Map-dot-fingerprint Dystrophy

Back

Background

Corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is by far the most common corneal dystrophy and is named for the appearance of its characteristic slit-lamp findings. Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is also known as epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, anterior basement membrane dystrophy, and Cogan microcystic epithelial dystrophy.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Historically, corneal dystrophies are usually described as hereditary, bilateral, progressive, and not associated with systemic or local disease. However, in most cases, map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is sporadic and may be a degenerative rather than familial condition.[6] Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is also not progressive but rather variable and fluctuating in its course. Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is usually bilateral, but it can be unilateral or very asymmetric in presentation.[7]

According to the International Committee for Classification of Corneal Diseases (IC3D), corneal dystrophies are still classified by the anatomic layer of corneal involvement, but they are increasingly defined on a genetic basis. Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy was reclassified in 2015 as a degenerative condition in the majority of cases, with rare cases considered hereditary and class 1 ("a well-defined corneal dystrophy in which the gene has been mapped and identified and the specific mutations are known").[8] Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy has been associated in several families with a presumed autosomal-dominant pattern attributed to the TGFBI gene, locus 5q31.[9, 10, 11]

Pathophysiology

The corneal epithelium produces and adheres to its underlying basement membrane. Corneal abnormalities associated with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy are the result of a faulty basement membrane, which is thickened, multilaminar, and misdirected into the epithelium.[12] Deeper epithelial cells that normally migrate to the surface can become trapped. Epithelial cells anterior to aberrant basement membrane may have difficulty forming viable hemidesmosomes and basement membrane complexes, which attach to the underlying stroma, resulting in recurrent erosions. Irregular epithelium centrally can cause decreased vision.

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Estimates of the prevalence of map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy range from 2-43% of the general population.[13] Of patients with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, 10-33% have recurrent corneal erosions. As many as 50% of patients with recurrent corneal erosions have map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy.[14, 15]

Mortality/Morbidity

Patients with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy may be asymptomatic. Others experience painful recurrent erosions, decreased vision, or both.

Sex

This condition is slightly more common in females than in males.

Age

This condition is uncommon in children.

Prognosis

Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy findings may fluctuate but tend not to progress over time. Most patients are able to maintain sufficient vision and comfort for reading, driving, and other visual tasks, except during episodes of corneal erosions.

History

Most patients with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy are asymptomatic.

The past eye history may be positive for recurrent corneal erosions.

Visual symptoms are usually mild and occasionally debilitating. Vision is variable and fluctuating due to migratory and intermittent corneal involvement. Refractions often are unstable and are not the fault of the doctor or the patient. Visual complaints include the following:

Pain symptoms include the following:

Physical

Visual acuity among patients with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy ranges from 20/15 to 20/200.

Refraction may have an uncertain endpoint due to irregular astigmatism.

On slit lamp examination, pathology is at the epithelial and basement membrane levels. Areas of pathology often are identified best by broad-beam illumination, fluorescein with cobalt blue light (to identify areas of negative staining), or retroillumination following dilation. Slit lamp findings include the following:

Keratometry or computerized topography can be used to check for irregular astigmatism. A Placido disk or keratometer often demonstrates irregularity better than computerized topography.

Histologic Findings

The corneal maps in map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy histologically represent areas of multilaminar basement membrane, which extend into the epithelium. The corneal dots in map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy are intraepithelial microcysts that contain nuclear, cytoplasmic, and lipid debris. The corneal fingerprints in map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy are curvilinear clusters of reduplicated and thickened basement membrane and fibrillogranular material.[17, 12]

Blebs, a less common manifestation of map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, are localized areas of fibrillogranular material or thickened basement membrane.

Medical Care

Numerous treatment options are available, and like map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy itself, results are variable and differ from patient to patient.[18]

Hypertonic drops or ointment often are the first line of treatment. They may help both irregular astigmatism and recurrent corneal erosion problems. Sodium chloride (5%) drops at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and ointment at bedtime are recommended.

Nonhypertonic lubricating drops or ointment may be used; the only prospective study to date detected no difference in the results of bland versus hypertonic lubricating treatment.[19]

Consider patching for acute episodes of associated corneal erosions.

Bandage extended-wear soft contact lenses may be useful, but the risk of infectious keratitis makes this a secondary choice.

Hard or gas-permeable contact lenses, including scleral lenses, may improve vision by masking corneal irregular astigmatism, but they are often poorly tolerated because of increased corneal fragility/erosion problems.

Surgical Care

Indications for surgical treatment of corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy include decreased vision or discomfort, including recurrent corneal erosion syndrome, that does not respond to medical treatment as outlined above. Another common indication for surgical treatment is the need for a smooth and stable corneal surface prior to undergoing cataract surgery to maximize intraocular lens calculation accuracy.

Debridement/superficial keratectomy is preferred by this author, for both significant visual loss from associated irregular astigmatism and recurrent corneal erosions, if treatment with hypertonic drops and ointment fails. Combined debridement and superficial keratectomy can be completed easily in the office setting, at the slit lamp, using topical proparacaine or a similar anesthetic drop. Place a lid speculum, then debride (with a rather blunt Kimura spatula) the entire extent of any loosely adherent epithelium or basement membrane level opacities. With sweeping and pushing motions, using the trailing or leading edges of the instrument, keeping nearly parallel to the corneal plane, redundant basement membrane level material can be massaged away, while maintaining the integrity of the Bowman layer.[20, 21]

Diamond burr superficial keratectomy is very useful for recurrent erosions associated with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy that does not respond to keratectomy with a Kimura spatula. Following epithelial debridement, a 4- or 5-mm diameter diamond-dusted burr very gently is used to polish the basement membrane throughout the area of epithelial debridement.[22, 23]

Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy is an alternative treatment for recurrent corneal erosions associated with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, with results similar to the above-described superficial keratectomy procedures (but much more expensive in most settings). Ablation should not extend more than 10 micrometers beyond the debrided epithelium, as an undesired hyperopic shift can occur.[24, 25, 26, 27]

Corneal anterior stromal needle puncture is useful for recurrent corneal erosions from trauma that recur in the same location.[28] This procedure is not as successful for recurrent erosions associated with map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, which is usually more diffuse and often migratory.

Prevention

Lubricating hypertonic saline or bland ointment at bedtime is often helpful to prevent recurrent erosions.

Guidelines Summary

Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy is a significant contraindication to laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery owing to poorly adherent epithelium predisposing to epithelial defects, interface epithelial ingrowth, and increased risk of flap keratolysis and corneal scarring.[29, 30, 31] For patients undergoing refractive surgery, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a better choice than LASIK.

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications.

Sodium chloride hypertonic, ophthalmic (Muro 128, AK-NaCl)

Clinical Context:  Used for temporary relief of corneal edema. May improve corneal epithelial adhesion and irregular corneal astigmatism.

Class Summary

Create osmotic gradient that draws water out of the cornea.

Author

David D Verdier, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Christopher J Rapuano, MD, Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University; Director of the Cornea Service, Co-Director of Refractive Surgery Department, Wills Eye Hospital

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cornea Society, AAO, OMIC, Avedro; Bio-Tissue; GSK, Kala, Novartis; Shire; Sun Ophthalmics; TearLab<br/>Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Avedro; Bio-Tissue; Shire<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: AAO, OMIC, Avedro; Bio-Tissue; GSK, Kala, Novartis; Shire; Sun Ophthalmics; TearLab.

Chief Editor

Hampton Roy, Sr, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Fernando H Murillo-Lopez, MD, Senior Surgeon, Unidad Privada de Oftalmologia CEMES

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Cogan DG, Donaldson DD, Kuwabara T, et al. Microcystic dystrophy of the corneal epithelium. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1964. 62:213-25. [View Abstract]
  2. Cogan DG, Kuwabara T, Donaldson DD, et al. Microcystic dystrophy of the cornea. A partial explanation for its pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974 Dec. 92(6):470-4. [View Abstract]
  3. Guerry D 3rd. Observations on Cogan's microcystic dystrophy of the corneal epithelium. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1965. 63:320-34. [View Abstract]
  4. Waring GO 3rd, Rodrigues MM, Laibson PR. Corneal dystrophies. I. Dystrophies of the epithelium, Bowman's layer and stroma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1978 Sep-Oct. 23(2):71-122. [View Abstract]
  5. Trobe JD, Laibson PR. Dystrophic changes in the anterior cornea. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972 Apr. 87(4):378-82. [View Abstract]
  6. Laibson PR, Krachmer JH. Familial occurrence of dot (microcystic), map, fingerprint dystrophy of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 May. 14(5):397-9. [View Abstract]
  7. Rodrigues MM, Fine BS, Laibson PR, et al. Disorders of the corneal epithelium. A clinicopathologic study of dot, geographic, and fingerprint patterns. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974 Dec. 92(6):475-82. [View Abstract]
  8. Weiss JS, Moller HU, Aldave AJ, Seitz B, et al. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies--edition 2. Cornea. 2015. 34(2):117-159.
  9. Boutboul S, Black GC, Moore JE, et al. A subset of patients with epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy have mutations in TGFBI/BIGH3. Hum Mutat. 2006 Jun. 27(6):553-7. [View Abstract]
  10. Evans CJ, Davidson AE, Carnt N, Rojas López KE, Veli N, Thaung CM, et al. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation for TGFBI Corneal Dystrophies Identifies p.(G623D) as a Novel Cause of Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1. 57 (13):5407-5414. [View Abstract]
  11. McKusick, VA. Corneal dystrophy, epithelial basement membrane; EBMD. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Available at https://www.omim.org/entry/121820. September 17, 2015;
  12. Wood TO, Griffith ME. Corneal epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1987. 85:281-92. [View Abstract]
  13. Werblin TP, Hirst LW, Stark WJ, et al. Prevalence of map-dot-fingerprint changes in the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981 Jun. 65(6):401-9. [View Abstract]
  14. Reidy JJ, Paulus MP, Gona S. Recurrent erosions of the cornea: epidemiology and treatment. Cornea. 2000 Nov. 19(6):767-71. [View Abstract]
  15. Brown N, Bron A. Recurrent erosion of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976 Feb. 60 (2):84-96. [View Abstract]
  16. Guerry D III. Fingerprint-like lines in the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 1950. 33:724-726.
  17. Akhtar S, Bron AJ, Meek KM, et al. Clinical and ultrastructural findings in mare's tail lines of the corneal epithelium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul. 88(7):864-7. [View Abstract]
  18. Seitz B, Lisch W. Stage-related therapy of corneal dystrophies. Dev Ophthalmol. 2011. 48:116-53. [View Abstract]
  19. Hykin PG, Foss AE, Pavesio C, Dart JK. The natural history and management of recurrent corneal erosion: a prospective randomised trial. Eye (Lond). 1994. 8 ( Pt 1):35-40. [View Abstract]
  20. Buxton JN, Constad WH. Superficial epithelial keratectomy in the treatment of epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Cornea. 1987. 6(4):292-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Itty S, Hamilton SS, Baratz KH, et al. Outcomes of epithelial debridement for anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug. 144(2):217-221. [View Abstract]
  22. Forstot SL, et al. Diamond burr keratectomy for the treatment of recurrent corneal erosion syndrome. Ophthalmol Suppl: Poster. 1994.
  23. Soong HK, Farjo Q, Meyer RF, et al. Diamond burr superficial keratectomy for recurrent corneal erosions. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar. 86(3):296-8. [View Abstract]
  24. Ohman L, Fagerholm P, Tengroth B. Treatment of recurrent corneal erosions with the excimer laser. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Aug. 72(4):461-3. [View Abstract]
  25. Orndahl MJ, Fagerholm PP. Phototherapeutic keratectomy for map-dot-fingerprint corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 1998 Nov. 17(6):595-9. [View Abstract]
  26. Sridhar MS, Rapuano CJ, Cosar CB, et al. Phototherapeutic keratectomy versus diamond burr polishing of Bowman's membrane in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions associated with anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr. 109(4):674-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Pogorelov P, Langenbucher A, Kruse F, Seitz B. Long-term results of phototherapeutic keratectomy for corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy (Cogan-Guerry). Cornea. 2006 Aug. 25 (7):774-7. [View Abstract]
  28. McLean EN, MacRae SM, Rich LF. Recurrent erosion. Treatment by anterior stromal puncture. Ophthalmology. 1986 Jun. 93(6):784-8. [View Abstract]
  29. Dastgheib KA, Clinch TE, Manche EE, et al. Sloughing of corneal epithelium and wound healing complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep. 130(3):297-303. [View Abstract]
  30. Rezende RA, Uchoa UC, Cohen EJ, et al. Complications associated with anterior basement membrane dystrophy after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov. 30(11):2328-31. [View Abstract]
  31. Kenyon KR, Paz H, Greiner JV, et al. Corneal epithelial adhesion abnormalities associated with LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan. 111(1):11-7. [View Abstract]
  32. Paliwal P, Sharma A, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Sen S, et al. TGFBI mutation screening and genotype-phenotype correlation in north Indian patients with corneal dystrophies. Mol Vis. 2010 Jul 29. 16:1429-38. [View Abstract]

Corneal maps. Best seen with broad illumination beam.

Corneal dots. Cluster of corneal dots.

Corneal fingerprints. Best seen in retroillumination.

Pseudofingerprints (shift lines) in a patient with Fuchs corneal dystrophy.

Corneal maps. Best seen with broad illumination beam.

Corneal dots. Cluster of corneal dots.

Corneal fingerprints. Best seen in retroillumination.

Pseudofingerprints (shift lines) in a patient with Fuchs corneal dystrophy.