Polyarteritis Nodosa

Back

Background

Classic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN or c-PAN) is a systemic vasculitis characterized by necrotizing inflammatory lesions that affect medium-sized and small muscular arteries, preferentially at vessel bifurcations.[1] These lesions result in microaneurysm formation, aneurysmal rupture with hemorrhage, thrombosis, and, consequently, organ ischemia or infarction.[2]

Kussmaul and Maier first described PAN in 1866. The autopsy of a patient with fever, weight loss, abdominal pain, and polyneuropathy revealed areas of focal inflammatory exudations that gave rise to palpable nodules along the course of medium-sized arteries.[3]

PAN, like other vasculitides, affects multiple systems and has protean manifestations, although it most commonly affects skin (see the image below), joints, peripheral nerves, the gut, and the kidney.[4] The lungs are usually spared with PAN. A typical PAN patient might present with fever, night sweats, weight loss, skin ulcerations or tender nodules, and severe muscle and joint pains developing over weeks or months. (See Etiology, Presentation, and Workup.)



View Image

Nonspecific, firm, tender subcutaneous nodules without livedo reticularis and/or systemic involvement may be the first sign of polyarteritis nodosa (P....

See Cutaneous Clues to Accurately Diagnosing Rheumatologic Disease, a Critical Images slideshow, to help recognize cutaneous manifestations of rheumatologic diseases. Also see the slideshow Vasculitis: Case Presentations for more information on clinical, histologic, and radiographic imaging findings in various forms of vasculitis. For information on pediatric PAN, see Childhood Polyarteritis Nodosa.

Insight into PAN requires some understanding of how this rare disease has been defined. Periarteritis nodosa was a term used from the mid-1800s to the 1900s to describe a spectrum of systemic vasculitic disorders, including diseases that manifested as arterial aneurysms, as well as those that caused diffuse necrotizing glomerulonephritis.[5, 6] The term periarteritis nodosa was changed to polyarteritis nodosa in the mid-1900s to reflect the transmural inflammation of arteries caused by this disorder.[7]

The understanding of vasculitides continued to increase by the 1980s with the discovery of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs). Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA; formerly called microscopic polyarteritis) is an ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis that has some features similar to those of classic PAN, with the additional involvement of renal glomeruli and pulmonary capillaries.

Features of PAN

In 1990, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) established criteria for research purposes in order to differentiate PAN from other forms of vasculitis.[8] A committee of ACR physicians selected 10 disease features of PAN; in order for PAN to be diagnosed, at least 3 of the 10 ACR criteria should be present when a radiographic or pathological diagnosis of vasculitis is made[8] (see Presentation and Workup):

The strong association of MPA with ANCA, as well as the pathologic and clinical differences between MPA and PAN, demonstrate that PAN and MPA are likely separate disorders. It was not until 1994 that histologic criteria to distinguish PAN from MPA were defined at the international Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC).[9] According to the CHCC criteria, the presence of vasculitis in arterioles, venules, and capillaries defines the diagnosis of MPA (although small- and medium-sized arteries may also be involved in MPA) and excludes the diagnosis of PAN. (See Presentation, DDx, and Workup.)

Stages

PAN is divided into subacute, acute, and chronic stages. In the subacute stage, infiltration of mononuclear cells becomes more prominent, while in the acute stage, polymorphonuclear neutrophils infiltrate all layers of the vessel wall. (See Etiology.)

In the chronic stage, fibrinoid necrosis of the vessels causes thrombosis and tissue infarction. Aneurysmal dilatations of the involved arteries, as large as 1 cm in size, are characteristic findings of PAN. Kidney lesions show predominant arteritis without glomerulonephritis; however, in patients with severe hypertension, glomerulosclerosis may be superimposed with glomerulonephritis. Pulmonary arteries are not involved, and bronchial artery involvement is uncommon.

Patient education

Patients should understand that PAN can be a progressive systemic disease, and further complications and the involvement of other organ systems are quite common. Many patients attempt to discontinue their medications after initial symptomatic improvement, owing to the potential for adverse effects. Therefore, the benefits of medical treatments should be discussed clearly with the patient, in addition to the risks associated with the long-term use of immunosuppressants. The use of these medications necessitates close monitoring for many years to come. (See Treatment and Medication.)

Pathophysiology

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) spares large vessels (the aorta and its major branches), the smallest vessels (capillaries and small arterioles), and the venous system.[7] Vascular lesions affect medium-sized muscular arteries and occur mainly at bifurcations and branch points.

Inflammation may start in the vessel intima and progress to include the entire arterial wall, destroying the internal and external elastic lamina, resulting in fibrinoid necrosis.[7] Aneurysms develop in the weakened vessel, carrying a subsequent risk for rupture and hemorrhage. Thrombi may develop at the site of the lesions. As lesions progress, proliferation of the intima or media may result in obstruction and subsequent tissue ischemia or infarction.[10]

Etiology

Hepatitis B and PAN

The pathogenesis of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is unknown, and no animal model is available for study. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is strongly linked with PAN. Evidence for immune complex–induced disease is confined to HBV-related PAN; the role of immune complexes in non-HBV-related PAN remains unclear.[7]

Impaired function of endothelial cells may be part of idiopathic PAN or a consequence of it; in HBV-PAN, virus replication may directly injure the vessel wall.[11] Endothelial dysfunction can perpetuate the inflammation through cytokine and adhesion molecule production.[10]

HBV-associated vasculitis almost always takes the form of PAN. HBV-PAN may occur at any time during the course of acute or chronic hepatitis B infection, although it typically occurs within 6 months of infection.[11]

The activity of HBV-PAN does not parallel that of the hepatitis, and symptoms are the same as those of idiopathic PAN. Small studies have found that gastrointestinal manifestations, malignant hypertension, renal infarction, and orchiepididymitis were more common in HBV-PAN.[11]

HBV was once the cause of up to 30% of PAN cases.[12] Widespread use of the hepatitis B vaccine has significantly decreased the incidence of HBV-PAN, which is now estimated to account for less than 8% of all PAN cases.[13]

Genetic associations

Loss-of-function mutations in CECR1 (alsoknown as ADA2), the gene that encodes adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2), have been associated with a spectrum of vascular and inflammatory phenotypes that includes polyarteritis nodosa.[14]  Navon Elkan and colleagues identified six families with multiple cases of systemic and cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa, most of which had onset during childhood. In all the families, disease was traced to recessive mutations in CECR1 that resulted in reduced activity of ADA2.[15]

Possible roles of ADA2 include regulation of the proliferation of activated T cells and macrophages and the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages. Reduction in ADA2 activity  may affect the adenosine inflammatory-response pathway.[15]

Similarly, Gonzalez Santiago et al report two siblings with novel compound heterozygous mutations in CECR1 who were diagnosed with cutaneous PAN in early childhood.[16]

In a study of patients with early-onset livedo reticularis and/or hemorrhagic/ischemic strokes in the context of inflammation or PAN, Caorsi et al detected biallelic homozygous or compound heterozygous CECR1 mutations in 15 of 48 patients from 43 families. In patients with CECR1 mutations, the mean age of onset of disease was 24 months (6 months to 7 years).[17]

Other disease associations

Controversy has surrounded the potential association of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with PAN. HCV may be linked to cutaneous PAN, a benign, limited form of PAN. In a study of 16 patients with cutaneous PAN, 5 tested positive for hepatitis C.[18] HCV-associated PAN has also been described in 31 patients included in a larger 161 patient cohort with HCV-related vasculitis in France.[19] Despite the presence of serum cryoglobulins, these patients were diagnosed with HCV-PAN on the basis of typical histopathologic features of PAN and/or the presence of microaneurysms and/or multiple stenoses on abdominal and/or renal angiography.

A number of other infectious organisms have been reported in association with PAN or PAN-like diseases, but causal evidence is inconsistent. These organisms include varicella-zoster virus, parvovirus B-19, cytomegalovirus, human T-cell leukemia virus, streptococcal species, Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas species, Yersinia species, Toxoplasma gondii, Rickettsiae, trichinosis, and sarcosporidiosis.[20, 21] Recently, reports of associations with PAN and human immunodeficiency virus[22] and cutaneous PAN and tuberculosis[23] have been published as well.

Some syndromes, including rheumatic diseases, malignancies, and infections have been associated with clinical syndromes indistinguishable from idiopathic PAN. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Sjögren syndrome have been associated with PAN. Notably, the incidence of RA-associated vasculitis has decreased greatly since the 1980s, likely attributable to improvements in the management of RA.[24] Cutaneous PAN occurring with HLA-B39 spondyloarthritis,[25] common variable immunodeficiency,[26] and psoriatic arthritis in an 11-year-old boy[27] have also been reported.

Hematologic malignancies, such as hairy cell leukemia and, in one case, angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma, have been associated with PAN-like vasculitides.[28, 29]

Epidemiology

Occurrence in the United States

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare disease, with an incidence of about 3-4.5 cases per 100,000 population annually. Older estimates placed the prevalence as high as 7.7 cases per 100,000 population, for example, in a population of Alaskan Eskimos hyperendemic for HBV infection.[30]

International occurrence

Depending on the definitions used, the annual estimated incidence of PAN ranges from 1.6 cases per million in south Sweden to 4.6 cases per million in England to 30.7 cases per million adults in Paris, France.[12, 31]

Sex- and age-related demographics

PAN affects men more frequently than women (male-to-female ratio 1.6-2:1). PAN has been diagnosed in persons of every age; however, it is predominantly observed in individuals aged approximately 45-65 years.[10]

Prognosis

Idiopathic (non–HBV-related) PAN

Traditionally, it has been taught that relapses of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) are rare in individuals who completely recover. However, a study in Sweden described 10 patients with PAN, 57% of whom experienced relapse within 5 years.[31]

Recovery from neurologic deficits due to PAN can take up to 18 months. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement carries a worse prognosis than does peripheral nerve involvement.[20]

The prognosis is markedly worse in patients with acute abdominal syndromes characterized by extensive bowel involvement.[32] Multiple perforations may be found, relapses are common, and the postoperative course is complicated by infections and delayed healing. Surgery performed for cholecystitis or appendicitis does not appear to worsen prognosis in the same way.

The prognosis is better in patients with cutaneous PAN without systemic involvement. This disease is benign but tends to relapse. Kato et al reported higher risk of relapse in patients with cutaneous PAN who had pretreatment cutaneous ulcers, elevated C-reactive protein level, higher absolute neutrophil count (> 4.9 × 103/μL) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and higher systemic immune-inflammation index.[33]

In a retrospective study of 52 patients with childhood-onset PAN who were followed for a mean of 6.2 years, 27 patients (51.9%) were in clinical remission without medication at follow-up, 17 (32.7%) were in clinical remission while on medication, and six patients (11.6%) had a persistent or relapsing disease course. Two patients (3.8%) with severe cerebral involvement died. Cranial nerve palsy occurring during the course of disease was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis. Nephrogenic hypertension at disease onset and seizures during the course of the disease were significantly associated with irreversible organ damage.[34]

Relapses were more frequent among PAN patients with severe gastrointestinal involvement in a retrospective study of 69 pediatric patients, while a higher cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide was associated with a lower relapse risk. During follow-up with a median duration of 6 years, the relapse rate was 35%. The mortality rate was 4%.[35]

HBV-related PAN

Patients who seroconvert usually recover. Once HBV-PAN goes into remission, the risk of recurrence is very low (6% in one series).[13]

HCV-related PAN

One study found that in patients with HCV-related vasculitis, HCV-PAN exhibits a more severe clinical presentation but a higher rate of clinical remission.[19]

Complications

Permanent morbidity due to PAN is relatively rare, although patients may develop peripheral neuropathy, renal insufficiency or renal failure, and/or hypertension. Fever, weight loss, and malaise are present in 50% of patients; renal failure and hypertension, in 60%; arthritis, arthralgia, and myalgia, in 64%; and peripheral neuropathy and mononeuritis multiplex, in 51%.

Complications of PAN include the following:

Mortality

When left untreated, the 5-year survival rate of PAN is 13%. Nearly half of patients die within the first 3 months of onset. Corticosteroid treatment improves the 5-year survival rate to 50-60%. When the steroid is combined with other immunosuppressants, the 5-year survival rate may increase to greater than 80%.

Death associated with PAN occurs as a result of uncontrolled vasculitis, infectious complications related to treatment-induced immunosuppression, and vascular complications of the disease, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. The mortality rate is higher in patients with acute abdominal syndromes.[32] Intractable hypertension contributes to morbidity and mortality rates.

In a cohort of 161 patients with HCV-related vasculitis, there was no significant difference in mortality between HCV-MC patients and those with HCV-PAN. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in HCV-PAN patients were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1), 89% (95% CI, 0.75-0.98), and 89% (95% CI, 0.75-1), respectively.[19]

Prognostic score

In a prospective study of 342 patients with PAN, Guillevin et al found 5 factors associated with poor prognosis. They devised a 5-factors score (FFS) to predict survival and help guide treatment decisions.[43] The presence of any of the following 5 factors predicts an increased likelihood of mortality:

When the FFS is zero, the predicted mortality rate at 5 years is 11.9%. When the FFS is 1, the mortality rate is 25.9%, and when the FFS is 2 or more, the mortality rate is 45.9%.

History

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is an acute multisystem disease with a relatively short prodrome (ie, weeks to months).[7] Delays in diagnosis are not uncommon. The spectrum of disease ranges from single-organ involvement to fulminant polyvisceral failure. Pertinent and common historical features of PAN include the following:

Constitutional and musculoskeletal symptoms

Constitutional and musculoskeletal symptoms of PAN include the following:

Central nervous system symptoms

Transient symptoms of cerebral ischemia, including typical spells of transient monocular blindness, are the most common presenting CNS deficits of PAN. Cerebral arteritis usually presents late in the course of the disease, usually in the second to third year of the vasculitis. Cerebral arteritis may cause arterial thrombosis with cerebral ischemia or intraparenchymal or subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Global CNS dysfunction with encephalopathy and seizures results from metabolic derangements secondary to multiple organ failure. Acute or subacute myelopathy with paraparesis can occur at any cord level. Myelopathy may result, although rarely, from cord compression by an extramedullary hematoma secondary to a ruptured spinal aneurysm. Although CNS lesions usually occur 2-3 years after the onset of PAN, earlier CNS involvement has been reported.

Peripheral nervous system symptoms

Peripheral neuropathy develops in as many as 60% of patients. Vasculitic neuropathy is often asymmetrical and presents as (1) mononeuritis multiplex, (2) distal polyneuropathy, or (3) cutaneous neuropathy. It can take the form of a pure motor, pure sensory, or mixed sensorimotor polyneuropathy.

Cutaneous symptoms

Dermatologic symptoms are very common in PAN, and about 40% of patients manifest with skin lesions including rash, purpura, gangrene, nodules, cutaneous infarcts, livido reticularis, and Raynaud phenomenon. Skin involvement, which can be painful, occurs most frequently on the legs.

Gastrointestinal symptoms

GI involvement usually presents as nonspecific symptoms and signs such as abdominal pain (which may be postprandial) and nausea and vomiting, with or without obvious GI bleeding. Rare and more serious complications of PAN include bowel infarction and perforation, cholecystitis, hepatic infarction, or pancreatic infarction.

Renal symptoms

About 60% of patients with PAN have renal involvement. Flank pain may be present. Ischemic changes in the glomeruli and renal artery vasculitis can cause renal failure, hypertension, or both. A small percentage of patients may require dialysis.

Additional symptoms

Less common symptoms reported in PAN include the following:

Physical Examination

Because polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic disease, a complete examination is essential for diagnosis.

The emergence of multiple mononeuropathies in persons with PAN is an important clue to an underlying arteritis. Evidence of organ or extremity ischemia, including hypertension and renal insufficiency (renovascular disease), are further clues to the diagnosis. Lung involvement is rare and its presence should prompt a search for an alternative to PAN as the diagnosis.

Constitutional and musculoskeletal symptoms

Fever may be observed; Raynaud phenomenon may occur. A nondeforming, asymmetrical arthritis, usually involving the larger joints of the lower extremities, has been reported in PAN.

Neurologic symptoms

Neurologic symptoms in PAN include the following:

Cutaneous symptoms

Cutaneous symptoms in PAN include the following[7] (see the images below):

Gastrointestinal symptoms

Gastrointestinal symptoms include the following[32] :

Renal symptoms

Renal symptoms include the following:

Cardiac symptoms

Cardiac symptoms include the following:

Ophthalmologic symptoms

Ophthalmologic symptoms of PAN include the following:

Additional symptoms

The patient may experience testicular tenderness. Psychiatric symptoms, specifically psychosis and depression, may occur.

Unusual presentations

PAN has been reported to present in the muscles alone. One patient had features suggesting polymyositis[47] ; an additional patient had disease limited to the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles of his calf.[48]

Approach Considerations

Evidence of peripheral neuropathy should be sought carefully with history and electromyography (EMG), since it is a common complication of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), being found in as many as 60% of patients. Mononeuritis multiplex is the most common form of PAN neuropathy, but other forms can be present.

Many neurologic and systemic disorders can present with headache. Pathologic headaches are often difficult to differentiate from benign headaches solely on clinical grounds. Severe, persistent headaches, with or without neurologic deficit, warrant complete neurologic evaluation, including brain-imaging studies.

Even though stroke is a late complication in many cases of PAN, it certainly can occur early. PAN and other vasculitic diseases should be considered in many patients with stroke with multiple foci or a combination of hemorrhage and infarction.

Electroencephalography (EEG) may show nonspecific findings of generalized slow wave activity during periods of encephalopathy or toxic delirium.

Laboratory studies

Laboratory findings in PAN are nonspecific but can help to establish the systemic nature of the disease. Findings include the following:

Cryoglobulins, circulating immune complexes, and decreased levels of serum complement (ie, C3, C4) may be observed in patients with HBV-related PAN but are otherwise uncharacteristic of idiopathic PAN.

Cerebrospinal fluid findings often are usually normal in PAN, but polymorphonuclear pleocytosis can be seen when meningeal signs are present.

ANCA testing is rarely positive in PAN. If ANCA testing is positive, the tests more commonly show a perinuclear (rather than cytoplasmic) pattern and antibodies to proteinase-3 and myeloperoxidase will be negative.[7] Antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor are generally negative, but low positive titers may be detected.[7]

Imaging Studies

Angiography

Angiography should be considered if clinically involved tissue is inaccessible. Conventional angiography is preferred. Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography are not as sensitive for smaller abnormalities but can reveal larger aneurysms and stenoses.[20, 52]

Positive findings include aneurysms and stenoses of medium-sized vessels. (Note that these findings are not pathognomonic for PAN but rarely occur in MPA).[20]

Aneurysms are most commonly found in the kidney, liver, and mesenteric arteries, and their presence is associated with more severe and extensive disease.

Angiography has a higher yield in cases with evidence of intra-abdominal involvement, including clinical symptoms or signs and laboratory abnormalities of liver or renal function. Arteriograms reveal microaneurysms in the small- and medium-sized arteries of the kidneys and abdominal viscera.

For images and discussion, see Imaging in Polyarteritis Nodosa

Other studies

Turkish investigators report on the use of Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of seven cases of childhood PAN. These authors recommend that Doppler ultrasound be considered in the first-line approach in the diagnosis of PAN, particularly in children.[53]

Computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the GI tract may show nonspecific abnormal findings, including bowel wall thickening, mesenteric vascular engorgement, ascites, bowel obstruction, or diffuse mucosal fold thickening. For PAN with CNS involvement, new techniques, including susceptibility for blood, diffusion, and perfusion-weighted images, make MRI a very powerful modality for differentiating intracranial hemorrhage from potentially reversible ischemia (since PAN lesions are typically irreversible and progressive).

Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) can be useful in revealing axonal nerve involvement and identifying asymmetry in nerve involvement. EMG/NCS can be used to guide a nerve biopsy, if necessary.[20, 45]

Biopsy

When possible, a biopsy sample of involved, accessible tissue should be collected to aid in the diagnosis. The most accessible tissue sites for biopsy include the skin, sural nerve, testes, and skeletal muscle. The results of a retrospective study suggest muscle biopsy may be helpful for the diagnosis of systemic vasculitides, even in the absence of myalgias or creatine kinase level elevation.[54] Kidney biopsy carries a risk of aneurysmal rupture and bleeding.

Biopsies should be performed correctly to allow for adequate sampling of medium-sized arteries. Biopsy samples of skin nodules or ulcers should be collected at the edges and include deep dermis and subcutaneous fat.[7] In addition, nearby central ulcer areas, including subcutaneous tissue, should be included to increase diagnostic yield.[55]

Biopsy of small arteries from the abdominal viscera in conjunction with arteriography facilitates identification of the vasculitis.

Combined nerve and muscle biopsy is preferred. Biopsy of the sural nerve should be full-thickness to include epineural vessels.[45]

Histologic Findings

Histology reveals a focal necrotizing arteritis of generally mixed cellular infiltrate within the vessel wall. Nerve biopsy characteristically reveals axonal degeneration and fiber loss. Segmental demyelination may also be seen.[45]

When an inflammatory infiltrate is present around a vessel wall without necrotizing changes, features on nerve biopsy that strongly suggest angiopathic nerve injury include Wallerian degeneration and fiber loss in part of a fascicle, perineural necrosis, and neoangiogenesis around the epineurium or perineurium.[45] An occlusion of a muscular artery and leukocytic infiltrate is seen in the slide below.



View Image

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is characterized by fibrinoid necrosis of the arterial wall with a leukocytic infiltrate. In this slide, a large, pale occl....

Despite a general recommendation to avoid kidney biopsy owing to a risk of aneurysmal rupture and bleeding, renal biopsy abnormalities in PAN patients have been described. Biopsies from 15 patients with PAN with no or mild renal involvement at study entry only showed abnormalities in one patient. This patient, with HBV-related PAN, had renal vasculitis and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN).[56]

Staging

The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and disease extent index have been validated to assess the level of disease activity in children with vasculitis, including PAN.[57]

Approach Considerations

The treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has improved dramatically. Previously, untreated PAN was usually fatal within weeks to months, with mortality often associated with kidney failure, cardiac complications, or gastrointestinal (GI) complications. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are critical in PAN.

Currently, corticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment. The addition of cyclophosphamide is the standard of care for patients with idiopathic PAN whose disease is steroid refractory or includes major organ involvement. This combination can provide prolonged survival for these patients.

Cyclophosphamide is not routinely recommended in hepatitis B–related PAN, as the use of steroids with cyclophosphamide in these patients has been demonstrated to enhance viral replication. Instead, treatment for hepatitis B–related PAN consists of schemes that include corticosteroids with antiviral agents and plasmapheresis. Antiviral drugs used include vidarabine or interferon alpha-2b.

Biologic agents have been investigated in patients with steroid-refractory and recurrent PAN. Case reports have described response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors,[17] including infliximab[58, 59] and etanercept.[60]  The interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab has been used successfully in refractory cases.[61] Successful use of the anti-CD20 agent rituximab in an adult with refractory PAN has also been reported.[62] Plasma exchange has been used in a few patients with severe PAN.[63]

Surgical care

Surgery may be necessary for GI manifestations of PAN, including bowel ischemia, cholecystitis, and appendicitis. Microcoil embolization of cerebral aneurysm may be indicated. Postsurgical care may be needed for patients with PAN who develop bowel infarction.

Idiopathic (Non–HBV-Related) PAN

The optimal management for polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has not been established. Trial results in PAN are difficult to interpret, as many were conducted prior to the creation of the CHCC definition and included patients with MPA and Churg-Strauss syndrome. Corticosteroids have shown a clear benefit in these vasculitides, resulting in improvement of 5-year survival rates to 50%.[64] Cyclophosphamide may improve the survival rate in patients with severe disease.[65]

Glucocorticoids

No standard regimen for steroid dosing exists in PAN. It is common practice to use high-dose oral prednisone at 1 mg/kg/day.[65] Methylprednisolone could also be given, for example, at a pulse dose of 1,000 mg intravenously daily, repeated over 3 days, prior to initiating oral prednisone.

Tapering of the prednisone can begin as early as 1 month later if the patient's clinical status and ESR normalize. Prednisone taper can continue over the next 12 months until it has been stopped.

When prednisone is combined with cyclophosphamide, the steroid dose is tapered more rapidly, if possible, to reduce the increased risk of infection.

Patients receiving long-term steroid therapy are at risk for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be given. Bisphosphonates are indicated in patients in whom glucocorticoids are being initiated.

Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide therapy may be initiated in patients with serious involvement of major organs or steroid-refractory PAN.[7] Cyclophosphamide can be given as a monthly intravenous (IV) pulse or as a daily pill. IV pulse cyclophosphamide has a rapid onset of action, allows a lower cumulative dose to be administered, and exposes the patient to potential toxicity for shorter periods than an oral regimen. In some cases, however, daily oral cyclophosphamide is needed for a satisfactory therapeutic response.

Administration of IV or oral cyclophosphamide requires close monitoring of blood counts and renal function. Dosing should be adjusted accordingly.

Potential toxicities of cyclophosphamide to be discussed with patients include an increased risk of bladder cancer, hematologic malignancies, hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder fibrosis, bone marrow suppression, and gonadal failure.

Guillevin et al suggested that patients with a 5-factors score (FFS) of zero may be treated successfully with corticosteroids alone, with cyclophosphamide administered only as second-line treatment in cases of persistent disease, relapse, or inability to taper steroids. They recommend that, cyclophosphamide should be part of the initial regimen in combination with steroids in patients with an FFS of 1 or more.[43]

Therapy with steroids and cyclophosphamide places patients at high risk for infections. Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is encouraged in these patients.

HBV-Related PAN

PAN in the setting of HBV infection is a special situation. Standard therapies for PAN, including glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide, enhance prognosis and control of the polyarteritis. However, they are also associated with persistent HBV infection and failure to seroconvert from hepatitis B surface antigen to hepatitis B surface antibody and from hepatitis B e antigen to hepatitis B e antibody. Thus, antiviral medications are essential in the treatment of these patients.

Guillevin and colleagues studied therapeutic strategies, including steroids, antivirals, and plasma exchange (plasmapheresis), and found the regimens below to be successful.[66]

Prednisone (1 mg/kg/d) is administered for the first week. Alternatively, methylprednisolone pulse (15 mg/kg/d for 1-3 d) is used in severely ill patients. Steroids are then tapered rapidly and withdrawn at the end of week two.

Antiviral agents are begun after steroid withdrawal to enhance immunologic clearance of HBV-infected hepatocytes and favor seroconversion. Agents studied included vidarabine,[67] which was replaced by interferon-α2b,[68] and later by lamivudine.[66] It is recommended that lamivudine be continued for 6 months or stopped at the time of seroconversion to hepatitis B surface antibody. (These recommendations may change; combination treatment and prolonged courses of antivirals are currently being investigated in the management of HBV).

Plasma exchanges are used as adjunctive therapy with antivirals. Plasma exchange is performed 3 times per week for 3 weeks, twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then once weekly. Plasma exchanges are stopped once seroconversion from hepatitis B e antigen to hepatitis B e antibody occurs or after clinical recovery is maintained for 2-3 months.

Isolated case reports have demonstrated benefit from the combination of interferon-α2b and lamivudine[69, 70] or the addition of famciclovir and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients in whom antiviral therapy alone could not seroconvert and clear their HBV infection.[71]

Critically ill patients who are not responding to treatment may require prolonged steroids and cyclophosphamide in the setting of lamivudine therapy.[66]

HCV-Related PAN

Given that the existence of this entity has been controversial, limited data exist to support appropriate treatment. In a French cohort of 161 patients with HCV-associated vasculitis, 31 patients were diagnosed with PAN. Over half the patients were treated with antiviral therapy and nearly half received corticosteroids. Other treatments included rituximab (22.6%), plasmapheresis (35.5%), and immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide or azathioprine (16.1%).[57] More patients with HCV-related PAN achieved clinical remission in this group than those with HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia (79.3% vs 57.5%). Remission was closely correlated with successful HCV clearance. A higher frequency of relapse was seen in the HCV-related PAN patients than in HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia patients (18% at 1 year vs 45% at 1 year).

Cutaneous PAN

As with systemic PAN, the optimal management for cutaneous PAN has not been established. Expert recommendations include agents such as NSAIDs, colchicine, and dapsone, if possible.[72] In more severe cases, steroids and stronger immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide may be used. Success with mycophenolate mofetil in 2 siblings with treatment-refractory, childhood-onset PAN has also been reported.[73] Methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil have been reported as effective therapeutic options after remission is achieved.[74]

Reports of success with other agents such as mizoribine,[75] mycophenolate, and pentoxifylline[76] have been published.

Consultations

Consultation with a rheumatologist is appropriate. Other consultants should be sought according to organ system involvement and include the following:

Long-Term Monitoring

Patients with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) should be monitored closely for evidence of relapse or symptoms indicating new organ involvement. Cyclophosphamide dosing should be adjusted according to the level of immunosuppression. The patient’s complete blood count (CBC) should be checked 10-14 days after IV cyclophosphamide is administered and every 2 weeks once oral cyclophosphamide is initiated.

Medication Summary

Immunosuppression continues to be the standard therapy for polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (in the case of steroid-refractory disease or major organ involvement) can prolong survival for patients with idiopathic PAN.In contrast, for hepatitis B–related PAN, treatment consists of corticosteroids for early, initial control followed by plasmapheresis and antiviral agents. Stronger immunosuppression using a combinations of steroids and cyclophosphamide is typically avoided in these cases as it can enhance viral replication.

Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol, Medrol, A-Methapred)

Clinical Context:  Methylprednisolone is a highly potent synthetic glucocorticoid that causes diverse metabolic effects and modifies the body's immune responses to various stimuli.

Prednisone

Clinical Context:  Prednisone, a synthetic glucocorticoid analog, acts as a potent immunosuppressant via its effects on multiple cell types and cytokines. It has anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and, often, analgesic effects in addition to often-adverse metabolic effects.

Class Summary

These agents have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. They modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.

Cyclophosphamide

Clinical Context:  As an alkylating agent, the mechanism of action of the active metabolites of cyclophosphamide may involve cross-linking of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which may interfere with the growth of normal and neoplastic cells.

Methotrexate (Rheumatrex, Trexall)

Clinical Context:  Methotrexate is a potent anti-inflammatory medication with antiproliferative effects used as a steroid-sparing agent.

Class Summary

These agents are chemically related to nitrogen mustards. Because of its immunomodulatory properties, cyclophosphamide is used in conjunction with glucocorticoids, thus reducing the need for higher corticosteroid doses.

What is polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which areas of the body are commonly affected by polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How has the understanding of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) evolved since the systemic vasculitic disorders were first described?What are the ACR diagnostic criteria for polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How is polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) distinguished from microscopic polyangiitis (MPA)?What are the stages of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How can providers improve treatment compliance in patients with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the pathophysiology of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the relationship between polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)?What are the genetic features of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which diseases are associated with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How common is polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) in the US?What is the international incidence of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the sex-and age-related demographics of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the prognosis of idiopathic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the prognosis of HBV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the prognosis of HCV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How common are complications of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the complications of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the mortality of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the factors that predict an increased risk of mortality in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the typical patient history in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the constitutional and musculoskeletal symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the CNS symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the peripheral nervous system symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the cutaneous symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the GI symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the renal symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the uncommon symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the cutaneous symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the role of a physical exam in the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which signs of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) are noted in the physical exam?What are the neurologic symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the GI symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the renal symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the cardiac symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the ophthalmologic symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are additional symptoms of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the unusual presentations of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the diagnostic considerations in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the differential diagnoses for Polyarteritis Nodosa?What are the approach considerations in the workup of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which lab study findings are associated with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the role of angiography in the diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which imaging studies are indicated in the workup of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) besides angiography?What is the role of biopsy in the workup of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the histologic findings in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which instrument is used to stage the level of disease activity in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) in children?What are the approach considerations in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How is idiopathic polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) treated?What is the role of glucocorticoids in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the role of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What are the complications of steroids and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How is HBV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) treated?How are steroids administered to patients in the treatment of HBV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How are antiviral agents administered to patients in the treatment of HBV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?How is plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) administered to patients in the treatment of HBV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the treatment of choice for HCV-related polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What is the treatment of choice for cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which specialist consultations are indicated in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?What long-term monitoring is indicated in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which drugs are used in the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)?Which medications in the drug class Antineoplastic agents are used in the treatment of Polyarteritis Nodosa?Which medications in the drug class Corticosteroids are used in the treatment of Polyarteritis Nodosa?

Author

Dana Jacobs-Kosmin, MD, FACP, Attending Physician, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Einstein Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

J Mark Jackson, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine/Dermatology, Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Herbert S Diamond, MD, Visiting Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center; Chairman Emeritus, Department of Internal Medicine, Western Pennsylvania Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Mahendra Agraharkar, MD, MBBS, FACP, FASN, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine; President and CEO, Space City Associates of Nephrology

Mahendra Agraharkar, MD, MBBS, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Nephrology, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: South Shore DaVita Dialysis Center Ownership interest

Bruce A Baethge, MD, Faculty, Texas A&M Medical School

Bruce A Baethge, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha; American College of Physicians; American College of Rheumatology and Arthritis Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Kanwarpreet Baweja, MD, Fellow in Nephrology, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Texas Health Science Center

Kanwarpreet Baweja, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, Medical Council of India, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Steve Chung, MD, Director, Clinical Epilepsy Research, Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurology, Residency Director, Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute

Steven Chung, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Epilepsy Society, American Medical Association, California Medical Assocation, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Elliot Goldberg, MD Dean of the Western Pennsylvania Clinical Campus, Professor, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine

Elliot Goldberg, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, and American College of Rheumatology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

B Mark Keegan, MD, FRCPC, Assistant Professor of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Master's Faculty, Mayo Graduate School; Consultant, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester

B Mark Keegan, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Medical Association, and Minnesota Medical Association

Disclosure: Novartis Consulting fee; Bionest Consulting fee

Howard S Kirshner, MD, Professor of Neurology, Psychiatry and Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vice Chairman, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Director, Vanderbilt Stroke Center; Program Director, Stroke Service, Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital; Consulting Staff, Department of Neurology, Nashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Howard S Kirshner, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Neurology, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Neurological Association, American Society of Neurorehabilitation, National Stroke Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Carlos J Lozada, MD Director of Rheumatology Fellowship Program, Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Miami, Leonard M Miller School of Medicine

Carlos J Lozada, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and American College of Rheumatology

Disclosure: Pfizer Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Amgen Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Christopher Luzzio, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin at Madison School of Medicine and Public Health

Christopher Luzzio, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Vasanta P Weiss, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Nephrology, University of Virginia Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Stanton M, Bhimji SS. Polyarteritis Nodosa. 2018 Jan. [View Abstract]
  2. Ozen S. The changing face of polyarteritis nodosa and necrotizing vasculitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Jun. 13 (6):381-386. [View Abstract]
  3. Kussmaul A, Maier R. Ueber eine bisher nicht beschriebene eigenthümliche Arterienerkrankung (Periarteritis nodosa), die mit Morbus Brightii und rapid fortschreitender allgemeiner Muskellähmung einhergeht. Dtsch Arch Klin Med. 1866. 1:484-518.
  4. Forbess L, Bannykh S. Polyarteritis nodosa. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015. 41 (1):33-46, vii. [View Abstract]
  5. Matteson EL. A history of early investigation in polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Aug. 12(4):294-302. [View Abstract]
  6. Davson J, Ball J, Platt R. The kidney in periarteritis nodosa. Q J Med. 1948 Jul. 17(67):175-202. [View Abstract]
  7. Stone JH. Polyarteritis nodosa. JAMA. 2002 Oct 2. 288(13):1632-9. [View Abstract]
  8. Lightfoot RW Jr, Michel BA, Bloch DA, Hunder GG, Zvaifler NJ, McShane DJ. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug. 33(8):1088-93. [View Abstract]
  9. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K. Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides. Proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Feb. 37(2):187-92. [View Abstract]
  10. Colmegna I, Maldonado-Cocco JA. Polyarteritis nodosa revisited. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Aug. 7(4):288-96. [View Abstract]
  11. Trepo C, Guillevin L. Polyarteritis nodosa and extrahepatic manifestations of HBV infection: the case against autoimmune intervention in pathogenesis. J Autoimmun. 2001 May. 16(3):269-74. [View Abstract]
  12. Mahr A, Guillevin L, Poissonnet M, Aymé S. Prevalences of polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, Wegener's granulomatosis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome in a French urban multiethnic population in 2000: a capture-recapture estimate. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb 15. 51(1):92-9. [View Abstract]
  13. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Cohen P, Sauvaget F, Jarrousse B, Lortholary O, et al. Polyarteritis nodosa related to hepatitis B virus. A prospective study with long-term observation of 41 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1995 Sep. 74(5):238-53. [View Abstract]
  14. Zhou Q, Yang D, Ombrello AK, Zavialov AV, Toro C, et al. Early-onset stroke and vasculopathy associated with mutations in ADA2. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6. 370 (10):911-20. [View Abstract]
  15. Navon Elkan P, Pierce SB, Segel R, Walsh T, Barash J, et al. Mutant adenosine deaminase 2 in a polyarteritis nodosa vasculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6. 370 (10):921-31. [View Abstract]
  16. Gonzalez Santiago TM, Zavialov A, Saarela J, Seppanen M, Reed AM, Abraham RS, et al. Dermatologic Features of ADA2 Deficiency in Cutaneous Polyarteritis Nodosa. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Nov 1. 151 (11):1230-4. [View Abstract]
  17. Caorsi R, Penco F, Grossi A, Insalaco A, Omenetti A, et al. ADA2 deficiency (DADA2) as an unrecognised cause of early onset polyarteritis nodosa and stroke: a multicentre national study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May 18. [View Abstract]
  18. Soufir N, Descamps V, Crickx B. Hepatitis C virus infection in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: a retrospective study of 16 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Aug. 135(8):1001-2. [View Abstract]
  19. Saadoun D, Terrier B, Semoun O, Sene D, Maisonobe T, Musset L, et al. Hepatitis C virus-associated polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Oct 27. [View Abstract]
  20. Hughes LB, Bridges SL Jr. Polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis: etiologic and diagnostic considerations. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2002 Feb. 4(1):75-82. [View Abstract]
  21. Somer T, Finegold SM. Vasculitides associated with infections, immunization, and antimicrobial drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Apr. 20(4):1010-36. [View Abstract]
  22. Patel N, Patel N, Khan T, Patel N, Espinoza LR. HIV infection and clinical spectrum of associated vasculitides. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011 Dec. 13(6):506-12. [View Abstract]
  23. Imanishi H, Tsuruta D, Oshimo T, Sowa J, Mizuno N, Nakagawa K, et al. Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa induced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Dermatol. 2012 Aug. 39(8):738-9. [View Abstract]
  24. Watts RA, Mooney J, Lane SE, Scott DG. Rheumatoid vasculitis: becoming extinct?. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jul. 43(7):920-3. [View Abstract]
  25. Nakano H, Ooka S, Shibata T, Ogawa H, Ito H, Takakuwa Y, et al. Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa associated with HLA-B39-positive undifferentiated spondyloarthritis in a Japanese patient. Mod Rheumatol. 2012 Sep. 22(5):783-6. [View Abstract]
  26. Pagnini I, Simonini G, Lippi F, Azzari C, Cimaz R. Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and common variable immunodeficiency: a previously unreported association. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb. 30(1 Suppl 70):S169. [View Abstract]
  27. Oulego-Erroz I, Gautreaux-Minaya S, Martinez-Sáenz de Jubera J, Naranjo-Vivas D, Fernéndez-Hernández S, Muñíz-Fontán M. Coexistence of polyarteritis nodosa and psoriatic arthritis in a child: an unreported association: Polyarteritis nodosa and Psoriatic arthitritis. Eur J Pediatr. 2011 Sep. 170(9):1213-5. [View Abstract]
  28. Hasler P, Kistler H, Gerber H. Vasculitides in hairy cell leukemia. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Oct. 25(2):134-42. [View Abstract]
  29. Ambrosio MR, Rocca BJ, Ginori A, Onorati M, Fabbri A, Carmellini M, et al. Renal infarction due to polyarteritis nodosa in a patient with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a case report and a brief review of the literature. Diagn Pathol. 2012 May 8. 7:50. [View Abstract]
  30. McMahon BJ, Heyward WL, Templin DW, Clement D, Lanier AP. Hepatitis B-associated polyarteritis nodosa in Alaskan Eskimos: clinical and epidemiologic features and long-term follow-up. Hepatology. 1989 Jan. 9(1):97-101. [View Abstract]
  31. Selga D, Mohammad A, Sturfelt G, Segelmark M. Polyarteritis nodosa when applying the Chapel Hill nomenclature--a descriptive study on ten patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Oct. 45(10):1276-81. [View Abstract]
  32. Levine SM, Hellmann DB, Stone JH. Gastrointestinal involvement in polyarteritis nodosa (1986-2000): presentation and outcomes in 24 patients. Am J Med. 2002 Apr 1. 112(5):386-91. [View Abstract]
  33. Kato A, Hamada T, Miyake T, Morizane S, Hirai Y, Yamasaki O, et al. Clinical and Laboratory Markers Associated With Relapse in Cutaneous Polyarteritis Nodosa. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Aug 1. 154 (8):922-926. [View Abstract]
  34. Falcini F, La Torre F, Vittadello F, Rigante D, Martini G, Corona F, et al. Clinical overview and outcome in a cohort of children with polyarteritis nodosa. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 May-Jun. 32(3 Suppl 82):S134-7. [View Abstract]
  35. Eleftheriou D, Dillon MJ, Tullus K, Marks SD, Pilkington CA, Roebuck DJ, et al. Systemic polyarteritis nodosa in the young: a single-center experience over thirty-two years. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Sep. 65(9):2476-85. [View Abstract]
  36. Mahmood-Rao H, Ding T, Gandhi N. Gangrenous digital infarcts in a severe case of cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa. BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Jun 29. 2017:[View Abstract]
  37. Agarwal A, Bansal M, Pandey R, Swaminathan S. Bilateral subcapsular and perinephric hemorrhage as the initial presentation of polyarteritis nodosa. Intern Med. 2012. 51(9):1073-6. [View Abstract]
  38. Battula N, Tsapralis D, Morgan M, Mirza D. Spontaneous liver haemorrhage and haemobilia as initial presentation of undiagnosed polyarteritis nodosa. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 May. 94(4):e163-5. [View Abstract]
  39. Parent BA, Cho SW, Buck DG, Nalesnik MA, Gamblin TC. Spontaneous rupture of hepatic artery aneurysm associated with polyarteritis nodosa. Am Surg. 2010 Dec. 76(12):1416-9. [View Abstract]
  40. Yuce M, Davutoglu V, Sari I, Onat AM. Polyarteritis nodosa with multiple coronary aneurysms presenting as acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med Sci. 2011 May. 341(5):409. [View Abstract]
  41. Pagnoux C, Le Guern V, Goffinet F, Diot E, Limal N, Pannier E, et al. Pregnancies in systemic necrotizing vasculitides: report on 12 women and their 20 pregnancies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 May. 50(5):953-61. [View Abstract]
  42. Kocyigit I, Koyuncu S, Mavili E, Unal A, Tokmak TT, Cilan H. Unusual clinic presentation of polyarteritis nodosa: involvement of axillary and brachial artery. Ren Fail. 2011. 33(10):1043-5. [View Abstract]
  43. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Gayraud M, Cohen P, Jarrousse B, Lortholary O. Prognostic factors in polyarteritis nodosa and Churg-Strauss syndrome. A prospective study in 342 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996 Jan. 75(1):17-28. [View Abstract]
  44. Fernandes SR, Coimbra IB, Costallat LT. Uncommon features of polyarteritis nodosa: psychosis and angio-oedema. Clin Rheumatol. 1998. 17(4):353-6. [View Abstract]
  45. Griffin JW. Vasculitic neuropathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001 Nov. 27(4):751-60, vi. [View Abstract]
  46. Rosenberg MR, Parshley M, Gibson S, Wernick R. Central nervous system polyarteritis nodosa. West J Med. 1990 Nov. 153(5):553-6. [View Abstract]
  47. Haroon M, Bermingham N, Keohane C, Harney S. Polyarteritis nodosa presenting with clinical and radiologic features suggestive of polymyositis. Rheumatol Int. 2012 Apr. 32(4):1079-81. [View Abstract]
  48. Yang SN, Cho NS, Choi HS, Choi SJ, Yoon ES, Kim DH. Muscular polyarteritis nodosa. J Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Aug. 18(5):249-52. [View Abstract]
  49. Filippone EJ, Foy A, Galanis T, Pokuah M, Newman E, Lallas CD. Segmental arterial mediolysis: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Dec. 58(6):981-7. [View Abstract]
  50. Kermani TA, Ham EK, Camilleri MJ, Warrington KJ. Polyarteritis nodosa-like vasculitis in association with minocycline use: a single-center case series. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct. 42(2):213-21. [View Abstract]
  51. Bezier M, Perceau G, Reguiai Z, Remy-Leroux V, Tchen T, Durlach A. [Necrotic leg ulcers induced by vitamin K antagonists: five cases]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Oct. 138(10):657-63. [View Abstract]
  52. Higuchi T, Sugimoto N, Hayama M, Tanaka E. The usefulness of 3D-CT angiography in polyarteritis nodosa. Intern Med. 2012. 51(11):1449-50. [View Abstract]
  53. Özçakar ZB, Fitöz S, Yıldız AE, Yalçınkaya F. Childhood polyarteritis nodosa: diagnosis with non-invasive imaging techniques. Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jan. 36 (1):165-171. [View Abstract]
  54. Hervier B, Durant C, Masseau A, Ponge T, Hamidou M, Mussini JM. Use of muscle biopsies for diagnosis of systemic vasculitides. J Rheumatol. 2011 Mar. 38(3):470-4. [View Abstract]
  55. Ricotti C, Kowalczyk JP, Ghersi M, Nousari CH. The diagnostic yield of histopathologic sampling techniques in PAN-associated cutaneous ulcers. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Oct. 143(10):1334-6. [View Abstract]
  56. Gheita TA, Khairy NA, Nasrallah MM, Hussein H. Subclinical renal involvement in essential cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and classic polyarteritis nodosa. Joint Bone Spine. 2012 May. 79(3):274-80. [View Abstract]
  57. Demirkaya E, Ozen S, Pistorio A, Galasso R, Ravelli A, Hasija R. Performance of Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and disease extent index in childhood vasculitides. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb. 30(1 Suppl 70):S162-8. [View Abstract]
  58. Campanilho-Marques R, Ramos F, Canhão H, Fonseca JE. Remission induced by infliximab in a childhood polyarteritis nodosa refractory to conventional immunosuppression and rituximab. Joint Bone Spine. 2014 May. 81 (3):277-8. [View Abstract]
  59. Matsuo S, Hayashi K, Morimoto E, Kato A, Sada KE, Watanabe H, et al. The Successful Treatment of Refractory Polyarteritis Nodosa Using Infliximab. Intern Med. 2017. 56 (11):1435-1438. [View Abstract]
  60. Inoue N, Shimizu M, Mizuta M, Ikawa Y, Yachie A. Refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: Successful treatment with etanercept. Pediatr Int. 2017 Jun. 59 (6):751-752. [View Abstract]
  61. Krusche M, Ruffer N, Kötter I. Tocilizumab treatment in refractory polyarteritis nodosa: a case report and review of the literature. Rheumatol Int. 2018 Nov 21. [View Abstract]
  62. Seri Y, Shoda H, Hanata N, Nagafuchi Y, Sumitomo S, Fujio K, et al. A case of refractory polyarteritis nodosa successfully treated with rituximab. Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Mar 12. 1-3. [View Abstract]
  63. de Luna G, et al; French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG). Plasma exchanges for the treatment of severe systemic necrotizing vasculitides in clinical daily practice: Data from the French Vasculitis Study Group. J Autoimmun. 2015 Dec. 65:49-55. [View Abstract]
  64. Frohnert PP, Sheps SG. Long-term follow-up study of periarteritis nodosa. Am J Med. 1967 Jul. 43(1):8-14. [View Abstract]
  65. Gayraud M, Guillevin L, le Toumelin P, Cohen P, Lhote F, Casassus P. Long-term followup of polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome: analysis of four prospective trials including 278 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Mar. 44(3):666-75. [View Abstract]
  66. Guillevin L, Mahr A, Cohen P, Larroche C, Queyrel V, Loustaud-Ratti V, et al. Short-term corticosteroids then lamivudine and plasma exchanges to treat hepatitis B virus-related polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun 15. 51(3):482-7. [View Abstract]
  67. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Leon A, Fauvelle F, Vivitski L, Trepo C. Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa related to hepatitis B virus with short term steroid therapy associated with antiviral agents and plasma exchanges. A prospective trial in 33 patients. J Rheumatol. 1993 Feb. 20(2):289-98. [View Abstract]
  68. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Sauvaget F, Deblois P, Rossi F, Levallois D. Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa related to hepatitis B virus with interferon-alpha and plasma exchanges. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 May. 53(5):334-7. [View Abstract]
  69. Erhardt A, Sagir A, Guillevin L, Neuen-Jacob E, Häussinger D. Successful treatment of hepatitis B virus associated polyarteritis nodosa with a combination of prednisolone, alpha-interferon and lamivudine. J Hepatol. 2000 Oct. 33(4):677-83. [View Abstract]
  70. Wicki J, Olivieri J, Pizzolato G, Sarasin F, Guillevin L, Dayer JM. Successful treatment of polyarteritis nodosa related to hepatitis B virus with a combination of lamivudine and interferon alpha. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Feb. 38(2):183-5. [View Abstract]
  71. Molloy PJ, Friedlander L, Van Thiel DH. Combined interferon, famciclovir and GM-CSF treatment of HBV infection in an individual with periarteritis nodosa. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Jul-Aug. 46(28):2529-31. [View Abstract]
  72. de Menthon M, Mahr A. Treating polyarteritis nodosa: current state of the art. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jan-Feb. 29(1 Suppl 64):S110-6. [View Abstract]
  73. Fernanda F, Serena C, Giustina R, Antonella B, Alessandra D, Alessio M. Mycophenolate mofetil treatment in two children with severe polyarteritis nodosa refractory to immunosuppressant drugs. Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jul. 32(7):2215-9. [View Abstract]
  74. Berlit P. Diagnosis and treatment of cerebral vasculitis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2010 Jan. 3(1):29-42. [View Abstract]
  75. Kawakami T, Soma Y. Use of mizoribine in two patients with recalcitrant cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jun. 64(6):1213-4. [View Abstract]
  76. Kluger N, Guillot B, Bessis D. Ulcerative cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa treated with mycophenolate mofetil and pentoxifylline. J Dermatolog Treat. 2011 Jun. 22(3):175-7. [View Abstract]

Nonspecific, firm, tender subcutaneous nodules without livedo reticularis and/or systemic involvement may be the first sign of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Tender, hyperpigmented, firm subcutaneous nodules with a background of livedo reticularis common in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Tender erythematous nodules with central "punched out" ulcerations common in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Livedo reticularis in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is characterized by fibrinoid necrosis of the arterial wall with a leukocytic infiltrate. In this slide, a large, pale occlusion of a muscular artery can be seen. Within this collagenous tissue is a leukocytic infiltrate, which is the hallmark of PAN. Courtesy of Urbana Atlas of Pathology.

Nonspecific, firm, tender subcutaneous nodules without livedo reticularis and/or systemic involvement may be the first sign of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Tender, hyperpigmented, firm subcutaneous nodules with a background of livedo reticularis common in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Tender erythematous nodules with central "punched out" ulcerations common in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is characterized by fibrinoid necrosis of the arterial wall with a leukocytic infiltrate. In this slide, a large, pale occlusion of a muscular artery can be seen. Within this collagenous tissue is a leukocytic infiltrate, which is the hallmark of PAN. Courtesy of Urbana Atlas of Pathology.

Livedo reticularis in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN).