Barbiturate Toxicity

Back

Practice Essentials

Although barbiturates have largely been replaced, both medically and recreationally, by benzodiazepines, barbiturate toxicity still occurs. Clinicians need to be aware not only of the effects of barbiturates alone, but of compound drugs that include barbiturates and barbiturates taken together with alcohol or other synergistic sedatives (see Presentation).

In general, sedative-hypnotic drugs are nonselective in their effects. At lower doses, a reduction in restlessness and emotional tension occurs. At increasingly higher doses, sedation is followed by increasing levels of anesthesia and eventually death.

Toxicity within the barbiturate drug class varies depending on the onset and duration of the agent. For instance, patients with significant poisoning by short-acting barbiturates recover quickly (within 24-48h) in a setting devoid of complications, as opposed to those poisoned with longer-acting agents, such as phenobarbital, which requires more aggressive interventions such as ventilatory support and admission to the ICU.

Treatment for poisoning remains supportive as there is no specific antidote (see Treatment and Medication).

For patient education resources, see Barbiturate Misuse.

Background

Barbiturates are the earliest class of sedative-hypnotic agents to be developed. They were first used in medicine in the early 1900s and remained widely prescribed prior to the development of the less toxic hypnosedative drug class known as benzodiazepines. Their popularity peaked in the 1960s and 1970s for treatment of insomnia, anxiety, and seizures. Also known by street names such as, “reds”, “downers”, “barbs”, “yellow jackets”, “blue heavens”, and “nenbies”, barbiturates’ owe their various effects to a combination of a pyrimidinetrione ring structure and the overall size and structure of the C-5 position substituents.

Barbiturates once enjoyed a central place in the world of recreational drugs at the beginning of the 20th century and were used for a wide range of conditions until their liability for abuse led to an extensive number of barbiturate poisoning cases in the 1950s and 1960s. As late as the turn of the 21st century, barbiturates were commonly used in geriatric suicide involving medication overdose; in a New York City study, 27.2% of fatal overdose suicide cases in elderly persons were due to barbiturates.[1]

Interestingly, as abuse of phenobarbital waned, reported cases of poisoning and abuse from other sedative-hypnotic drugs, such as propofol, ketamine, and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), steadily increased. The effects that limit the clinical use of these drugs make them appealing to recreational drug users. In a 2007 study, 18% of academic anesthesiology departments surveyed had reported a case of propofol abuse or diversion in the previous 10 years, a 5-fold increase from prior studies; almost all the deaths were in anesthesiology residents.[2]

Despite the decline in barbiturate use, cases of acute poisoning with severe toxicity are still noted at staggering rates in developing countries, where resource limitations and the affordability of barbiturates lend to their increased use as anticonvulsants.

Benzodiazepines have largely replaced barbiturates both medically and recreationally due to their wider therapeutic window, lower drug tolerance, and lower propensity for abuse. Although tolerance to the sedative-hypnotic effects does occur, no tolerance appears to develop to the level at which lethal toxicity occurs. Stricter guidelines dictating barbiturate use have also contributed to its decreased availability.

Procedural sedation and analgesia are essential to ameliorating painful procedures for both adults and children in the emergency department. The favorable pharmacokinetics and adverse effect profile of propofol allows it to be used clinically for procedural sedation. However, propofol contains a relatively narrow therapeutic window and is associated with a dose-dependent risk of bradypnea and hypotension, especially in elderly persons.

Although in clinical practice, barbiturate use has been largely replaced by benzodiazepines and propofol, there are two distinct scenarios in which their use may still be warranted: status epilepticus and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP).

Given that status epilepticus is the second most frequent neurologic emergency and that refractory status epilepticus (RSE) carries a 25% mortality rate, studies indicate that barbiturates still may have a role in this scenario.[3, 4]  Supporting this, toxicologic or withdrawal seizures seem to be more amendable to GABA receptor activation, compared with idiopathic or traumatic seizures, which usually start with a focus of isolated abnormal neurons and are more amendable to blockade of voltage-dependent sodium channels.[5]

In a meta-analysis of the use of barbiturates, propofol, or midazolam in RSE there was no difference in short-term mortality, although immediate effectiveness favored barbiturates.[3]  In addition, pentobarbital’s activity at the GABA receptor is less dependent on the presence of adequate normal quantities of GABA, a theoretical benefit in treating of seizures induced by toxins that deplete GABA. Propofol has the advantage of a short half-life which allows for rapid weaning; however, the risks of propofol infusion syndrome needs to be monitored. This has to be weighed against barbiturates' long elimination time secondary to their lipophilic nature and high adipose storage (thiopental has a 36-hour elimination half life after continuous infusion).[3]

Although guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) recommend that high-dose barbiturate therapy may be considered to lower ICP,[6]  the evidence for decreasing morbidity and mortality is lacking. In one study, high-dose barbiturate treatment caused a decrease in ICP in 69% of patients but also caused longer periods of a decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) despite increased use of high-dose vasopressors. There was no significant effect on outcome.[7]  Overall, there is no evidence that barbiturate therapy in patients with TBI improves outcome.[7] This probably is from the fact that cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) remains unchanged, as any benefit in decreasing ICP is offset by a decrease in MAP (CPP=MAP-ICP).

Pathophysiology

Barbiturates bind to specific sites on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–sensitive ion channels found in the central nervous system (CNS), where they allow an influx of chloride into cell membranes and, subsequently, hyperpolarize the postsynaptic neuron. Although the clinical effects of barbiturates and benzodiazepines are similar and result from hyperpolarization of the neuron, there are subtle differences in terms of receptor binding. Barbiturates increase the duration of Cl ion channel opening at the GABA receptor, which, in turn, increases the efficacy of GABA. Benzodiazepines, on the other hand, increase the frequency of Cl ion channel openings at the GABA receptor, which, in turn, increases the potency of GABA.[8]

GABA and glycine are the major inhibitory neurotransmitters in the CNS. Barbiturates enhance GABA-mediated chloride currents by binding to the GABA. A receptor-ionophore complex at the beta subunit is distinct from the GABA and benzodiazepine binding site and increases the duration of ionophore opening. This potentiates and prolongs the inhibitory actions of GABA. At high doses, barbiturates stimulate GABA A receptors directly in the absence of GABA. Barbiturates also block glutamate (principle excitatory neurotransmitter) receptors (AMPA) in the CNS.

Barbiturates may be grouped functionally into long- and short-acting agents (consisting of ultrashort-, short-, and intermediate-acting agents). However, the relevance of this classification system in terms of prognosis remains to be well defined as the agents’ duration of action is only partially correlated with half-life (the remaining differences are accounted for with tissue binding and distribution).[9] All of the drugs in this class are derivatives of barbituric acid, which was the original compound developed in 1864. However, the structure of each barbiturate differs and can be related to its effective duration of action.

Compared with long-acting agents, short-acting agents are more lipid soluble, more protein bound, have a higher pKa, a more rapid onset, shorter duration of action, and are metabolized almost entirely in the liver to inactive metabolites (which are excreted as glucuronides in the urine). Long-acting agents are less lipid soluble, accumulate more slowly in tissue, and are excreted more readily by the kidney as active drug. For instance, urinary excretion accounts for 20-30% of phenobarbital and 15-42% of primidone elimination (both long-acting agents). Specifically, the duration of action depends mainly on the alkyl groups attached to carbon #5. The structure of these alkyl groups determine lipid solubility of the drug in that the duration of action decreases as the total number of carbons at carbon #5 increases.

Chemical compounds of barbiturates

See image below.



View Image

Chemical compounds of barbiturates.

Short-acting agents have an elimination half-life of less than 40 hours compared with long-acting agents, which have an elimination half-life of longer than 40 hours.

Central nervous system effects

Barbiturates mainly act in the CNS, though they may indirectly affect other organ systems. Direct effects include sedation and hypnosis at lower dosages. The CNS depressant effect mimics that of ethanol. The lipophilic barbiturates, such as thiopental, cause rapid anesthesia because of their tendency to penetrate brain tissue quickly. Elderly people have proportionally more adipose tissue and therefore are more susceptible to this narrow therapeutic index. Barbiturates all have anticonvulsant activity because they hyperpolarize cell membranes. Therefore, they are effective adjuncts in the treatment of epilepsy.

The high doses of barbiturates used in the care of neurocritical patients have in recent years been reported to possibly lead to the accumulation of propylene glycol. Propylene glycol is a commonly used vehicle in the intravenous formulations of many medications, including phenobarbital and pentobarbital. Increased levels of propylene glycol may yield a less recognized complication of therapy, as propylene glycol may exacerbate existing complications associated with large doses of barbiturates, to include hypotension and respiratory depression. In addition, propylene glycol toxicity, ironically, may induce seizures that the barbiturates are intended to treat.[10]

Pulmonary effects

Barbiturates can cause a depression of the medullary respiratory center and induce a respiratory depression. Patients with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more susceptible to these effects, even at doses that would be considered therapeutic in healthy individuals. Fatality from barbiturate overdose is usually secondary to respiratory depression and subsequent pneumonia and one must respect its narrow therapeutic index as even a slight overdose can cause coma or death.

Cardiovascular effects

Cardiovascular depression may occur following depression of the medullary vasomotor centers; patients with underlying congestive heart failure (CHF) are more susceptible to these effects. At higher doses, cardiac contractility and vascular tone are compromised, which may cause cardiovascular collapse. The combination of the decreased vascular resistance by means of peripheral dilation and inherent negative ionotropic properties of barbiturates yields to the development of another recognized complication, hypotension.

Propofol

Although technically not a barbiturate, the barbiturate-like sedative propofol deserves special mention. It is an ultra–short-acting agent usually used for general anesthesia, procedural sedation, or reduction of intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Propofol binds to GABA A receptors directly and inhibits calcium flow through slow calcium ion channels.[11] Both barbiturates and propofol also interact with N -methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA)/kainite receptors.

Propofol is highly lipid soluble with an onset of less than 1 minute and a quick offset of action. It is barbiturate-like in its activity at the GABA receptor, its pharmacologic effects (respiratory depression and hypotension), and its lipophilic nature. However, its chemical structure is not analogous. Because of its short half-life of 3 minutes, it must be used in an intravenous infusion for long sedation. Additionally, its side effects, particularly respiratory depression, are compounded by benzodiazepines, opioids, and ethanol.

Propofol has specific pharmacokinetics that make it attractive for use in ED procedures. Notably, its rapid onset and short duration of action make it an excellent choice for this purpose. Miner et al compared the efficacy and safety of propofol and etomidate for ED procedures.[12] The success rate was 10% higher in the group given propofol, as 20% of the etomidate group experienced myoclonus. No significant increase in clinical respiratory depression or hypotension occurred in either arm of the study.

Ketamine

Another agent widely used for procedural sedation, and increasingly as a drug of abuse, is ketamine. Ketamine acts primarily on the NMDA receptor by noncompetitive antagonism that decreases the effect of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate as it is a derivative of PCP. It also binds to opioid receptors. At low doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg/h), ketamine induces distortion of time and space, hallucinations, and mild dissociative effects. At larger doses, it induces a more severe dissociation wherein users experience intense detachment, such that their perceptions are completely disconnected from reality.[13] Ketamine causes a sympatheticlike response by inducing bronchodilatation and increasing heart rate and blood pressure. Increased salivation and minimal transient respiratory depression followed by respiratory stimulation may also occur.

GHB interacts with GHB-specific receptors and GABA B receptors. GHB also affects dopamine, opioid, serotonin, acetylcholine, and glutamate neurotransmitter systems. Additional GABA-like effects occur at high doses through the conversion of GHB to GABA. When consumed in oral doses as low as 25 mg/kg, confusion, sedation, respiratory depression, and dizziness have been shown to result. At higher dosages of 50-63 mg/kg, loss of consciousness and profound coma has been documented.[14] Barbiturates stimulate the hepatic cytochrome P-450 mixed function oxidase microsomal enzyme system. Thus, barbiturates affect the drug levels of medications that are dependent on this system and typically increase their metabolism (eg, warfarin [Coumadin]). Note that barbiturates themselves are metabolized by this system, which may partially explain the drug tolerance often observed in long-term users.

Phenibut

While its name is similar to phenobarbital, phenibut (4-amino-3-phenyl-butyric acid) not a barbiturate. Phenibut is a GABA receptor agonist created in the former Soviet Union for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia and alcohol withdrawal with a similar profile to gabapentin and benzodiazepines. It is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but its use is growing in popularity and is readily available online where it is marketed as a nootropic dietary supplement.[15, 16, 17]

Phenibut's mechanism of action is mainly as a GABA-B receptor agonist and to a lesser extent, GABA-A agonist activity.  Symptoms of intoxication including delirium, somnolence, psychosis, and movement disorders.[17]  Withdrawal can occur quickly (within 2 hours after last dose), at low doses (2-3g daily) or after a short duration of use (7 days). Symptoms of withdrawal include anxiety, irritability or agitation, insomnia, and psychosis.[15]

Epidemiology

Barbiturate abuse was popular in the 1960s and 1970s. Since then, its popularity has waned because of stricter guidelines for use and the introduction of benzodiazepines, which inherently have lower cardiorespiratory toxicity. These two factors have decreased barbiturate availability significantly and have led to less abuse. More recently, however, a gradual increase in barbiturate abuse has been observed among high school seniors. Street names for phenobarbital include "purple hearts" and "golfballs", while pentobarbital is called "nembies", "yellow jackets", "abbots", or "Mexican yellows".

In 2023, a total of 618 single-substance exposures to barbiturates were reported to US poison control centers. Of those, 23 resulted in major toxicity and 3 deaths were reported. The majority of reported exposures (71%) were in adults; children under the age of 6 years accounted for 14% of exposures. In addition, 113 single exposures to primidone were reported, with 2 major outcomes and no deaths.[18]

Prognosis

With early supportive care, overall in-hospital mortality rates from barbiturate poisoning are less than 0.5-2%. 

Fatality associated with barbiturate overdose is rare, but complications are abundant.[18] Morbidity includes immunosuppression with frequent nosocomial infections such as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, hypoxic damage secondary to prolonged hypotension, and coma. Other complications include iatrogenic ones from forced diuresis, gastric lavage, and central venous access. Life-threatening complications may include acute renal failure, pulmonary edema, and the sequelae of hypotension and respiratory depression. Survivors may develop dermal bullae.

History

As with any overdose, it is important to attempt to ascertain the exact substance and quantity ingested, the time of ingestion and possible co-intoxicants, especially synergistic toxins such as alcohol or other sedatives. Remember that some barbiturates are included in combination drugs (eg, Fioricet [butalbital, acetaminophen]; Donnatal [phenobarbital, hyoscyamine, scopolamine, atropine]) with components that have their own toxicity profile.

Other important aspects of the history include the following:

Physical Examination

A full physical examination is warranted in any overdose. Record vital signs. The patient with barbiturate toxicity may present with any or all of the signs and symptoms listed delow.

Neurologic manifestations may include the following:

Psychiatric manifestations may include the following:

Respiratory manifestations may include the following:

Cardiovascular manifestations may include the following:

Other manifestations may include the following:

Laboratory Studies

Obtain a complete blood cell count (CBC), electrolytes, kidney function studies, and glucose screen to distinguish barbiturate toxicity from metabolic derangements that can cause similar symptoms. An arterial blood gas (ABG) measurement may help establish the presence and progress of ventilatory failure, hypoxia, and metabolic acidosis. A serum lactic acid level may assess cellular hypoperfusion.

Barbiturate plasma concentrations aid in diagnosis and help determine whether to institute methods to enhance elimination and if so, whether these methods are effective. They are not accurate for predicting the duration or severity of toxicity. Considerations are as follows:

A urine drug screen may help establish co-ingestants, though its routine use rarely alters treatment and clinical outcome. However, many clinicians routinely obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in all overdoses, which is appropriate because barbiturates/combination drugs may contain those analgesics.

Blood ethanol concentration may identify it as a co-ingestant, but as with urine drug screens its routine use rarely alters treatment and clinical outcome. However, it is important to be aware of alcohol co-ingestion, since synergism between alcohol and barbiturate toxicity may be expected.

Obtain a pregnancy test in women of childbearing age.

Imaging Studies

Imaging studies of the brain are indicated in patients with barbiturate toxicity possibly complicated by head trauma, whether suggested by the history or by signs/symptoms. Intramyelinic edema was reported in a neonate with toxicity from prescribed phenobarbital who presented with with abnormal movements, lethargy, and frequent episodes of cyclical leg movements suspected to be subtle seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed diffusion restriction in the splenium of the corpus callosum and the posterior limb of the internal capsule without T1 and T2 changes. On repeat MRI performed 10 days after stopping the drug, the intramyelinic edma had resolved.[21]

Electrocardiography

Considerations regarding electrocardiography include the following:

Prehospital Care

Ensuring adequate airway, breathing, and circulation is essential. Emergency medical personnel should do the following:

Emergency Department Care

Treatment of the patient with barbiturate toxicity is predominantly supportive. The mainstay of treatment underscores the importance of preventing hypoxemia and hypotension. Management strategies generally fall into 3 major areas: supportive care, decontamination, and enhancement of elimination.

Supportive care

Assess the airway and adequacy of respiration and perform ET intubation if necessary. If the patient has not been intubated, provide supplemental oxygen and continue to monitor the airway status. Obtain intravenous access and an initial pulse oximeter reading, and place the patient on a cardiac monitor. Measure blood glucose, and administer naloxone 2 mg IV to all patients with altered mental status.

Obtain a rectal temperature to check for hypothermia. If the patient is hypothermic, immediately initiate a careful rewarming (to avoid precipitating a fall in blood pressure).

Aggressively initiate fluid therapy if the patient has a low blood pressure or appears to be in hypovolemic shock.

Initiate treatment with pressors (eg, norepinephrine) if shock persists or worsens. In general, initiate pressors after aggressive and adequate fluid resuscitation has been attempted and the patient is determined to be euvolemic.

Gastrointestinal decontamination

Despite the fact that barbiturates are well adsorbed by activated charcoal and a study in which volunteers given 50 g of activated charcoal showed a mean reduction in absorption of 47.3%, 40.07%, and 16.5% when it was administered at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes, respectively, current guidelines in overdose management question its benefit. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Indeed, a 2005 study found that its use had decreased to less than 5% of all reported ingestions in recent years.[22]

A single dose of activated charcoal may be given within an hour of overdose if the clinician estimates that a clinically significant fraction of the ingested substance remains in the GI tract, the toxin is adsorbed by charcoal, further absorption may result in clinical deterioration, and the patient has no depression of his or her mental status. Activated charcoal is a hydrocarbon with a high aspiration ratio; hence, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated in any patient who does not have an intact or protected airway.

Of note, giving this noninnocuous substance to any patient with any ingestion must be weighed against the fact that general supportive care and the use of a few specific antidotes has decreased the mortality rate in unselected overdose patients to less than 1% if the patient arrives at the hospital in time for the clinician to intervene.[22]

Although multiple doses of activated charcoal (MDAC) have been shown to enhance elimination of phenobarbital and to reduce the serum half-life, a definite improvement in clinical outcome has not been shown in any studies using MDAC.

Induction of emesis with ipecac syrup is now largely of historic interest only. In any case, it would be contraindicated in these patients because their depressed neurologic response increases the risk of aspiration.

Enhancement of elimination

The goal of enhanced elimination is to decrease the duration of ventilatory support, mitigate hypotension, and decrease morbidity/mortality. Since barbiturates are weak acids, enhanced renal elimination occurs through alkalinization of the urine. The presence of more protons and less additional substituents on the C-5 position decreases the pKa, thus increasing the acidity of the barbiturate structure. In this way, phenobarbital and likely other long-acting barbiturates, can be converted to water-soluble salts with the appropriate base and eliminated through ion trapping by decreasing tubular reabsorption, analogous to that of salicylate poisoning treatment.

Enhanced urinary elimination has been well established as a treatment for phenobarbital and butalbital. Phenobarbital's low pKa (4.2), higher water solubility, and slow hepatic metabolism with a subsequently long half-life allow a larger proportion of drug to be excreted by the kidneys. Urinary alkalinization is not recommended for short-acting barbiturates.

Enhancement of urinary elimination may be accomplished with an initial sodium bicarbonate bolus of 1 mEq/kg followed by a constant infusion. This infusion may be made by adding 100-150 mEq of sodium bicarbonate to 850 mL of D5 and titrating to maintain a urine pH of greater than 7.5 with an arterial pH of less than 7.50. The goal should be a urine output of 150-250 mL/h.

Risks include hypokalemia, fluid overload, tetany, and the possibility of excessive elevations in arterial pH.

Extracorporeal elimination is rarely advised. Even though plasma clearance and elimination half-life has been shown to be decreased up to 30%, no controlled studies demonstrating a patient benefit are available.[9] Current literature suggests hemoperfusion is marginally preferable to hemodialysis in terms of absolute clearance rates (clearance decreases when the duration of treatment exceeds 2-3 h). Because the majority of patients do well with supportive care alone and blood levels do not correlate with duration of coma/ventilatory time, routine extracorporeal drug removal is not recommended. An argument can be made for this procedure in a patient who remains unstable despite aggressive supportive care, especially in a patient with rising drug blood levels.

While there remains no specific antidote for barbiturate toxicity, numerous publications have outlined the possible clinical use of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) as an antidote. The suggested mechanism of ILE in lipophilic drug toxidrome is the formation of a lipid sink that acts to sequester lipophilic toxins (such as local anesthetics), thereby decreasing the targeted drug concentration and toxicity.[23] However, although ILE continues to be a therapy of interest, its role at this time is limited. A review of approximately 42 case reports with ILE use showed a possible benefit. It has been used in patients with negative hemodynamics whose condition remains unresponsive to conventional supportive therapy.

Inpatient Care

Patients with barbiturate toxicity generally need to be monitored closely and should be in an ICU setting.

Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion enhance elimination of barbiturates (the brenefit of this is best established with phenobarbital). Hemoperfusion is more efficacious than hemodialysis but is associated with a higher incidence of complications. Hemodialysis or hemoperfusion may be of benefit for patients whose condition is resistant to standard supportive care, in stage IV coma, or with shock, severe hypothermia, kidney failure, and pulmonary edema. Some authors recommend extracorporeal removal to shorten the duration of coma when patients are apneic or have serum concentrations of barbiturate > 100 mg/L.

Barbiturate withdrawal is very similar to ethanol withdrawal. Specifically, one may see a reduction in intoxication and an apparent improvement in condition. This may be quickly followed by anxiety, weakness, tremors, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps. In chronic, heavy users, 1.5-5 days after the last dose the patient may develop seizures, and, between 3 and 7 days after the last dose, delirium tremens may occur. Like ethanol withdrawal, barbiturate withdrawal may be refractory to standard-dose benzodiazepine therapy, though these medications are first-line therapy.

Consultations

Consider consulting a toxicology service if available. Patients requiring admission are generally admitted to the ICU after consultation with an intensivist. If a patient is considered for hemodialysis or hemoperfusion, a nephrologist should be consulted.

Medication Summary

Gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal and alkalinization of the urine with sodium bicarbonate may be beneficial in patient management. Also, pharmacologic support with pressor agents may be required in hypotensive patients.

Activated charcoal (Actidose-Aqua, Charcoal (activated), CharcoalAid)

Clinical Context:  Prevents absorption by adsorbing drug in the intestine. Multidose charcoal may interrupt enterohepatic recirculation and enhance elimination by enterocapillary exsorption. Theoretically, by constantly bathing the GI tract with charcoal, the intestinal lumen serves as a dialysis membrane for reverse-absorption of drug from intestinal villous capillary blood back into the intestine.

Supplied as an aqueous mixture or in combination with a cathartic (usually sorbitol 70%).

Sodium bicarbonate

Clinical Context:  Goal is to maintain a urinary pH >7.5 and urine output >2 mL/kg/h. Monitor arterial or venous pH; a blood pH >7.55 may increase patient morbidity. This therapy is specific to long-acting barbiturates given their lower pKa, with ion trapping being the intended mechanism.

Norepinephrine (Levarterenol, Levophed)

Clinical Context:  Stimulates beta1-adrenergic and alpha-adrenergic receptors, which, in turn, increases cardiac muscle contractility, heart rate, and vasoconstriction. As a result, systemic blood pressure and coronary blood flow increase.

Author

Keith A Lafferty, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine; Medical Student Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Gulf Coast Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Keisha Bonhomme, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, St Vincent’s Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Piotr Kopinski, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Michael J Burns, MD, Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard University Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael A Miller, MD, Clinical Professor of Emergency Medicine, Medical Toxicologist, Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas A&M Health Sciences Center; CHRISTUS Spohn Emergency Medicine Residency Program

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

David C Lee, MD, Research Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Associate Professor, North Shore University Hospital and New York University Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rehab Abdel-Kariem, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Abrams RC, Leon AC, Tardiff K, Marzuk PM, Santos Rde L. Suicidal overdoses of psychotropic drugs by elderly in New York City: comparison with younger adults. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 15. 188 (3):459-61. [View Abstract]
  2. Wischmeyer PE, Johnson BR, Wilson JE, et al. A survey of propofol abuse in academic anesthesia programs. Anesth Analg. 2007 Oct. 105(4):1066-71, table of contents. [View Abstract]
  3. Rossetti AO, Lowenstein DH. Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Oct. 10(10):922-30. [View Abstract]
  4. Cock HR. Drug-induced status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug. 49:76-82. [View Abstract]
  5. Sharma AN, Hoffman RJ. Toxin-related seizures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011 Feb. 29(1):125-39. [View Abstract]
  6. [Guideline] Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1. 80 (1):6-15. [View Abstract]
  7. Majdan M, Mauritz W, Wilbacher I, Brazinova A, Rusnak M, Leitgeb J. Barbiturates use and its effects in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in five European countries. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 1. 30(1):23-9. [View Abstract]
  8. Sharma AN, Hoffman RJ. Toxin-related seizures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011 Feb. 29(1):125-39. [View Abstract]
  9. Roberts DM, Buckley NA. Enhanced elimination in acute barbiturate poisoning - a systematic review. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011 Jan. 49(1):2-12. [View Abstract]
  10. Bledsoe KA, Kramer AH. Propylene glycol toxicity complicating use of barbiturate coma. Neurocrit Care. 2008. 9(1):122-4. [View Abstract]
  11. Ng SH, Tse ML, Ng HW, Lau FL. Emergency department presentation of ketamine abusers in Hong Kong: a review of 233 cases. Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Feb. 16(1):6-11. [View Abstract]
  12. Miner JR, Danahy M, Moch A, Biros M. Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan. 49(1):15-22. [View Abstract]
  13. Morgan CJ, Curran HV. Ketamine use: a review. Addiction. 2012 Jan. 107(1):27-38. [View Abstract]
  14. Zvosec DL, Smith SW, Porrata T, Strobl AQ, Dyer JE. Case series of 226 gamma-hydroxybutyrate-associated deaths: lethal toxicity and trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar. 29(3):319-32. [View Abstract]
  15. Feldman R, Autry B, Dukes J, Lofy T, Marchetti G, Patt A, et al. A systematic review of phenibut withdrawal focusing on complications, therapeutic approaches, and single substance versus polysubstance withdrawal. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2023 Nov. 61 (11):941-951. [View Abstract]
  16. Martin R, Buffenstein I, Cho D, Kiyokawa M. Toxidrome of an Easily Obtainable Nootropic: A Case Report of Phenibut Intoxication and Withdrawal Delirium. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Nov-Dec 01. 43 (6):507-510. [View Abstract]
  17. Weleff J, Kovacevich A, Burson J, Nero N, Anand A. Clinical Presentations and Treatment of Phenibut Toxicity and Withdrawal: A Systematic Literature Review. J Addict Med. 2023 Jul-Aug 01. 17 (4):407-417. [View Abstract]
  18. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Rivers LJ, Feldman R, et al. 2023 Annual Report of the National Poison Data System® (NPDS) from America's Poison Centers®: 41st Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2024 Dec. 62 (12):793-1027. [View Abstract]
  19. Cohen PA, Ellison RR, Travis JC, Gaufberg SV, Gerona R. Quantity of phenibut in dietary supplements before and after FDA warnings. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Apr. 60 (4):486-488. [View Abstract]
  20. Feldman R, Autry B, Dukes J, Lofy T, Marchetti G, Patt A, et al. A systematic review of phenibut withdrawal focusing on complications, therapeutic approaches, and single substance versus polysubstance withdrawal. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2023 Nov. 61 (11):941-951. [View Abstract]
  21. Garg M, Jain V. Phenobarbital Toxicity in a Neonate Presenting with Intramyelinic Edema. Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Apr. 90 (4):418. [View Abstract]
  22. Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005. 43(2):61-87. [View Abstract]
  23. Cave G, Harvey M, Graudins A. Intravenous lipid emulsion as antidote: a summary of published human experience. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Apr. 23(2):123-41. [View Abstract]

Chemical compounds of barbiturates.

Chemical compounds of barbiturates.