Phyllodes tumor—once more commonly referred to as cystosarcoma phyllodes (from Greek kystis ["sac, bladder"], sarkoma ["fleshy tumor"], and phyllon ["leaf"])—is a rare, predominantly benign tumor that occurs almost exclusively in the female breast (the left more often than the right).[1, 2] Grossly, the tumor displays characteristics of a large malignant sarcoma, takes on a leaflike appearance when sectioned, and displays epithelial cystlike spaces when viewed histologically.
Because most of these tumors are benign, the term cystosarcoma is potentially misleading. Accordingly, the term currently favored is phyllodes tumor.
Phyllodes tumors generally manifest as larger masses and display rapid growth. (See Presentation.) Overlying skin may be shiny and translucent enough to reveal underlying veins. A very large tumor may erode through skin and present as an external fungating breast mass. More typically, physical findings resemble those of fibroadenoma.
Complete excision, with accurate histologic examination and continued follow-up care, is the best way of treating phyllodes tumors. (See Treatment.) In most cases, wide local excision is indicated, with a rim of normal tissue included. If a satisfactory cosmetic result cannot be achieved with segmental excision, total mastectomy (with or without reconstruction) is an alternative; more radical procedures generally are not warranted. There is no proven role for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
Phyllodes tumor is the most commonly occurring nonepithelial neoplasm of the breast, though it represents only about 1% of tumors in the breast.[3] It has a smooth, sharply demarcated texture and typically is freely movable. It is a relatively large tumor, with an average size of 5 cm (though lesions larger than 30 cm have been reported). The etiology is unknown.
Because of limited data, the relative percentages of benign and malignant phyllodes tumors have not been well defined. Reports have suggested, however, that about 85-90% of phyllodes tumors are benign and that approximately 10-15% are malignant.[4]
Although benign phyllodes tumors do not metastasize, they have a tendency to grow aggressively and can recur locally.[3] Like other sarcomas, malignant phyllodes tumors metastasize hematogenously. Unfortunately, the pathologic appearance of a phyllodes tumor does not always predict the neoplasm's clinical behavior; in some cases, therefore, there is a degree of uncertainty about the lesion's classification.
The characteristics of a malignant phyllodes tumor include the following[5] :
Although most phyllodes tumors are benign, it is nonetheless important not to underestimate the potential of these lesions for malignancy. Moreover, some juvenile fibroadenomas in teenagers can look like phyllodes tumors on histologic examination; however, they behave in a benign fashion similar to that of other fibroadenomas. The difficulty of distinguishing among fibroadenomas, benign phyllodes tumors, and malignant phyllodes tumors may be vexing for even the most experienced pathologist.[7]
Phyllodes tumors occur almost exclusively in females, though rare cases have been reported in males. The tumors can develop in people of any age; however, the median age is the fifth decade of life.
If a phyllodes tumor is benign, the long-term prognosis is excellent after adequate local excision. However, the possibility for local recurrence after excision always exists, particularly with lesions that display malignant histology.[8, 9, 10] If the tumor recurs locally after excision, further local excision or total mastectomy is typically curative. Metastatic disease is typically observed in the lung, mediastinum, and skeleton.[5]
A study (N = 182) from the British Columbia Cancer Agency analyzed local recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with newly diagnosed benign (n = 83), borderline (n = 50), or malignant (n = 49) phyllodes tumors who were followed for a median of 65 months (range, 0.5-197 mo).[11] Overall, 8.7% experienced local recurrence, 4.4% distant metastasis, and 3.8% cause-specific death. With respect to individual subgroups, 5-year outcomes for women with benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors were as follows:
The 5-year local recurrence rates were 8% for women with negative margins, 6% for those with close margins, and 37% for those with positive margins.[11] The corresponding rates for intermediate, pushing, and infiltrative borders were 6%, 6%, and 33%, respectively. Positive margins and infiltrative tumor borders were significantly associated with increased local recurrence.
In a study (N = 795) using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, Chen et al investigated long-term (median follow-up, 126 mo) survival after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy in patients with with T1-2/N0 stage malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast.[12] BCS was found to provide benefits over mastectomy with respect to both overall survival (89.2% vs 81%) and breast cancer–specific survival (95.8% vs 90.1%).
As for all breast neoplasms, self-examination remains the most important initial detection mechanism for phyllodes tumors. Appropriate teaching of this procedure is vital for early detection of all breast neoplasms.
For patient education information, see the Women's Health Center and the Cancer Center, as well as Breast Cancer and Breast Self-Exam.
Phyllodes tumors generally manifest as larger masses and display rapid growth. A small mass may rapidly increase in size in the few weeks before the patient seeks medical attention. Tumors rarely involve the nipple-areola complex or ulcerate to the skin. Patients with metastases may present with such symptoms as dyspnea, fatigue, and bone pain.
A firm, mobile, well-circumscribed, nontender breast mass is appreciated. Curiously, phyllodes tumors tend to involve the left breast more commonly than the right. Overlying skin may display a shiny appearance and be translucent enough to reveal underlying breast veins. A very large phyllodes tumor may erode through overlying skin and present as an external fungating breast mass.[13] More typically, physical findings (ie, the occurrence of mobile masses with distinct borders) are similar to those of fibroadenoma.[7]
No specific hematologic tumor markers or other blood tests have been established as reliable means of diagnosing phyllodes tumors, though expression of biologic markers has been shown to discriminate between different grades of tumor.[14, 15] The immunohistochemical expression of CD10 can predict the occurrence of distant metastasis.[16] It has been suggested that stromal Ki67 expression may prove to be a useful marker for distinguishing benign phyllodes tumor of the breast from fibroadenoma.[17]
A study investigating a malignant phyllodes tumor with whole genomic and proteomic analysis revealed chromosome mutations, amplifications, and deletions.[18] Further exploration of the biology of phyllodes tumor may lead to the development of targeted treatments.
Although mammography and ultrasonography (US) generally are important in the diagnosis of breast lesions, they have not been reliable in differentiating benign phyllodes tumors from malignant phyllodes tumors or from fibroadenomas. (The phyllodes tumor’s mammographic appearance, as a round density with smooth borders, is similar to that of fibroadenoma.) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been well studied in this setting.[19] Thus, findings on imaging studies have not been definitively diagnostic of phyllodes tumors.[20]
A retrospective study by Kawashima et al suggested that intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI could differentiate phyllodes tumors from fibroadenomas by comparing the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.[21] The study included seven fibroadenomas and 15 phyllodes tumors (10 benign, four borderline, and one malignant). The authors found that on IVIM MRI, the ADC was higher in borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors than in fibroadenomas, whereas the opposite was true for the perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*).
A study by Niu et al suggested that the application of artificial intelligence to quantitative analysis of data from US could improve the ability to distinguish between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma.[22] A study by Shi et al came to similar conclusions.[23]
Open excisional breast biopsy for smaller lesions and incisional biopsy for large lesions are the definitive methods for diagnosing phyllodes tumors. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for cytologic examination usually is inadequate for the diagnosis of phyllodes tumors. Core biopsy is more reliable,[24, 25] but sampling errors may still occur, and it may still be difficult to distinguish the lesion from a fibroadenoma.
All phyllodes tumors contain a stromal component that can vary significantly in histologic appearance from one lesion to another.[16] In general, benign phyllodes tumors demonstrate a markedly increased number of regular fusiform fibroblasts in the stroma. Occasionally, highly anaplastic cells with myxoid changes are observed. A high degree of cellular atypia,[26] with increased stromal cellularity and an increased mitotic count, is almost always observed in malignant phyllodes tumors.
Ultrastructurally, in both benign and malignant forms of phyllodes tumors, nucleoli may reveal a coarsely meshed nucleolonema and abundant cisternae in the endoplasmic reticulum.
A small (N = 12) single-institution retrospective study by Johnson et al reported disproportionate rates of aggressive histopathologic features among Black women with phyllodes tumor as compared with non-Black women.[27]
The World Health Organization (WHO) divided phyllodes tumors into the following three categories[28] :
In a retrospective multicentric cohort study that included 230 patients who underwent breast surgery for grade 1 (benign; n = 144), 2 (borderline; n = 60) or 3 (malignant; n = 26) phyllodes tumor,[29] Adam et al concluded that the surgical margin should be at least 5 mm regardless of tumor grade. On the basis of a finding that moderate-to-severe nuclear stromal pleomorphism identified a grade 1 subgroup with a higher rate of recurrence, they suggested that the WHO classification could be revised by introducing consideration of nuclear stromal pleomorphism.
Complete excision, with accurate histologic examination and continued follow-up care, is the best way of treating phyllodes tumors. A general surgery specialist should be consulted.
In most cases, wide local excision is indicated, with a rim of normal tissue included.[30, 31, 8] No absolute rules regarding margin size have been established.[32] However, a 2-cm margin for small (< 5 cm) tumors and a 5-cm margin for large (>5 cm) tumors have been advocated.
Guidelines on benign breast tumors from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF) recommended surgical resection with clear margins for grade 1 (benign) phyllodes tumors and resection with 10-mm margins for grade 2 (borderline) phyllodes tumors.[33]
The lesion should not be "shelled out," as might be done with a fibroadenoma, or the recurrence rate will be unacceptably high.[6]
If the tumor-to-breast ratio is sufficiently high to preclude a satisfactory cosmetic result with segmental excision, total mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, is an alternative. More radical procedures generally are not warranted.[31]
Axillary lymph node dissection should be performed only for clinically suspicious nodes. However, virtually all of these nodes are reactive and do not contain malignant cells.[34] In an international cross-sectional survey addressing clinical practices in the management of phyllodes tumors of the breast, the vast majority of the respondents (surgeons and oncologists) indicated that they did not consider axillary surgery.[35]
There is no proven role for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the treatment of phyllodes tumors. Response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy for recurrences and metastases has been poor, and no success with hormonal manipulation has been documented.
Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors, like most surgical procedures of the breast, may have the following complications:
Although specific guidelines regarding follow-up care for phyllodes tumors are limited because of the rarity of these lesions, regular long-term follow-up care should be performed to detect possible local recurrences.
An initial visit 1-2 weeks after surgery to detect any initial complications should be followed by periodic visits as determined by the patient's surgeon. A reasonable schedule might be physical examinations every 6 months and mammograms yearly for at least 5 years. Patients should be carefully observed for any possible recurrence.