Injecting Drug Use

Back

Background

The hypodermic syringe was invented in the mid-1800s. By the late 1800s and early 1900s in the United States, the public could purchase hypodermic needles and syringes legally, and opiates and cocaine were widely available. The Harrison Act in 1914 allowed narcotics to be dispensed only by a prescription from physicians or dentists. Several states also developed legislation preventing the sale of hypodermic syringes and needles without a prescription.

Most individuals who use injection drugs inject their drugs intravenously, but subcutaneous injection (ie, "skin-popping") is also common, and intramuscular injection may occur intentionally or when the individual misses the vein or the subcutaneous space. Injecting drug use is associated with many local and systemic complications for the individual and is also associated with the transmission of infectious diseases via needle sharing and sexual activity. The most commonly injected drug is heroin, but amphetamines, buprenorphine, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, cocaine, and methamphetamine also are injected. Any water-soluble drug may be injected. Treatment of individuals who use injection drugs may be complicated by social and political barriers to treatment and by a lack of resources for public health approaches to treatment.

Both illegal drug production and injecting drug use have been globalized in recent years. Injecting drug use has diffused to countries that formerly had little problem with it. Both injecting drug use and HIV infection can spread rapidly within a community. Introduction of and rapid increase in injecting drug use is believed to be responsible for dramatic increases in HIV infection in some areas. In China, in Central Asia, and in several countries of Eastern Europe, injecting drug use is the primary risk factor for HIV infection.

See related Medscape CME activity, The Dark Side of Drug Addicition.

Pathophysiology

When injecting a drug intravenously, the individual introduces a bolus of the drug into the vein, producing a rapid and powerful drug high. The onset of drug effects is about 15-30 seconds for the intravenous route and 3-5 minutes for the intramuscular or subcutaneous route. Drug effects from inhaling (ie, smoking) a drug begin in 7-10 seconds, and drug effects from intranasal use (ie, transmucosal absorption) begin in 3-5 minutes.

Injecting drug use causes medical problems by introducing pathogens and other contaminants into the body via shared needles and a lack of sterile preparation and injection techniques. Medical problems also arise from damage caused by the drugs themselves (eg, morbidity and mortality associated with drug overdose). The injected drugs also may not be pure; they may be cut with irritants, such as talc, lactate, or quinine.

Death from the direct toxic effects of a heroin overdose itself is usually associated with respiratory depression, coma, and pulmonary edema. Death from the direct effects of cocaine is often associated with cardiac dysrhythmias and conduction disturbances, leading to myocardial infarction and stroke.

Epidemiology

Frequency

According to the 2015 World Drug Report of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), a total of 246 million people used an illicit drug in 2013.[1]

The joint UNODC/WHO/UNAIDS/World Bank estimate for the number of people who inject drugs (PWID) worldwide for 2013 is 12.19 million (range: 8.48-21.46 million). This corresponds to 0.26% (range: 0.18-0.46 per cent) of the adult population aged 15-64 years. This estimate is based on reporting of information on current injecting drug use from 93 countries covering 84% of the global population aged 15-64.[1]

By far the highest prevalence of PWID continues to be found in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, where 1.27% of the general population aged 15-64 is estimated to be injecting drugs, a rate nearly five times the global average.[1]

Mortality/Morbidity

Morbidity and mortality may result from infection secondary to injecting drug use, sequelae of injection with adulterants added to the drug mixture, sequelae of the drug use itself, drug overdose, or violence associated with drug use.

Race

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) found no differences in injection drug use reports by race or ethnicity in the United States in 2002 and 2003.

Sex

Combined 2002-2005 data from NSDUH indicate that US males were twice as likely as females to report injection drug use in the past year.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States reports that 24% of males and 25% of females living with HIV/AIDS in 2003 used injection drugs.[6] Another significant source of HIV infection for women is sex with partners who use injection drugs. An estimated 61% of AIDS cases in women can be attributed to injecting drug use or to sex with partners who use injection drugs. Females may use more shared injecting drug use equipment than males.[7]

Worldwide, 70-90% of those who use injection drugs are believed to be male.

Age

The purity of heroin has been increasing, and its cost has been decreasing. Because of these factors and because of their initial desire to avoid injecting drug use, many adolescents and young adults in the United States and Europe using heroin for the first time try snorting, sniffing, or smoking heroin. New noninjecting heroin users risk making a transition to injecting drug use when their need for heroin use intensifies.

Among adolescents who inject drugs, early school truancy and expulsion may be a predictor of injecting drug use. A younger age of initiation into injecting drug use is associated with more frequent reports of risky drug use and sexual practices, as well as higher rates of HIV infection.[8]

History

Obtain a complete history of the individual's past alcohol and drug use, including the following:

Ask those who report injecting drug use which injecting sites they use, whether they use new or used needles, and whether they share other items used in the preparation of drugs for injection (eg, cookers, cotton). Ask those who share needles and syringes whether they attempt to clean the needles (eg, by using a bleach kit distributed by outreach workers).

Other risks associated with injecting drug use include contaminated drug solutions, buying ready-filled syringes, and sharing rinse water. "Backloading" is a practice in which a dealer transfers the drug solution from a larger syringe to a syringe provided by the user. "Flashblood" is a practice initially reported among sex workers in Dar es Salaam, in which an individual draws blood back into the syringe after having injected heroin, and then passes the syringe to another individual to inject the blood in the belief that this will prevent withdrawal symptoms.

Individuals may inject substances that are not supposed to be injected, such as pulverized (and unsterile) pills mixed with liquid. The liquid used to prepare drugs for injection is usually water, although use of lemonade and vinegar for this purpose has also been reported.

Ask about a history of prior systemic or local infections secondary to injecting drug use.

Physical

Begin with a standard physical assessment, paying special attention to signs of current injecting drug use, such as needle tracks. Other physical signs related to alcohol and drug use may also be present.

Common injection sites, such as the antecubital areas, should be inspected for evidence of recent injection. Some individuals may also use more unusual sites for injection, such as veins in the feet, hands, groin, and even the neck. As individuals who use injection drugs age and commonly used veins sclerose, these individuals may select progressively more dangerous sites. Hospitalized patients and patients who receive intravenous medication may inject drugs into their indwelling intravenous lines.

Check vital signs because changes are commonly associated with alcohol and drug intoxication and withdrawal, as well as with systemic infections secondary to injecting drug use. Stimulants, such as cocaine, may cause hyperthermia, an easily treatable yet easily overlooked condition. Persons who are intoxicated may also present with hypothermia, especially if they have been confused and wandering outside in cold weather.

Perform a mental status examination. Pay special attention to level of alertness because many drug and alcohol intoxication and withdrawal states can produce changes in alertness and orientation. Assess affect and mood and note whether suicidal ideation or intent is present. Drugs of abuse may cause or exacerbate depression and suicidal ideation. Determine the presence or absence of homicidal or violent intent and ask whether the patient has guns at home. Assess thought content and the presence or absence of hallucinations, delusions, or paranoid ideation and ask the patient whether these phenomena seem to be exacerbated or caused by drug use. Many patients with drug-induced delusions or hallucinations are in fact aware of the relationship between their drug use and the delusions or hallucinations.

Causes

Individuals begin using addictive drugs for various reasons; some are seeking a high, some wish to relieve dysphoria, and some seek escape from intolerable feelings or thoughts.

Craving for addictive drugs is associated with increased activation of brain reward areas, including the nucleus accumbens and other brain areas. Drug use directly or indirectly elevates dopamine levels in the mesolimbic pathway of the brain, producing a pleasurable and positively reinforcing high.

Those who are at risk for developing dependence on addictive drugs may have a genetic predilection for this problem.

Neuronal changes in specific brain regions (ie, neuroadaptation) occur in response to repeated drug use. Thus differences exist in the brains of addicted and nonaddicted individuals, and these differences can be demonstrated by brain imaging techniques.

Those who use drugs experience a compulsion to use the addictive drug regardless of negative consequences.

Those who use drugs may make the transition from noninjecting drug use to injecting drug use as their dependence on the drug becomes more severe. Injecting drug use is a popular route of drug administration because the injected substance has almost 100% bioavailability, and the onset of the drug high is fairly rapid, generally 15-30 seconds.

Those who use drugs use nonsterile injecting equipment largely because of the scarcity of sterile needles and syringes. Many people will use sterile needles and syringes if provided access to them. Making sterile injecting equipment available, either for purchase or via a needle exchange program, decreases rates of HIV and hepatitis B infections.

Laboratory Studies

See the list below:

Other Tests

See the list below:

Medical Care

Medical care of individuals who use injection drugs should focus on initial management of local or systemic complications of injecting drug use and then on referral to appropriate chemical dependency treatment programs.[9, 10]

Individuals treated in hospital emergency departments for acute illness may be difficult to evaluate because of medical problems, poor nutrition, debilitation, and drug and alcohol intoxication or withdrawal. Also, at times, they may be unwilling to accept further treatment. Many localities have legal provisions for holding such individuals in the emergency department while they are intoxicated, until they can be stabilized enough for a safe discharge. Once the withdrawal symptoms and other medical symptoms are under control, referrals for chemical dependency treatment may be made.

Treatment of alcohol and drug dependence is generally voluntary, unless psychiatric reasons are present that justify involuntary admission to psychiatric or mentally ill, chemically addicted (MICA) units. Some countries mandate forms of inpatient and outpatient chemical dependency treatment, such as the drug court system in many parts of the United States. Such involuntary treatment can be effective.

Using the strengths of families and natural support systems can help engage individuals in treatment.[11] Employee assistance programs may also be helpful in treatment engagement.

In April 2014, the FDA approved naloxone (Evzio) as an autoinjector dosage form for home use by family members or caregivers. The product delivers 0.4 mg that may be administered either IM or SC in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. The device includes visual and voice instruction, including directions to seek emergency medical care immediately after use.[12]

Because addiction is a complex biopsychosocial problem, effective drug treatment must be comprehensive and must attend to the multiple needs of the individual. Comprehensive treatment might include behavioral therapy; pharmacotherapy; substance use monitoring; self-help groups; family therapy; parenting groups; case management; mental health services; medical services; screening for infectious diseases; and assistance with housing, legal problems, educational needs, and child care. Drug treatment teaches individuals to cope with drug cravings, to avoid relapse to drug use, and to deal with relapse if it occurs.

Addiction is a treatable disease. Treatment for drug addiction reduces the risk of HIV infection. Drug treatment reduces criminal activity and also improves the individual's chances for employment.

In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended use of a 28-day course of antiretroviral therapy to prevent HIV infection in those who have had substantial risk for HIV exposure via injecting drug use. The antiretroviral therapy must be initiated within 72 hours of exposure.[13]

Consultations

Consultation with an expert in chemical dependency, if available, may help with collecting a complete chemical use history, determining the level of chemical dependency treatment needed, and negotiating the logistics of referral to addiction treatment facilities and self-help groups.

Consultation with an infectious disease specialist may be needed to determine the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases associated with injecting drug use.

A consultation with a psychiatrist, if psychiatric symptoms are present, helps determine whether these symptoms are preexisting or whether they are drug induced. A psychiatrist will recommend appropriate treatment for these problems.

Medication Summary

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications.

Methadone (Dolophine)

Clinical Context:  Inhibits ascending pain pathways, diminishing the perception of and response to pain. In most countries, methadone is administered initially in the setting of a drug treatment program, both to prevent diversion (selling) of supply and to assure that counseling and other services also are provided.

Rate of dose increase and maximum dose often depend on program regulations and on federal and state regulations in the United States.

Patients who cannot take anything by mouth may be administered methadone IM, usually in a divided dose.

Buprenorphine (Subutex)

Clinical Context:  Mixed agonist-antagonist narcotic with central analgesic effects for moderate to severe pain. Used sublingually for the initial detoxification treatment of opioid addiction. Produces agonist/antagonist effects at the opioid mu receptor. The agonist effect is limited by a ceiling effect (ie, higher doses [>16 mg] do not produce more analgesia). The sublingual product is called Subutex.

Buprenorphine and naloxone (Suboxone)

Clinical Context:  Used sublingually for the maintenance detoxification treatment (unsupervised phase) of opioid dependence following induction with sublingual buprenorphine (Subutex). Contains both buprenorphine (an opiate agonist/antagonist) and the opiate antagonist naloxone. Naloxone has been added to guard against IV abuse of buprenorphine by individuals physically dependent on opiates.

Levomethadyl (ORLAAM)

Clinical Context:  Indicated for management of opioid dependence. No other recommended uses exist. In most countries, levomethadyl is administered initially in the setting of a drug treatment program, both to prevent diversion (selling) of supply and to assure that counseling and other services also are provided.

Class Summary

Individuals who have injected heroin or other opioids for long periods may need referral for opioid replacement therapy with methadone, buprenorphine, or buprenorphine/naloxone where such programs are available. In the United States, physicians who wish to prescribe buprenorphine must take a certification course. Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) has also been used for opioid replacement therapy, but use of LAAM has been less common because of concerns about severe QT prolongation secondary to LAAM.

Opioid replacement therapy reduces injecting drug use and thus reduces the mortality and morbidity associated with injecting drug use, including the transmission of HIV and HCV.

When individuals who are opioid dependent (including those who are on opioid replacement therapy) need analgesia, the clinician should be aware that these individuals may be tolerant to the analgesic effects of opioids; thus, they may require higher doses for pain control. Individuals taking naltrexone (an opioid antagonist) for opioid or alcohol dependence, also require higher doses of opioid analgesics to overcome the opioid blockade and provide pain relief.

Naltrexone (Revia, Vivitrol)

Clinical Context:  Used in combination with clonidine for rapid (4-5 d) detoxification.

Very effective long-acting opioid antagonist that was thought to be an ideal maintenance agent because it blocks receptor sites and, hence, opioid reinforcing properties. However, clinical results are not very promising when compared with methadone maintenance. Craving may continue during naltrexone maintenance. For groups of patients such as health care professionals or business executives for whom external incentives to stay away from drugs are important, naltrexone therapy has been very effective.

Long-acting parenteral suspension indicated for prevention of relapse to opioid dependence following opioid detoxification. Also indicated for treatment of alcohol dependence in patients who have been able to abstain from alcohol in an outpatient setting prior to treatment initiation.

Naloxone (Evzio, Narcan)

Clinical Context:  Naloxone is a short-acting, pure opioid antagonist that is used to reverse opioid intoxication. If patients do not respond to multiple doses of naloxone, consider alternative causes of unconsciousness. Need of ongoing substance abuse treatment should be established while caring for overdose. The injectable solution is available in vials and syringes (0.4 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL) for IV/IM/SC administration by healthcare providers. It is also available as an autoinjector (delivers 0.4 mg IM/SC) for home use by family or caregivers.

Class Summary

Inhibit opioid effects by inhibiting opioid agonists at receptor sites. FDA approval of extended-release IM naltrexone for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence was based on data from a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study, which met its primary efficacy endpoint and all secondary efficacy endpoints. Once monthly treatment with extended-release IM naltrexone showed statistically significant higher rates of opioid-free urine screens compared with placebo (p< 0.0002).

Complications

Local problems associated with injecting drug use include abscess, cellulitis, septic thrombophlebitis, local induration, necrotizing fascitis, gas gangrene, pyomyositis, mycotic aneurysm, compartmental syndromes, and foreign bodies (eg, broken needle parts) in local areas. The most common causative organisms reported are Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis, streptococci, and gram-negative bacilli.

Systemic problems associated with injecting drug use are HIV infection, hepatitis B or C, pneumonia or lung abscess from septic emboli to the lung, acute and subacute bacterial endocarditis, group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal septicemia, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, candidal and other fungal infections, tetanus, clostridial myonecrosis, malaria, and amyloidosis. The endocarditis that occurs in individuals who inject drugs involves the right-sided heart valves; a recent review found no explanation for this predilection.[14] A rare case of needle embolization to the lung has been reported.

Patient Education

Chemical dependency treatment provides education and skills training regarding abstinence from drug use. For those individuals who are not yet able to abstain from injecting drug use, harm reduction approaches are used to educate about methods of safer injection, including the use of clean needles, sterile injection techniques, and safe disposal of needles.[15] Such outreach approaches are effective in promoting behavior change and slowing the spread of HIV and other infections.[16, 17]

Informal needle exchange programs in the United States began as early as the 1970s. In 1988, the New York City Health Department began the first government-sponsored needle exchange program in the United States. Usually, needle exchange programs operate by exchanging the used needles for an equal number of clean needles and syringes. Needle exchange programs may make referrals for chemical dependency treatment and medical treatment and may participate in other public health initiatives, such as distributing condoms and arranging HIV testing.

In some areas, needles and syringes are available for purchase from a pharmacy without a prescription. Those who purchase needles and syringes from pharmacies are less likely to participate in high-risk activities, such as using the services of crack houses or shooting galleries.

Several countries have developed harm reduction programs with different methods, including the introduction of syringe vending machines[18] and safe injecting areas or rooms.

Programs that distribute injectable naloxone to individuals for use in suspected overdose situations have been implemented in many larger US cities.

To reduce risks associated with injecting drug use, clinicians and public health workers must raise awareness of the health consequences and risks of injection, make contact with the target population by improving access and outreach, provide the means to change risky behavior, and gain political and community support for the measures introduced.

For excellent patient education resources, see eMedicineHealth's patient education articles Drug Dependence and Abuse, Narcotic Abuse, and Substance Abuse.

Author

Gloria J Baciewicz, MD, Director of Addiction Psychiatry Program, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

Eduardo Dunayevich, MD, Executive Director, Clinical Development, Amgen

Disclosure: Received salary from Amgen for employment; Received stock from Amgen for employment.

Additional Contributors

Barry I Liskow, MD, Professor of Psychiatry, Vice Chairman, Psychiatry Department, Director, Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic, The University of Kansas Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2015. UNODC. Available at http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr2015/World_Drug_Report_2015.pdf. May 2015; Accessed: March 31, 2016.
  2. Doherty MC, Garfein RS, Monterroso E. Correlates of HIV infection among young adult short-term injection drug users. AIDS. 2000 Apr 14. 14(6):717-26. [View Abstract]
  3. Williams I. Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the United States. Am J Med. 1999 Dec 27. 107(6B):2S-9S. [View Abstract]
  4. Boodram B, Hershow RC, Cotler SJ, Ouellet LJ. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection and increases in viral load in a prospective cohort of young, HIV-uninfected injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Dec 15. 119(3):166-71. [View Abstract]
  5. Des Jarlais DC, Hagan H, Arasteh K, et al. Can intranasal drug use reduce HCV infection among injecting drug users?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Dec 15. 119(3):201-6. [View Abstract]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2003. 2004. 15:
  7. Bennett GA, Velleman RD, Barter G. Gender differences in sharing injecting equipment by drug users in England. AIDS Care. 2000 Feb. 12(1):77-87. [View Abstract]
  8. Becker Buxton M, Vlahov D, Strathdee SA. Association between injection practices and duration of injection among recently initiated injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Aug 16. 75(2):177-83. [View Abstract]
  9. Petersen Z, Myers B, van Hout MC, Plüddemann A, Parry C. Availability of HIV prevention and treatment services for people who inject drugs: findings from 21 countries. Harm Reduct J. 2013 Aug 19. 10:13. [View Abstract]
  10. Macarthur GJ, van Velzen E, Palmateer N, Kimber J, Pharris A, Hope V, et al. Interventions to prevent HIV and Hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: A review of reviews to assess evidence of effectiveness. Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Aug 20. [View Abstract]
  11. Landau J, Garrett J, Shea RR. Strength in numbers: the ARISE method for mobilizing family and network to engage substance abusers in treatment. A Relational Intervention Sequence for Engagement. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 Aug. 26(3):379-98. [View Abstract]
  12. FDA Okays Handheld Autoinjector for Opioid Overdose. Medscape. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/823039. Accessed: April 3, 2014.
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States, by Race/Ethnicity, 2000-2004. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Supplemental report. 2006. 12 (1):
  14. Frontera JA, Gradon JD. Right-side endocarditis in injection drug users: review of proposed mechanisms of pathogenesis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Feb. 30(2):374-9. [View Abstract]
  15. Macalino GE, Springer KW, Rahman ZS. Community-based programs for safe disposal of used needles and syringes. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998. 18 Suppl 1:S111-9. [View Abstract]
  16. Coyle SL, Needle RH, Normand J. Outreach-based HIV prevention for injecting drug users: a review of published outcome data. Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun. 113 Suppl 1:19-30. [View Abstract]
  17. Deren S, Cleland CM, Fuller C, Kang SY, Des Jarlais DC, Vlahov D. The impact of syringe deregulation on sources of syringes for injection drug users: preliminary findings. AIDS Behav. 2006 Nov. 10(6):717-21. [View Abstract]
  18. Obadia Y, Feroni I, Perrin V. Syringe vending machines for injection drug users: an experiment in Marseille, France. Am J Public Health. 1999 Dec. 89(12):1852-4. [View Abstract]
  19. Tun W, Vu L, Adebajo SB, Abiodun L, Sheehy M, Karlyn A, et al. Population-based prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus, HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia in male injection drug users in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Jul 19. [View Abstract]
  20. Eskandarieh S, Nikfarjam A, Tarjoman T, Nasehi A, Jafari F, Saberi-Zafarghandi MB. Descriptive Aspects of Injection Drug Users in Iran's National Harm Reduction Program by Methadone Maintenance Treatment. Iran J Public Health. 2013. 42(6):588-93. [View Abstract]
  21. Aceijas C, Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Wiessing L, Stimson GV, Hickman M. Estimates of injecting drug users at the national and local level in developing and transitional countries, and gender and age distribution. Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Jun. 82 Suppl 3:iii10-17. [View Abstract]
  22. Aceijas C, Oppenheimer E, Stimson GV, Ashcroft RE, Matic S, Hickman M. Antiretroviral treatment for injecting drug users in developing and transitional countries 1 year before the end of the "Treating 3 million by 2005. Making it happen. The WHO strategy" ("3 by 5"). Addiction. 2006 Sep. 101(9):1246-53. [View Abstract]
  23. Ball AL, Rana S, Dehne KL. HIV prevention among injecting drug users: responses in developing and transitional countries. Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun. 113 Suppl 1:170-81. [View Abstract]
  24. Beck EJ, Mandalia S, Williams I. Decreased morbidity and use of hospital services in English HIV-infected individuals with increased uptake of anti-retroviral therapy 1996-1997. National Prospective Monitoring System Steering Group. AIDS. 1999 Oct 22. 13(15):2157-64. [View Abstract]
  25. Brunton C, Kemp R, Raynel P. Cumulative incidence of hepatitis C seroconversion in a cohort of seronegative injecting drug users. N Z Med J. 2000 Mar 24. 113(1106):98-101. [View Abstract]
  26. Carrieri MP, Moatti JP, Vlahov D. Access to antiretroviral treatment among French HIV infected injection drug users: the influence of continued drug use. MANIF 2000 Study Group. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan. 53(1):4-8. [View Abstract]
  27. Cherington M. Clinical spectrum of botulism. Muscle Nerve. 1998 Jun. 21(6):701-10. [View Abstract]
  28. Contoreggi C, Rexroad VE, Lange WR. Current management of infectious complications in the injecting drug user. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998 Mar-Apr. 15(2):95-106. [View Abstract]
  29. Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR. Fifteen years of research on preventing HIV infection among injecting drug users: what we have learned, what we have not learned, what we have done, what we have not done. Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun. 113 Suppl 1:182-8. [View Abstract]
  30. Gostin LO, Lazzarini Z, Jones TS. Prevention of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne diseases among injection drug users. A national survey on the regulation of syringes and needles. JAMA. 1997 Jan 1. 277(1):53-62. [View Abstract]
  31. Gowing L, Farrell M, Bornemann R. Substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. CD004145. [View Abstract]
  32. Hughes PH, Rieche O. Heroin epidemics revisited. Epidemiol Rev. 1995. 17(1):66-73. [View Abstract]
  33. Hughes RA. Drug injectors and the cleaning of needles and syringes. Eur Addict Res. 2000 Mar. 6(1):20-30. [View Abstract]
  34. Hulse GK, English DR, Milne E. The quantification of mortality resulting from the regular use of illicit opiates. Addiction. 1999 Feb. 94(2):221-9. [View Abstract]
  35. Kaye S, Darke S. A comparison of the harms associated with the injection of heroin and amphetamines. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 Feb 1. 58(1-2):189-95. [View Abstract]
  36. Lennings CJ. Harm minimization or abstinence: an evaluation of current policies and practices in the treatment and control of intravenous drug using groups in Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Jan 10-20. 22(1-2):57-64. [View Abstract]
  37. Lert F, Kazatchkine MD. Antiretroviral HIV treatment and care for injecting drug users: an evidence-based overview. Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Aug. 18(4):255-61. [View Abstract]
  38. Leshner AI. Science-based views of drug addiction and its treatment. JAMA. 1999 Oct 13. 282(14):1314-6. [View Abstract]
  39. Martin V, Cayla JA, Bolea A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in intravenous drug users on admission to prison. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Jan. 4(1):41-6. [View Abstract]
  40. Massad E, Rozman M, Azevedo RS. Seroprevalence of HIV, HCV and syphilis in Brazilian prisoners: preponderance of parenteral transmission. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 May. 15(5):439-45. [View Abstract]
  41. Mast EE, Alter MJ, Margolis HS. Strategies to prevent and control hepatitis B and C virus infections: a global perspective. Vaccine. 1999 Mar 26. 17(13-14):1730-3. [View Abstract]
  42. Mclean L, Sharma S. Mycotic pulmonary arterial aneurysms in an intravenous drug user. Canadian Respiratory J. 1998. 5(4):307-11.
  43. Metzger DS, Woody GE, McLellan AT. Human immunodeficiency virus seroconversion among intravenous drug users in- and out-of-treatment: an 18-month prospective follow-up. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993 Sep. 6(9):1049-56. [View Abstract]
  44. Moatti JP, Carrieri MP, Spire B. Adherence to HAART in French HIV-infected injecting drug users: the contribution of buprenorphine drug maintenance treatment. The Manif 2000 study group. AIDS. 2000 Jan 28. 14(2):151-5. [View Abstract]
  45. Molitor F, Ruiz JD, Flynn N. Methamphetamine use and sexual and injection risk behaviors among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 Aug. 25(3):475-93. [View Abstract]
  46. Neaigus A, Gyarmathy VA, Miller M, Frajzyngier V, Zhao M, Friedman SR. Injecting and sexual risk correlates of HBV and HCV seroprevalence among new drug injectors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jul 10. 89(2-3):234-43. [View Abstract]
  47. Powis B, Strang J, Griffiths P. Self-reported overdose among injecting drug users in London: extent and nature of the problem. Addiction. 1999 Apr. 94(4):471-8. [View Abstract]
  48. Rhodes F, Deren S, Wood MM. Understanding HIV risks of chronic drug-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 1999 Dec. 11(6):629-48. [View Abstract]
  49. Shapiro CN, Coleman PJ, McQuillan GM. Epidemiology of hepatitis A: seroepidemiology and risk groups in the USA. Vaccine. 1992. 10 Suppl 1:S59-62. [View Abstract]
  50. Smith AM, Lindsay J, Rosenthal DA. Same-sex attraction, drug injection and binge drinking among Australian adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Dec. 23(6):643-6. [View Abstract]
  51. Smith DK, Grohskopf LA, Black RJ. Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States: recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Jan 21. 54(RR-2):1-20. [View Abstract]
  52. Stimson GV, Fitch C, Rhodes T. The rapid assessment and response guide on injecting drug use. World Health Organization, Substance Abuse Department; 1998.
  53. Strang J, Powis B, Best D. Preventing opiate overdose fatalities with take-home naloxone: pre-launch study of possible impact and acceptability. Addiction. 1999 Feb. 94(2):199-204. [View Abstract]
  54. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. The NSDUH report: Demographic and Geographic Variations in Injection Drug Use. 2007.
  55. Thorne LB, Collins KA. Speedballing with needle embolization: case study and review of the literature. J Forensic Sci. 1998 Sep. 43(5):1074-6. [View Abstract]
  56. UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update: Special Report on HIV/AIDS. December 2006.
  57. UNAIDS. Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic 2006. May, 2006.
  58. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2007 World Drug Report.
  59. Vlahov D, Junge B. The role of needle exchange programs in HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun. 113 Suppl 1:75-80. [View Abstract]
  60. White JM, Irvine RJ. Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose. Addiction. 1999 Jul. 94(7):961-72. [View Abstract]
  61. Whynot EM. Women who use injection drugs: the social context of risk. CMAJ. 1998 Aug 25. 159(4):355-8. [View Abstract]