Torsion of the Appendices and Epididymis

Back

Background

Torsion of testicular appendages can result in the clinical presentation of acute scrotum. Two such appendages are the appendix testis, a remnant of the paramesonephric (müllerian) duct, and the appendix epididymis, a remnant of the mesonephric (wolffian) duct.

The appendix testis is present in 92% of all testes and is usually located at the superior testicular pole in the groove between the testicle and the epididymis. The appendix epididymis is present in 23% of testes and usually projects from the head of the epididymis, but its location may vary. Most acute presentations of scrotal pain and swelling can be attributed to epididymitis, testicular torsion, or torsion of a testicular appendage. The presentations of these conditions can typically be distinguished by history and examination. However, in many cases, torsion of a testicular appendage, although a benign condition, may present identically to testicular torsion, a true urologic emergency.

Testicular torsion must be diagnosed quickly and accurately, because delay of the diagnosis and subsequent delay of surgery, if needed, can lead to loss of testicular viability and orchidectomy.[1]

Pathophysiology

The vestigial tissues forming the appendices are commonly pedunculated and are structurally predisposed to torsion. Torsion of an appendage leads to ischemia and infarction. Necrosis of appendices causes pain and local inflammation of surrounding the tunica vaginalis and epididymis (acute hemiscrotum). Torsion of the testicular appendage may also be accompanied by presence of a thickened scrotal wall, a reactive hydrocele, and enlargement of the head of the epididymis.

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Torsion of testicular appendices is one of the most common causes of acute scrotum; it is the leading cause of acute scrotum in children.

In several retrospective reviews of pediatric patients who presented to the emergency department with acute scrotal pain, the incidence of torsed testicular appendage ranged from 46-71% and represented the most common cause of scrotal pain.

In one study of 155 scrotal explorations that were performed for acute scrotal pain, the pathology was testicular torsion in 46.5% (N = 72); torsion of a testicular appendage in 30.3% (N = 47); epididymitis in 16.1% (N = 25); no obvious pathology in 3.3% (N = 5); and other pathology in 4%. The mean age was 9.1 years (range 0-15 years), and there was a significant difference in age of presentation between those with testicular torsion and those with torsion of a testicular appendage (9 vs 10 years, P = 0.0074).[2] In another, retrospective study of 76 patients younger than 15 years with acute scrotal pain, 59 (78%) had acute spermatic cord torsion, 16 (21%) had torsion of the testicular appendage, and 1 (1%) had orchitis. In patients with acute spermatic cord torsion, the median age was 13 years (range: 0.18-14.97).[3]

Mortality/Morbidity

Torsion of the testicular appendices is virtually a benign condition, but again, must be distinguished from testicular torsion, which can have permanent consequences on testicular viability.

Age

Age ranges vary from infancy to adulthood with more than 80% of cases occurring in children aged 7-14 years. Mean age is 10.6 years. This condition rarely presents in adulthood (probably due to local fibrosis). Torsion of testicular appendices is the leading cause of acute scrotum in children.[2, 3, 5, 6]

Prognosis

The prognosis is excellent. Long-term sequelae to this condition do not exist. Virtually all patients have uneventful recoveries.

Patient Education

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicineHealth's Men's Health Center. Also, see eMedicineHealth's patient education article Testicular Pain.

History

The patient's history is important in distinguishing torsion of the testicular appendages from testicular torsion and other causes of acute scrotum.

The most common cause of acute scrotum in prepubertal boys is torsion of the testicular or epididymal appendages.[7]

Pain may be present. Onset is usually acute, but pain may develop over time. Typically, it has a more gradual onset than testicular torsion. Intensity ranges from mild to severe. Patients may endure pain for several days before seeking medical attention. The pain is located in the superior pole of the testicle. This is a key distinguishing factor from testicular torsion. A focal point of pain on the testicle is uncommon in complete testicular torsion.

Systemic symptoms are absent. Nausea and vomiting (frequently seen in testicular torsion) are usually not associated with this condition.

Urinary symptoms are absent. Dysuria and pyuria are not associated with torsion of the testicular appendages. Their presence is more indicative of epididymitis.

Physical

Physical examination may reveal the following findings[5] :

Laboratory Studies

Lab studies include urinalysis and CBC with differential.

Imaging Studies

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography can be useful in distinguishing torsion of a testicle and torsion of an appendix testis. Testicular appendage torsion appears as a lesion of low echogenicity with a central hypoechogenic area. The presence of a large appendix adjacent to the epididymis (in the absence of clinically detectable inflammation) may signify testicular involvement. If the edematous appendix and the head of the epididymis are close enough, this condition will have the "Mickey Mouse" appearance on transverse view.

In a retrospective study of 241 boys with acute scrotal pain, the best predictors for epididymitis were dysuria, a painful epididymis on palpation, and altered epididymal echogenicity and increased peritesticular perfusion on ultrasound studies; for appendix testis (AT), the best predictor was a positive blue dot sign.[9]

Color Doppler ultrasonography

Color Doppler sonography (CDS) is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the acute scrotum.[10, 11, 7]  In torsion of the testicular appendage, CDS shows normal blood flow to the testis, with an occasional increase on the affected side that possibly is due to inflammation. In prepubertal patients, this method of imaging is somewhat controversial because the prepubertal testis has low-velocity blood flow, and CDS is less accurate in these instances.

Standard US of the scrotum should include both grayscale and Doppler studies. Linear high-resolution transducers should be used, and te studies should include both the scrotum and inguinal areas. In patients with torsion, a normal homogeneous echo pattern is likely to indicate a viable testis, whereas a hypoechoic or inhomogeneous testis is likely to be nonviable.[12]

Some studies suggest that CDS has 90% sensitivity and 98% specificity in diagnosing acute testicular torsion. However, variability exists in the sensitivity of color Doppler ultrasonography. As a result, a negative ultrasonographic result does not necessarily exclude testicular torsion.

A study by Pepe et al demonstrated that CDS specificity may not be as high as previously reported for testicular torsion.[13] In a subset analysis of 42 adolescents with diagnostic suspicion of testicular torsion by CDS, only 22 had surgical confirmation of this diagnosis, while 16 were found to be normal and 4 had torsion of the testicular appendage. In fact, clinical examination alone had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 50%, respectively, while CDS had sensitivity and specificity of 95.7% and 48.7%, respectively. In a patient presenting with an acute scrotum, a negative CDS result may provide supportive evidence that the patient has a benign condition like torsion of an appendage, but it does not exclude the diagnosis of testicular torsion. In high clinical suspicion, surgical exploration may still be warranted.

Radionuclide imaging

Since the acceptance of Doppler US as the primary imaging for evaluation of acute scrotum, radionuclide scrotal imaging (RNSI) is uncommonly used.[12] The positive sign for testicular appendix torsion is the hot-dot sign, which is an area of increased tracer uptake. This sign is pathognomonic for testicular appendix torsion. Radionuclide images do not show a positive result if symptoms have been present for fewer than 5 hours. Positive results are seen in only 45% of patients whose symptoms have lasted 5-24 hours.[14] The test is reported to be 68% sensitive and 79% accurate.[14]

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI techniques are not typically used for the acute scrotum because of the limited availability of equipment and the long examination time involved. However, the use of MRI in scrotal diseases is increasing, and future studies are necessary to help determine the role of MRI in patients who have acute scrotal pain but equivocal CDU findings.[12]

Emergency Department Care

Necrotic tissue of the testicular appendices causes no damage other than damage to itself. Most cases, therefore, are treated conservatively. Pain usually resolves within 1 week but may persist for several weeks. Uncontrolled pain can be relieved by surgical excision of the appendix.

NSAIDs and ice are the mainstays of therapy for inflammation, and reduced activity and scrotal support are indicated.

 

 

Consultations

If the diagnosis is unclear and testicular torsion cannot be ruled out or if pain persists, surgical exploration is warranted.[15]

Guidelines Summary

The following guidelines have been published by the American College of Radiology[12] :

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and prevent complications.

Ibuprofen (Ibuprin, Advil, Motrin)

Clinical Context:  DOC for patients with mild to moderate pain. Inhibits inflammatory reactions and pain by decreasing prostaglandin synthesis.

Ketoprofen (Actron, Orudis, Oruvail)

Clinical Context:  For relief of mild to moderate pain and inflammation.

Small dosages initially are indicated in small and elderly patients and in those with renal or liver disease.

Doses over 75 mg do not increase therapeutic effects. Administer high doses with caution and closely observe patient for response.

Naproxen (Aleve, Anaprox, Naprelan, Naprosyn)

Clinical Context:  For relief of mild to moderate pain; inhibits inflammatory reactions and pain by decreasing activity of cyclooxygenase, which results in a decrease of prostaglandin synthesis.

Class Summary

These agents have anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activities. Their mechanism of action is not known, but they may inhibit cyclooxygenase activity and prostaglandin synthesis. Other mechanisms may exist as well, such as inhibition of leukotriene synthesis, lysosomal enzyme release, lipoxygenase activity, neutrophil aggregation, and various cell-membrane functions.

Author

Jason S Chang, MD, Clinical Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Richard H Sinert, DO, Professor of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, Research Director, State University of New York College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Vice-Chair in Charge of Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Pfizer Pharmaceutical<br/>Received research grant from: National Institutes Health.

Chief Editor

Erik D Schraga, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mills-Peninsula Emergency Medical Associates

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Theodore J Gaeta, DO, MPH, FACEP, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College; Vice Chairman and Program Director of Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital; Academic Chair, Adjunct Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, St George's University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors, Sean O Henderson, MD, and Gregory Alfred, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Fabiani A, Calabrese M, Filosa A, Fioretti F, Maurelli V, Scandola M, et al. Explorative surgery for acute scrotal pain: The importance of patient age, side affected, time to surgery and surgeon. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Oct 5. 88 (3):189-194. [View Abstract]
  2. Nason GJ, Tareen F, McLoughlin D, McDowell D, Cianci F, Mortell A. Scrotal exploration for acute scrotal pain: a 10-year experience in two tertiary referral paediatric units. Scand J Urol. 2013 Oct. 47(5):418-22. [View Abstract]
  3. Even L, Abbo O, Le Mandat A, Lemasson F, Carfagna L, Soler P, et al. [Testicular torsion in children: Factors influencing delayed treatment and orchiectomy rate]. Arch Pediatr. 2013 Apr. 20(4):364-8. [View Abstract]
  4. Rakha E, Puls F, Saidul I, Furness P. Torsion of the testicular appendix: importance of associated acute inflammation. J Clin Pathol. 2006 Aug. 59(8):831-4. [View Abstract]
  5. Boettcher M, Bergholz R, Krebs TF, Wenke K, Aronson DC. Clinical predictors of testicular torsion in children. Urology. 2012 Mar. 79(3):670-4. [View Abstract]
  6. Krishnan A, Rich MA, Swana HS. Torsion of the Appendix Testis in a Neonate. Case Rep Urol. 2016. 2016:9183196. [View Abstract]
  7. Lev M, Ramon J, Mor Y, Jacobson JM, Soudack M. Sonographic appearances of torsion of the appendix testis and appendix epididymis in children. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015 Oct. 43 (8):485-9. [View Abstract]
  8. Karmazyn B, Steinberg R, Kornreich L. Clinical and sonographic criteria of acute scrotum in children: a retrospective study of 172 boys. Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Mar. 35(3):302-10. [View Abstract]
  9. Boettcher M, Bergholz R, Krebs TF, Wenke K, Treszl A, Aronson DC, et al. Differentiation of epididymitis and appendix testis torsion by clinical and ultrasound signs in children. Urology. 2013 Oct. 82(4):899-904. [View Abstract]
  10. Aydogdu O, Burgu B, Gocun PU, Ozden E, Yaman O, Soygur T, et al. Near infrared spectroscopy to diagnose experimental testicular torsion: comparison with Doppler ultrasound and immunohistochemical correlation of tissue oxygenation and viability. J Urol. 2012 Feb. 187(2):744-50. [View Abstract]
  11. Galina P, Dermentzoglou V, Baltogiannis N, Zarifi M. Sonographic appearances of the epididymis in boys with acute testicular torsion but preserved testicular blood flow on color Doppler. Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Oct. 45 (11):1661-71. [View Abstract]
  12. Remer EM, Casalino DD, Arellano RS, Bishoff JT, Coursey CA, Dighe M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® acute onset of scrotal pain--without trauma, without antecedent mass. Ultrasound Q. 2012 Mar. 28 (1):47-51. [View Abstract]
  13. Pepe P, Panella P, Pennisi M, Aragona F. Does color Doppler sonography improve the clinical assessment of patients with acute scrotum?. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Oct. 60(1):120-4. [View Abstract]
  14. Melloul M, Paz A, Lask D, et al. The pattern of radionuclide scrotal scan in torsion of testicular appendages. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996 Aug. 23(8):967-70. [View Abstract]
  15. Saxena AK, Castellani C, Ruttenstock EM, Höllwarth ME. Testicular Torsion: A 15-Year Single Center Clinical and Histological Analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Mar 3. [View Abstract]
  16. Barloon TJ, Weissman AM, Kahn D. Diagnostic imaging of patients with acute scrotal pain. Am Fam Physician. 1996 Apr. 53(5):1734-50. [View Abstract]
  17. Fisher R, Walker J. The acute paediatric scrotum. Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Mar 16-Apr 5. 51(6):290-2. [View Abstract]
  18. Holland JM, Graham JB, Ignatoff JM. Conservative management of twisted testicular appendages. J Urol. 1981 Feb. 125(2):213-4. [View Abstract]
  19. Hormann M, Balassy C, Philipp MO, Pumberger W. Imaging of the scrotum in children. Eur Radiol. 2004 Jun. 14(6):974-83. [View Abstract]
  20. Johnson KA, Dewbury KC. Ultrasound imaging of the appendix testis and appendix epididymis. Clin Radiol. 1996 May. 51(5):335-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Kadish HA, Bolte RG. A retrospective review of pediatric patients with epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of testicular appendages. Pediatrics. 1998 Jul. 102(1 Pt 1):73-6. [View Abstract]
  22. Kogan SJ, Hadziselmovic F, Howards SS. Pediatric andrology: congenital and acquired scrotal abnormalities. Adult and Pediatric Urology. 4th ed. 2002. Vol 3: 2570-2581.
  23. Lewis AG, Bukowski TP, Jarvis PD, et al. Evaluation of acute scrotum in the emergency department. J Pediatr Surg. 1995 Feb. 30(2):277-81; discussion 281-2. [View Abstract]
  24. McAndrew HF, Pemberton R, Kikiros CS. The incidence and investigation of acute scrotal problems in children. Peditric Surg Int. 2002 Sept. 18:435-437. [View Abstract]
  25. Rabinowitz R, Hulbert WC Jr. Acute scrotal swelling. Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb. 22(1):101-5. [View Abstract]
  26. Ravichandran S, Blades RA, Watson ME. Torsion of the epididymis: a rare cause of acute scrotum. Int J Urol. 2003 Oct. 10(10):556-7. [View Abstract]
  27. Sahni D, Jit I, Joshi K, Sanjeev. Incidence and structure of the appendices of the testis and epididymis. J Anat. 1996 Oct. 189 ( Pt 2):341-8. [View Abstract]
  28. Siegel MJ. The acute scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997 Jul. 35(4):959-76. [View Abstract]
  29. Strauss S, Faingold R, Manor H. Torsion of the testicular appendages: sonographic appearance. J Ultrasound Med. 1997 Mar. 16(3):189-92; quiz 193-4. [View Abstract]
  30. Watkin NA, Reiger NA, Moisey CU. Is the conservative management of the acute scrotum justified on clinical grounds?. Br J Urol. 1996 Oct. 78(4):623-7. [View Abstract]
  31. Williamson RC. Torsion of the testis and allied conditions. Br J Surg. 1976 Jun. 63(6):465-76. [View Abstract]
  32. Yazbeck S, Patriquin HB. Accuracy of Doppler sonography in the evaluation of acute conditions of the scrotum in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Sep. 29(9):1270-2. [View Abstract]