Elder Abuse



Over the past 35 years, tremendous strides have been made in identifying and increasing awareness about patterns of abusive relationships. Child abuse and intimate partner violence have received significantly more recognition than elder abuse and continue to receive more attention in both public and medical domains.

With current medical advances and the adoption of healthier lifestyles, people are living longer. Older Americans now comprise the fastest growing segment of the United States population. The 2010 US Census recorded 40.3 million people aged 65 years or older as comprising 13% of the population.[1] By the year 2020, this group will increase by 5.5%, and by 2050, older Americans are projected to account for 25% of the population.[2]

As a result of the number of older Americans, the number of elder abuse cases will increase, and the impact of elder abuse as a public health issue will grow.[3] Victims of violence have twice as many physician visits compared with the general US population, allowing opportunities for discovery and intervention. Due to the relative isolation of many elders who are mistreated, an unexpected visit to the emergency department may be the only opportunity for detection. Emergency physicians are in a unique position to identify, advocate for, and help manage this vulnerable population.

Elder mistreatment is a multidimensional phenomenon that encompasses a broad range of behaviors, events, and circumstances. Unlike random acts of violence or exploitation, elder abuse is often perpetrated by person(s) known to the victim, and usually consists of repetitive instances of misconduct. It encompasses any act of commission or omission that results in harm or threatened harm to the health and welfare of an older adult.

The US National Academy of Sciences defines elder abuse as follows:

From the legal system through the lay press to the medical literature, the terminology used to describe elder abuse is not consistent. Terms vary among researchers, and usage is not consistent in the laws of different states. Even the age at which a person is considered elderly, usually 60 or 65 years, is debated. Seven categories of elder abuse have been described by the National Center on Elder Abuse (NCEA).[4] Categories include the following:

Further training is needed for physicians regarding elder abuse.[6]



Due to the inconsistencies in the working definitions of elder abuse, differences in sampling and survey methods, and underreporting of cases, obtaining accurate information on the incidence of elder abuse and neglect is difficult.  A 2017 study based on the best available evidence from 52 studies in 28 countries from diverse regions, including 12 low- and middle-income countries, estimated that, over the past year, 15.7% of people aged 60 years and older were subjected to some form of abuse.[7]   Regarding elder abuse in institutions, a meta-analysis of 9 studies in 6 countries based on staff self-reports on perpetrating abuse found that 64.2% of staff perpetrated some form of abuse in the past year.[8]

Many factors play a role in the underestimation of the number of abused elders. Patient factors include fear, shame, guilt, or ignorance. Healthcare providers underestimate and underreport elder abuse due to decreased recognition of the problem, lack of awareness of reporting requirements, including who to report to, and concerns about physician-patient confidentiality.

In addition, many studies routinely exclude certain populations such as persons unable to respond to a survey, speakers of languages other than English, and persons with mental illness, further complicating accurate tallies of the number of older persons who are abused. Despite difficulty in identifying the exact frequency of elder abuse, the occurrence is common enough to be encountered regularly in daily clinical practice. As a result, healthcare providers must maintain a high index of suspicion.


Elders who are victim to physical abuse, caregiver neglect, or self-neglect have triple the mortality of those never reported as abused. Early detection and intervention by healthcare professionals in elder abuse cases may lead to decreased morbidity and mortality. Healthcare provider involvement is paramount, as studies have shown that only 1 in 6 victims are likely to self-report mistreatment to the appropriate legal authorities.


Elder abuse occurs among members of all racial, socioeconomic, and religious backgrounds. The NCEA found the following racial and ethnic distribution among older persons who had been abused:[9]


Women are believed to be the most common victims of abuse, perhaps because they report abuse at higher rates or because the severity of injury in women typically is greater than in men. Numerous studies, however, have found no differences based on sex.


By definition, elder abuse occurs in the elderly, although there is no universally accepted definition of when old age begins. Typically, 60 or 65 years is considered the threshold of old age.


The American Medical Association recommends that doctors routinely ask geriatric patients about abuse, even if signs are absent.[10] However, no randomized trials have been performed of elder abuse screening in asymptomatic populations to support this practice. Much remains to be done to achieve consensus on what constitutes an appropriate screen or assessment instrument for detecting elder abuse. The lack of research in the field of elder mistreatment has hindered the evolution and development of helpful instruments, as performance characteristics have not been validated across an array of clinical settings, populations, and healthcare providers.

Substantial evidence exists for the following risk factors of elder abuse:

Healthcare providers should keep these "red flags" in mind in all interactions with elder patients. They indicate that a more in-depth history should be taken. However, even without these indicators, maintaining a high index of suspicion is important.

Some general recommendations when evaluating a patient for possible elder abuse include keeping questions direct and simple and asking in a nonjudgmental or nonthreatening manner. It is also helpful to interview the patient and caregiver together and separately to detect disparities offering clues to the diagnosis of abuse.

Accurate and objective documentation of the interview is essential. Documentation of all findings may be entered as evidence in criminal trials or in guardianship hearings. Documentation must be complete, thorough, and legible. It is helpful to quote direct statements made by the patient.


In a systematic summary of the published work on forensic markers of elder abuse with respect to physical findings, there is a paucity of primary data. Most research on clinical findings purported to be common in elder abuse derives from anecdotes, case reports, or small case series. As a result, consider abuse in the differential diagnosis of every elderly person entering the ED.

Thoroughly disrobe the patient to evaluate for unexpected injuries. Roll the patient to evaluate for back injuries and/or decubitus ulcers.

Although not guided strongly by evidence, a number of clinical findings and observations make elder abuse a strong possibility, including the following:

During the physical examination, note the size, shape, and location of all injuries. Incorporate the use of body maps/charts in cases of extensive injuries. Photographing the injuries is helpful for forensic documentation.[11]


Many theories have been developed to explain abusive behavior toward elderly people. Clearly, no single answer exists to explain behavior in an abusive relationship. A number of psychosocial and cultural factors are involved.

Theories of the origin of mistreatment of elders have been divided into 4 major categories, as follows: physical and mental impairment of the patient, caregiver stress, transgenerational violence, and psychopathology in the abuser.

Physical and mental impairment of the patient

Recent studies have failed to show direct correlation between patient frailty and abuse, even though it had been assumed that frailty itself was a risk factor for abuse.

Physical and mental impairment nevertheless appear to play an indirect role in elder abuse, decreasing seniors' ability to defend themselves or to escape, thus increasing vulnerability.

Caregiver stress

This theory suggests that elder abuse is caused by the stress associated with caring for an elderly patient, compounded by stresses from the outside world.

The effect of stress factors (eg, alcohol or drug abuse, potential for injury from falls, incontinence, elderly persons' violent verbal behavior, employment problems, low income on the part of the abuser) may all culminate in caregivers' expressions of anger or antagonism toward the elderly person, resulting in violence.

This theory, however, does not explain how individuals in identically stressful situations manage without abusing seniors in their care. Stress should be seen more as a trigger for abuse than as a cause.

Transgenerational violence

This theory asserts that family violence is a learned behavior that is passed down from generation to generation. Thus, the child who was once abused by the parent continues the cycle of violence when both are older.

Psychopathology in the abuser

This theory focuses on a psychological deficiency in the development of the abuser. Drug and alcohol addiction, personality disorders, mental retardation, dementia, and other conditions can increase the likelihood of elder abuse. In fact, family members with such conditions are most likely to be primary caretakers for elderly relatives because they are the individuals typically at home due to lack of employment.

Other risk factors in abuse are (1) shared living arrangements between the elder person and the abuser, (2) dependence of the abuser on the victim, and (3) social isolation of the elder person.

Laboratory Studies

Evaluate for evidence of infection, dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, malnutrition, improper medication administration, and substance abuse in patients who have been abused.

Imaging Studies

X-rays of relevant body parts can be used to detect fractures (unusual or pathologic).

A dead CT scan can be used to detect intracranial bleeding as a result of abuse or to detect a possible explanation for injuries (hydrocephalus causing ataxia leading to falls) or altered mental status.[12]


Pelvic examination with forensic evidence collection in cases of sexual assault.

Emergency Department Care

Medical visits are often the only times victims leave their homes or are allowed out by the abuser. Because older adults do not usually self-report instances of elder abuse, the responsibility for identification, reporting, and intervention rests largely with healthcare professionals, social service agencies, and police departments.

Many factors are involved in the management of older persons who have been abused, including immediate care, long-term assessment and care, education, and prevention.

Elder abuse and neglect are not problems that can be assessed quickly. Intervention can be a lengthy process, especially in a busy ED. Due to the wide variations of types of abuse, interventions vary from simple social service referral to the extreme of removing the patient from the home. The clinician's highest priority in suspected abuse cases is in balancing the safety versus the autonomy of the patient. The ultimate goal is to provide the aging adult with a more fulfilling and enjoyable life.

Once it is suspected, elder mistreatment should be reported to adult protective services. However, most healthcare professionals feel unprepared to fulfill this role, lacking guidance on how to proceed. Most hospitals have no protocols for identifying or addressing elder abuse; therefore, even if the physician did recognize a case, he or she may not know the proper management involved. The NCEA web site is a valuable tool in identifying state-specific resources to assist in the reporting of elder abuse to the appropriate authorities.

More research on elder mistreatment is needed to inform practice. Despite the need for more data on interventions, a reasonable approach is a multidisciplinary one, specifically tailored to the situation, ideally involving multiple team members with varied expertise. The multidisciplinary team should include physicians, nurses, office-based social workers, community-based social workers, visiting nurses, and Adult Protective Services case workers.

Immediate care in the emergency department focuses on treating the physical manifestations of abuse and assuring the safety of the patient. This may include the following:

Referral to social services and Adult Protective Services are also vital to decrease morbidity and mortality and to further guide patient care after the ED encounter.

No federal statute is specifically dedicated to preventing the mistreatment of elderly persons similar to those targeted at child abuse and domestic violence. Currently, elder abuse is defined by state laws, but state definitions vary considerably from one jurisdiction to another. They contain multiple sections regarding who is protected, who must report, definitions of reportable behavior, requirements for investigation of reports, penalties, and guardianship.

Mandatory reporting laws for healthcare providers exist in all 50 states and the District of Columbia for confirmed cases of elder abuse and 43 states mandate reporting of suspected cases. Cases of suspected elder abuse should be reported to Adult Protective Services.

Thirty states have penalties for failing to report suspected elder abuse, and some states require that licensed professionals who have not fulfilled their obligations to report elder abuse can be reported to the appropriate licensing authority.

Every state has at least one statute providing immunity from civil or criminal liability to anyone who makes a report of abuse in good faith.

Physicians must educate themselves concerning the laws, legislation, and channels for reporting abuse in their province.

Mandatory reporting of elder abuse in competent patients is a controversial topic. Many feel that mandatory reporting of abuse of mentally competent victims of elder abuse disempowers the abused individual. The laws created for elder abuse were based upon child abuse laws; therefore, the inability of patients to make decisions in their own best interests was presumed. The laws are weak on matters such as financial abuse, since children generally have no money to exploit.

Nonetheless, while the state laws are not perfect, a diagnosis of elder abuse is reportable.

Barriers to recognizing and reporting elder abuse also must be addressed. The lack of uniform definitions has been a major obstacle. Conceptual problems in defining elder abuse have hampered clinical, educational, and research efforts.

Various factors serve as barriers to reporting elder abuse. These include lack of knowledge, denial, ageism, fear of making the situation worse, desire to maintain family relationships, fear of ending up in court, or lack of belief that the situation will improve. The key to eradicating these barriers is education that increases both public and professional awareness.

Increasing awareness is considered instrumental in the prevention of elder abuse. Services for seniors, such as meals on wheels, home health care, homemaker, and chore services, are thought to aid in abuse prevention, although preventing elder abuse needs further study.


See the list below:

Medication Summary

No specific medication is used to treat elder abuse. Avoid anxiolytics and hypnotics because they make patients less able to defend themselves against acts of abuse.

Further Outpatient Care

Long-term assessment and care vary with the needs of the patient. Assessment usually involves a visit to the home to evaluate the patient's functional status, living environment, and the condition of the caregiver. The services needed to optimize the care of the patient can be determined only after a home visit.

In a descriptive study of in-home geriatric assessment in two New Jersey counties, it was discovered that this assessment was able to contribute at least one relevant intervention for 81% of referred adult protective services (APS) clients to collaboratively help mitigate elder mistreatment circumstances.[13] This underscores the importance of referral to the appropriate services and agencies.

Stress to competent patients who refuse help that abuse rarely resolves—it usually escalates. Inform patients that a number of agencies can provide help; provide phone numbers and addresses of these agencies. Develop safety and follow-up plans before the patient leaves the ED.

Patient Education

National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse

National Adult Protective Services Association

The National Center for Victims of Crime

National Center on Elder Abuse

U.S. Administration on Aging - Eldercare Locator



Trevor John Mills, MD, MPH, Chief of Emergency Medicine, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System; Professor of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Robert Harwood, MD, MPH, FACEP, FAAEM, Senior Physcian, Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center; Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Barry E Brenner, MD, PhD, FACEP, Professor of Emergency Medicine, Professor of Internal Medicine, Program Director for Emergency Medicine, Sanz Laniado Medical Center, Netanya, Israel

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Steven A Conrad, MD, PhD, Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine; Chief, Multidisciplinary Critical Care Service, Professor, Department of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


Laurel H Krouse, MD Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Paoli Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Monique I Sellas, MD Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Clinical Instructor, Harvard Medical School

Monique I Sellas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Forensic Examiners, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.


  1. Werner, C. The Older Population: 2010. United States Census Bureau. Available at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdf. Accessed: February 25, 2015.
  2. U.S. Population Projections. U.S. Census Bureau: Population Division. August 2008. Available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/summarytables.html
  3. Sooryanarayana R, Choo WY, Hairi NN. A Review on the Prevalence and Measurement of Elder Abuse in the Community. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013 Jul 22. [View Abstract]
  4. National Center on Elder Abuse. Types of abuse. Updated September 28, 2007. Available at http://www.ncea.aoa.gov/NCEAroot/Main_Site/FAQ/Basics/Types_Of_Abuse.aspx. Accessed: April 20, 2009.
  5. Monfort JC, Villemur V, Lezy AM, Baron-Laforet S, Droes RM. From paedophilia to gerontophilia. Lancet. 2011 Jan 22. 377(9762):300. [View Abstract]
  6. Wagenaar DB, Rosenbaum R, Page C, Herman S. Primary care physicians and elder abuse: current attitudes and practices. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Dec. 110(12):703-11. [View Abstract]
  7. Yon Y, Mikton CR, Gassoumis ZD, Wilber KH. Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Feb. 5 (2):e147-e156. [View Abstract]
  8. Yon Y, Ramiro-Gonzalez M, Mikton CR, Huber M, Sethi D. The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1. 29 (1):58-67. [View Abstract]
  9. Alexandra Hernandez-Tejada M, Amstadter A, Muzzy W, Acierno R. The national elder mistreatment study: race and ethnicity findings. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2013. 25(4):281-93. [View Abstract]
  10. American Medical Association. Diagnostic treatment guidelines on elder abuse and neglect. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1992. 4-37.
  11. Gibbs LM. Understanding the medical markers of elder abuse and neglect: physical examination findings. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014 Nov. 30 (4):687-712. [View Abstract]
  12. Lee M, Rosen T, Murphy K, Sagar P. A Role for Imaging in the Detection of Physical Elder Abuse. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Nov. 15 (11):1648-1650. [View Abstract]
  13. Heath JM, Kobylarz FA, Brown M, Castano S. Interventions from home-based geriatric assessments of adult protective service clients suffering elder mistreatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep. 53(9):1538-42. [View Abstract]
  14. Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, Resnick HS, Steve K, Muzzy W, et al. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb. 100(2):292-7. [View Abstract]
  15. Allison EJ, Ellis PC, Wilson SE. Elder abuse and neglect: the emergency medicine perspective. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Sep. 5(3):355-63. [View Abstract]
  16. American College of Emergency Physicians. Management of elder abuse and neglect. Policy statement. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 1998. 31(1):149-150. [View Abstract]
  17. Birrer R, Singh U, Kumar DN. Disability and dementia in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999 May. 17(2):505-17, xiii. [View Abstract]
  18. Carney MT, Kahan FS, Paris BE BE. Elder abuse: is every bruise a sign of abuse?. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003 Mar. 70(2):69-74. [View Abstract]
  19. Ciccarello MJ. Recent legal trends affecting your older patients. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep. 50(3):790-9. [View Abstract]
  20. Clarke ME, Pierson W. Management of elder abuse in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999 Aug. 17(3):631-44, vi. [View Abstract]
  21. Dyer CB, Heisler CJ, Hill CA, Kim LC. Community approaches to elder abuse. Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 May. 21(2):429-47. [View Abstract]
  22. Fulmer T, Guadagno L, Bitondo Dyer C, Connolly MT. Progress in elder abuse screening and assessment instruments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Feb. 52(2):297-304. [View Abstract]
  23. Jogerst GJ, Daly JM, Brinig MF. Domestic elder abuse and the law. Am J Public Health. 2003 Dec. 93(12):2131-6. [View Abstract]
  24. Jones JS, Holstege C, Holstege H. Elder abuse and neglect: understanding the causes and potential risk factors. Am J Emerg Med. 1997. 15(6):579-583. [View Abstract]
  25. Jones JS, Veenstra TR, Seamon JP, Krohmer J. Elder mistreatment: national survey of emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 1997. 30(4):473-479. [View Abstract]
  26. Kahan FS, Paris BE BE. Why elder abuse continues to elude the health care system. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003 Jan. 70(1):62-8. [View Abstract]
  27. Kennedy RD. Elder abuse and neglect: the experience, knowledge, and attitudes of primary care physicians. Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug. 37(7):481-5. [View Abstract]
  28. Kleinschmidt KC. Elder abuse: a review. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Oct. 30(4):463-72. [View Abstract]
  29. Koenig RJ, DeGuerre CR. The legal and governmental response to domestic elder abuse. Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 May. 21(2):383-98. [View Abstract]
  30. Kruger RM, Moon CH. Can you spot the signs of elder mistreatment?. Postgrad Med. 1999 Aug. 106(2):169-73, 177-8, 183. [View Abstract]
  31. Lachs MS, Pillemer K. Abuse and neglect of elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 16. 332(7):437-43. [View Abstract]
  32. Lachs MS, Pillemer K. Elder abuse. Lancet. 2004 Oct 2-8. 364(9441):1263-72. [View Abstract]
  33. Lachs MS, Williams CS, O'Brien S, et al. ED use by older victims of family violence. Ann Emerg Med. 1997. 30(4):448-454. [View Abstract]
  34. McDonald AJ, Abrahams ST. Social emergencies in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1990 May. 8(2):443-59. [View Abstract]
  35. Nelson HD, Nygren P, McInerney Y, Klein J. Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: a review of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 2. 140(5):387-96. [View Abstract]
  36. Paris BE, Meier DE, Goldstein T, et al. Elder abuse and neglect: how to recognize warning signs and intervene. Geriatrics. 1995 Apr. 50(4):47-51. [View Abstract]
  37. Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics. 2000 Census of Population and Housing: United States. U.S. Census Bureau: Population Division. May 2001. Available at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/dp1/2kh00.pdf
  38. Quinn K, Zielke H. Elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation: policy issues. Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 May. 21(2):449-57. [View Abstract]
  39. Rosenblatt DE, Cho K, Durance PW. Reporting mistreatment of older adults: the role of physicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996. 44:65-70. [View Abstract]
  40. Swagerty DL, Takayashi PY. Elder mistreatment. American Family Physician. 1999. 59(10):
  41. Tintinalli JE, Ruiz E, Krome RL. Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. McGraw Hill Text; 1996. 1377-78.