Moraxella catarrhalis Infection

Back

Background

Moraxella catarrhalis is a gram-negative, aerobic, oxidase-positive diplococcus that was first described in 1896. The organism has also been known as Micrococcus catarrhalis, Neisseria catarrhalis, and Branhamella catarrhalis; currently, it is considered to belong to the subgenus Branhamella of the genus Moraxella. For most of the 20th century, M catarrhalis was considered a saprophyte of the upper respiratory tract that was associated with no significant pathogenic consequences.

Various diagnostic studies and procedures may be warranted, depending on the site of the infection and underlying conditions. Confirmation of the diagnosis of M catarrhalis infection is based on culture. Any of a number of antimicrobial drugs may be used to treat M catarrhalis infection, depending on the need for use of oral or parenteral medication, the age of the patient, any underlying conditions present, the sensitivity of the organism, and the desired spectrum of coverage.

Pathophysiology and Etiology

Studies have shown that M catarrhalis colonizes the upper respiratory tract in 28-100% of humans in the first year of life. In adults, the colonization rate is 1-10.4%. Colonization appears to be an ongoing process with an elimination-colonization turnover of various strains. Transmission is believed to be due to direct contact with contaminated secretions by droplets.

The endotoxin of M catarrhalis, a lipopolysaccharide similar to those found in Neisseria species, may play a role in the disease process. Some strains of M catarrhalis have pili or fimbriae, which may facilitate adherence to the respiratory epithelium. Some strains produce a protein that confers resistance to complement by interfering with the formation of the membrane attack complex. M catarrhalis also expresses specific proteins for iron uptake that act as receptors for transferrin and lactoferrin.

M catarrhalis has been shown to have increased cell adhesion and proinflammatory responses when cold shock (26°C for 3 hours) occurs. Physiologically, this may occur with prolonged exposure to cold air temperatures, resulting in coldlike symptoms.[1]

Humoral responses against M catarrhalis appear to be age-dependent, with the titer of immunoglobulin G (IgG) gradually increasing in children. Antibody responses to outer-membrane proteins have been obtained, predominantly in the IgG3 subclass.

Although the commensal status of M catarrhalis in the nasopharynx is still accepted, the organism is a common cause of otitis media and sinusitis and an occasional cause of laryngitis. M catarrhalis causes bronchitis and pneumonia in children and adults with underlying chronic lung disease and is occasionally a cause of bacteremia and meningitis, especially in immunocompromised persons. Bacteremia can be complicated by local infections, such as osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. M catarrhalis is also associated with nosocomial infections.

Epidemiology

United States statistics

M catarrhalis is the third most common cause of otitis media and sinusitis in children (after Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae). M catarrhalis is estimated to be responsible for 3-4 million cases of otitis media annually, with an associated health care cost (direct and indirect) of $2 billion each year.

M catarrhalis infections may occur at any age. Although colonization is more common in children, only a small percentage of positive cultures findings have clinical significance in the pediatric population. In one study, 9% of cultures positive for M catarrhalis in children younger than 5 years and 33% of isolates from children aged 6-10 years were found to be clinically significant. However, all cultures positive for M catarrhalis had clinical importance in adults.

In one study involving adult patients, the male-to-female ratio was 1.6:1.

Prognosis

The prognosis of M catarrhalis infection is poor in hospitalized patients with underlying conditions, especially the following:

The most significant infections caused by M catarrhalis are upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) such as otitis media and sinusitis in children and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in adults. Infections with M catarrhalis in adults are more common if underlying conditions are present, especially if the patient is elderly. In a study of 42 cases of pneumonia with M catarrhalis isolated as the single agent in sputum cultures, the mortality rate attributable to the underlying problems within 3 months of pneumonia was 45%.[2]

History and Physical Examination

The history typically suggests the type of infection present (eg, upper respiratory tract infection [URTI], lower respiratory tract infection [LRTI], bacteremia, or endocarditis). Physical findings in M catarrhalis infections are similar to findings of infections with other organisms in the same location.

Common cold

In 29% of common-cold episodes due to bacterial pathogens (including M catarrhalis), affected children continued to be symptomatic 10 days after the first appearance of symptoms.[3]

Otitis media

A clinical history of acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion with symptoms includes otalgia, fever, and hearing loss. Otitis media is a very common condition, especially in children. Approximately 70% of children experience at least 1 episode of otitis media during childhood. M catarrhalis has been isolated in 3-17.3% of middle ear exudates in children with otitis media.[4, 5]

Sinusitis

In a patient with sinusitis, the clinical history commonly includes headache, pain in the maxillary or frontal area, fever, and cough. Young children present with persistent nasal discharge (lasting longer than 2 weeks) and cough, especially at night. M catarrhalis has been isolated in 22% of maxillary sinus aspirates in children as a single pathogen and in 72% of aspirates in combination with other organisms (eg, S pneumoniae or H influenzae).[6]

Lower respiratory tract infection

In adult patients who have a history of conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumoconiosis, asthma, malignancies, or immunosuppression and who show findings characteristic of bronchitis or pneumonia or exacerbations of their underlying condition, M catarrhalis infection is a possibility. M catarrhalis LRTI is also associated with smoking. M catarrhalis is isolated from sputum and transtracheal aspirate specimens at rates of 0.2-8.1%, accompanied by H influenzae and/or S pneumoniae in more than 30% of cases.[7, 8, 9, 10]

In children, LRTIs have been associated with a history of recent respiratory syncytial virus or cytomegalovirus infection or with more debilitating conditions, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, ventricular septal defect, leukemia, Arnold-Chiari syndrome, prematurity, or HIV infection.[11, 12]

Nosocomial infections

Outbreaks of nosocomial infections with M catarrhalis have been reported, mostly involving pulmonary units or pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Bacteremia

In 46% of patients with M catarrhalis bacteremia, no primary site of infection is found. Bacteremia is rare with M catarrhalis community-acquired pneumonia.[13] The following conditions have been found to predispose to M catarrhalis bacteremia:

Endocarditis and other local infections

M catarrhalis endocarditis has been described in patients with a history of valvular conditions or prostheses, as well as in patients who were previously healthy. It has also been described as a complication of balloon angioplasty.[14, 15] M catarrhalis has been identified as a pathogen in cleft palate repairs (resulting in a higher fistula rate).[16] Sporadic cases of other infections with M catarrhalis include the following:

Complications

Complications of M catarrhalis infection may include the following:

Laboratory Studies

A complete blood count (CBC) should be obtained. An increased white blood cell (WBC) count with neutrophilia may be present.

Gram-negative diplococci are found on Gram staining of cultures. Strict adherence to the staining protocol is required. The accuracy of Gram staining for isolation of Neisseria or Moraxella species has been reported to agree perfectly with identification by culture.[19]

Confirmation of the diagnosis of M catarrhalis infection is based on isolation of the organism in culture. Cultures can be taken from middle ear effusion, the nasopharynx, sputum, sinus aspirates, transtracheal or transbronchial aspirates, blood, peritoneal fluid, wounds, or urine. Colonies are approximately 0.2 cm in diameter, opaque, and nonhemolytic after incubation on chocolate or blood agar for 48 hours. Characteristically, colonies can be pushed along the surface of the agar like a hockey puck.

With standard methods of identification, M catarrhalis can be differentiated from Neisseria species by not using sucrose, glucose, maltose, and lactose. Because Neisseria cinerea exhibits the same reaction pattern, the Superoxyl test must be added. For definitive identification, deoxyribonuclease (DNase) and nitrate reduction tests are performed; M catarrhalis produces DNase and reduces nitrate and nitrite levels.

Several rapid confirmatory tests are available to identify M catarrhalis, and they are all based on the ability of M catarrhalis to hydrolyze tributyrin. This provides immediate identification and separation from human Neisseria species, which do not hydrolyze tributyrin.

Serologic tests for infections with M catarrhalis are not widely used; cross-reactivity with Neisseria species in the detection of complement fixation antibodies by immunoelectrophoresis has been demonstrated. Serum antibodies to whole-cell proteins, to lipo-oligosaccharides, and to outer-membrane antigens have proved useful in the diagnosis of M catarrhalis infection. Other laboratory studies may be needed, depending on the site of infection and underlying conditions.

Imaging Studies

Imaging studies (eg, plain radiography or computed tomography [CT]) may be needed, depending on the site of infection.

Paranasal sinus radiography or CT scanning may be helpful. Chest radiography is often performed. If peritonitis is a possibility, abdominal radiography using a 3-way view is indicated.

Approach Considerations

Medical management of M catarrhalis infection depends on the infection site, age of the patient, underlying condition(s), and severity of the disease.

Consultation with an ear, nose, and throat specialist may be indicated in recurrent cases of otitis or sinusitis. Consultation with an infectious disease specialist is recommended for infections that do not respond to antibiotic treatment, infections in patients with underlying debilitating conditions, systemic infections with M catarrhalis, or infections in unusual locations.

Follow-up care with the patient’s primary care physician is highly recommended. Worsening symptoms warrant a return visit to the primary care physician.

Pharmacologic Therapy

Any of a number of antimicrobial drugs may be used to treat M catarrhalis infection, depending on the need for use of oral or parenteral medication, the age of the patient, any underlying conditions present, the sensitivity of the organism, and the desired spectrum of coverage.

Approximately 95% of M catarrhalis strains isolated in the United States produce beta-lactamase. Antibiotics such as penicillin, amoxicillin, and ampicillin are only effective against strains that do not produce beta-lactamase.

Amoxicillin-clavulanate, second- and third-generation oral cephalosporins, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) are the most recommended agents. Alternatively, azithromycin or clarithromycin can be used. More than 90% of M catarrhalis strains have been shown to resist amoxicillin, and these rates vary by region.[20]

In one study, topical use of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone for treatment of acute otitis media with otorrhea via tympanostomy tubes was found to have similar efficacy to that of topical use of ofloxacin in M catarrhalis infections.[21]

In another study, treatment with oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days was found to be comparable with a 10-day regimen of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.[22]

Telithromycin, a ketolide derivative of erythromycin A, demonstrated good in vitro activity against M catarrhalis in a study of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.[23] However, severe liver disease associated with telithromycin use has been reported.[24] Note that telithromycin is not indicated for use in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Moxifloxacin, a quinolone, was found to be an effective treatment of M catarrhalis– associated community-acquired pneumonia in a dosage of 400 mg/day.[25]

Prevention

Universal precautions, good hand-washing technique, and sterilization of instruments and tubes used in intubations, aspiration, or invasive procedures may reduce or prevent the nosocomial infections caused by M catarrhalis. Cessation of smoking and prevention of passive smoking may reduce M catarrhalis infections. Good general health habits (eg, proper rest, exercise, and diet) are helpful as well.

Research is under way to create a vaccine to prevent M catarrhalis infections.[26, 27] It is projected that 4.2 million episodes of otitis media would be prevented by a combined pneumococcal-nontypeable H influenzaeMoraxella vaccine.[28]

Medication Summary

Various antimicrobial drugs may be used to treat Moraxella catarrhalis infection. Therapy should cover likely pathogens in the context of this clinical setting. Nearly all M catarrhalis strains produce beta-lactamase.

Erythromycin (E.E.S., Erythrocin, Ery-Tab)

Clinical Context:  Erythromycin inhibits bacterial growth, possibly by blocking dissociation of peptidyl tRNA from ribosomes, causing RNA-dependent protein synthesis to arrest. It has the added advantage of exerting good anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) Erythromycin is used for treatment of staphylococcal and streptococcal infections.

The recommended dosing schedule of erythromycin may result in gastrointestinal (GI) upset, warranting a switch to an alternative macrolide or to thrice-daily dosing. This agent covers most potential etiologic agents, including Mycoplasma species.

Although a 10-day treatment course seems to be standard, treating until the patient has been afebrile for 3-5 days seems a more rational approach. In children, age, weight, and severity of infection determine proper dosage. When twice-daily dosing is desired, half of the total daily dose may be taken every 12 hours. For more severe infections, double the dose.

Azithromycin (Zithromax, Zmax)

Clinical Context:  Azithromycin treats mild-to-moderate microbial infections.

Clarithromycin (Biaxin, Biaxin XL)

Clinical Context:  Clarithromycin inhibits bacterial growth, possibly by blocking dissociation of peptidyl tRNA from ribosomes, causing RNA-dependent protein synthesis to arrest.

Cefaclor

Clinical Context:  Cefaclor is a second-generation cephalosporin indicated for infections caused by susceptible gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods. Determine the proper dosage and route on the basis of the condition of the patient, severity of the infection, and susceptibility of the causative organism.

Cefprozil

Clinical Context:  Cefprozil binds to 1 or more of the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), thereby inhibiting cell-wall synthesis and resulting in bactericidal activity.

Cefuroxime (Ceftin, Zinacef)

Clinical Context:  Cefuroxime is a second-generation cephalosporin that maintains the gram-positive activity of the first-generation cephalosporins while adding activity against Proteus mirabilis, H influenzae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and M catarrhalis. The condition of the patient, severity of the infection, and susceptibility of the microorganism determine the proper dose.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim, Bactrim DS, Septra DS)

Clinical Context:  TMP-SMX inhibits bacterial growth by inhibiting synthesis of dihydrofolic acid. Its antibacterial activity includes common urinary tract pathogens, except Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Cefotaxime (Claforan)

Clinical Context:  Cefotaxime is used for treatment of bloodstream infection and gynecologic infections caused by susceptible organisms. It arrests bacterial cell wall synthesis, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth. It is a third-generation cephalosporin with a gram-negative spectrum; it is less efficacious against gram-positive organisms.

Ceftriaxone (Rocephin)

Clinical Context:  Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin with broad-spectrum gram-negative activity; it has lower efficacy against gram-positive organisms and higher efficacy against resistant organisms. It arrests bacterial growth by binding to 1 or more PBPs.

Ceftazidime (Tazicef, Fortaz)

Clinical Context:  Ceftazidime is a third-generation cephalosporin with broad-spectrum gram-negative activity; it has lower efficacy against gram-positive organisms and higher efficacy against resistant organisms. Ceftazidime arrests bacterial growth by binding to 1 or more PBPs. Its gram-negative spectrum includes M catarrhalis. Dosage depends on the severity of infection and the susceptibility of the organism.

Ciprofloxacin (Cipro)

Clinical Context:  Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone with activity against most gram-negative organisms but no activity against anaerobes. It inhibits bacterial DNA synthesis and consequently growth.

Levofloxacin (Levaquin)

Clinical Context:  Levofloxacin is used for pseudomonal infections and infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms.

Moxifloxacin (Avelox)

Clinical Context:  Moxifloxacin inhibits the A subunits of DNA gyrase, resulting in inhibition of bacterial DNA replication and transcription.

Class Summary

Amoxicillin-clavulanate, second- and third-generation oral cephalosporins, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) are the most recommended agents. Alternatively, azithromycin or clarithromycin can be used. All other agents listed below are also effective.

What is Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What is the pathophysiology of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What is the US prevalence of Moraxella catarrhalis infections?What is the prognosis of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What are the most significant infections caused by Moraxella catarrhalis?Which clinical findings are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What is the prevalence of common colds caused by Moraxella catarrhalis infection?Which clinical history finds are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis-caused otitis media?Which clinical history finds are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis-caused sinusitis?Which clinical history finds are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis-caused lower respiratory tract infection?Which clinical history finds are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis-caused nosocomial infections?Which clinical history finds are characteristic of Moraxella catarrhalis-caused bacteremia?What other infections may occur with Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What are the possible complications of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnosis of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What are the differential diagnoses for Moraxella catarrhalis Infection?What is the role of lab testing in the workup of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What is the role of imaging studies in the workup of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?How is treatment selection determined for Moraxella catarrhalis infection?Which specialist consultations may be beneficial to patients with Moraxella catarrhalis infection?What is the role of pharmacologic therapy in the treatment of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?How are Moraxella catarrhalis infections prevented?Which medications are used in the treatment of Moraxella catarrhalis infection?Which medications in the drug class Antimicrobials are used in the treatment of Moraxella catarrhalis Infection?

Author

Michael Constantinescu, MD, Staff Pathologist, Overton Brooks Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

James D Cotelingam, MBBS, MD, Head of Hematopathology, Director of Clinical Laboratories, Professor, Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joseph A Bocchini, Jr, MD, Medical Director of Children's Hospital; Member, Pediatric Infectious Disease Section, Chairman, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ronald Silberman, PhD, Director of Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Louisiana State University Hospital; Professor, Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD, David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, London

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Joseph F John Jr, MD, FACP, FIDSA, FSHEA Clinical Professor of Medicine, Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine; Associate Chief of Staff for Education, Ralph H Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Maria D Mileno, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Maria D Mileno, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Society of Travel Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References

  1. Aebi C. Moraxella catarrhalis - pathogen or commensal?. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011. 697:107-16. [View Abstract]
  2. Wright PW, Wallace RJ Jr, Shepherd JR. A descriptive study of 42 cases of Branhamella catarrhalis pneumonia. Am J Med. 1990 May 14. 88(5A):2S-8S. [View Abstract]
  3. Pappas DE, Hendley JO, Hayden FG, Winther B. Symptom profile of common colds in school-aged children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Jan. 27(1):8-11. [View Abstract]
  4. Gehanno P, Panajotopoulos A, Barry B, Nguyen L, Levy D, Bingen E, et al. Microbiology of otitis media in the Paris, France, area from 1987 to 1997. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Jun. 20(6):570-3. [View Abstract]
  5. Li WC, Chiu NC, Hsu CH, Lee KS, Hwang HK, Huang FY. Pathogens in the middle ear effusion of children with persistent otitis media: implications of drug resistance and complications. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2001 Sep. 34(3):190-4. [View Abstract]
  6. Wald ER. Microbiology of acute and chronic sinusitis in children and adults. Am J Med Sci. 1998 Jul. 316(1):13-20. [View Abstract]
  7. Hunter MH, King DE. COPD: management of acute exacerbations and chronic stable disease. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Aug 15. 64(4):603-12. [View Abstract]
  8. Lieberman D, Lieberman D, Ben-Yaakov M, et al. Infectious etiologies in acute exacerbation of COPD. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Jul. 40(3):95-102. [View Abstract]
  9. Sethi S, Murphy TF. Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr. 14(2):336-63. [View Abstract]
  10. Soler N, Torres A, Ewig S, et al. Bronchial microbial patterns in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 May. 157(5 Pt 1):1498-505. [View Abstract]
  11. Aronovitz G. Treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections: clinical trials with cefprozil. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Aug. 17(8 Suppl):S83-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Manfredi R, Nanetti A, Valentini R, Chiodo F. Moraxella catarrhalis pneumonia during HIV disease. J Chemother. 2000 Oct. 12(5):406-11. [View Abstract]
  13. Thórsson B, Haraldsdóttir V, Kristjánsson M. Moraxella catarrhalis bacteraemia. A report on 3 cases and a review of the literature. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998. 30(2):105-9. [View Abstract]
  14. Neumayer U, Schmidt HK, Mellwig KP, Kleikamp G. Moraxella catarrhalis endocarditis: report of a case and literature review. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 Jan. 8(1):114-7. [View Abstract]
  15. Stefanou J, Agelopoulou AV, Sipsas NV, Smilakou N, Avlami A. Moraxella catarrhalis endocarditis: case report and review of the literature. Scand J Infect Dis. 2000. 32(2):217-8. [View Abstract]
  16. Narinesingh SP, Whitby DJ, Davenport PJ. Moraxella catarrhalis: an unrecognized pathogen of the oral cavity?. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jul. 48(4):462-4. [View Abstract]
  17. Tritton D, Watts T, Sieratzki JS. Peri-orbital cellulitis and sepsis by Branhamella catarrhalis. Eur J Pediatr. 1998 Jul. 157(7):611-2. [View Abstract]
  18. Abdolrasouli A, Amin A, Baharsefat M, Roushan A, Hemmati Y. Moraxella catarrhalis associated with acute urethritis imitating gonorrhoea acquired by oral-genital contact. Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Aug. 18(8):579-80. [View Abstract]
  19. Uehara Y, Yagoshi M, Tanimichi Y, Yamada H, Shimoguchi K, Yamamoto S, et al. Impact of reporting gram stain results from blood culture bottles on the selection of antimicrobial agents. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jul. 132(1):18-25. [View Abstract]
  20. Hwang PH. A 51-year-old woman with acute onset of facial pressure, rhinorrhea, and tooth pain: review of acute rhinosinusitis. JAMA. 2009 May 6. 301(17):1798-807. [View Abstract]
  21. Roland PS, Kreisler LS, Reese B, et al. Topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension is superior to ofloxacin otic solution in the treatment of children with acute otitis media with otorrhea through tympanostomy tubes. Pediatrics. 2004 Jan. 113(1 Pt 1):e40-6. [View Abstract]
  22. Swanson RN, Lainez-Ventosilla A, De Salvo MC, Dunne MW, Amsden GW. Once-daily azithromycin for 3 days compared with clarithromycin for 10 days for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. Treat Respir Med. 2005. 4(1):31-9. [View Abstract]
  23. Sethi S, Anzueto A, Farrell DJ. Antibiotic activity of telithromycin and comparators against bacterial pathogens isolated from 3,043 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2005 Mar 8. 4:5. [View Abstract]
  24. Dore DD, DiBello JR, Lapane KL. Telithromycin use and spontaneous reports of hepatotoxicity. Drug Saf. 2007. 30(8):697-703. [View Abstract]
  25. Yoshida K, Okimoto N, Kishimoto M, et al. Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia based on pharmacokinetic analysis. J Infect Chemother. 2011 Oct. 17(5):678-85. [View Abstract]
  26. Ren D, Yu S, Gao S, et al. Mutant lipooligosaccharide-based conjugate vaccine demonstrates a broad-spectrum effectiveness against Moraxella catarrhalis. Vaccine. 2011 Jun 6. 29(25):4210-7. [View Abstract]
  27. Yang M, Johnson A, Murphy TF. Characterization and evaluation of the Moraxella catarrhalis oligopeptide permease A as a mucosal vaccine antigen. Infect Immun. 2011 Feb. 79(2):846-57. [View Abstract]
  28. O'Brien MA, Prosser LA, Paradise JL, et al. New vaccines against otitis media: projected benefits and cost-effectiveness. Pediatrics. 2009 Jun. 123(6):1452-63. [View Abstract]
  29. Shaikh SB, Ahmed Z, Arsalan SA, Shafiq S. Prevalence and resistance pattern of Moraxella catarrhalis in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Infect Drug Resist. 2015. 8:263-7. [View Abstract]