Meningioma

Back

Background

Meningioma, the term coined by Harvey Cushing, refers to a set of tumors that arise contiguously to the meninges (see the image below).



View Image

Case 1: Surgical view of the tumor. The dura is opened, and the meningioma can be seen extending en plaque over the surface of the brain.

See Brain Lesions: 9 Cases to Test Your Management Skills, a Critical Images slideshow, to review cases including meningiomas, glioblastomas and craniopharyngiomas, and to determine the best treatment options based on the case history and the associated images.

Pathophysiology

Meningiomas may occur intracranially or within the spinal canal. They are thought to arise from arachnoidal cap cells, which reside in the arachnoid layer covering the surface of the brain. See the images below.



View Image

Case 1: MRI of a meningioma on plaque.



View Image

Case 1: Bone-window CT reveals calcification of the meningioma.

Meningiomas commonly are found at the surface of the brain, either over the convexity or at the skull base. In rare cases, meningiomas occur in an intraventricular or intraosseous location. The problem of classifying meningioma is that arachnoidal cells may express both mesenchymal and epithelial characteristics. Other mesodermal structures also may give rise to similar tumors (eg, hemangiopericytomas or sarcomas). The classification of all of these tumors together is controversial. The current trend is to separate unequivocal meningiomas from other less well-defined neoplasms. Undoubtedly, advances in molecular biology will allow scientists to determine the exact genomic aberration responsible for each specific neoplasm.

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

The annual incidence of symptomatic meningiomas is approximately 2 cases per 100,000 individuals. Meningiomas account for approximately 20% of all primary intracranial neoplasms. However, the true prevalence is likely higher than this because autopsy studies reveal that 2.3% of individuals have undiagnosed asymptomatic meningiomas. Meningiomas are multiple in 5-40% of cases, particularly when they associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Familial meningiomas are rare unless associated with NF2.[1]

International

The frequency of meningiomas in Africa is nearly 30% of all primary intracranial tumors.[2]

Mortality/Morbidity

Mortality and morbidity rates for meningiomas are difficult to assess. Some meningiomas are discovered fortuitously when CT or MRI is done to assess for unrelated diseases or conditions. Therefore, some patients die with meningioma and not from it. Estimates of the 5-year survival usually range from 73-94%.

A systematic review of the literature regarding the clinical behavior of small, untreated meningiomas suggests that most meningiomas 2.5 cm or less in diameter do not proceed to cause symptoms in the 5 years following their discovery. Patients with tumors 2.5-3 cm in initial size went on to develop new or worsened symptoms 17% of the time. Those that do cause symptoms can usually be predicted with close radiographic follow-up.[3]

Meningiomas usually grow slowly, and they may produce severe morbidity before causing death.

Factors that may be predictive of a high postoperative morbidity rate include patient-related factors (eg, advanced age, comorbid states such as diabetes or coronary artery disease, preoperative neurological status), tumor factors (eg, location, size, consistency, vascularity, vascular or neural involvement), previous surgery, or previous radiation therapy.

Race

Meningiomas are more prevalent in Africa than in North America or Europe. In Los Angeles County, meningioma is reported more commonly in African Americans than in others.

Sex

Meningiomas afflict women more often than men. The male-to-female ratio ranges from 1:1.4 to 1:2.8.

Age

The incidence increases with age. Ages and corresponding incidence rates reported from 2002 are as follows:

History

Meningiomas produce their symptoms by several mechanisms. They may cause symptoms by irritating the underlying cortex, compressing the brain or the cranial nerves, producing hyperostosis[4] and/or invading the overlying soft tissues, or inducing vascular injuries to the brain.[5] The signs and symptoms secondary to meningiomas may appear or become exacerbated during pregnancy but usually abate or improve in the postpartum period.

Physical

The physical findings mirror the aforementioned symptoms and include signs due to raised intracranial pressure, involvement of cranial nerves, compression of the underlying parenchyma, and involvement of bone and subcutaneous tissues by the meningioma.

Causes

Trauma and viruses have been investigated as possible causative agents for development of meningiomas. However, no definitive proof has yet been found.

The role of inflammation (eg, posttraumatic insult) resulting in the upregulation of COX-2 has been investigated in the tumorogenesis of meningiomas.[8]

On the other hand, the role of radiation in the genesis of meningiomas has been shown.

Genetic causes have been implicated in the development of meningiomas.

Several findings suggest an association between hormones and the risk for meningiomas, including increased incidence in women versus men and the presence of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors on some of these tumors. However, the exact nature of this relationship and its implication on the management of meningiomas remain under investigation.

According to a systematic review of the literature, individuals who are overweight or obese and those who do not engage in physical activity have an increased risk for meningioma. With normal weight used as the reference group, being overweight (BMI, 25 to 29.9) was associated with a 20% increased risk for meningioma, and obesity (BMI, 30 or more) was associated with a 50% increased risk. In contrast, being overweight or obese was not related to glioma.[13, 14]

Whether cell phone use increases the risk of meningiomas (and of brain tumors in general) remains of great interest, especially with the recent tremendous increase in the use of these devices worldwide. At present, the available data do not support such an association; however, all published studies have relatively small sample sizes and a short period of follow-up.[15]

Laboratory Studies

No specific laboratory tests are used to screen for meningioma.

Imaging Studies

Imaging studies are the mainstay of diagnosis. See images below for representative radiologic views of various subtypes.

Plain skull radiograph may reveal hyperostosis and increased vascular markings of the skull, as well as intracranial calcifications.

On plain head CT scans, meningiomas are usually dural-based tumors that are isoattenuating to slightly hyperattenuating.

On T1- and T2-weighted MRIs, the tumors have variable signal intensity. If a meningioma is suspected, obtaining an enhanced MRI is imperative.

Cystic meningiomas may exhibit intratumoral or peritumoral cysts. The peritumoral cysts may actually represent a gliotic response and may not necessitate surgical extirpation.

Endovascular angiography allows the surgeon to preoperatively determine the vascularization of the tumor and its encroachment on vital vascular structures.

Late venous images are important to determine the patency of the involved dural sinuses.

Angiographic features of meningiomas include the following:

Although magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) have decreased the role of classical angiography, the latter remains a powerful tool for planning surgery.

Angiography is still indispensable if embolization of the tumor is deemed necessary.

New research tools such as positron emission tomography (PET), including octreotide-PET, or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have been used to predict in vivo the aggressiveness of meningiomas.[16] See the images below.



View Image

Case 1: MRI of a meningioma on plaque.



View Image

Case 1: Bone-window CT reveals calcification of the meningioma.



View Image

Case 2: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of a meningioma invading the overlying dura and bone. Compare with appearance in Case 1.



View Image

Case 2: Bone-window CT scan reveals the skull involvement. Note the absence of tumoral calcification.



View Image

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows the enhancing meningioma. Transverse T1-weighted MRIs shows isointensity of the tumor....



View Image

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI immediately (A) and 2 years after surgery (B-D). Transverse images show posterior (a....



View Image

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma A, Pathology showed syncytial meningioma. Note hypercellularity and minimal whorling (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifi....



View Image

Case 4: Recurrent subcutaneous meningioma. A, Patient underwent surgery for a parieto-occipital meningioma in 1978. She was lost to follow-up until 19....



View Image

Case 5: Bilateral olfactory meningioma invading the facial sinuses. Coronal (A), transverse (B), and sagittal (C) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI ....



View Image

Case 6: Subfrontal meningioma in a patient with abnormal behavior. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan clearly shows bilateral subfrontal meningioma. B, Tran....



View Image

Case 7: Parasagittal meningioma invading the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). A, Sagittal T1-weighted MRI shows a meningioma (arrow). B, T2-weighted MRI....



View Image

This is an extra-axial tumor. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and astrocytoma are intraparenchymal tumors, and GBM enhances in a variegated fashion. Aco....

Procedures

Preoperative endovascular embolization of the vascular feeders from the external circulation may be beneficial in extremely vascular meningiomas.[17] If this is the case, resection should be performed shortly after embolization to decrease the likelihood of tumor revascularization.

Histologic Findings

Meningiomas are usually globular, well-demarcated neoplasms. They have a wide dural attachment and become invaginated into the underlying brain without invading it. Their cut surface is either translucent pale or homogeneously reddish brown. It may be gritty on cutting. Some meningiomas occur as a sheetlike extension that covers the dura but does not invaginate the parenchyma; this variant is called meningioma en plaque. The last morphologic variant is the cavernous sinus meningioma that infiltrates the cavernous sinus and becomes interdigitated with its contents. The 3 most common histologic subtypes of meningiomas are the meningothelial (syncytial), transitional, and fibroblastic meningiomas. See images below for representative pathologic views of various subtypes.



View Image

Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification X400 in A-B, X100 in C-D). A, Fibroblastic meningioma (arrowheads) abutting the dura (arro....



View Image

Case 4: Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X400). A, Meningioma with malignant features, as evinced by prominent nucleoli (ye....

Meningothelial meningiomas reveal densely packed cells that are arranged in sheets with no clearly discernible cytoplasmic borders. Although not prominent, whorls are present (calcified whorls are termed psammoma bodies). Nuclei show intranuclear vacuoles.

Fibroblastic (fibrous) meningiomas reveal sheets of interlacing spindle cells. The intercellular stroma is composed of reticulin and collagen. The transitional variety reveals features common to both the meningothelial and fibroblastic varieties; others include angiomatous, microcystic, secretory,[18] clear cell, choroid, lymphoplasmacyte-rich, papillary, and metaplastic variants.

Meningiomas may be associated with hyperostosis.[4] The exact nature of the cause of this hyperostosis is controversial (ie, reactive versus tumoral infiltration).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry can help diagnose meningiomas, which are positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) in 80% of cases. They stain negative for anti-Leu 7 antibodies (positive in schwannomas) and for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Progesterone receptors can be demonstrated in the cytosol of meningiomas; the presence of other sex hormone receptors is much less consistent. Somatostatin receptors also have been demonstrated consistently in meningiomas.[19]

Malignancy

The notion of malignancy in meningiomas is still vague.[20] Some histologic variants, such as papillary meningioma, undoubtedly carry a less favorable prognosis than other histologic types.[21] Two features are considered clear signs of malignancy: cortical invasion by the tumor and distal metastasis. Of note, in the 2007 WHO grading scheme, brain invasion is considered a criterion for atypia.

Several stains have been used to help predict the behavior of meningiomas. These stains quantify the mitotic rate of these tumors. Bromodeoxyuridine (BudR) labeling requires an intravenous (IV) injection before tumor removal. On the other hand, immunohistologic staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be performed on fixed specimens. Some have attempted to correlate the pathology and behavior of meningiomas to the loss of specific genetic material.

The World Health Organization classification of meningiomas is presented in Table 2.

Table. Summary of the 2007 WHO Grading Scheme for Meningiomas



View Table

See Table

 

The expression levels of E- cadherin and beta-catenin were found to be inversely correlated with peritumoral edema, aggressiveness of meningiomas, and probability of recurrence.[23]

In a review of 21 pediatric meningiomas operated on over a period of 24 years, 24% were WHO grade II and 24% where associated with a large cystic component.[24]

Medical Care

Medical care for meningiomas has been disappointing. It is restricted either to perioperative drugs or to medications that are used after all other means of treatment have failed.[25]

The use of corticosteroids preoperatively and postoperatively has significantly decreased the mortality and morbidity rates associated with surgical resection.

Antiepileptic drugs should be started preoperatively in supratentorial surgery and continued postoperatively for no less than 3 months.

The current experience with chemotherapy is disappointing.

Although most meningiomas grow slowly and have a low mitotic rate, clinical benefit has been reported in many case series with either tumor regression or stasis after radiotherapy; however, these results have not been confirmed in randomized trials. Oya et al reported on the natural history of meningiomas.[29] The prospect of benign meningioma growth is an important factor to consider in their proper management. Approximately 40% of 273 meningiomas (in 244 patients) grew within a 4-year period. Lack of calcification, hyperintensity in T2 MRI, and peritumoral edema were predictors of growth in follow up. In addition, age younger than 60 years and tumor size larger than 25 mm (diameter) were also associated with a greater risk.

Radiotherapy is mainly used as adjuvant therapy for incompletely resected, high-grade and/or recurrent tumors. It can also be used as primary treatment in some cases (optic nerve meningiomas[30] and some unresectable tumors).[31, 32]

In general, the ideal treatment of a benign meningioma is surgical resection if possible. Hasegawa et al treated 46 patients with gamma knife radiation (GKR) as the initial treatment modality.[33] The lesions were falcine, convexity, or parasagittal. The study found GKR to be effective. The main caveat was tumor size. Large tumors had the possibility of severe postirradiation edema. This was actually more likely to occur with significant, baseline peritumoral edema. GKR may be selected over surgery in patients with significant medical comorbidities.

Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to provide excellent local tumor control with minimal toxicity.[34, 35]

Surgical Care

The constant principles in meningioma resection are the following: If possible, all involved or hyperostotic bone should be removed. The dura involved by the tumor as well as a dural rim that is free from tumor should be resected (duraplasty is performed). Dural tails that are apparent on MRI are best removed, even though some may not be involved with the tumor. Make a provision for harvesting a suitable dural substitute (pericranium or fascia lata). The surgeon also can use commercially available dural substitutes. If feasible, always start by coagulating the arterial feeders to the meningioma. See the images below.



View Image

Case 1: Surgical view of the tumor. The dura is opened, and the meningioma can be seen extending en plaque over the surface of the brain.



View Image

Case 1: Bone flap seen along the removed meningioma in toto.



View Image

Case 2: Intraoperative view shows the skull involvement.



View Image

Case 2: Bone flap was removed. Note tumoral breach of the dura. The dura and overlying skull were removed surgically. Duraplasty and cranioplasty were....



View Image

Case 2: Surgical specimen. Complete resection was achieved.

Surgical strategies for managing meningiomas in specific locations are discussed in the sections that follow. It should be noted that there is a significant amount of experience reported regarding surgical resection of menigiomas in their various locations and the goal of avoiding complications during and after these procedures.[36]

Convexity meningioma

Opening the scalp and skull may be bloody because of the hypertrophy of blood vessels originating from the external circulation.

The tumor may breach the sanctity of the dura and the bone, thus appearing subcutaneously.

The dural blood vessels should be coagulated before opening the dura to decrease tumor vascularity.

Usually the tumor is separated from underlying brain parenchyma by an arachnoid layer. This layer may not be complete at the depth of the tumor. In this location, separating the tumor from the brain may be difficult.

Unless the tumor is small and can be removed in 1 piece, the best strategy for excising convexity meningiomas is to find the arachnoidal plane and dissect it gently.

Placing patties circumferentially around the tumor allows quick identification of this crucial plane at a later time.

Coagulate the surface of the tumor, then core it and invaginate the outer layer to allow further circumferential dissection.

Perform dural grafting. (See the video below.)



View Video

Surgery on a 46-year-old female with a 2-cm, dural-based enhancing tumor along the left frontal convexity. The lesion was presumed to be a meningioma and showed serial enlargement on MRI, prompting the procedure. Pathology confirmed the tumor to be a WHO grade I meningioma. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Parasagittal meningiomas

These tumors may arise from the convexity and involve the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) by medial extension, or they may arise from the falx and involve the SSS by upward extension. The former subgroup is easier to treat surgically because of its superficial location.

The foremost consideration in surgically treating parasagittal meningiomas is to decide what to do with the SSS. MRV is not yet sensitive enough to confirm unequivocally the complete occlusion of the SSS.

The diagnostic test of choice is still endovascular angiography with late venous images to look for a possible delayed filling of the involved portion of the SSS. If the SSS is completely obliterated by tumor, it can be ligated safely and excised. The surgeon should be careful not to injure the veins that run anteriorly and posteriorly to the tumor. These veins may provide crucial collateral circulation for the venous drainage of the cerebrum and should be preserved at all costs.

If the SSS is only partially involved, the decision of whether to sacrifice it depends on the involved segment.

The anterior third of the SSS can usually be sacrificed with impunity; the middle third, sacrificed at times; and the posterior third, never ligated. In this author's experience, the SSS is never sacrificed beyond the anterior third.

Some surgeons resect a partially involved sinus and reconstruct it later (either with a vein or prosthetic graft).

The author's opinion is that explaining to the patient that some tumor was left behind that may need further resection at a later date is better than taking undue risk of neurological deficit by obliterating more of the SSS. If the sinus is occluded gradually by the tumor, the venous drainage will be diverted over time through parasagittal veins.

Olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningiomas

To avoid undue retraction of the frontal lobes, these tumors are best approached through a low craniotomy. This is achieved by removing the supraorbital rim.

A unilateral approach is usually sufficient. The midline burr hole should be placed just above the frontonasal suture. By entering the frontal sinus and removing the orbital rim, a low approach is provided.

To allow adequate visualization, the falx should be sectioned after ligating the most anterior aspect of the SSS. Every attempt should be made to preserve at least one of the olfactory nerves.

These tumors receive their blood supply through various sources: the ethmoidal branches of the ophthalmic arteries, branches from the middle meningeal artery, and the carotid arteries.

These tumors often invade the ethmoid sinuses and, at times, the sphenoid sinus.

Care should be taken to identify and preserve both optic nerves. Note that the usual relationship between the optic nerves and the carotid arteries might not hold true owing to displacement of these vital structures by tumor.

Tumor arterial supply and perforator arteries to the hypothalamus must be differentiated because both arise from the anterior circulation. (See the video below.)



View Video

Meningioma resection in the tuberculum sellae. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Sphenoid-wing meningiomas

Sphenoid-wing meningiomas present either as en plaque meningiomas or as globular masses.

Removing the zygoma and the orbital rim allows wider exposure of the sphenoid wing, the middle cranial fossa, the anterior cranial fossa, and the anterior clinoid.

Medial tumors may extend within the cavernous sinus.

Tentorial and torcular meningiomas

Tentorial meningiomas may be supplied by a multitude of vessels that arise from the tentorial leaf. These should be coagulated thoroughly before one attempts to remove the tumor.

A major supply may be the Bernasconi-Cassinari artery, which arises from the cavernous portion of the carotid artery and runs posteriorly to supply the tentorium.

This artery is usually not apparent on normal angiograms but may be conspicuous in angiograms of tentorial meningiomas.

A definite attempt should be made at recognizing the Bernasconi-Cassinari artery during surgery and coagulating it to decrease tumor vascularity.

Tentorial meningiomas often grow in both the infratentorial and supratentorial compartments and should be approached accordingly.

Studying the preoperative angiogram is imperative in cases of torcular meningiomas to delineate the patency of the different sinuses and the available collateral circulation. Removing these tumors completely is often impossible because of partial involvement of the venous sinuses.

Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas

In acoustic neuromas, the facial nerve usually lies anterosuperiorly to the tumor and is encountered late in surgery. This relationship is lost in cerebellopontine angle meningiomas, because the facial nerve may lie along the posterior tumor edge and can be injured early in surgery (unless care is taken to identify it).

Before attempting to remove the tumor, the surgeon should first diminish its blood supply by coagulating its supplying arteries from the dura. To do so, the interface of the tumor and the petrous bone should be followed. A partial cerebellar resection may be necessary to avoid undue retraction of the brain.

Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus

The issue of meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus is currently an area of intense interest in neurosurgery. No one doubts that, in experienced hands, such meningiomas can be treated successfully.

The debate centers on 2 points: when to operate and how aggressive the resection should be. The following opinion is a personal reflection on the matter, and diverging views may be found in the literature.

Avoid injuring the cranial nerves or the carotid artery. This author does not believe in the benefit of bypassing and resecting the cavernous carotid artery in these cases.

The surgeon should remember that a multitude of processes may affect the cavernous sinus and mimic a meningioma, including sarcoidosis and infection/inflammation that lead to the Tolosa-Hunt syndrome.

Gamma knife may be a good treatment option in parasellar meningiomas.[37]  Large tumors can be partially resected and treated with gamma knife after resection. In a report by Jensen et al, a good outcome was obtained, with an impressive 69% local tumor growth control.

Clival and petroclival meningiomas

These tumors represent some of the greatest challenges in neurosurgery; although partial resection is relatively straightforward, complete resection remains a daunting task.

Partial resection usually does not translate into any benefit for the patient and only renders further surgeries more difficult; therefore, every attempt should be made to complete the resection. If surgery has to be interrupted for logistical reasons, the second operation should be scheduled the earliest possible opportunity.

A multitude of approaches has been devised for these tumors. The traditional approaches such as the suboccipital or the subtemporal are usually insufficient to allow complete removal. More extensive approaches, such as the petrosal approach, are needed. This approach consists of combined supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomies, associated with a simple mastoidectomy down to the solid angle (ie, the bone encasing the inner ear). After the tentorium is split, the petroclival meningioma can be visualized in its entirety.

Consultations

If the patient has neurofibromatosis, the neurosurgeon may want to refer the patient for genetic counseling and for audiometric testing.

If the radiologic diagnosis is not clear cut, a detailed discussion with the radiologist should attempt to rule out other pathologic entities, such as neurofibromas or sarcomas.

In specific cases, consulting a radiation oncologist may be appropriate.

Diet

No dietary restrictions are necessary in patients with meningiomas. If the patient is on perioperative steroids, a low-salt diet is appropriate.

Activity

Patients with a meningioma who undergo surgery can resume their normal activities after an adequate period of postoperative rest (1-3 mo).

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and prevent complications.

Dexamethasone (Decadron, Dexasone)

Clinical Context:  Postulated mechanisms of action of corticosteroids in brain tumors include reduction in vascular permeability, cytotoxic effects on tumors, inhibition of tumor formation, and decreased CSF production.

Class Summary

These agents reduce edema around tumor, frequently leading to symptomatic and objective improvement in symptoms.

Further Outpatient Care

Patients who undergo operation for meningiomas should receive regular follow-up with enhanced MRI to check for possible recurrences.[38] Patients who are discharged home with antiepileptic agents should be monitored by a neurologist.

Further Inpatient Care

Before or after surgery, patients with skull-base meningiomas may have numerous disabilities, such as diplopia, dysphasia, dysphagia, or motor weakness. These problems should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach (eg, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech therapy).

Prognosis

Patients whose meningiomas are completely resected usually have an excellent prognosis.

Tumor size may play a role in determining outcome. In a study of 34 patients who underwent surgery for CPA meningiomas, Agarwal et al found that the rate of permanent cranial nerve deficits was significantly greater in patients with tumors of more than 3 cm in size than in those with smaller meningiomas (45.5% vs 5.9%, respectively). It was also found that deficits of the lower cranial nerves occurred only in patients whose tumors extended into the jugular foramen. No association was found between tumor extension into the internal acoustic canal and either postoperative complications or cranial nerve deficits. Among all patients, 5.9% suffered postoperative facial nerve palsy.[39]

The following types of meningiomas are most likely to recur: incompletely excised, malignant, or multiple tumors.

What is meningioma?What is the pathophysiology of meningioma?What is the prevalence of meningioma in the US?What is the global prevalence of meningioma?What is the mortality and morbidity associated with meningioma?What are the racial predilections of meningioma?What are the sexual predilections of meningioma?Which age groups have the highest prevalence of meningioma?Which clinical history findings are characteristic of meningioma?Which physical findings are characteristic of meningioma?What causes meningioma?What is the role of radiation in the etiology of meningiomas?What is the role of genetics in the etiology of meningiomas?Which factors increase the risk of meningioma?What are the differential diagnoses for Meningioma?Which lab tests are performed in the workup of meningioma?What is the role of imaging studies in the workup of meningioma?Which CT scan findings are characteristic of meningioma?Which MRI findings are characteristic of meningioma?What is the role of angiography in the workup of meningiomas?What is the role of endovascular embolization in the workup of meningioma?Which histologic findings are characteristic of meningioma?What is the role of immunohistochemistry in the workup of meningioma?How are meningiomas graded?How is meningioma treated?What is the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of meningioma?What is the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of meningioma?What is the role of gamma knife radiation (GKR) in the treatment of meningioma?What is the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of meningioma?How is surgery performed for the treatment of convexity meningioma?How are parasagittal meningiomas diagnosed and treated?How is surgery performed to treat olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of sphenoid-wing meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of tentorial and torcular meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of cerebellopontine angle meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of cavernous sinus meningioma?What is the role of surgery in the treatment of clival and petroclival meningioma?Which specialist consultations are beneficial to patients with meningioma?Which dietary modifications are used in the treatment of meningioma?Which activity modifications are used in the treatment of meningioma?What is the goal of drug treatment for meningioma?Which medications in the drug class Corticosteroids are used in the treatment of Meningioma?What is included in the long-term monitoring of meningioma?How are meningioma-caused disabilities treated?What is the prognosis of meningioma?

Author

Georges Haddad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ali Turkmani, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Neurosurgery, American University Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Nicholas Lorenzo, MD, MHA, CPE, Co-Founder and Former Chief Publishing Officer, eMedicine and eMedicine Health, Founding Editor-in-Chief, eMedicine Neurology; Founder and Former Chairman and CEO, Pearlsreview; Founder and CEO/CMO, PHLT Consultants; Chief Medical Officer, MeMD Inc; Chief Strategy Officer, Discourse LLC

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Tarakad S Ramachandran, MBBS, MBA, MPH, FAAN, FACP, FAHA, FRCP, FRCPC, FRS, LRCP, MRCP, MRCS, Professor Emeritus of Neurology and Psychiatry, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, Clinical Professor of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University; Neuroscience Director, Department of Neurology, Crouse Irving Memorial Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Frederick M Vincent, Sr, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University Colleges of Human and Osteopathic Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jorge C Kattah, MD, Head, Associate Program Director, Professor, Department of Neurology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthors Tarafa Baghdadi, MD and Roukoz B Chamoun, MD to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Evans DG. Neurofibromatosis type 2: genetic and clinical features. Ear Nose Throat J. 1999 Feb. 78(2):97-100. [View Abstract]
  2. Ibebuike K, Ouma J, Gopal R. Meningiomas among intracranial neoplasms in Johannesburg, South Africa: prevalence, clinical observations and review of the literature. Afr Health Sci. 2013 Mar. 13(1):118-21. [View Abstract]
  3. Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Aranda D, Barani IJ, McDermott MW, Parsa AT. Treatment decision making based on the published natural history and growth rate of small meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2010 Apr 30. [View Abstract]
  4. Pieper DR, Al-Mefty O, Hanada Y, Buechner D. Hyperostosis associated with meningioma of the cranial base: secondary changes or tumor invasion. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr. 44(4):742-6; discussion 746-7. [View Abstract]
  5. Hallinan JT, Hegde AN, Lim WE. Dilemmas and diagnostic difficulties in meningioma. Clin Radiol. 2013 Aug. 68(8):837-44. [View Abstract]
  6. Majchrzak K, Tymowski M. Surgical treatment of the tentorial and falco-tentorial junction meningiomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009 Apr. 52(2):93-7. [View Abstract]
  7. Arima T, Natsume A, Hatano H, et al. Intraventricular chordoid meningioma presenting with Castleman disease due to overproduction of interleukin-6. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2005 Apr. 102(4):733-7. [View Abstract]
  8. Ragel BT, Jensen RL, Couldwell WT. Inflammatory response and meningioma tumorigenesis and the effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Neurosurg Focus. 2007. 23(4):E7. [View Abstract]
  9. Kim JH, Lee SH, Rhee CH, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 22q and 17p correlates with aggressiveness of meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 1998 Nov. 40(2):101-6. [View Abstract]
  10. Albrecht S, Goodman JC, Rajagopolan S, Levy M, Cech DA, Cooley LD. Malignant meningioma in Gorlin's syndrome: cytogenetic and p53 gene analysis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1994 Sep. 81(3):466-71. [View Abstract]
  11. Verstegen MJ, van den Munckhof P, Troost D, Bouma GJ. Multiple meningiomas in a patient with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan. 102(1):167-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Hao S, Smith TW, Chu PG, et al. The oncofetal protein IMP3: a novel molecular marker to predict aggressive meningioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Aug. 135(8):1032-6. [View Abstract]
  13. Niedermaier T, Behrens G, Schmid D, Schlecht I, Fischer B, Leitzmann MF. Body mass index, physical activity, and risk of adult meningioma and glioma: A meta-analysis. Neurology. 2015 Oct 13. 85 (15):1342-50. [View Abstract]
  14. Hughes, S. Overweight and Lack of Exercise Linked to Meningioma. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/851300. September 22, 2015; Accessed: December 7, 2015.
  15. Milham S. Meningioma and mobile phone use. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug. 39(4):1117; author reply 1119. [View Abstract]
  16. Lee JW, Kang KW, Park SH, et al. 18F-FDG PET in the assessment of tumor grade and prediction of tumor recurrence in intracranial meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Oct. 36(10):1574-82. [View Abstract]
  17. Abdel Kerim A, Bonneville F, Jean B, Cornu P, LeJean L, Chiras J. Balloon-assisted embolization of skull base meningioma with liquid embolic agent. J Neurosurg. 2010 Jan. 112(1):70-2. [View Abstract]
  18. Zielinski G, Grala B, Koziarski A, Kozlowski W. Skull base secretory meningioma. Value of histological and immunohistochemical findings for peritumoral brain edema formation. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013 Apr 5. 34(2):111-117. [View Abstract]
  19. Wang S, Yang W, Deng J, Zhang J, Ma F, Wang J. Correlation between 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide SPECT/CT somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and pathological grading of meningioma. J Neurooncol. 2013 Jul. 113(3):519-26. [View Abstract]
  20. Rosenberg LA, Prayson RA, Lee J, Reddy C, Chao ST, Barnett GH, et al. Long-term experience with World Health Organization grade III (malignant) meningiomas at a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1. 74(2):427-32. [View Abstract]
  21. Wang DJ, Zheng MZ, Gong Y, et al. Papillary meningioma: clinical and histopathological observations. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013. 6(5):878-88. [View Abstract]
  22. Dutta D, Lee HN, Munshi A, et al. Intracerebral cystic rhabdoid meningioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Aug. 16(8):1073-4. [View Abstract]
  23. Zhou K, Wang G, Wang Y, Jin H, Yang S, Liu C. The potential involvement of E-cadherin and beta-catenins in meningioma. PLoS One. 2010. 5(6):e11231. [View Abstract]
  24. Lakhdar F, Arkha Y, El Ouahabi A, et al. Intracranial meningioma in children: different from adult forms? A series of 21 cases. Neurochirurgie. 2010 Aug. 56(4):309-14. [View Abstract]
  25. Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY. Advances in meningioma therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009 May. 9(3):231-40. [View Abstract]
  26. Chamberlain MC, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S. Temozolomide for treatment-resistant recurrent meningioma. Neurology. 2004 Apr 13. 62(7):1210-2. [View Abstract]
  27. Milker-Zabel S, Huber P, Schlegel W, Debus J, Zabel-du Bois A. Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in the management of primary optic nerve sheath meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2009 Sep. 94(3):419-24. [View Abstract]
  28. Haase D, Schmidl S, Ewald C, Kalff R, Huebner C, Firsching R, et al. Fatty acid synthase as a novel target for meningioma therapy. Neuro Oncol. 2010 Aug. 12(8):844-54. [View Abstract]
  29. Oya S, Kim SH, Sade B, Lee JH. The natural history of intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2011 May. 114(5):1250-6. [View Abstract]
  30. Smith JL, Vuksanovic MM, Yates BM, Bienfang DC. Radiation therapy for primary optic nerve meninigiomas. J Clin Neuroph. 1981. 1:85-99. [View Abstract]
  31. Mirimanoff RO. New radiotherapy technologies for meningiomas: 3D conformal radiotherapy? Radiosurgery? Stereotactic radiotherapy? Intensity-modulated radiotherapy? Proton beam radiotherapy? Spot scanning proton radiation therapy. . or nothing at all?. Radiother Oncol. 2004 Jun. 71(3):247-9. [View Abstract]
  32. Nutting C, Brada M, Brazil L, et al. Radiotherapy in the treatment of benign meningioma of the skull base. J Neurosurg. 1999 May. 90(5):823-7. [View Abstract]
  33. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Iizuka H, Ishii D, Yoshida K. Gamma Knife surgery for convexity, parasagittal, and falcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2011 May. 114(5):1392-8. [View Abstract]
  34. Kondziolka D, Levy EI, Niranjan A, et al. Long-term outcomes after meningioma radiosurgery: physician and patient perspectives. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul. 91(1):44-50. [View Abstract]
  35. Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1999 Apr. 10(2):317-25. [View Abstract]
  36. Magill ST, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW. Resection of falx and parasagittal meningioma: complication avoidance. J Neurooncol. 2016 Nov. 130 (2):253-262. [View Abstract]
  37. Williams BJ, Yen CP, Starke RM, et al. Gamma Knife surgery for parasellar meningiomas: long-term results including complications, predictive factors, and progression-free survival. J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun. 114(6):1571-7. [View Abstract]
  38. Strassner C, Buhl R, Mehdorn HM. Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: did better methods of diagnosis and surgical treatment change the outcome in the last 30 years?. Neurol Res. 2009 Jun. 31(5):478-82. [View Abstract]
  39. Agarwal V, Babu R, Grier J, et al. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas: postoperative outcomes in a modern cohort. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Dec. 35(6):E10. [View Abstract]
  40. Al-Mefty O, Smith R. Clival and petroclival meningiomas. Al-Mefty O, ed. Meningiomas. New York, NY: Raven; 1991.
  41. Alexiou GA, Vartholomatos G, Tsiouris S, et al. Evaluation of meningioma aggressiveness by (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin SPECT. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008 Jul. 110(7):645-8. [View Abstract]
  42. Black P, Kathiresan S, Chung W. Meningioma surgery in the elderly: a case-control study assessing morbidity and mortality. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998. 140(10):1013-6; discussion 1016-7. [View Abstract]
  43. Cappabianca P, Cirillo S, Alfieri A, et al. Pituitary macroadenoma and diaphragma sellae meningioma: differential diagnosis on MRI. Neuroradiology. 1999 Jan. 41(1):22-6. [View Abstract]
  44. De Monte F, Al-Mefty O. Meningiomas. Kaye AH, Laws ER, eds. Brain Tumors: An Encyclopedic Approach. Ediburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1995: 675-704.
  45. Drummond KJ, Zhu JJ, Black PM. Meningiomas: updating basic science, management, and outcome. Neurologist. 2004 May. 10(3):113-30. [View Abstract]
  46. Feldman RP, Marcovici A, Suarez M, Goodrich JT. Foreign body granuloma mimicking intracranial meningioma: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr. 44(4):855-8. [View Abstract]
  47. Haddad GF, Al-Mefty O. Approaches to petroclival tumors. Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, eds. Neurosurgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996. Vol 2: 1695-706.
  48. Haddad GF, Al-Mefty O. Meningiomas: an overview. Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, eds. Neurosurgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996. Vol 1: 833-42.
  49. Haddad GF, Al-Mefty O. The road less traveled: transtemporal access to the CPA. Clinical Neurosurgery. 1994. 41:150-167.
  50. Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Yasui T, et al. Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. The effectiveness of low-dose treatment. Surg Neurol. 1999 Jul. 52(1):40-4; discussion 44-5. [View Abstract]
  51. Jaffrain-Rea ML, Minniti G, Santoro A, et al. Visual improvement during octreotide therapy in a case of episellar meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1998 Mar. 100(1):40-3. [View Abstract]
  52. Kleihues P, Cavanee W. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon, France: IARC; 2000.
  53. Klutmann S, Bohuslavizki KH, Tietje N, et al. Clinical value of 24-hour delayed imaging in somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for meningioma. J Nucl Med. 1999 Aug. 40(8):1246-51. [View Abstract]
  54. Kotzen RM, Swanson RM, Milhorat TH, Boockvar JA. Post-traumatic meningioma: case report and historical perspective. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Jun. 66(6):796, 798. [View Abstract]
  55. Larner AJ, Ball JA, Howard RS. Sarcoid tumour: continuing diagnostic problems in the MRI era. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Apr. 66(4):510-2. [View Abstract]
  56. Lee GK, Coel M, Ko J, Tom B. Two meningiomas detected incidentally by Tc-99m HDP bone scintigraphy during a work-up for breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 1999 Jul. 24(7):525-6. [View Abstract]
  57. Liu M, Liu Y, Li X, Zhu S, Wu C. Cystic meninigioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Sep. 14(9):856-9. [View Abstract]
  58. Lusis E, Gutmann DH. Meningioma: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004 Dec. 17(6):687-92. [View Abstract]
  59. Nakasu S, Nakasu Y, Nakajima M, et al. Preoperative identification of meningiomas that are highly likely to recur. J Neurosurg. 1999 Mar. 90(3):455-62. [View Abstract]
  60. Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY. Targeted drug therapy for meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2007. 23(4):E12. [View Abstract]
  61. Perry A, et al. Meningiomas. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 164-172.
  62. Rempel SA, Ge S, Gutierrez JA. SPARC: a potential diagnostic marker of invasive meningiomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Feb. 5(2):237-41. [View Abstract]
  63. Runzi MW, Jaspers C, Windeck R. Successful treatment of meningioma with octreotide [letter]. Lancet. 1989 May 13. 1(8646):1074. [View Abstract]
  64. Sharif S, Brennan P, Rawluk D. Non-surgical treatment of meningioma: a case report and review. Br J Neurosurg. 1998 Aug. 12(4):369-72. [View Abstract]
  65. Vaicys C, Schulder M, Wolansky LJ, Fromowitz FB. Falcotentorial plasmacytoma: case report. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul. 91(1):132-5. [View Abstract]
  66. Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D. Meningiomas. Lancet. 2004 May 8. 363(9420):1535-43. [View Abstract]

Case 1: Surgical view of the tumor. The dura is opened, and the meningioma can be seen extending en plaque over the surface of the brain.

Case 1: MRI of a meningioma on plaque.

Case 1: Bone-window CT reveals calcification of the meningioma.

Case 1: MRI of a meningioma on plaque.

Case 1: Bone-window CT reveals calcification of the meningioma.

Case 2: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of a meningioma invading the overlying dura and bone. Compare with appearance in Case 1.

Case 2: Bone-window CT scan reveals the skull involvement. Note the absence of tumoral calcification.

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows the enhancing meningioma. Transverse T1-weighted MRIs shows isointensity of the tumor compared with the surrounding brain (B) and its homogenous enhancement (C). Coronal (D), coronal enhanced (E), and sagittal enhanced (F) T1-weighted MRIs. Posterior circulation angiograms show tumoral blush (arrow in G) and the Bernasconi-Cassinari artery (arrow in H).

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI immediately (A) and 2 years after surgery (B-D). Transverse images show posterior (arrow in B) and anterior (arrow in C) recurrence involving the tentorium. Sagittal images show posterior (D) and anterior (E) recurrence involving the tentorium. Lower vignette reveals complete excision of the recurrence after a second operation.

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma A, Pathology showed syncytial meningioma. Note hypercellularity and minimal whorling (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X400). B, MRI performed 4 years after the first operation reveals a recurrence over the posterior tentorium. C, Two-dimensional planning for stereotactic radiosurgery. Three recurrences lie in the plane of the tentorium on a single line. D, Three-dimensional planning for stereotactic radiosurgery. Three arcs were used to irradiate the largest recurrence.

Case 4: Recurrent subcutaneous meningioma. A, Patient underwent surgery for a parieto-occipital meningioma in 1978. She was lost to follow-up until 1996, when this transverse T2-weighted MRI was obtained. Arrow indicates surgical bed of the resected meningioma. B, Although the initial surgical bed is tumor-free, sagittal T2-weighted MRI shows a large subcutaneous recurrence. C, Lower transverse section also shows recurrence. Note variegated appearance of the tumor. D, Transverse section at a lower level. Postoperative sagittal (E) and transverse (F, G) enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows gross total removal of the tumor. H and I, Tumoral recurrence 3 months after surgery, at the same level as in G and F, respectively. Patient received repeat surgery for subtotal removal of the tumor; a pediculated subcutaneous flap was used to close the surgical defect. After surgery, patient received conventional radiotherapy.

Case 5: Bilateral olfactory meningioma invading the facial sinuses. Coronal (A), transverse (B), and sagittal (C) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows bilateral olfactory meningiomas, and the falx dividing the tumor in 2. Arrow indicates tumor invasion of the sinuses. D, Postoperative enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows that the tumor was completely removed by means of craniotomy and a transfacial approach. E, Tumor was first approached intracranially. Enhanced T1-weighted MRI reveals complete excision of the intracranial component. Arrow indicates residual in the sinuses. F, Residual was completely excised by means a transfacial approach performed with the otolaryngology team.

Case 6: Subfrontal meningioma in a patient with abnormal behavior. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan clearly shows bilateral subfrontal meningioma. B, Transverse T1-weighted MRI of same lesion. C, Intense gadolinium enhancement of the tumor. Coronal (D) and sagittal (E) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRIs. F, Anterior circulation angiogram reveals posterior displacement of the anterior cerebral artery by tumor. G, Postoperative MRI shows complete removal of the tumor. H-I, Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification X100 in H, X400 in I) show syncytial meningioma with well-identified whorls and no psammoma bodies.

Case 7: Parasagittal meningioma invading the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). A, Sagittal T1-weighted MRI shows a meningioma (arrow). B, T2-weighted MRI. Note midline shift and tumoral invasion of the skull (arrow). C, Transverse T2-weighted MRI. D, Angiogram shows invasion of the SSS, which remains patent. Sagittal (E, G), transverse (F) postoperative T1-weighted MRI. H, Gadolinium-enhanced postoperative T1-weighted MRI shows residual tumor, which was intentionally left to preserve patency of the SSS. I, Pathology slide (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X100) shows a highly vascular syncytial meningioma.

This is an extra-axial tumor. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and astrocytoma are intraparenchymal tumors, and GBM enhances in a variegated fashion. Acoustic schwannomas are seen in the posterior fossa but not in this location. Fibrous dysplasia involves the skull but does not cause this amount of compression.

Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification X400 in A-B, X100 in C-D). A, Fibroblastic meningioma (arrowheads) abutting the dura (arrow). B, Psammomatous meningioma (arrow indicates psammoma body). C, Meningothelial meningioma, tumor in case 4. E, Meningioma with marked vascularity (arrowheads indicate meningioma cluster; arrow, vessel wall).

Case 4: Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X400). A, Meningioma with malignant features, as evinced by prominent nucleoli (yellow dot) and mitoses (arrows). B, Intranuclear cytoplasmic intrusion (pseudoinclusion).

Case 1: Surgical view of the tumor. The dura is opened, and the meningioma can be seen extending en plaque over the surface of the brain.

Case 1: Bone flap seen along the removed meningioma in toto.

Case 2: Intraoperative view shows the skull involvement.

Case 2: Bone flap was removed. Note tumoral breach of the dura. The dura and overlying skull were removed surgically. Duraplasty and cranioplasty were performed

Case 2: Surgical specimen. Complete resection was achieved.

Surgery on a 46-year-old female with a 2-cm, dural-based enhancing tumor along the left frontal convexity. The lesion was presumed to be a meningioma and showed serial enlargement on MRI, prompting the procedure. Pathology confirmed the tumor to be a WHO grade I meningioma. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Meningioma resection in the tuberculum sellae. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Case 1: MRI of a meningioma on plaque.

Case 1: Bone-window CT reveals calcification of the meningioma.

Case 1: Surgical view of the tumor. The dura is opened, and the meningioma can be seen extending en plaque over the surface of the brain.

Case 1: Bone flap seen along the removed meningioma in toto.

Case 2: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of a meningioma invading the overlying dura and bone. Compare with appearance in Case 1.

Case 2: Bone-window CT scan reveals the skull involvement. Note the absence of tumoral calcification.

Case 2: Intraoperative view shows the skull involvement.

Case 2: Bone flap was removed. Note tumoral breach of the dura. The dura and overlying skull were removed surgically. Duraplasty and cranioplasty were performed

Case 2: Surgical specimen. Complete resection was achieved.

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows the enhancing meningioma. Transverse T1-weighted MRIs shows isointensity of the tumor compared with the surrounding brain (B) and its homogenous enhancement (C). Coronal (D), coronal enhanced (E), and sagittal enhanced (F) T1-weighted MRIs. Posterior circulation angiograms show tumoral blush (arrow in G) and the Bernasconi-Cassinari artery (arrow in H).

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI immediately (A) and 2 years after surgery (B-D). Transverse images show posterior (arrow in B) and anterior (arrow in C) recurrence involving the tentorium. Sagittal images show posterior (D) and anterior (E) recurrence involving the tentorium. Lower vignette reveals complete excision of the recurrence after a second operation.

Case 3: Tentorial meningioma A, Pathology showed syncytial meningioma. Note hypercellularity and minimal whorling (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X400). B, MRI performed 4 years after the first operation reveals a recurrence over the posterior tentorium. C, Two-dimensional planning for stereotactic radiosurgery. Three recurrences lie in the plane of the tentorium on a single line. D, Three-dimensional planning for stereotactic radiosurgery. Three arcs were used to irradiate the largest recurrence.

Case 4: Recurrent subcutaneous meningioma. A, Patient underwent surgery for a parieto-occipital meningioma in 1978. She was lost to follow-up until 1996, when this transverse T2-weighted MRI was obtained. Arrow indicates surgical bed of the resected meningioma. B, Although the initial surgical bed is tumor-free, sagittal T2-weighted MRI shows a large subcutaneous recurrence. C, Lower transverse section also shows recurrence. Note variegated appearance of the tumor. D, Transverse section at a lower level. Postoperative sagittal (E) and transverse (F, G) enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows gross total removal of the tumor. H and I, Tumoral recurrence 3 months after surgery, at the same level as in G and F, respectively. Patient received repeat surgery for subtotal removal of the tumor; a pediculated subcutaneous flap was used to close the surgical defect. After surgery, patient received conventional radiotherapy.

Case 5: Bilateral olfactory meningioma invading the facial sinuses. Coronal (A), transverse (B), and sagittal (C) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows bilateral olfactory meningiomas, and the falx dividing the tumor in 2. Arrow indicates tumor invasion of the sinuses. D, Postoperative enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows that the tumor was completely removed by means of craniotomy and a transfacial approach. E, Tumor was first approached intracranially. Enhanced T1-weighted MRI reveals complete excision of the intracranial component. Arrow indicates residual in the sinuses. F, Residual was completely excised by means a transfacial approach performed with the otolaryngology team.

Case 6: Subfrontal meningioma in a patient with abnormal behavior. A, Contrast-enhanced CT scan clearly shows bilateral subfrontal meningioma. B, Transverse T1-weighted MRI of same lesion. C, Intense gadolinium enhancement of the tumor. Coronal (D) and sagittal (E) gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRIs. F, Anterior circulation angiogram reveals posterior displacement of the anterior cerebral artery by tumor. G, Postoperative MRI shows complete removal of the tumor. H-I, Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification X100 in H, X400 in I) show syncytial meningioma with well-identified whorls and no psammoma bodies.

Case 7: Parasagittal meningioma invading the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). A, Sagittal T1-weighted MRI shows a meningioma (arrow). B, T2-weighted MRI. Note midline shift and tumoral invasion of the skull (arrow). C, Transverse T2-weighted MRI. D, Angiogram shows invasion of the SSS, which remains patent. Sagittal (E, G), transverse (F) postoperative T1-weighted MRI. H, Gadolinium-enhanced postoperative T1-weighted MRI shows residual tumor, which was intentionally left to preserve patency of the SSS. I, Pathology slide (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X100) shows a highly vascular syncytial meningioma.

Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification X400 in A-B, X100 in C-D). A, Fibroblastic meningioma (arrowheads) abutting the dura (arrow). B, Psammomatous meningioma (arrow indicates psammoma body). C, Meningothelial meningioma, tumor in case 4. E, Meningioma with marked vascularity (arrowheads indicate meningioma cluster; arrow, vessel wall).

Case 4: Pathology slides (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X400). A, Meningioma with malignant features, as evinced by prominent nucleoli (yellow dot) and mitoses (arrows). B, Intranuclear cytoplasmic intrusion (pseudoinclusion).

This is an extra-axial tumor. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and astrocytoma are intraparenchymal tumors, and GBM enhances in a variegated fashion. Acoustic schwannomas are seen in the posterior fossa but not in this location. Fibrous dysplasia involves the skull but does not cause this amount of compression.

Surgery on a 46-year-old female with a 2-cm, dural-based enhancing tumor along the left frontal convexity. The lesion was presumed to be a meningioma and showed serial enlargement on MRI, prompting the procedure. Pathology confirmed the tumor to be a WHO grade I meningioma. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Meningioma resection in the tuberculum sellae. Video courtesy of Anand I. Rughani, MD, and Jeffrey E. Florman, MD.

Location Symptoms
ParasagittalMonoparesis of the contralateral leg
SubfrontalChange in mentation, apathy or disinhibited behavior, urinary incontinence
Olfactory grooveAnosmia with possible ipsilateral optic atrophy and contralateral papilledema (this triad termed Kennedy-Foster syndrome)
Cavernous sinusMultiple cranial nerve deficits (II, III, IV, V, VI), leading to decreased vision and diplopia with associated facial numbness
Occipital lobeContralateral hemianopsia
Cerebellopontine angleDecreased hearing with possible facial weakness and facial numbness
Spinal cordLocalized spinal pain, Brown-Sequard (hemispinal cord) syndrome
Optic nerveExophthalmos, monocular loss of vision or blindness, ipsilateral dilated pupil that does not react to direct light stimulation but might contract on consensual light stimulation; often, monocular optic nerve swelling with optociliary shunt vessels
Sphenoid wingSeizures; multiple cranial nerve palsies if the superior orbital fissure involved
TentorialMay protrude within supratentorial and infratentorial compartments, producing symptoms by compressing specific structures within these 2 compartments[6]
Foramen magnumParaparesis, sphincteric troubles, tongue atrophy associated with fasciculation
WHO Grade Histological Subtype Histological Features
IMeningothelial, fibroblastic, transitional, angiomatous, microcystic, secretory, lymphoplasmacytic metaplastic, psammomatousDoes not fulfill criteria for grade II or III
II (Atypical)Chordoid, clear cell4 or more mitotic cells per 10 hpf and/or 3 or more of the following: increased cellularity, small cells, necrosis, prominent nucleoli, sheeting, and/or brain invasion in an otherwise Grade I tumor
III (Anaplastic)Papillary, rhabdoid[22] 20 or more mitoses per 10 hpf and/or obviously malignant cytological characteristics such that tumor cell resembles carcinoma, sarcoma, or melanoma