Ecthyma Gangrenosum

Back

Background

Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is a well-recognized but uncommon cutaneous infection classically associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.[1]  EG usually occurs in patients who are critically ill and immunocompromised; it is almost always a sign of pseudomonal sepsis. Rarely, other bacteria, including Proteus species, Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, have been implicated in similar lesions.[2, 3, 4]  The characteristic lesions of EG are hemorrhagic vesicles or pustules that evolve into necrotic ulcers with a tender erythematous border. EG was first described in association with Pseudomonas septicemia by Barker in 1897 and was later given the name "ecthyma gangrenosum" by Hitschmann and Kreibich. Not all cases have been associated with sepsis.[5]  See the image below.



View Image

Violaceous plaques and necrotic ulcers on the abdomen of a renal transplant patient. Tissue cultures were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Related Medscape articles include Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections and Pseudomonas Infection.

Pathophysiology

Impaired humoral or cellular immunity leads to increased susceptibility to infections with P aeruginosa or other pathogens. In addition, breakdown of mechanical defensive barriers, such as the skin and mucosa, may allow infectious organisms to disseminate. The lesions of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) result from perivascular bacterial invasion of arteries and veins in the dermis and subcutaneous tissues, producing a necrotizing vasculitis.[6] Perivascular involvement can occur by hematogenous seeding of the skin in bacteremic patients or by direct inoculation through the skin in non-bacteremic patients. Extravasation of blood, edema, and necrosis around the vessel interrupt the blood supply to these tissues, resulting in secondary ischemic necrosis of the epidermis and dermis, which manifests as nodular lesions that rapidly evolve through stages of central hemorrhage, ulceration, and necrosis.

Etiology

Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is typically and most commonly caused by P aeruginosa; however, EG-like lesions have been observed in patients with other bacterial and fungal infections.[7] Organisms that cause ecthyma and EG-like lesions include the following:

Gram-positive bacteria are as follows:

Gram-negative bacteria are as follows:

Fungi are as follows:

Viral causes include herpes simplex virus.[14]

Epidemiology

Frequency

Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) develops in 1.3-13% patients with P aeruginosa sepsis and, to a lesser extent, in patients who are not bacteremic.

Sex

No sexual predilection is evident in the overall prevalence of EG; however, a slight predominance of bacteremic EG in males (male-to-female ratio, 1.3-5:1) and nonbacteremic EG in females (female-to-male ratio, 2.3:1) has been observed.

Age

EG may affect patients of any age, although it is commonly reported in infants and elderly patients due to underdeveloped and/or compromised immune systems, including chronic granulomatous disease.[15]

Prognosis

A high mortality rate is reported with delayed diagnosis and therapy. Mortality rates of Pseudomonas sepsis in immunocompromised persons range from 18-96%, whereas the mortality rate of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) in nonbacteremic patients is 15.4%. Coexisting conditions in patients prone to Pseudomonas sepsis may contribute to the morbidity and mortality rates.

Factors associated with a poor prognosis include the following:

History

Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) typically occurs in patients who are immunocompromised, including patients with hematologic malignancies, immunodeficiency syndromes, severe burns, malnutrition, recent chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy, and diabetes mellitus. While a few case reports describe the development of EG in previously healthy children, most of these patients had unrecognized risk factors for the development of EG, including intra-abdominal or appendiceal abscesses, recent viral illness such as influenza B leading to a transient severe neutropenia,[16] or antibiotic treatment for underlying medical conditions such as hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia.

Two reports describe toxic epidermal necrolysis followed by EG, one in a 62-year-old woman and the other in a 3-year-old boy.[17, 18]

Breakdown of mechanical defense barriers increases susceptibility to pseudomonal or fungal infections. Pseudomonas sepsis frequently occurs after surgical procedures, especially urologic procedures. Long-term indwelling urinary catheters, long-term intravenous placements, and tracheostomies have been associated with EG.

In several reported cases, patients with EG were on prolonged antibiotic therapy targeting non-Pseudomonas organisms. This may have led to elimination of normal flora and promoted Pseudomonas overgrowth.

Children with EG may develop diarrhea (30%) before the onset of cutaneous lesions.

Patients often present with fever a few days prior to developing EG.

Physical Examination

Primary lesions

Primary cutaneous lesions of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) initially appear as painless round erythematous macules that rapidly become pustular with surrounding erythema. A hemorrhagic focus appears in the center, forming a bulla. As the hemorrhagic bulla spreads peripherally, it evolves into a gangrenous ulcer with a central black/gray eschar surrounded by an erythematous halo. The transformation of an early lesion to a necrotic ulcer may occur in as little as 12 hours.

Distribution of lesions

The patient may have a single lesion or multiple lesions. EG may appear at any location on the body; however, it predominately affects the anogenital and axillary areas. Distribution occurs at the following frequencies: gluteal or perineal region (57%), extremities (30%), trunk (6%), and face (6%); bilateral periorbital manifestations are rare but have been reported.[19, 20]

Laboratory Studies

See the list below:

Imaging Studies

In a confirmed diagnosis of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) of the plantar foot, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed edema of the skin, subcutaneous fat, deep and superficial fascia, and plantar muscles. The postcontrast fat-suppressed images showed a geographic pattern of absent enhancement, which was consistent with muscle ischemia and/or necrosis. Deep fascial enhancement was absent; this is in contrast to necrotizing fasciitis, which on MRI demonstrates fascial enhancement after contrast administration.[21]

Histologic Findings

Skin biopsy specimens of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) lesions show a necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with few inflammatory cells but many surrounding bacilli. In sections stained with Gram stain, gram-negative rods are numerous in the media and adventitia of the necrotic vessels, but typically spare the intima.[22] Extravasation of blood, edema, and necrosis are seen around the involved vessels.

Medical Care

Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) requires prompt diagnosis and treatment with appropriately selected antibiotics for the underlying etiology. If the lesion fails to respond to antimicrobials, surgical debridement of the spreading, necrotic lesion may be required.[23, 24] The presence of EG should alert the physician to the likelihood of pseudomonal bacteremia, and the early implementation of antimicrobial agents is necessary to reduce the high mortality associated with pseudomonal sepsis.

Treatment of EG requires the use of antipseudomonal penicillins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, or aztreonam. While awaiting results, an antipseudomonal penicillin (piperacillin) should be used in conjunction with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin). Further adjustment of antibiotics may be required after sensitivity results are known. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may also be administered to patients with severe leukopenia and ecthyma gangrenosum to aid in recovery.[25]

Systemic antifungal coverage should be considered if fungemia is suspected, including coverage against Aspergillus, Candida, and Mucor species with azole agents (eg, voriconazole, fluconazole) and/or amphotericin B if appropriate.

If empiric antimicrobial and antifungal therapy is used, it must be comprehensive and should cover all likely pathogens in the context of the clinical setting. Antibiotic selection should be guided by blood culture sensitivity results whenever feasible.

Consultations

See the list below:

Medication Summary

Treatment of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) requires the use of antipseudomonal penicillins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, or aztreonam. Initially, antipseudomonal penicillin (piperacillin) is used in conjunction with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin). Further adjustment of antibiotics may be required after sensitivity results are known.

Piperacillin (Pipracil)

Clinical Context:  Piperacillin is a broad-spectrum penicillin. It inhibits the biosynthesis of cell wall mucopeptides and the stage of active multiplication. It has antipseudomonal activity.

Gentamicin (Gentacidin, Garamycin)

Clinical Context:  Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic for gram-negative coverage. It is used in combination with both an agent against gram-positive organisms and one that covers anaerobes. Gentamicin is not the drug of choice. Consider it if penicillins or other less toxic drugs are contraindicated, when clinically indicated, and in mixed infections caused by susceptible staphylococci and gram-negative organisms.

Dosing regimens are numerous; adjust the dose based on CrCl and changes in the volume of distribution. Gentamicin may be given IV/IM.

Ciprofloxacin (Cipro)

Clinical Context:  Ciprofloxacin inhibits bacterial DNA synthesis and, consequently, growth. It is a fluoroquinolone with activity against pseudomonads, streptococci, MRSA, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and most gram-negative organisms, but no activity against anaerobes. Continue treatment for at least 2 days (7-14 d typical) after signs and symptoms have disappeared.

Ceftazidime (Fortaz, Ceptaz)

Clinical Context:  Ceftazidime is a third-generation cephalosporin with broad-spectrum, gram-negative activity; it has lower efficacy against gram-positive organisms and higher efficacy against resistant organisms. Ceftazidime arrests bacterial growth by binding to one or more penicillin-binding proteins.

Class Summary

Empiric antimicrobial therapy must be comprehensive and should cover all likely pathogens in the context of the clinical setting. Antibiotic selection should be guided by blood culture sensitivity whenever feasible.

What is ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What is the pathophysiology of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What causes ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which gram-negative bacteria cause Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which fungi cause Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What is the prevalence of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What are the sexual predilections of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which age groups have the highest prevalence of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What is the prognosis of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What factors are associated with a poor prognosis in ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which clinical history findings are characteristic of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?How are the primary lesions of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) characterized?What are the differential diagnoses for Ecthyma Gangrenosum?What is the role of lab testing in the workup of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What is the role of imaging studies in the workup of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which histologic findings are characteristic of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?How is ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) treated?Which specialist consultations are beneficial to patients with ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?What is the role of medications in the treatment of ecthyma gangrenosum (EG)?Which medications in the drug class Antibiotics are used in the treatment of Ecthyma Gangrenosum?

Author

Mina Yassaee Kingsbery, MD, Co-Chief Resident, Department of Dermatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

William D James, MD, Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, Vice-Chairman, Residency Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Disclosure: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier; WebMD.

Specialty Editors

Richard P Vinson, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christen M Mowad, MD, Professor, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dirk M Elston, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH, Professor and Head of Dermatology, Professor of Pathology, Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Sarina Berger Elmariah, MD, PhD Resident Physician, Robert O Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine

Sarina Berger Elmariah, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Frederick Fish, MD Director, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, St Paul Ramsey Medical Center; Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota

Frederick Fish, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Dermatopathology, Pacific Dermatologic Association, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nobuyoshi Kageyama, MD Resident Physician, Assistant Clinical Professor of Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ravi Ubriani, MD Assistant Professor of Clinical Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Korte AKM, Vos JM. Ecthyma Gangrenosum. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7. 377 (23):e32. [View Abstract]
  2. Mouna K, Akkari H, Faten H, Yosra K, Hichem B, Maha M, et al. Ecthyma Gangrenosum Caused by Escherichia coli in a Previously Healthy Girl. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015 Jul-Aug. 32 (4):e179-80. [View Abstract]
  3. Miyake S, Nobeyama Y, Baba-Honda H, Nakagawa H. Case of ecthyma gangrenosum in which only methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was detected. J Dermatol. 2016 Apr. 43 (4):460-2. [View Abstract]
  4. Firoz M, Jamal A, Ur Rehman SI. Non-pseudomonal Ecthyma Gangrenosum and Idiopathic Myelofibrosis in a Two-Year-Old Girl. Cureus. 2018 Apr 6. 10 (4):e2441. [View Abstract]
  5. Ferguson L, Chong H, Singh M. Ecthyma gangrenosum without bacteraemia: evidence in favour of a broader definition. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017 Apr. 42 (3):324-327. [View Abstract]
  6. Yan W, Li W, Mu C, Wang L. Ecthyma gangrenosum and multiple nodules: cutaneous manifestations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in a previously healthy infant. Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Mar-Apr. 28(2):204-5. [View Abstract]
  7. Reich HL, Williams Fadeyi D, Naik NS, Honig PJ, Yan AC. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 May. 50(5 Suppl):S114-7. [View Abstract]
  8. Aygencel G, Dizbay M, Sahin G. Burkholderia cepacia as a Cause of Ecthyma Gangrenosum-like Lesion. Infection. 2008 Jun. 36(3):271-3. [View Abstract]
  9. Brown KL, Stein A, Morrell DS. Ecthyma gangrenosum and septic shock syndrome secondary to Chromobacterium violaceum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 May. 54(5 Suppl):S224-8. [View Abstract]
  10. Del Pozo J, García-Silva J, Almagro M, Martínez W, Nicolas R, Fonseca E. Ecthyma gangrenosum-like eruption associated with Morganella morganii infection. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Sep. 139(3):520-1. [View Abstract]
  11. Leslie KS, McCann BG, Levell NJ. Candidal ecthyma gangrenosum in a patient with malnutrition. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Oct. 153(4):847-8. [View Abstract]
  12. Bonduel M, Santos P, Turienzo CF, Chantada G, Paganini H. Atypical skin lesions caused by Curvularia sp. and Pseudallescheria boydii in two patients after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Jun. 27(12):1311-3. [View Abstract]
  13. Fergie JE, Huang DB, Purcell K, Milligan T. Successful treatment of Fusarium solani ecthyma gangrenosum in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Jun. 19(6):579-81. [View Abstract]
  14. Kimyai-Asadi A, Tausk FA, Nousari HC. Ecthyma secondary to herpes simplex virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Aug. 29(2):454-5. [View Abstract]
  15. Prindaville B, Nopper AJ, Lawrence H, Horii KA. Chronic granulomatous disease presenting with ecthyma gangrenosum in a neonate. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug. 71(2):e44-5. [View Abstract]
  16. Koo SH, Lee JH, Shin H, Lee JI. Ecthyma gangrenosum in a previously healthy infant. Arch Plast Surg. 2012 Nov. 39(6):673-5. [View Abstract]
  17. Downey DM, O'Bryan MC, Burdette SD, Michael JR, Saxe JM. Ecthyma gangrenosum in a patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Burn Care Res. 2007 Jan-Feb. 28(1):198-202. [View Abstract]
  18. Gresik CM, Brewster LP, Abood G, Supple KG, Silver GM, Gamelli RL, et al. Ecthyma gangrenosum following toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome in a 3-year-old boy-a survivable series of events. J Burn Care Res. 2008 May-Jun. 29(3):555-8. [View Abstract]
  19. Ghosheh FR, Kathuria SS. Bilateral periorbital ecthyma gangrenosum. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec. 22(6):492-3. [View Abstract]
  20. Inamadar AC, Palit A, Athanikar SB, Sampagavi VV, Deshmukh NS. Periocular ecthyma gangrenosum in a diabetic patient. Br J Dermatol. 2003 Apr. 148(4):821. [View Abstract]
  21. Kim JS, Ricafort R, Garfein ES, Levin TL. Imaging findings of ecthyma gangrenosum, an unusual complication of pseudomonas sepsis. HSS J. 2011 Oct. 7(3):279-81. [View Abstract]
  22. Halpern AV and WR Heymann. Bacterial Diseases. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, eds. Dermatology. 2nd ed. Spain: Elsevier Limited; 2008. Vol 1: Ch 73.
  23. Craigie RJ, Ahmed S, Mullassery D, Panarese A, Caswell M, Kenny SE. A spot that can kill. Lancet. 2007 May 5. 369(9572):1540. [View Abstract]
  24. Khalil BA, Baillie CT, Kenny SE, Lamont GL, Turnock RR, Pizer BL, et al. Surgical strategies in the management of ecthyma gangrenosum in paediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Jul. 24(7):793-797. [View Abstract]
  25. Gregorini M, Castello M, Rampino T, Bosio F, Bedino G, Esposito P, et al. GM-CSF contributes to prompt healing of ecthyma gangrenosum lesions in kidney transplant recipient. J Nephrol. 2012 Jan-Feb. 25(1):137-9. [View Abstract]

Violaceous plaques and necrotic ulcers on the abdomen of a renal transplant patient. Tissue cultures were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Violaceous plaques and necrotic ulcers on the abdomen of a renal transplant patient. Tissue cultures were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.