Breast Abscesses and Masses

Back

Background

Breast masses are broadly classified as benign or malignant. Common causes of benign breast lesions include fibrocystic disease, fibroadenoma (see the image below), intraductal papilloma, and abscess. Malignant breast disease encompasses many histologic types that include, but are not limited to, in situ ductal or lobular carcinoma, infiltrating ductal or lobular carcinoma, and inflammatory carcinoma. The main concern of many women presenting with a breast mass is the likelihood of cancer. Reassuringly, most breast masses are benign.



View Image

Ultrasonogram demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with smooth, partially lobulated margins typical of a fibroadenoma.

See Breast Lumps in Young Women: Diagnostic Approaches, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify and manage palpable breast lumps in young women.

Breast infections are divided into lactational and nonlactational infections and puerperal versus nonpuerperal, depending on their association with pregnancy. The process may be confined to the skin overlying the breast, or it may result from an underlying lesion (eg, sebaceous cyst), as in hidradenitis suppurativa.[1, 2, 3, 4]

Pathophysiology

The mammary glands arise from a caudal section of the ectodermal tissue known as the “milk lines,” which extend along the anterior surface of the developing fetus from the axilla to the groin. During puberty, pituitary and ovarian hormonal influences stimulate female breast enlargement, primarily owing to accumulation of adipocytes. Each breast contains approximately 15-25 glandular units know as breast lobules, which are demarcated by Cooper ligaments. Each lobule is composed of a tubuloalveolar gland and adipose tissue. Each lobule drains into the lactiferous duct, which subsequently empties onto the surface of the nipple. Multiple lactiferous ducts converge to form one ampulla, which traverses the nipple to open at the apex.[5]

Below the nipple surface, lactiferous ducts form large dilations called lactiferous sinuses, which act as milk reservoirs during lactation.[6] When the lactiferous duct lining undergoes epidermalization, keratin production may cause plugging of the duct, resulting in abscess formation.[7, 8] This may explain the high recurrence rate (an estimated 39%-50%) of breast abscesses in patients treated with standard incision and drainage, as this technique does not address the basic mechanism by which breast abscesses are thought to occur.

Postpartum mastitis is a localized cellulitis caused by bacterial invasion through an irritated or fissured nipple. It typically occurs after the second postpartum week and may be precipitated by milk stasis.[9] There is usually a history of a cracked nipple or skin abrasion or failure to clean nipples after breastfeeding.[10] Sleeping position may also affect the progression of mastitis to breast abscess.[10] Staphylococcus aureus is the most common organism responsible, but Staphylococcus epidermidis and streptococci are occasionally isolated. Drainage of milk from the affected segment should be encouraged and is best achieved by continued breastfeeding or use of a breast pump.[3, 8, 4]

Nonlactating infections may be divided into central (periareolar) and peripheral breast lesions. Periareolar infections consist of active inflammation around nondilated subareolar breast ducts—a condition termed periductal mastitis. Peripheral nonlactating breast abscesses are less common than periareolar abscesses and are often associated with an underlying condition such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, steroid treatment, granulomatous lobular mastitis, trauma, and smoking.[1, 11, 12] Primary skin infections of the breast (cellulitis or abscess) most commonly affect the skin of the lower half of the breast and often recur in women who are overweight, have large breasts, or have poor personal hygiene.[3]

Breast masses can involve any of the tissues that make up the breast, including overlying skin, ducts, lobules, and connective tissues. Fibrocystic disease, the most common breast mass in women, is found in 60%-90% of breasts during routine autopsy. Fibroadenoma, the most common benign tumor, typically affects women aged 30 years or younger and accounts for 91% of all solid breast masses in females younger than 19 years.[5] Infiltrating ductal carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor; however, inflammatory carcinoma is the most aggressive and carries the worst prognosis. Mammary Paget disease, or adenocarcinoma of the nipple epidermis, is relatively rare but may be misdiagnosed as a benign dermatosis if care is not taken.[13, 14]

Epidemiology

Frequency

Statistics provided refer to populations in the United States.

After skin cancer, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, accounting for roughly 1 in 4 cancers diagnosed and affecting 12.4% of women during their lifetime.[15]

Breast infections occur in as many as 10%-33% of lactating women.[16, 17]

Lactational mastitis is seen in approximately 2%-3% of lactating women,[6, 18, 4] and breast abscess may develop in 5%-11% of women with mastitis.[18, 4]

Mortality/Morbidity

Breast mass

Morbidity and mortality depends on etiology (benign vs malignant) and stage of malignant lesions.

Approximately 2.1%-3.6% of women die of breast cancer. In 2009, approximately 40,170 women were expected to die from breast cancer,[15] remaining stable at 40,610 in 2017, just behind lung and colon cancer.

Despite significant differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, overall and disease-free survival rates are similar for men and women with breast cancer.[19, 20]

Associated morbidity may include scarring, disfigurement, lymphedema, and psychologic stress.

Breast abscess

Recurrent or chronic infections, pain, and scarring are causes of morbidity.

Mastitis is usually seen in lactating women, but the presence in a nonlactating woman should spur evaluation for an inflammatory carcinoma, newly onset diabetes, infection withMycobacterium tuberculosis, and other idiopathic causes.[3, 12]

Abscess formation complicates postpartum mastitis in fewer than 10% of cases.

Neonatal mastitis usually occurs in term or near-term infants, is twice as common in females, and progresses to development of a breast abscess in approximately 50% of cases.[21, 22, 5]

Race

While white women have a higher incidence of breast cancer than African American women after age 40 years, African American women have a higher incidence of early breast cancer (before age 40 years) and are more likely to die of breast cancer at every age.[23]

African American women have been variably reported to have an increased incidence of developing a primary breast abscess.[24, 25]

Sex

Approximately 99% of breast cancers are found in women.

Up to 1% of breast cancers occur in men, but numbers have been increasing.[19] Men with changes in breast size should undergo as aggressive of a diagnostic workup as women.[21, 22, 26, 27]

Age

Fibroadenoma, a benign condition, is the most common cause of breast mass in women younger than 35 years.[5]

In 2017, women aged 40 years or older accounted for nearly 96% of new breast cancer diagnoses and 98% of breast cancer deaths.

The median age at breast cancer diagnosis is 62 years.

Breast infections most commonly affect women aged 18-50 years.[3]

Nonpuerperal breast masses encompass a wider range of ages, from the late second to eighth decade of life. Peak incidence is often in the fourth decade of life. Ninety-five percent of these infections occur in women.[8]

Puerperal breast abscesses and mastitis are commonly found in women of childbearing age (mean age of 32 years).[1]

Access to care

Women who reside in rural settings may be more likely to present with a more advanced cancer stage than women in urban settings. This may partly result from the availability of and access to effective screening tools and primary care.[28]

Prognosis

Breast mass: Prognosis varies from excellent in patients with a fibroadenoma to poor in those with inflammatory breast cancer. Influencing factors include tumor size, histology, nodal involvement, distant metastases, and comorbid conditions.

Breast abscess: Unfortunately, the recurrence rate of breast abscess is high (39%-50%) when treated with standard incision and drainage, and studies have shown even higher recurrence rates in women undergoing fine-needle aspiration.[29] Nonpuerperal abscesses recur more frequently, especially when associated with non-staphylococcal species (>50% recurrence rate).[8] Studies of patients with fistulectomy show lower recurrence rates.

Mastitis: Most patients experience resolution within 2-3 weeks. All patients with symptoms that have not resolved within 5 weeks should be evaluated for resistant infection or malignancy.

Patient Education

Educate women who are lactating on nipple hygiene because cracking and abrasions of the skin increase risk of infection.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicineHealth's Women's Health Center and Cancer Center. Also, see eMedicineHealth's patient education articles Breast Infection, Breast Lumps and Pain, Breast Self-Exam, and Breast Cancer.

History

Breast mass

See the list below:

Mastitis

See the list below:

Breast abscess

See the list below:

Physical

Perform a thorough breast examination in any patient presenting with a breast complaint and in any older woman presenting with unexplained weight loss, anorexia, or bone pain.

Breast mass

See the list below:

Mastitis

See the list below:

Breast abscess

See the list below:

Causes

Malignant

Risk factors for females include the following:

Risk factors for males are as follows:[35]

Exercise has been shown to decrease the risk of breast cancer in women at high risk for developing a malignancy. However, further studies are needed to verify this association and its relationship to preventing breast cancer in women on tamoxifen therapy (standard treatment for preventing breast cancer recurrence).[32]

Alcohol consumption has not been shown to increase the risk of developing breast cancer.[32]

Benign

Developmental breast lesions

Prepubertal and peripubertal developmental breast lesions may include abnormalities of embryology and gynecomastia.

Abnormalities of embryology include polythelia (accessory nipples) and polymastia (supernumerary breasts).

Gynecomastia is characterized by excessive development of breast tissues in males. It can be physiologic or pathologic in teens.

Neonatal breast hypertrophy is a common transient condition that results from elevation of maternal hormones, seen in up to 90% of all newborns.

Non-developmental breast lesions

Fibrocystic changes

Breast lobules may dilate and form cysts of varying sizes, due to hormonal changes in the menstrual cycle. Cysts are found in about 1 in 3 women aged 35-50 years.[15] Rupturing of the cysts can cause scarring and inflammation that leads to fibrotic changes, which feel rubbery, firm, or hard.

Hyperplasia

Hyperplasia is caused by an overgrowth of cells that line the ducts or lobules. About 1 in 4 women have mild or usual hyperplasia.[15] About 1 in 25 women have atypical hyperplasia (associated with an increased risk of malignancy).[15]

Adenosis

An increase in the number of glands.

Fibroadenoma [6, 16, 36]

Fibroadenoma is the most common cause of breast mass in women younger than 35 years and comprises 91% of all solid breast masses in females younger than 19 years.[36] These arise from the terminal duct lobular unit and appear clinically as singular, firm, rubbery, smooth, mobile, painless masses ranging in size from 1-5 cm. They may grow to a large size, thereby affecting the contours of the overlying skin and overall shape of the breast. Ultrasonography reveals a well-defined hypoechoic homogeneous mass 1-20 cm in diameter.[16, 36] Fibroadenomas appear as multiple masses in 10%-15% of patients.[16]



View Image

Breast adenoma. A) A breast adenoma is oval with well-defined borders. It may be hypoechoic and some internal echogenicity may be seen. It is wider th....



View Image

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. A) This is the same abscess seen in the above image and is imaged with a curvilinear transducer to better appre....



View Image

Purulent breast abscess. A) A purulent breast abscess is seen. The fluid is echogenic, but can be recognized as a disruption of the surrounding tissue....



View Video

Complex breast abscess. In this clip, the features of a loculated breast abscess containing echogenic purulent material are noted. Example of imaging with a linear high-frequency transducer.



View Video

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. In this clip, a large, loculated breast abscess and its features are noted. Example of imaging with a lower-frequency curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of this large abscess.

Phyllodes tumor [6, 36]

Phyllodes tumor is also known as cystosarcoma phyllodes or giant fibroadenoma. Although generally benign, a malignant variant occurs in 10% of cases. Incidence is highest among women aged 40-60 years. Phyllodes tumor is also the most common primary breast malignancy in adolescents.[36] The most common presentation is that of a large (average 5 cm), solitary, firm, breast nodule. Ultrasonographic findings of the mass may appear identical to those of a fibroadenoma with well-circumscribed borders and small cysts.[36]

Papillary adenoma of the nipple [6]

Papillary adenoma is also known as erosive adenomatosis of the nipple, adenoma of the nipple, florid papillomatosis of the nipple, and subareolar duct papillomatosis of the nipple. This is believed to arise from terminal lactiferous ducts. Incidence is highest among women aged 40-50 years. It commonly presents with unilateral serous or bloody nipple discharge that increases before menses.

Vascular lesions

Vascular lesions are usually benign. The most common form is hemangioma. Surgical excision may be required.[36]

Infectious

Breast abscess

Puerperal breast abscesses most often contain S aureus and streptococcal species. Methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) has become increasingly common.[24] The overall rate of breastfeeding cessation among patients with breast abscess was 41% in a US cohort and did not differ between MRSA and MSSA infections.[37] In a US cohort, 81% of S aureus–confirmed cultures were MRSA pulsed-field type USA 300–0114.[37] Nonpuerperal abscesses typically contain mixed flora (S aureus, streptococcal species) and anaerobes.[3] Diabetes is strongly associated with incidence and clinical outcomes of breast abscesses in nonlactating women. One study demonstrated a 72% prevalence of diabetes in women with nonpuerperal abscesses.[38] Cigarette smoking is a debated risk factor but has been shown to have a strong association with development of nonpuerperal mastitis.[39, 24, 3, 25, 40] Primary breast abscess has also been reported to be more common in African Americans[25] and those with obesity,[25] and a possible association with inadequate vitamin A supplementation has also been described.[8] Nipple piercing has been associated with increased risk of developing subareolar breast abscess.[40]



View Image

Loculated breast abscess. A) A large loculated abscess is seen containing hypoechoic fluid and some internal echoes. Posterior acoustic enhancement is....

Mastitis

Mastitis occurs in up to 33% of lactating women, with its highest incidence within 6 weeks postpartum or while weaning breastfeeding.[18, 41, 42, 42] Periductal mastitis comprises 3%-4% of all benign lesions of the breast.[6] It may be associated with milk stasis caused by ineffective positioning of the baby, limited feeding, or restricted feeding.[9] Of infective mastitis cases, S aureus is the most common cause. Streptococci, enterococci, S epidermidis, Peptostreptococcus species, Prevotella species, and Escherichia coli are less common causes. True fungal mastitis is rare and should prompt evaluation for coexisting diabetes mellitus. In infants, infections with Shigella, E coli, and Klebsiella species have been reported.[22] Mastitis that is refractory to appropriate treatment should prompt evaluation for tuberculous mastitis.[12]

Complications

Potential complications are as follows:

Laboratory Studies

In patients suspected of having a breast abscess, a CBC count with differential may be helpful. Send an aerobic and anaerobic culture during surgical drainage.

Imaging Studies

Ultrasonography is used to distinguish solid from cystic structures and to direct needle aspiration for abscess drainage. Simple cysts are seen on sonograms as round or oval with sharply defined margins and posterior acoustic enhancement. Complex cysts are characterized by a significant solid component, septations, lobulations, varied wall thickness, and the presence of internal debris. Abscesses usually appear as ill-defined masses with central hypoechoic areas and may display internal septations, debris, posterior enhancement, eccentrically thickened walls, and increased Doppler flow in the walls and surrounding tissue with lack of internal color Doppler flow.[43, 44, 8, 36, 30] The addition of elastography and color Doppler ultrasonography to B-mode ultrasonography has been reported to increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts (from 8.9% [95% CI: 7%, 11.2%] to 23.2% [95% CI: 18.5%, 28.5%; P< .001]) while reducing the number of false-positive findings without missing cancers.[45]



View Image

Breast cyst. A) A simple, fairly round breast cyst with hypo or anechoic contents and well-defined borders; B) Posterior acoustic enhancement is seen ....

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has also been found to be helpful in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses. This modality has been shown to be 86% sensitive and 79% specific for differentiating between the two types of masses.[46] For more information, see Breast Cancer, Ultrasonography.

Various types of breast masses are shown in the images below.



View Image

Ultrasonogram demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with smooth, partially lobulated margins typical of a fibroadenoma.



View Image

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Mediolateral oblique digital mammogram of the right breast in a 66-year-old woman with a new, opaque, irregular mass a....



View Image

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Antiradial sonogram of the spiculated mass (shown in the image above) demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with angular marg....

Schedule an outpatient mammography to further characterize the suspected breast mass. The sensitivity of mammography ranges from 74%-95%, and specificity ranges from 89%-99%.[47, 48] In a meta-analysis of more than 8.5 million patients, the AUC of mammography for breast cancer screening was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), the overall sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI : 0.77-0.84), and the overall specificity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.96).[49] A subgroup analysis of dense-breast populations showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity of mammography was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.61-0.83) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96), respectively.[49]

Early detection with screening mammography significantly reduces breast cancer–related mortality by 20%-40%.[50] Annual screening mammography of women aged 40-84 years prevents more deaths due to breast cancer than biennial screening of women aged 50-74 years.[50] Currently, supplemental screening with ultrasonography or MRI is recommended in addition to mammography.[50] The American Cancer Society recommends annual screening mammography and supplemental screening MRI in women with an estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20%, BRCA mutation carriers, first-degree relatives of BRCA mutation carriers who remain untested, women with a history of mediastinal irradiation aged 10-30 years, and women with certain genetic syndromes.[50] With aggressive public screening, the incidence of large breast tumors may be decreasing.[51] However, with increased screening comes the risk of overdiagnosis.

Approximately 5%-10% of screening examinations are interpreted as abnormal, but 90% of women with abnormal results do not have breast cancer.[47, 48] For instance, the Canadian National Breast Screening Study concluded that approximately 30% of invasive screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-49 years and 20% of those screen-detected in women aged 50-59 years were overdiagnosed.[52] Moreover, a subsequent meta-analysis reported no significant effect on either breast cancer mortality or all-cause mortality when breast cancer screening was extended to women aged 40-49 years, but the rates of overdiagnosis were estimated to be 32% at 5 years following cessation of screening and 48% at 20 years following cessation.[53] For these reasons (and others), current guidelines do not recommend extending routine mammography screening to younger age groups.[53] However, when screening women with dense breasts, the addition of bedside ultrasonography may be useful. In a cohort of 66,680 women undergoing physician-performed ultrasonography in addition to mammography, the sensitivity of mammography with ultrasonography rose from 61.5% to 81.3%.[54]

Racial disparities in utilization of screening mammography are evident in black and Hispanic populations in the United States.[55] Further studies are needed to understand reasons for disparities, trends over time, and the effectiveness of interventions targeting these disparities.[55]

For more information, see Breast, Benign Calcifications, Breast, Fibroadenoma, Breast, Nipple Discharge Evaluation, and Breast Cancer, Mammography.

Supplemental ultrasonography improves cancer detection in screening of women at average risk. When comparing screening with mammography alone versus mammography plus physician–performed ultrasonography in average-risk women, the overall sensitivity of mammography alone was 86.6% (non-dense breast) and 61.5% (dense breast) versus 95% (non-dense breast) and 81.3% (dense breast) for mammography with ultrasonography.[54] Adjunctive ultrasonography increased the recall rate from 10.5 to 16.5 per 1000 women screened and increased the biopsy rate from 6.3 to 9.3 per 1000 women screened.[54] The positive predictive value of biopsy was 55.5% (95% CI: 50.6%–60.3%) for mammography alone and 43.3 (95% CI: 39.4%–47.3%) for combined mammography plus ultrasonography.[54]

Computer-aided digital breast tomosynthesis is a new imaging modality that has shown some promise as an additional (or even sole) screening tool for breast cancer. Current studies of computer-aided digital breast tomosynthesis show sensitivity of detecting masses and microcalcifications ranging between 85% and 89%. Its utility in detecting masses in dense breast tissue is still a debated topic. Current US guidelines have recommended against its routine use.[56]

MRI may also be helpful in select cases. On diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), profoundly low apparent diffusion coefficient values were a distinguishing sign of breast abscess due to necrotic breast cancer.[57]

Various breast masses are shown in the mammograms below.



View Image

Craniocaudal mammograms obtained 1 year apart demonstrate a newly developing mass in the outer part of the breast.



View Image

Spot compression mammogram of the outer part of the breast demonstrates a new mass as smooth, margined, and oval. The findings are consistent with a f....



View Image

Eggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have walls thinner than those of lucent-centered calcifications.



View Image

This mass with associated large, coarse calcifications (arrows) is a degenerating fibroadenoma.



View Video

Complex breast abscess. In this clip, the features of a loculated breast abscess containing echogenic purulent material are noted. Example of imaging with a linear high-frequency transducer.



View Video

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. In this clip, a large, loculated breast abscess and its features are noted. Example of imaging with a lower-frequency curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of this large abscess.

Procedures

Breast abscesses may be drained with incision and drainage (versus ultrasound-guided needle aspiration and irrigation). Historically, incision and drainage was considered the standard of care for abscesses. Although this method has a lower reoccurrence rate, it is more invasive than needle aspiration and frequently results in scarring with structural damage and poor cosmetic outcomes.[58] Fine-needle aspiration should be considered first-line therapy for abscesses smaller than 5 cm owing to its lower risks, followed by incision and drainage if recurrence occurs.[4] Surgical excision may be required for infected or obstructed lactiferous ducts and provides a lower rate of recurrence for nonpuerperal abscess and mastitis.[59, 8]

Ultrasound-guided needle aspirations are more successful on abscesses smaller than 3 cm and on puerperal abscesses.[60, 61, 62, 8] Loculations are associated with failure of resolution with aspiration, regardless of abscess volume.[63] Nonpuerperal abscesses have a higher rate of recurrence and often require multiple drainage attempts.[8] Regardless of the underlying organism, the need for repeat aspiration is common in patients treated with aspiration versus incision and drainage.[64] In a US cohort of 54 abscess cases treated with needle-guided aspiration, the median number of drainage procedures was 2 (interquartile range, 1.0-4.0), with 24% requiring 5 or more drainage procedures.[37]

Vacuum-assisted biopsy is a viable option for the management of lactational breast abscesses and has been associated with a shorter healing time than simple needle aspiration.[65] Furthermore, percutaneous catheter drainage may be considered for larger abscesses.[4, 66]

Emergency Department Care

Breast mass

Definitive diagnosis of the etiology can only be made by pathologic examination and is not an emergency. Timely follow-up care, including mammography and involvement of primary physician and surgeon, is essential.

Finding a breast mass can be stressful for patients; provide reassurance that not all breast masses are malignant.

Mastitis

For detailed therapy, see Mastitis Empiric Therapy and Mastitis Organism-Specific Therapy.

In general, mastitis is treated with antibiotic therapy for 10-14 days, warm or cold compresses, and continued breast emptying via breastfeeding or breast pumping every 2 hours or when engorged.

Antibiotic therapy with continued breast emptying has been shown to be superior to breast emptying alone for resolving symptoms, decreasing recurrence rate, and decreasing the risk of abscess development.[1, 9] The addition of appropriate antibiotic administration may relieve symptoms in 2.1 days, as compared with 4.2 days for supportive care or 6.7 days if no action is taken.[9] In breastfeeding mothers, use beta-lactamase stable penicillin. Other choices include dicloxacillin 500 mg orally 4 times daily or cephalexin 500 mg orally 4 times daily for 10-14 days. Instruct patients who are lactating that continued breastfeeding from the affected breast is not harmful to the baby. For nonpuerperal mastitis, use clindamycin 600 mg intravenously every 8 hours or 300 mg orally every 6 hours, or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg orally 3 times daily.[67] If a breast abscess is suspected in a nursing mother, the affected breast should not be used to nurse the baby owing to the risk of passing infection to the baby.[4]

Breast abscess

Historically, incision and drainage was considered the standard of care for abscesses. Although this method yields a lower reoccurrence rate, it is more invasive than needle aspiration and frequently results in scarring with structural damage and poor cosmetic outcomes.[58] Fine-needle aspiration should be considered first-line therapy for abscesses smaller than 5 cm owing to its lower risks, followed by incision and drainage if recurrence occurs.[4] Although success has been reported with oral antistaphylococcal antibiotics and serial aspiration,[68] surgical excision may be required for infected or obstructed lactiferous ducts and provides a lower rate of recurrence for nonpuerperal abscess and mastitis.[59, 8]

For persistent lesions, treatment options may include ultrasound-guided needle aspiration,[20] percutaneous drainage catheter,[66, 66] and/or surgical drainage. Ultrasound-guided needle aspirations are more successful for abscesses smaller than 3 cm and for puerperal abscesses.[60, 61, 62, 8, 69] Loculations are associated with failure of resolution with aspiration, regardless of abscess volume.[63] Nonpuerperal abscesses have a higher recurrence rate and often require multiple drainage attempts.[8] Regardless of the underlying organism, the need for repeat aspiration is common in patients treated with aspiration versus incision and drainage.[64] In a US cohort of 54 abscess cases treated with needle-guided aspiration, the median number of drainage procedures was 2 (interquartile range, 1.0-4.0), with 24% requiring 5 or more drainage procedures.[37]

Vacuum-assisted biopsy is a viable option for the management of lactational breast abscesses and has been associated with a shorter healing time than simple needle aspiration.[65] ​ Furthermore, percutaneous catheter drainage may be considered for larger abscesses.[4, 66]

Consultations

Patients with breast masses require a general surgeon for definitive treatment. Immediate consultation in the ED is not mandatory, but it may help facilitate faster follow-up care once patients are discharged from the hospital.

Patients with mastitis unresolved by a single course of correct antibiotics need urgent referral to a surgical breast specialist.[11] Similarly, refer patients with breast abscesses for surveillance of complications and possible recurrent breast abscesses.

Long-Term Monitoring

Breast mass screening

For breast cancer screening guidelines, see the Guidelines section.

Future studies are needed to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years. Some research shows a modest decrease in breast cancer mortality when women in this age group are screened; however, further research is needed to compare risks of overdiagnosis (one study suggests 1 in 424 women screened would be overdiagnosed) versus potential benefits of screening.[29, 70]

Similar rates of cancer detection have been found between short-term interval follow-up (SIFU) and return to annual screening (RTAS) after benign breast biopsy with no significant differences in stage, tumor size, or nodal status, although the present study was limited by sample size.[71] Additionally, positive predictive values have been reported not to change in patients receiving 6 and 12-month re-biopsy follow-up.[72] These findings suggest that patients with benign radiologic-pathologic-concordant percutaneous breast biopsy results could return to annual screening.

Mastitis

In addition to therapeutic breast emptying (if indicated), antibiotic therapy, and warm or cold compresses, emerging evidence suggests that therapeutic administration of lactobacilli strains that are naturally occurring in breast milk may be of therapeutic benefit for the management of infectious mastitis during lactation.[73, 9]

Mastitis that is refractory to standard treatment (see above) should prompt further workup to rule out uncommon infectious etiologies, granulomatous diseases, and/or idiopathic causes.[12]

Recurrent periductal mastitis may require combined total excision of the affected duct and the fistulous tract with encouraged smoking cessation (if applicable).[74]

Treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis usually involves corticosteroids and methotrexate, with or without surgery.

Further Inpatient Care

Consider admitting patients with large or complex breast abscesses for pain management, parenteral antibiotic therapy, and definitive management. Admit patients with sepsis due to mastitis. Consider diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with nonpuerperal breast abscess.

Treatment may include incision and drainage, fine-needle aspiration, vacuum-assisted aspiration, and fistulectomy in the operating room. The wound can be left to close by secondary intention or with simple sutures over a drain.[75, 4] Cultures of the drained fluid should be obtained at this time and sent to determine antimicrobial susceptibility.[4]

Inpatient and Outpatient Medications

Prescribe pain medication to patients with a breast abscess as necessary. NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, are preferred because they are not transferred through breastmilk. Preparations combining acetaminophen with codeine, oxycodone, or hydrocodone may be used depending on the level of discomfort but should be avoided in breastfeeding mothers with concern for sedation and respiratory depression in the infant.

Prescribe parenteral narcotics for pain control while awaiting definitive surgical therapy.

Continue antibiotic therapy for 14 days after drainage.

Transfer

Transfer typically is not necessary for patients with breast mass, abscess, or mastitis.

Guidelines Summary

Multiple guidelines are available pertaining to breast cancer screening. The 3 most cited include those by the American College of Physicians (2015), the American Cancer Society (2015), and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (2016).

American College of Physicians (ACP) screening guidelines recommend the following:[76]

American Cancer Society (ACS) screening guidelines recommend the following:[77]

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines recommend the following:[78]

The above guidelines share the following recommendations:

ACP and ACS guidelines do not recommend the use of MRI or digital breast tomosynthesis for the purposes of breast cancer screening. USPSTF has found insufficient evidence to provide a recommendation about either of these breast cancer screening modalities.

French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) screening guidelines recommend the following:[79]

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity, prevent complications and eradicate the infection.

Empiric therapy should have activity against S aureus, a common pathogen of primary breast abscess. Other pathogens may include methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pyogenes, E coli, Bacteroides species, Corynebacterium species, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Pseudomonasaeruginosa, Proteusmirabilis, and anaerobes. Therapy should be tailored to results of cultures and susceptibilities, if applicable.

Recurrent breast abscesses have an increased risk for mixed flora and anaerobic pathogens.

Antibiotics should be continued for 10-14 days.

Outpatient therapy for non-severe infection without MRSA risk: dicloxacillin or cephalexin or amoxicillin-clavulanate

Outpatient therapy in patients with hypersensitivity to beta-lactams: clarithromycin or doxycycline

Outpatient therapy for non-severe infection with MRSA risk: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or clindamycin. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may be associated with an increased risk of allergic reactions relative to other MRSA-directed therapies.[80, 81]

Inpatient therapy for severe infection without risk of MRSA: nafcillin or oxacillin or ampicillin-sulbactam

Inpatient therapy for severe infection with risk of MRSA or in patients with beta-lactam allergy: clindamycin or vancomycin or linezolid or tigecycline or daptomycin

Emerging therapies include ceftaroline or dalbavancin or delafloxacin or oritavancin. These drugs have been approved by the FDA for treatment of soft-tissue infections but have not yet been studied specifically for treating breast infections.

Class Summary

Antibacterial therapy must cover all likely pathogens in the context of the clinical setting.

Dicloxacillin

Clinical Context:  Outpatient therapy

Drug of choice (DOC) for mastitis. Bactericidal antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis. Used to treat infections caused by penicillinase-­producing staphylococci. May be used to initiate therapy when a staphylococcal infection is suspected.

Amoxicillin/clavulanate (Augmentin, Augmentin ES-600, Augmentin XR)

Clinical Context:  Outpatient therapy

Amoxicillin binds to penicillin­-binding proteins, thus inhibiting final transpeptidation step of peptidoglycan synthesis in bacterial cell walls; addition of clavulanate inhibits beta-­lactamase–producing bacteria, allowing amoxicillin extended spectrum of action

It is a semisynthetic antibiotic with a broad spectrum of bactericidal activity, covering both gram-­negative and gram-­positive microorganisms.

Nafcillin

Clinical Context:  Inpatient therapy

DOC for puerperal breast abscess. Used to treat infections caused by penicillinase-­producing staphylococci. Used to initiate therapy when a penicillin G–resistant staphylococcal infection is suspected.

Because of occasional occurrence of thrombophlebitis associated with parenteral route (particularly in elderly persons), administer parenterally only for a short term (24-­48 hours) and change to a PO equivalent, if clinically possible.

Oxacillin (Bactocill)

Clinical Context:  Inpatient therapy

Bactericidal antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis. Used in the treatment of infections caused by penicillinase­-producing staphylococci. May be used to initiate therapy when a staphylococcal infection is suspected.

Ampicillin/sulbactam (Unasyn)

Clinical Context:  Inpatient therapy

Alternative DOC for nonpuerperal breast abscess. Drug combination that utilizes a beta-­lactamase inhibitor with ampicillin.

Covers skin, enteric flora, and anaerobes. Not ideal for nosocomial pathogens.

Cephalexin (Keflex, Daxbia)

Clinical Context:  Outpatient therapy

Cephalexin is a first-generation cephalosporin that binds to penicillin-binding proteins, therefore inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis. May be used to initiate therapy when a staphylococcal infection is suspected. Lacks coverage of gram-negative pathogens.

Ceftaroline (Teflaro)

Clinical Context:  Emerging therapy

Beta­-lactam cephalosporin with activity against aerobic and anaerobic gram-­positive and aerobic gram-­negative bacteria.

Demonstrates activity in vivo against resistant MRSA strains and in vitro against vancomycin-­resistant and linezolid­-resistant S aureus.

Pregnancy Category B, effects unknown. Unknown if secreted in breast milk; use caution if breastfeeding.

Delafloxacin (Baxdela)

Clinical Context:  Emerging treatment

Fluoroquinolone antibiotic that inhibits enzymes required for bacterial synthesis.

In vitro activity against S aureus (including MRSA), Streptococcus species, E coli, K pneumoniae, E cloacae, and P aeruginosa.

Limited data regarding use in pregnancy and lactation.

Vancomycin

Clinical Context:  Inpatient treatment

DOC for patients with puerperal breast abscess who are penicillin-allergic, as well as those with suspected MRSA infection. It is a potent antibiotic directed against gram­-positive organisms and active against enterococcal species. Useful in treatment of septicemia and skin structure infections. Indicated for patients who cannot receive or have failed to respond to penicillins and cephalosporins or who have infections with resistant staphylococci.

To avoid toxicity, current recommendation is to assay vancomycin trough levels after the third dose drawn 0.5 hour before next dosing. Use CrCl to adjust dose in renal impairment, prn.

Caution: Vancomycin can cross the placenta and into breast milk. Use caution in pregnant and breastfeeding mothers.

Dalbavancin (Dalvance)

Clinical Context:  Emerging treatment

Lipoglycopeptide antibiotic; interferes with cell wall synthesis by binding to D-alanyl-D-alanine terminus of the stem pentapeptide in nascent cell wall peptidoglycan, thus preventing cross­linking.

Bactericidal in vitro against S aureus and S pyogenes at concentrations observed in humans at recommended doses.

Caution: Pregnancy category C, the long half-­life of dalbavancin should be considered before using in pregnancy. Unknown if secreted in breast milk.

Oritavancin (Orbactiv)

Clinical Context:  Emerging treatment

Lipoglycopeptide antibiotic; interferes with bacteria cell wall synthesis by inhibiting transglycosidation and transpeptidation. Also disrupts the integrity of bacterial membranes, leading to cell death.

Exhibits concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against S aureus (including MRSA), Streptococcus species, and Enterococcus faecalis (not VRE).

Caution: Pregnancy category C. Unknown if distributed in human breast milk.

Tigecycline (Tygacil)

Clinical Context:  Inpatient treatment

If MRSA risk with beta-lactam allergy.

A glycylcycline antibiotic that is structurally similar to tetracycline antibiotics; inhibits bacterial protein translation by binding to 30S ribosomal subunit and blocks entry of amino­acyl tRNA molecules in ribosome A site.

Caution: Pregnancy Category D. Unknown, but suspected to be secreted in breast milk; do not use in pregnancy or if breastfeeding.

Linezolid (Zyvox)

Clinical Context:  Inpatient or outpatient treatment

If MRSA risk with beta-lactam allergy.

Binds to bacterial 23S rRNA of the 50S subunit to prevent protein translation; also elicits nonselective MAO inhibition.

Caution: Pregnancy category C; secreted in breast milk, use caution if used while breastfeeding.

Clindamycin (Cleocin)

Clinical Context:  Outpatient or inpatient therapy

Clindamycin is a semisynthetic antibiotic produced by 7(S)-chloro-substitution of the 7(R)-hydroxyl group of the parent compound, lincomycin. It inhibits bacterial growth, possibly by blocking dissociation of peptidyl tRNA from ribosomes, causing RNA-dependent protein synthesis to arrest. Clindamycin is widely distributed in the body without penetrating the central nervous system (CNS). It is protein-bound and excreted by the liver and kidneys.

Daptomycin (Cubicin)

Clinical Context:  Inpatient treatment

If MRSA risk with beta-lactam allergy.

Cyclic lipopeptide: Binds to bacterial membranes and causes rapid depolarization of membrane potential; causes inhibition of protein, DNA, RNA synthesis, and bacterial cell death.

Pregnancy category B, successful use during second and third trimesters of pregnancy reported but limited information available. Secreted in breast milk in low concentrations, however, it is poorly bioavailable orally; use caution if breastfeeding.

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim, Bactrim DS)

Clinical Context:  Outpatient therapy

For non-severe MRSA infections.

Trimethoprim: Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, thereby blocking production of tetrahydrofolic acid from dihydrofolic acid.

Sulfamethoxazole: Inhibits bacterial synthesis of dihydrofolic acid by competing with para­aminobenzoic acid.

Caution: Pregnancy category D. Medication crosses into breast milk. Avoid use in breastfeeding mother if nursing preterm infants, infants <2 months, or children with known or suspected glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.

Doxycycline (Acticlate, Adoxa, Doryx, Morgidox, Vibramycin)

Clinical Context:  Outpatient or inpatient therapy

If beta-lactam hypersensitivity.

Doxycycline is a tetracycline. Inhibits protein synthesis and, thus, bacterial growth by binding to 30S and possibly 50S ribosomal subunits of susceptible bacteria; may block dissociation of peptidyl t­RNA from ribosomes, causing RNA-­dependent protein synthesis to arrest.

Caution: Pregnancy Category D and secreted in breast milk; do not use in pregnancy or if breastfeeding.

What are breast abscesses and masses?What is the pathophysiology of breast abscesses and masses?What is the prevalence of breast abscesses and masses?What are the mortality rates for breast masses?What is the morbidity of breast abscess and masses?What are the racial predilections for breast abscesses and masses?How does the incidence of breast abscesses and masses vary by sex?How does the incidence of breast abscesses and masses vary by age?How does access to care affect women with breast abscesses and masses?What is the prognosis of breast abscesses and masses?What should be included in patient information about breast abscesses and masses?Which history findings are characteristic of breast masses?Which history findings are characteristic of mastitis?Which history findings are characteristic of breast abscess?Which physical findings suggest breast mass?Which physical findings suggest mastitis?Which physical signs suggest breast abscess?What are the risk factors for malignant breast abscesses and masses in women?What are the risk factors for malignant breast abscesses and masses in men?What is the role of exercise and alcohol in the etiology of breast abscesses and masses?What are the developmental causes of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of fibrocystic changes in the etiology of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of hyperplasia in the etiology of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of adenosis and fibroadenoma in the etiology of breast masses?What is the role of papillary adenoma in the etiology of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of vascular lesions in the etiology of breast abscesses and masses?What are the infectious causes of breast abscesses?What are the infectious causes of mastitis related to breast abscesses and masses?What are the potential complications of breast abscesses and masses?What are the differential diagnoses for Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which lab studies are performed in the workup of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of computer-aided digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of MRI in the diagnosis of breast abscesses and masses?What is the appearance of breast abscesses and masses on mammograms?What is the role of incision and drainage in the management of breast abscesses and masses?How is the etiology of breast abscesses and masses definitively determined?What is the role of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of mastitis?What are the options for emergency department (ED) treatment of breast abscess?Which specialist consultations are needed for the diagnosis and management of breast abscesses and masses?What is included in after treatment monitoring of breast masses?What are the treatment options for mastitis?When is inpatient care indicated for breast abscesses and masses?Which medications are used in the treatment of breast abscesses and masses?When is transfer indicated for patients with breast abscesses and masses?What are the most cited guidelines for breast cancer screening?What are the American College of Physicians (ACP) breast cancer screening guidelines?What are the American Cancer Society (ACS) breast cancer screening guidelines?What are the USPSTF breast cancer screening guidelines?What recommendations are shared by the major breast cancer screening guidelines?What are the guidelines for use of MRI or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening?What are the French College of Gynecologists Obstetricians (CNGOF) breast cancer screening guidelines?What are the goals of drug treatment for breast abscesses and masses?What is the role of empiric therapy in the treatment of breast abscesses and masses?Which medications are used in outpatient therapy for breast abscesses and masses?Which medications are used for inpatient therapy for breast abscesses and masses?Which medications are emerging as possible therapy for breast abscesses and masses?Which medications in the drug class Tetracyclines are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Sulfonamides are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Lipopeptides are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Lincosamide are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Oxazolidinones are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Glycylcyclines are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Glycopeptides are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Fluoroquinolones are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Cephalosporins, 4th Generation are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Cephalosporins, 1st Generation are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Penicillins are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?Which medications in the drug class Antibiotics are used in the treatment of Breast Abscesses and Masses?

Author

Andrew C Miller, MD, Associate Professor, Chief, Research Division, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Alexandra R King, PharmD, DABAT, Clinical Pharmacist, Emergency Medicine and Toxicology, Vidant Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dalal H Alsaggabi, MD, Postdoctoral Research Scientist/Fellow, Langone Medical Center, New York University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Barry J Sheridan, DO, Chief Warrior in Transition Services, Brooke Army Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jeter (Jay) Pritchard Taylor, III, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Clinical Instructor, Compliance Officer, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palmetto Richland Hospital

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Employed contractor - Chief Editor for Medscape.

Additional Contributors

Caitlin Kennedy, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Celia Escamilla, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Vidant Medical Center, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John W Hall, IV, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joseph J Minardi, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medical Education, West Virginia University School of Medicine; Director of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University Hospitals

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: General Electric.

Suha Abdulkarim Khafaji, MBBS, Research Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors, Sadia Hussain, MD, Tajinderpal Saraon, MD, Mark Silverberg, MD, Howard A Blumstein, MD, and Amy K Rontal, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Dixon JM. ABC of breast diseases. Breast infection. BMJ. 1994 Oct 8. 309(6959):946-9. [View Abstract]
  2. Dixon JM. Outpatient treatment of non-lactational breast abscesses. Br J Surg. 1992 Jan. 79(1):56-7. [View Abstract]
  3. Dixon JM. Breast infection. BMJ. 2013 Dec 16. 347:f3291. [View Abstract]
  4. Lam E, Chan T, Wiseman SM. Breast abscess: evidence based management recommendations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jul. 12 (7):753-62. [View Abstract]
  5. Kaneda HJ, Mack J, Kasales CJ, Schetter S. Pediatric and adolescent breast masses: a review of pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb. 200 (2):W204-12. [View Abstract]
  6. Whitaker-Worth DL, Carlone V, Susser WS, et al. Dermatologic diseases of the breast and nipple. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Nov. 43(5 Pt 1):733-51; quiz 752-4. [View Abstract]
  7. Bland, Copeland, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Disorders. 3rd ed. Saunders; 2004.
  8. Kasales CJ, Han B, Smith JS Jr, Chetlen AL, Kaneda HJ, Shereef S. Nonpuerperal mastitis and subareolar abscess of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Feb. 202 (2):W133-9. [View Abstract]
  9. Jahanfar S, Ng CJ, Teng CL. Antibiotics for mastitis in breastfeeding women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28. 2:CD005458. [View Abstract]
  10. Huizhen F, Qixia Y, Yuying D, Yun Z. Analysis of risk factors for progression of lactating mastitis to breast abscess. Zhejiang Med. 2016. 24:1986-1988.
  11. Dixon JM, Khan LR. Treatment of breast infection. BMJ. 2011 Feb 11. 342:d396. [View Abstract]
  12. Sheybani F, Sarvghad M, Naderi HR, Gharib M. Treatment for and clinical characteristics of granulomatous mastitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr. 125 (4):801-7. [View Abstract]
  13. Ooi PS, Draman N, Yusoff SSM, Zain WZW, Ganasagaran D, Chua HH. Mammary Paget’s Disease of the Nipple: Relatively Common but Still Unknown to Many. Korean Journal of Family Medicine. 2018 Nov 29. kjfm.17.0143.
  14. Wu Q, Ding X, Li J, Sun S, Zhu S, Wu J, et al. Surgical treatment in Paget’s disease with invasive ductal carcinoma: an observational study based on SEER. Scientific Reports. 2017 Apr 19. 7:45510.
  15. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009-2010. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/BreastCancerFactsFigures/breast-cancer-facts--figures-2009-2010. Accessed: Feb 1, 2010.
  16. Givens ML, Luszczak M. Breast disorders: a review for emergency physicians. J Emerg Med. 2002 Jan. 22(1):59-65. [View Abstract]
  17. Jahanfar S, Ng CJ, Teng CL. Antibiotics for mastitis in breastfeeding women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28. 2:CD005458. [View Abstract]
  18. Mass S. Breast pain: engorgement, nipple pain and mastitis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep. 47(3):676-82. [View Abstract]
  19. Bender PF, de Oliveira LL, Costa CR, de Aguiar SS, Bergmann A, Thuler LC. Men and women show similar survival rates after breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr. 143 (4):563-571. [View Abstract]
  20. Choi MY, Lee SK, Lee JE, Park HS, Lim ST, Jung Y, et al. Characterization of Korean Male Breast Cancer Using an Online Nationwide Breast-Cancer Database: Matched-Pair Analysis of Patients With Female Breast Cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr. 95 (16):e3299. [View Abstract]
  21. Efrat M, Mogilner JG, Iujtman M, et al. Neonatal mastitis--diagnosis and treatment. Isr J Med Sci. 1995 Sep. 31(9):558-60. [View Abstract]
  22. De Silva NK, Brandt ML. Disorders of the breast in children and adolescents, Part 1: Disorders of growth and infections of the breast. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Oct. 19(5):345-9. [View Abstract]
  23. Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Menashe I, Mitani A, Pfeiffer RM. Age-related crossover in breast cancer incidence rates between black and white ethnic groups. J Natl Cancer Inst. Dec 2007. 100(24):1804-14. [View Abstract]
  24. Branch-Elliman W, Golen TH, Gold HS, Yassa DS, Baldini LM, Wright SB. Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus postpartum breast abscess. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 1. 54(1):71-7. [View Abstract]
  25. Bharat A, Gao F, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Eberlein TJ, Margenthaler JA. Predictors of primary breast abscesses and recurrence. World J Surg. 2009 Dec. 33 (12):2582-6. [View Abstract]
  26. Nguyen C, Kettler MD, Swirsky ME, Miller VI, Scott C, Krause R, et al. Male breast disease: pictorial review with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2013 May. 33(3):763-79. [View Abstract]
  27. Günhan-Bilgen I, Bozkaya H, Ustün E, Memis A. Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 2002 Sep. 43(3):246-55. [View Abstract]
  28. Nguyen-Pham S, Leung J, McLaughlin D. Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Mar. 24 (3):228-35. [View Abstract]
  29. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11. 348:g366. [View Abstract]
  30. Moseley TW, Stanley A, Wei W, Parikh JR. Impact on Clinical Management of After-Hours Emergent or Urgent Breast Ultrasonography in Patients with Clinically Suspected Breast Abscesses. Diagnostics. 2018 Feb 23. 8(1):17.
  31. Yu X, Zhou S, Wang J, Zhang Q, Hou J, Zhu L, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast Cancer. 2017. 24(5):643-657. [View Abstract]
  32. Land SR, Liu Q, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP, Ganz PA. Cigarette smoking, physical activity, and alcohol consumption as predictors of cancer incidence among women at high risk of breast cancer in the NSABP P-1 trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May. 23 (5):823-32. [View Abstract]
  33. Armstrong K, Eisen A, Weber B. Assessing the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 24. 342(8):564-71. [View Abstract]
  34. Zhou H, Lu K, Zheng L, Guo L, Gao Y, Miao X, et al. Prognostic significance of mammary Paget’s disease in Chinese women: a 10-year, population-based, matched cohort study. Onco Targets Ther. 2018. 11:8319-8326. [View Abstract]
  35. Ferzoco RM, Ruddy KJ. The Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016 Jan. 18 (1):1. [View Abstract]
  36. Kaneda HJ, Mack J, Kasales CJ, Schetter S. Pediatric and adolescent breast masses: a review of pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb. 200 (2):W204-12. [View Abstract]
  37. Branch-Elliman W, Lee GM, Golen TH, Gold HS, Baldini LM, Wright SB. Health and economic burden of post-partum Staphylococcus aureus breast abscess. PLoS ONE. 2013. 8(9):e73155.
  38. Rizzo M, Peng L, Frisch A, Jurado M, Umpierrez G. Breast abscesses in nonlactating women with diabetes: clinical features and outcome. Am J Med Sci. 2009 Aug. 338(2):123-6. [View Abstract]
  39. Schafer P, Fürrer C, Mermillod B. An association of cigarette smoking with recurrent subareolar breast abscess. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec. 17(4):810-3. [View Abstract]
  40. Gollapalli V, Liao J, Dudakovic A, Sugg SL, Scott-Conner CE, Weigel RJ. Risk factors for development and recurrence of primary breast abscesses. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jul. 211 (1):41-8. [View Abstract]
  41. Brennan M, Houssami N, French J. Management of benign breast conditions. Part 3--Other breast problems. Aust Fam Physician. 2005 May. 34(5):353-5. [View Abstract]
  42. Berens PD. Prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum support of the lactating mother. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Apr. 48(2):365-75. [View Abstract]
  43. Muttarak M, Chaiwun B. Imaging of giant breast masses with pathological correlation. Singapore Med J. 2004 Mar. 45(3):132-9. [View Abstract]
  44. Gao Y, Slanetz PJ, Eisenberg RL. Echogenic breast masses at US: to biopsy or not to biopsy?. Radiographics. 2013 Mar-Apr. 33(2):419-34. [View Abstract]
  45. Lee SH, Chung J, Choi HY, Choi SH, Ryu EB, Ko KH, et al. Evaluation of Screening US-detected Breast Masses by Combined Use of Elastography and Color Doppler US with B-Mode US in Women with Dense Breasts: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Radiology. 2017 Nov. 285 (2):660-669. [View Abstract]
  46. Hu Q, Wang XY, Zhu SY, Kang LK, Xiao YJ, Zheng HY. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 2015 Jan. 56 (1):25-33. [View Abstract]
  47. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, et al. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19. 139(4):274-84. [View Abstract]
  48. Kerlikowske K, Creasman J, Leung JW, et al. Differences in screening mammography outcomes among White, Chinese, and Filipino women. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 12. 165(16):1862-8. [View Abstract]
  49. Chen Z, Wang L, Lingbin D, Jing L, Juan Z, Min D, et al. [Meta-analysis of mammography applied to crowd screening accuracy]. Chinese J Epi. 2016. 37(9):1296-1305. Chinese.
  50. Niell BL, Freer PE, Weinfurtner RJ, Arleo EK, Drukteinis JS. Screening for Breast Cancer. Rad Clin North Am. 2017 Nov 1. 55(6):1145-1162.
  51. Molinié F, Delacour-Billon S, Tretarre B, Delafosse P, Seradour B, Colonna M. Breast cancer incidence: Decreasing trend in large tumours in women aged 50-74. J Med Screen. 2017. 24(4):189-194. [View Abstract]
  52. Baines CJ, To T, Miller AB. Revised estimates of overdiagnosis from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Prev Med. 2016. 90:66-71. [View Abstract]
  53. van den Ende C, Oordt-Speets AM, Vroling H, van Agt HME. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: A systematic review. Int J Cancer. 2017 Oct 1. 141(7):1295-1306. [View Abstract]
  54. Buchberger W, Geiger-Gritsch S, Knapp R, Gautsch K, Oberaigner W. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program. Eur J Rad. 2018. 101:24-29. [View Abstract]
  55. Ahmed AT, Welch BT, Brinjikji W, Farah WH, Henrichsen TL, Murad MH, et al. Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. 14(2):157-165.e9. [View Abstract]
  56. Morra L, Sacchetto D, Durando M, Agliozzo S, Carbonaro LA, Delsanto S, et al. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2015 Oct. 277 (1):56-63. [View Abstract]
  57. Wang C, Eghtedari M, Yang WT, Dogan BE. Diffusion-weighted imaging is helpful in the accurate non-invasive diagnosis of breast abscess: correlation with necrotic breast cancer. BMJ Case Rep. 2018 Mar 22. 2018:E17. [View Abstract]
  58. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Hakan Tekelioglu M, Daldal E. Management of lactational breast abscesses. Breast. Oct 2005. 14(5):375-9. [View Abstract]
  59. Ozseker B, Ozcan UA, Rasa K, Cizmeli OM. Treatment of breast abscesses with ultrasound-guided aspiration and irrigation in the emergency setting. Emerg Radiol. 2008 Mar. 15(2):105-8. [View Abstract]
  60. Thirumalaikumar S, Kommu S. Best evidence topic reports. Aspiration of breast abscesses. Emerg Med J. 21(3). May 2004:333-4. [View Abstract]
  61. Hook GW, Ikeda DM. Treatment of breast abscesses with US-guided percutaneous needle drainage without indwelling catheter placement. Radiology. 1999. 213:579-82. [View Abstract]
  62. Ozseker B, Ozcan UA, Rasa K, Cizmeli OM. Treatment of breast abscesses with ultrasound-guided aspiration and irrigation in the emergency setting. Emerg Radiol. Mar 2008. 15(2):105-8. [View Abstract]
  63. Elagili F, Abdullah N. Aspiration of Breast Abscess Under Ultrasound Guidance: Outcome Obtained and Factors Affecting Success. Asian J Surg. 2007. 30(1):40-44.
  64. Sarhan HH, Ibraheem OM. Percutaneous Needle Aspiration Is A Minimally Invasive Method For A Breast Abscess. Arch Clin Exp Surg. 2012. 1(2):105-109.
  65. Kang YD, Kim YM. Comparison of needle aspiration and vacuum-assisted biopsy in the ultrasound-guided drainage of lactational breast abscesses. Ultrasonography. 2016 Apr. 35 (2):148-52. [View Abstract]
  66. Falco G, Foroni M, Castagnetti F, Marano L, Bordoni D, Rocco N, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Large Breast Abscesses in Lactating Women: How to Preserve Breastfeeding Safely. Breastfeed Med. 2016 Dec. 11:555-556. [View Abstract]
  67. Barbosa-Cesnik C, Schwartz K, Foxman B. Lactation mastitis. JAMA. 2003 Apr 2. 289(13):1609-12. [View Abstract]
  68. Singh G, Singh G, Singh LR, Singh R, Singh S, Sharma KL. Management of breast abscess by repeated aspiration and antibiotics. Journal of Medical Society. 2012. 26:189-91.
  69. Sun H, Teng S, Huang B, Hsiao S, Yen M, Wang PP. Combination of ultrasound-guided drainage and antibiotics therapy provides a cosmetic advantage for women with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus breast abscess. Taiwan J Obstet Gyn. 2014. 53(1):115-117.
  70. Moss SM, Wale C, Smith R, Evans A, Cuckle H, Duffy SW. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep. 16 (9):1123-32. [View Abstract]
  71. Johnson JM, Johnson AK, O'Meara ES, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Hotaling EN, et al. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results. Radiology. 2015 Apr. 275 (1):54-60. [View Abstract]
  72. Salkowski LR, Fowler AM, Burnside ES, Sisney GA. Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result. Radiology. 2011 Feb. 258 (2):380-7. [View Abstract]
  73. Arroyo R, Martín V, Maldonado A, Jiménez E, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 2010. 50(12):1551-8. [View Abstract]
  74. Taffurelli M, Pellegrini A, Santini D, Zanotti S, Di Simone D, Serra M. Recurrent periductal mastitis: Surgical treatment. Surgery. 2016 Dec. 160 (6):1689-1692. [View Abstract]
  75. Irusen H, Rohwer AC, Steyn DW, Young T. Treatments for breast abscesses in breastfeeding women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17. 8:CD010490. [View Abstract]
  76. [Guideline] Wilt TJ, Harris RP, Qaseem A, High Value Care Task Force of the American College of Physicians. Screening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19. 162 (10):718-25. [View Abstract]
  77. [Guideline] Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar. 66 (2):95-114. [View Abstract]
  78. [Guideline] Siu AL, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16. 164 (4):279-96. [View Abstract]
  79. [Guideline] Lavoué V, Fritel X, Antoine M, Beltjens F, et al.: French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF): benign breast tumors - short text. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May. 200:16-23. [View Abstract]
  80. Shehab N, Patel PR, Srinivasan A, Budnitz DS. Emergency department visits for antibiotic-associated adverse events. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. 47:735-743. [View Abstract]
  81. Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016 Nov 22. 316(20):2115-2125. [View Abstract]
  82. [Guideline] U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17. 151(10):716-26, W-236. [View Abstract]
  83. Zylstra S, D'Orsi CJ, Ricci BA, et al. Defense of breast cancer malpractice claims. Breast J. 2001 Mar-Apr. 7(2):76-90. [View Abstract]
  84. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2007-2008. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/BreastCancerFactsFigures/index. Accessed: 04/01/2009.
  85. August DA, Sondak VK. Breast. Greenfield LJ, et al, eds. Surgery Scientific Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997. 1357-1415.
  86. Beckman C. Ling F, Barzansky B, Herbert W, Laube D, Smith R, eds. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
  87. Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep. 48(5):931-87. [View Abstract]
  88. Dener C, Inan A. Breast abscesses in lactating women. World J Surg. 2003 Feb. 27(2):130-3. [View Abstract]
  89. Dixon JM. Repeated aspiration of breast abscesses in lactating women. BMJ. 1988 Dec 10. 297(6662):1517-8. [View Abstract]
  90. Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 1994 Sep 28. 272(12):947-54. [View Abstract]
  91. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Hakan Tekelioglu M, Daldal E. Management of lactational breast abscesses. Breast. Oct 2005. 14(5):375-9. [View Abstract]
  92. Garcia CJ, Espinoza A, Dinamarca V, et al. Breast US in children and adolescents. Radiographics. 2000 Nov-Dec. 20(6):1605-12. [View Abstract]
  93. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, et al. Breast cancer (1). N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 30. 327(5):319-28. [View Abstract]
  94. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ambrogetti D, Catarzi S, Risso G, Bonardi R, et al. Florence-Sydney Breast Biopsy Study: sensitivity of ultrasound-guided versus freehand fine needle biopsy of palpable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Jan 2005. 89(1):55-9. [View Abstract]
  95. Karstrup S, Solvig J, Nolsoe CP, et al. Acute puerperal breast abscesses: US-guided drainage. Radiology. 1993. 188:807-9. [View Abstract]
  96. Khoda J, Lantsberg L, Yegev Y, et al. Management of periareolar abscess and mamillary fistula. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Oct. 175(4):306-8. [View Abstract]
  97. Kitchen PR. Management of sub-areolar abscess and mammary fistula. Aust N Z J Surg. 1991 Apr. 61(4):313-5. [View Abstract]
  98. Lau SK, McKee GT, Weir MM, Tambouret RH, Eichhorn JH, Pitman MB. The negative predicative value of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Breast J. Nov-Dec 2004. 10(6):487-91. [View Abstract]
  99. Liu H, Peng W. Morphological manifestations of nonpuerperal mastitis on magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun. 33(6):1369-74. [View Abstract]
  100. Maier WP, Au FC, Tang CK. Nonlactational breast infection. Am Surg. 1994 Apr. 60(4):247-50. [View Abstract]
  101. Meguid MM, Oler A, Numann PJ, et al. Pathogenesis-based treatment of recurring subareolar breast abscesses. Surgery. 1995 Oct. 118(4):775-82. [View Abstract]
  102. Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Hankey BF. The significance of the rising incidence of breast cancer in the United States. Important Adv Oncol. 1994. 193-207. [View Abstract]
  103. O'Hara RJ, Dexter SP, Fox JN. Conservative management of infective mastitis and breast abscesses after ultrasonographic assessment. Br J Surg. 1996 Oct. 83(10):1413-4. [View Abstract]
  104. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, SEER 17 Registries, 2000-2004. 2007;
  105. Walker AP, Edmiston CE, Krepel CJ, et al. A prospective study of the microflora of nonpuerperal breast abscess. Arch Surg. 1988. 123:908-11. [View Abstract]
  106. Watt-Boolsen S, Rasmussen NR, Blichert-Toft M. Primary periareolar abscess in the nonlactating breast: risk of recurrence. Am J Surg. 1987 Jun. 153(6):571-3. [View Abstract]
  107. Wiesenfeld HC, Sweet RL. Perinatal infections. Scott JR, et al, eds. Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology. 7th ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1994. 469.
  108. Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr. 125 (4):927-37. [View Abstract]
  109. Jahanfar S, Ng CJ, Teng CL. Antibiotics for mastitis in breastfeeding women. Sao Paulo Med J. 2016 May-Jun. 134 (3):273. [View Abstract]
  110. Kang Y, Kim YM. Comparison of needle aspiration and vacuum-assisted biopsy in the ultrasound-guided drainage of lactational breast abscesses. Ultrasonography. 2016. 35(2):148-152.
  111. Buchberger W, Geiger-Gritsch S, Knapp R, Gautsch K, Oberaigner W. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol. 2018. 101:24-29. [View Abstract]

Ultrasonogram demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with smooth, partially lobulated margins typical of a fibroadenoma.

Breast adenoma. A) A breast adenoma is oval with well-defined borders. It may be hypoechoic and some internal echogenicity may be seen. It is wider than tall and posterior acoustic enhancement is NOT seen, helping distinguish from a cyst or other fluid collection. B) An arrow indicates the adenoma.

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. A) This is the same abscess seen in the above image and is imaged with a curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of the abscess. It is important to image the abscess completely for width and depth. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the ribs and posterior acoustic enhancement are noted.

Purulent breast abscess. A) A purulent breast abscess is seen. The fluid is echogenic, but can be recognized as a disruption of the surrounding tissue and posterior acoustic enhancement. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the posterior acoustic enhancement is noted.

Complex breast abscess. In this clip, the features of a loculated breast abscess containing echogenic purulent material are noted. Example of imaging with a linear high-frequency transducer.

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. In this clip, a large, loculated breast abscess and its features are noted. Example of imaging with a lower-frequency curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of this large abscess.

Loculated breast abscess. A) A large loculated abscess is seen containing hypoechoic fluid and some internal echoes. Posterior acoustic enhancement is seen. Care must be taken to image at an adequate depth to visualize posterior borders of breast lesions. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the posterior acoustic enhancement is noted.

Breast cyst. A) A simple, fairly round breast cyst with hypo or anechoic contents and well-defined borders; B) Posterior acoustic enhancement is seen as well as edge shadows (arrows).

Ultrasonogram demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with smooth, partially lobulated margins typical of a fibroadenoma.

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Mediolateral oblique digital mammogram of the right breast in a 66-year-old woman with a new, opaque, irregular mass approximately 1 cm in diameter. The mass has spiculated margins in the middle third of the right breast at the 10-o'clock position. Image demonstrates both the spiculated mass (black arrow) and separate anterior focal asymmetry (white arrow).

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Antiradial sonogram of the spiculated mass (shown in the image above) demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with angular margins (black arrows). Cursors on the margins of the mass were used to electronically measure its dimensions of the mass, which was 0.9 X 0.8 cm.

Craniocaudal mammograms obtained 1 year apart demonstrate a newly developing mass in the outer part of the breast.

Spot compression mammogram of the outer part of the breast demonstrates a new mass as smooth, margined, and oval. The findings are consistent with a fibroadenoma, a cyst, or a malignancy. In this patient, the diagnosis was a rapidly growing fibroadenoma.

Eggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have walls thinner than those of lucent-centered calcifications.

This mass with associated large, coarse calcifications (arrows) is a degenerating fibroadenoma.

Complex breast abscess. In this clip, the features of a loculated breast abscess containing echogenic purulent material are noted. Example of imaging with a linear high-frequency transducer.

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. In this clip, a large, loculated breast abscess and its features are noted. Example of imaging with a lower-frequency curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of this large abscess.

Ultrasonogram demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with smooth, partially lobulated margins typical of a fibroadenoma.

Craniocaudal mammograms obtained 1 year apart demonstrate a newly developing mass in the outer part of the breast.

Spot compression mammogram of the outer part of the breast demonstrates a new mass as smooth, margined, and oval. The findings are consistent with a fibroadenoma, a cyst, or a malignancy. In this patient, the diagnosis was a rapidly growing fibroadenoma.

Eggshell or rim calcifications (arrows) have walls thinner than those of lucent-centered calcifications.

This mass with associated large, coarse calcifications (arrows) is a degenerating fibroadenoma.

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Mediolateral oblique digital mammogram of the right breast in a 66-year-old woman with a new, opaque, irregular mass approximately 1 cm in diameter. The mass has spiculated margins in the middle third of the right breast at the 10-o'clock position. Image demonstrates both the spiculated mass (black arrow) and separate anterior focal asymmetry (white arrow).

Breast cancer, ultrasonography. Antiradial sonogram of the spiculated mass (shown in the image above) demonstrates a hypoechoic mass with angular margins (black arrows). Cursors on the margins of the mass were used to electronically measure its dimensions of the mass, which was 0.9 X 0.8 cm.

Breast cyst. A) A simple, fairly round breast cyst with hypo or anechoic contents and well-defined borders; B) Posterior acoustic enhancement is seen as well as edge shadows (arrows).

Breast adenoma. A) A breast adenoma is oval with well-defined borders. It may be hypoechoic and some internal echogenicity may be seen. It is wider than tall and posterior acoustic enhancement is NOT seen, helping distinguish from a cyst or other fluid collection. B) An arrow indicates the adenoma.

Breast hematoma. A) A breast hematoma is seen as a round echogenic collection with surrounding tissue edema. A hematoma may be hypoechoic, mixed, or fairly echogenic depending on the stage of the hematoma. B) The hematoma is outlined and tissue edema noted.

Loculated breast abscess. A) A large loculated abscess is seen containing hypoechoic fluid and some internal echoes. Posterior acoustic enhancement is seen. Care must be taken to image at an adequate depth to visualize posterior borders of breast lesions. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the posterior acoustic enhancement is noted.

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. A) This is the same abscess seen in the above image and is imaged with a curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of the abscess. It is important to image the abscess completely for width and depth. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the ribs and posterior acoustic enhancement are noted.

Purulent breast abscess. A) A purulent breast abscess is seen. The fluid is echogenic, but can be recognized as a disruption of the surrounding tissue and posterior acoustic enhancement. B) The abscess is outlined in yellow and the posterior acoustic enhancement is noted.

Complex breast abscess. In this clip, the features of a loculated breast abscess containing echogenic purulent material are noted. Example of imaging with a linear high-frequency transducer.

Loculated breast abscess, curvilinear. In this clip, a large, loculated breast abscess and its features are noted. Example of imaging with a lower-frequency curvilinear transducer to better appreciate the extent of this large abscess.