Small Cell Lung Cancer



Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), previously known as oat cell carcinoma, is considered distinct from other lung cancers, which are called non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) because of their clinical and biologic characteristics. See the image below.

View Image

High-power photomicrograph of small cell carcinoma on the left side of the image with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium on the right side of the ....

See Small Cell Lung Cancer: Beating the Spread, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify the key clinical and biologic characteristics of small cell lung cancer, the staging criteria, and the common sites of spread.

Also, see the Clinical Presentations of Lung Cancer: Slideshow and Lung Cancer Staging -- Radiologic Options slideshows for additional information on SCLC staging and treatment.

SCLC is an aggressive subtype of lung cancer. Without treatment, in a few weeks it could be fatal. It is important to determine if the cancer is limited or at an extensive stage. Limited-stage cancer is treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Extensive-stage cancer is treated with chemotherapy alone.

SCLC is a neuroendocrine carcinoma that exhibits aggressive behavior, rapid growth, early spread to distant sites, exquisite sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation, and frequent association with distinct paraneoplastic syndromes, including hypercalcemia, Eaton-lambert syndrome, syndrome of inappropriate diuretic hormone, and many others. (See Pathophysiology, Etiology, and Presentation.)[1, 2, 3]


Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) arises in peribronchial locations and infiltrates the bronchial submucosa. Widespread metastases occur early in the course of the disease, with common spread to the mediastinal lymph nodes, liver, bones, adrenal glands, and brain.

In addition, production of various peptide hormones leads to a wide range of paraneoplastic syndromes; the most common of these are the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) and the syndrome of ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) production. Moreover, autoimmune phenomena may lead to various neurologic syndromes, such as Lambert-Eaton syndrome.


The predominant cause of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (and non-SCLC) is tobacco smoking. Of all histologic types of lung cancer, SCLC and squamous cell carcinoma have the strongest correlation to tobacco.[4, 5] Approximately 98% of patients with SCLC have a smoking history. Patients with SCLC should be encouraged to stop smoking, as smoking cessation is associated with improved survival.[6]

All types of lung cancer occur with increased frequency in uranium miners, but SCLC is the most common. The incidence of lung cancer is increased further in these individuals if they also smoke tobacco.

Exposure to radon, an inert gas that is a product of uranium decay, has also been reported to cause SCLC.


Occurrence in the United States

Lung cancer is the second most common malignancy in both sexes in the United States, exceeded in frequency only by prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] Although less than half as many new cases of lung cancer than breast cancer are diagnosed in US women each year, almost twice as many US women die of lung cancer each year than from breast cancer.

The incidence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has declined over the last few years.[8, 11, 12] SCLC once accounted for 20-25% of all newly diagnosed lung cancers; it now comprises only about 15% of all lung cancers.[13]

For 2015, the estimates for lung cancer overall are 221,200 new cases and 158,040 deaths in the United States.[14]

International occurrence

Globally, lung cancer is the most frequent malignancy in men (in Europe, lung cancer is second only to prostate cancer[15] ) and the fifth most common cancer in women. Although the incidence of lung cancer has been falling in the US, it is increasing at a staggering pace in developing countries due to the rising prevalence of tobacco use. According to World Health Organization (WHO) statistics, about 1.59 million deaths from lung cancer occur annually throughout the world.[16]

Separate worldwide data for small cell carcinoma are not available. The incidence of lung cancer started to decline among males in the early 1980s and has continued to do so over the past 20 years. In contrast, the incidence in women started to increase in the late 1970s and has only recently reached a plateau.[7, 11, 12, 17]

Age-related demographics

As with other histopathologic types of lung cancer, most cases of SCLC occur in individuals aged 60-80 years.


Approximately 60-70% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have clinically disseminated or extensive disease at presentation. Extensive-stage SCLC is incurable. When given combination chemotherapy, patients with extensive-stage disease have a complete response rate of more than 20% and a median survival longer than 7 months; however, only 2% are alive at 5 years.[18] For individuals with limited-stage disease that is treated with combination chemotherapy plus chest radiation, a complete response rate of 80% and survival of 17 months have been reported; 12-15% of patients are alive at 5 years.[19]

Indicators of poor prognosis include relapsed disease, weight loss of greater than 10% of baseline body weight, and poor performance status. For all patients with SCLC, activity should be encouraged and a dietary consultation should be obtained.

Patient Education

Because tobacco smoking is the predominant cause of lung cancer, the only means of decreasing the incidence of this disease overall, as well as that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) specifically, is to decrease the prevalence of smoking. The evidence is clear that the declining incidence of lung cancer in men in the United States has coincided with a decrease in smoking among males.

Concerted efforts are required from government, public health agencies, and healthcare providers to increase public awareness of the hazards of smoking, devise tougher laws to restrict teen smoking, and restrict smoking in public places.

For patient education information, see the Cancer Center, as well as Lung Cancer and Bronchoscopy. In addition, see the National Cancer Institute's General Information About Small Cell Lung Cancer.


Fewer than 5% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are asymptomatic at presentation. Common presenting signs and symptoms of the disease include the following:

Most patients with this disease present with a short duration of symptoms, usually only 8-12 weeks before presentation. The clinical manifestations of SCLC can result from local tumor growth, intrathoracic spread, distant spread, and/or paraneoplastic syndromes.

Local tumor growth

Small cell carcinomas are usually centrally located and may cause irritation and/or obstruction of the major airways. Common symptoms resulting from local tumor growth include cough, dyspnea, and hemoptysis. Squamous cell cancer also presents as a central lesion, but unlike small cell carcinoma, it frequently exhibits central cavitation.

Rapid tumor growth may lead to obstruction of major airways, with distal collapse leading to postobstructive pneumonitis, infection, and fever.

Intrathoracic spread

Small cell carcinomas usually grow rapidly and metastasize to mediastinal lymph nodes relatively early in the course of the disease. At presentation, patients may have very large intrathoracic tumors, and distinguishing the primary tumor from lymph node metastases may be impossible.

Pressure on mediastinal structures can cause various symptoms, including the following:

SCLC causes SVC obstruction more often than non-SCLC (NSCLC). Patients present with swelling of the face and upper extremities, and can develop stridor due to laryngeal edema or headache, dizziness, and other neurologic symptoms due to cerebral edema. Hoarseness of recent onset can be caused by compression of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a mediastinal mass involving the aortopulmonary window (ie, primary tumor or lymph node metastasis).

Compression of the phrenic nerve causes paralysis of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm, contributing to shortness of breath. In addition, esophageal compression can lead to dysphagia and odynophagia, and compression of the mainstem bronchi and trachea can cause severe shortness of breath and stridor or wheezing.

Symptoms from distant spread

Common sites of hematogenous metastases include the brain, bones, liver, adrenal glands, and bone marrow. The symptoms depend upon the site of spread.

Neurologic dysfunction can occur due to brain metastases or spinal cord compression. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases may have raised intracranial pressure secondary to mass lesions and vasogenic edema. Common symptoms include the following:

Suspected spinal cord compression is an oncologic emergency. Early recognition of vertebral and paraspinal metastases is important, because a delay in diagnosis and treatment frequently results in permanent loss of neurologic function. The initial symptom is usually back pain, with or without neurologic dysfunction. Once present, neurologic dysfunction can progress very rapidly (ie, within hours) to cause quadriplegia or paraplegia, depending upon the location of the lesion.

Other symptoms from distant metastasis may include pain from bone metastasis, as well as jaundice or abdominal/right upper quadrant pain due to liver metastasis.

Paraneoplastic syndromes

Paraneoplastic syndromes are rare disorders that are triggered by an altered immune system response to a neoplasm or ectopic production of a hormone or cytokine. Table 1, below, shows some examples of the paraneoplastic syndromes affecting the endocrine and neurologic systems in patients with SCLC.

See the Medscape Drugs & Diseases topic Paraneoplastic Diseases for more information.

Table 1. Paraneoplastic Syndromes Affecting Endocrine and Neurologic Function in SCLC

View Table

See Table

Physical Examination

Physical findings in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) depend upon the extent of local and distant spread and the organ system involved.

Respiratory system

Patients usually experience shortness of breath; physical examination may reveal use of the accessory muscles of respiration (scalene muscles, intercostal muscles) and flaring of the nasal alae. In addition, by virtue of a central tumor location, patients may develop distal atelectasis and postobstructive pneumonia. With pleural effusion, the examination reveals dullness to percussion and decreased or absent breath sounds on the side of the effusion.

Cardiovascular system

Pericardial effusions may be asymptomatic when small, or they may result in tamponade if they are large or accumulate over a short period. Patients are usually short of breath and their heart sounds may be distant on auscultation. Jugular venous pulsation is elevated, and, paradoxically, it rises with inspiration.

Tamponade is an emergency and requires immediate decompression of the pericardium. Pulsus paradoxus is a classic sign of pericardial tamponade. If tamponade is suspected, an echocardiogram should be performed. The definitive diagnosis is established with cardiac catheterization, which reveals equalization of pressures in cardiac chambers. Definitive management may include chemotherapy and/or surgical creation of a pleuropericardial window.

Examination of the extremities may reveal clubbing, cyanosis, or edema. In the presence of superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction, the right upper extremity is usually edematous.

Central nervous system

Asymptomatic brain metastases occur in 5-10% of patients with SCLC (see Workup). Patients with symptomatic brain metastases may have raised intracranial pressure secondary to mass lesions and surrounding brain edema. The physical findings depend on the site of the brain lesions.

Perform funduscopy to look for signs of raised intracranial pressure, as well as a thorough neurologic examination and an evaluation of cerebellar function, coordination, and gait.

Gastrointestinal system

The liver is a common site of metastatic spread. Physical examination may reveal icterus (secondary to widespread liver metastasis or obstruction of biliary outflow) and/or hepatomegaly. However, most patients do not have any specific finding related to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract on examination.

Lymphatic system

Carefully perform a lymph node examination. Currently, enlarged ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes are included in limited-stage disease, but enlarged axillary lymph nodes upstage the diagnosis to extensive-stage disease.

Staging Overview

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is staged by stage type and staging system.

Types of staging

The American Cancer Society (ACS) uses 2 types of staging—clinical and pathologic—for SCLC.[23] Clinical staging involves physical examination, biopsy examinations, and imaging scans; the majority of patients are staged with clinical staging, and this type of staging is usually used to describe SCLC tumor extent.

Pathologic staging is generally more accurate, as it includes clinical staging and adds postsurgical findings. Occasionally, findings between the 2 stages may be different, such as during procedures in which cancer is in an area that is not seen on radiologic studies. The surgical findings may give the cancer a more advanced pathologic stage.[23]

Staging systems

VALSG 2-stage system

The staging system most commonly used for SCLC is the Veterans Administration Lung Group (VALSG) 2-stage system, which defines limited-stage and extensive-stage disease.[24] Patients with disease confined to one hemithorax, with or without involvement of the mediastinal, contralateral hilar or ipsilateral supraclavicular, or scalene lymph nodes are considered to have limited-stage disease, whereas those with disease involvement at any other location are considered to have extensive-stage disease.[24]

The key factor in defining limited-stage disease is the ability to encompass all of the disease within 1 tolerably safe radiation therapy port.

TNM system

Almost all solid tumors, including lung carcinomas, are staged using the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system, because it provides important prognostic information and is used to design management plans. However, older literature has stated that the TNM system fails to provide important prognostic information in patients with SCLC and is useful only for the few patients (< 5%) who might be eligible for surgical resection.

IASLC TNM system

The International Association of the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) developed a new TNM staging system for lung cancer in 2007; this staging system included non-SCLC (NSCLC) and SCLC.[25]

The American Joint Commission for Cancer (AJCC) adopted the new TNM system in 2010.[26] In addition, the 2011 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guideline for SCLC incorporated TNM staging into its diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms; the NCCN suggested that researchers begin to use the TNM staging system in an effort to more accurately assess prognoses and to more specifically personalize therapeutic options. This recommendation is also reflected in the 2013 NCCN guidelines.[25]

For more details, see VALSG and TNM Staging under Workup.

Approach Considerations

Lung cancer screening

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) have issued similar guidelines on lung cancer screening.[14, 28]  The USPSTF recommends annual screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in adults 55 to 80 years of age who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. The USPSTF recommends that screening be discontinued once a person has not smoked for 15 years or develops a health problem that substantially limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to have curative lung surgery.[28]

The ACS recommends LDCT screening in apparently healthy patients 55-74 years of age who have at least a 30 pack-year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. The ACS stresses that the decision to initiate lung cancer screening should be shared between the clinician and patient and should involve discussion of the potential benefits, limitations, and harms associated with such screening.[14]

Initial workup

A thorough history and physical examination usually provide clues to the organ systems involved in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and these are used to guide further workup (see Presentation). Investigations are performed to delineate the extent of disease and to assess organ function before therapy begins. In general, depending on tumor localization, biopsies from the primary tumor should be obtained using bronchoscopy or any of the following techniques[15] :

A metastatic lesion, if easily and safely accessible, may be the preferred option for a biopsy specimen; this will also provide pathological staging.[15]

Staging workup

The purpose of a staging workup for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is to determine the prognosis and management of this disease. Patients with limited-stage disease are usually treated with combined chemoradiotherapy, whereas those with extensive-stage disease are usually treated with chemotherapy alone. Staging workup of SCLC is as follows[25, 29, 15] :

Staging should be adequate before making the diagnosis of limited-stage SCLC. Any pleural effusion should be tested cytologically for malignant cells, and isolated liver or adrenal lesions should be sampled by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) before a diagnosis of limited-stage disease is made. Some authorities suggest a bone marrow examination in the absence of any other evidence of spread.

See Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging for summary tables.

See Lung Cancer Staging -- Radiologic Options, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify stages of the disease process.

Routine Laboratory Studies

A complete blood cell count (CBC) with differential, serum electrolyte levels, renal function studies, and liver function tests (LFTs) are all part of the routine staging workup, and in some cases, these studies may reveal the sites of metastasis (eg, elevated serum calcium and/or alkaline phosphatase [ALP] levels with bone metastasis). These tests are also important to assess organ function before starting therapy.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and sodium levels also provide prognostic information. Increased uric acid levels and impaired renal function may indicate the possibility of rapid tumor lysis syndrome with therapy.

Complete blood cell count

In 5-10% of patients, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) may have spread to bone marrow at presentation. Bone marrow examination is not routinely performed in SCLC unless abnormalities are identified in the CBC or peripheral smear examination, raising the possibility of bone marrow spread. These abnormalities may include cytopenia or the presence of immature white and red blood cells (a leukoerythroblastic blood picture), which raises the possibility of myelophthisic anemia.

Additionally, before instituting initial full-dose combination chemotherapy, the CBC should demonstrate the following:

Serum chemistries

The presence of elevated serum calcium and ALP levels raises the suspicion of bone metastasis, and in such cases a bone scan should be ordered even in the absence of symptoms. Serum electrolytes should be obtained to look for paraneoplastic syndromes, such as syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion. The presence of hyponatremia is considered an adverse prognostic indicator.

Elevated serum LDH indicates an increased tumor mass and high cell turnover; this finding is also an adverse prognostic indicator. Abnormal liver function findings raise the possibility of hepatic metastasis and may require adjustments to planned therapy.

Thoracic Imaging Studies


Good posteroanterior and lateral radiographs are useful in identifying the primary tumor, as well as concurrent parenchymal abnormalities. Mediastinal widening may indicate mediastinal lymph node involvement.

CT scanning

Computed tomography (CT) scanning of all common sites of metastasis should be performed to stage the disease adequately. Evaluation via CT scanning of the thorax (lungs and mediastinum) and commonly involved abdominal viscera (ie, liver, adrenals) is the minimum requirement in standard staging workup of SCLC. Intravenous contrast agents should be used whenever possible.[25] In the United States, CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen to include the liver and adrenal glands are standard.

Brain and Spinal Cord Imaging Studies

Brain metastasis may be present in as many as 10-15% of patients at diagnosis[25] and may be occult in 5% of patients. Consequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain should be ordered in asymptomatic patients and in those with neurologic symptoms.[25] Because MRI is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) scanning with contrast for detection of brain metastasis, MRI is used as the first-line imaging study in many institutions.

MRI has an increased ability to detect disease in proximity to neurovascular structures and is also considered standard in the workup of patients in whom spinal cord compression is suspected. Although a CT myelogram can establish the diagnosis of vertebral and paraspinal metastases, it is currently rarely used. MRI is noninvasive and very sensitive in establishing the diagnosis in almost all cases.

Skeletal Radionuclide Imaging

Bone is a common site of metastasis for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A radionuclide bone scan should therefore be obtained to identify bone metastases.

Bone metastases from SCLC usually contain both osteolytic and osteoblastic components, and a bone scan is superior to plain radiographs in detecting osteoblastic lesions. However, because some benign lesions can also cause abnormalities on bone scans, obtaining plain radiographs of abnormal areas for radiographic correlation is important, particularly in weight-bearing bones at risk for fracture.

Bone scans should be obtained in all patients with SCLC at diagnosis or during follow-up if new bone symptoms develop or if the serum calcium or alkaline phosphatase level is elevated.

PET Scanning

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning (see the image below) remains under evaluation for the staging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).[30, 31] The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) does not recommend PET scanning in the routine staging of SCLC, although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend combined PET-CT (computed tomography) scanning if limited-stage disease or metastasis is suspected.[25] PET-CT imaging is superior to PET scanning alone. (PET scanning is inferior to MRI or CT scanning for the detection of brain metastases.)

View Image

This coronal positron emission tomogram shows a large, focal, hypermetabolic area on the right that is consistent with a large mass in the central por....

In small, uncontrolled studies, PET scanning has shown good accuracy (83-99%) in staging extensive- versus limited-stage SCLC.[30] Although PET scanning may improve the accuracy of staging, however, any lesion identified using this modality that would alter staging requires pathologic confirmation due to the possibility of a false-positive finding.[25] The full role of PET imaging in this setting remains to be determined.[30, 31]

Bronchoscopy and FNA

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is usually centrally located and can be approached easily with a bronchoscope. The advantage of endoscopy is direct visualization of the tumor, allowing for direct biopsy as well as cytologic examination of bronchial washings.

For tumors that cannot be diagnosed with transbronchial biopsy, transthoracic percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) carried out under computed tomography (CT) ̶ scan guidance is a reasonable alternative.

Sputum Cytology

Sputum cytology is a noninvasive test and, if positive, can provide an accurate diagnosis of central lung cancers. Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) usually presents as a large, central tumor, tumor cells frequently involve the submucosal layer of the bronchus with little or no exophytic endobronchial extension. Therefore, sputum cytology is not as useful for diagnosing SCLC as it is for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma.


In small cell lung cancer (SCLC), the presence of malignant pleural effusion upstages the disease to extensive-stage SCLC. For adequate staging, pleural effusions should be aspirated and examined for malignant cells if no other sites of distant spread are identified.

If a large, symptomatic pleural effusion is present, therapeutic thoracentesis provides symptomatic relief. In patients with resistant, relapsed, or nonresponding disease, thoracentesis can be combined with pleurodesis to prevent recurrence of symptomatic effusions. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) reported similar outcomes in patients undergoing pleurodesis via use of talc slurry or poudrage.[32] The currently preferred agent for pleurodesis is sterilized talc, which can be instilled either as a slurry or as a powder during pleuroscopy.

Histologic Findings

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically centrally located, arising in peribronchial locations. These tumors are thought to develop from neuroendocrine Kulchitsky cells and are composed of sheets of small, round to spindled cells with dark nuclei, scant cytoplasm, and fine, granular (“salt and pepper”) nuclear chromatin with indistinct nucleoli. (See the image below.)[33]

View Image

High-power photomicrograph of small cell carcinoma on the left side of the image with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium on the right side of the ....

Very high rates of cell division are observed, and necrosis, sometimes extensive, may be seen. Because of the central location, the tumor cells may exfoliate into sputum and bronchial washings. Crush artifact of the relatively fragile tumor cells is a common finding in small biopsies, but this feature is not considered diagnostic in and of itself.

Neurosecretory granules can be identified with the aid of electron microscopy. The neuroendocrine nature of the neoplasm is suggested by its frequent association with neurologic and endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes.

Immunohistochemical stains for chromogranin, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, and synaptophysin are usually positive, but these are not an absolute requirement for the diagnosis.

Approximately 5% of SCLCs exhibit features of mixed small cell and non-small cell components, suggesting phenotypic plasticity and lending support to the cancer stem cell hypothesis. Patients with mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology are managed according to the same guidelines as those for patients with SCLC.[25]

VALSG and TNM Staging

VALSG staging system

The Veterans Administration Lung Group (VALSG) staged small cell lung cancer (SCLC) into limited- and extensive-stage disease to distinguish between patients who may benefit from more aggressive, potentially curative treatments, such as chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy (limited-stage SCLC), and those individuals whose cancer is not likely to be cured with such therapy (extensive-stage SCLC).[25, 23]

Limited-stage disease is confined not only to the ipsilateral hemithorax but also to an area that is small enough to be treated with radiation therapy in 1 tolerably safe radiation treatment port.[25, 23]

AJCC staging system

Under the new tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system, from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (see tables 2 and 3, below), limited-stage SCLC is defined as any T, any N, M0; the exception is T3-4, owing to multiple lung nodules that extend beyond a single radiation field.[25]

Extensive-stage disease describes tumors that extend beyond the ipsilateral hemithorax, such as those that reach the contralateral lung and/or contralateral lymph nodes or that find their way to distant organs (eg, bone marrow).[25, 23] Approximately two thirds of patients with SCLC present with extensive-stage disease at diagnosis.[23] The new TNM staging system classifies extensive-stage disease as any T, any N, M1a/b, and T3-4, due to involvement of multiple lung nodules.[25]

Table 2, below, summarizes the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) lung cancer TNM staging system categories, and Table 3, below, summarizes the lung cancer stage groupings.[26] The TNM assignments define the cancer growth and disease extent, and the stage groupings combine cancers with a similar prognosis.[25] Generally, lower stage numbers result in a better prognosis.[25]

Table 2. AJCC TNM Categories for Lung Cancer

View Table

See Table

Table 3. AJCC Stage Groupings for Lung Cancer

View Table

See Table

Approach Considerations

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid growth and early dissemination. For the approximately 30% of patients with SCLC who have limited-stage disease at the time of diagnosis (ie, tumors confined to the hemithorax of origin, the mediastinum, or the supraclavicular lymph nodes), management typically involves combination platinum-based chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy given with curative intent. Patients who achieve a complete or partial response should be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).[13]

Extensive-stage SCLC (ie, SCLC that has spread beyond the supraclavicular areas, or with distant metastases) remains incurable with current management options, and patients are treated with combination chemotherapy. Several chemotherapy combinations are active in SCLC, but usually a platinum-containing regimen is chosen. However, despite strides in the management of SCLC, there has been little change in survival over the past 2 decades for limited- or extensive-stage disease.[34, 35] Indeed, very few new agents with activity in SCLC have been identified, even as identification of molecular targets and targeted therapies has proceeded at a brisk pace in non-SCLC.

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend following treatment recommendations for SCLC in patients who have mixed histologic features of SCLC and non–SCLC.[25, 29]

Elderly patients with SCLC who have a good performance status (PS) (ie, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] PS 0 or 1) and intact organ function should receive standard carboplatin-based chemotherapy. However, even those who have poor prognostic factors (eg, poor PS, medically significant concomitant conditions) may still be considered for chemotherapy if appropriate precautions are taken to avoid excessive toxicity and further decline in PS.[29]

Unlike non-SCLC, SCLC has not been shown to respond well to targeted therapies.[29] Studies of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors have yielded disappointing results: bevacizumab, aflibercept, and vandetanib have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in survival.[36] However, a recent phase II trial of sunitinib maintenance therapy in patients with untreated extensive-stage SCLC reported a modest but significant improvement in median progression-free survival, from 2.1 months with placebo to 3.7 months with sunitinib.[37]

See Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Protocols for summarized information.

Combination Chemotherapy

A number of randomized trials have tried to answer questions concerning the superiority of combination over single-agent chemotherapy, the number of drugs to be used in combination, and dose intensity. Nonrandomized trials of combination chemotherapy have shown superior response rates and survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Common combinations include cisplatin/etoposide (PE), cisplatin/irinotecan (IP), carboplatin/etoposide, and carboplatin/irinotecan.

Several platinum-based and non–platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with varying results.

In a systematic review that compared the effectiveness of these regimens, Amarasena et al concluded that platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did not provide a statistically significant benefit over non–platinum-based agents in survival or overall tumor response. However, platinum-based agents did result in higher complete response rates, albeit with an associated higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The investigators suggested that non–platinum-based chemotherapy regimens may have a better risk-benefit profile.[38]

Cisplatin and etoposide

PE is currently the most widely used regimen in both limited- and extensive-stage SCLC. The combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and vincristine (CAV) has been compared with PE in at least 2 randomized trials of previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC and showed similar survival outcomes. The PE combination is associated with less myelosuppression, whereas CAV has the convenience of administration in a single day (PE requires a 3-day program).[39]

Cisplatin and irinotecan

The PE combination has also been compared with other platinum-based regimens (eg, IP) and has been found to be effective for metastatic SCLC. A large Japanese study that compared PE with IP in patients with extensive-stage disease showed a 3-month-longer survival period with the IP combination (12.8 mo) relative to the PE combination (9.4 mo).[40]

Nonetheless, a more recent meta-analysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials found that, although the IP regimen significantly reduced mortality risk compared with the PE regimen, it also produced more hematologic toxicities in patients with extensive-stage SCLC.[41] In addition, the overall response rate between PE and IP treatment groups did not differ.[41] One of the trials in this meta-analysis suggested overall survival may be prolonged with a PCDE (etoposide, cisplatin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) regimen.

Several subsequent trials comparing the same combinations did not show a survival advantage with the IP combination, including a US trial that demonstrated an overall median survival time of 9.3 months for those in the IP group versus 10.2 months for those in the PE group.[42] Therefore, the PE combination remains the first-line combination chemotherapy choice for most physicians.

Carboplatin and etoposide versus carboplatin and irinotecan

The combination of carboplatin and etoposide has been used in patients with compromised renal function. A study by Schmittel et al found that the combination of carboplatin/irinotecan was not superior to that of carboplatin/etoposide.[43]

Cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy

A systematic review of randomized trials comparing cisplatin- to carboplatin-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for SCLC found no significant difference in efficacy between the 2 treatments.[44] This meta-analysis included 4 trials with a total of 663 patients (328 treated with cisplatin; 335 treated with carboplatin).

In the study, median overall survival was 9.6 months among cisplatin-treated patients and 9.4 months among carboplatin-treated patients. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months among cisplatin-treated patients and 5.3 months among carboplatin-treated patients. The objective response rate was 67.1% and 66.0%, respectively.[44] However, hematologic toxicity was higher with carboplatin, whereas nonhematologic toxicity was higher with cisplatin.[44]

Chemotherapy Dose Intensity and Density

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) should receive 4-6 cycles (but not >6 cycles) of cisplatin- or carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy (eg, cisplatin plus etoposide or irinotecan).[25, 29, 15] Several trials have tested the use of higher doses of standard chemotherapeutic regimens in previously untreated SCLC. Despite early enthusiasm brought on by higher initial response rates, most of these trials have failed to demonstrate improved survival.[45]

A trial by Arriagada et al comparing standard and higher doses of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in the first cycle of chemotherapy yielded a superior survival rate only in patients receiving higher-dose chemotherapy.[46] Higher-dose regimens, however, may cause life-threatening myelosuppression and, in the absence of survival advantage, should not be used outside of a clinical trial.

Another approach to increase the intensity of chemotherapy is to shorten the interval between cycles (increased dose density). Again, although phase II trials suggested the superiority of such an approach, randomized trials failed to show an advantage to the use of intensive weekly chemotherapy over standard regimens. One of the problems has been myelosuppression with weekly programs, such that the planned dose intensity has not been reached. Growth factor support may overcome this, but until randomized trials are reported to show clear superiority of such an approach, it remains investigational.

High-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow or stem cell transplantation

The available data do not support the use of high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow or stem cell transplantation, because no randomized trials have evaluated this approach to assess whether it will produce better survival rates than standard management and whether it is associated with greater immediate and delayed toxicity.

Limited-Stage SCLC - Standard Management

Standard management of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) involves combination chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy.Therefore, it is necessary to refer patients to a radiation oncologist, as well as a medical oncologist. For combination chemotherapy, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends four cycles of a platinum agent and etoposide.[29]

For patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend a maximum of four to six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide.[25] Continuing chemotherapy beyond four to six cycles has not been shown to significantly improve overall survival in most randomized controlled trials, and has been associated with considerable risk of increased toxicity; indeed, many oncologists now stop after four cycles of therapy.[25, 29, 15]

Patients who experience a complete or partial response to initial therapy and those who have undergone resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).


Patients with limited-stage SCLC typically receive concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy, which should begin as early as possible, preferably within 30 days of the start of chemotherapy.[29, 15] For patients who are eligible for early concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (twice-daily treatment) with platinum-based chemotherapy.[29]

In a randomized trial by Takada and colleagues in which treatment using cisplatin plus etoposide (PE) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy was compared with treatment using PE with sequential thoracic radiotherapy, the investigators reported superior 2- and 5-year survival rates (2-y survival, 35.1% vs 54.4%, respectively; 5-y survival, 18.3% vs 23.7%, respectively) with the concurrent approach.[47] However, hematologic toxicity was greater in the concurrent arm.

In another randomized trial, Turrisi and colleagues demonstrated superiority of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy administered with 4 cycles of PE in limited-stage SCLC relative to once-daily radiotherapy and concurrent PE.[48] The 10% survival improvement reported in this trial is the largest survival improvement ever noted in SCLC. In addition, 5-year survival rates were 26% versus 16%, respectively, in favor of hyperfractionated radiotherapy.[48] However, a major flaw in this trial was that the biologic equivalent dose of radiotherapy was not equivalent between the 2 treatment arms.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) notes that twice-daily radiotherapy is inconvenient and is associated with a significantly elevated rate of transient grade 3 esophagitis.Nevertheless,[15]

Prophylactic cranial irradiation

The ACCP and the 2013 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend PCI in patients with limited-stage disease who have achieved a complete remission or in those with stage I disease who have undergone resection.[25]

The use of PCI was initially considered controversial.[49] Several randomized trials showed a decrease in central nervous system (CNS) relapse rate with PCI but no survival advantage. Additionally, patients receiving PCI had a higher incidence of neuropsychiatric dysfunction than did those who did not receive PCI.[49]

Arriagada et al performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials of PCI in limited-stage SCLC and showed a 5% overall survival advantage in patients who received PCI.[46] Although such an analysis has inherent limitations, PCI is currently offered to patients with limited-stage SCLC who have achieved a complete or partial response after having completed initial chemoradiotherapy.

In a pooled analysis that evaluated outcomes of PCI in 739 SCLC patients with stable disease or better after treatment with chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiation therapy, Schild et al found that PCI resulted in a significant survival benefit in patients with either limited or extensive SCLC.[18] Dose fractionation appeared to be important, and PCI was associated with an increase in specific and overall grade 3+ adverse events.[50]

Extensive-Stage SCLC - Standard Management

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are treated with combination chemotherapy alone. The administration of carboplatin or cisplatin plus etoposide remains the standard of care in North America for extensive SCLC.

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend that patients with extensive-stage disease receive 4-6 cycles (but not >6 cycles) of cisplatin- or carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy (eg, cisplatin plus etoposide or irinotecan).[25, 29, 15]

Although cisplatin/etoposide (PE) remains the most widely used combination, a randomized trial that compared the combination of cisplatin with either etoposide or irinotecan in extensive-stage disease demonstrated that the combination of cisplatin and irinotecan (IP) was superior to that of PE. The median survival was 12.8 months with IP, versus 9.4 months with the PE combination. The 2-year survival rate was also superior at 19.5% for IP, versus 5.2% for PE.[40]

However, a confirmatory study in the United States failed to show the superiority of either regimen.[42]

Possible reasons for these contrasting results may have to do with differences in doses and schedules of the chemotherapeutic agents, as well as with genetic changes within different study populations. Although PE and IP had comparable overall response rates and survival outcomes, the IP combination had more gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.[51]

A German clinical trial reported that topotecan/cisplatin had a similar overall response rate to PE in extensive SCLC but a better time to progression and objective response rate than did PE.[52]


In general, radiotherapy is used only to palliate symptoms, if required (eg, for painful bone metastases) in extensive-stage SCLC. Response rates are excellent, but patients invariably relapse. The ACCP indicates that consolidative thoracic radiotherapy to the chest is a treatment option for patients who achieve a complete response (CR) outside the chest and complete or partial (PR) response in the chest.[29]

In a phase III randomized controlled trial, Slotman et al showed that patients with extensive-stage SCLC who had responded to chemotherapy may benefit from thoracic radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Although overall survival at 1 year was not significantly different in the patients who received thoracic radiotherapy, 2-year overall survival was 13% with radiotherapy versus 3% without (P=0.004). At 6 months, progression-free survival was 24% with radiotherapy versus 7% without (P=0.001). No severe toxic effects from radiotherapy were noted.[53]

Prophylactic cranial irradiation

As with limited-stage disease, offer prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) to all responding patients with extensive stage SCLC[25, 29, 15] ; this treatment should be considered standard therapy for this stage of the disease in these patients. Brain metastases at the time of initial diagnosis in extensive SCLC are present in about 18% of patients and increase to about 80% at 2 years.

A study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) that randomized patients responding to systemic chemotherapy into 2 groups, those who received PCI and those who did not, found that the 1-year survival rate for the PCI-treated group was 27.1%, compared with 13.3% for patients who did not receive PCI.[49]

In the study, PCI not only reduced the incidence of brain metastases but also improved disease-free and overall survival rates.

However, the 2010 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) practice guidelines noted that safety data on PCI administered concurrently with chemotherapy are lacking; therefore, this combination is not recommended outside of a clinical trial.[15]

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery is a salvage option for patients with brain metastases for whom previous whole-brain irradiation has failed.[54]

Management of Relapsed SCLC

Patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have an extremely poor prognosis. Individuals whose disease does not respond to or that progresses on initial treatment (ie, patients with refractory disease) or those whose SCLC relapses within 6 months of completion of therapy have little chance of responding to additional chemotherapy.

In general, the administration of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) after vincristine (CAV) failure produces better response rates than does CAV given after PE.

Topotecan received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2007 for use in chemotherapy-sensitive disease after failure of front-line chemotherapy.[55] Because of the lack of long-term benefit of this therapy, however, patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC should be encouraged to enroll in clinical trials, if their condition permits.[56]

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends offering second-line, single-agent chemotherapy to patients with relapsed or refractory SLCL. For patients who relapse more than 6 months after completion of initial chemotherapy, the ACCP recommends reusing the previously administered first-line chemotherapy regimen. Enrollment in a clinical trial is encouraged.[29]

Management of Brain Metastases and Spinal Cord Compression

Brain metastases

Management of symptomatic brain metastases includes high-dose corticosteroids (eg, intravenous [IV] dexamethasone 10 mg initially, followed by an IV or oral [PO] dose of 4-6 mg q6h) and immediate whole brain radiation therapy.

For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, systemic chemotherapy may be initiated, with plans for close surveillance of the central nervous system (CNS) metastases and initiation of brain radiation after completion of systemic treatment.

In patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), brain metastases usually respond to systemic chemotherapy, but radiation can be sandwiched between cycles of chemotherapy if there is any clinical or radiographic evidence of progression of CNS disease.

Spinal cord compression

Spinal cord compression is an oncologic emergency, because patients rarely regain neurologic function once it has been lost. New onset of back pain in patients known to have malignant disease should raise the suspicion of cord compression.

A thorough neurologic examination and radiologic evaluation of the spine are indicated with any suspicion of spinal cord compression. The goal is to prevent the development of neurologic deficit, since such a deficit, once present, can progress within hours to cause complete paraplegia. Any delay in instituting appropriate therapy may result in permanent neurologic deficit.

Patients in whom spinal cord compression is suspected should receive IV corticosteroids even before being sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The typical dose is 10 mg of dexamethasone IV, followed by 4-6 mg IV/PO every 6 hours.

If spinal cord compression occurs in a patient with known SCLC, definitive management consists of radiation therapy and/or neurosurgical decompression, which should be undertaken without delay.

Surgical Resection

Historically, patients undergoing surgery for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) had a dismal prognosis. However, more recent data suggest that patients with true stage I SCLC may benefit from surgical resection. The American College of Chest physicians (ACCP) recommends that patients being considered for resection undergo invasive mediastinal staging and extrathoracic imaging, such as cranial computed tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominal CT scanning, and bone scanning.[29]

Fewer than 5% of patients with SCLC present with such early stage disease, but those who are found to have clinical stage T1/T2 N0 disease after initial staging work-up should undergo invasive mediastinal lymph node evaluation via mediastinoscopy, mediastinotomy, or endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy.[57, 15] If there is no evidence of mediastinal lymph node involvement, then surgical exploration with resection of the primary tumor and mediastinal lymph node sampling is a reasonable treatment option.

Due to the systemic nature of SCLC, all patients should receive adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) after successful resection.[29]

In a review by Anraku and Waddel, the investigators indicated that surgical resection combined with chemotherapy for T1-2, N0, M0 SCLC may offer better local control of the disease than does chemotherapy alone.[58] In addition, curative resection following induction chemoradiotherapy has shown a control of local relapse in almost 100% of patients. Likewise, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 39% and 35%, respectively, for all included patients, resected or not, and they were 44% and 41%, respectively, for patients with stage IIB to IIIA disease treated with a trimodality approach that included adjuvant surgery.[58]

Management of Complications

Physicians should be aware of potential complications in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), including tumor lysis syndrome and electrolyte abnormalities.

Tumor lysis syndrome

Tumor lysis can occur rapidly in patients with SCLC on institution of chemotherapy, especially in cases of extensive-stage disease. The laboratory features of tumor lysis syndrome are hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, and hyperkalemia. Patients should be well hydrated and, preferably, premedicated with allopurinol. The management of established tumor lysis syndrome is urinary alkalinization, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, and dialysis, if necessary.

Electrolyte abnormalities

SCLC is associated with a number of electrolyte abnormalities because of frequent production of peptide hormones. The most common abnormality is hyponatremia, which, if severe, may cause neurologic symptoms and signs, including seizures, coma, and death. Prompt recognition of hyponatremia and its severity is important.

Evidence that supports the prognostic value of this abnormality was shown in a retrospective study of 395 SCLC patients with limited and extensive disease in which patients with hyponatremia had a significantly shorter median survival time than did patients without hyponatremia.[59]

Hyponatremia results from inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), which results in the inability of the kidneys to excrete free water. Syndrome of inappropriate ADH (SIADH) is reported in 5-10% of patients with SCLC. The serum sodium level is usually less than 130 mEq/L. Other causes of hyponatremia (ie, volume depletion, abnormal renal function) must be excluded.

Fluid restriction and pharmacologic therapy in the form of demeclocycline (a tetracycline antibiotic that decreases the sensitivity of renal tubules to the action of ADH) are the usual forms of management.


Patients in whom lung cancer is suspected may require consultation with a pulmonologist to establish a diagnosis. Once a diagnosis has been made, medical and radiation oncologists should be consulted to complete the staging workup and devise a management plan. In addition, owing to the importance of weight loss as an indicator of poor prognosis in persons with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), obtain a dietary consultation for patients with persistent weight loss.

Long-Term Monitoring

Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) require close monitoring for adverse effects and response to therapy. Blood work, including a complete blood count (CBC) with differential, is needed before each cycle of chemotherapy to ensure marrow recovery before the next dose of chemotherapy is administered. Renal function should be monitored because of nephrotoxicity from cisplatin.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), if elevated before the start of therapy, is a good marker for response and should be monitored. In addition, computed tomography (CT) scans should be obtained after 2 cycles of therapy to assess response before chemotherapy is continued. In general, patients who are asymptomatic require follow-up only as clinically needed.[15]

Patients who smoke cigarettes should be encouraged to quit. A meta-analysis by Parsons et al suggested that smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer may improve prognosis, probably by reducing cancer progression. Evaluation of data from 9 studies showed that the estimated 5-year survival rate in limited-stage SCLC was 63% in patients who quit smoking, versus 29% in those who continued to smoke.[6]

Medication Summary

Combination platinum-based chemotherapy, as well as thoracic radiation therapy, is typically administered in the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Combination chemotherapy is also administered to patients with extensive-stage SCLC, although this form of the disease remains incurable with current management options.

Despite strides in the management of SCLC, there has been little change in survival over the past 2 decades for either the limited- or extensive-stage forms of the disease, and very few new agents with activity in SCLC have been identified.[34, 35]

Dexamethasone (Decadron, Dexamethasone Intensol, Dexasone)

Clinical Context:  Dexamethasone is a synthetic adrenocortical steroid with multiple indications. This agent is widely used in combination with serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonists to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by highly emetogenic agents (eg, cisplatin).

Class Summary

Corticosteroids reduce inflammation by decreasing the production of inflammatory mediators, suppressing neutrophil migration, and reversing increased capillary permeability. Dexamethasone also has antiemetic activity, but its mechanism of action is unknown.

Metoclopramide (Metozolv ODT, Reglan)

Clinical Context:  Metoclopramide is a dopamine antagonist that enhances the response to acetylcholine of tissue in the upper GI tract, causing antiemetic activity. At higher doses, metoclopramide blocks serotonin receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone of the central nervous system (CNS).

Ondansetron (Zofran, Zofran ODT, Zuplenz)

Clinical Context:  Ondansetron is a selective serotonin (5-HT3)-receptor antagonist that is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Granisetron (Kytril, Granisol, Sancuso)

Clinical Context:  Granisetron is a selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist that is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Dolasetron (Anzemet)

Clinical Context:  Dolasetron binds to 5-HT3 receptors located on vagal neurons in the GI tract, blocking signals to the vomiting center, thus preventing nausea and vomiting.

Palonosetron (Aloxi)

Clinical Context:  Palonosetron is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with long half-life (40 h) that blocks 5-HT3 receptors peripherally and centrally in the chemoreceptor trigger zone. This agent is indicated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Class Summary

Vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents is stimulated through the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ), which then stimulates the vomiting center (VC) in the brain. Increased activity of central neurotransmitters (dopamine in the CTZ or acetylcholine in the VC) appears to be a major mediator in inducing vomiting. Following administration of antineoplastic agents, serotonin (5-HT) is released from enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. With 5-HT release and subsequent binding to 5-HT3 receptors, vagal neurons are stimulated and transmit signals to the VC, resulting in nausea and vomiting.

Antineoplastic agents may cause nausea and vomiting that are so intolerable that a patient may refuse further treatment. Some antineoplastic agents are more emetogenic than others. Prophylaxis with antiemetic agents before and following cancer treatment is often essential to ensure the administration of the entire chemotherapy regimen.

Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar)

Clinical Context:  Cyclophosphamide is chemically related to the nitrogen mustards. As an alkylating agent, the mechanism of action of its active metabolites may involve cross-linking of DNA, which may interfere with the growth of normal and neoplastic cells. Fatal cardiotoxicity has been reported with coadministration of pentostatin.

Carboplatin (Paraplatin)

Clinical Context:  Carboplatin is a platinum alkylating agent that interferes with the function of DNA by producing interstrand DNA cross-links. It can be used for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is an off-label indication. Carboplatin has black box warnings, including bone marrow suppression, anaphylactic reactions, and vomiting.


Clinical Context:  Cisplatin is a platinum-containing compound that exerts an antineoplastic effect by covalently binding to DNA, with preferential binding to the N-7 position of guanine and adenosine. It can react with 2 different sites on DNA to produce cross-links. The platinum complex can also bind to nuclear and cytoplasmic protein. Cisplatin has black box warnings, including anaphylacticlike reactions, ototoxicity, and renal toxicity.

Ifosfamide (Ifex)

Clinical Context:  Ifosfamide is a nitrogen mustard alkylating agent that inhibits DNA and protein synthesis. Although not FDA approved, ifosfamide is often used as a treatment for relapsed SCLC.

Class Summary

Alkylating antineoplastic agents inhibit cell growth and proliferation. They inhibit DNA synthesis by the formation of DNA cross-links. Alkylating agents can have serious adverse effects, such as bone marrow suppression, anaphylactic-like reactions, ototoxicity, renal toxicity, and vomiting.

Irinotecan (Camptosar)

Clinical Context:  Irinotecan binds reversibly to the topoisomerase I-DNA complex and prevents the ligation of the cleaved DNA strand. It has been used off label for the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Black box warnings for irinotecan include bone marrow suppression and diarrhea.

Topotecan (Hycamtin)

Clinical Context:  Topotecan inhibits topoisomerase I and thereby inhibits DNA replication. This agent may interact with other antineoplastic drugs to cause prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in addition to increasing morbidity/mortality. Topotecan is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Class Summary

Topoisomerase-inhibiting agents prevent cell growth and proliferation. They work by binding to topoisomerase and causing single-strand DNA breaks.

Doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Caelyx, Rubex)

Clinical Context:  Doxorubicin is an anthracycline antineoplastic that causes DNA strand breakage through its effects on topoisomerase II and through direct intercalation into DNA, which causes DNA polymerase inhibition. It has a labeled indication for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Doxorubicin has several black box warnings, including bone marrow suppression, myocardial toxicity, and secondary malignancy.

Class Summary

Anthracycline antineoplastic agents inhibit DNA and RNA synthesis by steric obstruction. They intercalate between DNA base pairs and trigger DNA cleavage by topoisomerase II.

Vincristine (Oncovin)

Clinical Context:  Vincristine inhibits tubulin polymerization during mitosis. This agent is G2-phase specific. Vincristine may interact with mitomycin-C and cause an acute pulmonary reaction.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine)

Clinical Context:  Vinorelbine is a vinca alkaloid that inhibits tubulin polymerization during G2 phase of cell division, thereby inhibiting mitosis.

Class Summary

Vinca alkaloid antineoplastic agents bind to tubulin and inhibit microtubule formation. These drugs arrest the cell at metaphase; they are specific to M and S phases.

Paclitaxel (Taxol, Abraxane)

Clinical Context:  Paclitaxel promotes microtubule assembly, interferes with the G2 mitotic phase, and inhibits cell replication. It has an off-label indication for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Black box warnings for paclitaxel include bone marrow suppression and hypersensitivity reactions.

Docetaxel (Taxotere, Docefrez)

Clinical Context:  Docetaxel inhibits the depolymerization of tubulin, which inhibits DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis. It can be used for the treatment of relapsed SCLC, which is an off-label indication. Docetaxel has several black box warnings, such as bone marrow suppression, fluid retention, and hypersensitivity reactions. This drug is not recommended for use in certain patients with hepatic impairment. Patients undergoing docetaxel treatment should be premedicated with corticosteroids the day before administration, to help reduce fluid retention and hypersensitivity reactions.

Class Summary

Antimicrotubular antineoplastic agents prevent cell growth and proliferation. They work by enhancing tubulin dimers, stabilizing existing microtubules, and inhibiting their disassembly.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar)

Clinical Context:  Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analog. After intracellular metabolism to its active nucleotide, it inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and competes with deoxycytidine triphosphate for incorporation into DNA. Although use of this drug as a treatment for refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), gemcitabine is often used for this purpose.

Class Summary

Antimetabolite antineoplastic agents inhibit cell growth and proliferation. They interfere with DNA synthesis by blocking the methylation of deoxyuridylic acid.

Etoposide (Toposar, VePesid)

Clinical Context:  Etoposide inhibits topoisomerase II and appears to cause DNA strand breakage. It has been shown to delay transit of cells through the S phase and arrest cells in the late S or early G2 portion of the cell cycle. Etoposide is used in combination chemotherapy for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Teniposide (vm 26, Vumon)

Clinical Context:  Teniposide inhibits topoisomerase II and appears to cause DNA strand breakage, preventing mitosis. This agent is used in combination chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC. Black box warnings for teniposide include myelosuppression and hypersensitivity reactions.

Class Summary

Podophyllotoxin is a nonalkaloid toxin lignan from which etoposide and teniposide derive. These derivative agents have been shown to delay transit through the S phase and arrest cells in late S or early G2 phase. They appear to be topoisomerase II inhibitors and cause DNA strand breaks.


Winston W Tan, MD, FACP, Associate Professor of Medicine, Mayo Medical School; Consultant and Person-in-Charge of Genitourinary Oncology-Medical Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville; Vice Chairman of Education, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Irfan Maghfoor, MD, Consulting Oncologist, Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jules E Harris, MD, FACP, FRCPC, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP† Former Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Former Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Former Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine


  1. Boffetta P, Trichopoulos D. Cancer of the lung, larynx, and pleura. Adami H, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, eds. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008. 349-67.
  2. Krug LM, Kris MG, Rosenzweig K, Travis WD. Cancer of the lung. DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2008. 947-66.
  3. Tsao A, Glisson B. Small cell lung cancer. Kantarjian H, Wolff R, Koller C, eds. MD Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2006. 233-56.
  4. Wynder EL, Graham EA. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma; a study of 684 proved cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 May 27. 143(4):329-36. [View Abstract]
  5. Pesch B, Kendzia B, Gustavsson P, Jockel KH, Johnen G,et al. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer--relative risk estimates for the major histological types from a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 1. 131(5):1210-9. [View Abstract]
  6. Parsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Jan 21. 340:b5569. [View Abstract]
  7. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr. 58(2):71-96. [View Abstract]
  8. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008.
  9. Frank AL. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Roth JA, Ruckdeschel J, Weisenburger T, eds. Thoracic Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1989. 6-15.
  10. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1. 24(28):4539-44. [View Abstract]
  11. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2009.
  12. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2010.
  13. Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. National Cancer Institute. Available at January 23, 2015; Accessed: October 2, 2015.
  14. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Available at Accessed: October 2, 2015.
  15. [Guideline] Früh M, De Ruysscher D, Popat S, Crinò L, Peters S, Felip E, et al. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct. 24 Suppl 6:vi99-105. [View Abstract]
  16. World Health Organization. Cancer fact sheet no. 297. Updated February 2015. Available at Accessed: October 2, 2015.
  17. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2011. Available at Accessed: June 8, 2012.
  18. Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2005 Oct 15-21. 366(9494):1385-96. [View Abstract]
  19. Janne PA, Freidlin B, Saxman S, Johnson DH, Livingston RB, Shepherd FA, et al. Twenty-five years of clinical research for patients with limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma in North America. Cancer. 2002 Oct 1. 95(7):1528-38. [View Abstract]
  20. Campling BG, Sarda IR, Baer KA, Pang SC, Baker HM, Lofters WS, et al. Secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and vasopressin by small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 1995 May 15. 75(10):2442-51. [View Abstract]
  21. Shepherd FA, Laskey J, Evans WK, Goss PE, Johansen E, Khamsi F. Cushing's syndrome associated with ectopic corticotropin production and small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Jan. 10(1):21-7. [View Abstract]
  22. Sher E, Gotti C, Canal N, Scoppetta C, Piccolo G, Evoli A, et al. Specificity of calcium channel autoantibodies in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Lancet. 1989 Sep 16. 2(8664):640-3. [View Abstract]
  23. American Cancer Society. Lung cancer (small cell): how is small cell lung cancer staged?. Available at 9/12/2014; Accessed: October 2, 2015.
  24. Micke P, Faldum A, Metz T, Beeh KM, Bittinger F, Hengstler JG, et al. Staging small cell lung cancer: Veterans Administration Lung Study Group versus International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer--what limits limited disease?. Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep. 37(3):271-6. [View Abstract]
  25. [Guideline] NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Small Cell Lung Cancer Vol 1. 2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Available at Accessed: October 2, 1015.
  26. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:299-330.
  27. [Guideline] National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Lung cancer. The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Publication no. 121. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011.
  28. [Guideline] Lung Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at December 2013; Accessed: October 2, 2015.
  29. [Guideline] Jett JR, Schild SE, Kesler KA, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013 May. 143 (5 Suppl):e400S-19S. [View Abstract]
  30. [Guideline] Ung YC, Maziak DE, Vanderveen JA, Smith CA, Gulenchyn K, Evans WK, for the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto, Ontario: Cancer Care Ontario; 2007.
  31. Thomson D, Hulse P, Lorigan P, Faivre-Finn C. The role of positron emission tomography in management of small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011 Aug. 73(2):121-6. [View Abstract]
  32. Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE 2nd, Richards WG, el at. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005 Mar. 127(3):909-15. [View Abstract]
  33. Zakowski MF. Pathology of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Semin Oncol. 2003 Feb. 30(1):3-8. [View Abstract]
  34. Hanna NH, Einhorn LH. Small-cell lung cancer: state of the art. Clin Lung Cancer. 2002 Sep. 4(2):87-94. [View Abstract]
  35. Lally BE, Urbanic JJ, Blackstock AW, Miller AA, Perry MC. Small cell lung cancer: have we made any progress over the last 25 years?. Oncologist. 2007 Sep. 12(9):1096-104. [View Abstract]
  36. Leighl NB. Sunitinib: the next advance in small-cell lung cancer?. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20. 33 (15):1637-9. [View Abstract]
  37. Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L, Otterson GA, Thomas SP, Miller AA, et al. Chemotherapy With or Without Maintenance Sunitinib for Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study-CALGB 30504 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20. 33 (15):1660-5. [View Abstract]
  38. Amarasena IU, Walters JA, Wood-Baker R, Fong K. Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8. CD006849. [View Abstract]
  39. Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, et al. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1. 29(16):2215-22. [View Abstract]
  40. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10. 346(2):85-91. [View Abstract]
  41. Jiang L, Yang KH, Guan QL, Mi DH, Wang J. Cisplatin plus etoposide versus other platin-based regimens for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Intern Med J. 2012 Dec. 42(12):1297-309. [View Abstract]
  42. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1. 24(13):2038-43. [View Abstract]
  43. Schmittel A, Sebastian M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, et al. A German multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug. 22(8):1798-804. [View Abstract]
  44. Rossi A, Di Maio M, Chiodini P, Rudd RM, Okamoto H, Skarlos DV, et al. Carboplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: the COCIS meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10. 30(14):1692-8. [View Abstract]
  45. Klasa RJ, Murray N, Coldman AJ. Dose-intensity meta-analysis of chemotherapy regimens in small-cell carcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Mar. 9(3):499-508. [View Abstract]
  46. Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Riviere A, Monnet I, Chomy P, et al. Initial chemotherapeutic doses and survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 16. 329(25):1848-52. [View Abstract]
  47. Takada M, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Yokota S, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15. 20(14):3054-60. [View Abstract]
  48. Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28. 340(4):265-71. [View Abstract]
  49. Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, Rankin E, Snee M, Hatton M, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16. 357(7):664-72. [View Abstract]
  50. Schild SE, Foster NR, Meyers JP, Ross HJ, Stella PJ, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: findings from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Pooled Analysis. Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov. 23(11):2919-24. [View Abstract]
  51. Natale R, Lara P, Chansky K, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) with etoposide/cisplatin (EP) in patients (pts) with previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer (E-SCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 (suppl):400s.
  52. Heigener D, Freitag L, Eschbach C et al. Topotecan/cisplatin (TP) compared to cisplatin/etoposide (PE) for patients with extensive disease-small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): final results of a randomised phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 (suppl):400s.
  53. Slotman BJ, van Tinteren H, Praag JO, Knegjens JL, El Sharouni SY, Hatton M, et al. Use of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jan 3. 385 (9962):36-42. [View Abstract]
  54. Harris S, Chan MD, Lovato JF, Ellis TL, Tatter SB, Bourland JD, et al. Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery as salvage therapy after failure of whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1. 83(1):e53-9. [View Abstract]
  55. GlaxoSmithKline. GSK receives approval for Hycamtin(R) (topotecan) capsules for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer [press release]. October 15, 2007. Available at Accessed: December 10, 2012.
  56. Jotte R, Conkling P, Reynolds C, Galsky MD, Klein L, Fitzgibbons JF, et al. Randomized phase II trial of single-agent amrubicin or topotecan as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20. 29(3):287-93. [View Abstract]
  57. Schreiber D, Rineer J, Vongtama D, et al. Surgery for limited-stage small cell lung cancer, should the paradigm shift? A SEER-based analysis. J Clin Oncol (Suppl). 2008. 26:403s.
  58. Anraku M, Waddell TK. Surgery for small-cell lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Fall. 18(3):211-6. [View Abstract]
  59. Hermes A, Waschki B, Reck M. Hyponatremia as prognostic factor in small cell lung cancer--a retrospective single institution analysis. Respir Med. 2012 Jun. 106(6):900-4. [View Abstract]
  60. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al, and the National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 29. 365(5):395-409. [View Abstract]
  61. Wu C, Xu B, Yuan P, Miao X, Liu Y, Guan Y, et al. Genome-wide interrogation identifies YAP1 variants associated with survival of small-cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 1. 70(23):9721-9. [View Abstract]
  62. Xun WW, Brennan P, Tjonneland A, Vogel U, Overvad K, el at. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (5p15.33, 15q25.1, 6p22.1, 6q27 and 7p15.3) and lung cancer survival in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Mutagenesis. 2011 Sep. 26(5):657-66. [View Abstract]

High-power photomicrograph of small cell carcinoma on the left side of the image with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium on the right side of the image.

This coronal positron emission tomogram shows a large, focal, hypermetabolic area on the right that is consistent with a large mass in the central portion of the right upper pulmonary lobe. Multiple other smaller hypermetabolic areas suggest lymph-node metastatic disease in the chest, abdomen, and right supraclavicular region.

High-power photomicrograph of small cell carcinoma on the left side of the image with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium on the right side of the image.

High-power photomicrograph of small cell carcinoma on the left side of the image with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium on the right side of the image.

This coronal positron emission tomogram shows a large, focal, hypermetabolic area on the right that is consistent with a large mass in the central portion of the right upper pulmonary lobe. Multiple other smaller hypermetabolic areas suggest lymph-node metastatic disease in the chest, abdomen, and right supraclavicular region.

Organ System Syndrome Mechanism Frequency
EndocrineSIADHAntidiuretic hormone15%[20]
Ectopic secretion of ACTHACTH2-5%[21]
NeurologicEaton-Lambert reverse myasthenic syndrome 3%[22]
Subacute cerebellar degeneration  
Subacute sensory neuropathy  
Limbic encephalopathyAnti-Hu, anti-Yo antibodies 
ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; SCLC = small cell lung cancer; SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.

Sources: (1) Campling BG, Sarda IR, Baer KA, et al. Secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and vasopressin by small cell lung cancer. Cancer. May 15, 1995;75(10):2442-51[20] ; (2) Shepherd FA, Laskey J, Evans WK, et al. Cushing's syndrome associated with ectopic corticotropin production and small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1992;10(1):21-7[21] ; (3) Sher E, Gotti C, Canal N, et al. Specificity of calcium channel autoantibodies in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Lancet. Sep 16, 1989;2(8664):640-3.[22]

Primary Tumor (T) Tumor Size Location of Involvement
TX Primary tumor can’t be assessed, or sputum cytology reveals tumor cells but the tumor is not seen on radiologic or bronchoscopic evaluation
T0 No evidence of a primary tumor
Tis Carcinoma in situ
T1 ≤3 cm in diameterSurrounded by lung or visceral pleura; no invasion more proximal than lobar bronchus
  • >3 cm but ≤7 cm diameter, or
  • (see right column)
  • Main bronchus, ≥2 cm distal to carina, or
  • Visceral pleura, or
  • Hilar region, but not entire lung, associated with atelectasis/obstructive pneumonitis
T2a >3 cm but ≤5 cm diameter 
T2b >5 cm but ≤7 cm diameter 
  • >7 cm diameter, or
  • (see right column)
Direct invasion of:
  • Parietal pleural chest wall, diaphragm, phrenic nerve, mediastinal pleura, parietal pericardium, or
  • Main bronchus < 2 cm distal to carina (but not carina itself), or
  • Entire lung with associated atelectasis/obstructive pneumonitis, or
  • Same lobe, separate tumor nodule(s)
T4 Any sizeInvasion of:
  • Mediastinum, heart, great vessels, trachea, recurrent laryngeal nerve, esophagus, vertebral body, or carina
  • Different ipsilateral lobe, separate tumor nodule(s)
Node (N) Location of Regional Metastatic Involvement
NX Regional lymph nodes can’t be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
  • Ipsilateral peribronchial and/or ipsilateral hilar lymph nodes, and
  • Intrapulmonary nodes, including direct extension
N2 Ipsilateral mediastinal and/or subcarinal lymph node(s)
N3 Contralateral mediastinal, contralateral hilar, ipsilateral/contralateral scalene, or supraclavicular lymph node(s)
Metastasis (M) Location of Distant Metastatic Involvement
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
  • Contralateral lobe tumor with separate tumor nodule(s), or
  • Malignant pleural effusion, or
  • Malignant pericardial effusion
  M1b Distant metastasis
AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Adapted from: (1) Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:299-330[26] ; (2) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:Small Cell Lung Cancer [serial online]. 2013;v.2. Available at: Accessed December 5, 2011.[25]

  Primary Tumor (T) Regional Node (N) Metastasis (M)
Occult Cancer TXN0M0
Stage 0 TisN0M0
Stage I A T1N0M0
B T2aN0M0
Stage IIA T2bN0M0
Stage IIB T2bN1M0
Stage IIIA T1-2N2M0
Stage IIIB T1-2N3M0
Stage IV Any TAny NM1a
Any TAny NM1b
AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Adapted from: (1) Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:299-330[26] ; (2) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:Small Cell Lung Cancer [serial online]. 2013;v.2. Available at: Accessed December 5, 2011.[25]