Nephrotic Syndrome

Back

Practice Essentials

Nephrotic syndrome is the combination of nephrotic-range proteinuria with a low serum albumin level and edema. Nephrotic-range proteinuria is the loss of 3 grams or more per day of protein into the urine or, on a single spot urine collection, the presence of 2 g of protein per gram of urine creatinine.

Nephrotic syndrome has many causes, including primary kidney diseases such as minimal-change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and membranous glomerulonephritis. Nephrotic syndrome can also result from systemic diseases that affect other organs in addition to the kidneys, such as diabetes, amyloidosis, and lupus erythematosus.[1]

Nephrotic syndrome may affect adults and children of both sexes and of any race. It may occur in typical form, or in association with nephritic syndrome. The latter term connotes glomerular inflammation, with hematuria and impaired kidney function.

The first sign of nephrotic syndrome in children is usually swelling of the face; this is followed by swelling of the entire body. Adults can present with dependent edema. Fatigue and loss of appetite are common symptoms. (See Presentation.)

Classification

Nephrotic syndrome can be primary, being a disease specific to the kidneys, or it can be secondary, being a renal manifestation of a systemic general illness. In all cases, injury to glomeruli is an essential feature. Kidney diseases that affect tubules and interstitium, such as interstitial nephritis, will not cause nephrotic syndrome.

Primary causes of nephrotic syndrome include the following, in approximate order of frequency:

Secondary causes include the following, again in order of approximate frequency:

Nephrotic-­range proteinuria may occur in other kidney diseases, such as IgA nephropathy. In that common glomerular disease, one third of patients may have nephrotic-­range proteinuria.[2]

Nephrotic syndrome may occur in persons with sickle cell disease and evolve to renal failure. Membranous nephropathy may complicate bone marrow transplantation, in association with graft versus host disease.

From a therapeutic perspective, nephrotic syndrome may be classified as steroid sensitive, steroid resistant, steroid dependent, or frequently relapsing.

The above causes of nephrotic syndrome are largely those for adults, and this article will concentrate primarily on adult nephrotic syndrome. However, nephrotic syndrome in infancy and childhood is an important entity. For discussion of this topic, see Pediatric Nephrotic Syndrome.

Pathophysiology

In a healthy individual, less than 0.1% of plasma albumin may traverse the glomerular filtration barrier.[3] Controversy exists regarding the sieving of albumin across the glomerular permeability barrier. On the basis of studies in experimental animals, it has been proposed that ongoing albumin passage into the urine occurs in many grams per day, with equivalent substantial tubular uptake of albumin, the result being that the urine contains 80 mg or less of albumin per day.[4]

However, studies of humans with tubular transport defects suggest that the glomerular urinary space albumin concentration is 3.5 mg/L.[5] At this concentration, and a normal daily glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 150 liters, one would expect at most 525 mg per day of albumin in the final urine. In health, urine albumin is less than 50 mg/day, because most of the filtered albumin is re-absorbed by the tubules. Amounts above 500 mg/day point to glomerular disease.

The glomerular capillaries are lined by a fenestrated endothelium that sits on the glomerular basement membrane, which in turn is covered by glomerular epithelium, or podocytes, which envelops the capillaries with cellular extensions called foot processes. In between the foot processes are the filtration slits. These three structures—the fenestrated endothelium, glomerular basement membrane, and glomerular epithelium—are the glomerular filtration barrier. A schematic drawing of the glomerular barrier is provided in the image below.



View Image

Schematic drawing of the glomerular barrier. Podo = podocytes; GBM = glomerular basement membrane; Endo = fenestrated endothelial cells; ESL = endothe....

Filtration of plasma water and solutes is extracellular and occurs through the endothelial fenestrae and filtration slits. The importance of the podocytes and the filtration slits is shown by genetic diseases. In congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type, the gene for nephrin, a protein of the filtration slit, is mutated, leading to nephrotic syndrome in infancy. Similarly, podocin, a protein of the podocytes, may be abnormal in a number of children with steroid-resistant focal glomerulosclerosis.

The glomerular structural changes that may cause proteinuria are damage to the endothelial surface, the glomerular basement membrane, or the podocytes. One or more of these mechanisms may be seen in any one type of nephrotic syndrome. Albuminuria alone may occur or, with greater injury, leakage of all plasma proteins (ie, proteinuria) may take place.

Proteinuria that is more than 85% albumin is selective proteinuria. Albumin has a net negative charge, and it is proposed that loss of glomerular membrane negative charges could be important in causing albuminuria. Nonselective proteinuria, being a glomerular leakage of all plasma proteins, would not involve changes in glomerular net charge but rather a generalized defect in permeability. This construct does not permit clear-cut separation of causes of proteinuria, except in minimal-change nephropathy, in which proteinuria is selective.

Pathogenesis of edema

There are two current hypotheses for the formation of edema in nephrotic syndrome. The underfill hypothesis holds that the loss of albumin leading to lower plasma colloid pressure is the cause. The overfill hypothesis states that the edema is due to primary renal sodium retention.

Underfill hypothesis

An increase in glomerular permeability leads to albuminuria and eventually to hypoalbuminemia. In turn, hypoalbuminemia lowers the plasma colloid osmotic pressure, causing greater transcapillary filtration of water throughout the body and thus the development of edema.

Capillary hydrostatic pressure and the gradient of plasma to interstitial fluid oncotic pressure determine the movement of fluid from the vascular compartment to the interstitium. The oncotic pressure is mainly determined by the protein content. The flux of water across the capillary wall can be expressed by the following formula:

Qw = K ([Pc -­ pp] ­- [Pi ­- pi]

In this formula, Qw is net flux of water, K is the capillary filtration coefficient, Pc is capillary hydrostatic pressure, and pp is the plasma oncotic pressure, while Pi is the interstitial fluid hydrostatic pressure and pi is the interstitial fluid oncotic pressure, shown schematically below.



View Image

Forces determining capillary filtration

With a high enough capillary hydrostatic pressure or a low enough intravascular oncotic pressure, the amount of fluid filtered exceeds the maximal lymphatic flow, and edema occurs. In patients with nephrotic syndrome, this causes a reduction in plasma volume, with a secondary increase of sodium and water retention by the kidneys.

Overfill Hypothesis

An alternative hypothesis is an intrinsic defect in the renal tubules which cause a decrease in sodium excretion. This could occur if the filtered intraluminal protein directly stimulated renal epithelial sodium reabsorption.[6] Two facts support this hypothesis: (1) sodium retention is observed even before the serum albumin level starts falling, and (2) intravascular volume is normal or even increased in most patients with nephrotic syndrome.

A third possible mechanism is an enhanced peripheral capillary permeability to albumin, as shown by radioisotopic technique in human studies of 60 patients with nephrotic syndrome.[7] This would then lead to increased tissue oncotic pressure and fluid retention in the peripheral tissues.  

Metabolic consequences of proteinuria

Metabolic consequences of the nephrotic syndrome include the following:

Acute kidney injury may indicate an underlying glomerulonephritis but is more often precipitated by hypovolemia or sepsis. Edema of the kidneys that causes a pressure-­mediated reduction in the GFR has also been proposed.

Additional consequences include the following:

Infection

Infection is a major concern in nephrotic syndrome. Both gram positive and gram negative bacterial infect. Varicella infection is also common. The most common infectious complications are bacterial sepsis, cellulitis, pneumonia, and peritonitis.

Proposed explanations for the increased infection risk include the following:

Hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis

Hyperlipidemia is a classic feature of the nephrotic syndrome, rather than a mere complication. It is related to the hypoproteinemia and low serum oncotic pressure of nephrotic syndrome, which then leads to reactive hepatic protein synthesis, including of lipoproteins.[8] In addition, reduced plasma levels of lipoprotein lipase results in diminution of lipid catabolism. Some of the elevated serum lipoproteins are filtered at the glomeruli, leading to lipiduria and the classic findings of oval fat bodies and fatty casts in the urine sediment.

Atherosclerotic vascular disease appears to occur in greater frequency in persons with nephrotic syndrome than in healthy persons of the same age. Curry and Roberts showed that the frequency and extent of coronary artery stenoses were greater in patients with nephrotic syndrome than in non-nephrotic control subjects.[9]

When their study was published, in 1977, lipid-lowering treatments were less widely used than they are today. Accordingly, the average highest serum total cholesterol in this series was over 400 mg/dL. That is in the range of serum cholesterol seen in familial hypercholesterolemia, a disease that predisposes individuals to myocardial infarction.

Hypocalcemia

Hypocalcemia is common in the nephrotic syndrome, but rather than being a true hypocalcemia, it is usually caused by a low serum albumin level. Nonetheless, low bone density and abnormal bone histology are reported in association with nephrotic syndrome. This could be caused by urinary losses of vitamin D–binding proteins, with consequent hypovitaminosis D and, as a result, reduced intestinal calcium absorption.[10]

Tessitore et al reported that when the GFR was normal, persons with the nephrotic syndrome had no consistent calcium or bony abnormalities.[11] Yet in that same study, when the GFR was reduced, bone mineralization defects were found by biopsy. A later study found osteomalacia on bone biopsy in over half of adults who had longstanding nephrotic syndrome but whose GFR was preserved.[10]

Low bone mass may be found in relation to cumulative steroid dose.[12]  However, intermittent corticosteroid treatment of childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome was not  associated with bone mineral deficits in one study.[13] It is possible that long duration of either the nephrotic syndrome or treatments for it are the important risk factors for bone disease in these patients.

Hypercoagulability

Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are well-known complications of the nephrotic syndrome. Hypercoagulability in these cases appears to derive from urinary loss of anticoagulant proteins, such as antithrombin III and plasminogen, along with the simultaneous increase in clotting factors, especially factors I, VII, VIII, and X.

A study by Mahmoodi et al of almost 300 patients with nephrotic syndrome confirmed that the annual incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was almost 10 times higher in these persons than in the normal population (1% vs 0.1 to 0.2%).[14] Moreover, that risk appeared especially elevated during the first 6 months of nephrotic syndrome, being at almost 10%. This high incidence may justify the routine use of preventive anticoagulation treatment during the first 6 months of a persistent nephrotic syndrome.

Mahmoodi et al's study also showed an increased risk of arterial thrombotic events in subjects with nephrotic syndrome, including coronary and cerebrovascular ones. Unlike the risk of VTE, which was related to proteinuria, this arterial risk was related to usual risk factors for arterial disease, such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and reduced GFR.

Hypovolemia

Hypovolemia occurs when hypoalbuminemia decreases the plasma oncotic pressure, resulting in a loss of plasma water into the interstitium and causing a decrease in circulating blood volume. Hypovolemia is generally observed only when the patient's serum albumin level is less than 1.5 g/dL. Symptoms include vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. The signs include cold hands and feet, delayed capillary filling, oliguria, and tachycardia. Hypotension is a late feature.

Etiology

Common primary causes of nephrotic syndrome include kidney diseases such as minimal-­change nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, and focal glomerulosclerosis. Secondary causes include systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, lupus erythematosus, and amyloidosis. Congenital and hereditary focal glomerulosclerosis may result from mutations of genes that code for podocyte proteins, including nephrin, podocin, or the cation channel 6 protein.[15] Nephrotic syndrome can result from drugs of abuse, such as heroin.

The proposed mechanisms of membranous nephropathy are as follows:

  1. Immune complex deposition from the circulation
  2. In-situ formation of immune complexes through the reaction of circulating autoantibodies to a native antigen
  3. In-situ formation of immune complexes with a non-native (extrinsic) antigen that is bound to the podocytes or glomerular basement membrane

The first mechanism could explain the secondary membranous nephropathy of systemic lupus erythematosus.

The second mechanism appears to explain 70% of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies are found in about 70% of patients who have idiopathic membranous glomerular nephropathy.[16] These IgG antibodies are found both circulating in the plasma and deposited on the glomerular basement membranes. 

The third mechanism may explain the rare occurrence of nephrotic syndrome in subjects treated with enzyme replacement therapy for genetic enzyme deficiency diseases such as Pompe or Fabry disease[17, 18] This may result from allo-antibodies to the infused enzyme that are deposited on the glomerular basement membrane, with ensuing secondary membranous nephropathy.

Nephrotic­-range proteinuria occurring in the third trimester of pregnancy is the classical finding of preeclampsia. It may occur de novo or it may be superimposed on another chronic kidney disease. In the latter case, the patient will have had preexisting proteinuria that worsened during pregnancy.

Medication can cause nephrotic syndrome. This includes the very infrequent occurrence of minimal­-change nephropathy with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the occurrence of membranous nephropathy with use of gold and penicillamine, which are older drugs used for rheumatic diseases. Focal glomerulosclerosis can occur in association with intravenous bisphosphonates. Lithium and interferon therapy have been associated with focal glomerulosclerosis of the collapsing type.

Nephrotic-­range proteinuria could occur with the use of anticancer agents, such as bevacizumab, that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).[19] However, the clinical picture of this complication is of a thrombotic microangiopathy rather than of nephrotic syndrome per se.

The association of membranous nephropathy with cancer is a clinical dilemma. This association presumably results from immune complex injury to the glomeruli caused by cancer antigens. While about 6000 new cases of membranous nephropathy occur each year in the United States, 1.5 million new cases of non-skin cancer are diagnosed. Therefore, from the oncologist’s standpoint, the problem of paraneoplastic membranous nephropathy is trivial. However, a carefully performed analysis from France suggested that the cancer rate is approximately 10-­fold higher in persons with membranous nephropathy than in the general population, especially in individuals over age 65 years.[20] In that study, 50% of membranous nephropathy cases were diagnosed before the diagnosis of cancer. Thus, in some patients with membranous nephropathy one should consider the possibility of an undiagnosed cancer.

Epidemiology

United States statistics

The figure below shows the incidence per million population of important causes of nephrotic syndrome. Diabetic nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome is most common, at an estimated rate of at least 50 cases per million population.  In children, nephrotic syndrome may occur at a rate of 20 cases per million children.[21]



View Image

Incidence of important causes of nephrotic syndrome, in number per million population. The left panel shows systemic causes, and the right panel lists....

International statistics

Biopsy studies in children with nephrotic syndrome have shown similar types of histology in India and Turkey, compared with what one would expect in Western countries.[22, 23] In Pakistani adults with nephrotic syndrome, the spectrum of histologies of kidney biopsies is similar to that seen in western countries.[24]

In parts of Africa and the Middle East (eg, Egypt), glomerular disease may be associated with urogenital schistosomal infection.[25] However, so-called tropical nephrotic syndrome from parasitic diseases such as schistosomiasis or malaria may not be a true entity.

Doe et al reviewed causes of nephrotic syndrome in African children; kidney biopsy most often showed typical histologic findings (focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease).[26]

The connection of nephrotic syndrome to quartan malaria is not well-established. Indeed, Pakasa and Sumaili call attention to the apparent decline of parasite-associated nephrotic syndrome in the Congo.[27, 28] It is possible that the perceived association between nephrotic syndrome and parasitic infections was coincidental, as supported by the ongoing and probably increasing occurrence of chronic kidney disease in the Congo.[28]

Race-, sex-, and age-related demographics

Because diabetes is major cause of nephrotic syndrome, American Indians, Hispanics, and African Americans have a higher incidence of nephrotic syndrome than do white persons. HIV nephropathy is a complication of HIV infection that is unusual in whites; it is seen with greater frequency in African Americans, because of their much greater prevalence of the ApoL1 risk alleles.[29] Focal glomerulosclerosis appears to be overrepresented as a cause of nephrotic syndrome in African-American as compared with white children.[30]

There is a male predominance in the occurrence of nephrotic syndrome, as for chronic kidney disease in general. This male overrepresentation is also seen in paraneoplastic membranous nephropathy.[20]  But lupus nephritis affects mostly women.

The image below shows typical ages at which a given cause of nephrotic syndrome may occur. It does not show every possible cause of nephrotic syndrome, such as lupus nephritis, which typically affects young black women. The ages shown are averages.



View Image

A schema of the average patient age at presentation in various common forms of nephrotic syndrome. (Timeline not to scale.)

Prognosis

In the pre-antibiotic era, infection was a major factor in the mortality rate among patients with nephrotic syndrome.[31] Treatments for nephrotic syndrome and its complications have reduced the morbidity and mortality once associated with the syndrome. Currently, the prognosis for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome depends on its cause.

Infants with congenital nephrotic syndrome have a dismal prognosis: survival beyond several months is possible only with dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Only approximately 20% of patients with focal glomerulosclerosis undergo remission of proteinuria; an additional 10% improve but remain proteinuric. Many patients experience frequent relapses, become steroid-dependent, or become steroid-resistant. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) develops in 25-30% of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis by 5 years and in 30-40% of these patients by 10 years.

The prognosis for patients with minimal-change nephropathy is very good. Most children respond to steroid therapy; still, about 50% of children have one or two relapses within 5 years and approximately 20% of them continue to relapse 10 years after diagnosis. Only 30% of children never have a relapse after the initial episode. Approximately 3% of patients who initially respond to steroids become steroid-resistant.

Adults with minimal-change nephropathy have a burden of relapse similar to that of children. However, the long-term prognosis for kidney function in patients with this disease is excellent, with little risk of renal failure.

Analysis of 441 adult and pediatric patients by the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE)  found that complete remission of proteinuria occurred in 45% of cases, while 5% progressed to ESRD. The following were inversely associated with complete remission of proteinuria[32] :

Poor patient response to steroid therapy may predict a poor outcome. Children who present with hematuria and hypertension are more likely to be steroid-resistant and have a poorer prognosis than those without hematuria or hypertension. In a retrospective study of pediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, 13 of 16 patients achieved remission with calcineurin inhibitor therapy. However, three of the 13 experienced recurrences and progressed to ESRD.[33]

Of patients with nephrotic syndrome due to membranous nephropathy, approximately 30% experience spontaneous remission. Of those with persistent nephrotic syndrome, 40% to 50% progress to ESRD over a period of 10 years.[34]

Donadio et al reported 140 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, 89 of whom received no treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs and 51 of whom were treated primarily with short-term courses of prednisone alone, and found that survival rates in these patients were the same as those expected for the general population.[35]

The prognosis may worsen because of (1) an increased incidence of renal failure and the complications secondary to nephrotic syndrome, including thrombotic episodes and infection, or (2) treatment-related conditions, such as infectious complications of immunosuppressive drug therapy.

In secondary nephrotic syndromes, morbidity and mortality are related to the primary disease process (eg, diabetes, lupus, amyloidosis). In diabetic nephropathy, however, the magnitude of proteinuria itself relates directly to mortality.[36]

In diabetic nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome, patients usually have a good response to angiotensin blockade, with reduction of proteinuria and some slowing of the loss of renal function. True remission is uncommon, however. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality increase as kidney function declines, and some patients will eventually need dialysis or a kidney transplant.

In primary amyloidosis, prognosis is not good, even with intensive chemotherapy. In secondary amyloidosis, remission of the underlying cause, such as rheumatoid arthritis, is followed by remission of the amyloidosis and its associated nephrotic syndrome.

Patient Education

Pediatric nephrotic syndrome is a chronic illness characterized by relapses and remissions, which can extend throughout childhood. There will be illness from the disease and from its treatment. Parents may monitor their child's urine and record the results in a diary. The diary can also be used to write down an agreed-upon plan for the management of relapses. Information booklets should be given to the family. Peer support and psychological counseling may be helpful.

Nephrotic syndrome in adults can also wax and wane, with the complications as reviewed above.

Progression to renal failure will require preparation for dialysis and/or kidney transplantation.

History

The first sign of nephrotic syndrome in children is usually swelling of the face; this is followed by swelling of the entire body. Adults can present with dependent edema. Foamy urine may be a presenting feature. Fatigue and loss of appetite are common symptoms. A thrombotic complication, such as deep venous thrombosis of the calf veins or even a pulmonary embolus, may be the first clue to nephrotic syndrome.

Additional historical features can be related to the cause of nephrotic syndrome. Thus, the recent start of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) suggests such drugs as the cause and a more than 10-year history of diabetes with symptomatic neuropathy indicates diabetic nephropathy.

Physical Examination

Edema is the salient feature of nephrotic syndrome and initially develops around the eyes and legs. With time, the edema becomes generalized and may be associated with an increase in weight, the development of ascites, or pleural effusions.

Hematuria and hypertension manifest in a minority of patients.

Additional features on exam will vary according to cause and as a result of whether or not renal function impairment exists. Thus, in the case of longstanding diabetes, the patient may have diabetic retinopathy, which correlates closely with diabetic nephropathy. If the kidney function is reduced, the patient may have hypertension, anemia, or both.

Approach Considerations

Diagnostic studies for nephrotic syndrome may include the following:

In infants with nephrotic syndrome, genetic testing for the NPHS1 and NPHS2 mutations may be useful. These are mutations of nephrin and podocin, respectively. In children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, testing for the NPHS2 mutation may be indicated.

In the future, novel urinary biomarkers may become available that can identify the cause and severity of nephrotic syndrome.[37]  See Novel Biomarkers of Renal Function.

Urine Studies

Urinalysis

Urinalysis is the first test used in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome. Nephrotic-range proteinuria will be apparent by 3+ or 4+ readings on the dipstick, or by semiquantitative testing by sulfosalicylic acid. A 3+ reading represents 300 mg/dL of urinary protein or more, which correlates with a daily loss of 3 g or more and thus is in the nephrotic range. The chemistry of the dipsticks is such that albumin is the major protein that is tested.

Glucosuria points to diabetes.

Urine sediment examination

The urine sediment exam may show cells and/or casts.

Waxy casts mark proteinuric renal disease. By use of a polarizing microscope, one can see oval fat bodies and also fatty casts. These point to the nephrotic syndrome. They occur because of glomerular filtration of lipoproteins; the tubular cells that endocytose these lipoproteins then fall off into the urine. Viewed by polarizer, the oval fat bodies and fatty casts cause a "Maltese cross" appearance.

The presence of more than 2 red blood cells (RBCs) per high power field is indicative of microhematuria. Microhematuria may occur in membranous nephropathy but not in minimal-change nephropathy.

Glomerular disease may allow RBCs to traverse the damaged glomerular basement membrane, and the RBCs in the sediment may then be deformed, or dysmorphic. This points to glomerular disease with inflammation and destruction of the normal structures (ie, a nephritis, and thus a nephritic picture, with hematuria, oliguria, azotemia, and hypertension). This could occur in, for example, nephrotic syndromes associated with IgA nephropathy or proliferative glomerulonephritis.

More than 2 granular casts in the entire sediment is a biomarker for renal parenchymal disease. Variable-caliber and broad granular casts point to reduced renal function.

Urinary protein measurement

Urinary protein is measured by a timed collection or a single spot collection.[38] A timed collection is typically done over a 24-hour period, starting at 7 am and finishing the next day at the same time. In healthy individuals, less than 150 mg of total protein is present in a 24-hour urine collection.

A single spot urine collection is much easier to obtain. When the ratio of urine protein to urine creatinine is greater than 2 g/g, this corresponds to 3 g of urinary protein per day or more.

The exact type of urine protein is of potential interest. This can be tested by urine protein electrophoresis. Proteinuria that does not include albumin may point to overflow proteinuria that occurs in paraproteinemias, such as multiple myeloma.

There has been intermittent interest in establishing whether proteinuria is "selective" for albumin (ie, >85% albumin), as opposed to nonselective. In the case of selective proteinuria, a charge-selective leak of albumin across the glomerular barrier may be occurring, perhaps due to reduced negative charges on that barrier, whereas nonselective proteinurias point to more substantial glomerular injury and perhaps also predict lesser response to prednisone treatment.

 

Renal Biopsy

For childhood nephrotic syndrome, a renal biopsy is indicated for the following:

Adult nephrotic syndrome of unknown origin may require a renal biopsy for diagnosis. Reaching a pathological diagnosis is important because minimal-change disease, focal glomerulosclerosis, and membranous nephropathy have different treatment options and prognoses. It is important to differentiate minimal-change disease presenting in adults from focal glomerulosclerosis, as the former has an excellent response to steroids. Another entity called immunoglobulin M (IgM) nephropathy falls in between the two and has an intermediate response to steroids.

A renal biopsy is not indicated in adults with nephrotic syndrome from an obvious cause. For example, in a patient with longstanding diabetes and diabetic retinopathy, the nephrotic syndrome is likely to be secondary to diabetic nephropathy, so kidney biopsy may be unnecessary. However, it is important to not assume diabetic nephropathy as the causative factor for nephrotic syndrome in all diabetic persons. A duration of diabetes of less than 5 years and the absence of retinopathy and neuropathy are clues to non-diabetic kidney disease.

It is worth noting that in clinical experience with kidney biopsies, the cause of nephrotic-range proteinuria is glomerular disease, not tubular disease. This contradicts the proposal that tubular function determines proteinuria.[4]

Laboratory Studies

Kidney function

Serum tests for kidney function are essential. Serum creatinine will be in the normal range in uncomplicated nephrotic syndrome, such as that occurring in minimal-change nephropathy. In children, the serum creatinine level will be lower than it is in adults. The normal adult serum creatinine level is approximately 1 mg/dL, whereas that of a child aged 5 years will be about 0.5 mg/dL. Values higher than this in children indicate reduced kidney function.

Serum albumin

The serum albumin level is classically low in nephrotic syndrome, being below its normal range of 3.5-4.5 g/dL. In a single-center study of patients who underwent kidney biopsy for idiopathic proteinuria, Gupta et al found that the frequency of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis increased to three-quarters of the cases when patients had near-normal serum albumin levels.[39]

Serologic studies

In adults with nephrotic syndrome, tests for hepatitis B and C, HIV, and even syphilis may be useful. Tests for lupus, including antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti–double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, and complement, may be useful. Testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) is not indicated in typical nephrotic syndrome, because that test is associated with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, which presents with a nephritic picture rather than one that is typically nephrotic.

Tests for previous streptococcal infection, such as antistreptolysin O, are not usually indicated for nephrotic syndrome, since postinfectious glomerulonephritis usually causes a nephritic rather than a nephrotic syndrome.

Phospholipase A2 receptor

Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2 R) is a cell surface transmembrane receptor expressed on the surface of podocytes. Seventy percent of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy have autoantibodies directed against PLA2 R.[40] Levels of this antibody have a strong correlation with clinical disease activity and thus help in monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy.[41]  Absence of these antibodies may suggest secondary membranous nephropathy such as that associated with cancers.

During treatment, the levels of the antibodies generally decline before remission of proteinuria. After treatment, about half the patients who are PLA2R negative remain in remission for 5 years, but those who remain PLA2R positive relapse in just 2 years. Use of the PLA2R antibody test has changed the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Histologic Findings

These are particular to the causes of nephrotic syndrome, such as minimal change nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, or diabetic nephropathy, and are discussed in the Medscape Reference articles on those conditions.

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonographic scanning shows whether a patient has two kidneys. Individuals with a single kidney may be prone to developing focal glomerulosclerosis. Having only one kidney is also a relative contraindication to kidney biopsy.

Ultrasonography also demonstrates renal echogenicity. Increased renal echogenicity is consistent with intrarenal fibrosis (ie, chronic disease with reduced kidney function).

Approach Considerations

Specific treatment of nephrotic syndrome depends on its cause. These are detailed in the Medscape articles specific to each of these disorders. Treatment varies between adult and pediatric patients. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) issued guidelines in 2012 that include recommendations on treatment of nephrotic syndrome in adults and children.[42]

A study using the Cochrane database has put into question whether prednisone treatment is beneficial in adult minimal-change nephropathy.[43]  Nevertheless, treatment is needed when the nephrotic syndrome causes illness such as uncomfortable edema or associated coagulopathy.

The role of preventive anticoagulation in nephrotic syndrome has been reported, but there is no proof that it is beneficial.

Hyperlipidemia occurs in nephrotic syndrome, and it can be controlled with lipid-lowering agents (eg, statins—with the exception of rosuvastatin, which can worsen proteinuria[44] —bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, nicotinic acid and ezetimibe). In addition, lipoprotein apheresis, which is a second-line therapy for pediatric patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, may yield clinical benefits in nephrotic syndrome.[45] Inhibitors of PCSK9 show promise as potential future therapy.[45, 44] However, the ideal therapeutic target is the proteinuria, given  the central role of proteinuria in the pathogenesis of lipid disorders in nephrotic syndrome.[44]

Specific treatment in children

For children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment. Alternative immunosuppressive agents (eg, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], calcineurin inhibitors, levamisole) are often used in children with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. For steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, calcineurin inhibitors are the principal choice; children who fail to respond may be tried on agents such as MMF or prolonged and/or high-dose intravenous pulse corticosteroids.[46, 47, 48]

Rituximab, an antibody against B-cells, has proved an effective steroid-sparing agent in children with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. However, children dependent on both steroids and calcineurin inhibitors are less likely to achieve drug-free remission with rituximab.[49]  Rituximab may also be used in children with steroid-resistant disease.[46]

The benefits of rituximab for nephrotic syndrome were shown in a study in 10 children and 20 adults with minimal-change disease/mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis who had suffered two or more recurrences over the previous year and were in steroid-induced remission for 1 month or longer. At 1 year after receiving one or two doses of rituximab, all patients were in remission: 18 had been fully weaned from steroids and 15 had never relapsed. In addition, rituximab halted disease-associated growth deficit in the children.[50]

Maxted et al retrospectively compared 7 different rituximab dosing regimens—from 1 to 4 doses of 375 to 750 mg/m2—in 60 children with steroid-sensitive frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Probability of relapse at 12 months or time to B cell reconstitution was not significantly different in children who received a single 375 mg/m2 dose than in those treated with a conventional higher dose.[51]

A pilot study by Bonanni et al tested the new fully humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab in four children with persistent proteinuria despite a full drug approach (including rituximab). The two patients with normal renal function experienced remission of proteinuria—transient in one patient and persistent in the other—while the two with impaired renal function failed to respond. This study used a low-dose two-infusion ofatumumab regimen (300+700 mg/1.73 m2 2 weeks apart); the authors suggest testing whether higher doses of ofatumumab may be effective in patients with renal impairment.[52]

In a retrospective study of 64 children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome and 18 children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, treatment with cyclosporine A or cyclosporine A plus mycophenolate mofetil resulted in remission in 14 of the 18 steroid-resistant patients (eight with cyclosporine A and six with combination treatment). In the steroid-dependent group, 15 patients (23%) received no medication, cyclosporine A was effective in 31 of 38 patients (82%), and mycophenolate mofetil was effective in all patients in whom cyclosporine A treatment was not successful.[53]

A Cochrane review of corticosteroid regimens in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome concluded that continuing prednisone for more than 2 or 3 months after the initial episode offers no benefit. In addition, although corticosteroids are customarily given every other day in this setting, switching to daily dosing at the onset of an upper respiratory tract or viral infection reduces the risk of relapse.[54]

In pediatric patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome, an open-label randomized controlled trial by Yadav et al found low-dose daily dosing of prednisolone (0.2-0.3 mg/kg) was more effective than alternate-day dosing (0.5-0.7 mg/kg). Compared with patients on alternate-day therapy (n=31), patients receiving daily prednisolone (n = 30) showed significantly fewer relapses (0.55 versus 1.94 relapses/person-year), as well as higher rates of sustained remission at 1 year (60% versus 31.6%; P = 0.013), lower rates of treatment failure at 1 year (6.7 versus 57.4%; P <  0.0001), and lower prednisolone use (0.27 ± 0.07 versus 0.39 ± 0.19 mg/kg/day; P = 0.003).[55]

Congenital nephrotic syndrome (eg, from mutations in NPHS or WT1) is often treated with bilateral nephrectomy followed by dialysis and transplantation. However, Dufek et al reported that an individualized, stepwise approach with prolonged conservative management may also be effective.[56]

Specific treatment in adults

Treatment varies by etiology, as follows:

Membranous nephropathy

In membranous nephropathy, management with angiotensin blockade but without immunosuppression can be used for the first 6 months in patients at low risk for progression (ie, those with serum creatinine level < 1.5 mg/dL and less than 4 g of proteinuria per day). Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL) or those with higher amounts of urine protein are at risk for loss of kidney function and should receive immunosuppressive therapy.[58]  This includes regimens that combine prednisone with cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil. Mycophenolate mofetil is not helpful in membranous nephropathy.

Rituximab is effective in membranous nephropathy in adults. In the randomized MENTOR trial, which compared rituximab with cyclosporine in 130 patients with membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome who had been receiving angiotensin blockade for at least 3 months, rituximab proved noninferior. At 12 months, 39 of 65 patients (60%) in the rituximab group and 34 of 65 (52%) in the cyclosporine group had a complete or partial remission; at 24 months, the remission rate was unchanged in the rituximab group but had decreased to 20% (13 of 65 patients) in the cyclosporine group.[59, 34]

Acute Nephrotic Syndrome in Childhood

With good parental and patient education and close outpatient follow-up care, hospitalization is not usually necessary. Hospitalization should be considered if any of the following are present:

Diuretics are needed. Furosemide (1 mg/kg/d) and spironolactone (2 mg/kg/d) will help when fluid retention is severe, provided no signs of renal failure or volume contraction are evident.

Achieving a satisfactory diuresis is difficult when the patient's serum albumin level is less than 1.5 g/dL. Albumin in a dose of 1 g/kg may be given intravenously (IV), followed by IV furosemide. Use of this approach is based on the premise that raising the serum albumin level will ‘pull’ fluid from the extravascular to the intravascular space. Albumin may also increase diuretic delivery to the kidney by keeping furosemide within the vascular space, decreasing its catabolism and facilitating its secretion into the tubular lumen.

Complications of using IV albumin may occur, including pulmonary edema. In addition, some evidence suggests that administration of albumin may delay the response to steroids and may even induce more frequent relapses, probably by causing severe glomerular epithelial damage. Fluid removal and weight loss remain transient unless proteinuria remits.

To prevent infection, oral penicillin can be prescribed for children with gross edema. Abdominal paracentesis should be performed if the patient develops signs of peritonitis, and any bacterial infection should be treated promptly. A non-immune patient with varicella should get immunoglobulin therapy if exposed to chickenpox, and acyclovir should be given if the patient develops chickenpox.

Depending on the cause of nephrotic syndrome, a patient may need specialty consultation. For example, an individual with lupus nephritis will benefit from rheumatologic consultation.

Acute Nephrotic Syndrome in Adults

The principles for management of adults with acute nephrotic syndrome are similar to those for children. Diuretics will be needed; furosemide, spironolactone, and even metolazone may be used. Volume depletion may occur with diuretic use, which should be monitored by assessment of symptoms, weight, pulse, and blood pressure.

Anticoagulation has been advocated for use in preventing thromboembolic complications, but its use in primary prevention is unproven.

Hypolipidemic agents may be used. If the nephrotic syndrome cannot be controlled, the patient will have persistent hyperlipidemia.

In secondary nephrotic syndrome, such as that associated with diabetic nephropathy, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers are widely used. These may reduce proteinuria by reducing the systemic blood pressure, by reducing intraglomerular pressure, and also by direct action on podocytes.

Diet and Activity

The diet in patients with nephrotic syndrome should provide adequate caloric intake and adequate protein (1 g/kg/d). Supplemental dietary protein is of no proven value.

A low-salt diet will limit the fluid retention and edema that occurs in nephrotic syndrome. A 24-hour urine collection is useful to quantify dietary intake of sodium. More than 88 mEq/day in the 24-hour urine suggests high salt intake. The help of a dietician will be useful to bring the daily sodium intake down to 2 g (88 mEq)/day or less. Fluid restriction per se is not needed.

There are no activity restrictions for patients with nephrotic syndrome. Ongoing activity, rather than bedrest, will reduce the risk of blood clots.

Long-Term Monitoring

Ongoing use and adjustment of diuretics and angiotensin antagonists are done according to the amount of edema and proteinuria that a patient has.

Follow-up care in patients with nephrotic syndrome also includes immunizations and monitoring for corticosteroid toxicity.

Routine immunizations should be delayed until the patient is free of relapses and has been off immunosuppression for 3 months.[60] Pneumococcal and influenza vaccines are recommended but are not routinely used, because their efficacy is not established.[61, 62] Children who have received immunosuppressive therapy in the preceding 3 months and are not immune to varicella should receive zoster immunoglobulin if they are exposed to chickenpox or shingles. These patients should also receive acyclovir if they develop chickenpox.[63]

Monitoring for steroid toxicity every 3 months in the outpatient clinic will detect adverse effects such as slowing of growth. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D may attenuate bone loss. A yearly checkup will detect cataracts.[64]

 

Medication Summary

Corticosteroids (prednisone), cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine are used to induce remission in nephrotic syndrome. Diuretics are used to reduce edema. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers can reduce proteinuria.

Treatment should be dictated by the type of renal pathology causing nephrotic syndrome.

Minimal-change disease has an excellent response to corticosteroids, while in focal glomerulosclerosis, only 20% of patients respond well to corticosteroids. Renal biopsy is very helpful to differentiate minimal-change disease and its variants such as IgM nephropathy and C1q nephropathy. Very few randomized trials are available to guide treatment for minimal-change disease in adults. Prednisone in short courses from 12-20 weeks’ duration remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with minimal-change disease.

Immunosuppressive medications other than steroids are usually reserved for steroid-resistant patients with persistent edema, or for steroid-dependent patients with significant steroid-related adverse effects.

Cyclophosphamide may benefit patients who have frequently relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Associated complications include bone marrow suppression, hair loss, reduced sperm counts, hemorrhagic cystitis, malignancy, and infertility.

Cyclosporine is indicated when relapses occur after cyclophosphamide treatment. Cyclosporine may be preferable in a pubertal male who is at risk of developing cyclophosphamide-induced azoospermia. Cyclosporine is a highly effective maintenance therapy for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome who are able to stop steroids or take lower doses, but some evidence suggests that although remission is maintained as long as cyclosporine is administered, relapses are frequent when treatment is discontinued.

Cyclosporine can be nephrotoxic and can cause hirsutism, hypertension, and gingival hypertrophy.

For focal glomerulosclerosis, prednisone, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide have all been used in treatment. Corticosteroids should be the first-line agent, with cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine as backup for steroid-resistant cases. Mycophenolate and rituximab have also been used in treating focal glomerulosclerosis. However, data on the use of these latter two agents are not convincing.

For idiopathic membranous nephropathy, prednisone along with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide remains important for treatment. Other agents that have been used include cyclosporine, synthetic corticotropin, and rituximab.

A Cochrane review of immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome concluded that combination treatment with an alkylating agent and a corticosteroid has both short- and long-term benefits, and that cyclophosphamide is a safer alkylating agent than chlorambucil. A 6-month course of alternating monthly cycles of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide is recommended in the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline as initial therapy for adult idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome, but the benefits of this regimen are not supported by high-quality evidence.[42] Cyclosporine or tacrolimus are recommended as alternatives.[65]

Rituximab has been effective in some cases of nephrotic syndrome that relapse after prednisone treatment or in cases resistant to prednisone treatment.[66] This drug is a chimeric murine/human antibody against the CD20 antigen of B cells. It presumably exerts its benefit by suppressing antibody production. Its adverse effect to cause immunosuppression cannot be ignored.

Natural, highly purified corticotropin gel formulation (repository corticotropin injection) is also a potential treatment option for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and has shown some results in reducing proteinuria. However, reported data are based solely on retrospective and observational studies, and, hence, this therapy should be tested further in controlled trials.[67, 68] The mechanism by which this drug decreases proteinuria is unclear. It is presumed to have an anti-inflammatory action. Its adverse effect profile is similar to steroids, but the most striking disadvantage is its cost.

Prednisone

Clinical Context:  Prednisone is an immunosuppressant used in treatment of autoimmune disorders. This agent may decrease inflammation by reversing increased capillary permeability and suppressing polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) activity. It may be administered as a single dose in the morning or as divided doses; once-daily dosing is equally effective and greatly improves compliance.

Class Summary

Corticosteroids have anti-inflammatory properties and modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.

Cyclophosphamide

Clinical Context:  Cyclophosphamide is a cyclic polypeptide that suppresses some humoral immune activity. It is chemically related to nitrogen mustards. In the liver, this agent is biotransformed by the cytochrome P-450 system to its active metabolite, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, which alkylates the target sites in susceptible cells in an all-or-none type reaction. As an alkylating agent, the mechanism of action of the active metabolites may involve cross-linking of DNA, which interferes with growth of normal and neoplastic cells.

The mechanism of action of cyclophosphamide in autoimmune diseases is thought to involve immunosuppression due to destruction of immune cells via DNA cross-linking.

In high doses, cyclophosphamide affects B cells by inhibiting clonal expansion and suppression of production of immunoglobulins. With long-term low-dose therapy, it affects T cell functions.

Cyclophosphamide has been successfully used in conditions that require immunosuppression. It is effective for frequently relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Cyclosporine (Sandimmune, Neoral, Gengraf)

Clinical Context:  Cyclosporine is a cyclic polypeptide that suppresses cell-mediated immune reactions. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has a similar effect.[52, 53]

For children and adults, base dosing on ideal body weight

Rituximab (Rituxan)

Clinical Context:  Rituximab is a chimeric humanized murine monoclonal antibody against CD20 antigen found on the surface of lymphocytes.

Class Summary

These agents regulate key steps of the immune system.

Mycophenolate (CellCept, Myfortic)

Clinical Context:  Mycophenolate inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase and suppresses de novo purine synthesis by lymphocytes, thereby inhibiting their proliferation. It inhibits antibody production.

Furosemide (Lasix)

Clinical Context:  Furosemide increases urine output by inhibiting sodium transport in the ascending loop of Henle . The dose must be individualized. Depending on response, administer at increments of 20-40 mg, no sooner than 6-8 h after the previous dose, until desired diuresis occurs.

Spironolactone (Aldactone)

Clinical Context:  Spironolactone is used for management of edema resulting from excessive aldosterone excretion. It competes with aldosterone for receptor sites in the distal nephron, thus enhancing sodium excretion.

Class Summary

These agents are used for symptomatic treatment of edema.

Captopril

Clinical Context:  Captopril inhibits angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), which blunts the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, resulting in less vasoconstriction and lower aldosterone secretion.

Enalapril (Vasotec)

Clinical Context:  Enalapril inhibits angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), which blunts the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, resulting in less vasoconstriction and lower aldosterone secretion.

Lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril)

Clinical Context:  Lisinopril inhibits angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), which blunts the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, resulting in less vasoconstriction and lower aldosterone secretion.

Class Summary

ACE inhibitors block conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II and prevent secretion of aldosterone from the adrenal cortex.

Valsartan (Diovan)

Clinical Context:  Valsartan directly antagonizes type 1 angiotensin II receptors. It displaces angiotensin II from the AT1 receptor and may lower blood pressure by antagonizing AT1-induced vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, catecholamine release, arginine vasopressin release, water intake, and hypertrophic responses. It does not affect bradykinin and is less likely to be associated with cough and angioedema. Valsartan is useful in patients who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors.

Losartan (Cozaar)

Clinical Context:  Losartan directly antagonizes type 1 angiotensin II receptors. It displaces angiotensin II from the AT1 receptor and may lower blood pressure by antagonizing AT1-induced vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, catecholamine release, arginine vasopressin release, water intake, and hypertrophic responses.  It does not affect bradykinin and is less likely to be associated with cough and angioedema. Valsartan is useful in patients who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors.

Class Summary

ARBs antagonize the action of angiotensin II at the type 1 receptor, reducing systemic arterial blood pressure and blunting the intrarenal effect of angiotensin II. If ACE inhibitors cause cough, ARBs may be substituted.

Corticotropin (HP Acthar Gel)

Clinical Context:  HP Acthar Gel is a synthetic corticotropin that stimulates corticotropin production. It may induce remission of proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome.

Class Summary

Consider use of corticotropin to induce diuresis or a remission of proteinuria.

What is nephrotic syndrome?What are the possible causes of nephrotic syndrome?Which populations are at risk for nephrotic syndrome?How is nephrotic syndrome classified?What causes primary nephrotic syndrome?Which disorders are secondary causes of nephrotic syndrome?How is steroid response used in the classification of nephrotic syndrome?How much albumin is passed daily into the urine of a healthy individual?How much albumin passes into urine in patients with tubular transport defects?What is the anatomy of the glomerular filtration barrier?What is congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type?Which glomerular structural changes may cause nephrotic syndrome?What is the difference between selective and nonselective proteinuria?What is the pathogenesis of edema in nephrotic syndrome?What is the underfill hypothesis of edema in nephrotic syndrome?What is the overfill hypothesis of edema in nephrotic syndrome?What are the metabolic consequences of nephrotic syndrome?What are the common infectious complications of nephrotic syndrome?What are the possible causes of increased infection risk in patients with nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of hyperlipidemia in nephrotic syndrome?Does nephrotic syndrome increase the risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease?Does nephrotic syndrome increase the risk for hypocalcemia?Does nephrotic syndrome increase the risk for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism?What is the pathophysiology of hypovolemia in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and what are its symptoms?What is the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy?What does nephrotic-range proteinuria during pregnancy indicate?What are the common causes of primary and secondary nephrotic syndrome?Which medications may cause nephrotic syndrome?Does membranous nephropathy increase the risk for cancer?What is the incidence of nephrotic syndrome in the US?Does nephrotic syndrome have a parasitic etiology?Which racial groups are most affected by nephrotic syndrome?Is nephrotic syndrome more common in males or females?Does the cause of nephrotic syndrome vary among different age groups?What is the prognosis of nephrotic syndrome?What is the prognosis of congenital nephrotic syndrome?What is the prognosis of focal glomerulosclerosis?What is the prognosis of minimal-change nephropathy?How often does remission of proteinuria occur in nephrotic syndrome?What is the prognosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome?What is the mortality rate for idiopathic membranous nephropathy?Which factors worsen the prognosis of membranous nephropathy?What is the prognosis of diabetic nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome?What is the prognosis of amyloidosis with nephrotic syndrome?How should patients be educated about nephrotic syndrome?What are the signs and symptoms of nephrotic syndrome?Which physical findings suggest nephrotic syndrome?How is heart failure differentiated from nephrotic syndrome?How is cirrhosis differentiated from nephrotic syndrome?What are the differential diagnoses for Nephrotic Syndrome?Which diagnostic studies should be performed for suspected nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of urinalysis in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of urine sediment exam in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of urinary protein measurement in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?When is a renal biopsy indicated in the diagnosis of childhood nephrotic syndrome?When is renal biopsy indicated in the diagnosis of adult nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2 R) antibody testing in the management of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of kidney function testing in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of serum albumin testing in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of serologic studies in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?Which histologic findings suggest nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome?What are the treatment options for nephrotic syndrome?How is minimal-change nephropathic syndrome treated in children?Is rituximab effective in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?Is ofatumumab an effective treatment for nephrotic syndrome in children?Is cyclosporine A effective in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome in children?How often and what duration should prednisone be administered for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children?What is the dosing approach to prednisolone in the treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children?How is congenital nephrotic syndrome treated?What is an effective treatment for minimal change nephropathy in adults?What is an effective treatment for lupus nephritis in adults?How is secondary amyloidosis with nephrotic syndrome treated in adults?How is membranous nephropathy treated in adults?Are specific diet and activity restrictions required in the management of nephrotic syndrome?When is hospitalization indicated for acute nephrotic syndrome in children?How is acute nephrotic syndrome treated in children?How is infection prevented in children with acute nephrotic syndrome?When is consultation with a specialist indicated in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome in children?How is acute nephrotic syndrome treated in adults?Is long-term monitoring of nephrotic syndrome required?What are the benefits of a low-sodium diet in patients with nephrotic syndrome?Which medications are used in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?Which medications are used to treat minimal-change nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of immunosuppressive medications in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?What is the role of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?When is cyclosporine indicated in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?Which medications are used to treat focal glomerulosclerosis?Which medications are used to treat idiopathic membranous nephropathy?What is the role of rituximab in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?When is corticotropin gel formulation (repository corticotropin injection) indicated in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Analogue are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Angiotensin II receptor antagonists are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Angiotensin-converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Diuretics are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Immunosuppressants are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Immunomodulators are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?Which medications in the drug class Corticosteroids are used in the treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome?

Author

Ramapriya Sinnakirouchenan, MD, MBBS, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin; Medical Director of Dialysis Unit, Fresenius Kidney Care

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Eleanor Lederer, MD, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Nephrology Division, Director, Nephrology Training Program, Director, Metabolic Stone Clinic, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Louisville Veterans Affairs Hospital

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: American Society of Nephrology<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Healthcare Quality Strategies, Inc<br/>Received grant/research funds from Dept of Veterans Affairs for research; Received salary from American Society of Nephrology for asn council position; Received salary from University of Louisville for employment; Received salary from University of Louisville Physicians for employment; Received contract payment from American Physician Institute for Advanced Professional Studies, LLC for independent contractor; Received contract payment from Healthcare Quality Strategies, Inc for independent cont.

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FASN, Huberwald Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Renal Section, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Cassiopia Lippold, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Pinnacle Health Hospitals

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Eric P Cohen, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Nephrology Section Chief, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Laura Lyngby Mulloy, DO, FACP, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Section of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation Medicine, Glover/Mealing Eminent Scholar Chair in Immunology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Tapia C, Bashir K. Nephrotic Syndrome. 2019 Jan. [View Abstract]
  2. Wu MY, Chen CS, Yiang GT, Cheng PW, Chen YL, Chiu HC, et al. The Emerging Role of Pathogenesis of IgA Nephropathy. J Clin Med. 2018 Aug 20. 7 (8):716-21. [View Abstract]
  3. Haraldsson B, Nyström J, Deen WM. Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol Rev. 2008 Apr. 88(2):451-87. [View Abstract]
  4. Russo LM, Bakris GL, Comper WD. Renal handling of albumin: a critical review of basic concepts and perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 May. 39(5):899-919. [View Abstract]
  5. Norden AG, Lapsley M, Lee PJ, Pusey CD, Scheinman SJ, Tam FW. Glomerular protein sieving and implications for renal failure in Fanconi syndrome. Kidney Int. 2001 Nov. 60(5):1885-92. [View Abstract]
  6. Hamm LL, Batuman V. Edema in the nephrotic syndrome: new aspect of an old enigma. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Dec. 14(12):3288-9. [View Abstract]
  7. Rostoker G, Behar A, Lagrue G. Vascular hyperpermeability in nephrotic edema. Nephron. 2000 Jul. 85(3):194-200. [View Abstract]
  8. Appel GB, Blum CB, Chien S, Kunis CL, Appel AS. The hyperlipidemia of the nephrotic syndrome. Relation to plasma albumin concentration, oncotic pressure, and viscosity. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 13. 312(24):1544-8. [View Abstract]
  9. Curry RC Jr, Roberts WC. Status of the coronary arteries in the nephrotic syndrome. Analysis of 20 necropsy patients aged 15 to 35 years to determine if coronary atherosclerosis is accelerated. Am J Med. 1977 Aug. 63(2):183-92. [View Abstract]
  10. Mittal SK, Dash SC, Tiwari SC, Agarwal SK, Saxena S, Fishbane S. Bone histology in patients with nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function. Kidney Int. 1999 May. 55(5):1912-9. [View Abstract]
  11. Tessitore N, Bonucci E, D'Angelo A, Lund B, Corgnati A, Lund B, et al. Bone histology and calcium metabolism in patients with nephrotic syndrome and normal or reduced renal function. Nephron. 1984. 37(3):153-9. [View Abstract]
  12. Gulati S, Godbole M, Singh U, Gulati K, Srivastava A. Are children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at risk for metabolic bone disease?. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jun. 41(6):1163-9. [View Abstract]
  13. Leonard MB, Feldman HI, Shults J, Zemel BS, Foster BJ, Stallings VA. Long-term, high-dose glucocorticoids and bone mineral content in childhood glucocorticoid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 26. 351(9):868-75. [View Abstract]
  14. Mahmoodi BK, ten Kate MK, Waanders F, Veeger NJ, Brouwer JL, Vogt L. High absolute risks and predictors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with nephrotic syndrome: results from a large retrospective cohort study. Circulation. 2008 Jan 15. 117(2):224-30. [View Abstract]
  15. Rood IM, Deegens JKJ, Lugtenberg D, Bongers EMHF, Wetzels JFM. Nephrotic Syndrome With Mutations in NPHS2: The Role of R229Q and Implications for Genetic Counseling. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Sep 18. [View Abstract]
  16. Glassock RJ. Antiphospholipase A2 receptor autoantibody guided diagnosis and treatment of membranous nephropathy: a new personalized medical approach. Clin J Amer Soc Nephrol. 2014. 9:1341-3. [View Abstract]
  17. Hunley TE, Corzo D, Dudek M, Kishnani P, Amalfitano A, Chen YT, et al. Nephrotic syndrome complicating alpha-glucosidase replacement therapy for Pompe disease. Pediatrics. 2004. 114:e532-5. [View Abstract]
  18. Lathara Z, Ambruzs JM, Cohen EP. Alloimmune Membranous Nephropathy in Fabry Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol Abstract Supplement. 2015. SA-PO004.
  19. George BA, Zhou XJ, Toto R. Nephrotic syndrome after bevacizumab: case report and literature review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Feb. 49(2):e23-9. [View Abstract]
  20. Lefaucheur C, Stengel B, Nochy D, et al. Membranous nephropathy and cancer: Epidemiologic evidence and determinants of high-risk cancer association. Kidney Int. 2006 Oct. 70(8):1510-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Wong W. Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in New Zealand children, demographic, clinical features, initial management and outcome after twelve-month follow-up: results of a three-year national surveillance study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 May. 43(5):337-41. [View Abstract]
  22. Kumar J, Gulati S, Sharma AP, Sharma RK, Gupta RK. Histopathological spectrum of childhood nephrotic syndrome in Indian children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Jul. 18(7):657-60. [View Abstract]
  23. Ozkaya N, Cakar N, Ekim M, Kara N, Akkök N, Yalçinkaya F. Primary nephrotic syndrome during childhood in Turkey. Pediatr Int. 2004 Aug. 46(4):436-8. [View Abstract]
  24. Kazi JI, Mubarak M. Pattern of glomerulonephritides in adult nephrotic patients--report from SIUT. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Nov. 57(11):574. [View Abstract]
  25. Barsoum R. The changing face of schistosomal glomerulopathy. Kidney Int. 2004. 66:2472-2484.
  26. Doe JY, Funk M, Mengel M, et al. Nephrotic syndrome in African children: lack of evidence for 'tropical nephrotic syndrome'?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006. 21:672-676.
  27. Pakasa NM, Sumaili EK. The nephrotic syndrome in the Democratic Republic of Congo. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9. 354(10):1085-6. [View Abstract]
  28. Sumaili EK, Krzesinski JM, Zinga CV, Cohen EP, Delanaye P, Munyanga SM, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Kinshasa: results of a pilot study from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jan. 24(1):117-22. [View Abstract]
  29. Fine DM, Wasser WG, Estrella MM, Atta MG, Kuperman M, Shemer R, et al. APOL1 risk variants predict histopathology and progression to ESRD in HIV-related kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012. 23:343-50. [View Abstract]
  30. Bonilla-Felix M, Parra C, Dajani T, Ferris M, Swinford RD, Portman RJ. Changing patterns in the histopathology of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. Kidney Int. 1999 May. 55(5):1885-90. [View Abstract]
  31. Arneil GC, Lam CN. Long-term assessment of steroid therapy in childhood nephrosis. Lancet. 1966 Oct 15. 2(7468):819-21. [View Abstract]
  32. Gipson DS, Troost JP, Lafayette RA, et al. Complete Remission in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. 11:81-9. [View Abstract]
  33. Beins NT, Dell KM. Long-Term Outcomes in Children with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome Treated with Calcineurin Inhibitors. Front Pediatr. 2015. 3:104. [View Abstract]
  34. Harrison P. MENTOR: Rituximab Is a Winner in Membranous Nephropathy. Medscape Medical News. Available at https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/915207. July 3, 2019; Accessed: July 9, 2019.
  35. Donadio JV Jr, Torres VE, Velosa JA, Wagoner RD, Holley KE, Okamura M. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: the natural history of untreated patients. Kidney Int. 1988 Mar. 33(3):708-15. [View Abstract]
  36. Jude EB, Anderson SG, Cruickshank JK, et al. Natural history and prognostic factors of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. Quart J Med. 2002. 95:371-7. [View Abstract]
  37. Varghese SA, Powell TB, Budisavljevic MN, et al. Urine biomarkers predict the cause of glomerular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. 18:913-22. [View Abstract]
  38. Cohen EP, Lemann J. The role of the laboratory in evaluation of kidney function. Clin Chem. 1991. 37:785-796.
  39. Gupta K, Iskandar SS, Daeihagh P, et al. Distribution of pathologic findings in individuals with nephrotic proteinuria according to serum albumin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 May. 23(5):1595-9. [View Abstract]
  40. Beck LH Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeau G, et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2. 361(1):11-21. [View Abstract]
  41. Hofstra JM, Beck LH Jr, Beck DM, Wetzels JF, Salant DJ. Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies correlate with clinical status in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jun. 6(6):1286-91. [View Abstract]
  42. [Guideline] Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis. Kidney International. Available at http://www.kdigo.org/clinical_practice_guidelines/pdf/KDIGO-GN-Guideline.pdf. June 2012; Accessed: December 14, 2018.
  43. Palmer SC, Nand K, Strippoli GF. Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23. CD001537. [View Abstract]
  44. Vaziri ND. Disorders of lipid metabolism in nephrotic syndrome: mechanisms and consequences. Kidney Int. 2016 Jul. 90 (1):41-52. [View Abstract]
  45. Agrawal S, Zaritsky JJ, Fornoni A, Smoyer WE. Dyslipidaemia in nephrotic syndrome: mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Jan. 14 (1):57-70. [View Abstract]
  46. Kallash M, Smoyer WE, Mahan JD. Rituximab Use in the Management of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome. Front Pediatr. 2019. 7:178. [View Abstract]
  47. Mühlig AK, Lee JY, Kemper MJ, Kronbichler A, Yang JW, Lee JM, et al. Levamisole in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Clinical Efficacy and Pathophysiological Aspects. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 16. 8 (6):[View Abstract]
  48. Sinha A, Puraswani M, Kalaivani M, Goyal P, Hari P, Bagga A. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int. 2019 Jan. 95 (1):210-218. [View Abstract]
  49. Ravani P, Bonanni A, Rossi R, Caridi G, Ghiggeri GM. Anti-CD20 Antibodies for Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome in Children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Nov 19. 160 (5 Pt 1):1062-7. [View Abstract]
  50. Ruggenenti P, et al; Rituximab in Nephrotic Syndrome of Steroid-Dependent or Frequently Relapsing Minimal Change Disease Or Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (NEMO) Study Group. Rituximab in steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Apr. 25 (4):850-63. [View Abstract]
  51. Maxted AP, Dalrymple RA, Chisholm D, McColl J, Tse Y, Christian MT, et al. Low-dose rituximab is no less effective for nephrotic syndrome measured by 12-month outcome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 May. 34 (5):855-863. [View Abstract]
  52. Bonanni A, Rossi R, Murtas C, Ghiggeri GM. Low-dose ofatumumab for rituximab-resistant nephrotic syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Sep 16. 2015:[View Abstract]
  53. Hibino S, Uemura O, Nagai T, Yamakawa S, Iwata N, Ito H, et al. Three year outcome of childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome under a unified immunosuppressive protocol. Pediatr Int. 2014 Sep 15. [View Abstract]
  54. Hahn D, Hodson EM, Willis NS, Craig JC. Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 18. CD001533. [View Abstract]
  55. Yadav M, Sinha A, Khandelwal P, Hari P, Bagga A. Efficacy of low-dose daily versus alternate-day prednisolone in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Sep 7. 6 (1):63-9. [View Abstract]
  56. Dufek S, Holtta T, Trautmann A, et al. Management of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome: challenging treatment paradigms. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jun 21. [View Abstract]
  57. Waldman M, Crew RJ, Valeri A, Busch J, Stokes B, Markowitz G, et al. Adult minimal-change disease: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 May. 2(3):445-53. [View Abstract]
  58. du Buf-Vereijken PW, Branten AJ, Wetzels JF. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: outline and rationale of a treatment strategy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec. 46(6):1012-29. [View Abstract]
  59. Fervenza FC, et al; MENTOR Investigators. Rituximab or Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4. 381 (1):36-46. [View Abstract]
  60. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. General recommendations on immunization --- recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011 Jan 28. 60 (2):1-64. [View Abstract]
  61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults with immunocompromising conditions: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Oct 12. 61 (40):816-9. [View Abstract]
  62. Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Broder KR, Olsen SJ, Karron RA, Jernigan DB, et al. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Aug 26. 65 (5):1-54. [View Abstract]
  63. Cohen JI. Strategies for herpes zoster vaccination of immunocompromised patients. J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1. 197 Suppl 2:S237-41. [View Abstract]
  64. Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, Krishnamoorthy P, Mandelcorn ED, Leigh R, et al. A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 15. 9 (1):30. [View Abstract]
  65. Chen Y, Schieppati A, Chen X, Cai G, Zamora J, Giuliano GA, et al. Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16. 10:CD004293. [View Abstract]
  66. Gulati A, Sinha A, Jordan SC, Hari P, Dinda AK, Sharma S, et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab for difficult steroid-resistant and -dependent nephrotic syndrome: multicentric report. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec. 5(12):2207-12. [View Abstract]
  67. Bomback AS, Tumlin JA, Baranski J, et al. Treatment of nephrotic syndrome with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) gel. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011 Mar 14. 5:147-53. [View Abstract]
  68. Bomback AS, Canetta PA, Beck LH Jr, Ayalon R, Radhakrishnan J, Appel GB. Treatment of resistant glomerular diseases with adrenocorticotropic hormone gel: a prospective trial. Am J Nephrol. 2012. 36(1):58-67. [View Abstract]
  69. Chen M, Li H, Li XY, et al. Tacrolimus Combined With Corticosteroids in Treatment of Nephrotic Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Med Sci. 2010 Mar. 339(3):233-8. [View Abstract]
  70. Roberti I, Vyas S. Long-term outcome of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome treated with tacrolimus. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Mar 9. [View Abstract]
  71. Rood IM, Deegens JKJ, Lugtenberg D, Bongers EMHF, Wetzels JFM. Nephrotic Syndrome With Mutations in NPHS2: The Role of R229Q and Implications for Genetic Counseling. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Sep 18. [View Abstract]

Schematic drawing of the glomerular barrier. Podo = podocytes; GBM = glomerular basement membrane; Endo = fenestrated endothelial cells; ESL = endothelial cell surface layer (often referred to as the glycocalyx). Primary urine is formed through the filtration of plasma fluid across the glomerular barrier (arrows); in humans, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is 125 mL/min. The plasma flow rate (Qp) is close to 700 mL/min, with the filtration fraction being 20%. The concentration of albumin in serum is 40 g/L, while the estimated concentration of albumin in primary urine is 4 mg/L, or 0.1% of its concentration in plasma. Courtesy of the American Physiological Society (www.the-aps.org) and reproduced from Haraldsson B, Nystrom J, Deen WM. Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol Rev. 2008 Apr;88(2):451-87.

Forces determining capillary filtration

Incidence of important causes of nephrotic syndrome, in number per million population. The left panel shows systemic causes, and the right panel lists primary renal diseases that can cause nephrotic syndrome. fgs = focal glomerulosclerosis, MN = membranous nephropathy, min change = minimal-change nephropathy. Data are in part from Swaminathan et al and Bergesio et al.

A schema of the average patient age at presentation in various common forms of nephrotic syndrome. (Timeline not to scale.)

Schematic drawing of the glomerular barrier. Podo = podocytes; GBM = glomerular basement membrane; Endo = fenestrated endothelial cells; ESL = endothelial cell surface layer (often referred to as the glycocalyx). Primary urine is formed through the filtration of plasma fluid across the glomerular barrier (arrows); in humans, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is 125 mL/min. The plasma flow rate (Qp) is close to 700 mL/min, with the filtration fraction being 20%. The concentration of albumin in serum is 40 g/L, while the estimated concentration of albumin in primary urine is 4 mg/L, or 0.1% of its concentration in plasma. Courtesy of the American Physiological Society (www.the-aps.org) and reproduced from Haraldsson B, Nystrom J, Deen WM. Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol Rev. 2008 Apr;88(2):451-87.

Incidence of important causes of nephrotic syndrome, in number per million population. The left panel shows systemic causes, and the right panel lists primary renal diseases that can cause nephrotic syndrome. fgs = focal glomerulosclerosis, MN = membranous nephropathy, min change = minimal-change nephropathy. Data are in part from Swaminathan et al and Bergesio et al.

A schema of the average patient age at presentation in various common forms of nephrotic syndrome. (Timeline not to scale.)

Forces determining capillary filtration