Bacterial Endophthalmitis

Back

Practice Essentials

Bacterial endophthalmitis (see the image below) is an inflammatory reaction of the intraocular fluids or tissues caused by microbial organisms. Bacteria may gain entry into the eye via corneal or scleral trauma (surgical or accidental) or hematogenously. If not properly treated, bacterial endophthalmitis can result in complete vision loss and persistent ocular pain.



View Image

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Hypopyon, 3 days after phacoemulsification.

Signs and symptoms

The clinical presentation depends on the route of entry, the infecting organism, and the duration of the disease. In general, patients complain of the following:

Bacterial endophthalmitis is classified on the basis of routes of entry (ie, exogenous or endogenous).[1] Disease from exogenous sources includes the following:

On physical examination, general findings in bacteria endophthalmitis are as follows:

Specific physical examination findings are as follows:

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Perform culture and sensitivity studies on aqueous and vitreous samples to determine the type of organism and antibiotic sensitivity.[9, 10] If endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is suspected, a systemic workup for the source is required, with cultures of blood, sputum, and urine.[11]

Sampling procedures

For anterior chamber taps, a 30-gauge needle on a tuberculin syringe is used to obtain a 0.1-mL sample under topical anesthesia through the limbus. For vitreous taps, a sub-Tenon or retrobulbar block with lidocaine with epinephrine is given, and a 21-gauge needle on a tuberculin syringe is used to obtain an adequate vitreous sample of 0.1-0.2 mL.

B-scan ultrasound

Other imaging studies

In traumatic cases, a CT scan may show thickening of the sclera and uveal tissues associated with various degree of increased density in the vitreous and periocular soft tissue structures. For possible endogenous cases, imaging modalities to rule out potential sources of infection include 2-dimensional echocardiography and chest x-ray.

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an ocular emergency, and urgent treatment is required to reduce the potential of significant visual loss.[13, 14] All patients should have therapy consisting of the following[15, 16, 17, 18] :

When the inflammation is severe, systemic and periocular therapy may be used in non–cataract-induced, delayed onset, filtering bleb–associated, and posttraumatic endophthalmitis. In endogenous endophthalmitis, systemic, topical, and possibly periocular therapy is usually required.[8]

Antibiotics

Surgical care

Surgical intervention is usually performed urgently; however, elective surgery may suffice in delayed-onset cases. Indications for surgical therapy include the following:

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Background

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an inflammatory reaction of the intraocular fluids or tissues caused by microbial organisms. See the images below.



View Image

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Retinopathy induced by Enterococcus faecalis endotoxin.



View Image

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Hypopyon, 3 days after phacoemulsification.

Pathophysiology

The entry of bacteria into the eye occurs from a breakdown of the ocular barriers. Penetration through the cornea or sclera results in an exogenous insult to the eye. If the entry is through the vascular system, then an endogenous route occurs. After the bacteria gain entry into the eye, rapid proliferation occurs.

The vitreous acts as a superb medium for bacteria growth, and, in the past, animal vitreous was used as a culture medium. Bacteria, as foreign objects, incite an inflammatory response. The cascade of inflammatory products occurs resulting in an increase in the blood-ocular barrier breakdown and an increase in inflammatory cell recruitment. The damage to the eye occurs from the breakdown of the inflammatory cells releasing the digestive enzymes as well as the possible toxins produced by the bacteria. Destruction occurs at all tissue levels that are in contact with the inflammatory cells and toxins.

Frequency

United States

Incidence after intraocular surgery is less than 0.1%. Incidence of culture-proven endophthalmitis is similar to that of extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification.

Europe

Creuzot-Garcher et al report an incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after stand-alone cataract surgery in France of 0.102%, increasing to 0.149% when cataract surgery was combined with corneal, glaucoma, or vitreoretinal procedures.[22]

Mortality/Morbidity

If not properly treated, a risk of complete vision loss and the possibility of persistent ocular pain exist. Infection very rarely spreads beyond the confines of the sclera and tracks into surrounding tissue structures.

Prognosis

The prognosis depends on the following:

From the EVS, the percentage of patients achieving a final visual acuity of 20/100 or better were as follows:

A statistically significant number (P < 0.001) of poorer visual outcomes occurred with a positive Gram stain or when bacteria other than gram-positive, coagulase-negative cocci were found.[13]

Patient Education

Direct patients to maintain hygienic practice after surgery.

History

The clinical presentation is dependent on the route of entry, the infecting organism, and the duration of the disease. In general, patients complain of a decrease in vision, often with a red eye. Most patients also may complain of a deep ocular pain. Classification is based on routes of entry.[1]

Exogenous source

Acute postoperative (< 6 wk postoperative), as follows:[2, 3]

Delayed onset or chronic pseudophakic postoperative (>6 wk postoperative), as follows:[2]

Endogenous source

No recent history of ocular surgery is present.

Confusion with delayed onset or chronic postoperative is possible if suspicion for endogenous route is not ruled out.

The symptoms are rarely bilateral.

Physical

General findings include the following:

Specific findings include the following:

Causes

Causes are related to classification of exogenous and endogenous, as follows:[25]

Bacteria involved include the following[28] :

Complications

See the list below:

Laboratory Studies

Perform culture and sensitivity studies on aqueous and vitreous samples to determine the type of organism and antibiotic sensitivity.[9, 10]

Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano et al found that anterior chamber tap has too low a sensitivity and specificity to rely on alone, but could be helpful for therapeutic guidance if better methods of diagnosis are not available.[36]

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been shown to be sensitive and specific in detecting and identifying 12 major microbial species in postoperative endophthalmitis.[37]

If endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is suspected, a systemic workup for the source is required. This workup includes the following[11] :

Imaging Studies

B-scan ultrasonography

Perform B-scan ultrasound of the posterior pole if view of fundus is poor.

Typically, choroidal thickening and ultrasound echoes in the anterior and posterior vitreous support the diagnosis.

Occasionally, another source of inflammation other than or in addition to bacteria, such as retained lens material, may be seen.

The ultrasound is also important to provide a baseline prior to intraocular intervention and to assess the posterior vitreous face and areas of possible traction.[12]

Rarely, a retinal detachment is seen concurrently with endophthalmitis.

CT scanning

A CT scan rarely is performed unless trauma is involved. Thickening of the sclera and uveal tissues associated with various degree of increased density in the vitreous and periocular soft tissue structures may be seen.

Endogenous

If an endogenous route is considered, perform other imaging modalities to rule out potential sources, as follows:

Procedures

Anterior chamber tap

A 30-gauge needle on a tuberculin syringe is used to obtain a 0.1 cc sample under topical anesthesia through the limbus.

Vitreous tap

A retrobulbar block or a sub-Tenon block with lidocaine with epinephrine is given.

A sub-Tenon block has the advantage over a retrobulbar block because it does not create increased intraocular pressure that may cause recent surgical wounds to open.

A 21-gauge needle on a tuberculin syringe is used to obtain an adequate vitreous sample of 0.1-0.2 cc. Smaller gauge needles may be used but with increasing difficulty to create the aspiration vacuum necessary to obtain a sample.

Vitreous biopsy

A 23-gauge vitrectomy cutter may be used if available.

Medical Care

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an ocular emergency, and urgent treatment is required to reduce the potential of significant visual loss.[13, 14]

All patients should have therapy consisting of intravitreal and topical antibiotics, topical steroids, and cycloplegics.[15, 16, 17, 18]

The Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) identified that the use of periocular and intravenous antibiotics are not required in endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. Medical therapy was found to be statistically as effective as surgical intervention when the presenting vision was hand motion or better. Use caution in interpreting the data from the EVS; apply it cautiously to non–cataract-related endophthalmitis.[38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]

When the inflammation is severe, systemic and periocular therapy may be used in non–cataract-induced, delayed onset, filtering bleb–associated, and posttraumatic endophthalmitis.

In endogenous endophthalmitis, systemic, topical, and possibly periocular therapy is usually required.[8]

Storey et al reported that increased rates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in culture-positive endophthalmitis cases may result from the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics following intravitreal injections,[44] although, from 1999-2012, Gupta et al was unable to document emerging resistance to empirical antibiotics commonly used to treat bacterial endophthalmitis.[45] Kodati et al performed a 23-year review that found vancomycin was still the optimal antibiotic for gram-positive endophthalmitis, and amikacin and ceftazidime offered equal protection for gram-negative endophthalmitis.[46]

Surgical Care

Surgical intervention is usually performed urgently except in the delayed onset category where elective surgery may suffice.

Indications for surgical therapy

Acute pseudophakic postoperative - When the presenting vision is light perception or worse[21]

Delayed onset or chronic postoperative - If marked inflammation or a subcapsular plaque is identified, surgical removal is required.

Filtering bleb associated - If marked inflammation is present. Take care not to disturb the bleb if some function still exists. To allow the possibility of a shunt valve to be placed at a later time, make an attempt to minimize the disturbance to the superior conjunctiva. If the patient is aphakic, performing the pars plana vitrectomy from the temporal side using a limbal approach may be required.

Posttraumatic - If marked inflammation or rapid onset occurs

Technique

A 3-port core pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotic injections is performed.[47] If visualization is poor from anterior segment pathology, then a 2-port limited pars plana vitrectomy or endoscopic guided 3-port pars plana vitrectomy may be performed.[48]

An increased risk for retinal tears and detachments occur when the vitreous close to the retina is removed aggressively due to the higher probability of retinal necrosis.

Intravitreal antibiotics usually are given after the completion of the vitrectomy; however, if an air-fluid exchange is to be performed, the antibiotics may be mixed into the vitrectomy solution. Dilute the antibiotics in the vitrectomy solution carefully to prevent possible toxic retinopathy from incorrect dosages.

Consultations

In most exogenous cases of endophthalmitis, the ophthalmologist may manage the case sufficiently; however, in cases of less common or extremely virulent bacteria, consulting an infectious disease specialist may aid in the selection of antibiotics.

When endogenous cases of endophthalmitis are suspected, an internist should be consulted to look for a source.

Prevention

See the list below:

Further Outpatient Care

Patients should receive follow-up care on a daily basis. Clinical features indicating improvement include the following:

If no improvement occurs in 48-72 hours, consider the following:

If view is poor, B-scan ultrasound is useful to rule out retinal detachment.

Further Inpatient Care

Patients may be admitted or may be treated as outpatients depending on the following:

Inpatient & Outpatient Medications

Topical antibiotic coverage with dosage dependent on severity, as follows:

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to eradicate the infection, to reduce morbidity, and to prevent complications. Various routes for drug administration are available. Intravitreous is the most effective.

Vancomycin

Clinical Context:  Potent antibiotic directed against gram-positive organisms and active against Enterococcus species. Indicated for patients who cannot receive or have failed to respond to penicillins and cephalosporins or have infections with resistant staphylococci.

Ahmed et al reported that intravitreal, rather than intravenous, vancomycin is necessary for the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis. It is not necessary to monitor vancomycin levels when administered via intravitreal injection.

Ceftazidime (Fortaz, Tazicef)

Clinical Context:  First-line choice for intravitreal gram-negative coverage. Third-generation cephalosporin with broad-spectrum, gram-negative activity; lower efficacy against gram-positive organisms; higher efficacy against resistant organisms. Arrests bacterial growth by binding to one or more penicillin-binding proteins.

Amikacin

Clinical Context:  Second-line choice for intravitreal injection for gram-negative coverage. For gram-negative bacterial coverage of infections resistant to gentamicin and tobramycin. Effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Irreversibly binds to 30S subunit of bacterial ribosomes; blocks recognition step in protein synthesis; causes growth inhibition. Use the patient's IBW for dosage calculation.

Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic (Ciloxan)

Clinical Context:  Fluoroquinolone with activity against pseudomonas, streptococci, MRSA, S epidermidis, and most gram-negative organisms, but may have limited activity against anaerobes. Inhibits bacterial DNA synthesis, and consequently growth. Provides gram-positive coverage. Uncertain benefit in noncataract causes.

Ofloxacin ophthalmic (Ocuflox)

Clinical Context:  A pyridine carboxylic acid derivative with broad-spectrum bactericidal effect, ofloxacin inhibits bacterial growth by inhibiting DNA gyrase. It is indicated for superficial ocular infections of the conjunctiva or cornea caused by susceptible strains of microorganisms.

Levofloxacin ophthalmic (Iquix, Quixin)

Clinical Context:  Levofloxacin is an S (-) enantiomer of ofloxacin. It inhibits DNA gyrase in susceptible organisms, thereby inhibiting relaxation of supercoiled DNA and promoting breakage of DNA strands.

Gatifloxacin ophthalmic (Zymaxid)

Clinical Context:  A fourth-generation fluoroquinolone ophthalmic indicated for bacterial conjunctivitis, gatifloxacin elicits a dual mechanism of action by possessing an 8-methoxy group, thereby inhibiting the enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. DNA gyrase is involved in bacterial DNA replication, transcription, and repair. Topoisomerase IV is essential in chromosomal DNA partitioning during bacterial cell division. Gatifloxacin is indicated for bacterial conjunctivitis.

Moxifloxacin ophthalmic (Moxeza, Vigamox)

Clinical Context:  Indicated to treat bacterial conjunctivitis. Elicits antimicrobial effects. Inhibits topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and IV enzymes. DNA gyrase is essential in bacterial DNA replication, transcription, and repair. Topoisomerase IV plays a key role in chromosomal DNA portioning during bacterial cell division.

Class Summary

Therapy must be comprehensive and cover all likely pathogens in the context of this clinical setting.

Prednisolone acetate (Pred Forte, Omnipred, Pred Mild)

Clinical Context:  Treats acute inflammations following eye surgery or other types of insults to eye.

Decreases inflammation and corneal neovascularization. Suppresses migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reverses increased capillary permeability.

In cases of bacterial infections, concomitant use of anti-infective agents is mandatory; if signs and symptoms do not improve after 2 days, reevaluate patient. Dosing may be reduced, but advise patients not to discontinue therapy prematurely. Dosage dependent on severity of inflammation.

Dexamethasone (Ozurdex, Maxidex)

Clinical Context:  For various allergic and inflammatory diseases. Decreases inflammation by suppressing migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reducing capillary permeability.

Triamcinolone (Triesence)

Clinical Context:  Treats inflammatory dermatosis responsive to steroids. Decreases inflammation by suppressing migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and reversing capillary permeability.

Class Summary

Have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. Corticosteroids modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.

Atropine ophthalmic

Clinical Context:  DOC; acts at parasympathetic sites in smooth muscle to block response of sphincter muscle of iris and muscle of ciliary body to acetylcholine, causing mydriasis and cycloplegia.

Class Summary

Reduces ciliary spasm that may cause pain. Anticholinergic agents are also mydriatics, and the practitioner should make sure that the patient does not have glaucoma. This medication could provoke an acute angle-closure attack.

Author

Robert H Graham, MD, Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona

Disclosure: Partner received salary from Medscape/WebMD for employment.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

R Christopher Walton, MD, Adjunct Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Hampton Roy, Sr, MD, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Andrew W Lawton, MD, Neuro-Ophthalmology, Ochsner Health Services

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous coauthors, David T Wong, MD, FRCS(C), and Hesham Lakosha, MBChB, MS, FRCS, to the development and writing of this article.

References

  1. Davis JL. Diagnostic dilemmas in retinitis and endophthalmitis. Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb. 26(2):194-201. [View Abstract]
  2. Forster RK. Etiology and diagnosis of bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1978 Apr. 85(4):320-6. [View Abstract]
  3. Arshinoff SA, Bastianelli PA. Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Dec. 37(12):2105-14. [View Abstract]
  4. Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, Mieler WF, Liggett PE. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. National Eye Trauma System. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct. 100(10):1468-74. [View Abstract]
  5. Irvine WD, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG, Rubsamen PE. Retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification manifesting as marked intraocular inflammation with hypopyon. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Nov 15. 114(5):610-4. [View Abstract]
  6. Packer AJ, Weingeist TA, Abrams GW. Retinal periphlebitis as an early sign of bacterial endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jul. 96(1):66-71. [View Abstract]
  7. Mieler WF, Ellis MK, Williams DF, Han DP. Retained intraocular foreign bodies and endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1990 Nov. 97(11):1532-8. [View Abstract]
  8. Okada AA, Johnson RP, Liles WC, D'Amico DJ, Baker AS. Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis. Report of a ten-year retrospective study. Ophthalmology. 1994 May. 101(5):832-8. [View Abstract]
  9. Donahue SP, Kowalski RP, Jewart BH, Friberg TR. Vitreous cultures in suspected endophthalmitis. Biopsy or vitrectomy?. Ophthalmology. 1993 Apr. 100(4):452-5. [View Abstract]
  10. Hariprasad SM, Shah GK, Chi J, Prince RA. Determination of aqueous and vitreous concentration of moxifloxacin 0.5% after delivery via a dissolvable corneal collagen shield device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Nov. 31(11):2142-6. [View Abstract]
  11. Chiquet C, Cornut PL, Benito Y, et al. Eubacterial PCR for bacterial detection and identification in 100 acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 May. 49(5):1971-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Chan IM, Jalkh AE, Trempe CL, Tolentino FI. Ultrasonographic findings in endophthalmitis. Ann Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug. 16(8):778-84. [View Abstract]
  13. Callegan MC, Gilmore MS, Gregory M, et al. Bacterial endophthalmitis: therapeutic challenges and host-pathogen interactions. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Mar. 26(2):189-203. [View Abstract]
  14. Garat M, Moser CL, Alonso-Tarres C, Martin-Baranera M, Alberdi A. Intracameral cefazolin to prevent endophthalmitis in cataract surgery: 3-year retrospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Nov. 31(11):2230-4. [View Abstract]
  15. Flynn HW Jr, Pulido JS, Pflugfelder SC, et al. Endophthalmitis therapy: changing antibiotic sensitivity patterns and current therapeutic recommendations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb. 109(2):175-6. [View Abstract]
  16. Costello P, Bakri SJ, Beer PM, et al. Vitreous penetration of topical moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in humans. Retina. 2006 Feb. 26(2):191-5. [View Abstract]
  17. Gan IM, Ugahary LC, van Dissel JT, et al. Intravitreal dexamethasone as adjuvant in the treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis: a prospective randomized trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec. 243(12):1200-5. [View Abstract]
  18. Smiddy WE, Smiddy RJ, Ba'Arath B, et al. Subconjunctival antibiotics in the treatment of endophthalmitis managed without vitrectomy. Retina. 2005 Sep. 25(6):751-8. [View Abstract]
  19. Assaad D, Wong D, Mikhail M, Tawfik S, Altomare F, Berger A, et al. Bacterial endophthalmitis: 10-year review of the culture and sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec. 50 (6):433-7. [View Abstract]
  20. Ahmed S, Kuruvilla O, Yee DC, Aggarwal H, Li Y, Edwards P, et al. Intraocular penetration of systemic antibiotics in eyes with penetrating ocular injury. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Dec. 30 (10):823-30. [View Abstract]
  21. Miller JJ, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE, Newton J, Miller D. Acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2000-2004): incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun. 139(6):983-7. [View Abstract]
  22. Creuzot-Garcher CP, Mariet AS, Benzenine E, Daien V, Korobelnik JF, Bron AM, et al. Is combined cataract surgery associated with acute postoperative endophthalmitis? A nationwide study from 2005 to 2014. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 20. [View Abstract]
  23. Deramo VA, Lai JC, Winokur J, Luchs J, Udell IJ. Visual outcome and bacterial sensitivity after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-associated acute endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar. 145(3):413-417. [View Abstract]
  24. Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, Gelender H, Culbertson W. Late onset endophthalmitis associated with filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1985 Jul. 92(7):964-72. [View Abstract]
  25. Hariprasad SM, Shah GK, Mieler WF, et al. Vitreous and aqueous penetration of orally administered moxifloxacin in humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb. 124(2):178-82. [View Abstract]
  26. Zapp D, Loos D, Feucht N, Khoramnia R, Tandogan T, Reznicek L, et al. Microbial keratitis-induced endophthalmitis: incidence, symptoms, therapy, visual prognosis and outcomes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 May 3. 18 (1):112. [View Abstract]
  27. Lau PE, Jenkins KS, Layton CJ. Current Evidence for the Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injections. J Ophthalmol. 2018. 2018:8567912. [View Abstract]
  28. Gregory M, Callegan MC, Gilmore MS. Role of bacterial and host factors in infectious endophthalmitis. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2007. 92:266-75. [View Abstract]
  29. Kunimoto DY, Das T, Sharma S, et al. Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates: part I. Postoperative endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Research Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Aug. 128(2):240-2. [View Abstract]
  30. Rathinam SR, Rao NA. Sympathetic ophthalmia following postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar. 141(3):498-507. [View Abstract]
  31. Somani S, Grinbaum A, Slomovic AR. Postoperative endophthalmitis: incidence, predisposing surgery, clinical course and outcome. Can J Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug. 32(5):303-10. [View Abstract]
  32. Winward KE, Pflugfelder SC, Flynn HW Jr, Roussel TJ, Davis JL. Postoperative Propionibacterium endophthalmitis. Treatment strategies and long-term results. Ophthalmology. 1993 Apr. 100(4):447-51. [View Abstract]
  33. Greenfield DS, Suner IJ, Miller MP, Kangas TA, Palmberg PF, Flynn HW Jr. Endophthalmitis after filtering surgery with mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Aug. 114(8):943-9. [View Abstract]
  34. Bouza E, Grant S, Jordan C, Yook RH, Sulit HL. Bacillus cereus endogenous panophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Mar. 97(3):498-9. [View Abstract]
  35. Soheilian M, Rafati N, Mohebbi MR, et al. Prophylaxis of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of intraocular antibiotic injection, report 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr. 125(4):460-5. [View Abstract]
  36. Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano C, Soberon-Ventura VF, Salcedo-Villanueva G, Santos-Palacios A, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, Fromow-Guerra J, et al. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017. 4:18. [View Abstract]
  37. Abrishami M, Hashemi B, Abrishami M, Abnous K, Razavi-Azarkhiavi K, Behravan J. PCR detection and identification of bacterial contaminants in ocular samples from post-operative endophthalmitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr. 9 (4):NC01-3. [View Abstract]
  38. Aaberg TM Jr, Flynn HW Jr, Schiffman J, Newton J. Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis survey. A 10-year review of incidence and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun. 105(6):1004-10. [View Abstract]
  39. Barza M, Pavan PR, Doft BH, et al. Evaluation of microbiological diagnostic techniques in postoperative endophthalmitis in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep. 115(9):1142-50. [View Abstract]
  40. Cohen SM, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG, Smiddy WE. Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy. The Postvitrectomy Endophthalmitis Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1995 May. 102(5):705-12. [View Abstract]
  41. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec. 113(12):1479-96. [View Abstract]
  42. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul. 122(1):1-17. [View Abstract]
  43. Ng JQ, Morlet N, Pearman JW, et al. Management and outcomes of postoperative endophthalmitis since the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: the Endophthalmitis Population Study of Western Australia (EPSWA)'s fifth report. Ophthalmology. 2005 Jul. 112(7):1199-206. [View Abstract]
  44. Storey P, Dollin M, Rayess N, Pitcher J, Reddy S, Vander J, et al. The effect of prophylactic topical antibiotics on bacterial resistance patterns in endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb. 254 (2):235-42. [View Abstract]
  45. Gupta A, Orlans HO, Hornby SJ, Bowler IC. Microbiology and visual outcomes of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis in Oxford, UK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov. 252 (11):1825-30. [View Abstract]
  46. Kodati S, Eller AW, Kowalski RP. The Susceptibility of Bacterial Endophthalmitis Isolates to Vancomycin, Ceftazidime, and Amikacin: a 23 Year-Review. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 May-Jun. 1 (3):206-209. [View Abstract]
  47. Zhang YQ, Wang WJ. Treatment outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy for endogenous endophthalmitis. Retina. 2005 Sep. 25(6):746-50. [View Abstract]
  48. van Kooij B, Rothova A, de Vries P. The pros and cons of intravitreal triamcinolone injections for uveitis and inflammatory cystoid macular edema. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006 Apr. 14(2):73-85. [View Abstract]
  49. Kowalski RP, Romanowski EG, Mah FS, Yates KA, Gordon YJ. Intracameral Vigamox (moxifloxacin 0.5%) is non-toxic and effective in preventing endophthalmitis in a rabbit model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep. 140(3):497-504. [View Abstract]
  50. Alfonso E, Crider J. Ophthalmic infections and their anti-infective challenges. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov. 50 Suppl 1:S1-6. [View Abstract]
  51. Ayata A, Uzun G, Unal M, Yildiz S, Bilge AH. Does hyperbaric oxygen therapy improve outcome in bacterial endophthalmitis?. Med Hypotheses. 2008 Sep. 71(3):470-1. [View Abstract]
  52. Boggs W. Bacterial Virulence Predicts Visual Prognosis in Post-Op Bacterial Endophthalmitis. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/808786. Accessed: August 15, 2013.
  53. Combey de Lambert A, Campolmi N, Cornut PL, Aptel F, Creuzot-Garcher C, Chiquet C. Baseline Factors Predictive of Visual Prognosis in Acute Postoperative Bacterial Endophthalmitis in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul 25. [View Abstract]
  54. Iyer MN, He F, Wensel TG, Mieler WF, Benz MS, Holz ER. Clearance of intravitreal moxifloxacin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jan. 47(1):317-9. [View Abstract]
  55. Katz HR, Masket S, Lane SS, et al. Absorption of topical moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution into human aqueous humor. Cornea. 2005 Nov. 24(8):955-8. [View Abstract]
  56. Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, Chew J, LeBoyer RM, Werner L. Toxic anterior segment syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Feb. 32(2):324-33. [View Abstract]
  57. Prydal JI, Jenkins DR, Lovering A, Watts A. The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in the non-inflamed human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov. 89(11):1418-9. [View Abstract]
  58. Suzuki T, Uno T, Kawamura Y, Joko T, Ohashi Y. Postoperative low-grade endophthalmitis caused by biofilm-producing coccus bacteria attached to posterior surface of intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Oct. 31(10):2019-20. [View Abstract]
  59. Wolner B, Liebmann JM, Sassani JW, Ritch R, Speaker M, Marmor M. Late bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with adjunctive 5-fluorouracil. Ophthalmology. 1991 Jul. 98(7):1053-60. [View Abstract]

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Hypopyon, 3 days after phacoemulsification.

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Retinopathy induced by Enterococcus faecalis endotoxin.

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Hypopyon, 3 days after phacoemulsification.

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Hypopyon, 3 days after phacoemulsification.

Bacterial endophthalmitis. Retinopathy induced by Enterococcus faecalis endotoxin.