Pellucid Marginal Degeneration (PMD)

Back

Background

Pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) is a bilateral, noninflammatory, peripheral corneal thinning disorder characterized by a peripheral band of thinning of the inferior cornea. The cornea in and adjacent to the thinned area is ectatic. Schalaeppi first coined the term pellucid marginal degeneration in 1957.

Pathophysiology

The etiology of pellucid marginal degeneration has not been clearly established, but collagen abnormalities, as seen in keratoconus, have been reported. The thinned and presumably weakened cornea may protrude as a result of the positive intraocular pressure. The corneal area between the thinned band‑like region and the limbus is characterized by the absence of lipid deposition, scarring, or vascularization and is typically epithelialized. The degree of thinning of the cornea can be severe resulting in up to 80% stromal tissue loss[1, 2, 3]

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Pellucid marginal degeneration is rare, and the exact incidence and prevalence are unknown. However, the incidence may be considerably underestimated, as this condition often is misdiagnosed as keratoconus.

India

Das et al published a multicenter study with an 8 year follow up and they found that the overall prevalence of PMD was 0.02% of all eye diseases diagnosed between 2012 and 2020. They compared the incidence in the diagnosis of Keratocous in the same period, and found that it was 0.62%, which is 31 times more common than PMD. [4]

Mortality/Morbidity

Deterioration of visual function results from the irregular astigmatism induced by asymmetric distortion of the cornea. The deterioration in visual function commonly is severe.

Refractive surgery, such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), can cause severe corneal haze, and results with laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are unpredictable.

Race

No racial preponderance has been identified for pellucid marginal degeneration.

Sex

There are controversies concerning the sexual predilection of pellucid marginal degeneration. Some studies have reported no difference,[1, 2] while others have reported a male predilection.[3, 5, 6] In a 2016 Japanese study of 162 eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration, 75% of the patients were men.[7]

Age

Patients are usually aged 20-40 years at the time of clinical presentation.

Prognosis

The affected cornea maintains its clarity. However, patients experience progressive deterioration of vision due to irregular astigmatism.[7] The prognosis of pellucid marginal degeneration is clinical.

History

Pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) usually is asymptomatic, except for the progressive deterioration in uncorrected and spectacle corrected visual acuity caused by the irregular astigmatism induced by the corneal ectasia.

The increased corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), especially the trefoil and spherical aberrations, are the leading causes of optical errors, along with the induced against-the-rule astigmatism and visual acuity decline.[8]

Episodes of corneal hydrops with resultant pain, as seen in keratoconus, have been reported, but they occur only rarely.[9]

Physical

Uncorrected visual acuity often is severely reduced. Visual acuity, as measured by using a pinhole, is close to normal. Refraction and keratometry show against-the-rule astigmatism. Visual acuity typically cannot be restored by using a spherocylindrical combination of lenses. Rigid gas permeable contact lenses are often required to treat pellucid marginal degeneration, but patients often experience glare and decreased contrast sensitivity despite achieving good Snellen acuity. It is unclear if this condition is due to the corneal disease or the contact lens wear.

Results of slit lamp examination are characterized by a peripheral band of thinning of the inferior cornea from the 4-o'clock position to the 8-o'clock position; this is shown in the image below.



View Image

Slit lamp image of the inferior cornea in a patient with advanced pellucid marginal degeneration. Image illustrates inferior corneal thinning, a hallm....

This thinning is accompanied by 1-2 mm of normal cornea between the limbus and the area of thinning. Corneal ectasia is most marked just central to the band of thinning. The central cornea usually is of normal thickness, and the epithelium overlying the area of thinning is intact.

Both eyes usually are affected, but the degree of involvement may be asymmetric. The area of thinning typically is epithelialized, clear, avascular, and without lipid deposits. Sporadic reports have described unilateral pellucid marginal degeneration,[10, 11] but a 2016 study suggested that this rate might be higher than previously recognized, precisely 25% in a cohort of 162 eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration.[7]

On careful slit lamp evaluation, prominent lymphatics often are detected at the inferior limbus parallel to the area of thinning. Vertical striations at the level of the Descemet membrane (similar to the Vogt striae) may be seen in rare instances.

Causes

The cause of pellucid marginal degeneration is unknown.

A study of 162 eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration suggested that patients with unilateral involvement might have a different disease background than those with bilateral disease. One fifth of the patients with unilateral involvement had allergic disorders, such as atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and conjunctivitis.[3]

Relationship between pellucid marginal degeneration and keratoconus

Some cases of  PMD may overlap with keratoconus. In a 2016 study, 40% (7 of 17) of patients with unilateral PMD had either keratoconus or were suspected of having keratoconus in the contralateral eye.[7]

Imaging Studies

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Scheimpflug-based corneal imaging systems can illustrate inferior corneal thinning.



View Image

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of cornea with moderate pellucid marginal degeneration.

Other Tests

Computerized videokeratography is extremely useful in detecting and diagnosing early disease, which may not be readily detectable on slit lamp evaluation. Videokeratography shows low corneal power along the central vertical axis, increased power as the inferior cornea is approached, and high corneal power along the inferior oblique meridians. The videokeratographic pattern has a classic butterfly (or crab-claw) appearance, as shown in the image below.



View Image

Corneal topography of early (right eye) and moderate (left eye) pellucid marginal degeneration.

The most common topographic patterns are the "crab-claw" pattern, present in 61.7-75% of patients, followed by inferior steepening, seen in 18-22.2% of patients.[7, 12]



View Image

Representative photographs of corneal topography. Courtesy of the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, published by the Japanese Ophthalmological Societ....

Pachymetry may reveal a thinning of the inferior cornea. This is a reversal of the typical pattern in which the cornea thickens from the center to the periphery. If any part of the peripheral cornea is thinner than the center, this is a cause for concern.

Orbscan may reveal a typical "kissing birds" appearance.[13]

Regueiro et al published a study where they found Toll Like Receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 are over-expressed in corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells in patients with PMD and also in patients with keratoconus. Additionally, they found a correlation between disease severity and the expression of TLR 2 and TLR 4. They propose that TLR are key biomarkers as a diagnostic tool for both diseases and should be studied further as a therapeutic target.[14]

Histologic Findings

Histologic examination shows an area of thinning that is epithelialized, clear, and avascular. The stroma is thinned, and the Bowman layer may have breaks or may be completely absent in the affected area. Typically, lipid deposits are absent, and a normal-appearing endothelium and the Descemet membrane are present. In acute hydrops, breaks in the Descemet membrane with swelling of the stroma and inflammatory cell infiltrate may be seen.

Medical Care

Spectacle correction usually fails early in the course of pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), as the degree of irregular astigmatism increases. In early-to-moderate cases, contact lenses are beneficial in providing visual rehabilitation.

Spectacles and toric hydrophilic contact lenses are useful in mild pellucid marginal degeneration.

Spherical hydrophilic contact lenses cannot correct the astigmatism associated with this condition.

Hybrid contact lenses, which are easier than other lenses to fit to the ectatic cornea, may provide good vision for some patients; however, their poor oxygen permeability often leads to corneal neovascularization, which may adversely affect the prognosis for future corneal transplantation.

Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses provide excellent oxygen transmission to the cornea but are harder than the other lenses to fit. Problems in fitting result from the flattening of the superior cornea and the high degree of against-the-rule astigmatism that often causes the lens to dislocate inferiorly. The upper eyelid may support large-diameter rigid lenses with a high edge lift, but they often cause marked irritation and move excessively with movements of the eyelids, causing the patient's vision to periodically blur. Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses may improve the vision of patients with pellucid marginal degeneration, as in those with keratoconus. However, evidence that these lenses have any effect on the progression of the disease is lacking.

Scleral rigid contact lenses or "mini scleral" contact lenses made from gas-permeable materials are an excellent alternative if fitted by a skilled practitioner.[15, 16]

Surgical Care

In patients who cannot tolerate contact lenses or in those who do not achieve adequate visual acuity with rigid contact lenses because of the degree of ectasia, surgery may be considered.

A number of surgical procedures have been performed to provide visual rehabilitation. Standard-sized penetrating keratoplasty may produce poor results because the inferior edge of the transplant has to be sutured to an abnormally thin cornea, causing a high degree of postkeratoplasty astigmatism in the short- and long-term period. Continued thinning of the host cornea in the inferior aspect produces a situation similar to the situation that indicated surgery.

Large-diameter grafts have been tried to remove as much of the affected cornea as possible, with good success. However, because of the proximity to the limbus and its blood vessels, these grafts may be prone to rejection. Regular-sized grafts that are deliberately decentered in the inferior aspect also work poorly. The degree of astigmatism is large because of the decentering, and the incidence of rejection is high because of the proximity to the limbus. Thermokeratoplasty and epikeratophakia are of only historical interest because the results obtained with these techniques are extremely poor.

Excision of a crescentic wedge of corneal tissue from the inferior cornea, followed by tight suturing, has been reported to reduce the corneal ectasia.[8]  The procedure usually is well tolerated; however, the effect typically is short-lived, and thinning and ectasia recur. In addition, this procedure may be hazardous in inexperienced hands. Several instances of wound dehiscence and resultant flat anterior chambers with its attendant problems have been reported with attempts of this procedure. Crescentic lamellar keratoplasty, in which a crescentic transplant is performed to reinforce the area of thinning, has been described, but it may result in a high degree of astigmatism that necessitates subsequent central penetrating keratoplasty.

Modified intrastromal lamellar sclerokeratoplasty incorporating a scleral tunnel and perioperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) mapping is a novel technique developed to correct both corneal thinning and induced corneal astigmatism. Corneal thinning is mapped using OCT. Then, through a scleral tunnel, an intrastromal pocket is created via stromal lamellar dissection under OCT guidance. A 300-μm-thick stromal lamellar graft was inserted in the pocket before closure of the sclera to increase vertical median keratometry.[17]

The combination of peripheral lamellar crescentic keratoplasty, followed by a central penetrating keratoplasty after a few months, is a favored surgical treatment. The lamellar transplant restores normal thickness to the inferior cornea and enables good edge-to-edge apposition at the time of penetrating keratoplasty, reducing the possibility of high postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Furthermore, the central graft that is now sutured to normal-thickness host tissue can be treated with videokeratography-guided selective removal of sutures and astigmatic keratotomy in the usual way to reduce any residual astigmatism.

Ophthalmologists have begun performing the 2 operations in the same sitting, with encouraging results, though this approach is technically difficult. Performing 2 keratoplasty procedures at different times necessitates the use of 2 separate corneas. By performing the 2 procedures in the same sitting, tissue from the same donor may be used, potentially reducing the antigenic load. Because a central graft almost always is needed, performing both procedures at the same time significantly decreases the time needed to attain best-corrected acuity; this is shown in the image below. This consideration is important, as patients often are young and in the active and working phase of their lives.



View Image

Image shows simultaneous central penetrating keratoplasty and inferior peripheral lamellar keratoplasty performed to treat pellucid marginal degenerat....

The femtosecond laser also has been used to make lamellar dissections to place Intacs and Intracorneal ring segments.[18, 19]  In 2022, Javad Hashemian et al published a prospective interventional study in 36 eyes with PMD. With a single intracorneal segment the uncorrected distance and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, cylinder and keratometry readings improved and were stable for 6 months. However, the spheric refraction did not have a change statistically significant if the values where compared with patients with Keratoconus.[20]

Corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) also has been studied as treatment for PMD. In 2022 Van Tigchelt et al published a review of literature about the indications for cross linking; they found only 11 case reports and series with the finding of improvement in visual acuity and most important in the stabilization of the disease, but no significant changes in refraction or pachymetry.[21]

A case of successful sliding keratoplasty combined with I-CXL was reported in 2016 and was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of advanced PMD.[22]

Long-term follow-up is required to assess the efficacy of these newer procedures.

Consultations

Treatment of pellucid marginal degeneration with either contact lenses or surgery requires considerable experience. A cornea specialist should be consulted to ensure the best visual outcome.

Further Outpatient Care

Patients with pellucid marginal degeneration should receive follow-up care as needed.

Complications

Corneal hydrops similar to that seen in keratoconus, with disruption of the endothelial basement membrane and hydration of the adjacent corneal stroma, rarely occurs in pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD).[23]

Spontaneous corneal perforations in cases of pellucid marginal degeneration are rare. A few case reports have been published in the literature.[23, 24, 25]

Prognosis

No large-scale longitudinal studies of pellucid marginal degeneration have been reported. Quantifying the proportion of patients who eventually require surgery is difficult. Contact lens fitting and surgical correction are more difficult with pellucid marginal degeneration than with keratoconus.

In a follow-up of their ongoing longitudinal study of keratoconus, Rabinowitz and Rasheed have observed 31 patients with pellucid marginal degeneration up to 8 years.[26]  Five patients have required corneal transplantation in 1 eye, and 1 patient has required transplantation in both eyes. The data must be interpreted with caution because these observations may have been affected by selection bias.

Author

Jean Deschênes, MD, FRCSC, Professor, Research Associate, Director, Uveitis Program, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine; Senior Ophthalmologist, Clinical Director, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Angela Maria Fajardo Palomino, MD, Fellow in Cornea, External Disease and Uveitis, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Susan Ruyu Qi , University of Montreal Faculty of Medicine, Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Simon K Law, MD, PharmD, Clinical Professor of Health Sciences, Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christopher J Rapuano, MD, Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University; Director of the Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: AAO; OMIC; American Society of Ophthalmic Trauma (ASOT); Avellino, Baxis; Bio-Tissue; Celularity; Dompe; Emmecell; Glaukos; Kala; Oyster Point; Tarsus; TearLab<br/>Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Dompe<br/>Received research grant from: Glaukos<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: AAO; OMIC; Baxis; Bio-Tissue; Cellularity; Dompe; Glaukos; Kala; TearLab<br/>stock options for: RPS, Fount Bio.

Chief Editor

Hampton Roy, Sr, MD, † Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Fernando H Murillo-Lopez, MD, Senior Surgeon, Unidad Privada de Oftalmologia CEMES

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Karim Rasheed, MD, MSc, Medical Director, Sani Eye Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Yaron Rabinowitz, MD, Chairman, Division of Ophthalmology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Clinical Associate Professor, Departments of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Krachmer JH. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Jul. 96(7):1217-21. [View Abstract]
  2. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 Jan-Feb. 28 (4):293-322. [View Abstract]
  3. Sridhar MS, Mahesh S, Bansal AK, Nutheti R, Rao GN. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2004 Jun. 111 (6):1102-7. [View Abstract]
  4. Das AV, Pillutla LN, Chaurasia S. Clinical profile and demographic distribution of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration in India: A study of 559 patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec. 69 (12):3488-3493. [View Abstract]
  5. Kompella VB, Aasuri MK, Rao GN. Management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration with rigid gas permeable contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002 Jul. 28 (3):140-5. [View Abstract]
  6. Tzelikis PF, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR. Management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Cornea. 2005 Jul. 24 (5):555-60. [View Abstract]
  7. Shimazaki J, Maeda N, Hieda O, Ohashi Y, Murakami A, Nishida K, et al. National survey of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep. 60 (5):341-8. [View Abstract]
  8. Genç S, Çakır H, Güler E, Çallı Ü. Refractive and Corneal Aberrometric Changes After Crescentic Lamellar Wedge Resection in Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Jul 21. [View Abstract]
  9. Bhandari V, Ganesh S. Corneal Hydrops in Pellucid Marginal Degeneration: A Case Series. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Aug. 6 (2):191-9. [View Abstract]
  10. Basak SK, Hazra TK, Bhattacharya D, Sinha TK. Unilateral pellucid marginal degeneration. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep. 48 (3):233-4. [View Abstract]
  11. Kaushik S, Jain AK, Saini JS. Unilateral pellucid marginal degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2003 Mar. 17 (2):246-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Fuchihata M, Maeda N, Toda R, Koh S, Fujikado T, Nishida K. Characteristics of corneal topographic and pachymetric patterns in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar. 58 (2):131-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Oie Y, Maeda N, Kosaki R, Suzaki A, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, et al. Characteristics of ocular higher-order aberrations in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov. 34(11):1928-34. [View Abstract]
  14. Regueiro U, Pérez-Mato M, Hervella P, Campos F, Sobrino T, Lema I. Toll-like receptors as diagnostic targets in pellucid marginal degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2020 Nov. 200:108211. [View Abstract]
  15. Asena L, Altınörs DD. Clinical outcomes of scleral Misa lenses for visual rehabilitation in patients with pellucid marginal degeneration. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Dec. 39 (6):420-424. [View Abstract]
  16. Rathi VM, Dumpati S, Mandathara PS, Taneja MM, Sangwan VS. Scleral contact lenses in the management of pellucid marginal degeneration. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Jun. 39 (3):217-20. [View Abstract]
  17. Guindolet D, Petrovic A, Doan S, Cochereau I, Gabison EE. Sclerocorneal Intrastromal Lamellar Keratoplasty for Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. Cornea. 2016 Jun. 35 (6):900-3. [View Abstract]
  18. Ertan A, Bahadir M. J. Intrastromal ring segment insertion using a femtosecondlaser to correct pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Oct. 32(10):1710-6. [View Abstract]
  19. Ghajarnia M, Moshirfar M, Mifflin MD. Descemet detachment after femtosecond-laser-assisted placement of intrastromal ring segments in pellucid marginal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec. 34(12):2174-6. [View Abstract]
  20. Hashemian SJ, Abdolalizadeh P, Ghiasian L, Aghaei H, Hadavandkhani A, Semnani FN, et al. Outcomes of a Single-Segment Intrastromal Corneal Ring in Early Keratoconus and Early Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct. 42 (10):2987-2996. [View Abstract]
  21. Van Tigchelt L, Van Eijgen J, Delbeke H. Alternative indications for corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Oct 1. 47 (10):1360-1366. [View Abstract]
  22. Spadea L, Maraone G, Cagini C. Sliding Keratoplasty Followed by Transepithelial Iontophoresis Collagen Cross-linking for Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. J Refract Surg. 2016 Jan. 32 (1):47-50. [View Abstract]
  23. Jeng BH, Aldave AJ, McLeod SD. Spontaneous corneal hydrops and perforation in both eyes of a patient with pellucid marginal degeneration. Cornea. 2003 Oct. 22 (7):705-6. [View Abstract]
  24. Lee WB, O'Halloran HS, Grossniklaus HE. Pellucid marginal degeneration and bilateral corneal perforation: case report and review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Jul. 34 (4):229-33. [View Abstract]
  25. Symes RJ, Catt CJ, Sa-ngiampornpanit T, Males JJ. Corneal perforation associated with pellucid marginal degeneration and treatment with crescentic lamellar keratoplasty: two case reports. Cornea. 2007 Jun. 26 (5):625-8. [View Abstract]
  26. Rasheed K, Rabinowitz YS. Results of combined lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty for pellucid marginal degeneration [abstr]. Ophthalmol Suppl. 1997. Oct:191.
  27. Javadi MA, Karimian F, Hosseinzadeh A, Noroozizadeh HM, Sa'eedifar MR, Rabie HM, et al. Lamellar crescentic resection for pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Refract Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr. 20(2):162-5. [View Abstract]
  28. Kymionis GD, Aslanides IM, Siganos CS, Pallikaris IG. Intacs for early pellucid marginal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jan. 30(1):230-3. [View Abstract]
  29. Maccheron LJ, Daya SM. Wedge resection and lamellar dissection for pellucid marginal degeneration. Cornea. 2012 Jun. 31(6):708-15. [View Abstract]
  30. Maguire LJ, Klyce SD, McDonald MB, Kaufman HE. Corneal topography of pellucid marginal degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1987 May. 94(5):519-24. [View Abstract]
  31. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan-Feb. 42(4):297-319. [View Abstract]
  32. Schanzlin DJ, Sarno EM, Robin JB. Crescentic lamellar keratoplasty for pellucid marginal degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Aug. 96(2):253-4. [View Abstract]
  33. Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Behunin NL, Christiansen SM. Current options in the management of pellucid marginal degeneration. J Refract Surg. 2014 Jul. 30 (7):474-85. [View Abstract]
  34. Bhandari V, Ganesh S. Corneal Hydrops in Pellucid Marginal Degeneration: A Case Series. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Aug. 6 (2):191-9. [View Abstract]

Slit lamp image of the inferior cornea in a patient with advanced pellucid marginal degeneration. Image illustrates inferior corneal thinning, a hallmark of this disease.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of cornea with moderate pellucid marginal degeneration.

Corneal topography of early (right eye) and moderate (left eye) pellucid marginal degeneration.

Representative photographs of corneal topography. Courtesy of the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, published by the Japanese Ophthalmological Society.

Image shows simultaneous central penetrating keratoplasty and inferior peripheral lamellar keratoplasty performed to treat pellucid marginal degeneration.

Slit lamp image of the inferior cornea in a patient with advanced pellucid marginal degeneration. Image illustrates inferior corneal thinning, a hallmark of this disease.

Corneal topography of early (right eye) and moderate (left eye) pellucid marginal degeneration.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of cornea with moderate pellucid marginal degeneration.

Image shows simultaneous central penetrating keratoplasty and inferior peripheral lamellar keratoplasty performed to treat pellucid marginal degeneration.

Representative photographs of corneal topography. Courtesy of the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, published by the Japanese Ophthalmological Society.