Sacroiliac Joint Injection

Back

Background

The sacroiliac (SI) joint can be a source of low back pain. In assessing the etiology of the low back pain, a complete history, physical examination, psychosocial evaluation, and appropriate imaging may be helpful. Various clinical tests specific to the SI joint during the physical examination have been documented in aiding the diagnosis of SI pain.

By using SI anesthetic blocks for diagnosis, the SI joint has been shown to be a source of pain in 10-27% of suspected cases of chronic low back pain.[1]  Patients with medical conditions such as gout, rheumatoid arthritis, Marie-Strumpell or ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, fracture, malignancy, congenital deformity, or infection can also develop pain in the SI joint.

Pregnant women are at risk for SI joint pain because pregnant women produce a hormone called relaxin, which causes excess motion at the SI joint.[2]  Patients with a leg length discrepancy can also develop SI joint pain.[3]  In addition, any condition that limits weightbearing (eg, history of surgery on a limb or pain in the lower extremity) may cause SI joint pain because of the uneven distribution of weightbearing during the gait cycle.[3]  Patients who have undergone prior spinal surgery may also have increased SI joint pain.[4, 1]

 Injection of the SI joint (see Technique) can be either diagnostic or therapeutic.

Indications

Indications for SI joint injection are as follows:

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications for SI joint injection include the following:

Relative contraindications include the following:

Patients taking anticoagulation medications have an increased bleeding time; therefore, such medications should be held for 7 days prior to the injection and for 24 hours after the injection. Patients taking anticoagulants for reasons such as stroke and heart disease should speak to the prescribing physician before holding the anticoagulation medication for the procedure.

Technical Considerations

Anatomy

The SI articulation is an amphiarthrodial joint, formed between the auricular surfaces of the sacrum and the ilium. The articular surface of each bone is covered with a thin plate of cartilage. They are separated by a space containing a synoviumlike fluid; hence, the joint presents the characteristics of a diarthrosis. The ligaments surrounding the joint are the interosseous ligament and the anterior and posterior SI ligaments.

Motion at the joint is limited; in one analysis, rotation was a mean of 2.5° (0.8-3.9°), and joint translational movement was a mean of 0.7 mm (0.1-1.6 mm).[5]  No difference was reported in the motion between symptomatic and asymptomatic joints.

The morphologic and physiologic base for pain signals originating from the normal anterior capsular and interosseous ligaments is provided by the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P immunoreactive fibers present in these ligaments.[6]  Therefore, both extra-articular and intra-articular approaches should be considered for diagnostic infiltration for SI joint pain.

An anatomic study on adult cadavers demonstrated that the SI joint is predominantly, if not entirely, innervated by sacral dorsal rami.[7]

In 2001, Murata et al performed a study to delineate the sensory innervation in the ventral and dorsal sides of the SI joint.[8]  They reported that the dorsal innervation derives from the dorsal root ganglions of the lower lumbar and sacral levels (from L4 to S2), and the ventral innervation originates from the dorsal root ganglions of the upper lumbar, lower lumbar, and sacral levels (from L1 to S2).

The presence of nerve fibers and mechanoreceptors in the SI ligament has been demonstrated.[9]  Referral patterns based on SI joint provocation and analgesia have been published[10, 11, 12] ; however, the only pain pattern found to be associated with patients who responded to SI joint injections was groin pain.[13]

Outcomes

As many as two thirds of patients may have significant improvement of approximately 9 months' duration with steroid injection. The pain may recur, and the injection can be repeated.[14, 15] However, systematic reviews have found the short- and long-term effectiveness of intra-articular SI injections to be poor.[16]

A double-blind study was done in 10 patients with painful sacroiliitis.[17] A total of 13 joints were injected with either steroid (n = 6) or placebo (n = 7). At 1 month, patients described greater than 70% pain relief in five of the six SI joints injected with corticosteroids. No pain relief was reported in the placebo-injected joints.

Preprocedural Planning

In assessing the etiology of low back pain, a complete history, physical examination, psychosocial evaluation, and appropriate imaging may be helpful. Various clinical tests specific to the sacroiliac (SI) joint during the physical examination have been documented in aiding the diagnosis of SI pain.

Physical examination

The Gillette test is done with the patient in the standing position. The patient stands on one leg while flexing the opposite hip and knee into the chest. Motion of the SI joint is assessed by placing one thumb under the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) on the side of hip flexion, with the other thumb in the midline at the S2 level. Normally, the thumb under the PSIS drops inferiorly and laterally with hip flexion. Restriction is indicated by decreased motion compared to the normal side.

In the Fortin finger test, the patient points to the area of pain with one finger. The result is positive if the site of pain is within 1 cm of the PSIS, generally inferomedially.

The Patrick test or Faber maneuver involves flexion, abduction, and external rotation of the hip. The patient lies supine, with the heel of the tested side placed on the opposite knee. Pressure is put on the flexed knee and the opposite anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) area. The  test result is positive for SI dysfunction if pain is elicited in the SI joint area. The sensitivity of this test in predicting response from SI joint injection is reportedly low (57%),[18, 19, 20]  whereas others have reported 77% sensitivity and 100% specificity[21] ; however, the accuracy of these studies has been questioned.[22]

In the Gaenslen test, the patient is supine. The hip and knee are maximally flexed toward the trunk, and the opposite leg is extended. Pressure is applied to the flexed extremity. The finding is positive if pain is felt across the SI joint. This test was found to be 68% sensitive and 35% specific.[23, 24]  However, the validity of this test has also been questioned.[25]

In the compression test, the patient lies on one side. The examiner applies pressure on one pelvic brim in the direction of the other. A positive result is pain across the SI joint.

In the Van Durson standing flexion test, the patient is standing with the examiner behind him. The examiner’s thumbs are placed just below each PSIS. The patient flexes the trunk forward without bending the knees. A positive sign is asymmetric motion.

In the Piedallu seated flexion test, the patient is seated with the examiner behind him. The examiner’s thumbs are placed just below the PSIS. The patient flexes the trunk forward. A positive result is asymmetry of motion.

An individual positive clinical test result may not prove to be indicative of SI joint pain. However, if three clinical tests reveal positive results, the likelihood that the pain originates from the SI joint is greatly increased.[26]

Imaging

If the SI joint is strongly suspected as the origin of the pain, imaging may be indicated. Plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the SI joint can be performed, but results can be misleading. In fact, one study showed that CT findings were negative in 42% of symptomatic SI joints.[27]  MRI has not been proved to be positively correlated with the diagnosis of SI joint pain.

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) proposed the following criteria for making the diagnosis of SI joint pain[28] :

Equipment

Equipment used for SI joint injection includes the following:

Patient Preparation

Anesthesia

Procedural sedation (eg, with midazolam or fentanyl) is seldom (but occasionally) used, because it is important for the patient’s perception of pain to remain intact during the injection. For this reason, anxiolytics are preferred to analgesics in this setting.

Positioning

The patient should be in the modified Sims position, with the pelvis rotated until the joint appears clearly under fluoroscopy.[29]  Placing a pillow under the patient's hip can further enhance visualization of the SI joint. A 30º cephalad tilt view and Ferguson view provide good visualization of the anterior and posterior articular margins of the SI joint.[30]

Approach Considerations

Initial management of patients with pain originating from the sacroiliac (SI) joint may include oral medications, education, and physical therapy. Physical therapy can help relieve pain by strengthening the muscles surrounding the SI joint. In addition, ultrasound, deep heat, electrical stimulation, traction, and mobilization can help with pain relief.[31]  If conservative management techniques fail to resolve the patient’s pain, a diagnostic or therapeutic injection into the joint can be performed.

Injection of Sacroiliac Joint

Fluoroscopy-guided injection

Position the patient as described (see Patient Preparation). Clean the skin with povidone-iodine solution; chlorhexidine may be substituted for patients with povidone-iodine allergy. The povidone-iodine solution should dry on the skin to have its full antibacterial effect.

An older technique of injection involves the insertion of three 22-gauge spinal needles into the inferior, middle, and superior aspects of the joint. Currently, however, insertion of a single needle in the inferior aspect of the joint is preferred.[13, 32]  Insert the needle in a medial-to-lateral direction. It is recommended that the needle be inserted 1.75 in. (~4.5 cm) caudal to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS).[33]

After skin infiltration, place the spinal needle over the joint coaxial on the skin. Advance the needle through the skin, capsule, and ligaments of the joint until it is introduced into the joint. To limit motion at the needle, attach the syringe filled with contrast to the spinal needle with extension tubing.

Inject approximately 1 mL of contrast. This should outline the joint, which can be easily viewed under fluoroscopy (see the image below). Use of pulsed imaging and culmination reduces radiation exposure. Immediately after injecting contrast, ask the patient whether he or she feels any pain and, if so, whether it feels like the typical pain in that location.



View Image

Sacroiliac joint, normal arthrogram. Left side is prone view, right side is posterior oblique view.

After the needle location has been confirmed with contrast, inject 1 mL of lidocaine or bupivacaine (see the images below). A corticosteroid can be combined with the local anesthetic.[34]



View Image

Sacroiliac injection.



View Image

Sacroiliac injection.

After the anesthetic is injected, ask the patient if his or her pain is relieved. Reevaluate the patient’s pain before discharging. A pain scale, such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), is commonly used to monitor patients’ progress. A greater than 75% reduction of pain over the SI joint is considered a definitive response.[13]

Ultrasonography-guided injection

In the ultrasonography (US)-guided approach, as in the fluoroscopy-guided approach, the patient is positioned prone with a pillow under the pelvis. The skin is prepared to reduce infection risk. The ultrasound machine should be on the opposite side of the patient from the practitioner to allow better visualization with minimal movement. 

In most cases, a curvilinear transducer yields the best visualization. First, identify the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). After this landmark is seen, translate the probe medially to locate the S1 foramen. Then, move the probe inderiorly from the PSIS to visualize the inferior portion of the SI joint, which is lateral to the S2 foramen. Insert the needle in plane with the probe from medial to lateral to ensure avoidance of the S2 foramen. Needle placement is confirmed with contrast-enhanced real-time fluoroscopy.[35]

Guidance by fluoroscopy vs CT, US, or MRI

Although SI joint injection can be attempted blind, intra-articular injection without fluoroscopy is successful in only 12-56% of attempts.[36, 37] Procedures guided by computed tomography (CT), US, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also developed; however, as various authors noted, additional data would be needed for definitive comparison of the efficacy of these procedures with that of fluoroscopy-guided injection.[38, 39]

In a prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing US-guided with fluoroscopy-guided SI joint intra-articular injections in noninflammatory SI joint dysfunction, Jee et al found that the US-guided approach was as therapeutically effective as the fluoroscopy-guided approach but was less diagnostically effective because of its significantly lower accuracy (87.3%).[40]

A cadaveric study of 17 SI joints injected under US guidance found that intra-articular injection was achieved in 88.2%.[41]  In a study comparing fluoroscopically guided SI joint injection with US-guided injection in 40 patients with chronic low back pain, Soneji et al identified no significant difference in pain scores between the fluoroscopy group and the US group at 1 month or at any other follow-up points, nor were there any significant differences in procedure-related variables, physical function, discomfort, opioid utilization, and patient satisfaction.[42]

In a prospective institutional study of the cost-effectiveness of CT-guided SI injection, Bydon et al determined that this approach yielded improvements in pain and activities of daily living, at a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) falling well below the threshold cost of 1 QALY, and was strongly cost-effective.[43]

A study by Althoff et al found that CT-guided intra-articular steroid instillation was able to achieve adequate pain and symptom control for 6 months in patients suffering from active sacroiliitis.[44]

Intra-articular vs periarticular injection

Extra-articular or periarticular corticosteroid injections have been reported to provide significant benefit for SI joint area pain.[45, 46, 47]

In 2007, Murakami et al studied whether intra-articular or periarticular injections were more effective at relieving SI joint pain.[48] They initially gave patients intra-articular SI joint injections and then performed additional periarticular injections in the patients who experienced no improvement from the intra-articular injection. The improvement from the periarticular injections was significantly higher than that from the intra-articular injections. This result could have various causes, including the following:

In a 2016 study of 113 fluoroscopically guided SI joint injections in 99 patients, Nacey et al found that after adjustments were made for age, sex, preinjection pain score, time of year, and indication for injection, there was no significant difference between intra-articular injection and periarticular injection in terms of the degree of pain relief achieved.[49]

Other Treatments for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

If there is severe arthritis of the SI joint, then the injection often is not very effective on a long-term basis.[50]

If diagnostic injections are positive for SI joint etiology but relief from injection is only temporary, radiofrequency neurotomy of the SI joint can be performed to potentially provide longer results.[51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]

Some studies indicated some effectiveness in injecting onabotulinumtoxinA or hypertonic dextrose for SI joint pain.[57, 58, 59]

Surgery is rarely performed for SI joint pain. Surgery has been considered if other treatments do not work; however, results have been very disappointing.[60]

Complications

Adverse effects seen with SI joint injection are minimal. The most commonly reported immediate adverse effect is a vasovagal reaction; the most common delayed adverse effect is a temporary increase in pain.[61]

As with any injection through the skin, bacteria may gain entry at the injection site and cause an infection. Some adverse effects may occur as a result of the corticosteroid administered. Patients who have diabetes may notice that their blood sugar levels are elevated for 2-3 days following the procedure.

What is a sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?When are sacroiliac (SI) joint injections indicated?What are the contraindications for sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What is the anatomy of the lower back pain relevant to sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What are the reported outcomes of sacroiliac (SI) joint injections?What is included in the evaluation of sacroiliac (SI) joint pain prior to injection?Which tests are performed in the physical exam prior to sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What is the role of imaging prior to sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What are the IASP diagnostic criteria for sacroiliac (SI) joint pain?Which equipment is needed to perform sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What is the role of anesthesia in sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?How is the patient positioned for administration of sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?How is sacroiliac (SI) joint pain treated prior to SI injection?How is fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac (SI) joint injection performed?How is ultrasonography-guided sacroiliac (SI) joint injection performed?What is efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What is the efficacy of periarticular sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?What are alternatives to injection for the treatment of sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction?What are the possible complications of sacroiliac (SI) joint injection?

Author

Stephen Kishner, MD, MHA, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program Director, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John L Faciane, Jr, MD, Chief Resident in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Erik D Schraga, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mills-Peninsula Emergency Medical Associates

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Mariam Chowdhry, DO, Resident Physician, Department of Physical Medical and Rehabilitation, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Maigne JY, Planchon CA. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J. 2005 Sep. 14(7):654-8. [View Abstract]
  2. Russell R, Reynolds F. Back pain, pregnancy, and childbirth. BMJ. 1997 Apr 12. 314(7087):1062-3. [View Abstract]
  3. Chi B. Sacroiliitis. Warfield C, Fausett H, eds. Manual of Pain Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. 95-8.
  4. Katz V, Schofferman J, Reynolds J. The sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Feb. 16 (1):96-9. [View Abstract]
  5. Sturesson B, Selvik G, Udén A. Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Feb. 14 (2):162-5. [View Abstract]
  6. Szadek KM, Hoogland PV, Zuurmond WW, de Lange JJ, Perez RS. Nociceptive nerve fibers in the sacroiliac joint in humans. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jan-Feb. 33 (1):36-43. [View Abstract]
  7. Fortin JD, Kissling RO, O'Connor BL, Vilensky JA. Sacroiliac joint innervation and pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1999 Dec. 28 (12):687-90. [View Abstract]
  8. Murata Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takahashi Y, Shimada Y, Moriya H. Origin and pathway of sensory nerve fibers to the ventral and dorsal sides of the sacroiliac joint in rats. J Orthop Res. 2001 May. 19 (3):379-83. [View Abstract]
  9. Vilensky JA, O'Connor BL, Fortin JD, Merkel GJ, Jimenez AM, Scofield BA, et al. Histologic analysis of neural elements in the human sacroiliac joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1. 27 (11):1202-7. [View Abstract]
  10. Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S, Pier J. Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part I: Asymptomatic volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jul 1. 19 (13):1475-82. [View Abstract]
  11. Fortin JD, Aprill CN, Ponthieux B, Pier J. Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part II: Clinical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jul 1. 19 (13):1483-9. [View Abstract]
  12. Slipman CW, Jackson HB, Lipetz JS, Chan KT, Lenrow D, Vresilovic EJ. Sacroiliac joint pain referral zones. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Mar. 81 (3):334-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1. 20 (1):31-7. [View Abstract]
  14. Liliang PC, Lu K, Weng HC, Liang CL, Tsai YD, Chen HJ. The therapeutic efficacy of sacroiliac joint blocks with triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction without spondyloarthropathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 20. 34(9):896-900. [View Abstract]
  15. Hawkins J, Schofferman J. Serial therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections: a practice audit. Pain Med. 2009 Jul-Aug. 10(5):850-3. [View Abstract]
  16. Hansen H, Manchikanti L, Simopoulos TT, Christo PJ, Gupta S, Smith HS, et al. A systematic evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun. 15(3):E247-78. [View Abstract]
  17. Maugars Y, Mathis C, Berthelot JM, Charlier C, Prost A. Assessment of the efficacy of sacroiliac corticosteroid injections in spondylarthropathies: a double-blind study. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Aug. 35 (8):767-70. [View Abstract]
  18. van der Wurff P, Hagmeijer RH, Meyne W. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Man Ther. 2000 Feb. 5 (1):30-6. [View Abstract]
  19. van der Wurff P, Meyne W, Hagmeijer RH. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Man Ther. 2000 May. 5(2):89-96. [View Abstract]
  20. Russel AS, Maksymowych W, LeClercq S. Clinical examination of the sacroiliac joints: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 1981 Dec. 24 (12):1575-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Broadhurst NA, Bond MJ. Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord. 1998 Aug. 11(4):341-5. [View Abstract]
  22. Bogduk N. Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord. 1999 Aug. 12(4):357-8. [View Abstract]
  23. Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Pauza K, McLarty J, Bogduk N. The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 15. 21 (22):2594-602. [View Abstract]
  24. Dreyfuss P, Dryer S, Griffin J, Hoffman J, Walsh N. Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15. 19 (10):1138-43. [View Abstract]
  25. Russel AS, Maksymowych W, LeClercq S. Clinical examination of the sacroiliac joints: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 1981 Dec. 24(12):1575-7. [View Abstract]
  26. van der Wurff P, Buijs EJ, Groen GJ. A multitest regimen of pain provocation tests as an aid to reduce unnecessary minimally invasive sacroiliac joint procedures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan. 87 (1):10-4. [View Abstract]
  27. Elgafy H, Semaan HB, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ. Computed tomography findings in patients with sacroiliac pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan. 112-8. [View Abstract]
  28. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definition of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.
  29. Todd D, Mohamed S. Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in pain management. Borsook D, LeBel A, McPeek B, eds. The Mass General Handbook of Pain Management. Boston: Little, Brown; 1996. 134-84.
  30. Bernard TN, Cassidy JD. The sacroiliac joint syndrome: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Frymayer JW, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. New York: Raven Press; 1991. 2107-30.
  31. Simon S. Sacroiliac joint injection and low back pain. Waldman S, ed. Interventional Pain Management. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. 335-339.
  32. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Burton CV. Managing Low Back Pain. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1999. 121-48.
  33. Rana SH, Farjoodi P, Haloman S, Dutton P, Hariri A, Ward SR, et al. Anatomic Evaluation of the Sacroiliac Joint: A Radiographic Study with Implications for Procedures. Pain Physician. 2015 Nov. 18 (6):583-92. [View Abstract]
  34. Pereira PL, Günaydin I, Trübenbach J, Dammann F, Remy CT, Kötter I, et al. Interventional MR imaging for injection of sacroiliac joints in patients with sacroiliitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul. 175 (1):265-6. [View Abstract]
  35. Tahaei SA, Baez-Cabrera LD, Lin PS, Furman MB. Sacroiliac intraarticular joint injection: ultrasound guidance. Furman MB, Berkwits L, Cohen I, Goodman BS, Kirschner JS, Lee TS, et al, eds. Atlas of Image-Guided Spinal Procedures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. 181-4.
  36. Rosenberg JM, Quint TJ, de Rosayro AM. Computerized tomographic localization of clinically-guided sacroiliac joint injections. Clin J Pain. 2000 Mar. 16(1):18-21. [View Abstract]
  37. Hansen HC. Is fluoroscopy necessary for sacroiliac joint injections?. Pain Physician. 2003 Apr. 6(2):155-8. [View Abstract]
  38. Block BM, Hobelmann JG, Murphy KJ, Grabow TS. An imaging review of sacroiliac joint injection under computed tomography guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 May-Jun. 30(3):295-8. [View Abstract]
  39. Pekkafahli MZ, Kiralp MZ, Başekim CC, Silit E, Mutlu H, Oztürk E, et al. Sacroiliac joint injections performed with sonographic guidance. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Jun. 22 (6):553-9. [View Abstract]
  40. Jee H, Lee JH, Park KD, Ahn J, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb. 95(2):330-7. [View Abstract]
  41. Perry JM, Colberg RE, Dault SL, Beason DP, Tresgallo RA 3rd. A Cadaveric Study Assessing the Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections. PM R. 2016 Dec. 8 (12):1168-1172. [View Abstract]
  42. Soneji N, Bhatia A, Seib R, Tumber P, Dissanayake M, Peng PW. Comparison of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound Guidance for Sacroiliac Joint Injection in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2016 Jun. 16 (5):537-44. [View Abstract]
  43. Bydon M, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Youssef M, Gokaslan ZL, Meleka S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of CT-guided sacroiliac joint injections: a measure of QALY gained. Neurol Res. 2014 Oct. 36(10):915-20. [View Abstract]
  44. Althoff CE, Bollow M, Feist E, Marticorena-Garcia SR, Eshed I, Diekhoff T, et al. CT-guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joints: quality assurance and standardized prospective evaluation of long-term effectiveness over six months. Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun. 34 (6):1079-84. [View Abstract]
  45. Norman GF. Sacroiliac disease and its relationship to lower abdominal pain. Am J Surg. 1968 Jul. 116(1):54-6. [View Abstract]
  46. Schuchmann JA, Cannon CL. Sacroiliac strain syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Tex Med. 1986 Jun. 82(6):33-6. [View Abstract]
  47. Hartung W, Ross CJ, Straub R, Feuerbach S, Schölmerich J, Fleck M, et al. Ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in patients with established sacroiliitis: precise IA injection verified by MRI scanning does not predict clinical outcome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Aug. 49(8):1479-82. [View Abstract]
  48. Murakami E, Tanaka Y, Aizawa T, Ishizuka M, Kokubun S. Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Sci. 2007 May. 12 (3):274-80. [View Abstract]
  49. Nacey NC, Patrie JT, Fox MG. Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: Comparison of the Effects of Intraarticular and Periarticular Injections on Immediate and Short-Term Pain Relief. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov. 207 (5):1055-1061. [View Abstract]
  50. Savran Sahin B, Aktas E, Haberal B, Harman A, Canan Yazici A, Kaygusuz H, et al. Sacroiliac pain and CT-guided steroid injection treatment: high-grade arthritis has an adverse effect on outcomes in long-term follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Aug. 19 (15):2804-11. [View Abstract]
  51. Burnham RS, Yasui Y. An alternate method of radiofrequency neurotomy of the sacroiliac joint: a pilot study of the effect on pain, function, and satisfaction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb. 32(1):12-9. [View Abstract]
  52. Yin W, Willard F, Carreiro J, Dreyfuss P. Sensory stimulation-guided sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy: technique based on neuroanatomy of the dorsal sacral plexus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15. 28 (20):2419-25. [View Abstract]
  53. Cohen SP, Abdi S. Lateral branch blocks as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain: A pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Mar-Apr. 28(2):113-9. [View Abstract]
  54. Aydin SM, Gharibo CG, Mehnert M, Stitik TP. The role of radiofrequency ablation for sacroiliac joint pain: a meta-analysis. PM R. 2010 Sep. 2(9):842-51. [View Abstract]
  55. Cánovas Martínez L, Orduña Valls J, Paramés Mosquera E, Lamelas Rodríguez L, Rojas Gil S, Domínguez García M. Sacroiliac joint pain: Prospective, randomised, experimental and comparative study of thermal radiofrequency with sacroiliac joint block. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016 May. 63 (5):267-72. [View Abstract]
  56. Bellini M, Barbieri M. Single strip lesions radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two years' results. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016. 48 (1):19-22. [View Abstract]
  57. Lee JH, Lee SH, Song SH. Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin A compared to a mixture of steroid and local anesthetics as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med. 2010 May. 11(5):692-700. [View Abstract]
  58. Kim WM, Lee HG, Jeong CW, Kim CM, Yoon MH. A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Dec. 16(12):1285-90. [View Abstract]
  59. Cusi M, Saunders J, Hungerford B, Wisbey-Roth T, Lucas P, Wilson S. The use of prolotherapy in the sacroiliac joint. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Feb. 44(2):100-4. [View Abstract]
  60. Schutz U, Grob D. Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Jun. 72(3):296-308. [View Abstract]
  61. Plastaras CT, Joshi AB, Garvan C, Chimes GP, Smeal W, Rittenberg J, et al. Adverse events associated with fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac joint injections. PM R. 2012 Jul. 4(7):473-8. [View Abstract]

Sacroiliac joint, normal arthrogram. Left side is prone view, right side is posterior oblique view.

Sacroiliac injection.

Sacroiliac injection.

Sacroiliac joint, normal arthrogram. Left side is prone view, right side is posterior oblique view.

Sacroiliac injection.

Sacroiliac injection.