Fungal Pneumonia

Back

Overview of Fungal Pneumonia

Pneumonia is the leading infectious cause of death in developed countries.[1, 2] Among the vast diversity of respiratory pathogens, fungi account for only a small portion of community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonias. However, fungal respiratory infections generate concern in the expanding population of immunosuppressed patients.[1] Fungi may colonize body sites without producing disease or they may be a true pathogen, generating a broad variety of clinical syndromes.

Fungal pneumonia is an infectious process in the lungs caused by one or more endemic or opportunistic fungi. Fungal infection occurs following the inhalation of spores, after the inhalation of conidia, or by the reactivation of a latent infection. Hematogenous dissemination frequently occurs, especially in an immunocompromised host.

Endemic fungal pathogens (eg, Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Sporothrix schenckii, Cryptococcus neoformans) cause infection in healthy hosts and in immunocompromised persons, in defined geographic locations of the Americas and around the world.

Opportunistic fungal organisms (eg, Candida species, Aspergillus species, Mucor species) tend to cause pneumonia in patients with congenital or acquired defects in the host immune defenses.

The diagnosis of fungal pneumonias is difficult to prove, and is often made on a presumptive basis. It relies on a combination of clinical, radiologic, and microbiological factors. Nonmolecular fungal markers in serum or other biological samples represent a noninvasive diagnostic tool, which can help in therapeutic decisions.[1]

The individual prognosis is often linked to the severity and outcome of the underlying disease and to whether a reversal of factors affecting the patient's immune status is possible.

Pulmonary nodules resulting from fungal infection are seen below.


View Image

Chest radiograph showing multiple pulmonary nodules. The patient was treated with corticosteroids for acute graft versus host disease following bone m....

Complications of fungal pneumonia

Complications of fungal pneumonia include (1) disease dissemination to other sites (ie, brain, meninges, skin, liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, heart, eyes) and sepsis syndrome and (2) blood vessel invasion, which can lead to hemoptysis, pulmonary infarction, myocardial infarction, cerebral septic emboli, cerebral infarction, or blindness.

Other complications may include the following:

Treatment of fungal infection

Therapy for fungal pneumonias must include antifungal agents. The type of antifungal drug employed must be selected based on the particular pathogen that is isolated or that is clinically suspected. Many classes of antifungal agents are now available, including the classic antibiotics; first-, second-, and third-generation triazoles; and the echinocandins. Amphotericin B is less frequently used and, when used, is often given as a liposomal formulation to decrease toxicity.[3]

Risk Factors

Workers or farmers with heavy exposure to bird, bat, or rodent droppings or other animal excreta in endemic areas are predisposed to any of the endemic fungal pneumonias, such as histoplasmosis, in which the environmental exposure to avian or bat feces encourages the growth of the organism. In addition, farmers, nursery workers, landscapers, and gardeners are at higher risk of acquiring sporotrichosis because of their chance of cuts or puncture wounds while working with soil.

Coccidioides species are dimorphic existing as mold in the environments and as spherules in vivo. Arthroconidia in mold state are easily dispersed and inhaled into the lungs.[3] Therefore, because of its high virulence, it is also a threat among laboratory personnel working with this fungus.[3]

Conditions that predispose patients to any of the opportunistic fungal pathogens are as follows:

With regard to predisposition through stem cell transplants, certain toll-like receptor (TLR) polymorphisms (eg, TLR 4 haplotype S4) in an unrelated stem cell donor can increase the risk of invasive aspergillosis in the transplant recipient.[4] Similarly, TLR1 and TLR6 polymorphisms in the recipient have been associated with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.[5]

Epidemiology of Fungal Pneumonia

Distribution endemic fungi in the United States

Endemic fungi are prevalent in the Mississippi River Valley and the Ohio River Valley (eg, H capsulatum, B dermatitidis), the southwestern United States, and northwestern Mexico (eg, C immitis).

The environmental niche for H capsulatum is soil enriched by nitrogen contained in birds' and bats' droppings,[3] whereas B dermatitidis is found in the soil and decaying wood, especially in waterways.[3]

Coccidioides species is found in alkaline, highly salinic, sandy soils and extreme temperatures.

Sporotrichosis has been described worldwide; prevalence is higher in tropical and temperate zones. Infection generally occurs following traumatic inoculation with soil, plants, and organic matter contaminated with the fungus. However, it occasionally may be inhaled, causing pneumonitis that often cavitates.[6]

International distribution and incidence of fungal infection

These fungi have caused several pneumonia outbreaks in Argentina and other areas of Central and South America. P brasiliensis is restricted to Central and South America. African histoplasmosis, which is caused by H capsulatum duboisii, is limited to equatorial Africa between 20° N and 10° S, which includes Gabon, Uganda, and Kenya.

The other opportunistic organisms are ubiquitous, are usually found worldwide, and tend to cause disease in hosts with abnormal immune defenses. For instance, C neoformans can affect people with intact immune systems at a rate of 0.2 cases per million population per year. Prior to the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), approximately 80-90% of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) developed cryptococcosis.[7]

Morbidity and mortality in fungal infection and pneumonia

The endemic fungal pneumonias are generally self-limited in healthy hosts. C immitis is the most virulent, yet 90% of patients recover without treatment. However, patients with fungal pneumonias may develop chronic pulmonary complications (eg, cavitation, pleural effusions, bronchopleural fistulas) or extrapulmonary complications. In patients with AIDS, the mortality rate is as high as 70%.

Aspergillosis represents the leading cause of invasive pulmonary lung infection and death among patients who are neutropenic (from either leukemia chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation) with a mortality rate of 50-85%. More often, in the case of aspergillosis and candidal infections or meningoencephalitis in the case of cryptococcosis, the cause of mortality in patients who are immunocompromised is disseminated fungal disease.[8]

Mucormycosis represents the second most common cause of fungal pneumonia, accounting for approximately 10% of all invasive pulmonary infections in immunosuppressed patients and resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with hematologic malignancies are at highest risk, but uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and iron overload are important predisposing factors.[1] Rhizopus, Mucor, Absidia (Lichtheimia), and Rhizomucor species are the most commonly implicated.[1, 3]

The mortality rate for untreated disseminated histoplasmosis is 80%, but, with treatment, the rate is reduced to 25%.

Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are ubiquitous commensals of humans and can be found especially in the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract of most healthy humans. On the other hand, they are also the most pathogenic yeasts.[9] Among the Candida species, C albicans and C glabrata rank as the two most frequently isolated organisms.[9] Despite the frequent isolation of Candida species from respiratory samples in nonneutropenic patients, the organisms are not considered causes of pneumonia regardless of the species isolated.[10] Pneumonia from Candida species is exceptional in nonneutropenic patients.[10]

Sporothrix schenckii is the etiological agent of sporotrichosis, a chronic fungal infection that most frequently affects cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues and adjacent lymphatics.[6] However, extracutaneous forms have been described with no history of traumatic injuries, making the diagnosis difficult.[6] Pulmonary presentation is rare and may be caused by the dymorphic fungus S schenckii and even more rarely by other Sporothrix species. Lately, recognition of this condition has increased as more cases have been reported.[11] In immunocompromised patients, disseminated sporotrichosis may be associated with significant morbidity and, possibly, mortality.

Race-associated characteristics

Although no race predilection is described, C immitis causes more severe disease in patients of African American[3] or Philippine descent.

Sex predilection

Endemic fungal disease affects men (75-95%) more often than women. Estrogen-mediated inhibition of mycelium-to-yeast transformation may be responsible for the male predominance. Estrogen also seems to have a protective effect against cryptococcal infection. Cryptococcosis has a male-to-female ratio of 2-3:1.

Effects of Disseminated Fungal Disease

Fungi may simply colonize body sites with no apparent disease, or they may invade, producing a wide variety of syndromes. The development of disease is a result of the susceptibility of the host and the virulence of the pathogen.[1]

Endemic mycoses with associated dissemination can affect skin (eg, papules, pustules, plaques, ulcers, abscesses, proliferative lesions that may mimic skin cancer as in B dermatitidis infection), bone and joints, and the brain and meninges (meningitis with poor prognosis [10-20%], brain abscess in infection with Aspergillus and Mucor species).

Other affected sites include the following:

Patient History

History findings in persons with fungal pneumonia may include the following:

In individuals who are neutropenic or immunocompromised, persistent fever (even before pulmonary findings) may be an early sign of infection, especially if the fever is unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Hypersensitivity or allergic reactions include allergic bronchial asthma (Aspergillus species, Candida species), allergic bronchopulmonary mycoses (Aspergillus species, Candida species), bronchocentric granulomatosis (necrotizing granulomatous replacement and eosinophilic infiltration of bronchial mucosa in infection with Aspergillus species), and extrinsic allergic alveolitis (malt worker's lung, farmer's lung).

Physical Examination

Signs and symptoms of fungal pneumonia are not specific, and are indistinguishable from those associated with respiratory infections of other origins.

Physical examination findings in patients with fungal pneumonia may include the following:

Important possible extrapulmonary findings include the following:

Differentials in Fungal Pneumonia

Conditions that can mimic the symptoms of fungal pneumonia include the following:

Workup Considerations

The mortality due to fungal respiratory infections among immunosuppressed populations has remained elevated despite the arrival of new antifungal medications. The paucity of specific signs of infections and the low sensitivity of conventional culture-based methods for its diagnosis results in delayed initiation of antifungal therapy.[1]

Nonculture-based diagnostic tools, such as galactomannan (GM) and beta-D-glucan (BG), are part of the diagnostic workup of invasive fungal pneumonia with other clinical, radiologic, and microbiologic criteria.

Complete Blood Count With Differential

The total white blood cell (WBC) count may be elevated in normal hosts with endemic mycoses.

Eosinophilia can be observed in the differentials, particularly in persons with coccidioidomycosis.

If the patient presents with neutropenia or leukopenia, the possibility of an opportunistic infection with Candida or Aspergillus organisms is increased.

Sputum Examination and Potassium Hydroxide Stain

This study may show fungal hyphae or yeasts. However, the results must correlate with the clinical situation, because saprophytic colonization occurs in the oropharyngeal or respiratory tract of some patients and may not necessarily indicate invasive infection.

Carefully transport, process, and culture specimens that may be contaminated by bacteria, may be saprophytic yeasts endogenous to the oral cavity, and may be airborne Conidia of saprophytic fungi.

The diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcal infection is confirmed if the organism is grown in culture from sputum or BAL fluid in a patient who has clinical symptoms and radiographic finding compatible with cryptococcosis.[3]

Histoplasmosis is definitively diagnosed by growth of the organism in sputum; BAL fluid, lung tissue, or mediastinal nodes can be cultured.[3]

In pulmonary sporotrichosis, the recovery of the fungi by culture of sputum and/or positive bronchoscopy are required for diagnosis.[11]

Cultures from sputum samples collected by fiber optic bronchoscopy are not valuable for the diagnosis of pneumonia by Candida.[10] To make the diagnosis, a biopsy is required to demonstrate tissue invasion. Colonization of the respiratory tract by C andida is very frequent in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation, but pneumonia by C andida is extremely rare because the innate defense mechanisms of the lungs make them relatively resistant to candida invasion.[10]

Blood and Urine Cultures

Obtain a blood culture to identify Candida species (lysis centrifugation) or B dermatitidis if the patient has disseminated disease.

Obtain a urine fungal culture in men after a prostatic massage, to identify Cryptococcus or Blastomycosis species.

Nonculture Methods for Detecting Fungal Infections

These provide a more rapid and sensitive test when compared with culture methodology. Various antigen detection assays, such as galactomannan enzyme immunoassay for detection of invasive aspergillosis, are now in clinical use. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based assays are also available for detecting various pathogens, including Aspergillus, Histoplasma, and Candida species.[12, 13, 14]

Comparison of these assays (antigen detection using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] or latex agglutination and molecular detection with PCR) show equal specificities for all 3 assays (≥97%) in the detection of Candida species. PCR-based assays are most sensitive compared with ELISA and latex agglutination (95%, 75%, and 25%, respectively).

The newest available testing in the diagnosis of blastomycosis is an enzyme immunoassay performed on urine or serum that detects a cell wall galactomannan antigen found in B dermatitidis. However, the cross reactivity with H capsulatum is close to 100%.[3] Therefore, in patients with blastomycosis, the sensitivity or specificity of these tests is not clear.[3]

For Aspergillus species antigen, galactomannan assay findings may be positive in the blood very early prior to clinical suspicion of invasive fungal infection and may be of use in monitoring and preemptive treatment in high-risk populations.[15, 16, 17, 1]

Using a galactomannan platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), investigators showed that two consecutive samples with an optical index of 0.5 provided the highest test accuracy (specificity, 97.5%; sensitivity, 92.1%; positive predictive value, 87.5%; negative predictive value, 98.5%).[18] Testing in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid increased the sensitivity compared with serum galactomannan assay from 71-100%.[19] Care should be taken, however, because false-positive results have been reported in patients taking piperacillin-tazobactam antibiotics and certain intravenous fluids, such as plasmalyte.[20]

Beta-glucan testing is also available and may be comparable or more sensitive than galactomannan assays in diagnosing invasive aspergillosis and can detect a broad spectrum of invasive fungal pathogens, including Pneumocystis jirovecii.[1] Several kits are available worldwide. False-positive results have also been reported in patients receiving fungal-derived antibiotics and cross-reactions have been reported with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.[21]

The molds causing mucormycosis, which belong to the subphylum Mucoromycotina, do not contain galactomannan or beta-glucan in their cell wall. Therefore, mucormycosis cannot be diagnosed with the galactomannan or beta-glucan assays.[1]

Aspergillus PCR is most sensitive (100%) when performed on the bronchial lavage fluid of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, but it is only 40-66% sensitive when performed on the blood. No standardized protocols have been established among laboratories performing this assay.[8, 13, 21]

ELISA or latex agglutination is 70-80% sensitive for identifying H capsulatum and C immitis. PCR for H capsulatum from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid aids in the rapid detection within 24 hours in a patient with AIDS, and this has been confirmed 10 days later based on the growth and culture isolation of the organism from various tissues.

Serology

The utility of serology depends on the individual fungal infectious agent. Antibody detection for the identification of C immitis is highly useful for all forms of pulmonary infection caused by this fungi.[3] Serology also plays an important role in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary and chronic cavitary pulmonary histoplasmosis. Both complement fixation and immunodiffusion tests should be ordered,[3] but these tests are of less utility if the pulmonary infection is due to other fungi.

Serology testing for blastomycosis provides little clinical diagnostic help because of the insensitivity of testing for this fungus and the antibody cross-reactivity that occurs with other fungal infections.

Patients with pulmonary sporotrichosis will have antibody against S schenckii; however, it is highly variable in sensitivity and specificity. Thus, it may not be useful in the diagnosis of the disease.

Detection of the polysaccharide capsule antigen in serum plays an important role in the diagnosis of disseminated cryptococcosis, but its sensitivity decreases in those patients not infected with human immunodeficiency virus, and also disease limited to the lung.[1]

Chest Radiography

Patchy infiltrate, nodules (seen in the image below), consolidation, cavitation, or pleural effusion may be observed.

Mediastinal adenopathy is common in patients with endemic fungal pneumonias. The adenopathy may be either unilateral or bilateral.

In neutropenic patients infected with aspergillosis (60%), pulmonary nodules surrounded by ground-glass opacity called “halo sign”[1, 3] is a common finding. On the other hand, lung transplant recipients present less specific patchy infiltrates.[3]

Miliary infiltration occurs in patients with disseminated disease.


View Image

Chest radiograph showing multiple pulmonary nodules. The patient was treated with corticosteroids for acute graft versus host disease following bone m....

CT Scanning and MRI

Chest CT scanning

This imaging study plays a role in the early diagnosis of nonspecific infiltrates in patients who are immunocompromised.

High-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) scanning allows observation of the halo sign in patients with aspergillosis. This is a nodular lesion usually surrounded by a ground-glass opacity or halo. As many as 61% of 235 patients with invasive aspergillosis were found to have the halo sign in one study.[22] Lung lesions from aspergillosis are shown below.

Obtaining a CT scan of the abdomen and brain may reveal sites of dissemination.


View Image

CT scan of a patient with invasive aspergillosis showing multiple lung lesions, some with cavitation.


View Image

CT scan of aspergillosis of the lungs showing multiple pleural-based and lung parenchymal lesions. One of the parenchymal lesions on the right gives a....

CT scans should be obtained at the first hint of pulmonary infection in patients at risk of mucormycosis because of the high mortality in this patient population. In patients with hematological malignancies, several non-specific findings have been proposed to differentiate mucormycosis of other infections, especially aspergillosis. These include the presence of multiple nodules and pleural effusions and the development of a “reverse halo,” which is ground glass attenuation in the center of a nodule with a surrounding zone of consolidation.[3, 23] The reversed halo sign is not exclusive of mucormycosis; it might also be found in patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and cryptococcosis.[23]

MRI of lung lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may reveal the hemorrhagic content of Aspergillus lesions.

Procedures

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (procedure of choice) is used to obtain bronchial lavage specimens for staining and culture techniques and transbronchial biopsy specimens for identification of fungal tissue invasion. This procedure reveals positive results in 75-90% of endemic mycoses, shows a 50-90% yield in cryptococcal disease, and shows varying yields in Aspergillus and Candida infections, for which clinical correlation is still important.

The yield of isolating Aspergillus from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens may also depend upon the underlying condition and the leukocyte count of the patient. One study demonstrated that there was little value in doing bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage in acute leukemia patients with leukocyte counts of less than 100/µL compared with nonleukemia patients such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients.[24]

Transthoracic CT-guided fine-needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules can provide material for histopathology and for special staining techniques and culture. Obtaining specimens in this manner might allow for avoidance of an open lung biopsy.

Occasionally, performing an open lung biopsy is the only way to prove invasive disease for Aspergillus or Candida organisms. However, this procedure may be difficult to perform in patients with severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia who are in respiratory failure.

Perform a lumbar spinal puncture in patients with suspected cryptococcosis or disseminated disease with central nervous system (CNS) symptomatology in order to detect the polysaccharide capsule antigen by latex agglutination or enzyme immunoassay.

Conduct a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy if the patient has persistent fever or suspected disseminated disease or if the patient has hematologic findings, such as thrombocytopenia or neutropenia.

Histologic Findings

Biopsy specimens show the following:

Histopathology

Treatment of Fungal Infection

In persons with endemic mycoses, spontaneous recovery usually occurs without treatment, especially in patients who are mildly affected and immunocompetent without dissemination; otherwise, administer treatment as outlined in the table below.

In cases in which aspergillosis, mucormycosis, and candidiasis occur in an immunocompromised host, reversing the factors affecting the patient's immune status is linked to successful recovery from the infection. Attempt ancillary interventions that may help to promote recovery from the opportunistic infection. These include (1) ensuring, with the use of growth factors, neutropenia recovery in patients receiving chemotherapy and bone marrow transplants; (2) withdrawing or tapering immunosuppressive drugs and steroids; and (3) removing infected or highly colonized catheters in patients with candidiasis.

Table. Medical and Surgical Fungal Therapy


View Table

See Table

Pharmacologic treatment

When treatment is indicated, initiate antifungal agents as appropriate. Amphotericin B is the mainstay of initial therapy in many cases, especially for patients who are acutely ill. More expensive liposomal preparations of amphotericin B offer equal efficacy with less toxicity. In patients with invasive aspergillosis, including pulmonary aspergillosis, voriconazole is the new standard of care, based on its superiority over amphotericin B as primary therapy.[26, 27, 28, 8, 3] Vary the dose and treatment duration depending on the underlying pathogen causing the pneumonia.

Care should be taken regarding patients on long-term voriconazole treatment. Bone pain with radiologic evidence of periostitis and 10-fold increased fluoride levels have been reported in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients taking the drug for at least 3 months. Symptoms and findings were reversed with discontinuation of voriconazole.[29]

There is a possible association between the use of voriconazole in markedly immunosuppressed patients as prophylactic agent and the development of mucormycosis, but this matter is still controversial.[3]

Amphotericin B is available in a variety of formulations. Conventional amphotericin B injection contains amphotericin B and sodium deoxycholate as the solvent vehicle.

Amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate complex (ABCD, Amphotec) consists of a 1:1 molar ratio of amphotericin B to cholesteryl sulfate in a colloidal dispersion, forming a bilayer in microscopic, disk-shaped particles that have a diameter of approximately 115 nm and a thickness of 4 nm.

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC, Abelcet) is composed of amphotericin B and phospholipid complex, with a microscopic, ribbonlike structure having a diameter of approximately 2-11 µm.

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB, AmBisome) contains amphotericin B intercalated in a unilamellar bilayer liposomal membrane; has a liposomal membrane diameter of less than 100 nm; and consists of hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, distearoyl phosphatidylglycerol, and alpha tocopherol.

Some clinicians offer empiric therapy with conventional amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B for presumed fungal infections in patients who are febrile and neutropenic (eg, cancer, bone marrow transplantation, solid organ transplantation) and whose febrile state persists after receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics for a few days. Other agents that could be used in this setting are itraconazole and an echinocandin, namely, caspofungin.[30] The therapy is continued until the neutropenia resolves and the patient does not show a documented fungal infection or radiographic infiltrate.

Prophylactic therapy (suppressive therapy) with amphotericin B is used against recurrence or relapse of coccidioidomycosis, cryptococcosis, or histoplasmosis in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who have received adequate treatment for the infection.

Other formulations, however, are starting to replace amphotericin B because of their ease of use (oral formulations) and lower toxicity for more long-term suppression. Posaconazole is used in the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in severely immunocompromised patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants who have graft-versus-host disease and in patients with hematologic malignancies who have chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.[31]

Other antifungal agents used in the treatment of fungal pneumonia are fluconazole (Diflucan), itraconazole (Sporanox), flucytosine (Ancobon), and ketoconazole (Nizoral). Newer antifungal agents, such as the third-generation triazoles or the echinocandins, are more tolerable than amphotericin B or its liposomal preparations are and may even be more effective in first- or second-line treatment.

There have been increasing reports of azole resistance in Aspergillus species. This might be the result of the increasing use of these agents for prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections; also there are associations with exposure to azole-like compounds used in the agricultural industry in some countries. In addition, some species have intrinsic resistance to various azoles.[3]

Caspofungin is approved for the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infections in patients unresponsive to or unable to receive amphotericin B. Combinations of a triazole with an echinocandin with or without amphotericin B have been anecdotally reported to be effective in some cases of resistant organisms, such as Mucor or Zygomycetes species.[30]

Echinocandins such as caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin[32, 33, 34] offer a broad spectrum of activity for the many Candida species, including fluconazole-resistant strains. They also show effectiveness in Aspergillus infections alone or in combination with an azole.

Because of the introduction of these safer and (possibly) more potent agents, and owing to the ability to combine them together, the outlook for patients with invasive pulmonary infections, especially immunocompromised hosts, may be improving.

The role of combination therapy has been studied only in small retrospective studies with very unclear results. Combination therapy is usually not indicated in first-line treatment. In rare cases, it might be offered with a great deal of caution as second-line or salvage treatment.[35]

The establishment of neutrophil recovery or engraftment and the reduction of immunosuppression in certain patients who are at risk for fungal infections are likely to improve the chances of a successful treatment outcome. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor can theoretically augment pulmonary host defenses against A fumigatus infection .

Surgical care

Indications for surgery in invasive aspergillosis are as follows[36] :

Surgery is indicated in patients with documented invasive aspergillosis who have been treated with antifungal agents but who have residual lesions. The surgery is performed to prevent disease relapse when additional immunosuppression is required.

Surgery is also indicated as a means to prevent or treat massive bleeding, especially when the lung lesion is contiguous with a large blood vessel.

In cavitary pulmonary sporotrichosis, surgical management should be considered in the course of the disease, even for bilateral presentation, providing that the patient has adequate predicted respiratory reserves post-surgery, as delayed surgery may result in complications and poorer outcomes.[11]

Inpatient Considerations

Watch for rapidly progressive respiratory failure in patients who are neutropenic. Patients may require intubation and mechanical ventilatory support. In patients who are severely neutropenic, rapid progression of fungal pneumonia and dissemination of fungal infection (eg, aspergillosis, mucormycosis) necessitate a high degree of suspicion, early empiric antifungal therapy, and corrective measures (if possible) to reverse neutropenia or other causes of immunosuppression.[3]

Consider rapidly reducing or withdrawing immunosuppressive therapy (eg, corticosteroids), if feasible.

Correct hyperglycemia and acidosis.

Consider the correction of neutropenia via the administration of growth factors (eg, filgrastim [Neupogen], pegfilgrastim [Neulasta], sargramostim [Leukine]) or leukocyte transfusions.

Outpatient Considerations

Offer maintenance therapy to suppress disease reactivation or recurrent disease in patients infected with HIV or in other individuals who are immunocompromised.

Ensure appropriate follow-up care to monitor for possible recurrence.

Patients with ongoing immune deficiencies may require prolonged or lifelong maintenance therapy with triazole agents to prevent recurrences.

Clinical Consultations

A pulmonologist may perform diagnostic procedures (eg, bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial biopsy).

Interventional radiologists can perform needle aspirations, when necessary, for diagnosis.

Patients who are severely ill and progressively hypoxic may require intensive care, ventilatory support, and pressor support in the ICU under the care of a critical care intensivist.

Rheumatologists can assist with the rheumatologic syndromes manifesting with the endemic mycoses.

Infectious disease consultants may assist with the intricacies of antifungal treatment, especially with respect to the exact drugs, dose, duration, therapy length, maintenance treatment, and follow-up.

Deterrence and Prevention of Fungal Pneumonia

Instruct patients to avoid travel to and exposure in endemic areas.

Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation or any period of prolonged neutropenia are advised to avoid activities (eg, gardening, cleaning, agitating debris) or objects (eg, potted plants, flowers, fresh fruits and vegetables, uncooked spices) that may unduly cause exposure to spores of Aspergillus species or other ubiquitous fungi.

For patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, solid organ transplantation, or antileukemic chemotherapy, the use of high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration systems in the treatment units may minimize patient risk of exposure to Aspergillus spores.

Administer prophylactic antifungal therapy (ie, treatment with intranasal or intravenous amphotericin B or its other formulations) in patients at high risk for opportunistic fungal infection, including patients with a history of fungal infection.[37]

In a study, prophylactic posaconazole was shown to be superior to fluconazole in reducing invasive aspergillosis incidence (1% vs 5.9%, respectively) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with clinically significant graft-versus-host disease.[38]

In another trial, conducted using neutropenic patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute leukemia or myelodysplasia, prophylactic posaconazole again reduced the incidence of invasive aspergillosis to 1%. The incidence in patients in the study who received either fluconazole or itraconazole was 7%.[39]

Author

Romeo A Mandanas, MD, FACP, Research Site Leader, Integris Cancer Institute of Oklahoma

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Dora E Izaguirre, MD, Observership in Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, SOP Medical Services; Observership in Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, The Brooklyn Hospital Center; Researcher, Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jesus Lanza, MD, Fellow in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Klaus-Dieter Lessnau, MD, FCCP, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine; Medical Director, Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory; Director of Research in Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Ryland P Byrd Jr, MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, James H Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Chief Editor

Ryland P Byrd Jr, MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, James H Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Lamoth F, Alexander BD. Nonmolecular methods for the diagnosis of respiratory fungal infections. Clin Lab Med. Jun 2014;34(2):315-36. [View Abstract]
  2. Restrepo MI, Faverio P, Anzueto A. Long-term prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. Apr 2013;26(2):151-8. [View Abstract]
  3. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Pulmonary fungal infections. Respirology. Aug 2012;17(6):913-26. [View Abstract]
  4. Bochud PY, Chien JW, Marr KA, Leisenring WM, Upton A, Janer M, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. Oct 23 2008;359(17):1766-77. [View Abstract]
  5. Kesh S, Mensah NY, Peterlongo P, Jaffe D, Hsu K, VAN DEN Brink M, et al. TLR1 and TLR6 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Dec 2005;1062:95-103. [View Abstract]
  6. Gewehr P, Jung B, Aquino V, et al. Sporotrichosis in renal transplant patients. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. Summer 2013;24(2):e47-9. [View Abstract]
  7. Hung CC, Chang SC. Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on incidence and management of human immunodeficiency virus-related opportunistic infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. Nov 2004;54(5):849-53. [View Abstract]
  8. Segal BH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 1 2006;173(7):707-17. [View Abstract]
  9. Brunke S, Hube B. Two unlike cousins: Candida albicans and C. glabrata infection strategies. Cell Microbiol. May 2013;15(5):701-8. [View Abstract]
  10. Garnacho-Montero J, Olaechea P, Alvarez-Lerma F, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of fungal respiratory infections in the critically ill patient. Rev Esp Quimioter. Jun 2013;26(2):173-88. [View Abstract]
  11. Aung AK, Teh BM, McGrath C, Thompson PJ. Pulmonary sporotrichosis: case series and systematic analysis of literature on clinico-radiological patterns and management outcomes. Med Mycol. Jul 2013;51(5):534-44. [View Abstract]
  12. Buchheidt D, Hummel M, Schleiermacher D, Spiess B, Hehlmann R. Current molecular diagnostic approaches to systemic infections with aspergillus species in patients with hematological malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma. Mar 2004;45(3):463-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Lass-Flörl C, Gunsilius E, Gastl G, Freund M, Dierich MP, Petzer A. Clinical evaluation of Aspergillus-PCR for detection of invasive aspergillosis in immunosuppressed patients. Mycoses. 2005;48 Suppl 1:12-7. [View Abstract]
  14. White PL, Archer AE, Barnes RA. Comparison of non-culture-based methods for detection of systemic fungal infections, with an emphasis on invasive Candida infections. J Clin Microbiol. May 2005;43(5):2181-7. [View Abstract]
  15. Herbrecht R, Letscher-Bru V, Oprea C, Lioure B, Waller J, Campos F, et al. Aspergillus galactomannan detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. Apr 1 2002;20(7):1898-906. [View Abstract]
  16. Mennink-Kersten MA, Donnelly JP, Verweij PE. Detection of circulating galactomannan for the diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis. Lancet Infect Dis. Jun 2004;4(6):349-57. [View Abstract]
  17. Musher B, Fredricks D, Leisenring W, Balajee SA, Smith C, Marr KA. Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and quantitative PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 2004;42(12):5517-22. [View Abstract]
  18. Maertens JA, Klont R, Masson C, Theunissen K, Meersseman W, Lagrou K, et al. Optimization of the cutoff value for the Aspergillus double-sandwich enzyme immunoassay. Clin Infect Dis. May 15 2007;44(10):1329-36. [View Abstract]
  19. Penack O, Rempf P, Graf B, Blau IW, Thiel E. Aspergillus galactomannan testing in patients with long-term neutropenia: implications for clinical management. Ann Oncol. May 2008;19(5):984-9. [View Abstract]
  20. Viscoli C, Machetti M, Cappellano P, Bucci B, Bruzzi P, Van Lint MT, et al. False-positive galactomannan platelia Aspergillus test results for patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 15 2004;38(6):913-6. [View Abstract]
  21. Del Bono V, Mikulska M, Viscoli C. Invasive aspergillosis: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment. Curr Opin Hematol. Nov 2008;15(6):586-93. [View Abstract]
  22. Greene RE, Schlamm HT, Oestmann JW, Stark P, Durand C, Lortholary O, et al. Imaging findings in acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: clinical significance of the halo sign. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2007;44(3):373-9. [View Abstract]
  23. Godoy MC, Viswanathan C, Marchiori E, et al. The reversed halo sign: update and differential diagnosis. Br J Radiol. Sep 2012;85(1017):1226-35. [View Abstract]
  24. Bergeron A, Porcher R, Sulahian A, de Bazelaire C, Chagnon K, Raffoux E. The strategy for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis should depend on both the underlying condition and the leukocyte count of patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. Feb 23 2012;119(8):1831-7; quiz 1956. [View Abstract]
  25. Mussini C, Pezzotti P, Miró JM, et al. Discontinuation of maintenance therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy: an international observational study. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2004;38(4):565-71. [View Abstract]
  26. Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, Caillot D, Herbrecht R, Thiel E, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2002;34(5):563-71. [View Abstract]
  27. Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, et al. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. Aug 8 2002;347(6):408-15. [View Abstract]
  28. Johnson LB, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2003;36(5):630-7. [View Abstract]
  29. Gerber B, Guggenberger R, Fasler D, Nair G, Manz MG, Stussi G. Reversible skeletal disease and high fluoride serum levels in hematologic patients receiving voriconazole. Blood. Sep 20 2012;120(12):2390-4. [View Abstract]
  30. Maertens J, Raad I, Petrikkos G, Boogaerts M, Selleslag D, Petersen FB, et al. Efficacy and safety of caspofungin for treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1 2004;39(11):1563-71. [View Abstract]
  31. Avery RK. Aspergillosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: risk factors, prophylaxis, and treatment. Curr Infect Dis Rep. May 2009;11(3):223-8. [View Abstract]
  32. Benjamin DK Jr, Driscoll T, Seibel NL, Gonzalez CE, Roden MM, Kilaru R, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in children with neutropenia at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Feb 2006;50(2):632-8. [View Abstract]
  33. [Best Evidence] Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Pappas PG, Chapman SW, Kett DH, Kumar D, et al. Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med. Jun 14 2007;356(24):2472-82. [View Abstract]
  34. Turner MS, Drew RH, Perfect JR. Emerging echinocandins for treatment of invasive fungal infections. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. May 2006;11(2):231-50. [View Abstract]
  35. [Guideline] Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, et al. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2008;46(3):327-60. [View Abstract]
  36. Kaffarnik M, Utzolino S, Blaich A, Hopt UT. Successful multimodal therapy of invasive pulmonary and central nervous system aspergillosis in a neutropenic surgical patient: case report and review of the literature. Mycoses. Jan 2008;51(1):74-8. [View Abstract]
  37. Hamza NS, Ghannoum MA, Lazarus HM. Choices aplenty: antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. Sep 2004;34(5):377-89. [View Abstract]
  38. Ullmann AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Tarantolo SR, et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. Jan 25 2007;356(4):335-47. [View Abstract]
  39. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. Jan 25 2007;356(4):348-59. [View Abstract]

Chest radiograph showing multiple pulmonary nodules. The patient was treated with corticosteroids for acute graft versus host disease following bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. The patient smoked marijuana for 2 weeks prior to this chest radiograph being taken. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed Aspergillus niger and other species on fungal cultures.

Chest radiograph showing multiple pulmonary nodules. The patient was treated with corticosteroids for acute graft versus host disease following bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. The patient smoked marijuana for 2 weeks prior to this chest radiograph being taken. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed Aspergillus niger and other species on fungal cultures.

CT scan of a patient with invasive aspergillosis showing multiple lung lesions, some with cavitation.

CT scan of aspergillosis of the lungs showing multiple pleural-based and lung parenchymal lesions. One of the parenchymal lesions on the right gives a suggestion of the halo sign.

Chest radiograph showing multiple pulmonary nodules. The patient was treated with corticosteroids for acute graft versus host disease following bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. The patient smoked marijuana for 2 weeks prior to this chest radiograph being taken. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed Aspergillus niger and other species on fungal cultures.

CT scan of a patient with invasive aspergillosis showing multiple lung lesions, some with cavitation.

CT scan of aspergillosis of the lungs showing multiple pleural-based and lung parenchymal lesions. One of the parenchymal lesions on the right gives a suggestion of the halo sign.

Fungal PathogenIndication for Antifungal TherapySurgical Care and Other TreatmentsAntifungal Drugs Used
HistoplasmosisAcute pulmonary histoplasmosis with hypoxia; prolonged moderate symptoms for more than 1 month; disseminated disease; immunosuppressed host

Mortality rate for untreated disseminated disease at 80%; reduced to 25% with treatment

Significant hemoptysis; recurrent pneumonia; repair of bronchopleural fistula

Corticosteroids in severe hypoxia or ARDS

Anti-inflammatory agents to treat rheumatologic syndromes

Amphotericin B induces rapid response in patients who are severely ill or immunocompromised

Azoles/triazoles in patients with milder illness

CoccidioidomycosisDisseminated disease; chronic pulmonary disease; acute pulmonary infection with hypoxia or protracted morbidity (>1-2 mo); immunosuppressed host (worst outcome, 70% mortality) Surgical debridement or resection of infective tissue often necessary adjunct to antifungal treatment

Anti-inflammatory agents for rheumatologic syndromes

Amphotericin B effective in more than 90% of cases; first choice in severe cases or immunocompromised

Fluconazole/itraconazole first choice in mild to moderate infection (or after improvement)

Treatment less effective than in other endemic mycoses

BlastomycosisPersistent or recurrent symptoms of acute or chronic pulmonary disease or with pleural involvement; disseminated diseaseSteroids for ARDSAmphotericin B response rates of 77-90% of cases; for severe infection or immunocompromised

Itraconazole successful in 90% of cases; for mild to moderate infection

Ketoconazole response of 80%; poor outcome in patients who are immunosuppressed

Fluconazole less effective, 65% response rate

Chronic maintenance treatment essential for all patients with AIDS or meningitis

CryptococcosisPatients who are immunosuppressed and symptomatic; patients who are immunocompetent with disease progression; any patients with meningitis or disseminated disease N/AAmphotericin B in patients who are severely ill

Fluconazole in milder cases or after clinical response to amphotericin B

Lifelong maintenance therapy in AIDS patients may not be necessary as long as the patient's CD4 count is maintained above 100 cells/µL with HAART[25]

Flucytosine may be of benefit when combined with amphotericin B in patients with severe or disseminated disease.[3]

AspergillosisAll patients with invasive disease; in patients who are immunosuppressed, early diagnosis and empiric treatment for persistent fever not responding to broad-spectrum antibiotics; high mortality once infiltrates and symptoms appear; prognosis ultimately linked to severity and outcome of underlying disease

Mortality rate of 50-60% in patients with AIDS

Rapid tapering of immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids and reversal of neutropenia (if possible)Voriconazole is the new standard of care for invasive aspergillosis based on superiority over amphotericin B in primary therapy

Lipid formulations of amphotericin B have at least equal efficacy but less toxicity compared with amphotericin B desoxycholate

Oral voriconazole can be used to complete treatment with initial response to IV voriconazole or amphotericin B

Posaconazole is second line agent

Echinocandins second line agent when voriconazole is not tolerated or in combination with voriconazole in an attempt to enhance antifungal activity

MucormycosisMortality rates as high as 70% in patients with invasive pulmonary mucormycosisAggressive surgical debridement of necrotic tissue important in mucormycosis, especially if confined to lungsLipid amphotericin B is the mainstay of therapy; posaconazol is poorly absorbed, considered second line

Mucor species generally resistant to azoles (voriconazole has no activity against them)

Echinocandins (Caspofungin) useful as salvage therapy

CandidiasisAll patients with invasive disease or dissemination; important to reverse factors affecting immune status

Expert recommendations and clinical practice guidelines do not recommend antifungal treatment facing isolation in respiratory samples regardless the number of positive samples[10]

Rapid tapering of immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids; important to remove indwelling infected intravenous lines or urinary catheters in setting of hematogenous spread Amphotericin B is mainstay

Flucytosine may be of benefit when added to amphotericin B

Fluconazole use in pulmonary disease not studied but is effective in hepatosplenic candidiasis and candidemia

Echinocandins may be useful alternatives

SporotrichosisManagement should be based in clinico-radiological manifestations; two presentations of pulmonary sporotrichosis: non-cavitary disease (multifocal) and cavitary disease (primary)[11] Surgical interventions when presence of cavitations and initial medical therapies have failed; used as adjunctive therapyItraconazole as first line agent in mild to moderate cases

Amphotericin B first line in life threatening conditions