Large-Bowel Obstruction


Practice Essentials

Large-bowel obstruction (LBO) is an emergency condition that requires early identification and intervention. It is important to distinguish colonic obstruction from ileus, as well as to distinguish true mechanical obstruction from pseudo-obstruction; treatment differs. See the image below. 

View Image

Contrast study demonstrates colonic obstruction at the level of the splenic flexure, in this case due to carcinoma. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J M....

See Can't-Miss Gastrointestinal Diagnoses, a Critical Images slideshow, to help diagnose the potentially life-threatening conditions that present with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Signs and symptoms

A history of bowel movements, flatus, obstipation, and associated symptoms should be obtained. Complaints in patients with LBO may include the following:

Other symptoms that may be diagnostically significant include the following:

Assessment of symptoms should attempt to distinguish the following:

Although a complete physical examination is necessary, the examination should place special emphasis on the following key areas:

See Presentation for more detail.


The following laboratory studies may be helpful:

Imaging modalities that may be considered are as follows:

See Workup for more detail.


Initial therapy in patients with suspected LBO includes the following:

The following are emergencies that call for surgical intervention:

Ileus is treated as follows:

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is treated as follows:

Volvulus is treated as follows:

Intussusception is treated as follows:

Colonic masses and strictures are treated as follows:

Diverticular disease is treated as follows:

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.


Large-bowel obstruction (LBO) is an emergency condition that requires early identification and intervention. The etiology of this condition is age-dependent, and it can result either from mechanical interruption of the flow of intestinal contents (see the following image) or from dilation of the colon in the absence of an anatomic lesion (pseudo-obstruction). Causes include neoplasms, inflammatory processes (diverticulitis), strictures, fecal impaction or volvulus.

View Image

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) film of a patient with obstipation. Dilatation of the colon is associated with large-bowel obstruction. Radiog....

It is important to distinguish colonic obstruction from ileus and to differentiate between true mechanical obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. Treatment differs.[1]

Colonic obstruction is more common in elderly individuals as a consequence of the higher incidence of neoplasms and other causative diseases in this population.[2] In neonates, colonic obstruction may be caused by an imperforate anus or other anatomic abnormalities. Obstruction may also be secondary to meconium ileus. In the pediatric population, Hirschsprung disease can resemble colonic obstruction.

For patient education information, see Digestive Disorders Center as well as Constipation in Adults and Abdominal Pain in Adults.

See also Ogilvie Syndrome, Ileus, Constipation, Small Bowel Obstruction, and Intussusception.


The prevalence of mechanical large-bowel obstruction (LBO) increases with age, as does that of its main causes, colon cancer and diverticulitis. Sigmoid volvulus and cecal volvulus are also potential causes of this disorder.[3]

Mechanical LBO causes bowel dilatation above the obstruction, which in turn, causes mucosal edema and impaired venous and arterial blood flow to the bowel. Bowel edema and ischemia increase the mucosal permeability of the bowel, which can lead to bacterial translocation, systemic toxicity, dehydration, and electrolyte abnormalities. Bowel ischemia can lead to perforation, fecal soilage of the peritoneal cavity, and dead bowel.

In cases of closed loop obstructions, such as colonic obstruction in the presence of a closed ileocecal valve or incarcerated hernia, this process may be accelerated.

The pathophysiology of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), or Ogilvie syndrome, is not clear, but it is thought to result from an autonomic imbalance, which results from decreased parasympathetic tone or excessive sympathetic output.[1, 4] This condition usually occurs in the setting of a wide range of medical or surgical illnesses. If it goes untreated, colonic ischemia or perforation can occur. ACPO is characterized by a loss of peristalsis and results in the accumulation of gas and fluid in the colon. The right colon and cecum are most commonly involved. The risk of perforation for ACPO ranges from 3% to 15%.[5]


The most common causes of  large-bowel obstructions (LBO) are colon carcinoma and volvulus.[6] Approximately 60% of mechanical LBOs are caused by malignancies, 20% are caused by diverticular disease, and 5% are the result of colonic volvulus.[1, 7, 8] The most common causes of adult large-bowel obstruction are as follows:

Neoplasms and diverticular disease

Obstructions caused by tumors tend to have a gradual onset and result from tumor growth narrowing the colonic lumen.

Diverticulitis is associated with muscular hypertrophy of the colonic wall. Repetitive episodes of inflammation cause the colonic wall to become fibrotic and thickened, leading to luminal narrowing.


A colonic volvulus results when the colon twists on its mesentery, which impairs the venous drainage and arterial inflow. Symptoms of this condition are usually abrupt. The cecum and sigmoid colon are most commonly affected.

Volvulus typically occurs in elderly, debilitated individuals; patients living in an institutionalized setting; or patients with a history of chronic constipation.Volvulus may also be seen during pregnancy, most commonly occurring in the third trimester when the gravid uterus displaces the colon.[9]


Intussusception is primarily a pediatric disease; however, it is estimated that 5-16% of all intussusceptions in the Western world occur in adults. Two thirds of adult intussusception cases are caused by tumors. Two main types of intussusception affect the large bowel: enterocolic and colocolic.

Enterocolic intussusceptions involve both the small bowel and the large bowel. These are composed of either ileocolic intussusceptions or ileocecal intussusceptions, depending on where the lead point is located.

Colocolic intussusceptions involve only the colon. They are classified as either colocolic or sigmoidorectal intussusceptions.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome)

ACPO (Ogilvie syndrome) has many etiologies. ACPO is a functional obstruction; it is typically seen in elderly or debilitated patients who are hospitalized with severe medical or traumatic illnesses. Medications that decrease intestinal motility are also associated with this disorder. In a retrospective review of more than 1400 cases of ACPO, the most common predisposing conditions were operative and nonoperative trauma (11%), infections (10%), and cardiac disease (10-18%).[10, 11]


Mortality is determined by the patient's overall medical condition and the presence of any comorbidities that may influence the patient's surgical risk. If large bowel obstruction is treated early, the outcome is generally good. Mortality is higher in patients who have developed bowel ischemia or perforation. After surgical decompression, the prognosis is determined by the underlying disease. In general, overall mortality for large-bowel obstruction ( is 20%, which increases to 40% if there is colonic perforation.

Mortality for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO; Ogilvie syndrome) is 15% with early care; it increases to 36% if colonic ischemia or perforation develops.[5]

In a retrospective study, long-term outcomes of self-expandable metallic stenting for malignant colorectal obstruction in 42 elderly patients were excellent (97.6%), with shorter stents yielding longer event-free survival.[12]


Obtain the patient's history of bowel movements, flatus, obstipation (ie, no gas or bowel movement), and associated symptoms. Attempt to distinguish complete bowel obstruction from partial obstruction, which is associated with passage of some gas or stool. Also inquire about the patient's current and past history in an attempt to determine the most likely cause.

Major complaints in patients with large-bowel obstruction (LBO) include abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, and crampy abdominal pain. An abrupt onset of symptoms makes an acute obstructive event (eg, cecal or sigmoid volvulus) a more likely diagnosis. A history of chronic constipation, long-term cathartic use, and straining at stools implies diverticulitis or carcinoma.

Changes in the patient's caliber of stools strongly suggest carcinoma. When associated with weight loss, the likelihood of neoplastic obstruction increases.

When giving a history of obstipation, patients may state that pants or belts are not fitting properly.

A history of recurrent left-lower-quadrant abdominal pain over several years is more consistent with diverticulitis, a diverticular stricture, or similar problems.

A history of aortic surgery suggests the possibility of an ischemic stricture.

Complete obstruction vs partial obstruction vs ileus

Complete obstruction is characterized by the failure to pass either stool or flatus with an empty rectal vault (unless the obstruction is in the rectum). If the patient has a partial obstruction, the patient appears obstipated but continues to pass some gas or stools. Partial obstructions are a less urgent condition.

LBO from an anatomic abnormality leads to colonic distention, abdominal pain, anorexia, and, late in the course, feculent vomiting. Persistent vomiting may result in dehydration and electrolyte disturbances. Pneumaturia, mucinuria, or fecaluria may occur if fistulization of the sigmoid colon to the bladder occurs. This is most often seen in the setting of diverticulitis or cancer.

LBO is typically characterized by a slow onset of symptoms and may not cause vomiting despite a markedly distended bowel.

Paralytic ileus can be seen in the setting of peritonitis or traumatic injury. Bowel sounds are diminished, and abdominal cramping is less common.

Colonic lesion development history

Right-side colonic lesions can grow quite large before obstruction occurs because of the large capacity of the right colon and soft stool consistency. Sigmoid colon and rectal tumors cause colonic obstruction much earlier in their development, because the colon is narrower and the stool is harder in that area.

Obstruction secondary to intussusception

Patients may describe intermittent, crampy abdominal pain that is colicky and relieved by assuming fetal position. Weight loss and fatigue are common.

Obstruction secondary to ACPO

Symptoms of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO;  Ogilvie syndrome) are similar to those of LBO and usually develop over 3-7 days or, less commonly, over 24-48 hours. Abdominal distention is the earliest sign. Late symptoms are similar to those seen with LBO. Nausea and vomiting are not predominant complaints, but fever may be present in the setting of colonic ischemia or perforation.

Physical Examination

Although a complete physical examination is necessary, key elements of the physical examination should focus on a thorough examination of the abdomen, groin, and rectum.

Abdominal examination

Perform the examination in standard fashion, that is, inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation.

Abdominal distention may be significant in patients with a large-bowel obstruction (LBO). The bowel sounds may be normal early on but usually become quiet, and the abdomen is hyperresonant to percussion.

Palpation of the abdomen may reveal tenderness. Fever, severe tenderness, and abdominal rigidity are ominous signs that suggest peritonitis secondary to perforation. The cecum is the area most likely to perforate (according to the Laplace law stating that in a long pliable tube, the site of largest diameter requires the least pressure to distend[13] ; thus, in a distal LBO, with a competent ileocecal valve, the cecum is the most common site of perforation).

The presence of true involuntary guarding or peritoneal signs may be indicative of another intra-abdominal process, such as an abscess. Rebound tenderness is best elicited by having the patient cough or by shaking the bed.

Sigmoid diverticulitis and a perforated sigmoid secondary to carcinoma are clinically difficult to differentiate. Guaiac-positive stool may be seen with carcinoma or diverticulitis.

A rectal or lower sigmoidal mass may be palpated on rectal examination. An abdominal mass or fullness may be palpated if a tumor is present in the cecum.

Examination of inguinal and femoral regions

Evaluation of the inguinal and femoral regions should be an integral part of the examination in a patient with suspected large-bowel obstruction.

Incarcerated hernias represent a frequently missed cause of bowel obstruction. In particular, colonic obstruction is often caused by a left-sided inguinal hernia with the sigmoid colon incarcerated in the hernia.[14]  Any old surgical scar should also be examined for the possibility of an incarcerated incisional hernia. 

Digital rectal examination

Perform a digital rectal examination (DRE) to verify the patency of the anus in a neonate. The examination focuses on identifying rectal pathology that may be causing the obstruction and determining the contents of the rectal vault.

Hard stools suggest impaction; soft stools suggest obstipation. An empty vault suggests obstruction proximal to the level that the examining finger can reach.

Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) should be performed. A positive result may suggest the possibility of a more proximal neoplasm.

Approach Considerations

Given the potential morbidity and mortality associated with large-bowel obstruction (LBO), the recommended diagnostic approach focuses on rapid evaluation and prompt surgical consultation. Relief of pain, control of vomiting, and correction of fluid and electrolyte abnormalities should occur simultaneously with diagnostic evaluation.

Laboratory studies are used to assess the degree of dehydration and electrolyte imbalance and to evaluate for infection, anemia, and ischemia. Radiographic studies are used to confirm obstruction, to identify its cause if present, and to idenitify other pathology that may be causing the patient's symptoms. 

Laboratory Studies

Laboratory studies are directed at evaluating the dehydration and electrolyte imbalance that may occur as a consequence of large-bowel obstruction (LBO), as well as at ruling out ileus as a diagnosis.

Routine complete blood cell (CBC) count, serum chemistries, and urinalysis should be evaluated. A serum lactate level should be ordered if bowel ischemia is a consideration. A decreased hematocrit level, particularly with evidence of chronic iron-deficiency anemia, may suggest chronic lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, particularly due to colon cancer. A stool guaiac test should be performed.

Obtain a prothrombin time (PT) as well as a type and crossmatch.

Although bowel obstruction, or even constipation, may mildly elevate the white blood cell (WBC) count, substantial leukocytosis should prompt reconsideration of the diagnosis or increase the suspicion for perforation. Ileus secondary to an intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal infection should also be considered.

Imaging Studies

Plain radiography

Although at times helpful in the evaluation of suspected bowel obstruction, plain radiography has largely been supplanted by computed tomography (CT) scanning owing to the latter's abilily to provide far more accurate and detailed images of the relevant pathology.[15]

An upright chest radiograph is useful to screen for free air (see the image below), which would suggest perforation and ileus rather than obstruction. Flat and upright abdominal radiographs can help distinguish severe constipation from bowel obstruction. Plain films may also help localize the site of obstruction (large vs small bowel).

View Image

This chest radiograph demonstrates free air under the diaphragm, indicating bowel perforation in a patient with large-bowel obstruction. Radiograph co....

Sigmoid or cecal volvulus may have a kidney-bean appearance on the abdominal films (see the images below). Intramural air is an ominous sign that suggests colonic ischemia. The absence of free air does not exclude perforation (this finding may be absent in half of all perforations).

View Image

Massive dilatation of the colon due to a sigmoid volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

View Image

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) radiograph depicting massive dilatation of the colon due to a cecal volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J....

Contrast studies include an enema with water-soluble contrast (eg, Gastrografin) (see the images below). Contrast studies that reveal a column of contrast ending in a "bird's beak" are suggestive of colonic volvulus.

View Image

Gastrografin study in a patient with obstipation reveals colonic obstruction at the rectosigmoid level. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

View Image

Contrast study of patient with cecal volvulus. The column of contrast ends in a "bird's beak" at the level of the volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Cha....

View Image

Contrast study demonstrates colonic obstruction at the level of the splenic flexure, in this case due to carcinoma. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J M....

Computed tomography

CT scanning is the imaging modality of choice if a colonic obstruction is clinically suspected; this imaging modality can confirm the diagnosis and identify the cause of large-bowel obstruction.[6, 15]  Contrast-enhanced CT (oral and intravenous) can help to delineate between partial and complete obstruction, ileus, and small-bowel obstruction, as well as exclude large-bowel obstruction. Gastrografin (water-soluble contrast) should be used preferentially if bowel perforation is suspected. Multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning is particularly useful in identifying the site and cause of obstruction as well as any related complications.[16]

Magnetic resonance imaging

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of gastrointestinal motility has evolved and shows promise for clinical assessment of gastric, small intestinal, and colonic motility in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, pseudo-obstruction, and functional bowel disorders.[17] Its advantages include it being a quick, noninvasive imaging modality; the absence of ionizing radiation; and its capability for visualizing the entire gastrointestinal tract.[17]  More investigation is needed.

Approach Considerations

Initial therapy in patients with suspected large-bowel obstruction (LBO) includes volume resuscitation, appropriate preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics, and timely surgical consultation.

A nasogastric tube should be considered for patients with severe colonic distention and vomiting. The patient's intravascular volume is usually depleted, and early intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation with isotonic saline or lactated Ringer solution is necessary.

Surgical intervention is frequently indicated, depending on the cause of the obstruction. Closed loop obstructions, bowel ischemia, and volvulus are surgical emergencies.

Transfer to another facility is indicated if adequate surgical management or backup is not available.


Adynamic ileus is treated with conservative measures. This involves correction of fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and treatment of the underlying disorder. Nasogastric decompression may be helpful if the patient is vomiting. Medications that slow colonic motility should be stopped, if possible.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction

If no perforation is present, acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO; Ogilvie syndrome) is treated with conservative management for the first 24 hours. This includes bowel rest, hydration, and management of underlying disorders.

Pharmacologic treatment of ACPO with neostigmine or colonoscopic decompression may be effective in cases that do not resolve with conservative management.[18] Colonoscopic decompression may be successful in as many as 80% of patients with ACPO.[10]

Surgical intervention for ACPO is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. This treatment is reserved for refractory cases or cases complicated by perforation.[10]


Endoscopic reduction and decompression of a sigmoid volvulus can be performed in the absence of peritoneal signs. This procedure is also contraindicated when evidence of mucosal ischemia is present on endoscopy. An experienced person should perform the procedure.

Recurrence after decompression is as high as 50%; thus, surgical resection is indicated. In healthy patients who have undergone successful decompression, an elective resection should follow. Emergency surgery is indicated in patients with evidence of perforated or ischemic bowel, or if attempts at endoscopic reduction and decompression are not successful.

The preferred treatment for cecal or transverse colon volvulus is surgical resection and anastomosis. Endoscopic detorsion and decompression is an option when the patient is a poor surgical candidate.


A contrast enema (barium or air) can successfully reduce 60-80% of intussusceptions. It is often successful in children in whom a pathologic leading point for the intussusception is unlikely. This procedure should be performed by an experienced radiologist, because the risk of perforation is significant.

In adults, a pathologic leading point for the intussusception is usually present. Reduction with a contrast enema is far less likely, and patients are more likely to require surgery.

Surgery is indicated if there are signs of peritonitis or bowel perforation, or if attempts at reduction by contrast enema are unsuccessful.

Intussusception may recur in approximately 3% of patients after contrast enema reduction and 1% of patients after operative repair.

Colonic Masses and Strictures

Endoscopic dilation and stenting of colonic obstruction is helpful in selected cases and may be an alternative to multistage surgery.[19] The procedure may be palliative in a high-risk patient with an unresectable malignancy, or it may be preparatory to surgical resection.[19, 20]

In cases where the stent is deployed before surgery, this procedure permits relief of the acute obstruction and resuscitation of the patient, and it allows for mechanical bowel preparation before colonic resection and reanastomosis, thus avoiding temporary or permanent colostomy.

In a retrospective study (2010-2013) that evaluated short-term results of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) used as palliation (n = 127) and bridge to surgery (n = 112) for malignant large-bowel obstruction (MLBO), Kobborg et al reported an 82.8% success rate in the palliation group and a 80.4% success rate in the bridge to surgery group, with respective 30-day mortality rates of 11.8% and 5.4%.[21]  Stent-related complications were similar for both groups (20.4% vs 17.8%, respectively).

In a study aimed at determining long-term outcomes of colonic stent insertion followed by surgery for MLBO, Matsuda et al found that in analyses of all patients and patients who underwent curative resection, disease-free survival and recurrence did not differ significantly between bridge to surgery (BTS) and emergency surgery groups.[22] . After a comprehensive literature search to identify studies comparing long-term outcomes between BTS and emergency surgery for MLBO, their meta-analysis included 11 studies with a total of 1136 patients. 

Use of a decompression tube may be a feasible, safe, and effective BTS for acute malignant left-side colonic obstruction.[23] Surgical treatment of left colon carcinoma includes resection without primary anastomosis or resection with primary anastomosis and intraoperative lavage.[24, 25] Endoscopically placed SEMS can be used to relieve the large-bowel obstruction, thus allowing a primary colorectal anastomosis.[26]

In a randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether stent insertion improved quality of life and survival in comparison with surgical decompression in patients with malignant incurable LBO (N=52), Young et al found that stent use in patients with incurable LBO conferred a number of advantages, including faster return to diet, decreased stoma rates, reduced postprocedure stay, and some quality-of-life benefits.[27]

Right-side colonic obstructions are treated with a right colectomy and a primary anastomosis between the ileum and the transverse colon. Patients with high-risk features for surgery (advanced age, complete obstruction, or severe comorbidities) may benefit from stent placement until the patient can be optimized for a surgical procedure.[28, 29] Palliative colorectal stents are an option in patients who are poor surgical candidates or have advanced cancer.[30, 31]

Endoscopic dilation and stenting of colonic obstruction should be performed only by an endoscopist experienced in such procedures. Surgical consultation and backup should be available, as the risk of perforation is increased during attempts at such procedures, with a potentially catastrophic result. Studies in recent years have identified the following as predictive factors for outcomes after SEMS for LBO:

In addition, SEMS appears to significantly improve histopathologic edema as compared with transanal drainage tube and emergency surgery after failure of decompression for malignant colorectal obstruction.[33]


Patients with persistent obstruction secondary to diverticular disease despite appropriate medical management are treated surgically. Surgical resection follows the same principles as the treatment of carcinomas. Elective colonic resection is offered to patients with recurrent disease.

Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

For obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) with rectocele, surgery is a last resort.

In a study of 90 rectocele patients with functional constipation, 64 responded to treatment with fiber supplements and biofeedback training with significant improvements in ODS symptoms, including 15 of the 17 patients with rectocele and concomitant intussusception[34] ; the remaining 26 required surgical intervention. Median cumulative ODS scores improved significantly, from 15.0 before treatment to 10.5 after treatment in the medical management group and from 13.5 before surgery to 10.5 after surgery in the surgical intervention group.


The morbidity and mortality of large-bowel obstruction (LBO) are often related to the surgical procedure used to relieve the colonic obstruction and, in the long term, to the underlying disease that caused the obstruction. Thus, complications may include the following:


Aggressive screening for colorectal cancer in individuals who are older than 50 years or who have a strong family history of colorectal cancer, as indicated by current guidelines, should reduce the future incidence of malignant colonic obstruction.

Long-Term Monitoring

Care after discharge following surgical management of large-bowel obstruction (LBO) focuses on surgical convalescence and, if relevant, the need to care for the disease that caused the obstruction.

If the patient has received a colostomy or ileostomy, a decision regarding whether it is temporary or permanent may have been made at the time of discharge, depending on the patient's diagnosis, comorbidity, and postoperative convalescence.

In addition, the remaining colon, both proximally and distally, must be evaluated radiographically or endoscopically to rule out synchronous colonic lesions, such as neoplasms.

Medication Summary

Bowel obstruction frequently necessitates surgical intervention. However, antibiotics should be started in the emergency department. Coverage must include gram-negative aerobic and gram-negative anaerobic organisms. The following antibiotics do not represent an all-inclusive list.

Clindamycin (Cleocin)

Clinical Context:  Clindamycin is a lincosamide that is useful in treating serious skin and soft-tissue infections caused by most staphylococcal strains. This agent is also effective against aerobic and anaerobic streptococci, except enterococci.

Clindamycin acts by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis via inhibition of the peptide chain initiation at the bacterial ribosome, where it preferentially binds to 50S ribosomal subunit, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth.

Metronidazole (Flagyl)

Clinical Context:  Metronidazole is an imidazole ring-based antibiotic active against various anaerobic bacteria and protozoa. This agent is used in combination with other antimicrobial agents (but used alone in Clostridium difficile enterocolitis).

Cefoxitin (Mefoxin)

Clinical Context:  Cefoxitin is a second-generation cephalosporin that is indicated for the management of infections caused by susceptible gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods. This agent is effective against aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative organisms.


Clinical Context:  Second-generation cephalosporin indicated for management of infections caused by susceptible gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods.

Imipenem and cilastatin (Primaxin)

Clinical Context:  The combination of imipenem and cilastatin is effective against aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative organisms.

Meropenem (Merrem I.V.)

Clinical Context:  Meropenem is a bactericidal broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic that inhibits cell-wall synthesis. This agent is effective against most gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria

Piperacillin-tazobactam (Zosyn)

Clinical Context:  Piperacillin-tazobactam inhibits the biosynthesis of cell wall mucopeptide and is effective during the stage of active multiplication. It has antipseudomonal activity.

Class Summary

Antibiotic therapy must cover all likely pathogens in the context of this clinical setting.


Christy Hopkins, MD, MPH, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine; Medical Director, Division of Emergency Medicine, University Health Care

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Steven C Dronen, MD, FAAEM, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, LeConte Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


BS Anand, MD Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine

BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS Professor, Chair, Department of Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Development in Research, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Gastroenterological Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Julian Katz, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine

Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Juan B Ochoa, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh; Medical and Scientific Director, HCN, Nestle Healthcare Nutrition

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joseph J Sachter, MD, FACEP Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center

Joseph J Sachter, MD, FACEP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physician Executives, American Medical Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment


  1. Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Bowel obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec. 32(4):1229-47. [View Abstract]
  2. Pujahari AK. Decision making in bowel obstruction: a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov. 10 (11):PE07-12. [View Abstract]
  3. Yeh EL, McNamara RM. Abdominal pain. Clin Geriatr Med. 2007 May. 23(2):255-70, v. [View Abstract]
  4. Saunders MD. Acute colonic pseudoobstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2004 Oct. 6(5):410-6. [View Abstract]
  5. Fazel A, Verne GN. New solutions to an old problem: acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan. 39(1):17-20. [View Abstract]
  6. Somwaru AS, Philips S. Imaging of uncommon causes of large-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov. 209 (5):W277-86. [View Abstract]
  7. Dite P, Lata J, Novotny I. Intestinal obstruction and perforation--the role of the gastroenterologist. Dig Dis. 2003. 21(1):63-7. [View Abstract]
  8. Flasar MH, Goldberg E. Acute abdominal pain. Med Clin North Am. 2006 May. 90(3):481-503. [View Abstract]
  9. Rabinovici R, Simansky DA, Kaplan O, Mavor E, Manny J. Cecal volvulus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Sep. 33(9):765-9. [View Abstract]
  10. De Giorgio R, Knowles CH. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Br J Surg. 2009 Mar. 96(3):229-39. [View Abstract]
  11. Batke M, Cappell MS. Adynamic ileus and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Med Clin North Am. 2008 May. 92(3):649-70, ix. [View Abstract]
  12. Imai M, Kamimura K, Takahashi Y, et al. The factors influencing long-term outcomes of stenting for malignant colorectal obstruction in elderly group in community medicine. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec 20. [View Abstract]
  13. Slam KD, Calkins S, Cason FD. LaPlace's law revisited: cecal perforation as an unusual presentation of pancreatic carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb 2. 5:14. [View Abstract]
  14. Sakorafas GH, Peros G. Obstructing sigmoid cancer in a patient with a large, tender, non-reducible inguinal hernia: the obvious diagnosis is not always the correct one. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan. 17(1):72-3. [View Abstract]
  15. Jaffe T, Thompson WM. Large-bowel obstruction in the adult: classic radiographic and CT findings, etiology, and mimics. Radiology. 2015 Jun. 275(3):651-63. [View Abstract]
  16. Gupta R, Mittal P, Mittal A, Gupta S, Mittal K, Taneja A. Spectrum of MDCT findings in bowel obstruction in a tertiary care rural hospital in Northern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov. 10 (11):TC01-04. [View Abstract]
  17. de Jonge CS, Smout AJPM, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J. Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: advances, challenges and opportunities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jan. 30 (1):[View Abstract]
  18. Saunders MD, Kimmey MB. Systematic review: acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Nov 15. 22(10):917-25. [View Abstract]
  19. Atukorale YN, Church JL, Hoggan BL, Lambert RS, Gurgacz SL, Goodall S, et al. Self-Expanding Metallic Stents for the Management of Emergency Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb. 20 (2):455-62. [View Abstract]
  20. Geraghty J, Sarkar S, Cox T, et al. Management of large bowel obstruction with self-expanding metal stents. A multicentre retrospective study of factors determining outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jun. 16 (6):476-83. [View Abstract]
  21. Kobborg M, Broholm M, Frostberg E, Jeppesen M, Gogenür I. Short-term results of self-expanding metal stents for acute malignant large bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct. 19 (10):O365-71. [View Abstract]
  22. Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of colonic stent as "bridge to surgery" and emergency surgery for malignant large-bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb. 22 (2):497-504. [View Abstract]
  23. Xu YS, Song T, Guo YT, et al. Placement of the decompression tube as a bridge to surgery for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec. 19 (12):2243-8. [View Abstract]
  24. Trompetas V. Emergency management of malignant acute left-sided colonic obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Apr. 90(3):181-6. [View Abstract]
  25. Deen KI, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: the University of Minnesota experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Dec. 187(6):573-6. [View Abstract]
  26. Fan YB, Cheng YS, Chen NW, et al. Clinical application of self-expanding metallic stent in the management of acute left-sided colorectal malignant obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 7. 12(5):755-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Young CJ, De-Loyde KJ, Young JM, et al. Improving Quality of Life for People with Incurable Large-Bowel Obstruction: Randomized Control Trial of Colonic Stent Insertion. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep. 58 (9):838-49. [View Abstract]
  28. Repici A, Adler DG, Gibbs CM, Malesci A, Preatoni P, Baron TH. Stenting of the proximal colon in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction: techniques and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov. 66(5):940-4. [View Abstract]
  29. Ptok H, Meyer F, Marusch F, et al. Palliative stent implantation in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun. 20(6):909-14. [View Abstract]
  30. Paul Olson TJ, Pinkerton C, Brasel KJ, Schwarze ML. Palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction from carcinomatosis: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr. 149(4):383-92. [View Abstract]
  31. Frago R, Ramirez E, Millan M, Kreisler E, del Valle E, Biondo S. Current management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2014 Jan. 207 (1):127-38. [View Abstract]
  32. Boyle DJ, Thorn C, Saini A, et al. Predictive factors for successful colonic stenting in acute large-bowel obstruction: a 15-year cohort analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar. 58 (3):358-62. [View Abstract]
  33. Takeyama H, Kitani K, Wakasa T, Tsujie M, Fujiwara Y, Mizuno S, et al. Self-expanding metallic stent improves histopathologic edema compared with transanal drainage tube for malignant colorectal obstruction. Dig Endosc. 2015 Dec 3. [View Abstract]
  34. Hicks CW, Weinstein M, Wakamatsu M, Savitt L, Pulliam S, Bordeianou L. In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort. Surgery. 2014 Apr. 155(4):659-67. [View Abstract]
  35. Young CJ, Zahid A. Randomised controlled trial of colonic stent insertion in non-curable large bowel obstruction: a post-hoc cost analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov 1. [View Abstract]

Contrast study demonstrates colonic obstruction at the level of the splenic flexure, in this case due to carcinoma. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) film of a patient with obstipation. Dilatation of the colon is associated with large-bowel obstruction. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

This chest radiograph demonstrates free air under the diaphragm, indicating bowel perforation in a patient with large-bowel obstruction. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Massive dilatation of the colon due to a sigmoid volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) radiograph depicting massive dilatation of the colon due to a cecal volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Gastrografin study in a patient with obstipation reveals colonic obstruction at the rectosigmoid level. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Contrast study of patient with cecal volvulus. The column of contrast ends in a "bird's beak" at the level of the volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Contrast study demonstrates colonic obstruction at the level of the splenic flexure, in this case due to carcinoma. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

This chest radiograph demonstrates free air under the diaphragm, indicating bowel perforation in a patient with large-bowel obstruction. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) film of a patient with obstipation. Dilatation of the colon is associated with large-bowel obstruction. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Gastrografin study in a patient with obstipation reveals colonic obstruction at the rectosigmoid level. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Contrast study demonstrates colonic obstruction at the level of the splenic flexure, in this case due to carcinoma. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Abdominal (kidney-ureter-bladder [KUB]) radiograph depicting massive dilatation of the colon due to a cecal volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Contrast study of patient with cecal volvulus. The column of contrast ends in a "bird's beak" at the level of the volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.

Massive dilatation of the colon due to a sigmoid volvulus. Radiograph courtesy of Charles J McCabe, MD†.