Emergent Management of Thermal Burns

Back

Practice Essentials

Burn care should begin at the site of injury and continue through prehospital care and transportation to the closest burn center, or to the closest emergency department (ED) with advanced life support capability, followed by transfer to a burn center when appropriate.

The image below depicts partial- and full-thickness burns.



View Image

Partial- and full-thickness burns from a structure fire. Note facial involvement.

See Thermal Injuries: A Matter of Degree, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify and treat various types and degrees of burn injuries.

Prehospital care

Remove the person from the source of the burn without endangering rescue personnel. After extrication, initial care of the burn victim should follow the basic principles of trauma resuscitation (ie, airway, breathing, and circulation [ABCs]), as follows:

Airway and breathing support

Treatment of burn shock

Fluid resuscitation

Cooling of burned tissue

Transfer to burn center

Initial emergency department treatment

When the patient arrives in the ED, treatment is as follows:

Airway and respiratory care

Fluid resuscitation

Calculation of fluid needs

All patients with a major burn injury must receive fluid resuscitation that is influenced by the percentage of the TBSA covered by the burn,[1] as well as by the presence of inhalation injury. Adequate resuscitation is evidenced by a normal sensorium, stable vital signs, and a normal urinary output, as follows:

The Parkland formula for calculating fluid needs for burn victims in the first 24 hours is as follows:

Fluid requirement (mL) = (4 mL of crystalloid) × (% TBSA burned) × body weight (kg)

An alternative formula for calculating fluid needs in children is the Galveston formula, by which the amount of lactated Ringer solution administered over the first 24 hours is determined as follows:

Fluid requirement = 5000 mL/m2 × % TBSA burned + 2000 mL/m2

Criteria for transfer to a burn center

The American Burn Association has established the following criteria for referring patients to a burn center[2] :

Children with severe burns should be sent to a facility that has personnel and equipment to care for children with burns; children may be transferred between burn centers if the one they were originally brought to is not qualified or does not have the equipment required for the care of children. Patients with burns resulting from abuse may require long-term rehabilitative support.

Prehospital Treatment

Optimal management of burn victims is provided by an echelon system of burn care that is developed on a regional basis. Organization of burn care should begin at the site of injury and continue through prehospital care and transportation to the closest burn center, or to the closest emergency department (ED) with advanced life support capability, followed by transfer to a burn center when appropriate.

The immediate goal of prehospital treatment is to remove the person from the source of the burn. This must be accomplished without endangering rescue personnel. After extrication, initial care of the burn victim should follow the basic principles of trauma resuscitation (ie, airway, breathing, and circulation [ABCs]).

Burn victims rarely die immediately as a result of thermal injury; immediate death is typically the result of coexisting trauma or airway compromise. Accordingly, a rapid primary survey is performed to assess the ABCs. Any problems found should be corrected immediately. Any constricting clothing and jewelry should be removed to prevent these items from exerting a tourniquetlike effect after the development of burn edema.

When ventilatory and circulatory competence have been restored, a secondary survey is done. Concurrently with airway and circulatory management, emergency personnel must make an effort to stop the burning process.

Airway and breathing support

Fires usually emit smoke, which victims may inhale, especially in closed spaces. Smoke inhalation can cause both pulmonary parenchymal damage and carbon monoxide and other toxic poisonings, which may be life-threatening.[3, 4, 5]

Accordingly, during airway assessment, the prehospital care provider should look for signs of inhalation injury (eg, carbonaceous sputum, singed facial or nasal hairs, facial burns, oropharyngeal edema, vocal changes, or altered mental status). Inhalation injury should be assumed in anyone whose history suggests being confined in a fire environment.

If 1 or more of the signs of inhalation injury are present, humidified oxygen should be administered via a nonrebreathing reservoir mask or endotracheal tube at a rate of 10-12 L/min (see Smoke Inhalation; Carbon Monoxide Toxicity; and Prehospital Recognition and Management of Cyanide Poisoning in Smoke Inhalation Victims (Slides With Transcript)). A patient who is not breathing should be intubated and ventilated with 100% oxygen.

Treatment of burn shock

Treatment of burn shock in the prehospital setting should consist of elevating the patient’s legs 12 in. off the ground and administering humidified oxygen. If rescue personnel have advanced life support capability and transport time may be prolonged, these treatments are complemented by intravenous (IV) fluid administration.

Fluid resuscitation need not be initiated if patient will be transported to the hospital in less than 30 minutes. When the transport time will be longer than 30 minutes, the indications for fluid resuscitation include thermal injuries involving greater than 20% of total body surface area (TBSA) and evidence of burn shock.

Fluid resuscitation

Fluid administration should begin immediately with warmed fluid if possible. Catheters may be placed through burned skin if unburned skin is unavailable. If IV access is not possible, interosseous access methods may be considered. This is important because any burn extending over more than 15% of TBSA may produce shock as a result of hypovolemia.[6]

Fluid resuscitation is not recommended for children at the scene of the accident, because of the difficulties encountered in cannulating small veins. When fluid resuscitation is indicated in an adult, lactated Ringer solution or normal saline without glucose is administered through a large-bore percutaneous catheter, preferably inserted through unburned skin. The arm is the preferred site for cannulation. IV flow rates are determined according to the patient’s clinical status.

Cooling of burned tissue

Remove charred clothing. Immerse the burn wound in cold (1-5°C) water for about 30 minutes if transport cannot be undertaken immediately. This must be initiated as soon as possible: cooling has no therapeutic benefit if delayed more than 30 minutes after the burn injury. Do not use ice water, which may worsen the damage to the skin as well as promote hypothermia.[7] Do not apply ice directly to the burn wound: this may result in increased tissue injury through frostbite.

The beneficial effects of immediate cold water treatment of burned skin appear to be related to the following factors:

Local cooling of burns involving less than 9% of TBSA can be continued longer than 30 minutes to relieve pain; however, prolonged cooling of a larger burn can cause severe hypothermia, which may result in cardiac arrest. Prolonged irrigation with cool fluids or leaving the victim in wet sheets will not improve the burn and greatly increases the risk of hypothermia, as well as macerating the healthy tissues surrounding the burn.

Burn victims often complain of feeling chilled as a result of the loss of water and heat through the burned skin. Heat loss can be minimized by first placing a clean sheet under the patient and then covering the patient with another clean sheet, followed by clean blankets. The inside of the transport vehicle should be heated enough to make the patient comfortable. The goal is to “cool the burn wound but warm the patient.”[6]

Minor burns can be cooled with running tap water and dressed after more life-threatening issues have been addressed. It is important not to forget to provide the patient with adequate analgesia.

Transfer to burn center

If the vehicle with advanced life support capability can transport the burn patient to a specialized burn treatment facility within 30 minutes, the patient should be transferred directly to this facility, bypassing other hospitals. If the transport time to the specialized burn treatment facility is longer than 30 minutes, the patient should be transported instead to the nearest ED with advanced life support capability.

Initial Emergency Department Treatment

When the patient arrives in the emergency department (ED), perform a rapid initial assessment of respiratory and cardiovascular status, establish the extent and depth of burn injury (see the images below), and determine the need for special procedures. ED treatment focuses on airway and respiratory care and fluid resuscitation.[6, 8, 9, 10]



View Image

Second-degree burns are often red, wet, and very painful. An enormous variability exists in their depth, their ability to heal, and their tendency to ....



View Image

Third-degree burns are usually leathery, dry, insensate, and waxy. These wounds do not heal.

Most burns seen in the ED are minor. The key point in managing these wounds is to be sure that the patient receives adequate follow-up care. Cool the burn area with towels moistened with cool sterile saline. Avoid immersion in ice baths.

Burns of areas such as the face are best treated by means of an open technique. Wash the burn area, debride any open blisters, and cover the wounds with topical antibiotics. Fingers and toes should be wrapped individually, with fluffed gauze separating the digits in order to prevent maceration and adherence.

Cover all partial-thickness wounds with antibiotic ointment. Silver sulfadiazine is commonly used but may not be available to the emergency physician. Steroids have no role in treating burn wounds. Cleanse other areas with minor burns with the use of a mild soap and gentle scrubbing.

A debate exists as to whether intact blisters should be debrided (see the image below); the intact skin serves as a hermetic barrier, although the blister fluid can serve as an excellent medium for bacterial growth. Another argument for debridement is that removal of the blister roof allows topical agents to reach burn tissue. Blisters that are intact but are located in areas that have a high likelihood of rupture may be sharply debrided. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends debridement of all bullae and excision of all adherent necrotic tissue.[11]



View Image

Management of burn blisters is controversial. Many can be left intact to facilitate comfort while underlying wound heals. Sometimes, blisters obscure ....

Needle aspiration of the blisters should not be performed, because of the high risk of inoculating the blister with bacteria and thereby inciting infection. Open blisters should be debrided.

Wounds should then be treated with a topical antibiotic and dressed. Discharge the patient with explicit instructions on how to clean and dress the wound, and arrange follow-up care for evaluation of the wound.

Remember to check tetanus status of all patients and to administer tetanus immunization (Td) as appropriate. In addition, remember to place a nasogastric (NG) or orogastric (OG) tube in comatose patients, who tend to have gastric dilatation.

Intravenous (IV) antibiotics are not recommended in the initial treatment of most burn patients, because they may increase the chance of colonization with more virulent and resistant organisms.[7] These agents should be reserved for patients with secondary infections (notable as those with fever, malaise, or lymphangitis). Patients with secondary infections (see the images below) should also be admitted to the hospital because they may develop sepsis.



View Image

Clinically focused definition set describing burn wound infections.



View Image

Burn wound cellulitis presents with increasing erythema, swelling, and pain in uninjured skin around periphery of wound.



View Image

Invasive burn wound infection implies that bacteria or fungi proliferating in burn eschar are invading underlying viable tissues. These wounds display....

Airway and Respiratory Care

Inhalation injury has a significant impact on the survival of burn patients. It has 3 components: upper airway swelling, acute respiratory failure, and carbon monoxide intoxication. The natural history of upper airway burn injury is the development of edema that narrows the airway 12-24 hours after injury. Consequently, early intubation rather than observation is recommended in patients with signs of upper airway injury (eg, singed nasal hairs, facial burns, oral burns, sooty sputum, stridor, inspiratory grunting, wheezing, and tachypnea).

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is a simple, safe, and accurate method of diagnosing acute inhalation injury; however, it often is not readily available to the emergency physician. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy reveals the anatomic level and severity of large airway injury; identification of supraglottic and infraglottic involvement is helpful in predicting ultimate pulmonary complications.

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy also may aid in intubating patients with inhalation injury. Because it has been associated with the development of severe hypoxemia, especially in elderly burn patients, supplementary oxygen should be administered through the bronchoscope. The ventilatory system for fiberoptic bronchoscopy can deliver a warmed, humidified, and measured fraction of inspired oxygen either for spontaneous or mechanically assisted ventilation (see below).

Once the airway is secured and the patient is oxygenated, further treatment includes maintenance of pulmonary toilet, relief of mechanical restriction of chest wall motion, and prevention of respiratory failure. When collagen is burned, it loses its elasticity, shortens its fibers, and becomes rigid. This can occur very quickly in fourth-degree and severe third-degree burns. When this process is combined with accumulation of burn edema in interstitial spaces, respiratory insufficiency or ischemia of an extremity may result.

The compressive effect of a full-thickness burn of the neck may contribute to airway compromise. Without tracheostomy, tight neck eschar accentuates pharyngeal edema and draws the neck into flexion, compressing the pharyngeal airway. A vertical incision through the eschar extending from the sternal notch to the chin helps maintain a patent airway.

If respiratory insufficiency is caused by a constricting eschar of the anterior thorax that limits respiratory excursion, escharotomy is imperative (see the images below). Lateral incisions are made in the anterior axillary lines that extend 2 cm below the clavicle to the ninth or 10th rib. The tops and bottoms of the incisions are then joined to form a square across the anterior chest.



View Image

Escharotomy to release chest wall and allow ventilation of patient.

Mechanical ventilation

If respiratory failure ensues, mechanical ventilation is necessary. Airway resistance is often increased after inhalation injury resulting from edema, debris within the airway, or bronchospasm. The goal of mechanical ventilation should be to accept a slightly acidic environment (pH > 7.32) so as to minimize the mean airway pressure required for ventilation. To keep airway pressures to a minimum, ventilator settings may have to be adjusted to slightly higher respiratory rates (16-20 breaths/min) and smaller tidal volumes (7-8 mL/kg).

Experimental studies of baboons with moderate smoke inhalation demonstrated that the barotrauma index (rate times pressure product) was significantly higher during regular ventilation than during high-frequency flow-interruption ventilation. Significantly greater histologic damage of pulmonary parenchyma also occurred in the group treated with conventional ventilation.

High-frequency flow-interruption ventilation appears useful with regard to its ability to recruit damaged, collapsed alveoli and keep them open in expiratory ventilation. Maintaining alveolar recruitment at low mean alveolar pressures helps minimize barotrauma and allows improved distribution of ventilation. Two retrospective studies demonstrated that the incidence of pneumonia and mortality in patients with inhalation injury was lower with high-frequency percussive ventilation than with conventional volume-limited ventilation.

Oscillating ventilator, which superimposes high-frequency ventilation on conventional tidal volume breaths, may be an even better method of ventilation after smoke injury. This method reduces barotrauma and aids in the removal of airway casts by causing vibratory air movement. Airway cast and plug formation can be decreased by nebulized heparin treatments (5000 U in 10 mL of normal saline every 4 hours), which inhibit fibrin clot formation in the airway.

Management of elevated carboxyhemoglobin

Carbon monoxide (CO) is present in smoke and has a 280 times greater affinity for hemoglobin than oxygen does. Obtain a CO level in all patients with suspected inhalation injury. Because the elimination half-life of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) depends on oxygen tension, patients should receive 100% oxygen until their COHb level is lower than 10%.

In room air, the half-life of CO-bound hemoglobin is 4 hours. Under 100% oxygen, the half-life of CO-bound hemoglobin decreases to 45 minutes. Administration of 100% oxygen increases the gradient for oxygen binding to hemoglobin, and unbound CO is exhaled through the lungs.

Patients who have elevated COHb levels associated with a pH of less than 7.4 should be treated with hyperbaric oxygenation. Because serum COHb levels do not reflect tissue levels, evaluate relevant clinical symptoms when considering hyperbaric oxygen therapy.[12, 13] These symptoms include a history of unconsciousness, the presence of neuropsychiatric abnormalities, and the presence of cardiac instability or cardiac ischemia.

Management of cyanide poisoning

Specific therapy for cyanide poisoning in patients with inhalation injury is another consideration. Cyanide causes tissue hypoxia by uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation by binding to mitochondrial cytochrome a-a3. Consider empiric treatment for cyanide toxicity for patients with unexplained severe metabolic acidosis associated with elevated central venous oxygen content, normal arterial oxygen content, and a low COHb level.

Fluid Resuscitation

Establish intravenous (IV) access, and begin fluid resuscitation. Place 1 or 2 large-bore peripheral lines, and administer crystalloids. With the loss of the vapor barrier provided by intact skin, burn victims have large insensible fluid losses. Burn victims will need copious amounts of fluid because only 20-30% of it will remain in the intravascular space.

Patients with burn wounds smaller than 20% of total body surface area (TBSA) can be treated with a combination of oral and IV fluids. For larger burns, the Parkland formula (see below) and its variations have become the standard method for resuscitating the burned patient.

Moderate burn victims should have at least 1 large-bore IV line placed through unburned skin, and severe burn victims should have at least 2 lines in place. If necessary, venous catheters may be placed through burned skin or via venous cutdown using the saphenous vein at the groin or ankle.

When a burn patient requires considerable fluid resuscitation or has evidence of cardiopulmonary disease, a central venous line is indicated. Patients with massive burns or respiratory injury and elderly patients with severe burns or cardiac disease should be monitored with a pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter to avoid fluid overload or inadequate replacement of volume.

Microvascular injury caused by a burn leads to increased vascular permeability with edema formation that results in ongoing plasma volume loss. Maximal edema formation occurs at 8-12 hours after burn injury for small burns and at 24-48 hours for large burns. The purpose of fluid resuscitation is to restore effective plasma volume, avoid microvascular ischemia, and maintain vital organ function. The amount of fluid required varies with the patient’s age, body weight, and percentage of TBSA burned.

Ideally, weigh the patient on a scale. In the absence of this measurement, obtain an estimate of the patient’s weight from the patient, a relative, or the patient’s driver’s license. Carefully map the burned areas over the entire body, including the back, to estimate fluid requirements during the first 48 hours after injury. Typically, burns larger than 20% of TBSA require IV fluid resuscitation because the accompanying gastrointestinal (GI) ileus precludes sufficient oral intake.

Calculation of fluid needs

All patients with a major burn injury must receive fluid resuscitation that is influenced by the percentage of the total body surface area (TBSA) covered by the burn (see the images below),[1] as well as by the presence of inhalation injury.



View Image

Rule of nines for calculating burn area.



View Image

Lund and Browder chart illustrating method for calculating percentage of body surface area affected by burns in children.



View Image

Size of burn is best estimated by using chart that corrects for changes in body proportions with aging.

Several different formulas for fluid resuscitation have been recommended, although all emphasize that adequate resuscitation is evidenced by a normal urinary output (1 mL/lb/h in children younger than 2 years, 0.5 mL/lb/h in older children, and at least 30-40 mL/h in adults), a normal sensorium, and stable vital signs.

A survey of burn units in the United States and Canada found that 78% of the centers used the Parkland formula to estimate resuscitation volume and that lactated Ringer solution was the most popular type of fluid.[14] In marked contrast, a United Kingdom survey revealed that most burn units used human albumin solution and the Muir and Barclay formula to estimate resuscitation volumes.[2]

Since the publication of the findings of the Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers, much discussion has ensued regarding the use of human albumin solution in patients who are critically ill.[15] In 2007, Baker et al reported that resuscitation of patients with thermal injuries in burn units in the United Kingdom and Ireland is fairly consistent with a shift toward crystalloid resuscitation and away from the use of human albumin solution.[16]

The Parkland formula for calculating fluid needs for burn victims in the first 24 hours is as follows:

Thus, a man who weighs 70 kg and has a 30% TBSA burn would require 4 × 30 × 70 = 8400 mL in the first 24 hours.

One half of the calculated fluid requirement is administered in the first 8 hours, and the balance is given over the remaining 16 hours. Thus, fluids would be given at 525 mL/h for the first 8 hours, then at 262.5 mL/h for the remaining 16 hours. It is important to calculate fluid loss from the time of injury, as well as to take into account the fluid administered by prehospital personnel for fluid replacement.

Monitor typical markers of fluid status (eg, urine output) and adjust fluids accordingly. Placement of a Foley catheter (see below) simplifies monitoring of hourly urine output. Urine output should be maintained at 0.5 mL/kg/h.

Strict adherence to a formula for fluid resuscitation does not guarantee successful fluid therapy. For example, the Parkland formula does not predict fluid resuscitation needs in electrical injuries accurately, and the presence of coexisting trauma may increase fluid volumes needed for resuscitation.

If the need is expected to exceed 6 mL/kg times the percentage of TBSA burned per 24 hours, if the patient appears unresponsive to resuscitation, or if signs of impending cardiac failure are present, insertion of a pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter for measurement of pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output is advisable. If the volume is found to be adequate but urine output remains diminished, then dopamine (5 µg/kg/min) may be used to increase renal perfusion.

During resuscitation, the most common error is overhydration, which increases the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing 3-5 days after the burn. In patients with concomitant large TBSA burns and inhalation injury, the Parkland formula may result in unnecessarily large fluid loads. To avoid overhydration, resuscitate patients who have inhalation injuries with amounts substantially lower than specified by the formula, accepting a urinary output in the range of 0.3-0.5 mL/kg/h.

Replacement of lost protein

After a burn injury, a substantial amount of intravascular protein is lost through endothelial leaks in the burned vessels. When endothelial integrity is restored 24 hours after the injury, some clinicians favor the administration of 5% albumin at 0.5 mL/kg/% TBSA to maintain dynamic forces between the extracellular spaces and the intravascular system. In addition, a low-dose dopamine infusion (3-5 µg/kg/min) is beneficial in restoring renal and splanchnic blood flow in patients with major burn injury.

Catheterization and intubation

Place a Foley catheter into the bladder to monitor the effectiveness of IV fluid replacement. Burns of the perineum also are best cared for with an indwelling Foley catheter to decrease urinary soiling of the wound.

In patients with major burn injuries who require IV fluid resuscitation, pass a nasogastric (NG) tube for initial evacuation of fluid and air from the stomach and feeding access. Removal of the gastric contents prevents vomiting and aspiration, sequelae of the ileus that commonly occur soon after burn injuries involving more than 20% of TBSA. Early feeding through the NG tube within 6-8 hours of the burn injury diminishes the hypermetabolic response and maintains intestinal integrity.

Hypertonic saline solutions

Resuscitation with hypertonic saline solutions reduces the fluid volume required. The volume of fluid administered using hypertonic fluid solutions is notably less, yet fluid requirements and percent weight gain have not been shown to be lower with hypertonic saline than with Ringer solution. The anticipated benefits of fewer escharotomies and limited ileus have not been uniformly encountered either.

On the contrary, hypertonic saline resuscitation has been associated with an increased incidence of acute tubular necrosis and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, which can exacerbate the metabolic acidosis of hypovolemic shock. Therefore, hypertonic saline is not currently recommended for resuscitation of burn patients.

Decision not to resuscitate

When a patient with a major burn injury is extremely unlikely to survive (eg, an elderly patient in whom more than 80% of the TBSA is burned), the clinician must be encouraged not to begin fluid resuscitation. This decision must be made only after thoughtful discussion with family members. When resuscitation is not undertaken, the clinician must ensure that patients are not in pain, keep them warm, and allow them to remain in a room with family members.

Special considerations in children

In most respects, burn care in children is similar to that in adults; however, there are some relevant physiologic differences that must be considered in the care of burned children.

Differences in TBSA-weight ratio

The Parkland formula is effective in estimating fluid loss in adults, but it underestimates the evaporative fluid loss and maintenance needs in children. Compared with adults, children have a larger TBSA relative to weight and generally have somewhat greater fluid needs during resuscitation.

An alternative formula that is preferred by many for calculating fluid needs in children is the Galveston formula, which is based on TBSA rather than body weight. Although many pediatric burn centers believe that this formula is more accurate than the Parkland formula, it is more time-consuming to calculate.

By the Galveston formula, the amount of lactated Ringer solution administered over the first 24 hours is determined as follows:

Fluid requirement = 5000 mL/m2 × % TBSA burned + 2000 mL/m2

One half of the total fluid is given in the first 8 hours, with the balance given over the next 16 hours. The maintenance fluid should then be lactated Ringer solution with 5% dextrose; the dextrose is added to the resuscitation fluid to prevent hypoglycemia because children have smaller glycogen stores than adults do.

In children, keep the urine output at 1 mL/kg/h, the pulse in the range of 80-180 beats/min (depending on age), and the base deficit lower than 2.

Differences in thermoregulation

In infants younger than 6 months, temperature is regulated by nonshivering thermogenesis, a metabolic process by which stores of brown fat are catabolized under the influence of norepinephrine, which requires large amounts of oxygen. Consequently, prolonged hypothermia in burned infants may result in excessive lactate production and acidosis.

After 6 months, infants and children are able to shiver. Because they have greater evaporative water loss relative to weight than adults do, infants and children are especially prone to hypothermia; therefore, keep the ambient temperature high to decrease radiant and evaporative heat loss from burned infants and children to the environment.

Differences in renal function

Differences in renal function between infants and adults may have important therapeutic implications for the treatment of burned children. The glomerular filtration rate in infants does not reach adult levels until the age of 9-12 months, because of an imbalance in maturation of tubular and glomerular functions. During this early period, infants have approximately half the osmolar concentrating capacity of adults, and a water load is handled inefficiently.

The rate of water excretion is time dependent and decreases as water loading continues. During the first several weeks of life, infants are likely to retain a larger portion of a water load administered as part of burn resuscitation. The hyposmolarity of lactated Ringer solution, when used in accordance with the Parkland formula, already accounts for the free water needs of infants during the first 24 hours after the burn. Additional water often results in fluid overloading.

Treatment of Special Burn Types

Tar burns

The boiling points of asphalt and roofing tar are 140° C and 232° C, respectively. Tar cools rapidly to between 93°-104° C as soon as it leaves the heat source. In most cases, the tar is cool by the time the patient arrives in the emergency department (ED). If it is not, it should be actively cooled to terminate thermal damage with room temperature saline or water.

Once the tar is firm, it should be picked, peeled, and debrided from the underlying tissue. Some degree of autodebridement will occur. Debridement involves a balance between removing the foreign body (tar) and exposing the injured skin for evaluation and treatment. Judgment should be exercised as to how much debridement is appropriate in the emergency setting. Extensive debridement may necessitate moderate-to-deep sedation.

If the skin has only a light coating of tar and the patient does not complain about the underlying skin or surrounding tissue, leaving the tar in place may be acceptable. Tar that is part of an obvious burn, blister, or tissue loss should be removed. Tar on the conjunctiva should be removed by an ophthalmologist.

Applying ointments, such as polymicrobial antibiotic ointment, petroleum jelly, or mineral oil, can facilitate tar removal. Organic solvents, such as acetone or gasoline, must be not be used to remove the tar. If an ointment is used, it should be left on for 2-4 hours at a time until the tar has dissolved.

Common household agents, such as mayonnaise, butter, sunflower seed oil, and baby oil, have been promoted for removal of tar. Organic, nonsterile agents are easy to acquire and are available in large quantities, but they carry the risk of promoting wound infection or allergic reaction. Bacterial or fungal growth can occur if the tar is not completely removed and the organic agent is not completely rinsed off.

Recently published guidelines for the treatment of asphalt burns recommend immediate cooling, gradual removal of adherent asphalt with topical antibiotics, and avoiding use of topical agents that may cause tissue toxicity. Standard burn management should be performed once the asphalt is removed. In addition to topical antibiotics, other solvents used to remove asphalt include petroleum jelly, sunflower oil, baby oil, liquid paraffin, butter, mayonnaise, and Moist Exposed Burn Ointment. Use of kerosene, gasoline, or ethanol can damage tissue.[17, 18]

Circumferential full-thickness burns involving extremities

Circumferential full-thickness burns involving the extremities or the chest may warrant escharotomy. As edema forms in the injured extremity after the burn, the tough, rigid eschar restricts outward expansion of the tissue, and the interstitial pressure rises to the point where vascular flow is compromised. In short, the eschar behaves like a tourniquet. This typically occurs 12-24 hours after an injury. Incising the eschar allows return of flow and prevents further ischemic injury. Because full-thickness burns are insensate, topical anesthetics are not needed.

Perform escharotomy along the lateral aspect of the extremity with a linear and lengthwise incision. Use of an electrocautery simplifies the procedure and can reduce the amount of bleeding. The incision should go completely through the eschar. The subcutaneous fat will appear to bubble up into the escharotomy wound. Bleeding is minimal and is easily controlled by pressure. Upon completion of the escharotomy, a dressing with antibiotics is placed on the wound, and the extremity is elevated to help maintain homeostasis.

If the chest is involved and the eschar compromises ventilatory motion, perform an escharotomy involving the anterior chest. Incisions are made along the costal margin, along the anterior axillary lines, and across the top of the chest, freeing up the anterior chest wall.

Criteria for Transfer to Burn Center

The American Burn Association has established the following criteria for referring patients to a burn center[2] :

Children with severe burns should be sent to a facility that has personnel and equipment to care for pediatric burn cases. Children may be transferred between burn centers if the one they were originally brought to is not qualified or does not have the equipment required for the care of children. With burns that result from abuse, the patient may require long-term rehabilitative support

Before transfer, the referring physician must ensure adequate respiratory support, as follows:

The referring physician must also ensure appropriate care of the burn wound, as follows:

Physician-to-physician contact before transfer is essential. The accepting physician at the burn center can provide advice on caring for the burn patient and often can assist in arranging transfer. Documentation of the care already provided for the patient and of any relevant findings should accompany the patient to the burn center.

Author

Erik D Schraga, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mills-Peninsula Emergency Medical Associates

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Joe Alcock, MD, MS, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Jamie Angela Jenkins, MD, Attending Physician, Ultrasound Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Joseph Medical Center; Attending Physician, Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Roy Alson, MD, PhD, FACEP, FAAEM Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine; Medical Director, Forsyth County EMS; Deputy Medical Advisor, North Carolina Office of EMS; Associate Medical Director, North Carolina Baptist AirCare

Roy Alson, MD, PhD, FACEP, FAAEM is a member of the following medical societies: Air Medical Physician Association, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, National Association of EMS Physicians, North Carolina Medical Society, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Public Health Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jerome FX Naradzay, MD, FACEP Medical Director, Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maria Parham Hospital; Medical Examiner, Vance County, North Carolina

Jerome FX Naradzay, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Debra Slapper, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, St Anthony's Hospital

Debra Slapper, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References

  1. Perry RJ, Moore CA, Morgan BD, Plummer DL. Determining the approximate area of a burn: an inconsistency investigated and re-evaluated. BMJ. 1996 May 25. 312(7042):1338. [View Abstract]
  2. Wharton SM, Khanna A. Current attitudes to burns resuscitation in the UK. Burns. 2001 Mar. 27(2):183-4. [View Abstract]
  3. World Fire Statistics Centre. Population Comparisons for Fire Deaths (2002-2004). The Geneva Association Web site. Available at http://www.genevaassociation.org/Affiliated_Organizations/WFSC.aspx. Accessed: October 2007.
  4. Jones D, Lee W, Rea S, et al. Firework injuries presenting to a national burn's unit. Ir Med J. 2004 Sep. 97(8):244-5. [View Abstract]
  5. Fire Deaths and Injuries, Facts - NCIPC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/fire.htm. Accessed: March 1, 2008.
  6. Taira BR, Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr, Lee C. Burns in the emergency department: a national perspective. J Emerg Med. 2010 Jul. 39(1):1-5. [View Abstract]
  7. World Health Organization 2007. Management of Burns. World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/surgery/publications/Burns_management.pdf. Accessed: March 2, 2008.
  8. D'Souza AL, Nelson NG, McKenzie LB. Pediatric burn injuries treated in US emergency departments between 1990 and 2006. Pediatrics. 2009 Nov. 124(5):1424-30. [View Abstract]
  9. Sheridan R. Outpatient burn care in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Jul. 21(7):449-56; quiz 457-9. [View Abstract]
  10. Reed JL, Pomerantz WJ. Emergency management of pediatric burns. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Feb. 21(2):118-29. [View Abstract]
  11. Choi M, Armstrong MB, Panthaki ZJ. Pediatric hand burns: thermal, electrical, chemical. J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jul. 20(4):1045-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Chong SJ, Kan EM, Song C, Soh CR, Lu J. Characterization of early thermal burns and the effects of hyperbaric oxygen treatment: a pilot study. Diving Hyperb Med. 2013 Sep. 43(3):157-61. [View Abstract]
  13. Celbek G, Boz BV, Caglar SO, Aydin LY, Kandis H, Saritas A. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan. 31(1):261.e5-7. [View Abstract]
  14. Fakhry SM, Alexander J, Smith D, Meyer AA, Peterson HD. Regional and institutional variation in burn care. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Jan-Feb. 16(1):86-90; discussion 85. [View Abstract]
  15. Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998 Jul 25. 317(7153):235-40. [View Abstract]
  16. Baker RH, Akhavani MA, Jallali N. Resuscitation of thermal injuries in the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007. 60(6):682-5. [View Abstract]
  17. Goodier R. Treat asphalt burns with immediate cooling, first aid: review. Medscape Medical News from WebMD. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/819827. 2014 Jan 28; Accessed: February 3, 2014.
  18. Bosse GM, Wadia SA, Padmanabhan P. Hot asphalt burns: a review of injuries and management options. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan 18 [Epub ahead of print]. 32 (7):820.e1-3. [View Abstract]
  19. Cheung W, Clayton N, Li F, et al. The effect of endotracheal tube size on voice and swallowing function in patients with thermal burn injury: an evaluation using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures (AusTOMS). Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Apr. 15(2):216-20. [View Abstract]

Partial- and full-thickness burns from a structure fire. Note facial involvement.

Second-degree burns are often red, wet, and very painful. An enormous variability exists in their depth, their ability to heal, and their tendency to result in hypertrophic scar formation.

Third-degree burns are usually leathery, dry, insensate, and waxy. These wounds do not heal.

Management of burn blisters is controversial. Many can be left intact to facilitate comfort while underlying wound heals. Sometimes, blisters obscure full-thickness wounds, as shown here, but, usually, wounds underlying blisters are partial-thickness wounds.

Clinically focused definition set describing burn wound infections.

Burn wound cellulitis presents with increasing erythema, swelling, and pain in uninjured skin around periphery of wound.

Invasive burn wound infection implies that bacteria or fungi proliferating in burn eschar are invading underlying viable tissues. These wounds display change in color, new drainage, and, commonly, foul odor. This infection can be life-threatening.

Escharotomy to release chest wall and allow ventilation of patient.

Rule of nines for calculating burn area.

Lund and Browder chart illustrating method for calculating percentage of body surface area affected by burns in children.

Size of burn is best estimated by using chart that corrects for changes in body proportions with aging.

Partial- and full-thickness burns from a structure fire. Note facial involvement.

Rule of nines for calculating burn area.

Lund and Browder chart illustrating method for calculating percentage of body surface area affected by burns in children.

Child with burns from scalding. Hot soup was spilled when child grabbed handle of pot. Note full-thickness burn to left upper part of chest. Edema of lips and blisters on face and nose indicate second-degree burns of face.

Escharotomy to release chest wall and allow ventilation of patient.

59-year-old physician with deep-seated bulla on middle finger after burning himself taking a hot bun out of the oven.

The American Burn Association has developed criteria for burn center transfer. These criteria have been adopted by most emergency medical services.

Size of burn is best estimated by using chart that corrects for changes in body proportions with aging.

Second-degree burns are often red, wet, and very painful. An enormous variability exists in their depth, their ability to heal, and their tendency to result in hypertrophic scar formation.

Third-degree burns are usually leathery, dry, insensate, and waxy. These wounds do not heal.

Management of burn blisters is controversial. Many can be left intact to facilitate comfort while underlying wound heals. Sometimes, blisters obscure full-thickness wounds, as shown here, but, usually, wounds underlying blisters are partial-thickness wounds.

Clinically focused definition set describing burn wound infections.

Burn wound cellulitis presents with increasing erythema, swelling, and pain in uninjured skin around periphery of wound.

Invasive burn wound infection implies that bacteria or fungi proliferating in burn eschar are invading underlying viable tissues. These wounds display change in color, new drainage, and, commonly, foul odor. This infection can be life-threatening.

Large (and increasing) numbers of medications and membranes have been selected for use in burn wound management.

If hand positioning and therapy are ignored while overlying burns heal, long-term suboptimal function may result.

Depth of partial-thickness burns is routinely underestimated in outpatient setting.

Two-year-old child is brought to office for evaluation of scald burn to hand.

Splinting of serious hand burn.