Perinatal Drug Abuse and Neonatal Drug Withdrawal

Back

Background

The use and abuse of addictive drugs has occurred throughout many centuries. Only relatively recently have certain drugs under question become defined as "illicit." Many pregnant women use such medications without prior consideration to the adverse effects of these substances on their unborn children. The effects of chemicals, such as opiates, cocaine, nicotine, alcohol, and new recreational drugs, on fetal development have been seriously studied only in the last 40-50 years.

The difficulty in evaluating research in this area is enormous. Clear methods for differentiating drug use from drug abuse are not established. The question of whether the mere presence of the chemical in maternal serum results in fetal damage needs to be answered. Evaluating if the mother in question has told the whole truth about her drug use is difficult. Given the stigma of substance abuse during pregnancy, lack of disclosure by the mother to her health provider is common because such damaging information could ultimately lead to the separation of mother and child.

Many confounding factors may be recognized, such as the probability of polysubstance use and how this affects single-drug studies. Additionally, the fact that a mother has used an illicit drug (or even a legal substance such as alcohol or tobacco) intertwines with many other factors that can affect a child. Socioeconomic status, support systems, role of the father, lack of prenatal care, and the caregiving ability of the mother; all of these factors play tremendous roles in child development.

Mothers with a previous mental health admission, with a low skill level, with Aboriginal status, or who smoked during pregnancy were significantly more likely to have an infant with neonatal withdrawal syndrome. These infants were at greater risk of having substantiated child maltreatment allegation and for entering foster care.

These results show an important pathway into child maltreatment and the need for well-supported programs for women who use illicit drugs during pregnancy and long-term support after birth of the child.

In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a clinical report detailing the recommended guidelines for the management of neonatal drug withdrawal.[1]

Note that many states in the United States are decriminalizing marijuana use, for medical and nonmedical uses. An overall 9.8% of women self-report prepregnancy marijuana use, 4.2% during pregnancy, and 5.5% post pregnancy, primarily as a means of stress/anxiety relief or relief from vomiting or pain.[2]

Pathophysiology

Maternal alterations

Almost all drugs of abuse follow a similar mechanism of action in the adult brain; this mechanism alters the pathways for reward. Through complex neurochemical interactions, various chemicals act to increase dopaminergic pathways from the midbrain ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the striatum. Additionally, the NAc provides a negative feedback loop to the VTA using the inhibitory monoamine gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Blocking such a pathway also attenuates the reward mechanism in the adult brain.

Fetal alterations

Although the full spectrum of physical damage that drugs of abuse can cause cannot be documented, one thing is certain: the effect of maternal drug use on fetal brain development is the most critical and most studied effect. The two broad classes of fetal brain insult are as follows:

  1. In the first 20 weeks of gestation, damage can occur during cytogenesis and cell migration.
  2. In the second half of gestation, damage can occur during brain growth and differentiation.

Continuous abuse, especially during the first half of gestation, is likely to disrupt the complicated neural wiring and associative connections that allow the developing brain to learn and mature. Most drugs of abuse freely cross the placental barrier; however, damage to the fetus also can occur via indirect methods. In particular, the vasoconstrictive properties of cocaine have been discussed as a potential cause for the delivery of growth-retarded infants.

Etiology

Through multiple mechanisms, all drugs of abuse can cause molecular and cellular changes that ultimately lead to changes in neural migration, cell structure, neurotransmitter dynamics, and overall brain formation. These alterations are likely associated with a whole range of behavioral and cognitive changes. Maternal polydrug use is likely to be far more damaging than use of any single drug.

Ethanol

Alcohol produces teratogenic effects associated with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and its variations. The suggested pathway for teratogenicity involves a direct effect on the anterior neural tube and surrounding structures. This leads to decreased brain development as well as typical FAS facies. The continuum of clinical outcomes within this disorder is broad. From the most severe form (FAS) to milder forms, such as alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder [ARND]), issues of somatic growth, brain growth and development, and facial dysmorphisms can occur.

In animal models, evidence shows disruption in the hippocampus, cortical cytostructure, and neuronal migration. Changes in subsequent behavior in animal models reveal deficits in object permanence, increased distractibility, and delays in gross motor development.

Nicotine

Studies on in utero effects of nicotine have typically focused on low birth weight and smaller head circumference. Evidence suggests that nicotine causes more than 50% of all low birth weight babies.

Further studies on nicotine's effects on behavior and neurochemistry are eagerly anticipated.

Cocaine

Cocaine can freely cross the placental barrier. A widely held belief was that cocaine caused fetal hypoxia due to placental vasoconstriction.

Animal studies have shown disruptions in the neural and glial organization and migration.

Dopamine, serotonin, or both may mediate withdrawal from cocaine.

From a behavioral standpoint, cocaine has been shown to attenuate an animal's classic conditioning ability to noxious stimuli. Adult animal models of cocaine exposure tend to show a higher predisposition to self-administration for reward.

Opiates

In utero opioid exposure has consistently shown a decrease in nucleic acid synthesis and protein production in the brain, suggesting that overall brain growth is compromised. Effects on neurotransmitter concentrations and production have not been confirmed.

Behaviorally, prenatally exposed animals tend to show decreased exploration and increased response latency to noxious stimuli.

Epidemiology

United States data

The definitions of maternal drug abuse and newborn withdrawal syndrome have been difficult to standardize (see Background). Therefore, documented disease prevalence varies tremendously. The prevalence of prenatally exposed newborns to one or more illicit drugs averages approximately 5.5%, with a range of 1.3-50%. Variations depend on the geographical detail (eg, local vs state) as well as the method of testing (eg, maternal history, urine testing, meconium testing, a combination of these tests).

In 1998, Lester reported that the Maternal Lifestyles Study (MLS), a multicenter clinical study, evaluated the effects of fetal exposure to opiates, cocaine, or both in the United States.[3] The overall exposure rate was 10%. Of these pregnancies, the rate of perinatal morbidity was higher than the nonexposed group but was less than 5% overall. Prematurity, lower growth parameters, compromised cognitive ability, and neurological symptoms were barely significant compared with nonexposed newborns.

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) reported that, from 1996-1998, 14.8% of pregnant women consumed alcohol.[4] During that same period, 2.8% of the surveyed women were reported to have used an illicit substance. Of those using illicit substances, two thirds were using marijuana, and one tenth were using cocaine.

Studies showed an increase in the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome between 2000 and 2009, from 1.20 cases to 3.39 cases per 1000 hospital births per year. As well, the cost of treating an infant with neonatal abstinence syndrome increased from an estimated average of $39,400 in 2000 to $53,400 in 2009.[5]

In a 2018 retrospective study (1999-2014), the national prevalence of opioid abuse in the United States increased by 333%, from 1.5 cases per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations to 6.5 per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations, an average annual increase of 0.4 per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations per year.[6]

In 2020, between 8-11% of pregnant women aged 15 to 44 used illicit drugs, tobacco products, or alcohol in the past month. Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug among pregnant women.[7]  Nearly 1 in 12 newborns in the United States in 2020 experienced prenatal exposure to alcohol, opioids, marijuana, or cocaine.[8]

International data

Perinatal drug abuse and neonatal drug withdrawal is probably a recognized problem in neonatal and postnatal care in every country in the world.

O’Donnell and colleagues measured the birth prevalence of neonatal withdrawal syndrome over time, associated maternal characteristics, and child protection involvement.[9] This retrospective cohort study used linked health and child protection databases for all live births in Western Australia from 1980 to 2005. Maternal characteristics and mental health-related and assault-related medical history were assessed using logistic regression models. The study showed the birth prevalence of neonatal withdrawal syndrome increased from 0.97 cases per 10,000 live births to a high of 42.2 per 10,000 live births, plateauing after 2002. 

Race-related demographics

The difficulty in assessing drug use confounds research into racial differences. Overall, cocaine use is higher among black women (5% of all black women) than white women (2% of all white women). Prevalence rates are lower among Asian and Pacific Islander women. The use of amphetamines, opioids, and cannabinoids appears to be equal between black and white women.

Sex-related demographics

By definition, perinatal drug abuse is a disease exclusively of pregnant women; however, several interesting epidemiological patterns emerge among mothers who abuse substances. These patterns include the following:

Age-related demographics

Little data on the age stratification of substance abusing mothers are available. Research has focused on the adolescent mother. In particular, a link between adolescent pregnancy and substance use may be present.

If teenage pregnancy is believed to be a high-risk condition, then those individuals may be prone to other high-risk behaviors. Evidence does support a clustering of teen pregnancy with substance abuse, most notably abuse of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. However, the statement that most pregnant and parenting teenagers abuse substances is a gross oversimplification. The literature supports that most pregnant teenagers do not use substances. Among those teenagers who do use substances, the amount used is far lower than the amount used by adult users who are pregnant.

Prognosis

Prognosis

Growth deficiency

Children with prenatal nicotine exposure exhibit appropriate catch-up growth but are known to have smaller lungs and, possibly, decreased ventilatory drive in response to carbon dioxide.

Children with prenatal amphetamine and cocaine exposure exhibit catch-up growth within 2 years of life.

Children with prenatal opiate exposure typically do not exhibit changes in growth parameters.

Infants exposed to buprenorphine have not exhibited significant differences in growth parameters compared to infants who have not been exposed.

Cognitive and developmental defects

Infants exposed to nicotine tend to score higher on auditory habituation but lower on the orientation cluster of the Brazelton Newborn Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS).

Infants exposed to alcohol may develop intellectual disability, which is one of the hallmarks of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). An apparent dose-dependent relationship is present, and FAS now accounts for approximately 33% of all intellectual disability. Milder cognitive effects include prolonged language delays and sleep dysfunction. Newborns exposed to alcohol also tend to be hypotonic.

Infants exposed to cocaine may exhibit fetal brain malformation resulting from changes in the homeostatic neurochemistry. Serious debate surrounds the actual deleterious effects of in utero cocaine exposure. Consequences previously described include altered behavior on NBAS scores (eg, poor state regulation, decreases in alertness and orientation, abnormal reflexes, tone and motor maturity), increased tone (described as hypertonic tetraparesis), electroencephalogram (EEG) changes, abnormal auditory brainstem responses,[13] and prolonged behavioral and language delays. However, data are inconsistent to prove that cocaine is solely responsible for these problems. Prenatal cocaine exposure can negatively affect the overall quality of maternal-child interaction during early childhood.[14] Research on this topic has been difficult, as confounding variables (eg, postnatal psychosocial issues, polydrug use in pregnancy) are difficult to control.

Prior conventional wisdom dictated that neurological morbidity was associated with cumulative postnatal risks preventing proper development. Prospective studies have shown no direct effect of cocaine exposure on development at age 3 years after correcting for race, parity, and socioeconomic status. However, data have also shown that infants exposed to cocaine may require more educational services than infants who are not exposed.[15, 16] The effect was magnified if the infants also had low birth weight or if they had low intelligence quotient (IQ).

A follow-up to the Maternal Lifestyle Study has shown that high exposure to cocaine, particularly with other drugs, is associated with behavioral issues in adolescence. However, protective factors such as beneficial bonding, community and family support, as well as stable home structure can attenuate the intensity of these behavioral issues.[17]

Infants exposed to opioids may have increased overall activity on NBAS testing. They tend to have difficulty being consoled. These infants also have been shown to have an early learning difficulty.[16]

Infants exposed in utero to methadone have been shown to have altered visual-evoked potentials, inferring a need for earlier visual assessments.[18]

Treatment length

Although length of treatment cannot always be correlated as a dose-dependent relationship with maternal use, data have suggested that, in mothers using high doses of methadone, for every daily dosage increase of 5.5 mg, an extra day in length of treatment time was added. Gestational age was not seen as significant.[19] However, data have also shown that infants born to mothers using methadone had increased length of treatment when concomitant benzodiazepine use or increased gestational age were associated. These findings were noted even when controlling for maternal methadone dose, concomitant use of tobacco or antidepressants, and trimester timing of initial dose.[20]

Several studies have compared the withdrawal effects of buprenorphine exposure with that of methadone exposure. In most cases, buprenorphine exposure was associated with decreased overall neonatal withdrawal treatment time and lower neonatal length of stay. Data on whether infants exposed to buprenorphine were more likely to require withdrawal treatment compared with infants exposed to methadone are conflicting.[21, 22, 23]

Morbidity/mortality

Neonatal withdrawal syndrome occurs in 60% of all fetuses exposed to drugs. Withdrawal syndromes for heroin, codeine, methadone, and meperidine have been extensively described. As more psychotropic medications are prescribed, more withdrawal syndromes are described. Heroin, cocaine, and amphetamine withdrawal usually occurs within the first 48 hours of life; however, a syndrome associated with intrauterine cocaine use has not been well defined. Methadone withdrawal can occur up to 2 weeks after birth but most likely occurs within the first 96 hours after birth. The syndrome is typically an autonomic multisystemic reaction, the symptoms of which are mostly neurological and may be prolonged.

Alcohol is the only drug of abuse that is well associated with other teratogenic effects. The classic triad of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) consists of growth retardation, physical anomalies (with characteristic facies), and CNS dysfunction. The risk of delivering a child with FAS increases with gravidity in mothers with alcoholism. Milder forms of FAS have also been described, representing a dose-dependent version of the entire syndrome. More severe aspects are associated with first trimester use of alcohol, especially in those women with a poor diet. At this time, a safe level of alcohol use during pregnancy is not known; therefore, the amount of alcohol that can be consumed without resulting in any part of the FAS spectrum is unknown.

Poor feeding is a common issue with withdrawing infants. Increasing evidence suggests that neurological alterations occur during withdrawal that prevent normal autonomic functions. Newborns, in particular, depend on their reflexive suck and swallow abilities, which may be significantly affected by intrauterine drug exposure.[24] As such, poor feeding alone can start a cascade of other diagnoses.

Complications

Perinatal complications include the following:

Prematurity is accompanied by a host of medical complications including asphyxia, neonatorum, intracranial hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, septicemia, and hyperbilirubinemia.

Although gross generalizations, the following growth characteristics may occur as a result of exposure to drugs:

Patient Education

Government programs are available to help the prevention of perinatal drug use. Many have published documents that address support for pregnant women who abuse substances, addiction prevention, and treatment programs and guidelines for clinicians managing patients who abuse substances. These publications are available to primary care physicians and obstetricians and can be obtained free of charge from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA).

The following Internet sites provide guidelines for providers:

History

Pregnancy actually offers an excellent opportunity for a mother to seek help and to change her life to protect another. However, given the large numbers of mothers who abuse drugs and whose use goes undetected by their obstetricians and pediatricians, the history-taking practice in prenatal settings must change if this part of the medical evaluation is to be useful.

Previous attempts at universal toxicology screens for women who are pregnant typically have uncovered one half of all women who abuse drugs. Urine toxicology in combination with a well-performed history is likely to have synergistic results in discovering mothers who abuse substances.

All too often, the wish to perform an efficient prenatal screening consists solely of asking whether the woman who is pregnant uses drugs. Such questioning carries such stigma and lack of empathy that it is likely to prevent a mother-to-be from admitting her habit of substance abuse. Questioning should be nonjudgmental (ie, ask in a neutral tone of voice), specific (ie, ask about each potential drug of abuse starting with the least innocuous to the most), and asked in succession with the other standard screening inquiries (eg, general medical condition, diet).

Although several perinatal complications have been thought to be highly associated with in utero drug use, none are pathognomonic. Multiple studies have reported an association of maternal cocaine and tobacco use and placental abruption.

Methadone is perhaps the most commonly seen medication in the withdrawing infant. Clinicians can be somewhat prepared to care for these infants because such information is made available during the prenatal visit. In assessing the history of the maternal methadone dose, one must consider a great deal of conflicting data concerning the predictability of withdrawal severity with maternal methadone concentrations. Whether the relationship between maternal methadone dose and severity of neonatal withdrawal is linear remains a subject of debate.[27, 28, 29, 30, 31] One study noted that infants who were conceived while the mother was on methadone had better drug treatment outcomes for withdrawal compared with infants who were only exposed in the third trimester.[32] Withdrawal severity was similar for both groups.

Buprenorphine has become a rapidly popular withdrawal treatment medication for pregnant women.[33, 34, 23, 22] As a partial opiate agonist, it has a ceiling effect in pleasurable effects and has shown increased compliance while also demonstrating lower transference through the placenta compared with methadone due to its greater molecular weight. As well, when compared with methadone use in utero to treat opioid dependence in the mother, buprenorphine use resulted in fewer infants requiring withdrawal treatment. In addition, of infants who did require treatment, those exposed to buprenorphine spent fewer days in the hospital compared with those exposed to methadone.[35]

Physical Examination

The severity of newborn withdrawal from substances depends on the drugs and the frequency of use by the mother during pregnancy. Note the following:

Laboratory Studies

Generally, perinatal information is enough to provide clues about the mother and her history of drug abuse, as well as urine toxicology screening at the time of admission to the hospital for delivery. Based on the information obtained, clinicians also need to examine the infant and see if further investigation is clinically warranted in addition to sending urine and meconium or umbilical cord samples for toxicology screening.

Typically, a sepsis work-up is not routinely performed solely because of drug exposure; however, a thorough review of the perinatal history and examination of the newborn is warranted.

The following studies are indicated when assessing perinatal drug abuse and neonatal drug withdrawal:

Toxicology screening

A maternal urine toxicological screen may be helpful in determining drug use. A urine screen only signifies recent use or heavy use of drugs. In general, the length of time that a drug is present in urine after use is as follows:

Neonatal toxicology screening should also include algorithms using meconium testing.[42] Meconium testing provides higher sensitivity than urine testing and is comparable to umbilical cord tissue samples.

Other Tests

In 1986, Finnegan et al created the Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System, which provides an objective measure of a newborn's symptom severity (see image below).[43]



View Image

Perinatal Drug Abuse and Neonatal Drug Withdrawal. Neonatal abstinence scoring form.

This system is currently used as a diagnostic tool and as a monitor for the response of a newborn with withdrawal to pharmacotherapy.

Each of the 21 different symptoms is scored depending on severity. All scores are then added. Scoring is performed in 4-hour intervals. If the newborn receives a score of 8 or greater, then scoring should occur every 2 hours. If the scores in the first 96 hours of life are consistently 8 or less, then scoring can be discontinued and pharmacotherapy is typically not needed.

If the maternal urine screen or history is positive for drug use, first assess the infant at 2 hours after birth. Scores should reflect the symptoms observed during the entire interval, not just at a single point. Scores involving sleep and behavior should reflect any changes during the test period. For instance, if the child was awakened for the examination, do not score against the child for diminished sleep.

A higher total score implies a more severe withdrawal syndrome. Likewise, as the child responds to treatment, use the scores to titrate the amount of pharmacotherapy needed.

Although the scoring system is primarily designed for withdrawal from opiates or CNS depressant drugs, it has been used for other drugs (eg, cocaine, amphetamines). Its efficacy in these situations is likely from a preponderance of polypharmacy use.

Imaging Studies

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

In a study that evaluated the brains of 118 newborns born to 118 mothers with marijuana, cocaine, and/or methadone maintenance and/or heroin use, there appeared to be anatomic abnormalities at similar sites among the three groups, including smaller volumes in the dorsal, medial, and ventral surfaces of the frontal lobe, as well as dose-related increases in volumes in the lateral temporal lobe, dorsal parietal lobe, and superior frontal gyrus.[44] Also similar among the drug exposures were dose-related increases in diffusion tensor measures of tissue organization, decreases in T2 relaxometry times, and increases in spectroscopy metabolite concentrations. The investigators indicated the findings suggest an association between prenatal drug exposure and measures of newborn brain tissue in patterns that may indicate such exposures accelerate normal fetal brain maturation as well as mediate associations of these drug exposure with poorer 12-month infant outcomes.[44]

Medical Care

Perhaps the most important aspect of medical care for the potentially withdrawing infant should be that all nurseries caring for such infants develop a care protocol addressing screening and treatment. Such plans minimize care variance and have the potential to prevent unnecessary withdrawal from occurring.[1]

Administer paregoric and phenobarbital for withdrawal of opiates and barbiturates, respectively (see Medication). 

Naloxone should not be administered to any infant born to a mother who is known to be using narcotics (eg, opium, heroin, methadone, hydrocodone) because it may cause sudden symptoms of withdrawal, including seizures.

Treatment and medication primarily focus on opiate and cocaine withdrawal. Although understanding polydrug interactions is difficult, no specific treatment plan for amphetamine, marijuana, tobacco, or alcohol withdrawal is recognized (unless teratogenic effects are observed).

Controversy still remains over the proper choice of pharmacologic treatment. The mainstays of treatment include opioids (especially if specific prenatal opioid use was known) and phenobarbital. In meta-analyses, opioid therapy alone versus phenobarbital therapy alone showed no difference in treatment failure. However, those treated with opioid therapy alone had shorter lengths of stay in the hospital.

One study showed that combined use of opioid therapy and phenobarbital may reduce the overall length of hospital stay and durations of symptoms.[45]

As maternal buprenorphine use increases, the rationale for its use as a treatment for neonatal withdrawal becomes more evident. One study used buprenorphine sublingually (13.2 μg/kg/d, divided 3 times) in withdrawing neonates. A 30% reduction in treatment time and length of stay was noted compared with standard opiate treatment.[34]

Studies have also investigated the use of clonidine with or without opiate treatment for neonatal abstinence may be a worthy alternative.[28, 46, 47]

Until the child has been weaned off medication, or until the symptoms have abated (as confirmed by the Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System), the patient should be constantly monitored by newborn nursery staff. Vital signs should be checked, the Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System score should be obtained, seizure precautions should be taken, and frequent weight checks should be performed.

All medically treated newborns should constantly be monitored for cardiovascular, respiratory, and oxygen saturation changes.

In newborns with severe symptoms, intravenous fluids with electrolytes may be needed. Oral feedings may need to be withheld.

Consultations

The following consultations may be indicated:

Diet

Breastfeeding

Many infants in this situation have difficulty establishing breastfeeding or bottle-feeding.

Although no consensus has been reached, a meta-analysis has demonstrated that, even when controlled for methadone or polydrug use, infants of drug-using women who were breastfed showed an overall lower need for abstinence treatment.[48]

Controversy has emerged regarding breastfeeding and maternal methadone use, particularly with the large dose increases seen in the last decade. In an American Academy of Pediatrics statement from 2001, breastfeeding has been encouraged, regardless of dosage. The impetus of this decision is based mostly on the minimal transfer of methadone through breast milk. Evidence has shown that regardless of maternal dose, methadone concentrations in breast milk were minimal, and neurobehavioral effects on the newborn were generally not seen.[49]

In addition, women who are adhering to buprenorphine maintenance treatment should be encouraged to breastfeed, as the amount of this medication being excreted in human milk is small.[50]

Withhold breastfeeding if other substances are suspected or if the mother is HIV positive.

Increased caloric intake

The newborn withdrawing from drugs has higher caloric demands. In addition to the catabolism resulting from withdrawal symptoms, these patients lose calories from vomiting, drooling, and diarrhea.

Consider provision of hypercaloric (100.42 J/oz) formula in frequent small feedings. The daily caloric goal should be 627.6-1046 J/kg/d.

Activity

The child's comfort is paramount. Being a newborn is extremely stressful in the first few weeks of life because every external stimulus is entirely new to the infant. Add the stress of the internal stimuli from drug withdrawal, and the usefulness of environmental control can be understood. With this in mind, consider that 40% of all withdrawing newborns can be treated symptomatically (without medication). Specific methods include the following:

Long-Term Monitoring

The following is indicated as part of further outpatient care in perinatal drug abuse and neonatal drug withdrawal:

Medication Summary

Opiate substitutes and phenobarbital are the mainstays of treatment. Other sedatives such as diazepam have not been shown to be effective. Many studies have compared opiates with phenobarbital alone. In general, opiates have been most effective. However, considerable data have shown that a combination treatment of opiates and phenobarbital significantly decreases hospital stay and decreases withdrawal severity. The drawback is that total duration of treatment (mostly as an outpatient on phenobarbital) is increased.

Opium tincture

Clinical Context:  Use a 1:25 dilution. When ordering such a medication, be sure to emphasize that a dilute solution of the deodorized tincture is needed in a 1:25 ratio. Without this emphasis, the pharmacy may deliver undiluted DTO (used for adults) or the camphorated tincture of opium (Paregoric), which contains 45% alcohol, camphor, anise oil, and benzoic acid.

Morphine

Clinical Context:  Increasing data shows that, although this is similar in effect to DTO, it may be a safer alternative because the morphine elixir avoids the effects of alcohol extracts in DTO. Morphine elixir may allow for better weight gain compared with DTO, as well.

Class Summary

These are the treatment of choice for neonates known to be at risk of withdrawal from opiates. Morphine elixir is gaining more support over deodorized tincture of opium as the treatment of choice for a primarily opioid withdrawal syndrome.

Phenobarbital (Luminal)

Clinical Context:  Interferes with transmission of impulses from thalamus to cortex of brain. Used as a sedative. As above, this is perhaps best used in combination with an opiate analog in reducing withdrawal severity.

Class Summary

Although barbiturates also are available for neonatal withdrawal syndrome, their optimal use is limited to several clinical situations, including the following:

1. The newborn with a nonopiate withdrawal

2. The newborn with a known polydrug withdrawal

3. The newborn with abstinence-related seizures

4. The newborn who has already received the maximum safe level of deodorized tincture of opium (DTO)

Author

Marvin Wang, MD, Clinical Instructor, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School; Co-director of Newborn Nurseries, Attending Physician, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital,

Disclosure: Received research grant from: New England Pediatric Device Consortium.

Specialty Editors

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Brian S Carter, MD, FAAP, Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Neonatology, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics; Faculty, Children's Mercy Bioethics Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dharmendra J Nimavat, MD, FAAP, Associate Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine; Staff Neonatologist, Clinical Director, NICU Regional Perinatal Center, HSHS St John's Children's Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Ted Rosenkrantz, MD, Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynecology, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. [Guideline] Hudak ML, Tan RC, for the Committee on Drugs and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal drug withdrawal [reaffirmed May 2016]. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb. 129(2):e540-60. [View Abstract]
  2. Ko JY, Coy KC, Haight SC, et al. Characteristics of marijuana use during pregnancy - eight states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 14. 69(32):1058-63. [View Abstract]
  3. Lester BM. The Maternal Lifestyles Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 21. 846:296-305. [View Abstract]
  4. Ebrahim SH, Gfroerer J. Pregnancy-related substance use in the United States during 1996-1998. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb. 101(2):374-9. [View Abstract]
  5. Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. JAMA. 2012 May 9. 307(18):1934-40. [View Abstract]
  6. Haight SC, Ko JY, Tong VT, Bohm MK, Callaghan WM. Opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization - United States, 1999-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 10. 67(31):845-9. [View Abstract]
  7. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Women. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. July, 2022. Available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/slides-2020-nsduh/2020NSDUHWomenSlides072522.pdf. Accessed: March 11, 2024.
  8. Umer A. 1 in 12 infants are exposed to drugs prenatally. Clinical Advisor: Pediatrics. March 5, 2024. Available at https://www.clinicaladvisor.com/home/topics/pediatrics-information-center/1-in-12-infants-exposed-drugs-prenatally/. Accessed: March 5, 2024.
  9. O'Donnell M, Nassar N, Leonard H, et al. Increasing prevalence of neonatal withdrawal syndrome: population study of maternal factors and child protection involvement. Pediatrics. 2009 Apr. 123(4):e614-21. [View Abstract]
  10. Wilsnack SC. Drinking, sexuality, and sexual dysfunction in women. In: Wilsnack SC, Beckman LJ, eds. Alcohol Problems in Women: Antecedents, Consequences, and Intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1984. 189-228.
  11. Hien D, Scheier J. Trauma and short-term outcome for women in detoxification. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996 May-Jun. 13(3):227-31. [View Abstract]
  12. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA. 1990 Nov 21. 264(19):2511-8. [View Abstract]
  13. Tan-Laxa MA, Sison-Switala C, Rintelman W, Ostrea EM Jr. Abnormal auditory brainstem response among infants with prenatal cocaine exposure. Pediatrics. 2004 Feb. 113(2):357-60. [View Abstract]
  14. Mansoor E, Morrow CE, Accornero VH, et al. Longitudinal effects of prenatal cocaine use on mother-child interactions at ages 3 and 5 years. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Jan. 33(1):32-41. [View Abstract]
  15. Levine TP, Liu J, Das A, et al. Effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on special education in school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2008 Jul. 122(1):e83-91. [View Abstract]
  16. Conradt E, Sheinkopf SJ, Lester BM, et al, for the Maternal Lifestyle Study. Prenatal substance exposure: neurobiologic organization at 1 month. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct. 163(4):989-94.e1. [View Abstract]
  17. Bada HS, Bann CM, Whitaker TM, et al. Protective factors can mitigate behavior problems after prenatal cocaine and other drug exposures. Pediatrics. 2012 Dec. 130(6):e1479-88. [View Abstract]
  18. McGlone L, Hamilton R, McCulloch DL, et al. Neonatal visual evoked potentials in infants born to mothers prescribed methadone. Pediatrics. 2013 Mar. 131(3):e857-63. [View Abstract]
  19. Lim S, Prasad MR, Samuels P, Gardner DK, Cordero L. High-dose methadone in pregnant women and its effect on duration of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan. 200(1):70.e1-5. [View Abstract]
  20. Seligman NS, Salva N, Hayes EJ, Dysart KC, Pequignot EC, Baxter JK. Predicting length of treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone-exposed neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct. 199(4):396.e1-7. [View Abstract]
  21. Ebner N, Rohrmeister K, Winklbaur B, et al. Management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in neonates born to opioid maintained women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Mar 16. 87(2-3):131-8. [View Abstract]
  22. Jones HE, Johnson RE, Jasinski DR, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Jul. 79(1):1-10. [View Abstract]
  23. Farid WO, Dunlop SA, Tait RJ, Hulse GK. The effects of maternally administered methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone on offspring: review of human and animal data. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2008 Jun. 6(2):125-50. [View Abstract]
  24. Gewolb IH, Fishman D, Qureshi MA, Vice FL. Coordination of suck-swallow-respiration in infants born to mothers with drug-abuseproblems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004 Oct. 46(10):700-5. [View Abstract]
  25. Wouldes TA, Woodward LJ. Maternal methadone dose during pregnancy and infant clinical outcome. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010 May-Jun. 32(3):406-13. [View Abstract]
  26. Cleary BJ, Donnelly JM, Strawbridge JD, et al. Methadone and perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb. 204(2):139.e1-9. [View Abstract]
  27. Berghella V, Lim PJ, Hill MK, et al. Maternal methadone dose and neonatal withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug. 189(2):312-7. [View Abstract]
  28. Esmaeili A, Keinhorst AK, Schuster T, Beske F, Schlosser R, Bastanier C. Treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome with clonidine and chloral hydrate. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Feb. 99(2):209-14. [View Abstract]
  29. Dryden C, Young D, Hepburn M, Mactier H. Maternal methadone use in pregnancy: factors associated with the development of neonatal abstinence syndrome and implications for healthcare resources. BJOG. 2009 Apr. 116(5):665-71. [View Abstract]
  30. Lim S, Prasad MR, Samuels P, Gardner DK, Cordero L. High-dose methadone in pregnant women and its effect on duration of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan. 200(1):70.e1-5. [View Abstract]
  31. McCarthy JJ, Leamon MH, Parr MS, Anania B. High-dose methadone maintenance in pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep. 193(3 Pt 1):606-10. [View Abstract]
  32. McCarthy JJ, Leamon MH, Stenson G, Biles LA. Outcomes of neonates conceived on methadone maintenance therapy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Sep. 35(2):202-6. [View Abstract]
  33. Kacinko SL, Jones HE, Johnson RE, Choo RE, Huestis MA. Correlations of maternal buprenorphine dose, buprenorphine, and metabolite concentrations in meconium with neonatal outcomes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Nov. 84(5):604-12. [View Abstract]
  34. Kraft WK, Gibson E, Dysart K, et al. Sublingual buprenorphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2008 Sep. 122(3):e601-7. [View Abstract]
  35. Jones HE, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9. 363(24):2320-31. [View Abstract]
  36. Stroud LR, Paster RL, Papandonatos GD, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and newborn neurobehavior: effects at 10 to 27 days. J Pediatr. 2009 Jan. 154(1):10-6. [View Abstract]
  37. National Toxicology Program. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of amphetamines. NTP CERHR MON. 2005 Jul. (16):vii-III1. [View Abstract]
  38. Smith LM, LaGasse LL, Derauf C, et al. The infant development, environment, and lifestyle study: effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure, polydrug exposure, and poverty on intrauterine growth. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep. 118(3):1149-56. [View Abstract]
  39. Sanz EJ, De-las-Cuevas C, Kiuru A, Bate A, Edwards R. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnant women and neonatal withdrawal syndrome: a database analysis. Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11. 365(9458):482-7. [View Abstract]
  40. Montgomery D, Plate C, Alder SC, Jones M, Jones J, Christensen RD. Testing for fetal exposure to illicit drugs using umbilical cord tissue vs meconium. J Perinatol. 2006 Jan 1. 26(1):11-4. [View Abstract]
  41. Vinner E, Vignau J, Thibault D, et al. Neonatal hair analysis contribution to establishing a gestational drug exposure profile and predicting a withdrawal syndrome. Ther Drug Monit. 2003 Aug. 25(4):421-32. [View Abstract]
  42. Ryan RM, Wagner CL, Schultz JM, et al. Meconium analysis for improved identification of infants exposed to cocaine in utero. J Pediatr. 1994 Sep. 125(3):435-40. [View Abstract]
  43. Finnegan LP. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and pharmacotherapy. In: Rubaltelli FF, Granati B, eds. Neonatal Therapy: An Update. New York: Excerpta Medica; 1986. 122-46.
  44. Peterson BS, Rosen T, Dingman S, et al. Associations of maternal prenatal drug abuse with measures of newborn brain structure, tissue organization, and metabolite concentrations. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Sep 1. 174(9):831-42. [View Abstract]
  45. Coyle MG, Ferguson A, Lagasse L, Oh W, Lester B. Diluted tincture of opium (DTO) and phenobarbital versus DTO alone for neonatal opiate withdrawal in term infants. J Pediatr. 2002 May. 140(5):561-4. [View Abstract]
  46. Leikin JB, Mackendrick WP, Maloney GE, et al. Use of clonidine in the prevention and management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Jul. 47(6):551-5. [View Abstract]
  47. Agthe AG, Kim GR, Mathias KB, et al. Clonidine as an adjunct therapy to opioids for neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2009 May. 123(5):e849-56. [View Abstract]
  48. Abdel-Latif ME, Pinner J, Clews S, Cooke F, Lui K, Oei J. Effects of breast milk on the severity and outcome of neonatal abstinence syndrome among infants of drug-dependent mothers. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun. 117(6):e1163-9. [View Abstract]
  49. Jansson LM, Choo R, Velez ML, et al. Methadone maintenance and breastfeeding in the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 2008 Jan. 121(1):106-14. [View Abstract]
  50. Jansson LM. ABM clinical protocol #21: Guidelines for breastfeeding and the drug-dependent woman. Breastfeed Med. 2009 Dec. 4(4):225-8. [View Abstract]
  51. Sawyer C, Sanghavi R, Ortigoza EB. Neonatal gastroesophageal reflux. Early Hum Dev. 2022 Aug. 171:105600. [View Abstract]
  52. [Guideline] Jansson LM, Bunik M, Chantry CJ, et al, for the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. Neonatal drug withdrawal. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs [published erratum appears in Pediatrics 1998 Sep;102(3 Pt 1):660]. Pediatrics. 1998 Jun. 101(6):1079-88. [View Abstract]
  53. Galvin SL, Ramage M, Mazure E, Coulson CC. The association of cannabis use late in pregnancy with engagement and retention in perinatal substance use disorder care for opioid use disorder: A cohort comparison. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Oct. 117:108098. [View Abstract]

Perinatal Drug Abuse and Neonatal Drug Withdrawal. Neonatal abstinence scoring form.

Perinatal Drug Abuse and Neonatal Drug Withdrawal. Neonatal abstinence scoring form.