Pediatric Constipation

Back

Background

Concern about bowel function has been prevalent throughout history across many cultures. A normal bowel pattern is thought to be a sign of good health. Unfortunately, no uniform definition of childhood constipation is recognized. Moreover, healthcare providers have definitions of constipation that are very different from most parents' definitions.

Constipation in children has reported prevalence rates between 1% and 30%.[1] It is the principal complaint in 3-5% of all visits to pediatric outpatient clinics and as many as 35% of all visits to pediatric gastroenterologists.[2]

Definitions

For practical clinical purposes, constipation is generally defined as infrequent defecation, painful defecation, or both. In most cases, parents are worried that their child's stools are too large, too hard, not frequent enough, and/or painful to pass.

The North American Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) defines constipation as "a delay or difficulty in defecation, present for 2 weeks or more, and sufficient to cause significant distress to the patient."[3]

The Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) defines constipation as "a period of 8 weeks with at least 2 of the following symptoms: defecation frequency less than 3 times per week, fecal incontinence frequency greater than once per week, passage of large stools that clog the toilet, palpable abdominal or rectal fecal mass, stool withholding behavior, or painful defecation."[4]

The following image is an abdominal radiograph of a child with constipation.



View Image

Plain abdominal radiograph that demonstrates stool throughout the colon.

See also Constipation and Surgery for Pediatric Constipation and Bowel Management.

Anatomy

Bowel motility is one of the most complex and sophisticated functions in the human body. The colon absorbs water and functions as a reservoir. Liquid waste delivered by the small bowel into the cecum becomes solid stool in the descending and sigmoid colon. The colon has a slow motility; its peristalsis seems to be less active in the distal portions of the colon. Every 24-48 hours, the rectosigmoid develops active peristaltic waves that indicate that it must be emptied. This is perceived by the individual, who then has the capacity to voluntarily retain the stool or to empty it, depending on social circumstances.

Pathophysiology

Most children suffering from constipation have no underlying medical condition. They are often labeled as having functional constipation or acquired megacolon. In most cases, childhood constipation develops when the child begins to associate pain with defecation. Once pain is associated with the passage of bowel movements, the child begins to withhold stools in an attempt to avoid discomfort. As stool withholding continues, the rectum gradually accommodates, and the normal urge to defecate gradually disappears. The infrequent passage of very large and hard stools reinforces the child's association of pain with defecation, resulting in worsening stool retention and progressively more abnormal defecation dynamics with anal sphincter spasm. Chronic rectal distention ultimately results in both loss of rectal sensitivity, and loss of the urge to defecate, which can lead to fecal incontinence (ie, encopresis).

Epidemiology

In the United States, constipation is extremely common among infants and young children. In a 1987 report, Issenman et al found that 16% of parents reported that their 2-year-old children had constipation[5] ; 2 decades later, Loening-Baucke reported that the prevalence of constipation was 22.6% among 482 children aged 4-17 years.[6] In a longitudinal study of children aged 9-11 years, Saps et al reported an 18% overall prevalence of constipation.[7]

In a European study, Yong and Beattie found that 34% of parents in the United Kingdom reported their children aged 4-7 years had at least intermittent difficulties with constipation,[8] and a South American study by de Araujo Sant'Anna and Calcado found that 28% of Brazilian children aged 8-10 years were constipated.[9]

Constipation occurs in all pediatric age groups from infancy to young adulthood. Typically, childhood constipation develops during 3 stages of childhood: in infants during weaning, in toddlers during toilet training, and in school-aged children. In several published reports, approximately half of childhood constipation occurs during the first year of life.

Before puberty, constipation appears to be equally common among girls and boys. After puberty and into young adulthood, females are more likely to develop constipation than males.

Patient Education

It is very important to educate the family that using laxatives continuously for months may be necessary. This is particularly true in toddlers, because many months may pass before their association between the fear of pain and defecation is extinguished.

Caregivers should be reassured as to the safety of long-term laxative use, and the importance of persistent treatment should be strongly reinforced. Address the common misconceptions about laxative dependency and the increased risk of colon cancer due to long-term laxative usage.

Inform the family that relapses are common and are often associated with changes in the child's daily routine (eg, vacations) or during times of stress. Also, inform the family that the requirement of intermittent therapy with laxatives into adulthood is not unusual.

For patient education information, see Esophagus, Stomach, and Intestine Center as well as Constipation in Children.

History

History is often helpful in discriminating functional constipation from Hirschsprung disease (see Differentials). Asking parents when their child passed his or her first bowel movement after birth is particularly important. Most children with Hirschsprung disease have difficulties with constipation dating to birth or shortly after birth. In most published series, more than one half of infants with Hirschsprung disease do not pass meconium during the first 36 hours of life and are diagnosed with constipation within the first 4-6 months of life.

Asking the family about specific symptoms of their child's constipation is also important. Inquiring about the onset and duration of symptoms, whether the passage of bowel movements appears to be painful, and whether any bleeding has been associated with defecation is important.

Asking about a history of fecal incontinence or soiling is also important as many parents confuse fecal soiling (ie, encopresis) with poor hygiene or chronic or recurrent diarrhea.

Most cases of chronic childhood constipation are precipitated by painful bowel movements with resultant voluntary withholding of stool.[10] In young children, parents often confuse withholding of stool with pain or excessive straining. In many cases of functional constipation, parents can identify a precipitating event. Common withholding behaviors are detailed in the image below.



View Image

This image delineates common withholding behaviors in young children.

In young infants, functional constipation often develops at the time of a dietary transition (eg, from breast milk to formula, the addition of solid foods into the diet, from formula to whole milk).

In toddlers, functional constipation often develops near the time of toilet training. In toddlers and young children, constipation may develop following an illness associated with either a severe diaper dermatitis or dehydration.

In older children, functional constipation often develops at the time of school entry, because they refuse to defecate while they are at school.

Physical Examination

The most important part of the physical examination is the rectal examination. Perform a rectal examination in any child with chronic constipation, regardless of age, to exclude underlying anatomic abnormalities that might account for the constipation, such as an imperforate anus with perineal fistula, intestinal obstruction (mass effect), or Hirschsprung disease. In young infants, the anus should be sufficiently large to permit the introduction of a pinkie finger.

Upon digital examination, note the size of the anal canal, the size of the rectum, and whether any intrarectal masses are present. Also, note if the rectum is empty or filled with stool and note the consistency of the stool.

Among children with Hirschsprung disease, the rectum is typically quite small and empty of stool. Following the digital examination, the infant may have a gush of liquid stool, because the functional obstruction has transiently been relieved.

Among children with functional constipation, the rectum is generally enlarged, and stool is present just beyond the anal verge.

Sacral dimples or pits

Carefully examine the perineum for any sacral dimples or pits that might indicate an abnormality of the distal spinal cord. Also note the location of the anus on the perineum. In most children, the anus is approximately halfway between the posterior fourchette (base of the scrotum in boys; where the labia minora meet in girls) and the tip of the coccyx.

Whether children with anterior displacement of the anus are at increased risk for constipation is not entirely clear. To date, no large prospective studies have been performed. In some cases, if the anus is sufficiently anterior, a posterior rectal shelf may develop, resulting in abnormal defecation dynamics. Some pediatric surgeons and pediatric gastroenterologists believe that this entity is at one end of the continuum of imperforate anus with a perineal fistula.

Anal fissures, fistulae, or hemorrhoids and anal wink reflex

Examine the anus for the presence of any fissures, fistulae, or hemorrhoids. Also, confirm the presence of an anal wink. To elicit an anal wink, stroke the perianal skin with a pin or probe. In response to the stroking, the subcutaneous portion of the external anal sphincter should contract and visibly pucker at the anal margin. Failure to elicit this reflex can indicate an abnormality with either peripheral sensory or motor nerves or central connections mediating the reflex.

Approach Considerations

Constipation is recognized and diagnosed by most practitioners based on the child's clinical presentation (eg, a patient has difficulty passing stool or has not passed stool in 1-3 days). Laboratory studies are generally unnecessary unless an underlying condition is suspected to be the cause, in which case diagnostic tests should be obtained as appropriate.

Abdominal Radiography

In most cases, the most useful radiologic study for the evaluation of patients with bowel problems is plain abdominal radiography (see the following image). This helps the clinician determine how much stool is present in the colon. Overflow diarrhea is suggested if the child has a history of diarrhea and there is large fecal burden on the radiograph. An abdominal radiograph can also be useful in assessing the colonic fecal burden among children who are obese or who refuse a rectal examination. It can also be helpful in assessing the efficacy of medical therapy when the child's history is unclear.

Due to the high frequency of unnecessary abdominal radiographs for pediatric patients with constipation in the ED despite evidence-based guidelines that recommend against imaging,[11, 12] a study by Ferguson et decreased the rates of abdominal radiographs from 62% to 24% by the use of an interventional improvement project that included grand rounds on constipation and sharing best practices.[13, 14]



View Image

Plain abdominal radiograph that demonstrates stool throughout the colon.

Contrast Enema

Radiography can be useful in excluding or diagnosing Hirschsprung disease. Although the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease ultimately relies on histologic demonstration of an absence of ganglion cells in the affected colon, the diagnosis is often suggested by single-contrast barium enema. The radiologist is looking for a change in colonic diameter from the narrow aganglionic segment to a more dilated ganglionic segment. This transition zone is characteristic of Hirschsprung disease and is shown in the image below.



View Image

This unprepared single-contrast barium enema demonstrates a transition zone consistent with Hirschsprung disease.

The image below illustrates megasigmoid and impacted stool, and thus, slow motility.



View Image

Contrast enema of a patient with megasigmoid and impacted stool.

Avoid air-contrast enemas and rectal manipulation

Do not use an air-contrast enema when looking for Hirschsprung disease, because radiographic evaluation of Hirschsprung disease depends on finding a change in colonic caliber between the normal and abnormal aganglionic segment. With an air-contrast study, the colon is evacuated prior to the study to identify mucosal abnormalities. By evacuating the colon before the study, any caliber change may be masked.

Moreover, do not perform any form of rectal manipulation on the child (eg, rectal examination, therapeutic enema, suppository) for 48 hours before the procedure. Rectal manipulation with suppositories or therapeutic enemas may transiently dilate the narrowed distal segment, causing a false negative result.

Although an unprepared barium enema has reasonably good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in older children, this procedure is substantially less reliable during the first several months of life. The proximal colon may require several months after birth to dilate sufficiently for a transition zone to be apparent.

Anorectal Manometry

Anorectal manometry can be useful in discriminating between functional constipation and Hirschsprung disease. A balloon catheter is inserted into the rectum during this test. Normally, when the rectal balloon is inflated, the internal anal sphincter relaxes reflexively (anorectal reflex), as is shown in the image below.



View Image

The images illustrate normal anorectal manometry with relaxation of the internal anal sphincter in response to rectal distention.

Among patients with Hirschsprung disease, the internal anal sphincter fails to relax in response to rectal distention. As many as 20% of healthy children may have a falsely absent reflex, especially if they were born prematurely or with low birth weight; however, a positive response is strong evidence against Hirschsprung disease.

Rectal Biopsy

Rectal biopsy is the definitive means of establishing or excluding Hirschsprung disease.[15] This procedure is usually unnecessary when the clinical picture and the radiologic findings are characteristic of idiopathic constipation.

The tissue is examined histologically for the presence or absence of ganglion cells in the submucosal plexus. If the patient's rectum has no ganglion cells, the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease is confirmed.

Other Tests

A study by Doniger et al sought to determine the performance of point-of-care ultrasound using a sonographic numeric cutoff value for diagnosing constipation. The study found that in children with abdominal pain, there was a strong correlation of an enlarged transrectal diameter with constipation.[16]

Approach Considerations

Although constipation is an extremely common problem among children, few studies have systematically evaluated different management strategies. Childhood constipation is treated in many ways, and virtually any therapeutic regimen is likely to be effective as long as it is sufficiently aggressive and persistent.[17] Because of the medical profession's understanding of the pathophysiology of the problem, the basic tenets of therapy include evacuation of the colon, elimination of pain with defecation, and establishing regular bowel habits.[18]

A group of patients with severe constipation that does not respond to conservative medical therapy may require more aggressive treatments, including surgery. A discussion of these interventions is beyond the scope of this article. See Surgery for Pediatric Constipation and Bowel Management.

Also see Constipation.

Colon Evacuation

When there is evidence of a fecal impaction, initial therapy should be directed at evacuating the colon. A fecal impaction can be identified by palpating a hard mass of stool on physical examination, finding a large amount of stool in a dilated rectum during rectal examination, or finding excessive stool in the colon on an abdominal radiograph.

Aggressive use of oral cathartics such as polyethylene glycol, sodium phosphate, magnesium citrate, or a balanced electrolyte solution with polyethylene glycol or a series of enemas can accomplish disimpaction.[19] In trials, disimpaction by the oral route or the rectal route were reported to be equally effective.[20, 21]

Convincing a young child to ingest sufficient amounts of oral cathartics to evacuate their colon may be difficult; therefore, enemas or suppositories may be necessary. See the images below.



View Image

Position for enema administration in an infant.



View Image

Another position for enema administration.



View Image

Administration of an enema.



View Image

Incorrect enema administration. The enema is administered against stool impaction and cannot be successful.



View Image

Enema administration with a tube.



View Image

Enema with inflated Foley balloon catheter.



View Image

Administration of an enema against impacted stool.



View Image

Administration of an enema against fecal impaction.

Removal of Pain-Associated Defecation

Once the colon has been evacuated, chronic laxative therapy is generally required.[22] Virtually any laxative can be used as long as it is used in sufficient quantity to produce 1-2 soft stools daily. In young children, eliminating any pain associated with the passage of bowel movements is extremely important. Using very large doses of laxatives to produce very soft stools may be necessary.

Continuing laxative therapy for a number of months is often necessary. As a result, it is very important to reassure caregivers that long-term laxative usage is safe. Address the common misconceptions regarding laxative dependency, laxative abuse, and the risk of colon cancer due to long-term laxative usage.

If the child has anal fissures, using Xylocaine ointment or hydrocortisone suppositories for a short time period to provide symptomatic relief may be helpful.

Establishing Regular Bowel Habits

In many cases, long-term success in the management of constipation depends on the child establishing regular and routine toilet times. It is generally recommended that the child be encouraged to attend the toilet twice daily for 5-10 minutes, preferably after breakfast and after supper to take advantage of the gastrocolic reflex. For school age children, it is preferable not to expect the child to attend the toilet while at school.

When the affected child has passed bowel movements regularly for weeks or months without apparent pain, fear, or excessive straining, it is reasonable to attempt to discontinue laxative therapy. Inform the family that relapses are common, particularly with changes in the child's daily routine (eg, vacations) and during times of stress. Also inform the family that requiring intermittent therapy with laxatives into adulthood is not unusual.

Dietary Modification

Dietary changes, such as increasing the child's intake of fluids and carbohydrates, are commonly recommended as part of the treatment of constipation.[23]

Balanced diet

Complex carbohydrates and unabsorbable sugars (eg, sorbitol) are found in many fruit juices (eg, prune, pear, apple). These carbohydrates increase stool frequency by increasing fecal water content. Although randomized controlled trials have not been conducted to examine the effects of increasing the intake of fluids, nonabsorbable carbohydrates, or fiber on childhood constipation, recommending a balanced diet that includes whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and an abundance of fluids seems appropriate. Because data are limited, forceful implementation of a particular diet does not seem warranted.

Cow milk avoidance

In infants and young children, it is appropriate to consider removing cow-milk protein from the diet for a period is appropriate, because chronic constipation may be precipitated by ingestion of cow-milk proteins. Iacono and colleagues found that among 27 Italian children aged 5-36 months who had chronic constipation, the constipation resolved in 78% of the children when soy milk was substituted for cow milk; in most cases, the constipation recurred when cow milk was reintroduced.[24]

Unnecessary or ineffective dietary changes

Switching the patient to a low-iron formula is not necessary. Several studies have shown that ingestion of iron-supplemented formulas is not associated with an increased incidence of constipation.[25]

Although some evidence suggests that gastrointestinal flora is important in gut motility, no evidence suggests that gut florae are different in children with constipation than gut florae in healthy controls. While both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have been shown to increase stool frequency and decrease stool consistency in healthy adults, there is little evidence that probiotics are effective in treating constipation in either adults or children.[26, 27]  However, a study that investigated whether oral supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 during the first 3 months of life can reduce the onset of colic, gastroesophageal reflux, and constipation in term newborns reported that prophylactic use of L reuteri DSM 17938 during the first 3 months of life reduced the onset of functional gastrointestinal disorders and reduced private and public costs for the management of this condition.[28]

Consultations

Consultation with a pediatric gastroenterologist or pediatric surgeon is appropriate if the child's history or examination findings suggest an underlying organic cause (eg, Hirschsprung disease). Also seek consultation when the child fails routine therapy or when management is otherwise complex.

See Surgery for Pediatric Constipation and Bowel Management.

Long-Term Monitoring

Assessment of constipation after disimpaction assures that the prescribed therapy was effective. At that time, maintenance laxative therapy can be prescribed. When the patient has bowel movements regularly for weeks or months without apparent pain, fear, or excessive straining, attempting to discontinue laxative therapy is reasonable.

Other Treatment

A study by Sharifi-Rad et al that included 90 children reported treatment success with interferential electrical stimulation as an adjuvant therapy for functional constipation.[33]

 

Medication Summary

In several randomized trials, laxatives have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of chronic childhood constipation.[29, 30] Studies have also shown that polyethylene glycol,[31] mineral oil, magnesium hydroxide, and lactulose are effective and can be used for prolonged time periods without risk.

The key to pharmacotherapy is to use a sufficient amount of laxative to produce the desired effect. The intermittent use of stimulant laxatives may be necessary in some children; however, routine usage of these agents in young children is not generally recommended. Continuous laxative therapy may be required for a number of months until the association between pain and the passage of bowel movements has been extinguished.

Polyethylene glycol (MiraLAX, Dulcolax Balance)

Clinical Context:  Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a long chain of ethylene glycol molecules that results in an extremely large molecule. This agent is very poorly absorbed and functions as an osmotic laxative. The powders are tasteless and odorless and dissolve completely in nearly all liquids including water.

These agents often can also be used as purgatives in preparation for colonoscopy. At very large dosages, PEG is occasionally difficult to take and its usage may be associated with nausea, bloating, abdominal cramps, and vomiting.

Magnesium hydroxide (Philips' Milk of Magnesia, Fleet Pedia-Lax)

Clinical Context:  Magnesium is a divalent cation that is maximally absorbed in the distal small intestine. At low concentrations, magnesium appears to be absorbed by a saturable carrier-mediated process influenced by vitamin D. At higher concentrations, magnesium absorption appears to occur largely by diffusion and is quite inefficient. Increased serum magnesium levels may release cholecystokinin, which stimulates gastrointestinal motility and secretion; this may explain why some children experience abdominal cramping.

Magnesium is mostly flavorless but has a thick, chalky texture. It is made more palatable when mixed with a fluid (eg, milk, chocolate milk).

Lactulose (Constulose, Enulose, Generlac, Kristalose)

Clinical Context:  Lactulose is a synthetic, nonabsorbable disaccharide that is available as a 70% solution. This agent is generally very well tolerated and tastes sweet. Lactulose formulation contains 10 g lactulose/15 mL of oral solution. Bloating, borborygmi, and flatulence are common side effects as a result of colonic flora fermenting the lactulose.

Sorbitol

Clinical Context:  Sorbitol is an alcohol of glucose that is largely nonabsorbable. This agent is available as a 70% solution. As with lactulose, sorbitol is generally well tolerated and tastes quite sweet. Bloating, borborygmi, and flatulence are common side effects as a result of colonic flora fermenting the sorbitol.

Magnesium citrate (Citroma)

Clinical Context:  Magnesium is a divalent cation that is maximally absorbed in the distal small intestine. At low concentrations, magnesium appears to be absorbed by a saturable carrier-mediated process influenced by vitamin D. At higher concentrations, magnesium absorption appears to occur largely by diffusion and is quite inefficient. Increased serum magnesium levels may release cholecystokinin, which stimulates gastrointestinal motility and secretion; this may explain why some children experience abdominal cramping.

Sodium acid phosphate (OsmoPrep, Visicol)

Clinical Context:  Phosphate is a divalent anion largely absorbed in the proximal small intestine. When this agent is administered as an enema, only small amounts are absorbed such that the phosphate functions as an osmotic agent. Each 15 mL contains 7.2 g monobasic sodium phosphate monohydrate and 2.7 g dibasic sodium phosphate heptahydrate.

Class Summary

Osmotic laxatives produce an osmotic effect in the colon that results in distention and promotes peristalsis.

Mineral oil (Kondremul)

Clinical Context:  Mineral oil is a nonabsorbable fat that softens stool and decreases water absorption, partly by its metabolism in the colon to hydroxy fatty acids. This agent is largely tasteless and has an oily consistency that is made more palatable if it is cold or mixed into a fluid (eg, orange juice). When mineral oil is taken in high doses, many children experience seepage of orange oil into their underwear, which can produce perianal pruritus.

Class Summary

Lubricating agents soften stools and decrease water absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. They may also promote salt and water secretion by the colon.

Senna (Ex-Lax, Senokot, Fletcher's, Little Tummys)

Clinical Context:  Sennosides are plant alkaloids that stimulate colonic salt and water secretion and promote colonic motility. At higher doses, these agents often produce abdominal cramping. Long-term use in animals has not been associated with any evidence of cathartic colon, tachyphylaxis, or secondary hyperaldosteronism.

Bisacodyl (Dulcolax, Bisco-Lax)

Clinical Context:  Bisacodyl is a colorless and odorless compound that is very poorly absorbed. This agent can be administered orally or rectally. Bisacodyl increases colonic peristalsis and stimulates salt and water secretion.

Class Summary

Stimulant laxatives increase peristaltic activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Most of these agents also stimulate salt and water secretion in the colon.

Docusate sodium (Colace, Docu-Soft, Diocto, DSS)

Clinical Context:  Docusate sodium is used to avoid straining during defecation. This agent allows incorporation of water and fat into the stool, causing it to soften.

Class Summary

Stool softening agents allow incorporation of water and fat into the stool, causing the stool to soften.

Senna concentrate/docusate (Peri-Colace, Senokot, Dok Plus)

Clinical Context:  Docusate sodium allows incorporation of water and fat into the stool, causing it to soften. Casanthranol is an anthraquinone stimulant hydrolyzed by colonic bacteria into an active compound. Action is usually produced 8-12 hours after administration of this combination.

Class Summary

Emollient stool softeners cause stool to soften. Stimulants increase peristaltic activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Most of both these types of agents also promote salt and water secretion by the colon.

What is pediatric constipation?How common is pediatric constipation?How is pediatric constipation defined?What is the anatomy of the colon relevant to pediatric constipation?What is the pathophysiology of pediatric constipation?What is the prevalence of pediatric constipation in the US?What is the global prevalence of pediatric constipation?Which age groups have the highest prevalence of pediatric constipation?What is included in patient education about pediatric constipation?What is the focus of the clinical history to evaluate pediatric constipation?Which clinical history findings are characteristic of pediatric constipation?Which rectal exam findings are characteristic of pediatric constipation?What does a finding of sacral dimples or pits indicate in the evaluation of pediatric constipation?What does failure to elicit an anal wink reflex indicate in the evaluation of pediatric constipation?Which conditions are included in the differential diagnoses of pediatric constipation?How is pediatric constipation differentiated from Hirschsprung disease?What are the differential diagnoses for Pediatric Constipation?How is pediatric constipation diagnosed?What is the role of abdominal radiography in the workup of pediatric constipation?What is the role of contrast enema in the workup of pediatric constipation?What is the role of air-contrast enemas in the workup of pediatric constipation?What is the role of anorectal manometry in the workup of pediatric constipation?What is the role of rectal biopsy in the workup of pediatric constipation?What is the role of ultrasonography in the workup of pediatric constipation?How is pediatric constipation treated?What is the role of colon evacuation in the treatment of pediatric constipation?What is the role of laxatives in the treatment of pediatric constipation?How are regular toilet habits established in the treatment of pediatric constipation?Which dietary modifications are used in the treatment of pediatric constipation?Which diet is recommended for the treatment of pediatric constipation?What is the role of cow milk in the treatment of pediatric constipation?What is the role of iron in the treatment of pediatric constipation?What is the role of probiotics in the treatment of pediatric constipation?Which specialist consultations are beneficial to patients with pediatric constipation?What is included in the long-term monitoring of pediatric constipation?What is the role of interferential electrical stimulation in the treatment of pediatric constipation?What is the role of medications in the treatment of pediatric constipation?Which medications in the drug class Stool Softeners in Combination With Stimulants are used in the treatment of Pediatric Constipation?Which medications in the drug class Stool Softeners are used in the treatment of Pediatric Constipation?Which medications in the drug class Stimulant Laxatives are used in the treatment of Pediatric Constipation?Which medications in the drug class Lubricants are used in the treatment of Pediatric Constipation?Which medications in the drug class Osmotic Laxatives are used in the treatment of Pediatric Constipation?

Author

Stephen M Borowitz, MD, Professor of Pediatrics and Public Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Virginia School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Carmen Cuffari, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology/Nutrition, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Received honoraria from Prometheus Laboratories for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Abbott Nutritionals for speaking and teaching. for: Abbott Nutritional, Abbvie, speakers' bureau.

Additional Contributors

Chris A Liacouras, MD, Director of Pediatric Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct. 101(10):2401-9. [View Abstract]
  2. Borowitz SM, Cox DJ, Kovatchev B, et al. Treatment of childhood constipation by primary care physicians: efficacy and predictors of outcome. Pediatrics. 2005 Apr. 115(4):873-7. [View Abstract]
  3. [Guideline] North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Evaluation and treatment of constipation in children: summary of updated recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Sep. 43(3):405-7. [View Abstract]
  4. Benninga M, Candy DC, Catto-Smith AG, et al. The Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Mar. 40(3):273-5. [View Abstract]
  5. Issenman RM, Hewson S, Pirhonen D, et al. Are chronic digestive complaints the result of abnormal dietary patterns? Diet and digestive complaints in children at 22 and 40 months of age. Am J Dis Child. 1987 Jun. 141(6):679-82. [View Abstract]
  6. Loening-Baucke V. Prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jun. 92(6):486-9. [View Abstract]
  7. Saps M, Sztainberg M, Di Lorenzo C. A prospective community-based study of gastroenterological symptoms in school-age children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Oct. 43(4):477-82. [View Abstract]
  8. Yong D, Beattie RM. Normal bowel habit and prevalence of constipation in primary-school children. Ambulatory Child Health. 1998. Vol 4: 277-82.
  9. de Araujo Sant Anna AM, Calcado AC. Constipation in school-aged children at public schools in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Aug. 29(2):190-3. [View Abstract]
  10. Borowitz SM, Cox DJ, Tam A, et al. Precipitants of constipation during early childhood. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 May-Jun. 16(3):213-8. [View Abstract]
  11. Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb. 58 (2):258-74. [View Abstract]
  12. MacGeorge CA, Williams DC, Vajta N, Morella K, Thacker PG, Russell S, et al. Understanding the Constipation Conundrum: Predictors of Obtaining an Abdominal Radiograph During the Emergency Department Evaluation of Pediatric Constipation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Jun 20. [View Abstract]
  13. Ferguson CC, Gray MP, Diaz M, Boyd KP. Reducing Unnecessary Imaging for Patients With Constipation in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatrics. 2017 Jul. 140 (1):[View Abstract]
  14. Hackethal V. Abdominal X-rays Decreased in Children With Constipation. Medscape News & Perspective. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/881602. June 14, 2017; Accessed: August 2, 2017.
  15. De Lorijn F, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP, et al. Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease: a prospective, comparative accuracy study of common tests. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun. 146(6):787-92. [View Abstract]
  16. Doniger SJ, Dessie A, Latronica C. Measuring the Transrectal Diameter on Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Diagnose Constipation in Children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Jun 14. [View Abstract]
  17. Abrahamian FP, Lloyd-Still JD. Chronic constipation in childhood: a longitudinal study of 186 patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Jun. 3(3):460-7. [View Abstract]
  18. Varni JW, Bendo CB, Nurko S, Shulman RJ, Self MM, Franciosi JP, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Functional and Organic Gastrointestinal Diseases. J Pediatr. 2014 Sep 17. [View Abstract]
  19. Loening-Baucke V. Polyethylene glycol without electrolytes for children with constipation and encopresis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002 Apr. 34(4):372-7. [View Abstract]
  20. Bekkali NL, van den Berg MM, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Rectal fecal impaction treatment in childhood constipation: enemas versus high doses oral PEG. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec. 124(6):e1108-15. [View Abstract]
  21. Miller MK, Dowd MD, Friesen CA, Walsh-Kelly CM. A Randomized Trial of Enema Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Fecal Disimpaction in Children Presenting to an Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jan 20. [View Abstract]
  22. Pijpers MA, Tabbers MM, Benninga MA, Berger MY. Currently recommended treatments of childhood constipation are not evidence based: a systematic literature review on the effect of laxative treatment and dietary measures. Arch Dis Child. 2009 Feb. 94(2):117-31. [View Abstract]
  23. Corkins MR. Are diet and constipation related in children?. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005 Oct. 20(5):536-9. [View Abstract]
  24. Iacono G, Cavataio F, Montalto G, et al. Intolerance of cow's milk and chronic constipation in children. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 15. 339(16):1100-4. [View Abstract]
  25. Lloyd B, Halter RJ, Kuchan MJ, et al. Formula tolerance in postbreastfed and exclusively formula-fed infants. Pediatrics. 1999 Jan. 103(1):E7. [View Abstract]
  26. Vandenplas Y, Benninga M. Probiotics and functional gastrointestinal disorders in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Apr. 48 Suppl 2:S107-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Guandalini S, Cernat E, Moscoso D. Prebiotics and probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in children. Benef Microbes. 2014 Nov 12. 1-9. [View Abstract]
  28. Indrio F, Di Mauro A, Riezzo G, Civardi E, Intini C, Corvaglia L, et al. Prophylactic use of a probiotic in the prevention of colic, regurgitation, and functional constipation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Mar. 168 (3):228-33. [View Abstract]
  29. Muller-Lissner SA. Adverse effects of laxatives: fact and fiction. Pharmacology. 1993 Oct. 47 Suppl 1:138-45. [View Abstract]
  30. Schiller LR. Clinical pharmacology and use of laxatives and lavage solutions. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan. 28(1):11-8. [View Abstract]
  31. Dupont C, Leluyer B, Amar F, et al. A dose determination study of polyethylene glycol 4000 in constipated children: factors influencing the maintenance dose. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Feb. 42(2):178-85. [View Abstract]
  32. Khan S, Campo J, Bridge JA, et al. Long-term outcome of functional childhood constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan. 52(1):64-9. [View Abstract]
  33. Sharifi-Rad L, Ladi-Seyedian SS, Manouchehri N, Alimadadi H, Allahverdi B, Motamed F, et al. Effects of Interferential Electrical Stimulation Plus Pelvic Floor Muscles Exercises on Functional Constipation in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb. 113 (2):295-302. [View Abstract]

Plain abdominal radiograph that demonstrates stool throughout the colon.

This image delineates common withholding behaviors in young children.

This table differentiates functional constipation from Hirschsprung disease.

Plain abdominal radiograph that demonstrates stool throughout the colon.

This unprepared single-contrast barium enema demonstrates a transition zone consistent with Hirschsprung disease.

Contrast enema of a patient with megasigmoid and impacted stool.

The images illustrate normal anorectal manometry with relaxation of the internal anal sphincter in response to rectal distention.

Position for enema administration in an infant.

Another position for enema administration.

Administration of an enema.

Incorrect enema administration. The enema is administered against stool impaction and cannot be successful.

Enema administration with a tube.

Enema with inflated Foley balloon catheter.

Administration of an enema against impacted stool.

Administration of an enema against fecal impaction.

Plain abdominal radiograph that demonstrates stool throughout the colon.

This table differentiates functional constipation from Hirschsprung disease.

This unprepared single-contrast barium enema demonstrates a transition zone consistent with Hirschsprung disease.

The images illustrate normal anorectal manometry with relaxation of the internal anal sphincter in response to rectal distention.

This image delineates common withholding behaviors in young children.

Contrast enema of a patient with megasigmoid and impacted stool.

Contrast enema in a patient in whom the rectosigmoid was resected.

Position for enema administration in an infant.

Another position for enema administration.

Administration of an enema.

Incorrect enema administration. The enema is administered against stool impaction and cannot be successful.

Enema administration with a tube.

Enema with inflated Foley balloon catheter.

Administration of an enema against impacted stool.

Administration of an enema against fecal impaction.