Contact Granulomas

Back

Background

Contact granulomas are benign lesions usually located on the posterior third of the vocal fold, which corresponds to the vocal process of the arytenoid cartilage. Contact granulomas may occur unilaterally or bilaterally.

Granulomas of the larynx can be classified into 2 general groups: specific granulomas and nonspecific granulomas. Specific granulomas are rare and include granulomas caused by tuberculosis[1] and syphilis. Nonspecific granulomas are benign and are unilaterally or bilaterally located on the vocal processes of the vocal folds. Histologically, they resemble pyogenic granulomas.

See the image below.



View Image

Left vocal process granuloma on initial presentation (scope view of 70°).

Contact ulcers (or granulomas) historically were thought to be the result of voice abuse or misuse, and the granulomas of intubation or gastroesophageal reflux were separate subsets of these conditions. However, for all purposes, the appearance, symptomatology, and treatment of these nonspecific granulomas are identical; therefore, both subsets of nonspecific granulomas can be considered a single entity.

Chevalier Jackson first identified contact ulcers in 1928.[2] He collected 127 case reports dating to 1888. In 1935, Jackson and Jackson suggested a mechanical cause related to the hammer and anvil effect of the vocal processes colliding against each other, leading to superficial mucosal ulceration (the contact ulcer) and focal granulation tissue response.[3]

Problem

A contact granuloma is a pale or sometimes red mass located on the medial aspect of the vocal process of the arytenoid cartilage. Histologically, contact granulomas resemble pyogenic granulomas, which consist of chronic inflammatory infiltration with neovascularization and fibrosis covered by squamous epithelium.

Classic contact ulcers are thought to be the result of vocal misuse and abuse. With this etiology, the lesion most commonly is identified in men. These lesions often are similar in appearance to those found in patients after intubation (intubation granulomas) and in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.

Occasionally, a vocal process granuloma is identified in a patient for whom none of these factors are apparent. de Lima Pontes et al label this group idiopathic. The literature contains much confusion about this entity; however, for practical purposes, these lesions may be conceptualized as a group.

Etiology

Primary causes of contact granulomas may coexist in the same patient and include the following:

Factors that contribute to the development of contact granulomas include smoking, allergy, infections, postnasal drip, and chronic throat clearing. Psychosocial traits associated with development of contact granulomas include aggressive personality, introversion, depression, emotional tension, and/or cancerophobia.

Certain dietary factors may affect the laryngeal milieu, leading to a detrimental mucosal environment. These factors include consumption of caffeine, chocolate, alcohol, peppermint, spicy foods, and tomato products; high-fat diet; poor water intake; and use of tobacco products. However, a direct causal relationship in the formation of contact ulcers has not been established.

Differential diagnoses include carcinoma, granular cell tumor of the larynx, and sarcoid.

Pathophysiology

Contact granulomas are usually pale, pedunculated masses found on the medial or superior edge of the vocal process of the arytenoid cartilage; however, they may also be deep red, lobulated, and sessile. These lesions may be 2-lipped structures that fit the vocal process of the opposite side.

Contact ulcers occur when the thin mucosa overlying the firm cartilage of the vocal process is crushed repetitively against the opposite side, causing a breakdown of the mucosa. An ulcer forms, accompanied by granulation tissue formation. An object such as an endotracheal tube may cause the injury leading to granulomas, or granulomas may result secondary to chronic irritation (eg, persistent gastroesophageal reflux injury).

A study by Li et al suggested that a finding of arytenoid cartilage sclerosis signals the presence of contact granuloma. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning revealed that in patients with contact granuloma (41 with unilateral lesions and one with bilateral lesions), arytenoid cartilage sclerosis existed on 79.07% of the vocal folds with lesions, compared with 7.32% of those without lesions. The rate of arytenoid sclerosis associated with contact granuloma was also significantly greater than that for the lesion or nonlesion sides of vocal folds (13.11% or 2.56%, respectively) in patients with glottic laryngeal cancer or vocal cord leukoplakia without vocal process involvement.[4]

Presentation

Symptoms include the following:

The physician inquiry includes the following:

Indications

Even in relatively asymptomatic disease, treat the contact ulcer or vocal process granuloma to prevent growth and possible complications or sequelae of the inflammatory process, which include the following:

Surgical management of these lesions usually is frustrating because of a 37-50% recurrence rate. Surgical interventions are indicated for the following:

Relevant Anatomy

Apices of the arytenoid cartilages are composed of elastic cartilage, and the rest of the arytenoid cartilage is hyaline cartilage. The arytenoid cartilages begin to ossify at approximately age 30 years. Ulcer or granuloma occurs on the vocal process of the arytenoid cartilage. The vocal process accounts for the posterior third of the vocal cord where the vocal ligament attaches.

The mucosa covering the vocal processes of the arytenoid cartilage is a thin layer of stratified squamous epithelium. This thin layer of mucosa is susceptible to being crushed between any unyielding object (eg, an endotracheal tube, the opposite arytenoid) and the firm cartilage beneath the mucosa.

Contraindications

Surgery is discouraged as the initial management for 2 reasons. Surgery is associated with a high recurrence rate of 37-50%, which often leads to multiple surgeries that may still be unsuccessful. Surgery may also cause the granuloma to migrate, following the wound edge.

Other Tests

See the list below:

Diagnostic Procedures

See the list below:

Histologic Findings

Contact ulcers resemble pyogenic granulomas. Primarily, the ulcers consist of granulation tissue with edema and chronic inflammatory infiltration, neovascularization, and fibrosis covered by squamous epithelium or an ulcerated surface.

Medical Therapy

The primary management of vocal process contact ulcers or granulomas is conservative.

Surgical Therapy

Surgical treatment is usually reserved for cases in which other approaches fail, cancer is suspected, the lesion is a fibroepithelial polyp, or the airway is compromised.

Surgery may be frustrating because of the high recurrence rate (37-50%). Surgery may also cause the granuloma to migrate and to follow the wound edge.

If excision or biopsy is performed, use conservative measures to protect the base and the surrounding mucosa. Consider steroid injection into the base of the lesion (triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/mL).

At the time of surgery, injection of the ipsilateral thyroarytenoid or lateral cricoarytenoid muscles with botulinum toxin type A may be considered. Institute intensive perioperative antireflux therapy.

A further surgical modality that has recently been proposed is the use of a flash lamp pulse dye laser through the side port of a flexible laryngoscope. This procedure is performed in the office setting with topical analgesia. This particular laser interacts preferentially with red pigment, so it cauterizes the feeding vessels to the granuloma without epithelial injury. The long-term efficacy of this technique is not yet known and at this point may be considered investigational.  A KTP laser may also be used either in the clinic setting or in the operating room.

Preoperative Details

Prior to surgical intervention, advise the patient of the following options to increase the chance of favorable healing and to decrease the risk of granuloma recurrence.

Intraoperative Details

The precise surgical approach for removal or biopsy of the granuloma is controversial. A major goal is to avoid extending the injury. Some authors advocate subtotal removal to serially shrink the base. Others believe that cold-knife excision with protection of the surrounding mucosa suffices. Because of the vascular nature of a pyogenic granuloma, the laser also is advocated. If used, set the CO2 laser on a low-watt setting (1-3 W), with an adequate thermal relaxation time (0.1-second pulse with 0.5-second interval) to reduce collateral heat injury. For a KTP laser, use 8-10 watts, a 15 ms pulse, and a 2 Hz repetition rate, with a 400 nm bare fiber.

Postoperative Details

After surgery, the patient must observe the following guidelines to allow the wound to heal:

Follow-up

Provide follow-up care for the patient on a continuous basis, both for recurrence and for development of associated lesions on the true vocal folds. These associated lesions may occur secondary to similar factors that initiated the development of the granuloma.

Complications

See the list below:

Outcome and Prognosis

Outcome rates include the following:

A retrospective study by Lee et al analyzing 590 cases of contact granuloma found that long-term good response rates to various treatments were as follows[7] :

It was also found that surgical removal of granulomas was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate than was observation (37.1% vs 10.3%, respectively).[7]

A study by Jin et al indicated that spontaneous resolution of contact granulomas is more likely in female patients and for granulomas with a narrow base.[8]

Future and Controversies

The emerging role for botulinum toxin type A is overwhelming and may hold promise as a first-line therapy in conjunction with antireflux therapy and speech therapy.

The use of topical anti-inflammatory substances, such as mitomycin-C, may hold promise in operative cases, but more investigation is needed to confirm the efficacy of this therapy.

Use of absolute voice rest in the primary treatment of patients with contact ulcers is controversial. Some individuals believe that voice rest gives the larynx the lack of vocal process contact needed for the ulcer to heal. Others have argued that the goal should be to encourage the patient to speak correctly, using proper voice technique. They believe that modified voice rest under observation of a speech therapist helps the ulcer to heal and allows the patient to acquire those vocal habits that may prevent recurrence.

Others fear that absolute voice rest may cause too great a psychological burden, giving the message that silence is good and speaking is bad. Then, when the person speaks, hyperfunction may be exacerbated because the patient holds back and produces voice with inadequate breath support for fear of injury.

An investigational surgical modality is the use of a flash lamp pulse dye laser fiber, or some other laser that interacts with hemoglobin, through a side port of a flexible laryngoscope in the office setting. In the office, the larynx can be visualized using topical anesthesia, a flexible scope, and a bare laser fiber with a conical spread passed through a side channel to the lesion. The laser would ideally interact with the vascular core of the granuloma, leaving epithelium unaffected. The long-term outcome, overall success rate, and complications of this modality are not yet know, but may offer a viable alternative for granulomata that are poorly responsive to more conservative measures.

Author

James D Garnett, MD, Director of Voice and Swallowing Center, Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Stephen G Batuello, MD, Consulting Staff, Colorado ENT Specialists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;Cliexa;The Physicians Edge;Sync-n-Scale;mCharts<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: The Physicians Edge, Cliexa<br/> Received stock from RxRevu; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for consulting; .

Additional Contributors

John Schweinfurth, MD, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Mississippi Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Medscape Reference thanks Vijay R Ramakrishnan, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, for assistance with the video contribution to this article.

References

  1. Beham AW, Puellmann K, Laird R, Fuchs T, Streich R, Breysach C, et al. A TNF-regulated recombinatorial macrophage immune receptor implicated in granuloma formation in tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2011 Nov. 7(11):e1002375. [View Abstract]
  2. Jackson C. Contact ulcer of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1928. 37:227-30.
  3. Jackson C, Jackson CL. Contact ulcer of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol. 1935. 22:1-15.
  4. Li J, Tian S, Zou S, Wang Q, Tai X, Chen X. CT Study of the Arytenoid Cartilage in Patients with Laryngeal Contact Granuloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec. 157 (6):1013-6. [View Abstract]
  5. Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, Tang AL, Zehetner J, Leers JM, et al. A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug. 13(8):1422-9. [View Abstract]
  6. Yılmaz T, Kayahan B, Gunaydın RO, Kuscu O, Sozen T. Botulinum Toxin A for Treatment of Contact Granuloma. J Voice. 2016 Nov. 30 (6):741-3. [View Abstract]
  7. Lee SW, Hong HJ, Choi SH, et al. Comparison of treatment modalities for contact granuloma: a nationwide multicenter study. Laryngoscope. 2014 May. 124 (5):1187-91. [View Abstract]
  8. Jin YJ, Lee SJ, Lee WY, Jeong WJ, Ahn SH. Prognostic factors for prediction of follow-up outcome of contact granuloma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul. 271 (7):1981-5. [View Abstract]

Left vocal process granuloma on initial presentation (scope view of 70°).

This patient was evaluated for hoarseness after prolonged intubation. The lesion resolved with observation and proton pump inhibitor therapy. Video courtesy of Vijay R Ramakrishnan, MD.

Left vocal process granuloma on initial presentation (scope view of 70°).

Vocal process granuloma 2 months after initiation of antireflux therapy and speech therapy intervention in a patient who initially presented with left vocal process granuloma (scope view of 70°).

Vocal process granuloma 4 months after initiation of antireflux therapy and speech therapy intervention (scope view of 70°).

Flexible endoscopic view of contact ulcer in a patient upon presentation. The patient underwent surgical resection with recurrence prior to referral.

Resolution of contact granuloma 5 months after intensive antireflux therapy, speech therapy intervention, and botulinum toxin injection into left vocal fold (flexible endoscopic view). Note the small, red, residual spot.

24 hour pharyngeal pH probe study revealing moderate increase in acidity (decrease in pH) below 5.5 during the night.

This patient was evaluated for hoarseness after prolonged intubation. The lesion resolved with observation and proton pump inhibitor therapy. Video courtesy of Vijay R Ramakrishnan, MD.