Emergent Management of Ectopic Pregnancy

Back

Overview

Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy has been greatly improved by the advent of rapid serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) tests in the early 1980s and then the widespread adoption of transvaginal pelvic ultrasonography (TVUS) in the late 1980s.[1] Starting in the mid-1990s, the rise of bedside ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians has brought further improvements in time to diagnosis and treatment.

Currently, the approach focuses on diagnosing ruptured or suspected ectopic pregnancy versus normal (or failing) intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) by using early TVUS in the emergency department (ED). The process is as follows: first the physician must suspect the potential for a possible ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by obtaining a b-hCG measurement. Next determine the location of the pregnancy utilizing US. Ninety-eight percent of all ectopic pregnancies are implanted in the fallopian tube.[43] Finally, appropriate consultation and/or follow-up is then based on whether there are indeterminate results on ultrasonography such as pregnancies of unknown location (PULs) in relation to the discriminatory zone of serum b-hCG measurements.

Go to Ectopic Pregnancy, Ultrasonographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy, and Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy for complete information on these topics.

Ultrasonography

The most critical step in beginning the workup is to have a high clinical suspicion for ectopic pregnancy (eg, in any woman of childbearing age). After a positive urine pregnancy test, any necessary initial resuscitation, and physical examination (including pelvic examination to rule out an open cervical os or completed abortion), ultrasonography should be performed.[3] This initial sonogram should be obtained at the bedside by an emergency physician, where feasible.

Bedside pelvic sonography is the imaging test of choice to investigate early pregnancy complaints in the emergency department (ED). It is noninvasive, portable, repeatable, does not involve contrast or ionizing radiation, and can be performed concurrently with resuscitation of an unstable patient.[4]

The goals of bedside pelvic ultrasonography are to find a definitive intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), a definitive or suspected ectopic pregnancy, and findings indicative of failed IUP. Because ultrasonographic findings of early normal IUP development (<7 wk) are well correlated with beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, the absence of a normal IUP on the sonogram together with a β-hCG level above the discriminatory zone virtually rules out a normal IUP.

Pelvic sonography is usually conducted first with the transabdominal approach (which can reliably identify IUP at a β-hCG level above 6500 mIU/mL) and then with the transvaginal approach (which can extend the discriminatory zone down to 1500 mIU/mL). M-mode imaging is useful for measuring the fetal heart rate. Color Doppler ultrasonography can help identify some ectopic pregnancies by identifying a placental blood flow pattern in the adnexa.

A protocol using bedside emergency physician–performed transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) showed a large reduction in the incidence of discharged patients who later had ruptured ectopic pregnancies.[5] Emergency physician–performed ultrasonography has been shown to speed time to diagnosis compared to ultrasonography performed by a consulting obstetrician/gynecologist or by the radiology department.[6]

Experienced emergency physicians are sometimes able to correctly diagnose ectopic pregnancies initially missed by consulting obstetrician/gynecologists.[7] The only lawsuit found in a search of the WESTLAW nationwide litigation database concerning emergency physicians and ultrasonography was filed for failure to perform ED ultrasonography in an ectopic pregnancy that ruptured several days later.[8]

Hemodynamically unstable patients should first be scanned in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen; the finding of free fluid in Morison’s pouch in the right clinical setting by the emergency physician has been shown to decrease time to the operating room (OR).[9] Attention should be paid to the adnexa, even when an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is visualized, to rule out the rare heterotopic pregnancy, especially in patients with a history of assisted reproduction.

Ultrasonographic findings suggestive of ectopic pregnancy (empty uterus with a tubal ring, complex adnexal mass, or a moderate-to-large amount of free fluid) or a definite extrauterine pregnancy warrant an immediate gynecologic consult for medical or surgical treatment. Patients with evidence of a failed IUP should be followed up in consultation with gynecology for either repeat ultrasonography and serial β-hCG, dilation and curettage (D&C), or expectant management.

Patients with indeterminate ultrasonographic findings (empty uterus, gestational sac < 8 mm without a yolk sac) should have a β-hCG level drawn and should be followed up closely with gynecology to monitor serial β-hCG levels and ultrasonography. Although a certain percentage of pregnancies of unknown location (PULs) will eventually be diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy (15% in 1 study), these are much less likely to require surgical treatment than those diagnosed on the initial sonogram.

Patients with a live IUP on a sonogram are essentially ruled out for ectopic pregnancy, have a low risk of eventually aborting (about 9% in 1 study, higher if associated with vaginal bleeding[10] ), and can be discharged from the ED after routine further care.

A spectrum of ultrasonographic findings exists and can be categorized according to a variety of different schemes, depending on the experience of the sonographer and the institutional setting.

Go to Ultrasonographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy for complete information on this topic.

Intrauterine gestational sac containing yolk sac or fetal pole

A definitive IUP virtually rules out ectopic pregnancy (aside from heterotopic pregnancies). Keep in mind that interstitial or cornual pregnancies can appear intrauterine; however, they will be located eccentrically in the uterus, with a myometrial mantle (distance from the outer edge of the bright decidual layer to the outside border of the uterus) of less than 5 mm.[11]

Differentiating a cervical ectopic pregnancy from an impending spontaneous abortion can be difficult: the presence of fetal heart motion, a small hourglass-shaped uterus, and the absence of the “sliding sign” (in which the gestational sac slides against the cervix with gentle pressure from the ultrasound probe) are particularly helpful.[12]

Intrauterine gestational sac >16 mm without fetal pole or >8 mm without yolk sac, or intrauterine fetal pole >5 mm without heart motion

An intrauterine gestational sac larger than 16 mm without a fetal pole or larger than 8 mm without a yolk sac or an intrauterine fetal pole larger than 5 mm without heart motion is indicative of failed IUP. Although some patients with these findings are later diagnosed with live IUPs, they are also essentially ruled out for ectopic pregnancy.

Other findings suggestive of impending failure are a live IUP with a large amount of subchorionic hemorrhage (appearing as fluid separating the chorion from the endometrial lining) or a fetal heart rate of < 100 bpm. A gestational sac with a mean sac diameter less than 5 mm greater than the crown-rump length has an 80% risk of pregnancy loss.[13]

Extrauterine sac containing yolk sac or fetal pole, with or without heart motion

Although an extrauterine sac containing a yolk sac or a fetal pole, with or without heart motion, is definitive for ectopic pregnancy (see the image below), only 16-32% of ectopic pregnancies have this finding on TVUS.[14]



View Image

Endovaginal sonogram reveals complex mass outside uterus with small yolk sac present within. Mass is more echogenic than uterus above it and represent....

Tubal ring

A tubal ring is a thick-walled cystic structure in the adnexa, independent of the ovary and uterus, and is highly predictive of ectopic pregnancy.[15] It can sometimes be confused with a corpus luteum cyst when the ovary is not well visualized. The corpus luteum cyst wall tends to be thinner and less echogenic than the endometrium, and the cyst tends to contain clear fluid.[16] When surrounded by free fluid, it can sometimes be confused with a hemorrhagic ovarian cyst.[17]

Complex adnexal mass

A complex adnexal mass is the sign most frequently found in ectopic pregnancies.[18] It can be somewhat cystic-appearing or entirely solid in nature, surrounded by free fluid, and ill-defined. If it cannot be moved independently of the ovary, it is unlikely to be an ectopic pregnancy.[19]

Moderate amount of anechoic free fluid (or any echogenic free fluid)

The cul-de-sac (pouch of Douglas) must be assessed when a definitive IUP is absent. A small amount of free fluid is physiologic. A moderate amount of anechoic free fluid (tracking more than one third of the way up the posterior wall of the uterus), or any echogenic free fluid, has a higher chance of being ultimately diagnosed as an ectopic pregnancy.[20]

Double decidual sac sign (gestational sac < 8 mm without yolk sac or fetal pole)

Although the double decidual sac sign is considered diagnostic of IUP by experienced sonographers, it can easily be confused with the pseudogestational sac found in ectopic pregnancy (caused by breakdown of stimulated endometrial lining) and lead to incorrect ruling out of ectopic pregnancy.[14] The pseudogestational sac (seen in 10-20% of ectopic pregnancies[21] ) can be differentiated by its central location in the uterus, oval shape, thin echogenic rim, and lack of double decidual sac sign (see the image below).[13]



View Image

Pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy can be confused with embryonic demise. Pseudogestational sac is produced when ectopic pregnancy stimulates ....

Empty uterus without any of adnexal findings above

An empty uterus lacking any of the above adnexal findings may indicate an early IUP, completed abortion, or an ectopic pregnancy. In this case, a β-hCG above the discriminatory zone essentially rules out an early IUP, though it does not help diagnose or rule out ectopic pregnancy. A thin (< 8 mm) endometrial stripe appears somewhat predictive of eventual diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in patients with a β-hCG below 1000 mIU/mL,[22] but there is sufficient overlap with eventual failed IUPs and normal IUPs to make this finding is a poor diagnostic test.[23]

Other findings

Molar pregnancy, retained products of conception (as in an incomplete abortion), or a corpus luteum cyst (which can be difficult to differentiate from an ovarian ectopic pregnancy, but is far more common) may be found.

Other Diagnostic Imaging Modalities

Magnetic resonance imaging

Although most emergency departments (EDs) have more ready access to ultrasonography than to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the latter’s lack of ionizing radiation may give it a role to play in the broader workup of pregnant women with abdominal pain (eg, ruling out appendicitis). MRI could also be indicated in those rare cases where ultrasonography results are inconclusive as to whether a visualized pregnancy is intrauterine or interstitial.[24]

Computed tomography

Computed tomography (CT) scanning involves the use of a substantial amount of ionizing radiation. Accordingly, it is, at best, a third-line choice of diagnostic study for pregnant patients.

Laboratory Studies

Serum and urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin

The first laboratory test to obtain is a qualitative urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test, which can be performed rapidly at the bedside. The qualitative urine β-hCG value can be unreliable at low quantitative serum β-hCG levels (ie, < 75 mIU/mL); therefore, in cases of high clinical suspicion, a serum quantitative β-hCG level should be obtained.[25]

Serum β-hCG levels can definitively rule out pregnancy if negative, though there have been case reports of pathology-proven ruptured ectopic pregnancy and hemorrhagic shock despite an undetectable serum β-hCG.[26] In a series of symptomatic patients presenting to an urban emergency department (ED), the odds of having an ectopic pregnancy were more than twice as high in those with an initial serum β-hCG below 1500 mIU/mL than in those with an abnormal intrauterine gestation.[27]

Additionally, an upper cutoff value of 40,000 mIU/mL is 99% sensitive for ectopic pregnancy.[28] Because ruptured ectopic pregnancies have been reported at a wide range of β-hCG levels, the β-hCG level should not be a factor in determining whether or not transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) should be performed.

In the early stages of a normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), the serum β-hCG rises along a well-defined curve; therefore, serial β-hCG tests can be useful for determining the ultimate location of a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). The lower limit of the normal rise in β-hCG is 53% in 2 days.[29] A lower threshold, 35% rise over 2 days, would minimize the risk of intervening on a normal IUP. Unfortunately, 15% of PULs that ultimately turn out to be ectopic pregnancies will also meet this threshold.[30]

Although failed IUPs (spontaneous abortions) do not show a decrease in β-hCG along any well-defined curve, patients with a β-hCG level that falls more than 50% in 2 days are at low risk of having an ectopic pregnancy.[31]

Serum progesterone

Unlike β-hCG levels, serum progesterone levels tend to be stable over time during the first trimester, and concentrations are higher in a normal IUP. A single serum progesterone level has been used alone to discriminate between normal and failing IUPs, but it cannot accurately discriminate between IUPs and ectopic pregnancies.[32] It also cannot reliably diagnose ectopic pregnancy in conjunction with an indeterminate sonogram.[33]

Other laboratory tests

Research is ongoing concerning CA 125, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, vascular endothelial growth factor, and creatine kinase. None of them have yet shown superiority to serial β-hCG measurements in distinguishing between IUP and ectopic pregnancy.[34]

Other laboratory studies that should be obtained include the following:

Other Tests

Dilation and curettage

Dilation and curettage (D&C) can be used to rule out ectopic pregnancy by determining the presence of chorionic villi. The obvious drawback to its frequent use is that a certain number of normal intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) will be aborted. It may be an option in the further workup of PUL when the pregnancy is undesired.

Culdocentesis

Culdocentesis was previously used to diagnose a ruptured ectopic pregnancy by the presence of free fluid in the pouch of Douglas. However, ultrasonography is noninvasive and has largely replaced culdocentesis where available.

Diagnostic laparoscopy

Diagnostic laparoscopy formerly played an important role in ultimately diagnosing patients with pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). Today, with the rise of serial beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) measurements and ultrasonography, it is rarely performed. A recent case series of women with PUL found that only 1 of the 363 patients required diagnostic laparoscopy.[35]

Treatment & Management

 

Patients in shock require prehospital care to treat hypotension. Patients who have ultrasonographic findings suggestive of ectopic pregnancy or those who are clinically unstable at a location where pelvic ultrasonography is unavailable should be transferred to a facility that provides a higher level of care.

When an ectopic pregnancy is identified, medical or surgical treatment is provided as indicated. Those with ectopic pregnancy who require admission or surgery should be admitted to an obstetrics/gynecology service. 

Pharmacologic treatment

The current standard medical treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy consists of the administration of methotrexate (MTX).[36, 37, 38]  This decision to initiate MTX therapy should be made in conjunction with, if not by, the consulting obstetrician/gynecologist. The ideal candidate for medical treatment should have the following characteristics:

Absolute contraindications include existence of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), immunodeficiency, moderate-to-severe anemia, leucopenia, or thrombocytopenia, sensitivity to MTX, active pulmonary or peptic ulcer disease, clinically important hepatic or renal dysfunction, or breastfeeding.

Sonogram findings of an ectopic gestational sac greater than 4 cm in size, (or 3.5 cm if the ectopic pregnancy has fetal heart motion) on a sonogram, an initial beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) concentration higher than 5000 mIU/mL, and the presence of significant free fluid are indicators of likely failure of MTX therapy and therefore constitute relative contraindications.

The multiple-dose MTX regimen consists of daily 1 mg/kg doses, given intramuscularly (IM) on alternating days with leucovorin (folinic acid, which reduces side effects), until there is a 15% decline in β-hCG over 2 days. The single-dose MTX regimen consists of a 50 mg/m2 dose, followed by a repeat β-hCG on day 4; if the β-hCG level has declined by less than 15% between days 4 and 7, another 50 mg/m2 dose of MTX is given.

Both treatment regimens show an efficacy similar to surgical management for unruptured ectopic pregnancies in the ideal patient population. Common side effects include increase in abdominal girth, vaginal bleeding or spotting, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, stomatitis, and dizziness. Rare side effects include severe neutropenia, reversible alopecia, and pneumonitis.[36]

Surgical treatment

Surgical approaches to managing ectopic pregnancy when medical management is not possible or is ruled out by other associated medical conditions are described elsewhere (see Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy).

Consultations

Obstetrics/gynecology should be consulted as needed for ectopic pregnancies and for follow-up care of patients with failing or failed intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) or pregnancies of unknown location (PULs). Any patient who is clinically unstable should have the consultation in the emergency department (ED).

Obstetrics/gynecology or radiology should also be consulted for transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) as needed, according to institutional policy.

Outpatient monitoring

Patients with PULs should follow up with obstetrics/gynecology in 2 days for repeat β-hCG and ultrasonography. Patients with failing or failed IUPs should arrange for follow-up with obstetrics/gynecology for dilation and curettage (D&C) or expectant management. Patients receiving MTX in the ED should follow up with obstetrics/gynecology according to protocol.

In a retrospective study (1998-2006) of 161 women with successfully expectantly managed nonviable tubal ectopic pregnancies, median serum β-hCG clearance time was 19 days.[39]  Although not statistically significant, women who had an initially plateauing β-hCG levels in the declining phase appeared to take longer to clear β-hCG. These findings may have clinical implications regarding follow-up duration and expectant management in the setting of tubal ectopic pregnancies.[39]

Author

Thomas J Chi, MD, Director of Emergency Ultrasound, Middlesex Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Mark Zwanger, MD, MBA,

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jeter (Jay) Pritchard Taylor, III, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Clinical Instructor, Compliance Officer, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palmetto Richland Hospital

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Employed contractor - Chief Editor for Medscape.

Additional Contributors

Assaad J Sayah, MD, FACEP, Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, Cambridge Health Alliance

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Verena T Valley, MD, and Christopher A Fly, MD, to the development and writing of the source article.

References

  1. Cohen HL, Moore WH. History of emergency ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Apr. 23(4):451-8. [View Abstract]
  2. Gracia CR, Barnhart KT. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: decision analysis comparing six strategies. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar. 97(3):464-70. [View Abstract]
  3. Ghaneie A, Grajo JR, Derr C, Kumm TR. Unusual ectopic pregnancies: sonographic findings and implications for management. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jun. 34(6):951-62. [View Abstract]
  4. Mathlouthi N, Slimani O, Fatnassi A, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy : Prospective study about 200 cases. Tunis Med. 2013 Apr. 91(4):254-7. [View Abstract]
  5. Mateer JR, Valley VT, Aiman EJ, Phelan MB, Thoma ME, Kefer MP. Outcome analysis of a protocol including bedside endovaginal sonography in patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar. 27(3):283-9. [View Abstract]
  6. Blaivas M, Sierzenski P, Plecque D, Lambert M. Do emergency physicians save time when locating a live intrauterine pregnancy with bedside ultrasonography?. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Sep. 7(9):988-93. [View Abstract]
  7. Adhikari S, Blaivas M, Lyon M. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy using bedside transvaginal ultrasonography in the ED: a 2-year experience. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jul. 25(6):591-6. [View Abstract]
  8. Blaivas M, Pawl R. 269: Analysis of lawsuits filed against emergency physicians over bedside emergency ultrasound examination performance or interpretation over a 20-year period. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sept. 50(3):S85.
  9. Rodgerson JD, Heegaard WG, Plummer D, Hicks J, Clinton J, Sterner S. Emergency department right upper quadrant ultrasound is associated with a reduced time to diagnosis and treatment of ruptured ectopic pregnancies. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr. 8(4):331-6. [View Abstract]
  10. Juliano M, Dabulis S, Heffner A. Characteristics of women with fetal loss in symptomatic first trimester pregnancies with documented fetal cardiac activity. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug. 52(2):143-7. [View Abstract]
  11. DeWitt C, Abbott J. Interstitial pregnancy: a potential for misdiagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with emergency department ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jul. 40(1):106-9. [View Abstract]
  12. Gun M, Mavrogiorgis M. Cervical ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar. 19(3):297-301. [View Abstract]
  13. Dighe M, Cuevas C, Moshiri M, Dubinsky T, Dogra VS. Sonography in first trimester bleeding. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008 Jul-Aug. 36(6):352-66. [View Abstract]
  14. Patel MD. "Rule out ectopic": Asking the right questions, getting the right answers. Ultrasound Q. 2006 Jun. 22(2):87-100. [View Abstract]
  15. Brown DL, Doubilet PM. Transvaginal sonography for diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: positivity criteria and performance characteristics. J Ultrasound Med. 1994 Apr. 13(4):259-66. [View Abstract]
  16. Stein MW, Ricci ZJ, Novak L, Roberts JH, Koenigsberg M. Sonographic comparison of the tubal ring of ectopic pregnancy with the corpus luteum. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Jan. 23(1):57-62. [View Abstract]
  17. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Bowie JD. Adnexal ring sign and hemoperitoneum caused by hemorrhagic ovarian cyst: pitfall in the sonographic diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Nov. 173(5):1301-2. [View Abstract]
  18. Frates MC, Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Hornstein MD. Tubal rupture in patients with ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with transvaginal US. Radiology. 1994 Jun. 191(3):769-72. [View Abstract]
  19. Blaivas M. Color doppler in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the emergency department: is there anything beyond a mass and fluid?. J Emerg Med. 2002 May. 22(4):379-84. [View Abstract]
  20. Dart R, McLean SA, Dart L. Isolated fluid in the cul-de-sac: how well does it predict ectopic pregnancy?. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jan. 20(1):1-4. [View Abstract]
  21. Nyberg DA, Laing FC, Filly RA, Uri-Simmons M, Jeffrey RB Jr. Ultrasonographic differentiation of the gestational sac of early intrauterine pregnancy from the pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy. Radiology. 1983 Mar. 146(3):755-9. [View Abstract]
  22. Dart RG, Dart L, Mitchell P, Berty C. The predictive value of endometrial stripe thickness in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy who have an empty uterus at ultrasonography. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jun. 6(6):602-8. [View Abstract]
  23. Seeber B, Sammel M, Zhou L, Hummel A, Barnhart KT. Endometrial stripe thickness and pregnancy outcome in first-trimester pregnancies with bleeding, pain or both. J Reprod Med. 2007 Sep. 52(9):757-61. [View Abstract]
  24. Filhastre M, Dechaud H, Lesnik A, Taourel P. Interstitial pregnancy: role of MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan. 15(1):93-5. [View Abstract]
  25. Kalinski MA, Guss DA. Hemorrhagic shock from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy in a patient with a negative urine pregnancy test result. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jul. 40(1):102-5. [View Abstract]
  26. Grynberg M, Teyssedre J, Andre C, Graesslin O. Rupture of ectopic pregnancy with negative serum beta-hCG leading to hemorrhagic shock. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb. 113(2 Pt 2):537-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Kohn MA, Kerr K, Malkevich D, O'Neil N, Kerr MJ, Kaplan BC. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels and the likelihood of ectopic pregnancy in emergency department patients with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb. 10(2):119-26. [View Abstract]
  28. Marill KA, Ingmire TE, Nelson BK. Utility of a single beta HCG measurement to evaluate for absence of ectopic pregnancy. J Emerg Med. 1999 May-Jun. 17(3):419-26. [View Abstract]
  29. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Guo W. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul. 104(1):50-5. [View Abstract]
  30. Silva C, Sammel MD, Zhou L, Gracia C, Hummel AC, Barnhart K. Human chorionic gonadotropin profile for women with ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar. 107(3):605-10. [View Abstract]
  31. Dart RG, Mitterando J, Dart LM. Rate of change of serial beta-human chorionic gonadotropin values as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in patients with indeterminate transvaginal ultrasound findings. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec. 34(6):703-10. [View Abstract]
  32. Mol BW, Lijmer JG, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of single serum progesterone measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov. 13(11):3220-7. [View Abstract]
  33. Valley VT, Mateer JR, Aiman EJ, Thoma ME, Phelan MB. Serum progesterone and endovaginal sonography by emergency physicians in the evaluation of ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Apr. 5(4):309-13. [View Abstract]
  34. Cabar FR, Fettback PB, Pereira PP, Zugaib M. Serum markers in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct. 63(5):701-8. [View Abstract]
  35. Kirk E, Condous G, Van Calster B, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Rationalizing the follow-up of pregnancies of unknown location. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun. 22(6):1744-50. [View Abstract]
  36. [Guideline] Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov. 90(5 Suppl):S206-12. [View Abstract]
  37. Ustunyurt E, Duran M, Coskun E, Ustunyurt OB, Simsek H. Role of initial and day 4 human chorionic gonadotropin levels in predicting the outcome of single-dose methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Nov. 288(5):1149-52. [View Abstract]
  38. Capmas P, Fernandez H. Effectiveness of gefitinib in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Int J Womens Health. 2015. 7:673-6. [View Abstract]
  39. Helmy S, Mavrelos D, Sawyer E, et al. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (β- hCG) clearance curves in women with successfully expectantly managed tubal ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015. 10(7):e0130598. [View Abstract]
  40. Burgher SW, Tandy TK, Dawdy MR. Transvaginal ultrasonography by emergency physicians decreases patient time in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Aug. 5(8):802-7. [View Abstract]
  41. Tayal VS, Cohen H, Norton HJ. Outcome of patients with an indeterminate emergency department first-trimester pelvic ultrasound to rule out ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Sep. 11(9):912-7. [View Abstract]
  42. Song T, Kim MK, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yun BS, Seong SJ. Single-dose versus two-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec 23. [View Abstract]
  43. Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec. 17(12):3224-30. [View Abstract]
  44. Ko JK, Cheung VY. Time to revisit the human chorionic gonadotropin discriminatory level in the management of pregnancy of unknown location. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Mar. 33(3):465-71. [View Abstract]
  45. Feng C, Chen ZY, Zhang J, Xu H, Zhang XM, Huang XF. Clinical utility of serum reproductive hormones for the early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the first trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Feb. 39(2):528-35. [View Abstract]
  46. Wu G, Yang J, Xu W, Yin T, Zou Y, Wang Y. Serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin levels on day 12 after in vitro fertilization in predicting final type of clinical pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 2014 Mar-Apr. 59(3-4):161-6. [View Abstract]
  47. Rausch ME, Barnhart KT. Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun. 55(2):418-23. [View Abstract]
  48. Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, et al. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013 Aug. 68(8):571-81. [View Abstract]

Endovaginal sonogram reveals complex mass outside uterus with small yolk sac present within. Mass is more echogenic than uterus above it and represents ectopic pregnancy.

Pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy can be confused with embryonic demise. Pseudogestational sac is produced when ectopic pregnancy stimulates endometrium, with degeneration of central decidual reaction.

Endovaginal sonogram reveals complex mass outside uterus with small yolk sac present within. Mass is more echogenic than uterus above it and represents ectopic pregnancy.

Pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy can be confused with embryonic demise. Pseudogestational sac is produced when ectopic pregnancy stimulates endometrium, with degeneration of central decidual reaction.