Trichosporon Infections

Back

Background

Trichosporon are yeast-like anamorphic organisms that belong to the basidiomycetes yeasts.[1]  Trichosporon yeasts are found worldwide, but most commonly in tropical and temperate regions such as South America, the Middle East, India, Southeast Asia, Africa, Europe, Japan, and parts of Southeastern United States.[2]  Trichosporon spp are distributed mainly in soil, decomposing wood, water, foods, beetles, bird droppings, cattle, and bats. They can form part of the oral and gastrointestinal tract and transiently colonize the respiratory tract. They also may colonize the perianal and inguinal skin.[3]

Most Trichosporon spp are saprophytic, however some can be pathogenic and cause both superficial and invasive disease.[3] Historically this organism was known to cause white piedra, which is characterized by soft nodules along the hair shaft. The etiology of this disease was identified as Trichospron ovoides in 1890. Since then, several other species have been described. Trichosporon asahii is the most common species, followed by Trichosporon inkin, Trichosporon faecale, Trichosporon asteroides, and Trichosporon mucoides.[3, 4]  T asahii, T mucoides, andasteroides tend to cause invasive disease. T cutaneum, T ovoides, and T inkin all cause superficial infections of the skin, scalp and hair, and pubic hair, respectively.[3, 4, 5]

Although first identified as a superficial infection of the skin or hair, Trichosporon is an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing invasive disease in immunocompromised patients or those with invasive medical devices. Trichosporon can adhere to polystyrene on medical devices and subsequently form biofilms, hence the association with peritoneal, bladder, and central venous catheters.[4]  Similar to Candida, Trichosporon can form biofilms, which are complex, organized structures consisting of dense microbial communities encased in a self-produced extracellular matrix composed mainly of polysaccharides, extracellular DNA, and secreted proteins.[4, 6, 7]

Invasive Trichosporon infections occur mostly in immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with hematological malignancies or AIDS. Unfortunately, diagnosing and treating invasive trichosporonosis can be challenging, and its global incidence is on the rise.[5]

 

Pathophysiology

Trichosporon species can harmlessly exist as commensals on the skin and in the gastrointestinal tract of healthy individuals, where they are monitored by the immune system and interact with the resident microbiome.[8]  However, changes in the surrounding microenvironment can trigger their pathogenicity and result in clinically signficant disease. The pathophysiology of Trichosporonosis depends on whether the infection is superficial or invasive. 

Superficial infection

The most common superficial Trichosporon infection is known as white piedra (piedra is the Spanish word for “stone”). In this condition, Trichosporin grows beneath the hair cuticle until a stone like nodule is formed which weakens the hair shaft resulting in breakage. Hair texture may be rough or broken as a result. White piedra may be confused with dandruff; however, dandruff appears as white flakes falling from the scalp, whereas white piedra are whitish tan nodules attached to the hair shaft itself.[9, 10]

Invasive infection

In general, invasive infection occurs as three possible syndromes; disseminated disease (the most common invasive disease presentation), invasive disease localized to a major organ (such as the bladder, lungs, or other organ), or an invasive infection that is related to a indwelling catheter. The pathophysiology of invasive Trichosporon infection involves several pathogen virulence factors and host risk factors which may determine which of these three syndromes develop.

Pertinent factors include the following:

Epidemiology

Frequency

Trichosporon infections are rare, even among patients with impaired host defenses.

Overall the number of cases of Trichosporon spp has grown. One systematic review noted a 74% increase in the number of invasive disease due to Trichosporon spp between 2005 to 2015 compared with 1994 to 2004.[5]  Trichsporon spp causes invasive disease and deep-seated infections predominantly in immunocompromised hosts. Immunocompetent hosts usually present with superficial infections of the skin/hair or summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis.[4]

Corticosteroid use, solid tumors, HIV/AIDS, and intravascular devices, including catheters and prosthetic heart valves,[17] are other major risk factors. In one retrospective series, trichosporonosis (including B capitatus infections) developed in only 0.9% of patients with acute leukemia.[18] In another review of yeast bloodstream infection in patients with cancer at a major referral center, Trichosporon was identified in only 8 of 2,984 isolates (0.27%). Hematologic malignancy is the best-described risk factor.[19]

Despite the small number of cases, B capitatus may have a geographic predilection for Europe, with most reported cases arising there (especially in Spain and Italy).

T asahii may be a more common cause of breakthrough fungemia in neutropenic patients from Japan than other regions,[20] and this organism is the cause of summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis, a condition reported exclusively in Japan.[21, 22]

Mortality/Morbidity

The mortality rate of acute disseminated trichosporonosis previously has been documented at between 50% and 80% in most case series.[23, 24, 25]  Other series have reported mortality rates of 40-50% in patients with invasive disease.[26, 27]

Benelli et al reviewed a series of 10 cases with severe COVID-19 who also developed invasive Trichosporonosis. Most of these cases were found in South America and the Middle East, and all required systemic steroids and mechanical ventilation. Outcomes in this group were fairly poor; all but one patient died.[28]

Sex

Trichosporonosis is much more common in males, with a 2:1 male-to-female predominance reported in multiple series.[24, 29]

Age

Invasive disease has been noted among all age groups, but most commonly adults between ages 40 to 50 years.[5, 26]

Diseases that confer susceptibility to Trichosporon infections are most prevalent in adults, with a median age of 44 years in one report.[24]

A small number of neonatal and pediatric invasive Trichosporon infections have been reported, including nosocomial outbreaks within neonatal intensive care units.[5, 30, 31]

History

The typical patient with trichosporonosis presents with neutropenia and fever, usually in the setting of cytotoxic chemotherapy for a hematologic malignancy. Patients with hematologic disease are the most common host for invasive trichosporonosis. These include patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), followed by acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Among these subgroups, invasive disease has been noted in those with neutropenia, graft versus host disease, and during post stem cell transplant and pre-engraftment period. Patients with solid organ tumor, transplant and autoimmune disorders are the next most common host. Those with renal transplant and lung cancer tend to be affected more commonly than others.[6, 26, 32, 33]  Having been diagnosed with white piedra is not a significant risk factor.[32]

A history of corticosteroid use is common, often as part of a chemotherapeutic regimen for leukemia, lymphoma. As in patients with invasive candidiasis, empiric broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy without clinical improvement may be included in the history. Prophylactic antifungal therapy with echinocandins may precede a breakthrough Trichosporon infection.[34]  Recent steroid use for COVID-19 has also been reported in cases of trichosporonosis.[28]

Past medical history may include any of the already discussed medical risk factors including hematologic malignancy, HIV/AIDS, or renal disease resulting in need for a dialysis catheter. Cases have also been reported in patients with hemochromatosis[29] or prosthetic heart valve placement.[17]  Benelli et al reviewed a series of 10 cases with severe COVID-19 who also developed invasive Trichosporonosis. Most of these cases were found in South America and the Middle East, and all required systemic steroids and mechanical ventilation.[28]

Syndromic presentations: Patients with disseminated disease tend to have fungemia. The next most common site of isolation is lungs, followed by skin, a combination of skin and lung. Other sites of involvement that are less common include liver, spleen, prosthetic valves and the central nervous system. Patients with trichosporonosis may have a variable constellation of historical features, depending on the organs involved, and often have fever and chills. 

 

 

 

 

Physical

General: Immunocompromised patients with fungemia or disseminated disease may generally appear ill. Some patients have infection localized to only one organ, and fungemia may not occur in all of these patients.[32]  Localized disease has been described in the lungs, peritoneum,[16]  eye, brain, and stomach.

Eye: Ocular involvement is well-described and occurs in the uveal tissues; chorioretinitis has been described.[29]  

HENT: Lesions may be found along the entire length of the GI tract, usually in the form of erosions or ulcers. Patients with hematologic malignancies may have coexisting mucositis.

Cardiac: Murmurs may be ausculatated if there is endocarditis

Pulmonary: Pulmonary infiltrates are common, occurring in about 25% of patients but with no specific pattern of involvement.[32]  Hypoxemia has been described in association with these lesions. An isolated pulmonary infiltrate may be the only demonstrable manifestation of trichosporonosis in some patients. What proportion of patients have pulmonary physical exam findings is unclear.

Gastrointestinal: Lesions may be found along the entire length of the GI tract, usually in the form of erosions or ulcers. Patients with hematologic malignancies may have coexisting mucositis or perirectal pain. Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis with a PD catheter infection may present with abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and cloudy peritoneal fluid.[16, 33]

Genitourinary: Flank tenderness or hematuria may be present and suggests renal involvement in disseminated disease. Flank pain, azotemia, hematuria, or red blood cell casts may signal renal involvement.[29]

Dermatologic: Cutaneous findings occur in one third of patients with disseminated Trichosporon disease.[42] The most commonly described lesions are nontender erythematous nodules of varying number,[31] which are located mainly on the extremities but also are found on the trunk and face. The lesions may become ulcerated,[42] with an appearance similar to that of ecthyma gangrenosum. Skin involvement often begins as a discrete maculopapular rash and may progress to purpuric or hemorrhagic manifestations.[29]  (The presence of skin lesions may represent a site for biopsy, aiding in the diagnosis.) For patients with a superficial scalp infection (white piedra) this may be confused with dandruff, however, dandruff appears as white flakes falling from the scalp, whereas white piedra are whitish tan nodules attached to the hair shaft itself.[9, 10]

Neurologic: and spondylodiscitis also have been described.[43]

 

 

Causes

Most literature prior to 1995 refers to pathogenic Trichosporon species as T beigelii. Subsequent articles usually describe specific species under the newer nomenclature.

Etiologic agents, in order of reported frequency, include the following:

Trichosporon is a normal colonizer of mucous membranes in the GI and respiratory epithelium, as well as the skin; invasive disease usually requires significant host compromise of both anatomic and neutrophilic defenses.

In nearly all patients, the source of the invasive organism is the host’s flora. Trichosporon is not often isolated from hospital environments, although outbreaks due to contaminated hospital equipment have been reported. Unlikely sources of nosocomial spread, such as infected urinary catheters and aerosolization of the fungus, have been described.[30, 44]

Risk factors include the following:

Approach Considerations

The diagnosis of trichosporonosis usually is confirmed by a positive blood culture result obtained in the evaluation of a febrile (typically neutropenic) patient. Most patients with disseminated disease tend to have fungemia. The next most common site of isolation is lungs, followed by skin, a combination of skin and lung. Other sites of involvement that are less common include liver, spleen, prosthetic valves and the central nervous system.[2, 5, 32]  Ultimately, the appropriate work up should include blood cultures; however, additional testing should be focused based on the presenting syndromic illness.

Invasive trichosporonosis is defined as either proven, probable, or possible per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infection Cooperative Group (EORTC/IFICG) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Mycoses Study Group (NIAID/MSG) guidelines.[3, 48]

Proven disease applies to all patients regardless of immune status. Proven disease requires at least one of the following criteria: (1) histopathologic, cytopathologic, or direct microscopy exam of a sterile site demonstrating yeast; (2) recovery of yeast on culture from a normally sterile site with a clinical or radiologic syndrome of an infectious process; (3) blood cultures positive for yeast; or (4) amplification of fungal DNA by PCR on a tissue sample.

Probable disease criteria are applicable to those with underlying immunocompromise. Probable disease requires the presence of at least 1 host criteria, clinical criteria, and microbiologic criteria (Table 1).[3, 48]

 

Table. Risk Factors for Invasive Trichosporonosis



View Table

See Table

Possible disease is defined by the presence of host and clinical criteria, but without any microbiologic evidence as defined in Table 1.[3]

Laboratory Studies

Important laboratory tests include the following:

Investigational methods of rapid molecular diagnostics, such as DNA-based microarrays,[51] polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and pyrosequencing,[52] are in development but are not widely available for clinical use.[53, 54]

Imaging Studies

Radiologic evaluation should include a chest radiograph and CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. A CT scan of the chest is also frequently useful in the evaluation of the pulmonary infiltrate in the patient population at risk for Trichosporon infection, but confirmation of the diagnosis should rely on a tissue sample or on another useful clinical sample. Depending on the clinical picture, a CT scan or MRI of the brain may be indicated.

Endocarditis rarely is reported[17, 47] but is associated with high mortality rate (82% in a single series). Patients with prosthetic heart valves or persistently positive blood culture results should undergo echocardiography.

Procedures

Bronchoscopy

When pulmonary infiltrates are present, bronchoscopy is a useful means of obtaining samples if the patient can tolerate the procedure. Positive culture results from a bronchial lavage support the diagnosis.[31]

Biopsy

Open-lung biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis because of the large number of viral, bacterial, protozoal, and fungal pathogens that can cause disease in patients with pulmonary infiltrates.

Lesions of the GI tract may be accessible for biopsy and may yield a diagnosis before blood cultures return positive findings.

Skin lesions occur in roughly 10% of patients with disseminated trichosporonosis. Biopsy of suspicious lesions in immunocompromised patients with fever may facilitate early diagnosis.

Liver lesions or other visceral lesions may also require biopsy for diagnosis and optimal management.

Histologic Findings

Histopathology and fungal stain of the tissue are the gold standard for diagnosis. Histopathologic features of Trichosporon spp include pseudohyphae, hyphae. Blastoconidia and arthroconidia can also be found; the presence of these elements along with a urease positive test allows for presumptive identification of Trichosporon.[3, 4] Fungal culture of blood or tissue are well supported for diagnostics and show white or cream-colored colonies with a cerebriform pattern on Saboraud-dextrose agar. Colonies may be dry after 24 to 48 hours.[3]

Grossly, infected tissues may contain micronodules (0.5-1.0 cm), occasionally surrounded by red rims. The GI tract may demonstrate ulceration and erosion associated with hemorrhage and hemorrhagic infarction.[45]

Microscopic examination of a nodule may reveal a necrotic center with fungal elements either in a starburst pattern or more loosely organized. Fungal elements may be observed invading the vasculature. Visualization of blastoconidia, arthroconidia, hyphae, and pseudohyphae in a histologic section supports the diagnosis of invasive Trichosporon infection.[29, 45]  The cellular inflammation surrounding the fungal elements may vary, occasionally associated with hemorrhage. Granulomatous inflammation with multinucleated giant cells has been reported.[55]

Histopathology and fungal cultures should be pursued whenever possible; however results may be delayed and culture may not distinguish colonization from true disease. History and clinical suspicion are of paramount importance in these cases.[3, 4] Considering the limitations of pathology and culture, several biomarkers and molecular testing have come to light..

Other Tests

Molecular methods such as Ribosomal DNA sequencing are reliable and strongly recommended. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) is being increasingly utilized and able to identify at least 10 species of Trichosporon.[2, 3, 4]  Genus or species cannot be inferred from histopathology; direct microscopy is recommended instead.[3]

Glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) is a cell wall component of both Trichosporon and Cryptococcus species. The GXM components of both organisms have structural differences but can cross react with the cryptococcal antigens resulting in a positive test in patients with invasive Trichosporonosis. [4] However, not many studies exploring the sensitivity of this test, therefore it should be used with caution in screening for invasive Trichosporonosis.[4]  Likewise, (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG) has limited utility for screening purposes as per one study that noted around 50% sensitivity in patients with invasive Trichosporonosis.[56]

Approach Considerations

Most data regarding treatment of Trichosporon spp is derived from in-vitro studies and patients with hematologic malignancies. Per both European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) guidelines, voriconazole or posaconazole are recommended as the first line of therapy. Fluconazole is the alternative regimen dependent on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).[3]  

There is some data for use of isavuconazole. Liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate may be used as a second line therapy; overall azoles are preferred over amphotericin B. Combination therapy with Azole-amphotericin B is not recommended as initial regimen, but may be used as salvage therapy. Echinocandins alone have not conferred any therapeutic advantage against Trichosporon and should be avoided. [2, 3]

Medical Care

Azoles

Voriconazole and posaconazole show excellent in vitro activity against Trichosporon.[17, 27, 31, 57] In particular, voriconazole seems to have better in vitro activity than amphotericin B.[27, 58, 59] Indeed, successful clearance of fungemia with voriconazole has been reported when liposomal amphotericin B treatment was failing.[31] Posaconazole is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in patients at high risk because of severe immunosuppression and has activity against Trichosporon, although human clinical data are both limited and mixed in terms of results.[60, 61]  Most azoles can prolong the QT interval. Voriconazole can contribute to hepatocellular injury, visual disturbances (most commonly hallucinations), and photosensitivity.

Voriconazole also has several drug interactions particularly in patients post organ and stem cell transplant.[56]  These drugs are both a substrate and an inhibitor of the cytochrome P-450 system and so can lead to decreased metabolism and increased toxicity of several medications such as calcium-channel blockers, warfarin, rifabutin, phenytoin, tacrolimus and cyclosporin. Posaconazole can also interact with several medications such as rifabutin, rifampin, statins and various immunosuppressive medications.[62, 63]

Amphotericin

High-dose amphotericin B deoxycholate (1-1.5 mg/kg/d) historically has been the most common treatment for invasive trichosporonosis, but many breakthrough cases have occurred on this therapy.[12, 25]  Because of high rates of resistance to amphotericin B[58] and the toxicity of this regimen, alternate therapies are often necessary. Lipid preparations of amphotericin B (eg, liposomal amphotericin B, 5 mg/kg/d) are commonly used in place of amphotericin B deoxycholate, although treatment failures have also been reported with these agents.[23] Bcapitatus infections appear to respond better to amphotericin B than those due to Trichosporon species.[25]  Amphotericin B is classically associated with infusion-related events such as fevers, chills, headaches, nausea, vomiting and nephrotoxicity. Liposomal formulation of amphotericin B can lessen but not completely ameliorate the possibility of these adverse effects. Nephrotoxicity can be prevented by IV fluid administration before infusion of the medication along with avoidance of nephrotoxic medication such as diuretics. Most patients develop tolerance to infusion-related side effects; but supportive measures such as diphenhydramine and acetaminophen can be used if necessary.[62, 63]

Echinocandins

Lone echinocandin should be avoided. The echinocandins caspofungin and micafungin have poor in vitro activity against Trichosporon when used alone.[20] One report describes successful treatment of T inkin peritoneal catheter–associated peritonitis using caspofungin monotherapy.[16] However, cases of breakthrough T asahii infections have been reported in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving micafungin[20] and caspofungin[46] for empiric treatment of neutropenic fever. Combination therapy with caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B may be effective,[23] and micafungin and amphotericin B appear synergistic against Trichosporon in vitro. One in vivo murine model of trichosporonosis showed a significant reduction in fungal burden in multiple infected organ systems when amphotericin B was combined with micafungin. 

Combination therapy

Combination therapy should be the cornerstone of treatment for trichosporonosis. The combination of high-dose amphotericin B (deoxycholate or liposomal) with either or both 5-flucytosine or voriconazole is commonly prescribed, although failure rates remain high. Amphotericin B plus an echinocandin is a potentially promising regimen, and synergy has been suggested in vitro[64] and in a murine model,[65] with a small number of successful reports of salvage therapy in the current literature.[66, 67]

Source Control and Other Considerations

Regardless of the therapeutic options, patients’ clinical responses may not be optimal until they recover from their predisposing immunocompromised states. Possible strategies include the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with neutropenia[45] and the reduction of glucocorticoid doses as much as possible in patients receiving these agents. Persistence of positive blood culture findings on amphotericin B monotherapy suggests resistance, and modification of the regimen is indicated. Catheter-associated infections, such as peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, generally require removal of the catheter.

In patients who do not respond to high-dose amphotericin B, an azole or flucytosine (5-FC) should be added. Unfortunately, all of these therapies have significant failure rates in patients with neutropenia. levels of 5-FC must be carefully monitored. Do not use 5-FC if levels cannot be measured expeditiously. Liposomal amphotericin has been successfully used in trichosporonosis but may not necessarily offer greater efficacy over standard therapy. Miconazole has significant in vitro activity; however, this does not translate to useful in vivo results, and it should not be used.

Fungemia and superficial infections without organ involvement should be treated for 2 weeks. Whereas with organ involvement 4 to 6 weeks of therapy are recommended, along with source control strategies such as CVAD removal and valve replacement, and removal of central venous catheter. Patients may also be treated until radiologic resolution.[3]

Consultations

Patients with trichosporonosis are often critically ill, complicated, and immunosuppressed.Infectious diseases consultation is paramount, preferibily with a transplant infectious diseases specialist if possible.

Due to the severity of disseminated fungal infections infection and their frequent underlying illnesses, a critical care unit admission is warranted in most cases.

Consultation with an ophthalmologist is generally advised for diagnostic purposes and to evaluate for fungal retinitis.

Because of the many organ systems involved, input from a number of other specialists may be required. Pulmonologists, intensivists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, and general surgeons commonly assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with trichosporonosis.

Global guideline for diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections by ECMM, ISHAM, and ASM

A global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections by the European Confederation for Medical Mycology (ECMM) in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) was published in 2021.[3] Recommendations for Trichosporon infection are summarized below[3] :

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to eradicate the infection, to reduce morbidity, and to prevent complications. In general, empiric monotherapy should be avoided without specific testing of fungal sensitivity to available drugs.

Amphotericin B (Amphocin, Fungizone)

Clinical Context:  Amphoteric polyene antifungal with activity against many fungal pathogens. Administered in solution only and is well known for a variety of toxic side effects. May be injected intrathecally or into a joint space, or it may be used as an irrigant, although it is usually administered IV. Dose should be adjusted for the indication. For trichosporonosis, high doses are required. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B (see below) are generally preferred, however.

Amphotericin B, liposomal (AmBisome)

Clinical Context:  Lipid formulations of amphotericin B that deliver higher concentrations of the drug, with a theoretical increase in therapeutic potential and decreased nephrotoxicity. Produced from a strain of Streptomyces nodosus. Antifungal activity of amphotericin B results from its ability to insert itself into fungal cytoplasmic membrane at sites that contain ergosterol or other sterols. Aggregates of amphotericin B accumulate at sterol sites, resulting in an increase in cytoplasmic membrane permeability to monovalent ions (eg, potassium, sodium).

At low concentrations, the main effect is increased intracellular loss of potassium, resulting in reversible fungistatic activity; however, at higher concentrations, pores of 40-105 nm in cytoplasmic membrane are produced, leading to large losses of ions and other molecules. A second effect of amphotericin B is its ability to cause auto-oxidation of the cytoplasmic membrane and release of lethal free radicals. Main fungicidal activity of amphotericin B may reside in ability to cause auto-oxidation of cell membranes.

Voriconazole (Vfend)

Clinical Context:  A triazole antifungal agent that inhibits fungal cytochrome P450-mediated 14 alpha-lanosterol demethylation, which is essential in fungal ergosterol biosynthesis. Commonly used in the treatment of aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis, and neutropenic fever. Has excellent MICs against Trichosporon species and has occasionally been effective as monotherapy.

Posaconazole (Noxafil)

Clinical Context:  Triazole antifungal agent. Blocks ergosterol synthesis by inhibiting the enzyme lanosterol 14-alpha-demethylase and sterol precursor accumulation. This action results in cell membrane disruption. Available as oral susp (200 mg/5 mL). Indicated for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in patients at high risk because of severe immunosuppression.

Fluconazole (Diflucan)

Clinical Context:  Triazole derivative with high enteral bioavailability used for Candida infections and infections with endemic mycoses. Also useful for Trichosporon infections. Dose depends on the indication. For trichosporonosis, the dose should be the maximum dosage.

Flucytosine (Ancobon)

Clinical Context:  Pyrimidine analog available enterally or IV for use against a variety of fungal pathogens but is not generally used as monotherapy owing to emergence of resistance during therapy. Well absorbed orally but should be administered IV to critically ill patients.

Caspofungin (Cancidas)

Clinical Context:  Routinely used to treat refractory invasive aspergillosis and invasive candidiasis. First of a new class of antifungal drugs (glucan synthesis inhibitors). Inhibits synthesis of beta-(1,3)-D-glucan, an essential component of fungal cell wall.

Micafungin (Mycamine)

Clinical Context:  Member of new class of antifungal agents, echinocandins, that inhibit cell wall synthesis. Inhibits synthesis of 1,3-beta-D-glucan, an essential fungal cell wall component not present in mammalian cells.

Approved indications include (1) prophylaxis of candidal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and (2) treatment of esophageal candidiasis.

Further Inpatient Care

Patients with trichosporonosis should be monitored carefully, preferably in the ICU, until recovery of an adequate neutrophil count. Continue active antifungal therapy during the period of neutropenia and after recovery of neutrophil count until the resolution of symptoms.

Monitor blood cultures, urine cultures, and cutaneous or ocular lesions, along with renal and hepatic panel blood chemistries.

CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis is indicated in most patients for initial evaluation and should be periodically repeated to monitor the progress of disease. For example, the lesions of hepatosplenic disease may become visible only after recovery of neutrophils.

The patient should remain on therapy until clinically stable and afebrile with the resolution of all visceral lesions.

Prognosis

Trichosporon spp are an emerging opportunistic yeast that tend to cause invasive end-organ disease especially in immunocompromised host. Prognosis is guarded in most patients with invasive disease largely due to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Limited availability of effective antifungal therapy adds to the challenges in managing this disease. Currently, triazoles are first line therapy along with adequate source control measures to maximize successful patient outcomes. 

Author

Mehakmeet Bhatia, DO, Fellow, Department of Infectious Disease, Wayne State University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Lea M Monday, MD, PharmD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Associate Program Director, Infectious Diseases Fellowship, Detroit Medical Center; Attending Physician in Transplant Infectious Diseases, Detroit Receiving Hospital, Harper University Hospital, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Rehab Institute of Michigan, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, and Wayne Health/Tolan Park Infectious Diseases Clinic

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Thomas M Kerkering, MD, FACP, FIDSA, Professor of Medicine with Tenure, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine; Adjunct Professor, Department of Population Studies, Masters of Public Health Program, Virginia Tech University, School of Veterinary Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Pranatharthi Haran Chandrasekar, MBBS, MD, Professor, Chief of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Jeffrey M Zaks, MD, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Vice President, Medical Affairs, Chief Medical Officer, Department of Internal Medicine, Providence Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ryan C Maves, MD, FCCP, FCCM, FIDSA, Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology, Sections of Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Shionogi (Scientific Advisory Board member); LumaBridge (Medical Monitor for RCT)<br/>Received research grant from: AiCuris; Sound Pharmaceuticals.

Acknowledgements

Braden R Hale, MD, MPH, Director, Department of Defense HIV/AIDS Prevention Program, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California.

Braden R Hale, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, Armed Forces Infectious Diseases Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Tyler E Warkentien, MD, MPH, Attending Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

Tyler E Warkentien is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society for Microbiology, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Armed Forces Infectious Diseases Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. The author of this work is an employee of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of his official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. § 105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government’. Title 17 U.S.C. § 101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties.

References

  1. Webster J, Weber R. Basidiomycete yeasts. Introduction to Fungi. Cambridge University Press; 2007. 658-672.
  2. Lima YP, Dias VC. Trichosporon spp.: what’s new?. Future Microbiology. 3/2024. 19 (5):
  3. [Guideline] Chen SC, Perfect J, Colombo AL, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM. Lancet Infect Dis. Dec. 21(12):e375-e386. [View Abstract]
  4. Colombo AL, Padovan AC, Chaves GM. Current knowledge of Trichosporon spp. and Trichosporonosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct. 24(4):682-700. [View Abstract]
  5. de Almeida Júnior JN, Hennequin C. Invasive Trichosporon Infection: a Systematic Review on a Re-emerging Fungal Pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2016 Oct. 17 (7):1629. [View Abstract]
  6. [Guideline] Chagas-Neto TC, Chaves GM, Columbo AL. Update on genus Trichosporon. Mycopathologica. Sept 2008. 166:121-132. [View Abstract]
  7. Fanning S, Mitchell AP. Fungal Biofilms. . PLoS Pathog. (2012). 8(4):
  8. Duarte-Oliveira C, Rodrigues F, Gonçalves SM, Goldman GH, Carvalho A, Cunha C. The Cell Biology of the Trichosporon-Host Interaction. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Apr. 7:118:[View Abstract]
  9. Bieber AK, Pomeranz MK, Kim RH. White Piedra. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Mar. 157(3):339. [View Abstract]
  10. Guerrero-Ponce AE, Araiza J, Tirado-Sánchez A, Bonifaz A. White Piedra: Review of 131 cases. Mycoses. 2024 Jan. 67(1):[View Abstract]
  11. Marine M., Brown N. A., Riano-Pachon D. M., Goldman G. H. On and under the skin: emerging basidiomycetous yeast infections caused by trichosporon species. PLoS Pathog. 2015.
  12. Serena C, Pastor FJ, Gilgado F, Mayayo E, Guarro J. Efficacy of micafungin in combination with other drugs in a murine model of disseminated trichosporonosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Feb. 49(2):497-502. [View Abstract]
  13. Di Bonaventura G, Pompilio A, Picciani C, Iezzi M, D'Antonio D, Piccolomini R. Biofilm formation by the emerging fungal pathogen Trichosporon asahii: development, architecture, and antifungal resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Oct. 50(10):3269-76. [View Abstract]
  14. Castano G, Yarrarapu SNS, Mada PK. Trichosporonosis. StatPearls. 2024 Jan. [View Abstract]
  15. Mehta V, Nayyar C, Gulati N, Singla N, Rai S, Chandar J. A Comprehensive Review of Trichosporon spp.: An Invasive and Emerging Fungus. Cureus. 2021 Aug. 13 (8):e17345. [View Abstract]
  16. Madariaga MG, Tenorio A, Proia L. Trichosporon inkin peritonitis treated with caspofungin. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec. 41(12):5827-9. [View Abstract]
  17. Ramos JM, Cuenca-Estrella M, Gutierrez F, Elia M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Clinical case of endocarditis due to Trichosporon inkin and antifungal susceptibility profile of the organism. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May. 42(5):2341-4. [View Abstract]
  18. Girmenia C, Pagano L, Martino B, et al. Invasive Infections Caused by Trichosporon Species and Geotrichum capitatum in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: a Retrospective Multicenter Study from Italy and Review of the Literature. J Clin Microbiol. Apr 2005. 43:1818-1828. [View Abstract]
  19. Chitasombat MN, Kofteridis DP, Jiang Y, Tarrand J, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Rare opportunistic (non-Candida, non-Cryptococcus) yeast bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. J Infect. 2012 Jan. 64(1):68-75. [View Abstract]
  20. Matsue K, Uryu H, Koseki M, Asada N, Takeuchi M. Breakthrough trichosporonosis in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving micafungin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 15. 42(6):753-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Sugita T, Ikeda R, Nishikawa A. Analysis of Trichosporon isolates obtained from the houses of patients with summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 2004. 42:5467-71. [View Abstract]
  22. Li H, Guo M, Wang C, Li Y, Fernandez AM, Ferraro TN, et al. Epidemiological study of Trichosporon asahii infections over the past 23 years. Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Jul 24. 148:e169. [View Abstract]
  23. Bassetti M, Bisio F, Di Biagio A, Pierri I, Balocco M, Soro O, et al. Trichosporon asahii infection treated with caspofungin combined with liposomal amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Aug. 54(2):575-7. [View Abstract]
  24. Kontoyiannis DP, Torres HA, Chagua M, Hachem R, Tarrand JJ, Bodey GP. Trichosporonosis in a tertiary care cancer center: risk factors, changing spectrum and determinants of outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004. 36(8):564-9. [View Abstract]
  25. Krcmery V, Krupova I, Denning DW. Invasive yeast infections other than Candida spp. in acute leukaemia. J Hosp Infect. 1999 Mar. 41(3):181-94. [View Abstract]
  26. Chagas-Neto TC, Chaves GM, Melo AS, Colombo AL. Bloodstream infections due to Trichosporon spp.: species distribution, Trichosporon asahii genotypes determined on the basis of ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer 1 sequencing, and antifungal susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Apr. 47(4):1074-81. [View Abstract]
  27. Ruan SY, Chien JY, Hsueh PR. Invasive Trichosporonosis Caused by Trichosporon asahii and other Unusual Trichosporon Species at a Medical Center in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 2009. 49:e11-17. [View Abstract]
  28. Benelli JL, Basso RP, Grafulha TW, Poester VR, Munhoz LS, Martins KB, et al. Fungal Bloodstream Co-infection by Trichosporon asahii in a COVID-19 Critical Patient: Case Report and Literature Review. Mycopathologia. 2022 Aug. 187(4):397-404. [View Abstract]
  29. Walsh TJ. Trichosporonosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1989 Mar. 3(1):43-52. [View Abstract]
  30. Vashishtha VM, Mittal A, Garg A. A fatal outbreak of Trichosporon asahii sepsis in a neonatal intensive care Unit. Indian Pediatr. 2012 Sep. 49(9):745-7. [View Abstract]
  31. Antachopoulos C, Papakonstantinou E, Dotis J, Bibashi E, Tamiolaki M, Koliouskas D. Fungemia due to Trichosporon asahii in a neutropenic child refractory to amphotericin B: clearance with voriconazole. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005 May. 27(5):283-5. [View Abstract]
  32. Walsh TJ, Melcher GP, Lee JW, Pizzo PA. Infections due to Trichosporon species: new concepts in mycology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Top Med Mycol. 1993. 5:79-113. [View Abstract]
  33. Jian DY, Yang WC, Chen TW, Lin CC. Trichosporon asahii following polymicrobial infection in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. Peritoneal Dialysis International. Jan-Feb 2008. 28:100-101. [View Abstract]
  34. Nachbaur D, Angelova O, Orth-Höller D, Ditlbacher A, Lackner M, Auberger J, et al. Primary antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin in patients with haematological malignancies: real-life data from a retrospective single-centre observational study. Eur J Haematol. 2014 Aug 1. [View Abstract]
  35. Kröner C, Kappler M, Grimmelt AC, Laniado G, Würstl B, Griese M. The basidiomycetous yeast Trichosporon may cause severe lung exacerbation in cystic fibrosis patients - clinical analysis of Trichosporon positive patients in a Munich cohort. BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Nov. 13;61:[View Abstract]
  36. Hickey PW, Sutton DA, Fothergill AW, Rinaldi MG, Wickes BL, Schmidt HJ, et al. Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans, a novel respiratory pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Oct. 47(10):3091-7. [View Abstract]
  37. 10. Asai N, Kaneko N, Ohkuni Y, Aoshima M, Kawamura Y. Familial Summer-type Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Review of 25 Families and 50 Cases in Japan. Intern Med. 2016. 55(3):279-83. [View Abstract]
  38. Oh TH, Shin SU, Kim SS, Kim SE, Kim UJ, Kang SJ, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis by Trichosporon mucoides: A case report and review of literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 9. 99(41):e22584. [View Abstract]
  39. 12. Mulè A, Rossini F, Sollima A, Lenzi A, Fumarola B, Amadasi S, et al. Trichosporon asahii Infective Endocarditis of Prosthetic Valve: A Case Report and Literature Review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 13. 12(7):1181. [View Abstract]
  40. 13. Milan EP, Silva-Rocha WP, de Almeida JJS, Fernandes TUG, de Araújo Prudente AL, de Azevedo MF, et al. Trichosporon inkin meningitis in Northeast Brazil: first case report and review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 18. 18(1):470. [View Abstract]
  41. 14. Kumar A, Udayakumaran S, Babu R, Rajamma BM, Prakash A, Panikar D, et al. Trichosporon asahii infection presenting as chronic meningo-ventriculitis and intra ventricular fungal ball: a case report and literature review. Mycoses. 2015 Feb. 58(2):99-103. [View Abstract]
  42. Bodey GP. Dermatologic manifestations of infections in neutropenic patients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1994 Sep. 8(3):655-75. [View Abstract]
  43. Kim KW, Ha KY, Kim MS, Choi SM, Lee JS. Postoperative Trichosporon asahii spondylodiscitis after open lumbar discectomy: a case report. Spine. 2008 Feb. 33(4):E116-20. [View Abstract]
  44. Pini G, Faggi E, Donato R, Fanci R. Isolation of Trichosporon in a hematology ward. Mycoses. 2005 Jan. 48(1):45-9. [View Abstract]
  45. Tashiro T, Nagai H, Kamberi P, et al. Disseminated Trichosporon beigelii infection in patients with malignant diseases: immunohistochemical study and review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Mar. 13(3):218-24. [View Abstract]
  46. Bayramoglu G, Sonmez M, Tosun I, Aydin K, Aydin F. Breakthrough Trichosporon asahii fungemia in neutropenic patient with acute leukemia while receiving caspofungin. Infection. 2008 Feb. 36(1):68-70. [View Abstract]
  47. Keay S, Denning DW, Stevens DA. Endocarditis due to Trichosporon beigelii: in vitro susceptibility of isolates and review. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 May-Jun. 13(3):383-6. [View Abstract]
  48. [Guideline] Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, et al. Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12. 71(6):1367-1376. [View Abstract]
  49. Haupt HM, Merz WG, Beschorner WE, et al. Colonization and infection with Trichosporon species in the immunosuppressed host. J Infect Dis. Feb 1983. 147:199-203. [View Abstract]
  50. Vartivarian SE, Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Nov. 17 Suppl 2:S487-91. [View Abstract]
  51. Spiess B, Seifarth W, Hummel M, et al. DNA micro-array based detection and identification of fungal pathogens in clinical samples from neutropenic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov. 45(11):3743-3753. [View Abstract]
  52. Montero CI, Shea YR, Jones PA, et al. Evaluation of pyrosequencing technology for the identification of clinically relevant non-dematiaceous yeasts and related species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Sept. 27:821-830. [View Abstract]
  53. Diaz MR, Fell JW. High-throughput detection of pathogenic yeasts of the genus trichosporon. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug. 42(8):3696-706. [View Abstract]
  54. Almeida Júnior JN, Song AT, Campos SV, Strabelli TM, Del Negro GM, Figueiredo DS, et al. Invasive Trichosporon infection in solid organ transplant patients: a report of two cases identified using IGS1 ribosomal DNA sequencing and a review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014 Feb. 16(1):135-40. [View Abstract]
  55. Walling DM, McGraw DJ, Merz WG, et al. Disseminated infection with Trichosporon beigelii. Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Sep-Oct. 9(5):1013-9. [View Abstract]
  56. Suzuki K, Nakase K, Kyo T, Kohara T, Sugawara Y, Shibazaki T, et al. Fatal Trichosporon fungemia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Eur J Haemato. 2010 May. 84(5):441-447. [View Abstract]
  57. Jo Siu WJ, Tatsumi Y, Senda H, Pillai R, Nakamura T, Sone D, et al. Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of efinaconazole and currently available antifungal agents against a variety of pathogenic fungi associated with onychomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Apr. 57(4):1610-6. [View Abstract]
  58. Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Diaz-Guerra TM, Mellado E, Cano V, Tapia C, Perkins A. Susceptibility patterns and molecular identification of Trichosporon species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Oct. 49(10):4026-34. [View Abstract]
  59. Hosokawa K, Yamazaki H, Mochizuki K, Ohata K, Ishiyama K, Hayashi T, et al. Successful treatment of Trichosporon fungemia in a patient with refractory acute myeloid leukemia using voriconazole combined with liposomal amphotericin B. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 28. [View Abstract]
  60. De Decker K, Van Poucke S, Wojciechowski M. Successful use of posaconazole in a pediatric case of fungal necrotizing fasciitis. Pediatric Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep. 7(5):482-5. [View Abstract]
  61. Rieger C, Geiger S, Herold T, Nickenig C, Ostermann H. Breakthrough infection of Trichosporon asahii during posaconazole treatment in a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Nov. 26(11):843-845. [View Abstract]
  62. Smitherman L. In brief: antifungal drugs. Pediatrics in Review. 2016 Jun 1. 37(6):267-268. [View Abstract]
  63. Dismukes WE. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Apr. 30(4):653-7. [View Abstract]
  64. Liao Y, Yang S, Cong L, Lu X, Ao J, Yang R. In vitro activities of antifungal combinations against biofilms and planktonic forms of clinical Trichosporon asahii isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec. 58(12):7615-6. [View Abstract]
  65. Walsh TJ, Melcher GP, Rinaldi MG, et al. Trichosporon beigelii, an emerging pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul. 28(7):1616-22. [View Abstract]
  66. Chen J, Chen F, Wang Y, Yang LY, Miao M, Han Y, et al. Use of combination therapy to successfully treat breakthrough Trichosporon asahii infection in an acute leukemia patient receiving voriconazole. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2014 Oct. 6:55-7. [View Abstract]
  67. Li H, Lu Q, Wan Z, Zhang J. In vitro combined activity of amphotericin B, caspofungin and voriconazole against clinical isolates of Trichosporon asahii. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Jun. 35(6):550-2. [View Abstract]
Host FactorsClinical featuresMicrobiologic criteria
  • Severe neutropenia for > 10 days
  • Hematologic malignancy
  • Receipt of an allogenic stem cell or solid organ transplant
  • Prolonged use of corticosteroids at a dose of >0.3 mg/kg for >3 weeks in the last 60 days
  • Treatment with T cell or B cell suppressive medications (such as
  • (TNF-alpha blockers, calcineurin inhibitors, Ibrutinib etc.) in the past 90 days
  • Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut, liver or lungs that is refractory to steroids
  • Imaging or cytobiochemical evidence of infection
  • Culture or presence of fungal elements of Trichosporon in a suspected specimen