and IBD may be of particular importance.[110, 111, 112]
In one of the studies, 3217 patients with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis and low vitamin D levels had an increased risk of surgery and hospitalization.[111] Crohn disease patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels lower than 20 ng/ml had an increased risk of surgery and IBD-related hospitalization than those with levels higher than 30 ng/ml. Similar estimates were seen for ulcerative colitis. In the other study, Crohn disease patients who took 2000 IU of vitamin D daily for 3 months gained muscle strength and improved quality of life.[112]
Patients receiving steroid therapy should receive vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Parenteral iron (IM weekly or IV) may be used in patients with chronic iron-deficiency anemia who are unable to tolerate the oral formulation.[1]
Generally, patients do not need to limit activity when IBD is quiescent. During disease flares, physical activity is limited only by the extent of fatigue and the abdominal pain or diarrhea the patient is experiencing. When abdominal pain persists beyond medical therapy-induced resolution of the active inflammation, other causes of pain must be considered, including abscess, stricture, nephrolithiasis, IBS, and psychiatric disease.
In most instances, diarrhea limits activity primarily because of the lack of immediate access to toilet facilities in many locations and/or occupations. Dehydration may be an issue, often requiring IV hydration or the use of oral rehydration solutions.
Moderate to vigorous physical activity for as long as 12 weeks has been shown to improve symptom scores and many specific quality-of-life dimensions, including energy, sleep, emotion, and physical functioning.[113] This degree of activity was defined as 20-60 minutes of intense exercise 3-5 days per week. The improvements occur despite lack of change in body weight, oral-anal transit time, bowel movements per week, or stool consistency. This study also highlights that symptomatic deterioration is more likely in physically inactive individuals.
Clinicians are advised to review the prescribing information for medications in women who are attempting to conceive, are pregnant, or are breastfeeding.[108] All of the aminosalicylates (sulfasalazine, mesalamine, olsalazine, balsalazide) and corticosteroids appear to be safe in women in all phases of fertility, pregnancy, and lactation. Men should avoid sulfasalazine during periods when they and their mates are attempting to become pregnant.
In women with IBD, fertility is normal or only minimally impaired. The majority of case reports and small series show no adverse outcomes of pregnancies in patients with IBD who are taking immune modifiers. Birth defects have not been reported at a rate higher than that of the general population. If a patient is taking an immune modifier and becomes pregnant, current data support the consensus that continuing the immune modifier throughout the pregnancy is the safest course of action for both the mother and the fetus.[114]
The only agent that is contraindicated in women considering pregnancy is methotrexate (MTX), which has demonstrated teratogenic effects. MTX should be discontinued 3 months prior to planned conception.
For men with IBD, sulfasalazine can decrease sperm counts and sperm motility, causing a functional azoospermia; the other aminosalicylates do not have this effect. The sperm effects are reversible by discontinuing the sulfasalazine. No firm evidence indicates that the use of immune modifiers in the father leads to increased birth defects, although this has been suggested in one Spanish study.
Most infants born to parents with IBD are healthy. The prevalence of prematurity, stillbirth, and birth defects is similar to that in the general population. The prevalence of spontaneous abortion is slightly higher in patients with IBD (12.2%) than in the general population (9.9%). Previous proctocolectomy or ileostomy is not an impediment to successful pregnancy; however, controversy exists regarding the type of delivery (cesarean or vaginal) that is most appropriate when a woman has had ileal pouch/anal anastomosis surgery.[108] Women who have undergone such a procedure should consult with their obstetricians and gastroenterologists.[108]
The aminosalicylates, including sulfasalazine, are safe during pregnancy. Folate supplements should be taken. Corticosteroids are also safe, but if high doses are needed near the end of the pregnancy, monitor the infant for signs of adrenal suppression. Continuation of immune modifiers (ie, 6-MP, azathioprine) appears to be safe in pregnancy,[105, 115] as well as metronidazole (Flagyl) and ciprofloxacin (Cipro).
It is considered safe to continue TNF-alpha inhibitors during pregnancy (FDA category B), but concerns have been raised about high levels of maternally administered anti-TNF agents being found in the fetal circulation.[116, 117, 118, 119] The manufacturers of infliximab and adalimumab recommend that these 2 agents be discontinued during the third trimester of pregnancy, although there is no documentation of fetal harm. Certolizumab does not cross the placenta.[116, 117, 118, 119]
In a retrospective, multicenter study, treatment of IBD with thiopurines and anti-TNF-alpha drugs did not increase the risk of complications during pregnancy or neonatal complications.[120] The rate of unfavorable Global Pregnancy Outcome and the rate of neonatal complications were lower in pregnant women treated with thiopurines alone than in those exposed to anti-TNF-alpha drugs or those not exposed to either group of agents.
Effective contraception must be used with certain drug therapy.[108] Both male and female partners receiving methotrexate should use effective contraception for a minimum of 3 months following treatment with this agent.
Other concerns that have been raised include the potential reduction of fertility with total abdominal colectomy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (primarily because of adhesions).[121, 122] This possibility can likely be avoided by using a laparoscopic approach, and if infertility occurs, fertility can often be normalized by lysis of adhesions.
According to the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Effectiveness Unit in the United Kingdom, women with IBD should plan for conception when their disease is stable and well controlled.[108] Male and female patients require prepregnancy counseling to help them with the best management of their condition before conception occurs.[108]
Contraception precautions
Advise women who have Crohn disease with small bowel disease and malabsorption that oral contraception may have reduced effectiveness.[108] Additional contraception is recommended for women on combined hormonal contraception who are also receiving antibiotic regimens for less than 3 weeks, as well as for 7 weeks following cessation of the antibiotic. Note that certain medications prescribed for rectal or genital use may adversely affect the efficacy of condoms.[108] In addition, consider whether contraceptive agents may have an effect on diseases associated with IBD (eg, osteoporosis, venous thromboembolism, primary sclerosing cholangitis).
In women with IBD who will undergo major elective surgery, combined oral contraception should be discontinued for a minimum of 4 weeks before the procedure.[108] These women should use alternative contraception.
Sulfasalazine metabolites can be detected in the breast milk. Low concentrations of mesalamine and higher concentrations of its metabolites can also be detected in breast milk, but the significance of this is unknown. In addition, corticosteroids can also be detected in breast milk.
Immune modifiers are excreted in breast milk and should be considered only on a case-by-case basis; either the immune modifier should be discontinued or the infant should be bottle fed.
Antibiotics (metronidazole [Flagyl], ciprofloxacin [Cipro]) should generally be avoided during lactation, because they are excreted in breast milk; either breastfeeding or the drugs should be discontinued. These agents are probably safe for fertility and during pregnancy.
Anti-TNF agents (ie, infliximab, adalimumab) traverse the placenta, whereas certolizumab does not, because of the absence of the Fc fragment. They are found in the cord blood but not in breast milk.
Although small amounts of the topical agents are absorbed and thus may be excreted in breast milk, the concentrations are much lower than those with the oral forms of the same medications. These medications are probably reasonably safe in breastfeeding.
In patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with complications such as strictures or fistulas, and with flares requiring hospitalization, consultation with a surgeon is often required. Early consultation with a surgeon is particularly important in patients with severe disease or extraluminal complications, because delayed surgery can be associated with poorer outcomes.
An interventional radiologist may be consulted when percutaneous drainage of an abscess is desired. Specialty consultation is best for managing extracolonic manifestations (ie, uveitis, arthritis, dermatitis, sclerosing cholangitis). Also consider arranging consultations for patients with a registered dietitian and a stoma nurse, if indicated.
Many inflammatory mediators have been identified in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); antibodies against these mediators and methods to block the production or receptors for these mediators hold great promise as potential therapy for IBD.
Therapy for Crohn disease is generally less effective than that for ulcerative colitis. In addition to the therapies outlined herein, IV cyclosporine or infliximab is helpful in refractory ulcerative colitis. A conventional stepwise approach may be taken. With this approach, the most benign (or temporary) drugs are used first. If they fail to provide relief, drugs from a higher step are used. However, more aggressive disease requires immunomodulator and biologic therapy earlier in the treatment program.
The stepwise approach is as follows:
Note that drugs from all steps may be used additively; in general, the goal is to wean the patient off steroids as soon as possible to prevent long-term adverse effects from these agents. Opinions differ regarding the use of certain agents in this stepwise approach.
Clinical Context: Sulfasalazine is considered best for colonic disease, although it is also considered first-line therapy for Crohn disease. This agent is used for acute disease and for maintenance of remission.
Clinical Context: Mesalamine is a 5-ASA that acts systemically and also has activity as a topical anti-inflammatory.
Clinical Context: Balsalazide is a prodrug 5-ASA connected to a 4-aminobenzoyl-(beta)-alanine carrier by an azo bond; colonic bacteria break the azo bond, releasing the active 5-ASA. Metabolites of the drug may decrease inflammation by blocking the production of arachidonic acid metabolites in colonic mucosa.
Clinical Context: Olsalazine is useful for active disease and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Dipentum is a 5-ASA connected to a 5-ASA by an azo bond; colonic bacteria break the azo bond, releasing the active 5-ASA. Note that an adverse event of high ileal secretion of chloride creates a different type of diarrhea, which lessens its acceptability.
The 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) derivatives are effective in reducing inflammatory reactions. All of the aminosalicylates are useful for treating flares of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and occasionally Crohn colitis and for maintaining remission.
Clinical Context: Metronidazole is a widely available, inexpensive antibiotic and antiprotozoal agent. This agent inhibits protein synthesis and causes cell death in susceptible organisms by diffusing into the organism and causing a loss of helical DNA structure and strand breakage. Metronidazole's adverse-event profile includes headache, dysgeusia, and neuropathy.
Clinical Context: Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of urinary, skin, and respiratory tract infections. This agent inhibits bacterial DNA synthesis and, consequently, growth by inhibiting DNA gyrase and topoisomerases, which are required for replication, transcription, and translation of genetic material. Caution is advised with the use of ciprofloxacin regarding tendon rupture.
Clinical Context: Rifaximin is a nonabsorbed (<0.4%), broad-spectrum antibiotic specific for enteric pathogens of the gastrointestinal tract (ie, gram-positive, gram-negative, aerobic, anaerobic). It is a rifampin structural analog and it binds to the beta-subunit of bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, thereby inhibiting RNA synthesis.
Metronidazole (Flagyl) and ciprofloxacin (Cipro) are the most commonly used antibiotics in persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Antibiotics are less effective in persons with ulcerative colitis, except in fulminant toxic megacolon or pouchitis. Rifaximin (Xifaxan) is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antibiotic that may also help treat patients with IBD.
Clinical Context: Adrenocortical steroids act as potent inhibitors of inflammation. They may cause profound and varied metabolic effects, particularly in relation to salt, water, and glucose tolerance, in addition to their modification of the immune response of the body. Alternative adrenocortical steroids may be used in equivalent dosage.
Clinical Context: Prednisone acts as a potent inhibitor of inflammation. It may cause profound and varied metabolic effects, particularly in relation to salt, water, and glucose tolerance, in addition to their modification of the immune response of the body. Alternative corticosteroids may be used in equivalent dosage.
Clinical Context: Adrenocortical steroids act as potent inhibitors of inflammation and may cause profound and varied metabolic effects, particularly in relation to salt, water, and glucose tolerance, in addition to modification of the immune response. Alternative adrenocortical steroids may be used in equivalent dosage. Methylprednisolone has a greater salt- and water-retention side effect.
Clinical Context: Corticosteroids act as potent inhibitors of inflammation. They may cause profound and varied metabolic effects, particularly in relation to salt, water, and glucose tolerance, in addition to modification of the immune response. Alternative corticosteroids may be used in equivalent dosage.
Clinical Context: Budesonide alters the level of inflammation in tissues by inhibiting multiple types of inflammatory cells and decreasing the production of cytokines and other mediators involved in inflammatory reactions. Only 10% is bioavailable because of first-pass metabolism.
Clinical Context: Dexamethasone has many pharmacologic benefits, but there are also significant adverse effects. It stabilizes cell and lysosomal membranes, increases surfactant synthesis, increases serum vitamin A concentrations, and inhibits prostaglandin and proinflammatory cytokines.
Corticosteroid agents are the treatments of choice for an acute inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) attack; administer intravenously in severe disease. Administer increased or stress doses to patients already on steroids. Do not use steroids for maintaining IBD remission, because of their lack of efficacy and potential complications, including avascular bone necrosis, osteoporosis, cataracts, emotional lability, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cushingoid features, acne, and facial hair. Cortenema, Cortifoam, and Anusol-HC suppositories are useful in treating distal disease (proctitis and proctosigmoiditis).
Clinical Context: Azathioprine inhibits mitosis and cellular metabolism by antagonizing purine metabolism and inhibiting synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins; these effects may decrease the proliferation of immune cells and result in lower autoimmune activity.
Clinical Context: 6-Mercaptopurine is a purine analog that inhibits DNA and RNA synthesis, causing arrest of cell proliferation.
Clinical Context: Methotrexate impairs DNA synthesis and induces the apoptosis and reduction in interleukin (IL)-1 production. It is indicated for moderate to severe disease and maintenance of remission. The onset of action is delayed.
Clinical Context: According to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines, intravenous cyclosporine is effective for avoiding surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis who have failed to respond to 7-10 days of high-dose oral or parenteral corticosteroids. Concomitant administration of IV corticosteroids is recommended in these cases.
Cyclosporine is a cyclic polypeptide that suppresses some humoral immunity and, to a greater extent, cell-mediated immune reactions, such as delayed hypersensitivity, allograft rejection, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, and graft-versus-host disease.
For children and adults, dosing is based on ideal body weight.
Immunosuppressant agents are useful as steroid-sparing agents, in healing fistulas, and in patients with serious contraindications to surgery.[104] These drugs are used in patients who are refractory to or unable to tolerate steroids and in patients in whom remission is difficult to maintain with the aminosalicylates alone. Azathioprine and its metabolite, 6-mercaptopurine (MP), are useful in Crohn disease complicated by recurrent rectal fistulas or perianal disease; however, the clinical response can take up to 6 months. Methotrexate has also been tried.
Clinical Context: Infliximab neutralizes cytokine TNF-alpha and inhibits its binding to the TNF-alpha receptor. It is mixed in 250 mL of normal saline and infused IV over 2 hours. It is indicated for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease.
Clinical Context: Adalimumab is a TNF blocking agent that has been FDA approved for both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. It is administered by subcutaneous injection.
Adalimumab is recombinant human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody specific for human TNF. It binds specifically to TNF-alpha and blocks the interaction with p55 and p75 cell-surface TNF receptors.
Clinical Context: Certolizumab is a TNF blocking agent that has been FDA approved for the treatment of Crohn disease but not for ulcerative colitis. It is administered by subcutaneous injection.
Certolizumab pegol is a pegylated antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)–alpha blocker, which results in disruption of the inflammatory process. It is indicated for moderate to severe Crohn disease in individuals whose condition has not responded to conventional therapies.
Clinical Context: Human anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody. Indicated for ulcerative colitis but not Crohn disease. It is administered by SC injection.
Monoclonal antibodies targeted against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) interrupt endogenous TNF. Increased TNFα levels have been observed in Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis and are thought to be part of the pathogenesis of IBD. TNFα induces proinflammatory cytokines (eg, interleukins), enhances leukocyte migration, activates neutrophils and eosinophils, and induces enzymatic degradation.
This class includes adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, and infliximab. Infliximab and adalimumab are FDA approved for both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, whereas certolizumab is FDA approved only for Crohn disease and golimumab only for ulcerative colitis.
Infliximab was the first of this class for use in inflammatory bowel disease.[69] Infliximab is more effective against Crohn disease than ulcerative colitis. This drug promotes mucosal healing; heals perianal and enterocutaneous fistulas; and has been shown to reduce signs and symptoms, achieve clinical remission and mucosal healing, and eliminate corticosteroid use.[123] Infliximab is indicated for patients who have experienced inadequate response to conventional therapy.[104]
Clinical Context: Natalizumab is a recombinant humanized IgG4-1C monoclonal antibody produced in murine myeloma cells. It binds to alpha-4 subunits of α4β1 and α4β7 integrins expressed on the leukocyte surface, which inhibit α4-mediated leukocyte adhesion to their receptors. In Crohn disease, the interaction of the α4β7 integrin with the endothelial receptor MAdCAM-1 has been implicated as an important contributor to the chronic inflammation that is a hallmark of the disease.
Clinical Context: Vedolizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to α4β7 integrin. It blocks the interaction of α4β7 integrin with a gut-associated addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) and inhibits the migration of memory T-lymphocytes across the endothelium into inflamed gastrointestinal parenchymal tissue. It is indicated for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease.
Integrin inhibitors are emerging as options for moderate-to-severe IBD in patients who have had an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to a TNF blocker or immunomodulator; or had an inadequate response with, were intolerant to, or demonstrated dependence on corticosteroids.
Clinical Context: Cimetidine inhibits histamine at H2 receptors of gastric parietal cells, which results in reduced gastric acid secretion, gastric volume, and hydrogen concentrations.
Clinical Context: Ranitidine inhibits histamine stimulation of the H2 receptor in gastric parietal cells, which, in turn, reduces gastric acid secretion, gastric volume, and hydrogen ion concentrations.
Clinical Context: Famotidine competitively inhibits histamine at H2 receptor of gastric parietal cells, resulting in reduced gastric acid secretion, gastric volume, and hydrogen ion concentrations.
Clinical Context: Nizatidine competitively inhibits histamine at the H2 receptor of the gastric parietal cells, resulting in reduced gastric acid secretion, gastric volume, and hydrogen concentrations.
H2-receptor antagonists are reversible competitive blockers of histamines at the H2 receptors, particularly those in the gastric parietal cells, where they inhibit acid secretion. The H2 antagonists are highly selective, do not affect the H1 receptors, and are not anticholinergic agents.
Clinical Context: Omeprazole decreases gastric acid secretion by inhibiting the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase pump.
Clinical Context: Lansoprazole suppresses gastric acid secretion by specific inhibition of the H+/K+-ATPase enzyme system (ie, proton pump) at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell. It blocks the final step of acid production. The effect is dose-related and inhibits both basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion, thus increasing the gastric pH.
Clinical Context: Esomeprazole magnesium is an S-isomer of omeprazole. It inhibits gastric acid secretion by inhibiting the H+/K+-ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of gastric parietal cells. Esomeprazole is used in severe cases and in patients not responding to H2-antagonist therapy. This agent is used for up to 4 weeks to treat and relieve symptoms of active duodenal ulcers; however, it may be used for up to 8 weeks to treat all grades of erosive esophagitis.
Clinical Context: Rabeprazole sodium decreases gastric acid secretion by inhibiting the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase pump.
Clinical Context: Pantoprazole suppresses gastric acid secretion by specifically inhibiting the H+/K+-ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of gastric parietal cells.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce gastric acid secretion by inhibition of the H+ -K+ -ATPase enzyme system in the gastric parietal cells. These agents are used in patients with severe esophagitis and in patients whose disease is not responsive to H2-antagonist therapy.
Clinical Context: Diphenoxylate and atropine is a drug combination that acts as an antidiarrheal agent chemically related to the narcotic analgesic meperidine. This agent acts on intestinal muscles to inhibit peristalsis and slow intestinal motility, prolonging the movement of electrolytes and fluid through the bowel, and increasing the viscosity. A subtherapeutic dose of anticholinergic atropine sulfate is added to discourage overdosage, in which case diphenoxylate may clinically mimic the effects of codeine.
Clinical Context: Loperamide acts on intestinal muscles to inhibit peristalsis and slow intestinal motility. It prolongs the movement of electrolytes and fluid through the bowel and increases viscosity.
These agents provide symptomatic relief when patients report symptoms of diarrhea.
Clinical Context: Dicyclomine is used to treat gastrointestinal motility disturbances. It blocks the action of acetylcholine at parasympathetic sites in secretory glands, smooth muscle, and the central nervous system (CNS).
Clinical Context: Hyoscyamine blocks the action of acetylcholine at parasympathetic sites in smooth muscle, secretory glands, and the CNS, which, in turn, has antispasmodic effects. The sublingual (SL) tablets may be administered orally, sublingually, or chewed.
Anticholinergic antispasmodic agents are used to treat spastic disorders of the gastrointestinal tract.
Stricture in the terminal ileum noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. This image depicts a narrowed segment visible upon intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope. Relatively little active inflammation is present, indicating that this is a cicatrix stricture.
Enteroenteric fistula noted on small bowel series of x-ray films in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The narrow-appearing segments filled out relatively normally on subsequent films. Note that barium is just starting to enter the cecum in the right lower quadrant (viewer's left), but the barium has also started to enter the sigmoid colon toward the bottom of the picture, thus indicating the presence of a fistula from the small bowel to the sigmoid colon.
Cobblestoning in Crohn disease. Spot views of the terminal ileum from a small bowel follow-through study demonstrates linear longitudinal and transverse ulcerations that create a cobblestone appearance. Also, note the relatively greater involvement of the mesenteric side of the terminal ileum and the displacement of the involved loop away from the normal small bowel secondary to mesenteric inflammation and fibrofatty proliferation.
A teenaged patient with Crohn disease underwent a contrast-enhanced upper gastrointestinal computed tomography study with small-bowel follow-through. Several loops of small bowel are in the pelvis. Note there is a loop of distal bowel with a thickened wall (solid arrow), which is contrasted with a less involved loop of bowel in which the intestinal wall is not thickened at all (dotted arrow).
Stricture in the terminal ileum noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. This image depicts a narrowed segment visible upon intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope. Relatively little active inflammation is present, indicating that this is a cicatrix stricture.
Stricture in the terminal ileum noted during colonoscopy in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. This image depicts a narrowed segment visible upon intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope. Relatively little active inflammation is present, indicating that this is a cicatrix stricture.
Enteroenteric fistula noted on small bowel series of x-ray films in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. The narrow-appearing segments filled out relatively normally on subsequent films. Note that barium is just starting to enter the cecum in the right lower quadrant (viewer's left), but the barium has also started to enter the sigmoid colon toward the bottom of the picture, thus indicating the presence of a fistula from the small bowel to the sigmoid colon.
Cobblestoning in Crohn disease. Spot views of the terminal ileum from a small bowel follow-through study demonstrates linear longitudinal and transverse ulcerations that create a cobblestone appearance. Also, note the relatively greater involvement of the mesenteric side of the terminal ileum and the displacement of the involved loop away from the normal small bowel secondary to mesenteric inflammation and fibrofatty proliferation.
A teenaged patient with Crohn disease underwent a contrast-enhanced upper gastrointestinal computed tomography study with small-bowel follow-through. Several loops of small bowel are in the pelvis. Note there is a loop of distal bowel with a thickened wall (solid arrow), which is contrasted with a less involved loop of bowel in which the intestinal wall is not thickened at all (dotted arrow).
Complication Prevalence Scleritis 18% Anterior uveitis 17% Gall stones (particularly in Crohn disease) 13%-34% Inflammatory arthritis 10%-35% Anemia 9%-74% Aphthous stomatitis 4%-20% Osteoporosis 2%-20% Erythema nodosum 2%-20% Source: Larson S, Bendtzen K, Nielsen OH. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Ann Med. 2010;42:97-114.
Complication Crohn Disease Ulcerative Colitis Arthritis 33% 4% Aphthous stomatitis 10% 4% Uveitis 6% 3% Erythema nodosum 6% 3% Ankylosing spondylitis 6% 2% Psoriasis 2% 1% Pyoderma gangrenosum 2% 2% Primary sclerosing cholangitis 1% 4% Source: Vavricka SR, Brun L, Ballabeni P, et al. Frequency and risk factors for extraintestinal manifestations in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:110-9.